Download userbenchmark: UserBenchmark: PC Speed Test Tool

UserBenchmark Free Download for Windows 10/7 PC & Laptop

Accurately Test your PC speed and performance.

Do you want to test your CPU, GPU, SSD, or Motherboard performance, or compare test results with other PC or Laptop users? Then download Userbenchmark, a free and reliable benchmarking tool.

It’s a free benchmark and PC speed test tool. You can run benchmark tests on hardware i.e. GPU, CPU, hard disk, or USB. You can evaluate your PC performance and compare motherboards strength with other users on user benchmark. com.

Download UserBenchmark latest full version for Windows 10, Windows 7, & Windows Vista PC. This is an offline installer setup file for Userbenchmarks and will work for both 32-bit and 64-bit operating systems.

Download User benchmark for Windows 10 & 7 PC 2022

The best part about the UserBenchmark tool is that it shows performance results in terms of scores. A high score shows that PC hardware is performing at an optimum level.

Before you download any game just ask “can I run it on my PC”, get the answer download the free user benchmark latest version. It is a system utility that provides a very easy-to-understand report.

Test Your PC Performance

Did you ever ask yourself that can my PC run any app or do you want to build a new PC to run the game or do you simply want to test your hardware performance?

Then you should definitely need a reliable PC benchmarking tool. Anyhow it’s also a good activity to test your PC hardware and see if they are capable to run the app.

For those who don’t know, what is Benchmarking process? It’s a process that runs different sets of tests on PC hardware to know its capabilities and limits.

The object behind this is to check whether the computer’s components can handle stress while running heavy resolution games or advanced software.

This PC speed test tool is very simple to run. Whether you are an expert or a complete novice, you can easily understand what its details are about.

After user benchmark download and install, execute this tool. A window will appear displaying processor, graphics, fixed drives, memory, and USB drives. These boxes are pre-checked so it pretty much solves most of the problem. Just hit the RUN button and wait for a minute.

A Safe Benchmarking Tool for Windows PC

Is userbenchmark safe you ask? This GPU benchmark tool is safe to use. Although some users report that user bench mark tests are really bad.

The reason they are saying this is that they need to improve report analysis. This Windows CPU benchmark tool compares each individual hardware with the latest standard component.

The software first runs the CPU benchmark and determines its current base clock speed. Then it starts independent tests for floating-point, integer, and mixed performance.

Most Comprehensive PC Test Tool

To determine GPU strength UserBench runs a series of tests like intensive 3D graphics tests. During GPU benchmark it measures GPU’s rendering and overall computational throughput.

After that UserBenchmark runs a hard drive test. This SSD/HDD benchmark test includes sequential, random, 4K, and deep queue access. In this stage read, write, and mixed IO speeds are measured along with SATA connection speed.

At this stage, the UserBenchmark starts the RAM benchmark. Single and multiple core bandwidth tests are carried out which is followed by a suite of latency tests ranging from L1 CPU cache to physical memory.

In the end, this tool runs a USB benchmark test. First, it determines actual USB connection speed (1.0, 2.0, 2.1, 3.0) and then runs the same suite tests as the hard drive benchmark.

During tests, userbenchmark shows random graphics but once it tests are complete you will be redirected to UserBenchmark’s website for the report. Now you will see which section performed well, including overall performance.

This PC benchmark software can save or copy the result of its test. If you want you can share user benchmark report on Facebook, Twitter, or google plus.

Another amazing feature of user benchmarks is that you can quickly compare the results of your PC test with other PC having similar hardware.

If you scroll down the report and you will notice that it has almost all the necessary detail. After reading this report you will know which software or hardware component needs to upgrade. This way you can enhance your PC performance.

There are three categories in which score is calculated namely Gaming, Desktop, and Workstation. If your PC belongs to the gaming category then user benchmarks will calculate score depending upon how good/bad your GPU is.

