Compare amd processor: Intel Core i5-12400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: Value CPU Showdown

What are the key differences and which one’s better?

Quick Links

• What are Intel vPro and AMD Ryzen PRO?

• Intel vPro and AMD Ryzen PRO lineups

• Which one should you buy?

• Intel vPro and AMD Ryzen PRO laptop availability

Picking the right laptop or desktop PC that can handle your day-to-day workloads isn’t exactly an easy process. From choosing the right processor and display to figuring out the amount of RAM and storage you need, there are plenty of things to mull over. And in addition to these basic components, you’ll often come across the term ‘Intel vPro’ or ‘Ryzen PRO’. If you are wondering what they are and want to know if you really need them, you’ve come to the right place. In this article, we’re going to take a look at the Intel vPro vs AMD Ryzen PRO comparison to tell you all about these technologies.

What are Intel vPro and AMD Ryzen PRO?

At their core, both Intel vPro and AMD Ryzen PRO technologies are made for enterprise/business use. As a part of Intel’s vPro or AMD Ryzen PRO platform, you get some additional features with which you can expect things like improved security, stability, easy management features, top-notch performance, and more. So while the processors themselves are doing all the heavy lifting, it’s these extra features that make these platforms more enticing as enterprise solutions.

Intel made a notable upgrade to its vPro technology last year with the launch of its 12th Gen Alder Lake mobile CPUs. With a newfound focus on remote work emerging in the last few years, Intel expanded the vPro platform into new areas to coincide with its 12th Gen chips. There are now four different categories of vPro processors that have carried forward with the unveiling of Intel’s 13th Gen Raptop Lake mobile processors.

• Intel vPro Enterprise: Built for large-scale businesses and companies with a global workforce.
• Intel vPro Essentials: Tailored for small businesses that may not necessarily need the advanced scalability that comes with vPro Enterprise.
• Intel vPro Enterprise for Chrome: Built for Chromebooks that need extra security and performance for business work.
• Intel vPro, An Evo Design: A combination of nimble and powerful Evo-certified laptops with extra security and management features.

Intel vPro now goes beyond just the basic standards of a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) or network format support. You now get a set of management tools that cater to a specific set of users. For instance, an enterprise IT department can access a remote machine via vPro’s remote management tools whenever there’s a need. The remote assistance feature can also be used to diagnose problems, deploy software updates, and more.

AMD’s Ryzen PRO technology offers a similar set of features focused on business and enterprise use. AMD separates their PRO SKUs in a more distinct way, as you’ll see in the list of compatible processors below. But if you’re buying a laptop with the Ryzen PRO badge, it means you’re getting a laptop that focuses not only on security and management, but also strong performance.

Security is a big factor to consider when it comes to enterprise machines, and we think both Intel and AMD handle it very well with their own platforms. Both vPro and Ryzen PRO chips offer great security features that go beyond what the operating system and hardware offer to protect your sensitive data.

For starters, both Intel and AMD have worked with Microsoft to offer Secured-Core PCs that keep you safe at all times from firmware and OS vulnerabilities. This is crucial, especially when a new version of the software is released. Notably, AMD has a three-layer security system that works in tandem with the OS and hardware to protect your data. AMD’s Ryzen 5000- and 6000-series chips add a Shadow Stack to the chip’s architecture to help prevent software attacks. These chips also have a memory guard to protect your PC’s memory.

Intel vPro chips also offer a good set of security features for their enterprise customers. There’s a Hardware Shield that’s exclusive to the Intel vPro platform. And just like in the AMD system, this feature operates below the OS level to enhance the overall security of your PC. Intel vPro chips also get a secure boot sequence thanks to virtualization-based security (VBS) reinforcement. Notably, we’re looking at a bunch of security features with the Hardware Shield including Intel Threat Detection Technology, Intel Total Memory Encryption, Intel Trusted Execution Technology, and more.

These features can be a little overwhelming for average PC users, but it becomes an easy pill to swallow since they’re deployed and managed by IT departments within an organization. As an end-user, all you need to know is that both AMD and Intel enterprise platforms have ample security features baked into them. It’s just a matter of picking the right SKU based on your use case.

Intel vPro and AMD Ryzen PRO lineups

Intel’s latest 13th Gen processor lineup (as well as older generations not listed here) has a wide variety of vPro SKUs to choose from. That’s great because you’re bound to find a vPro processor in each category, be it the high-end HX- and H-series chips for workstations, P-series chips for thin and light office notebooks, or entry-level machines powered by the U series. This will allow you to find a vPro-based Intel machine across different price points too. Here’s a quick look at all the vPro-compatible processors in the new Raptor Lake mobile chip series.

Intel 13th Gen Raptor Lake HX-series vPro processors

Specification	Intel Core i9-13950HX	Intel Core i7-13850HX	Intel Core i5-13600HX
Cores	24 (8P + 16E)	20 (8P + 12E)	14 (6P + 8E)
Threads	32	28	20
Base frequency	2. 2GHz (P), 1.6GHz (E)	2.1GHz (P), 1.5GHz (E)	2.6GHz (P), 1.9GHz (E)
Max Turbo frequency	5.5GHz (P), 4.0GHz (E)	5.3GHz (P), 3.8GHz (E)	4.8GHz (P), 3.6GHz (E)
L3 Cache	36MB	30MB	24MB
Base TDP	55W	55W	55W
Max Turbo TDP	157W	157W	157W
Graphics	32 EU	32 EU	32 EU
Intel vPro	Enterprise	Enterprise	Enterprise

