AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs. AMD FX-8350
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.70 GHz base 3.65 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 (LGA 1331) CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 12 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Raven Ridge (Zen) Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q1/2018
AMD FX-8350
The AMD FX-8350 operates with 8 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 4.20 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 125 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q4/2012
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD FX-8350
Compare Detail
| 3.50 GHz | Frequency | 4.00 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 3.70 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.20 GHz |
| 3.65 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 4.10 GHz |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking | Yes |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
|
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics |
GPU | no iGPU |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 14 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 12 | DirectX Version | |
| 3 | Max. displays | |
| DDR4-2933 | Memory | |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No | ECC | Yes |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
4. 00 MB |
L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | |
| 12 | PCIe lanes | |
| 14 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| AM4 (LGA 1331) | Socket | AM3+ |
| 65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Q1/2018 | Release date | Q4/2012 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms.
The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.
5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D.
The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | AMD FX-8350 | |
| 65 W | Max TDP | 125 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
Porovnání AMD FX-8350 vs.
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Porovnání procesorů
Detail procesoru
Fotogalerie
Kde koupit?
Zobrazit recenze
Detail procesoru
Fotogalerie
Kde koupit?
Zobrazit recenze
Celkové hodnocení
PORAŽENÝ
VÍTĚZ
Nejlepší poměr cena/výkon
REMÍZA
REMÍZA
Obecné
Výrobce
AMD
AMD
Výrobní technologie
32 nm
14 nm
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G má efektivnější technologii výroby než AMD FX-8350
Příkon (TDP)
125 W
65 W
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G má o 48 % nižší příkon než AMD FX-8350
Patice (Socket)
AMD AM3+
AMD AM4
Počet jader a vláken
Počet jader procesoru
AMD FX-8350 má 2x více jader než AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Počet výpočetních vláken
AMD FX-8350 má 2x více výpočetních vláken než AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Frekvence
Základní frekvence procesoru
4 GHz
3,5 GHz
AMD FX-8350 má o 14 % vyšší základní frekvenci než AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Maximální frekvence (Boost)
neuvedeno
3,7 GHz
Možnost taktování
neuvedeno
ano
Výkon
Celkové skóre procesoru
6 024
6 771
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G má obecně o 12 % vyšší celkový výkon než AMD FX-8350
Skóre jednoho vlákna
1 580
2 059
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G má o 30 % vyšší výkon na jednom výpočetním vlákně než AMD FX-8350
Skóre herní fyziky
1 337
1 678
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G má o 26 % vyšší výkon při výpočtu herní fyziky než AMD FX-8350
Operační paměť
Podporovaný typ paměti
neuvedeno
DDR4
Maximální počet kanálů
neuvedeno
2
Grafická karta
Integrovaná grafická karta
neuvedeno
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Základní frekvence graf.
karty
neuvedeno
1100 MHz
Chladič
Chladič v balení
neuvedeno
ano
Typ chladiče
neuvedeno
Wraith Stealth
Další funkce a vlastnosti
Produktová řada
AMD FX
AMD Ryzen 3
Mikroarchitektura
Vishera
Zen
Kódový název
neuvedeno
Raven Ridge
Frekvence sběrnice FSB
2000 MHz
neuvedeno
Přibližná cena
Přibližná cena
již se neprodává
již se neprodává
Upozornění: Porovnání těchto produktů je vytvářeno automaticky na základě jejich parametrů, uživatelského hodnocení a ceny. Jedná se o systémové řešení pro usnadnění vašeho výběru, nikoli o přímé doporučení redakce Cena-Vykon.cz. Nalezli jste chybu v parametrech nebo se vám nezdá výsledné hodnocení? Dejte nám vědět!
Uživatelské hodnocení
0 % (
zobrazit recenze)
100 % (
zobrazit recenze)
Celkové hodnocení
PORAŽENÝ
VÍTĚZ
Nejlepší poměr cena/výkon
REMÍZA
REMÍZA
Další srovnání
|
AMD FX-8350 vs. 
|