AMD FX-8300 vs AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF
|
|
|
|
|
AMD FX-8300 vs AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD FX-8300 on one side and the AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD FX-8300 | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Piledriver | Zen+ | ||||||
| Core name | Vishera | Pinnacle Ridge | ||||||
| Family | FX-8000 | Ryzen 3 1000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
FD8300WMW8KHK, |
YD1200BBAFBOX |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2012 | Q2 2020 | ||||||
| Lithography | 32 nm SOI | 12 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 1. 200.000.000 |
4.800.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,3 GHz | 3,1 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,2 GHz | 3,4 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 8 MB | 8 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR3-1866 |
DDR4-2667 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 29,9 GB/s | 42,7 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 20 | ||||||
| TDP | 95 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | None | ||||||
| Socket | AM3+ | AM4, PGA-1331 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM3+ Motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 70. 5°C |
95°C | ||||||
| Crypto engine |
— |
Advanced Encryption Standard instructions |
||||||
| Security |
— |
Enhanced Virus Protection, |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 235 | 433 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1.621 | 1.747 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 85 | 150 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 527 | 570 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 453 | 893 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 2. 498 |
3.536 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.474 | 1.931 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 5.242 | 6.287 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
2.632 | 3.765 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
10.261 | 10.868 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
82,8 GFLOPS | 73,7 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
108 pts / W | 167 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD FX-8300 has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD FX-8300 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF is less. The AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF |
433 1.747 |
| AMD FX-8300 |
235 1.621 |
In single core, the difference is 84%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 8%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF |
150 570 |
| AMD FX-8300 |
85 527 |
In single core, the difference is 76%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 8%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF |
893 3.536 |
| AMD FX-8300 |
453 2.498 |
In single core, the difference is 97%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 42%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF |
1.931 6.287 |
| AMD FX-8300 |
1.474 5.  242 |
In single core, the difference is 31%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 20%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF |
3.765 10.868 |
| AMD FX-8300 |
2.632 10.261 |
In single core, the difference is 43%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 6%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF |
3.600 10.870 |
| AMD FX-8300 |
2.690 8.201 |
In single core, the difference is 34%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 33%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF |
3.843 11.047 |
| AMD FX-8300 |
2.546 10.645 |
In single core, the difference is 51%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD FX-8300 Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 3 1200 AF Intel equivalent
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 vs AMD FX-8300
Summary
-
AMD Ryzen 3 1200
109%
-
AMD FX-8300
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 3 1200
134%
-
AMD FX-8300
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 3 1200
100%
-
AMD FX-8300
118%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
Much higher single threaded performance (around 34% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
| This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
Reasons to consider AMD FX-8300 |
| 18% higher multi threaded performance. |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Features
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | AMD FX-8300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| 3DNow! | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSE4A | ||||
| AMD64 | ||||
| CnQ | ||||
| NX bit | ||||
| AMD-V | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
| SSE4.1 | ||||
SSE4. 2 |
||||
| SSE4a | ||||
| AES | ||||
| AVX | ||||
| CLMUL | ||||
| CVT16 | ||||
| EVP | ||||
| FMA4 | ||||
| XOP | ||||
| Turbo Core | ||||
| HT3.1 | ||||
Architecture
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | AMD FX-8300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | AMD Zen | vs | AMD Piledriver | |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR3 | |
| Codename | Zen | vs | Vishera | |
| Release Date | Jun 2017 | vs | Oct 2012 |
Cores
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | AMD FX-8300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | vs | 8 | |
| Threads | 4 | vs | 8 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | No | vs | No |
Cache
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | AMD FX-8300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | vs | 384 KB | |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | vs | 8192 KB | |
| L3 Cache | 8192 KB (shared) | vs | 8192 KB (shared) |
Physical
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | AMD FX-8300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | AMD Socket AM3+ | |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | unknown | |
| Package | uPGA | vs | uPGA | |
| Die Size | 192mm² | vs | 315mm² | |
| Process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm |
Performance
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | AMD FX-8300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3100 MHz | vs | 3300 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | 3400 MHz | vs | 3900 MHz | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | |
| Voltage | unknown | vs | 1. 425 V |
|
| TDP | 65 W | vs | 95 W |
-
AMD Ryzen 3 1200
3740 points
-
AMD FX-8300
2379 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 3 1200
13640 points
-
AMD FX-8300
13205 points
Points — higher is better
points — higher is better
points — higher is better
| VS | ||
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | Intel Pentium Gold G6600 |
| VS | ||
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | Intel Core i7-1068G7 |
| VS | ||
| AMD FX-8300 | AMD Ryzen 5 3580U |
| VS | ||
| AMD FX-8300 | Intel Core i7-10710U |
| VS | ||
| AMD Athlon Gold 3150GE | AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE |
| VS | ||
| AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE | AMD Athlon Gold 3150G |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.