Intel 13th Gen Raptor Lake H-series vPro processors

Specification	Core i9-13900HK	Core i9-13900H	Core i7-13800H	Core i7-13700H	Core i5-13600H	Core i5-13420H
Cores	14 (6P + 8E)	14 (6P + 8E)	14 (6P + 8E)	14 (6P + 8E)	12 (4P + 8E)	12 (4P + 8E)
Threads	20	20	20	20	16	12
Base frequency	2. 6GHz (P), 1.9GHz (E)	2.6GHz (P), 1.9GHz (E)	2.5GHz (P), 1.8GHz (E)	2.4GHz (P), 1.8GHz (E)	2.8GHz (P), 2.1GHz (E)	2.6GHz (P), 1.9GHz (E)
Max Turbo frequency	5.4GHz (P), 4.1GHz (E)	5.4GHz (P), 4.1GHz (E)	5.2GHz (P) 4.0GHz (E)	5.0GHz (P), 3.7GHz (E)	4.8GHz (P), 3.6GHz (E)	4.7GHz (P), 3.5GHz (E)
L3 Cache	24MB	24MB	24MB	24MB	18MB	18MB
Base TDP	45W	45W	45W	45W	45W	45W
Max Turbo TDP	115W	115W	115W	115W	95W	95W
Graphics	96 EU	96 EU	96 EU	96 EU	80 EU	80 EU
Intel vPro	Essentials	Enterprise	Enterprise	Essentials	Enterprise	Essentials

Intel 13th Gen Alder Lake P-series vPro processors

Specification	Core i7-1370P	Core i7-1360P	Core i5-1350P	Core i5-1340P
Cores	14 (6P + 8E)	12 (4P + 8E)	12 (4P + 8E)	12 (4P + 8E)
Threads	20	16	16	16
Base frequency	1. 9GHz (P), 1.4GHz (E)	2.2GHz (P), 1.6GHz (E)	1.9GHz (P), 1.4GHz (E)	1.9GHz (P), 1.4GHz (E)
Max Turbo frequency	5.2GHz (P), 3.9GHz (E)	5.0GHz (P) 3.7GHz (E)	4.7GHz (P), 3.5GHz (E)	4.6GHz (P), 3.4GHz (E)
L3 Cache	24MB	18MB	12MB	12MB
Base TDP	28W	28W	28W	28W
Max Turbo TDP	64W	64W	64W	64W
Graphics	96 EU	96 EU	80 EU	80 EU
Intel vPro	Enterprise	Essentials	Enterprise	Essentials

Intel 13th Gen Raptor Lake U-series vPro processors

Specification	Core i7-1365U	Core i7-1355U	Core i5-1345U	Core i5-1335U	Core i5-1334U
Cores	10 (2P + 8E)	10 (2P + 8E)	10 (2P + 8E)	10 (2P + 8E)	10 (2P + 8E)
Threads	12	12	12	12	12
Base frequency	1. 8GHz (P), 1.3GHz (E)	1.7GHz (P), 1.2GHz (E)	1.6GHz (P), 1.2GHz (E)	1.3GHz (P), 0.9GHz (E)	1.3GHz (P), 0.9GHz (E)
Max Turbo frequency	5.2Ghz (P), 3.9GHz (E)	5.0GHz (P), 3.7GHz (E)	4.7GHz (P), 3.5GHz (E)	4.6GHz (P), 3.4GHz (E)	4.6GHz (P), 3.4GHz (E)
L3 Cache	12MB	12MB	12MB	12MB	12MB
Base TDP	15W	15W	15W	15W	15W
Max Turbo TDP	55W	55W	55W	55W	55W
Graphics	96 EU	96 EU	80 EU	80 EU	80 EU
Intel vPro	Enterprise	Essentials	Enterprise	Essentials	Essentials

Intel’s 12th Gen vPro chips are still a popular choice, and you can check out the full details in our guide to Intel 12th Gen Alder Lake processors.

On AMD’s side, you’ll find these Ryzen PRO processors in both the newer Ryzen 6000 and the older Ryzen 5000 mobile processors. These CPUs range from 15W to 45W, which means you’ll find both entry-level and more power-efficient chips to high-performance chips for high-end workstations. Here’s a quick look at all the available AMD Ryzen PRO SKUs across the two generations. Note that AMD has also unveiled some of its Ryzen 7000 mobile processors, though the full lineup including PRO variants still needs some time before going public.

AMD Ryzen PRO 6000 Series Mobile Processors

Specification	AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H	AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS	AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H	AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS	AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
Cores	8	8	8	8	8	6	6	6
Threads	16	16	16	16	16	12	12	12
Base Frequency	3. 3GHz	3.3GHz	3.2GHz	3.2GHz	2.7GHz	3.3GHz	3.3GHz	2.9GHz
Max Boost Frequency	4.9GHz	4.9GHz	4.7GHz	4.7GHz	4.7GHz	4.5GHz	4.5GHz	4.5GHz
Default TDP	45W	35W	45W	35W	15-28W	45W	35W	15-28W
Graphics Model	AMD Radeon 680M	AMD Radeon 680M	AMD Radeon 680M	AMD Radeon 680M	AMD Radeon 680M	AMD Radeon 660M	AMD Radeon 660M	AMD Radeon 660M
GPU Compute Units	12	12	12	12	12	6	6	6
Node	6nm	6nm	6nm	6nm	6nm	6nm	6nm	6nm

AMD Ryzen PRO 5000 Series Mobile Processors

Specification	AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U	AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U	AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U	AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U
Cores	8	8	6	6	4	4
Threads	16	16	12	12	8	8
Base Frequency	2. 0GHz	1.9GHz	2.3GHz	2.3GHz	2.7GHz	2.6GHz
Max Boost Frequency	4.5GHz	4.4GHz	4.3GHz	4.2GHz	4.1GHz	4.0GHz
Default TDP	15W	15W	15W	15W	15	15W
Graphics Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	AMD Radeon Graphics	AMD Radeon Graphics	AMD Radeon Graphics	AMD Radeon Graphics	AMD Radeon Graphics
GPU Compute Units	8	8	7	7	6	6
Node	7nm	7nm	7nm	7nm	7nm	7nm

Which one should you buy?