On the other hand, desktop PC performance is judged according to routine-wise tasks. Whereas, workstation PC’s score depends upon multi-core processing ability.

User benchmark Reliable Benchmarking Tool for Windows

In my view, userbenchmark does deliver what it claims. It makes it really easy to check the system’s performance. It’s a great tool for running PC hardware tests on Windows OS. User benchmark also offers its user an online guide. This guide is for those who don’t have knowledge about benchmark tests.

Furthermore, you can get a lot of tips and suggestions while surfing on the official website. Using this, you can easily build a new PC or test your existing PC hardware components.

Download
User Benchmarks
_{2.9.5 for Windows PC}

3.6 (9)

?️ Safe & Secure

Download Specs

License: Free
Platform: Windows OS
Language: English
File Size: 8.0 MB
Downloads: 4,672
Developer: Userbenchmark.com

Download UserBenchmark 3.3.9 — SnapFiles

Download UserBenchmark 3. 3.9

You may need to right-click on the download link and select «Save as…»

	XYplorer Trial multi-tabbed dual pane file manager	Editor: Users : (22)
	GoodSync Trial file synchronization tool	Editor: Users : (3)
	PrivaZer Free In-depth privacy cleaner	Editor: Users : (13)
	Christmas Elf Trial Christmas decorations for your desktop	Editor: Users :
	Macrorit Disk Scanner Free Free scan your drives for bad sectors	Editor: Users :
	Backup4all Trial backup your files	Editor: Users : (5)
	NirLauncher Free 100+ portable system utilities	Editor: Users : (9)
	Wise Care 365 Free Free all-in-one system utility	Editor: Users : (4)
	Wise Registry Cleaner Free Free find and fix registry errors	Editor: Users : (11)
	Balabolka Free Text-To-Speech program	Editor: Users : (5)

The Better User Testing Tool — Pay as You Go

Userfeel has advanced features without an expensive subscription.

Fast work

Get results in less than 24 hours. Benefit from an extensive network of testers around the world. Learn how users interact with your site or application, both early in the project and whenever you need a user perspective.

Screening

To make sure you’re getting feedback from user testers that matches your target audience exactly, we offer the ability to select demographics (age, gender, location, language, and web experience) and security questions to get specific answers to your needs (for example, if you only want users who have bought shoes online before)

Teamwork

You can create well-structured projects to accomplish a given task by adding any number of participants to each of these projects. Each project member can add comments to videos and categorize issues by their type (usability issue, technical error, general observations, user comments). nine0003

Demonstration video

The best way to evaluate test results and present the results to your team members is to use demonstration videos that highlight the most critical points. Userfeel helps you create videos like this in minutes. You won’t have to wait for several hours and you can download the resulting video to your computer or add it to your YouTube account, from where you can always share the video with anyone. nine0003

See all features

To make sure you’re getting feedback from user testers that is exactly right for your target audience, we offer the ability to select demographics (age, gender, location, language, and web experience) and security questions to get specific answers to your questions. needs (for example, if you only need users who have bought shoes online before)

Each project member can add comments to videos and categorize problems by their type (usability problem, technical error, general observations, user comments).

The book «How to test in Google» — free electronic version / Sudo Null IT News

The book describes the testing of software products at Google: how processes are organized, how teams are organized, what techniques are used, who is responsible for quality. The principles upon which testing at Google is built apply to projects and companies of any size. The authors of the book have worked on Google products themselves, creating testing tools, setting up processes, and doing actual testing. nine0003

The book is intended for professionals in the software development industry: testers, programmers, managers.

