Intel Xeon E5-1650 vs Intel Xeon E5-2689 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 vs Intel Xeon E5-2689
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Xeon E5-1650 on one side and the Intel Xeon E5-2689 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the server sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,8GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Xeon E5-1650 | Intel Xeon E5-2689 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Server | Server | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Sandy Bridge | Sandy Bridge | ||||||
| Core name | Sandy Bridge-EP | Sandy Bridge-EP | ||||||
| Family | Xeon E5-1600 | Xeon E5-2600 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
CM8062101102002, |
CM8062101163000, |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2012 | Q1 2012 | ||||||
| Lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 2. 270.000.000 |
2.270.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 6 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 12 | 16 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,2 GHz | 2,6 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,8 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
| Bus speed | 5 GT/s | 8 GT/s | ||||||
| Cache memory | 12 MB | 20 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 256 GB | 384 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600 |
DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 51,2 GB/s | 51,2 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 40 | 40 | ||||||
| TDP | 130 W | 115 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 650W ATX Power Supply | 650W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | None | ||||||
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA2011 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 2011 Motherboard | Socket LGA 2011 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 64°C | 85°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 454 | 368 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 3. 350 |
3.472 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 140 | 75 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.141 | 1.053 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.730 | 1.553 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 8.087 | 9.756 | ||||||
| (Linux 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
3.306 | 3.342 | ||||||
| (Linux 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
13.434 | 20.436 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
152,9 GFLOPS | 313,3 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
103 pts / W | 178 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Xeon E5-2689 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Xeon E5-1650 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Xeon E5-2689 is less. Both were produced in the same year.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
368 3.472 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 |
454 3.350 |
In single core, the difference is 23%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 |
140 1.  141 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
75 1.053 |
In single core, the difference is 87%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 8%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
1.553 9.  756 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 |
1.730 8.087 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 21%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
3.056 20.527 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 |
3.  12216.489 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 24%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
3.342 20.436 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 |
3.306 13.434 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 52%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
3.012 21.101 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 |
3.049 15.964 |
In single core, the difference is 1%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 32%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
Intel Xeon E5-1650 AMD equivalentIntel Xeon E5-2689 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2680Dual Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2Dual Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3Dual Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4Dual Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4Dual Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3Dual Intel Xeon E5-2683 v4Dual Intel Xeon E5-2686 v3Dual Intel Xeon E5-2686 v4Dual Intel Xeon E5-2687WDual Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2Dual Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3Dual Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4Intel Xeon E5-2680Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3Intel Xeon E5-2683 v4Intel Xeon E5-2686 v3Intel Xeon E5-2686 v4Intel Xeon E5-2687WIntel Xeon E5-2687W v2Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 vs Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 vs Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 on one side and the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the server sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,6GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Server | Server | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Sandy Bridge | Ivy Bridge | ||||||
| Core name | Sandy Bridge-EP | Ivy Bridge-EP | ||||||
| Family | Xeon E5-2600 | Xeon E5-1600 v2 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
CM8062101163000, |
CM8063501292204, |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2012 | Q3 2013 | ||||||
| Lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 4. 540.000.000 |
1.400.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 16 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 32 | 12 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,6 GHz | 3,5 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,6 GHz | 3,9 GHz | ||||||
| Bus speed | 16 GT/s | 5 GT/s | ||||||
| Cache memory | 40 MB | 12 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 768 GB | 256 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600 |
DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600/1866 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 102,4 GB/s | 59,7 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 80 | 40 | ||||||
| TDP | 230 W | 130 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 750W ATX Power Supply | 650W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | None | ||||||
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA2011 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 2011 Motherboard | Socket LGA 2011 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 85°C | 70°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 229 | 423 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 4. 718 |
3.196 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 165 | 144 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 2.360 | 1.108 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 320 | 310 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 4.740 | 2.267 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.602 | 1.929 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 16.518 | 9.055 | ||||||
| (Linux 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
3.101 | 3.783 | ||||||
| (Linux 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
36. 546 |
18.168 | ||||||
| (Linux) Geekbench 5 single core |
757 | 835 | ||||||
| (Linux) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
10.129 | 4.742 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
543,78 GFLOPS | 250,5 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
159 pts / W | 140 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 is bigger, that the PDT of Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 is lower. The Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
229 4.  718 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 |
423 3.196 |
In single core, the difference is -46%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 48%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
165 2.360 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 |
144 1.  108 |
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 113%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
320 4.740 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 |
310 2.  267 |
In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 109%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
1.602 16.518 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 |
1.929 9.  055 |
In single core, the difference is -17%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 82%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
2.860 26.134 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 |
3.962 19.844 |
In single core, the difference is -28%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 32%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
3.101 36.546 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 |
3.783 18.168 |
In single core, the difference is -18%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 101%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
2.686 30.595 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 |
3.877 19.676 |
In single core, the difference is -31%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 55%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
683 7.839 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 |
838 4.913 |
In single core, the difference is -18%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 60%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
757 10.129 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 |
835 4.742 |
In single core, the difference is -9%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 114%.
On macOS:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon E5-2689 |
594 6.496 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 |
837 4.705 |
In single core, the difference is -29%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 38%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.