If you are a casual user who is shopping for a personal computer to handle your basic day-to-day workloads, then you don’t need to worry about either. We say that because both Intel vPro and AMD Ryzen Pro branded PCs aren’t intended for the average user. These computing platforms are best suited for business purposes. And in most cases, the laptops based on these platforms will be deployed to you through a business or an enterprise. This means that there’s a very good chance that you may not even get an option to choose between the two. But in case you do get to pick between an Intel vPro or an AMD Ryzen PRO-based machine, then we’d say the decision should come down to the processor you want to use. It’s the overall performance of the processor that matters the most at the end of the day.

Intel has the new 13th Gen Raptor Lake vPro processors for business whereas AMD has its new Ryzen 6000 processors with PRO technologies for businesses. While Intel’s 12th Gen processors have shown a significant performance improvement that’s continued with 13th Gen chips, AMD’s 6000 series hardware (as well as the Ryzen 7000 PRO chips we’re expecting to see this year) are also very promising.

It’s safe to say that both platforms have some capable machines that can handle even the most demanding workloads with great power efficiency. If you are hung up on which platform to pick, then we suggest you check out the extra features included with the machine. Modern Intel vPro laptops, for instance, have support for Thunderbolt 4 while most AMD laptops do not use Thunderbolt.

Intel vPro and AMD Ryzen PRO laptop availability

ThinkPad X1 Carbon (Gen 10)

Some of the best laptops available today can come equipped with either an Intel vPro or AMD Ryzen PRO processor. The generation of processor might change depending on how much you want to pay or what your employer is looking to supply, but you’re still going to get the same core security and management features that make them perfect for business work. Laptop OEMs might also be a bit behind in getting the latest processors into their machines, as 13th Gen Intel and AMD Ryzen 7000 mobile CPUs were only recently introduced.

In any case, you can distinguish between an Intel vPro/AMD Ryzen PRO laptop and a regular one by looking for a branding that’s physically displayed (with the CPU sticker). Alternatively, you can also look at the specs to find out more.

If you’re looking to buy a new laptop with one of these technologies, be sure to have a look at our best business laptop collection. Our favorite is currently the ThinkPad X1 Carbon (Gen 10) with 12th Gen Intel Core vPro CPUs, and we know that the X1 Carbon Gen 11 model is on the way with newer 13th Gen Raptor Lake Intel chips. You can check out our ThinkPad X1 Carbon (Gen 10) review for more information about what Editor-in-Chief Rich Woods calls «the pinnacle of business productivity.»

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 9

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 10

Lenovo’s ThinkPad X1 Carbon (Gen 10) comes equipped with Intel’s 12th Gen Alder Lake vPro processors for strong performance and security. The laptop itself is stunning and has many high-end features geared toward a life of business.

See at Lenovo See at Amazon

On AMD’s side, Lenovo has another hit with its first-gen ThinkPad Z16. It’s available with AMD Ryzen 6000 PRO processors and supporting hardware for relatively intensive tasks. In our Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 review, Editor-in-Chief noted its impressive battery life, strong performance, sleek design, and gorgeous display.

Lenovo ThinkPad Z16

The Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 was one of the first notebooks to be available with AMD’s new Ryzen 6000 PRO series processors, and it remains a powerful, high-end option for those who don’t want to stray away from Team Red.

See at Lenovo

Which Takes The Performance Crown?

Today Intel is lifting the performance embargo of its new 13th Gen Raptor Lake processors and here well be taking a look at the Core i9-13900K — it’s new flagship, in a review of the most powerful, highest core count desktop processor the company has produced. It currently retails for $659, compared to $699 for AMD’s Ryzen 9 7950X.

Intel’s Core i9-13900K

Antony Leather

It has a total of 24 cores, made of of 16 ‘Performance cores’ and eight ‘Efficient cores’, while its predecessor — the Core i9-12900K had just 16 cores, with the new flagship gaining an extra eight Efficient cores. This will likely help it in multi-threaded workloads — a boost it needs if it’s to counter the massive multi-threaded performance of the new AMD Ryzen 9 7950X.

Also helping to boost its performance is huge increase in frequencies. It’s peak boost frequency sits at 5.8GHz, with an expected Core i9-13900KS likely to hit 6GHz out of the box. 5.8GHz was observed during testing too and so was an all-core boost frequency in multi-threaded workloads on its Performance cores of 5.5GHz — both massive increases over the Core i9-12900K — the peak being a huge 600MHz faster.

Intel’s new 13th Gen Raptor Lake CPUs

Intel

MORE FROMFORBES ADVISOR

It sees increases to its cache amounts too — more than double the L2 cache from 14MB to 32MB and 6MB added to the original 30MB L3 cache too. AMD has also increased cache amounts and like Intel, has tweaked its architecture from the previous generation, but it hasn’t increased core counts, instead relying on higher frequencies and its Zen 4 architecture alone.

Test system and benchmarks

The Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero for Intel’s 13th Gen Raptor Lake CPUs

Antony Leather

The test system uses the latest drivers and Windows 11 updates that were up to date as of October 15th 2022 and I’ve re-tested every CPU in the graphs too — I’d check every review out there to make sure they state the same as these things do make a big difference to the results. Default BIOS settings were used, but the correct memory settings applied using XMP or AMD EXPO profiles.

