Q9550 vs 9700k benchmark: Intel Core i7-9700KF vs Core2 Quad Q9550

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Intel Core i7-9700K Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Intel Core i7-9700K

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 on one side and the Intel Core i7-9700K on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,8GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor	Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550	Intel Core i7-9700K
Market (main)	Desktop	Desktop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Penryn	Coffee Lake
Core name	Yorkfield	Coffee Lake-S
Family	Core 2 Quad 9000	Core i7-9000
Part number(s), S-Spec	BX80569Q9550, BXC80569Q9550, AT80569PJ073N, EU80569PJ073N, Q5MV, Q9PT, QGPK, SLAN4, SLAWQ, SLB8V	BX80684I79700K, BXC80684I79700K, CM8068403874212, SRELT, QQPK
Release date	Q1 2008	Q4 2018
Lithography	45 nm	14 nm++
Transistors	820. 000.000	—
Cores	4	8
Threads	4	8
Base frequency	2,8 GHz	3,6 GHz
Turbo frequency	—	4,9 GHz
Cache memory	12 MB	12 MB
Max memory capacity	8 GB	128 GB
Memory types	DDR3-1333	DDR4-2666
Max PCIe lanes	16	16
TDP	95 W	95 W
Suggested PSU	600W ATX Power Supply	600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics	None	Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake)
GPU execution units	—	23
GPU shading units	—	184
GPU base clock	—	350 MHz
GPU boost clock	—	1200 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point	—	423,2 GFLOPS
Socket	LGA775	LGA1151
Compatible motherboard	Socket LGA 775 Motherboard	Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard
Maximum temperature	71. 4°C	100°C
Crypto engine	—	AES New Instructions, Secure Key
Security	—	Software Guard Extensions, Memory Protection Extensions, OS Guard, Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard
Max display resolution	—	4096 x 2304@60Hz
CPU-Z single thread	238	554
CPU-Z multi thread	976	4.158
Cinebench R15 single thread	74	211
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	320	1. 510
Cinebench R23 single thread	441	1.273
Cinebench R23 multi-thread	1.686	9.419
PassMark single thread	1.215	2.908
PassMark CPU Mark	2.261	14.549
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	1.985	6.084
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	5.712	29.763
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	64,2 GFLOPS	424,3 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	60 pts / W	313 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Core i7-9700K has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-9700K is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Core i7-9700K was started more recently.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-9700K	554 4.158
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550	238 976

In single core, the difference is 133%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 326%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-9700K	211 1. 510
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550	74 320

In single core, the difference is 185%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 372%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-9700K	1. 273 9.419
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550	441 1.686

In single core, the difference is 189%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 459%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i7-9700K	2. 908 14.549
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550	1.215 2.261

In single core, the difference is 139%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 543%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i7-9700K	6. 084 29.763
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550	1.985 5.712

In single core, the difference is 206%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 421%.

On Linux 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i7-9700K	6.057 24.055
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550	1.950 4.689

In single core, the difference is 211%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 413%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
Intel Core i7-9700K	6.229 31. 150
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550	2.105 6.076

In single core, the difference is 196%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 413%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 AMD equivalentIntel Core i7-9700K AMD equivalent

CPU-Z Benchmark for Intel Core i7-9700K (1T)

Best CPU performance — 64-bit — February 2023

Intel Core i7-9700K (1T)