Excerpt. Risk reduction

Rarely is it possible to completely eliminate risks. We drive a car, even though it’s dangerous, but we have to get to work, don’t we? In general, the possibility of an accident does not mean that it will definitely happen, and, most likely, nothing terrible will happen. Why? Because by our actions we reduce the possible risk. For example, do not drive while intoxicated and do not drive in low visibility conditions. This is how we reduce risks. nine0003

In software development, the simplest thing is to avoid risky areas: the less code, the less risk. But besides using the «axe and axe», we can do a lot more to reduce the risks:

We can work through user stories around the most risky opportunities, identify the safest paths and show them to developers so that they introduce more restrictions into the application.
We can write regression test cases to make sure we catch repeated crashes. nine0048
We can write and run tests to confirm the need to add a restore and rollback mechanism.
We can add controls and watchdog code to quickly detect failures.
We can add tools that will track changes in the behavior of the product in different versions. We’ll get a signal if there’s a regression bug.

The specific solution depends on the characteristics of the application, on the user’s expectations regarding its security and reliability. As testers, of course, we can be involved in the process of risk reduction, but we are certainly involved in the process of identifying them. We start by prioritizing the features marked in red in the table. We want to test in descending order of risk. This is important: if you can’t test everything, test the most important first. And the most important thing is what is most exposed to the most serious risks. nine0003

In some projects, it is the testers who are asked about the readiness of the product for release. A good tester only needs to take a look at the heat map to determine whether the product should still be kept in the oven or it is time to serve it on the table. If we are talking about the launch of an experimental Google Labs, then the presence of red risk zones is not so significant, if they are not related to security, of course. And if this is a release of a new version of Gmail, then even the yellow zones are a serious danger. Such a simple color gradation is clear to everyone, even top managers. nine0003

Risk concerns subside over time, and a high volume of successful testing is a good sign that the risks are at an acceptable level. Here we benefit from associating test cases with individual product features and then with attributes and components in the risk table. For this case, ACC Analysis is perfect, and that’s why we created this tool just like that.

James Whittaker Ten Minute Test Plan

Any software development problem that can be solved in ten minutes is considered easy or unworthy of attention. Suppose we believe this, then what can we say about test planning? Of course, the fact that it takes more than ten minutes. When I was the director of testing at Google, I led several teams that created a huge amount of test plans. Answers to the question of how long it would take to compile it could be: «tomorrow», «by the end of the week» and only a couple of times — «by the end of the day» (if the task was announced early in the morning). Okay, let’s take into account that the preparation of a test plan takes a certain number of hours, or even days. nine0006 Whether such work is worth the effort is another story altogether. I see dozens of test plans that my teams write, and each time they are stillborn documents — they are created, reviewed, updated once or twice (if you’re lucky), and then confidently shelved as soon as the project starts to go wrong, as it was provided. The question arises: if the plan is not worth updating, was it worth
create it?

Sometimes a test plan is not viable because it contains too much or too little detail. Or he contributed to the start of work, but the process is no longer there. And again, a question for connoisseurs: was it worth creating a document with a limited or ever-decreasing value? nine0003

Some test plans contain information that is so obvious that it was not worth documenting. We’re just wasting our time. Let’s face it: we have a problem with test plans.

To deal with this, I came up with a simple task for my team: write a test plan in ten minutes. If it has any value, let’s get to it as soon as possible.

When you have only ten minutes to solve a problem, every second counts. This is my main idea: the time limit forces you to cut off all the husks when planning and concentrate only on important points. Do only what is absolutely necessary, leave the details to the test runners. I wanted to end the vicious
practice of writing unviable test plans, and this exercise seemed right to me.

However, I did not say any of this to the participants in the experiment. I just said, «Here’s the app, make a test plan in no more than ten minutes.» Keep in mind that these people were paid for doing my tasks. Still, I assumed they had a certain amount of respect for me, and therefore knew that I would not entrust them with an impossible task.

They could spend some time getting to know the app, but since it was about the apps they use every week (Google Docs, App Engine, Talk Video, etc.), I gave them very little time to do so. . nine0003

In all cases, the teams invented methods similar to those of ACC analysis. They presented solutions in the form of tables and lists without using large amounts of text. That is, sentences — yes, paragraphs of text — no. They did not waste time formatting the text, did not go into unnecessary explanations. All test plans had one thing in common — the teams documented the possibilities. They admitted that it was the best decision to spend their very limited time.