The hardware includes an Nvidia RTX 3070, custom water-cooling system featuring Corsair Hydro X components and a Barrow Ropilema test bench. I’ve also used G.Skill Trident Z Neo EXPO 6000MHz DDR5 memory for the AMD Ryzen 7000 system, Corsair 3466MHz Vengeance Pro RGB memory for the socket AM4 system and Kingston 6,000MHz Fury DDR5 memory for the Intel LGA1700 system along with a Corsair RM850x power supply. I used an Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero motherboard to test the 12th Gen Intel CPUs, and a Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master motherboard to test the AMD Ryzen 5000 CPUs and ASRock X670E Taichi to test the new Ryzen 7000 CPUs.

Benchmarks

Below we can see Procyon’s combined Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom script benchmark and here AMD’s new Ryzen 7000 CPUs had a consistent lead with even the Ryzen 5 7600X beating the Core i9-13900K, albeit not by much. Adobe actually released updates for all its software just as I finished testing, so it’s possible these could see improvements that would swing things in Intel’s favor. Sadly that wasn’t something I had time to test.

In Adobe Premiere Pro, the Core i9-12900K remained the fastest overall, which is a slightly strange result and again could be down to software, but it’s win for the Core i9-13900K against the Ryzen 9 7950X and by a noticeable margin.

Below the single-thread test in Cinebench sees the Core i9-13900K sit at the top of the graph and soundly beat the Ryzen 9 7950X partly thanks to its 5. 8GHz peak boost frequency that also gave it a sizeable edge over the Core i5-13600K and Core i9-12900K.

This is a pretty big scalp for Intel — beating the Ryzen 9 7950X in Cinebench’s multi-threaded test. What’s also impressive is the massive increase over the Core i9-12900K — from 27,579 to 40,444 points in single generation is a massive leap forward.

below is HandBrake and here it was a very close call between the Ryzen 9 7950X and Core i9-13900K, with the latter gaining huge ground over the Core i9-12900K and ultimately just pipping AMD to the post.

Games are also very important as the Core i9-13900K is also touted as the fastest gaming CPU. That certainly seemed to be the case in Forza Horizon 5, gaining a few frames over the Ryzen 9 7950X and also being a lot faster than the Core i9-12900K

Watch Dogs: Legion saw very slim margins between the CPUs at the top and it’s practically within the margin of error between the top eight CPUs in the graph despite decent scaling from the lowest point in the graph to the highest. Still, the Core i9-13900K just edged out the Ryzen 9 7950X, but didn’t offer anything more than the Core i9-12900K.

Far Cry 6 was another win for Intel, with a noticeable lead over the Ryzen 9 7950X, but only marginally quicker than the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, which is of course a lot cheaper and on a cheaper platform too.

The fairly significant fly in the ointment — power consumption. This is something Intel really needs to address, although it has to be said temperatures never topped 90°C. Still, a stock power draw of 546W for the system as a whole compared to 376W for the Ryzen 9 7950X is a huge gap and while not many tasks will force this kind of workload, AMD is clearly far more efficient and will be adding significantly less to your electricity bill.

Overclocking and tempratures

I had limited time to overclock the Core i9-13900K, but did manage an all-core overclock of 5.7GHz using a vcore of 1.4V. This may well be improved and with a lower voltage, but that seemed to be the limit of my CPU with a simple manual overclock, while the Core i5-13600K fared much better here. The overclock saw the Cinebench score rise from 40,444 to 41,015 but didn’t impact gaming especially. However, it did lower the peak power draw by 20W and temperatures fell from close to 90°C to around 85°C.

Conclusions

It’s not a clean sweep for Intel, with AMD’s Ryzen 7950X getting the better of it in a couple of tests an also offering far superior power efficiency. However, there’s no denying the Core i9-13900K just about takes the performance crown. It’s faster in Premiere Pro, Cinebench in both single and multi-thread as well as all three game tests. That’s quite conclusive.

The question on whether you should buy the Core i9-13900K isn’t that simple, though, as there are other factors at play. It’s slightly cheaper than AMD’s CPU, has the benefit of supporting cheaper DDR4 memory with a compatible motherboard, whereas you’re forced to invest in DDR5 memory with new AMD systems now. Those Intel motherboards can also be found for lower prices.

AMD’s advantage also comes from better longevity — Intel’s current CPU socket isn’t meant to have any more CPU upgrades while AMD’s Socket AM5 is to be supported for the next few years and at least another CPU generation. However, if you buy the Core i9-13900K, it’s doubtful you’d need another upgrade for a few years anyway.

Review and test AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D. Core i9-12900K vs Ryzen 7 5800X vs Ryzen 9 5900X — i2HARD

The moment we’ve all been waiting for has arrived — the Ryzen 7 5800X3D V-Cache has arrived!

Does it deserve to be called the best gaming processor or is it just a common hype? It’s time to find out. Let’s compare it with the no less top-end Ryzen 9 5900X and i9-12900K, and also see how far it has gone from the Ryzen 7 5800X.

Contents:

• About AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Test bench
• Stock tests
• Synthetic tests
• Temperatures and consumption
• Tests in games
• Overclocking system and components
• Synthetic tests
• Temperatures and consumption
• Tests in games
• Conclusion

About AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

“What’s so special about the 5800X3D? “What is the prefix “3D”?” some of you may ask. It’s very simple: in fact, this is a 5800X, which added 64 MB of L3 cache to the existing 32 MB. It was simple in words, but in reality it was not an easy engineering decision They added a layer of this cache to the existing CCD and an additional layer of silicon for protection.0005

Due to the danger of working with high voltages, the processor was limited by reducing the maximum boost frequency compared to the regular 5800X, and also blocked the possibility of overclocking. At the same time, the 5900X has an intermediate L3 cache value, but it is divided into different CCDs, which cannot be equated to a solid 64 MB cache.