Back to validation

Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel Core i7-13700K

Intel Core i9-12900KS

Intel Core i9-12900K

Intel Core i9-12900KF

Intel Core i7-12700KF

Intel Core i7-12700K

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

Intel Core i5-12600K

Intel Core i5-12600KF

Intel Core i7-12700

Intel Core i7-12700F

Intel Core i9-12900H

Intel Core i7-12700H

Intel Core i5-12500

Intel Core i5-12500H

Intel Core i9-11900K

Intel Core i5-12490F

Intel Core i5-12400

Intel Core i3-12100

Intel Core i5-12400F

Intel Core i3-12100F

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Intel Core i7-11700K

Intel Core i7-11700KF

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

Intel Core i5-11600K

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i7-11700

Intel Core i7-11700F

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX

(YOU) Intel Core i7-9700K

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD Ryzen 7 6800H

Intel Core i7-11800H

Intel Core i9-10900K

Intel Core i9-10850K

Intel Core i7-10700KF

Intel Core i5-11400

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

Intel Core i9-9900KF

Intel Core i5-11400F

Intel Core i7-9700KF

Intel Core i5-11400H

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

Intel Core i7-10700K

Intel Core i7-9700K

Intel Core i9-9900K

AMD Ryzen 5 5600H

Intel Core i5-10600KF

Intel Core i5-9600KF

Intel Core i5-10600K

Intel Core i7-10700

Intel Core i5-11300H

Intel Core i7-10700F

Intel Core i7-1165G7

Intel Core i7-9700

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Intel Core i5-9600K

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

Intel Core i7-8700K

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

Intel Core i5-8600K

Intel Core i5-1135G7

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

Intel Core i7-7700K

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

AMD Ryzen 7 5700U

Intel Core i7-8700

AMD Ryzen 5 3500X

AMD Ryzen 5 3500

Intel Core i3-1115G4

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i7-10750H

Intel Core i3-9100F

Intel Core i3-10105F

Intel Core i7-6700K

Intel Core i5-8500

Intel Core i5-10400

Intel Core i5-9400

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i5-6600K

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i7-4790K

Intel Core i3-10100F

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Intel Core i5-10400F

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core

Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Core i5-8400

Intel Core i7-9750H

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Intel Core i7-7700

Intel Core i5-4690K

Intel Core i7-8750H

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i5-9300H

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i3-8100

Intel Core i7-10510U

Intel Core i5-7500

Intel Core i5-8300H

AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

Intel Core i7-8565U

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Intel Core i7-4770K

Intel Core i5-4690

Intel Core i5-10210U

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

Intel Core i7-4790

Intel Core i5-1035G1

Intel Core i7-6700

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Intel Core i7-4770

AMD Ryzen 7 1700

Intel Core i5-8265U

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Intel Core i5-4590

Intel Core i3-1005G1

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with

Intel Core i5-3570K

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Core i5-7400

Intel Core i7-3770K

Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3

Intel Core i7-8550U

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Core i3-7100

AMD Ryzen 3 1200

Intel Core i5-3570

Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3

Intel Core i3-10110U

Intel Core i5-2500K

Intel Core i7-3770

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with

Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Core i7-7700HQ

Intel Core i5-8250U

Intel Core i5-7300HQ

Intel Core i5-6400

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i5-4460

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with

Intel Core i5-4440

Intel Core i3-4170

Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2

Intel Core i5-2500

Intel Pentium G4560

AMD Athlon 3000G

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i3-4160

Intel Xeon E5-2689

Intel Core i7-7500U

Intel Core i7-6700HQ

Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3

Intel Core i3-4130

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2

Intel Core i5-3330

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

Intel Core i5-7200U

Intel Core i3-3240

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Core i5-6300U

Intel Core i3-2120

Intel Core i5-3230M

Intel Core i3-2100

Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Intel Core i5-6200U

Intel Core i5-2520M

Intel Core i5-5200U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

Intel Core i5 650

Intel Core 2 Duo E7500

Intel Core i5-3210M

AMD FX -8350

Intel Core i5-2450M

AMD FX -8320

AMD FX -6300

Intel Core i5-2410M

Intel Core i5-4210U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600

AMD FX -8300

Intel Core i3-7020U

Intel Core i5-4200U

Intel Core i3-5005U

Intel Core i3-6006U

Intel Core i3-4005U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650

Main

&nbsp/&nbsp

CPU Comparison

&nbsp/&nbsp

Overall rating

Issued
Q1/2008

Issued
Q4/2007

Overall rating

What is better to choose Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 or Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their characteristics and benchmark results.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 has a maximum frequency of 2.83 GHz. 4 cores. Power consumption 65 W. Released Q1/2008.

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 has a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz. 4 cores. Power consumption 130 W. Released Q4/2007.

Differences
Characteristics
Benchmarks (tests)
Reviews

Differences

Reasons to choose
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

Report a bug

Positions in benchmark results

General positions of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

Cinebench R23 (Single Core)

369 place
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

349 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

1031 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

878 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

975 place

Reasons to choose
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650

Report a bug

Positions in benchmark results

General positions of Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 CPU in popular benchmarks, to compare with other models.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

1053 place
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

882 place
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

955 place

Characteristics

Technical data

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650

CPU group and family

Reference information on compared processors, series, generation and market segment.

CPU specifications

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, cache size. These parameters indirectly speak about the speed of the processor, the higher they are, the better.

Frequency

2.83GHz 3.00GHz
CPU Cores

4 4
Turbo (1 Core)

No No
Threads

4 4
Turbo (2 Cores)

no turbo no turbo
Hypertrading

No No
Acceleration

No Yes
Kernel architecture

normal normal

RAM & PCI Specifications

Types, number of RAM channels supported by Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550. Higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported depending on motherboards.

Encryption

AES-NI

No No

Power Consumption

Compare the TDP requirements of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 and Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 for cooling system selection. The TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, instruction sets supported by Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550, virtualization technology and process technology.

Instruction set (ISA)

x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization

VT-x, VT-d VT-x, VT-d
ISA Extensions

MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4. 1 MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1
Cash L2

12.00MB 12.00MB
Cash L3

No No
Architecture

Yorkfield Yorkfield
Tech. process

45 nm 45 nm
Socket

LGA 775 LGA 775
Issue

Q1/2008 Q4/2007

Benchmarks (tests)

Benchmarks CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance difference between the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 and the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best processor!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform benchmark for desktop or mobile processors that is memory intensive.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance benchmark for desktop or mobile processors that is memory intensive and multi-threaded.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark physics.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650

Latest comparisons

Intel Core i5-10600K

Intel Core i5-9400H

Intel Core i7-11700

Intel Core i5-9400H

Intel Core i7-10700

Intel Core i5-9400H

Intel Core i5-10400F

Intel Core i5-9400H

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i5-9400H

Intel Core i5-10400F

Intel Core i7-10700

Intel Core i7-9750H

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X

Intel Core i5-12400

AMD Ryzen 9 5900

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i7-11390H

AMD A8-7650K

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i9-13900HX

Apple M2 Max

Intel Core i7-11700K

Intel Core i7-10700KF

AMD A8-3550MX

AMD A10-7350B

Intel Core i5-1235U

Intel Core i7-12700T

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450

Main

&nbsp/&nbsp

CPU Comparison

&nbsp/&nbsp

Overall rating

Issued
Q1/2008

Overall rating

What is better to choose Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 or Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their characteristics and benchmark results.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 has a maximum frequency of 2.83 GHz. 4 cores. Power consumption 65 W. Released Q1/2008.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 has a maximum frequency of 2.66 GHz. 4 cores. Power consumption 95 W. Released Q1/2008.

Differences
Characteristics
Benchmarks (tests)
Reviews