Okay, no team completed the test plan on time. Nevertheless, they managed to walk through the attributes and components in ten minutes and began to isolate the capabilities of the product under study. By the end of the extra twenty minutes, most of my test subjects had written down a fairly large set of possibilities that would serve as a great starting point.0037
when creating test cases and user stories.

It seems to me that the experiment was a success. I gave them ten minutes, although I was guided by an hour. As a result, 80% of the work was completed in half an hour. Isn’t that enough? We know for sure that we will not test everything, so why do we need to document everything? We know very well that during testing, many things (schedules, requirements, architecture) will change. There is no point in insisting on meticulous planning accuracy when finality is not required at all. nine0003

Eighty percent of the job done in thirty minutes or less. Now that’s what I call a ten-minute test plan!

A word on risks

Google Test Analytics uses the risk assessment criteria described above (“very rarely”, “rarely”, “sometimes”, “often”) as a basis. We specifically do not want to make risk analysis a complex task, otherwise it will not be completed. We are not interested in exact mathematical details, because the numbers mean little. It is enough to know that «A» is riskier than «B», regardless of the exact value of the risks. Simply knowing which opportunity is riskier than the other will allow the test manager to distribute the work of the testers more efficiently. And people like Patrick Copeland can easily decide how many testers to assign to each development team. Understanding risks benefits the entire company. nine0003

Risk analysis is a discipline in its own right and respected in many industries. We use a simplified version of the methodology, but this does not prevent us from being interested in new research in order to improve our testing approach. If you want to learn more about risk analysis, then start with the Risk Management article on Wikipedia.

GTA helps identify risks, and testing helps reduce them. The tester serves as an intermediary in this process. It can run internal tests on some of the riskiest areas, or challenge developers and developers in testing to add regression tests. It has other tools in its arsenal: exploratory testing, internal and beta user acquisition, and the strength of an external community. nine0003

It is the tester’s responsibility to be aware of all risk-prone areas. He should try to reduce the risks by any means that are subject to him. Here are a few tips that we find helpful in dealing with risk.

For the riskiest features and attribute/component pairs marked in red, write a set of user stories, use cases, or test guides. At Google, the tester is responsible for the most risky opportunities. He can coordinate his work with colleagues, use different tools, but personal responsibility is still on him. nine0048
Carefully study everything that was done on testing by developers and developers in testing before you. How did the results affect the risks identified by the GTA? Was this testing well organized in terms of risk management? Should new tests be added? The tester may need to add these tests himself or contact the developers. Ultimately, it is important that the tests are written, not who writes them.
Review the bugs found for each high-risk attribute/component pair and verify that appropriate regression tests are written for each. Bugs tend to come back when the code changes. nine0048
Be more attentive to high-risk areas — take an interest in the recovery and rollback mechanisms. Consider the possible negative impact on the user when they face the worst-case scenario. Discuss such situations with other engineers, check the feasibility of these scenarios. A tester who often shouts “Wolf!” will soon be no longer listened to. Loud warnings about possible dangers are acceptable only for high-risk scenarios, which are also recognized as realistic and have already been covered by tests. nine0048
Involve as many people as possible who are interested in the success of the project. Internal users should be bothered about feedback, otherwise they will simply use the system, ignoring certain errors. Ask them to do specific experiments, ask them questions like “How does it work on your machine?” or “How would you use such a feature?”. Google employees are heavily involved in testing, and they need to be actively directed to test, not just use the products. nine0048
If none of the mechanisms work, and the component at risk is still undertested, and even constantly crashes, try to get the element removed. Congratulations! You had a chance to explain the concept of risk analysis to the management and emphasize the importance of testers on the project.