Why is the L3 cache so important? Let’s try to explain. Here it should be noted that this is our personal representation, and the story will be in a very simplified form. You don’t have to look far for an example. Most of you know what the lack of RAM is fraught with. When it gets full, you have to wait for data from a much slower drive — SSD, or even HDD. If 16 GB is enough for some task, then choosing 32 GB will be a waste of money, and vice versa. If 8 GB is terribly lacking, and with 16 everything is fine, then this is a great buy. That is, we have an idea of ​​the required volume and at the moment the reference value is 16 GB. This is enough in the vast majority of games, but may not be enough for any software. nine0005

Also with the cache. Let’s just shift the hierarchy by 1 level and get everything the same. In some tasks, 32 MB will be enough, in some even 320 MB would not be enough, and when the processor makes a mistake, without predicting and loading the necessary data into its cache, instead of processing the data, it has to wait for them to arrive from RAM, the speed of which an order of magnitude lower. Therefore, performance in this case will be worse. This is commonly referred to as a cache miss.

Three possible situations can be extracted from this: after increasing the cache, it was either not enough or not enough, but there were fewer misses. It was not enough, but it became enough — in this case, we will get the maximum increase. And the third option, when we have it in abundance. In this case, the increase will again not be so large. nine0005

Based on these options, you can already understand that the performance difference between the regular 5800X and the 3D version will vary greatly. However, let’s look at a few examples.

Test stand

We’ve already identified the rivals: 5800X, 5900X, and 12900K with both types of memory. Two single-rank DDR5 modules are built on Hynix chips with XMP 6200 MHz CL38 and a total capacity of 32 GB. DDR4 dual-rank, on Samsung B-Die chips with the same volume. But instead of native XMP, we will simulate a more expensive kit at 3600 MHz with 16 timings. Cooling system — Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer II-360, a list of motherboards and other components is in front of you. The operating system is Windows 11. Well, if you want a test in the laboratory with maximum capabilities, then be sure to let us know — the chiller is ready. nine0005

• Video Card: Palit GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GameRock OC
• Processor #1: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
• Processor #2: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Processor #3: Intel Ryzen 9 5900X Processor #3: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X i9-12900K
• Motherboard #1: ASRock B550 Taichi Razer Edition
• Motherboard #2: ASUS TUF Gaming Z690-plus WIFI D4
• Motherboard #3: ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 HERO
• DDR4 RAM: G. SKILL Trident Z F4-3200C14D-32GTZ 2×16 GB 900K has impressive performance with DDR5, but comparing them between different platforms in Aida is better not worth it.

  In CPU-Z, the arrangement between ryzens fully corresponds to their frequency and number of cores. L3 cache had no effect.

  Same for Cinebench R23. The 12900K is second to none in terms of core count and performance.

  In Geekbench 5 L3, the cache made itself felt, allowing the 3D-shke to bypass the regular 5800X, though only by 3%, and then only in multithreading. DDR5 in this benchmark gives a noticeable increase in i9-mu.

  In Premiere Pro, it is no less important. Rendering by the processor on i9 with DDR5 is noticeably faster than on any of the ryzens. Surprisingly, the 12-core 5900X is not far from the 8-core ones. It appears to be heavily limited by the memory subsystem and the infiniti fabric.

  Temperatures and consumption

  The temperature of the novelty is also an acute issue. The additional layer of cache and silicon could not but have an effect, and the 5800X3D at a much lower voltage has not much less power consumption, and the temperatures are higher. Here, of course, the silicone lottery strongly influences, because even at equal voltages, processors can consume a different number of watts, and the quality of the lid and the internal thermal interface also vary. However, even in people with custom FSS, temperatures are not small. nine0005

  At the same time, 12900K is not cold either. It consumes 2 times more than 5800x3D, and it gets hotter.

  However, to be positive, since the 3D cabinet will be hot under any cooling system, does it mean that it will not be much worse under a conventional cooler? In theory, it is. Even with a tick on the FPU, the processor knocks its frequency and voltage under 90 degrees. That is, the cooler removes only 10 W less heat from the novelty. In this case, only 120 MHz of the core frequency is lost. nine0005

  In Cinebench, the difference is even smaller — 45 MHz, respectively, the result hardly differs.

  But this is pure processor load. If you add a video card to the equation, the situation becomes different. Even at our open stand, some of the hot air is sucked in by the cooler blades, unlike the LSS, which, on the contrary, warms up the video card a little. In such a situation, the processor becomes 10 degrees hotter. And although 85 degrees is the operating temperature, the realization of this, and the 100% thrashing cooler, is not something pleasant. A hot processor — this cannot be taken away from him. Perhaps its fate can be compared with video cards that, after a year of mining, already adhere to lower frequencies than before, but only time will tell whether this will be the case with him. nine0005

  Tests in games

  Well, let’s move on to games, it’s time to compare FPS.

  Cyberpunk graphics preset: ultra ray tracing, RT reflections off, DLSS — ultra performance, high crowd density. We also connected a third-party patch that allows you to use SMT ryzens. This is especially true for eight cores. Thanks for the tip to the user with the nickname Mirage. A lot of cores — little sense. This can be said about the 5900X. The 4 extra cores did nothing for it in this game, but the extra 3D cache provided a nice boost, thanks to which the 5800X3D outperformed 12900K with DDR4.

  Far Cry 6, ultra preset, DXR shadows and reflections on, HD textures off, FSR performance. This game parallels not only bad, but also strange. If on i9, in which hyperthreading is ignored, it looks even more or less, then in ryzen’ov it does not lend itself to any logic. Eight-core processors use CMT, but at the same time half of the cores are ignored, in the 5900X the second CCD seems to be invisible to Far Cry. However, in terms of average FPS, the 5800X3D is on par with the i9and even surpasses it in the statistics of rare and very rare events.

  Shadow of Lara. Highest preset, resolution modifier 20%, 600p. Here the 3D-scale wiped everyone’s nose. I even had to reduce the resolution as much as possible to show this, not limited by the performance of the 3080 Ti. A threefold increase in the cache gave an almost one and a half times increase in average FPS. The 5900X finally outperformed the 5800X, albeit by 9%. I wonder if this is due to 4 cores, more cache, or both? And it is the coldest processor in this comparison. The temperature of rivals 5800X3D is between 60 and 70 degrees, while the new product has warmed up to 80 degrees! nine0005

  StarCraft II, all settings maxed out. Here, unfortunately, windows 11 failed. If for i9 it is a boon in this strategy, then it is bad for ryzens. With so many unused cores, SMT is used for some reason. Their FPS on Windows 10 would be 10% higher. Nevertheless, L3 cache again showed a significant increase. By as much as 30%, the 3D-shka surpasses its namesake without this prefix, and even taking into account the negative impact of the 11th version of windows, it butts on a par with the i9th.

  Total War Saga: Troy, ultra preset, crowd density and grass detail — extreme, resolution scaling and anti-aliasing — minimum. Here it is already difficult to oppose the cache to the number of cores. Troy drives and forces to process much more data than other games in comparison. Therefore, a threefold increase in the cache does not really help, 4 cores 5900X gave it 17% additional frames, and DDR5 for i9 turned out to be a second wind, speeding it up by a third!

  CS:GO, minimum settings, maximum textures and anti-aliasing. We have already assumed more than once that 32 MB of L3 cache is ideal for the counter, since overclocking the memory did nothing for 5000th ryzens. 5800X3D only confirmed our guesses. Its FPS is lower than its counterparts due to its lower frame rate. At the same time, the 30 MB L3 cache of the i9 ended up right up against it, because after a few runs it gets clogged and its FPS drops sharply. Again, these are our assumptions. However, so far everything looks logical. nine0005

  Hunt Showdown, minimum graphics preset, high quality of objects and textures, FoV — 110. At the end of this test, a lot of mobs will spawn, because of which the FPS drops to an online level where it is impossible to make an objective comparison. The game is built on an already stale version of the CryEngine engine. The parallelism is mediocre, the 5900X is barely faster than the 5800X, but the L3 cache was thrashing again. It increased the average FPS of the 5800X3D by exactly 50%, allowing it to overtake the i9 with DDR5 by 27%.

  On average, over seven games, the 5800X3D turned out to be a quarter more productive than its brother with a smaller cache. And this is despite the lower core frequency. As we said at the beginning, and as you can see, this increase varies greatly from game to game. If we scored more games like Hunt Showdown and Lara, then we could shout that i9defeated, if such as CS: GO or Troy, then vice versa.

  Given that the processor consumes up to 120 watts due to its temperature limitations, the choice of motherboards for it is huge. The cost of the processor itself is not so happy. At the moment, it is not for sale, but when it was, it cost decently. Its recommended price is equal to that of the 5800X and noticeably lower than that of the R9 and i9. But in reality, everything is quite different. The 5800- and 5900X dropped a lot with the release of the new line of the competitor, but the 5800X3D sells for more than the recommended price. nine0005

  However, if you’re looking for top gaming performance, the 5800X3D delivers it for much less than the 12900KF and is a great upgrade option for Ryzen processor owners. Whether it’s worth the additional payment compared to the 5800X, given that everything depends on the performance of the current generation of video cards — of course, you decide. For most games, top processors are an empty overpayment and always have been. Only in some projects, or years later, in more demanding ones and with a more productive video card, they will show themselves. Well, should we talk about it? nine0005

  System and component overclocking

  Well, that was stock. Let’s now take a look at what will change after overclocking.

  We originally wanted to use ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Extreme for it. Unlike ASRock, the BIOS of which was very empty after installing 3D, there is literally nothing in it, even ReBar cannot be turned on, in extreme sports you can overclock the bus, change the voltage and LLC. But we did not do this. There are several reasons for this.

  The first and main one: bus overclocking, unlike intel, works differently on ryzens. The separation of the reference frequencies of the interfaces is implemented mediocrely. In simple words, SATA drives fall off. Are you ready to completely switch to NVME for a 3% increase in frequency, especially if you have a large hard drive in the system? nine0005

  The second reason is the failure of the undervolt on ryzens. In the cooling test for the 5800X, we said that you can fix the frequency and voltage, thereby dropping tens of degrees. You can’t fix the frequency on 5800X3D, Curve Optimizer hasn’t been implemented yet, and lowering the voltage by offset doesn’t give any significant results. Even a 50 mV reduction in voltage results in a slight reduction in performance with little improvement in temperature performance, and a larger reduction results in a huge loss in performance. At the same time, on Taichi, the processor boosts a little better without any settings. nine0005

  The third reason not to use Extreme was the possibility of estimating the gain purely from memory overclocking. We will touch on this at the end.

  As for the memory, the timings setting is the same for all ryzens. 3800 MHz with the first timing of 14 on 5800X and 5900X, and on 3D only 3733 MHz maximum with the same timings. The 5800X and 5900X cores were tuned with Curve Optimizer.

  12900K mastered 5 GHz for large cores and 4 GHz for small ones. DDR4 took a maximum of 3900 MHz with the first timing of 15. Here, how lucky. There are samples. which can go 300 MHz higher, but this also applies to ryzens. nine0005

  DDR5 overclocking is still not fully mastered. With new BIOS versions there is a run up to 6800 MHz, but the maximum stable frequency is still 6200 MHz. I mean, I just had to tighten the timings.