Custom scripts

Jason Arbon

User stories describe real or simulated ways in which users use an application. They describe what users want, look at the product through their eyes, without considering the application architecture and implementation details. nine0003

Stories can be associated with opportunities, but only superficially, since they are still subject to user actions. The user needs something, and the story describes how they use the app to get it. Stories are intentionally described in a general way, without specific steps, without hard-coded input data. Only what the user will do and how to reproduce it during application testing.

When creating a user story, we look at the product only through the user interface, we do not include technical details in the description. Then the tester will go through this path differently each time, just as different users solve the same problem in our application in different ways — that’s the main idea! nine0003

The main thing in user stories is the value of the product for the user. These are not test cases with their specific inputs and expected outcomes. It’s good practice to create separate accounts. We at Google often create lots of test accounts for the users described in the stories. Old accounts can be useful in another way: when testing Google Documents, we found the most interesting bugs just for old accounts — when loading documents created in previous versions in the new version. nine0003

We try to make testers change when they run these scenarios. The more different ways to pass, the better.

We won’t be too picky about low-risk opportunities. We may decide that writing test cases for these areas is too expensive. Instead, we can limit ourselves to exploratory testing or leave it to crowdsource testing. To manage the work of testers from the external community, we often use the concept of tours — these are high-level instructions for exploratory testing. Simply put, this approach gives your request the right specifics. For example, asking the community to «Do a FedEx tour for such and such a set of features» will get a much better result than simply giving away the application and hoping for the best. We immediately identify the features that need to be tested and give instructions on how to do it. nine0003

Crowdsourcing

James Whittaker

Crowdsourcing is a new phenomenon in testing. If there are not enough testers, and their resources are limited, then crowdsource testing is in a hurry to help! There are many more users with different sets of devices and software configurations than there are testers. We can only dream of such a large number of test environments. Surely there will be those who want to help us?

Let’s imagine that there is a group of experienced users who understand testing and agreed to help us for a reasonable fee. All they need is access to an environment where they can work with the application and a well-functioning mechanism for providing feedback and bug reports. For projects like our open source Chromium, testing with a large group of people is ideal. However, for projects that are open only within the company, this is more problematic. It is necessary to select testers who enjoy special trust. nine0003

Another key value of crowdsourcing (besides the many configurations) is a broader view of the application. Instead of one tester imitating the actions of a thousand users, we have a thousand users acting as testers. Is there a better way to find scripts that are causing an application to crash than to immediately issue those scripts to users and get feedback? Diversity and scale are the value of crowdsourcing.

People who want to test the software product are in abundance, and they are available around the clock. Let’s say given: top 1000 sites, task: test them in the latest version of Chrome, then solution: 1 tester = 1000 iterations or 20 testers = 50 iterations. Mathematics on the side of crowdsourcing. nine0003

The main disadvantage of community testing is that it takes time for them to get to grips with the application and figure out how best to approach testing. Most of this time is wasted due to the amount of people, but we figured out how to deal with it. For Chrome, for example, we wrote tours and external testers followed them for exploratory testing and user scripting (see Appendix B, Chrome Test Tours for examples). Tours immediately directed testers to the right parts of the application and gave the necessary instructions. The trick is to make different sets of tours and distribute them among the participants. So we avoided the “bring that, I don’t know what” option and got exactly what we asked for. nine0003

Crowdsource testing is the next step in the development of Google’s standard channels: canary channel, development channel, test channel, and internal product channel. It’s our way of getting early adopters and people who just enjoy finding and reporting bugs. We have already tried to recruit testers within the company among our colleagues who like to work with a fresh product, connect people from supplier companies to the teams, use the services of commercial crowdsourcing companies (for example, uTest). We even launched a program to reward the best bug finders. nine0003

So, the power of ACC analysis is that we get a list of product features that can be ordered by risk and assigned to different performers. Testers working on the same project may get different sets of features to test.