  Synthetic tests

  The same setting gave the same gains. The 5900X still leads the ryzen in terms of throughput, and sits between 3D and the regular 5800X in terms of latency.

  In CPU-Z and Cinebench 5800X3D sank relative to its brothers, since its cores could not be overclocked, 12900K improved the result in multi-thread and worsened in single-thread, as the turbo boost per core reached 5200 MHz. We also added the 5900X result with SMT disabled. We will need this in games, but in synthetics you can see how important this technology is. In CPU-Z, it gave 31%, and in cinebench 32% extra points in the multi-threaded test.

  In Geekbench, the regular 5800X returned the synthetic superiority over the cache-inflated version, this time SMT gave the 12-core 2 times less — only 15%, and i9with DDR5, it already dominates DDR4 to a lesser extent.

  In Premiere Pro, the 3D scale once again fell short of the regular 5800X. In fact, it’s even hard to explain. Either the cache gives a good boost, or memory overclocking. But 5800X3D slightly accelerated both from one and from the other.

  Temperatures and consumption

  Ironically, overclocking of processors has become an undervolt for them. The 5800X is on par with the 3D version in terms of power consumption, being cooler by a considerable 10 degrees. 2 CCDs with six cores are still hotter than 8 cores concentrated in one CCD. Even at lower voltage 5900X is hotter than 5800X. 12900K is still hot. It is somehow unpleasant to realize that modern top-end processors cannot be cooled with a good, but ordinary liquid cooling system. You need to either undervolt them, or let the automation throttling due to reaching critical temperatures.

  Tests in games

  In Cyberpunk, the 5800X3D kept its lead among ryzens after overclocking. However, their gap has narrowed, and the 12900K with DDR4 has overtaken and overtaken the new product. The gap between 5900X and 5800X also increased, even disabling SMT did not save it. nine0005

  Also released in Far Cry. All FPS 5800X3D scores increased by only 2 units, while the rest of the participants received a much larger increase. The 12900K greedily snatched the lead from the novelty, beating it by 12% with both memory options. And disabling SMT almost helped the 5900X reach the cache-rich octa-core level.

  In Lara, the 48% advantage in average FPS 5800X3D over the regular version has been reduced to 31%. Again, the 3D map barely changed its result. But the margin of its performance was so great that the leadership was not lost. Maybe it’s time to beat Lara in 300 FPS? nine0005

  After tuning, 5800X and 5900X equalized in Starcraft. Previously, the 12-core was slightly ahead. 3D did not change its FPS in any of the indicators. Monolith! But disabling SMT on the 5900X allows you to essentially get the result issued on Windows 10.

  In Troy, after setting the memory to 5800X3D, the FPS still grew by 5%. At the same time, on a regular 5800X, the increase was almost 8%, but we also overclocked the cores. The 5900X accelerated much more significantly. By as much as 19%. That is, in addition to memory, there is a strong emphasis on the performance of the cores themselves, and therefore the fat cache does not particularly give anything. But SMT gives as much as 20% to a 12-core. nine0005

  In Contra, in general, everyone has almost the same results as in stock. The 12900K improved its result by as much as 2% due to a similar overclocking of the cores, but the PBO setting through the Curve Optimizer for ryzens for some reason did not give anything in this game, as did disabling SMT. It even got worse.

  Here it would seem, Hunt is like Lara. 64 additional MB of cache gave a lot, which means that it became just right for us, but no. Memory overclocking on 5800X3D gave a 7% increase. I mean, it’s still not enough. On other ryzens, of course, more. 15-16%, but no one took away the championship from 3D. Disabling SMT this time gave an increase, albeit a penny. Only 5% on average FPS. nine0005

  On average, the 5800X3D is not so cool anymore. It bypasses the regular version not by 25%, but only by 18%. I would like to compare them at an equal frequency, but since it cannot be adjusted in 3D, this will not work. i9 with DDR4 outperformed it, and the 12-core 5900X is not far away. However, this is still the most productive ryzen in games, capable of periodically outperforming all existing processors, and at the same time being cheaper than top solutions, especially when you consider the price of the motherboard, processor, memory kit. nine0005

  Yes, overclocking the memory does almost nothing for him, because the reduction in cache misses means fewer accesses to the RAM. We are less dependent on it. On average, there was only a 3% increase, but at the same time, this is a plus for those who do not want to overclock.

  However, this does not mean that you can completely forget about memory. Yes, in counter FPS drops by only 2%, even if instead of two modules in overclocking one is used in JEDEC, however, in Far Cry, the average FPS is already reduced by 10%, and for frametime or less than 1 and 0.1%, you can notice drawdowns, apparently during uploads. nine0005

  In Cyberpunk or Troy, memory is still very important. In them, FPS drops not by 2 or 10%, but by almost 2 times. Therefore, you need to know the measure. Memory with good XMP will give you about 95% performance in games with this processor, which is very convenient.

  Conclusion

  So, in summary, what about the Ryzen 7 5800X3D V-Cache? This is a processor capable of delivering FPS at the level and even higher than the flagship stones for a much lower cost. It is less demanding on the motherboard and RAM compared to the regular version, but it is also very hot. nine0005

  Comparison of Intel and AMD processors: what to choose

  There are a lot of manufacturers of computer equipment and components in the world. However, there is no diversity in terms of processors — it’s either Intel or AMD. These companies divided the market approximately equally. Every computer, be it a modest office computer or a powerful gaming computer, has one of these chips installed. The debate about which of them is better has not subsided since the birth of the two companies. The eternal battle of red and blue (these are the brand colors of AMD and Intel) has been going on for a long time and to no avail. It is pointless to try to accept one of the parties, since both companies have their own advantages and produce products in demand. It would be more correct to compare samples of Intel and AMD chips, note their features and working qualities. nine0005

  Gaming performance

  In terms of power and performance, Intel processors are at the forefront. High-end models stand out — Core i9, slightly less fast, but cheaper Core i8. There is a belief among users that the Core i5 will be the best option in terms of price and power.

  At the same time, there are some points that change the overall picture. You can’t just buy and install the flagship Core i9 processor in a PC. He needs an appropriate environment, which also costs a lot of money. The total price of a computer built for Core i9, is too high.

  At the same time, AMD chips are able to provide quite decent performance, but do not cost too much. Not only that, the integrated graphics from this company often provide a fully functional replacement for discrete graphics cards. That is, yielding in general positions, AMD retains its niche in the sector of budget or popular models.

  Performance in workloads

  Until recently, the leadership of AMD models in resolving workloads was not subject to any doubt. However, with the release of the new Intel Alder Lake model, the market situation has changed significantly. Blue managed not only to improve the working properties of the product, but also to provide it with an interesting cost for the mass user. nine0005

  AMD’s most powerful models continue to perform well in multi-threaded scenarios. However, this advantage is achieved by increasing the number of threads and cores, increasing the cache. The result is an increase in price, which limits demand among most users.

  The success of the new Intel Alder Lake model is based on the use of two types of cores. P-kernels have high performance and do an excellent job with the same type of tasks. E-cores are energy efficient and perform well in background tasks (especially when developing content). Therefore, if you need performance, it is better to take a high-level Intel. AMD models usually run in low-end office machines, although there are higher-end products in the company’s range. nine0005

  Energy efficiency and heat dissipation

  These two indicators are directly related to each other. Energy efficiency is determined by the type of microarchitecture of the chip, in particular, by the features of the used technical process. The level of heat dissipation is determined by energy efficiency — the less energy is wasted, the less parasitic heating.

  The new Intel Alder Lake processor shows low power consumption, which is noticeably different from the parameters of older models. However, blue has not yet managed to achieve a decisive advantage over AMD models. The 7nm process gives the reds a massive advantage, delivering more work per watt of power. AMD Ryzen 5000 models, which are the absolute leaders in energy efficiency, demonstrate maximum energy efficiency. The blue actions are being taken in the right direction, but they have not yet been able to catch up with the red ones. AMD does not stand still and is no less actively engaged in the development of new models, mastering new level technical processes. Experts soon predict the achievement of some parity, but only technical limitations become its reason. There are no fundamentally fresh developments yet, and the championship remains with AMD. nine0005

  Overclocking

  In terms of overclocking (possibility of overclocking the chip above the nominal values), the blue ones traditionally lead. Intel processors provide their owners with a noticeable increase in capabilities by increasing the clock speed compared to the default settings. The difference between the stock and received frequencies can be quite significant, and the performance of the processor will noticeably grow.

  However, the maximum effect can only be achieved on certain processor models. You will need to buy an expensive model of the K series with an unlocked multiplier (optimized for overclocking), connect it to a motherboard based on the Z chipset, install an efficient (and very expensive) cooling system. These measures will require considerable financial expenses, which calls into question the meaning of the overclocking procedure itself — the money spent could be spent on buying a more powerful processor. nine0005

  AMD is more reserved about overclocking. The potential of red processors in this regard is much less, but the requirements for hardware are much more modest. In addition, the set of functions includes Precision Boost Overdrive, which allows you to overclock the processor in just one click. Therefore, you have to choose between expensive, but overclocking-optimized Intel models, or cheap AMD models that do not provide any special changes.

  Technology

  Not so long ago, AMD made a leap forward — introduced support for PCIe 4.0. SSD solid state drives, as well as graphics cards with support for high-speed technologies, immediately became the highlight of the year. The breakthrough turned out to be devastating for the blues — even 10th generation processors were not able to work with the new PCIe 4.0 SSD and DDR 4 RAM. Their owners felt cut off from modern technologies, which caused them serious reputational problems — having a flagship-level processor, the user cannot apply revolutionary developments. nine0005

  However, soon the blue managed to reverse the situation. Together with the new Intel Alder Lake processor, they introduced support for PCIe 5.0, as well as the ability to work with DDR 5 RAM. Now the reds are lagging behind — their technologies have become obsolete. At the same time, new Intel technologies have not changed the company’s usual approach to their developments — the cost of motherboards turned out to be too high, and DDR 5 capabilities were practically unused. New processors can also work with DDR 4, and this is done for a reason. Buying the latest RAM boards is expensive, not all users will want to do this. Therefore, the blue ones made a more flexible move and expanded the capabilities of the processors according to the market conditions. nine0005

  Today AMD has a 7nm process, which is not yet available in blue. However, the new Intel Alder Lake processor managed to narrow the gap noticeably, coming quite close to AMD’s designs.

  Today, the situation persists — the AMD process technology is superior to the blue ones, and the modern Intel Alder Lake processor is too expensive. So far, it may not be an impressive enough step forward.

  Price

  In terms of value, the leadership belongs to the Reds for a long time. AMD processors have always been characterized by a relatively low price, equipped with an efficient cooling system with free software. Integrated graphics from AMD has become a common feature of office computers, inexpensive and quite efficient. In addition, Red products have some overclocking ability, which increases their functionality. The procedure is very simple, relatively safe, and is performed in just a couple of steps. Overclocking is performed using the Precision Boost Overdrive function, sewn into the standard processor drivers. nine0005

  The Blues responded by introducing the new Alder Lake-S, which significantly narrowed the price gap between the two companies’ products. However, the Reds responded by lowering the price of their most popular product, the AMD Ryzen 5000, leveling the playing field. Therefore, there are no fundamental changes in the sphere of pricing yet.