AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G vs Ryzen 3 2200G: performance comparison
VS
AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
We compared two 4-core desktop CPUs: the 3.8 GHz AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G against the 3.5 GHz Ryzen 3 2200G. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G
52
Ryzen 3 2200G
43
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G
21
Ryzen 3 2200G
13
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G
67
Ryzen 3 2200G
45
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G
43
Ryzen 3 2200G
35
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 2200G and 4350G
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G
- More modern manufacturing process – 7 versus 14 nanometers
- Newer — released 2-years and 6-months later
- 22% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1107 vs 906 points
- 8% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4 GHz vs 3. 7 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Unlocked multiplier
Promotion
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G
+23%
1155
Ryzen 3 2200G
939
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G
+67%
5944
Ryzen 3 2200G
3568
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G
+22%
2513
Ryzen 3 2200G
2053
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G
+64%
11025
Ryzen 3 2200G
6708
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G
+23%
1103
Ryzen 3 2200G
898
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G
+50%
4583
Ryzen 3 2200G
3055
Submit your Cinebench R23 result
Specifications
Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G and Ryzen 3 2200G
General
Vendor | AMD | AMD |
Released | July 21, 2020 | February 12, 2018 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Zen 2 (Renoir) | Zen (Raven Ridge) |
Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 6 | Radeon Vega 8 |
P-Cores | 4 | 4 |
P-Threads | 8 | 4 |
Base Frequency (P) | 3. 8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Total Cores | 4 | 4 |
Total Threads | 8 | 4 |
Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 38x | 35x |
L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | 128K (per core) |
L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
L3 Cache | 4MB (shared) | 4MB (shared) |
Unlocked Multiplier | No | Yes |
Package
Transistors | 4. 9 billions | 4.9 billions |
Fabrication process | 7 nm | 14 nm |
TDP (PL1) | 45-65 W (configurable) | 65 W |
Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
Peak temperature | 95°C | 95°C |
Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 | Radeon Vega 8 |
GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
GPU Boost Clock | 1700 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Shading Units | 384 | 512 |
TMUs | 24 | 32 |
ROPs | 8 | 8 |
Execution Units | 6 | 8 |
TGP | 15 W | 65 W |
Max. Resolution | 3840×2160 — 60 Hz | 3840×2160 — 60 Hz |
iGPU FLOPS
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G
0.85 TFLOPS
Ryzen 3 2200G
1.13 TFLOPS
Memory Support
Memory types | — DDR4-3200 | — DDR4-2933 |
Memory Size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. Memory Bandwidth | 43.71 GB/s | 43.71 GB/s |
ECC Support | No | Yes |
Official site | AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G official page | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G official page |
PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express Lanes | 12 | 12 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G
14 (82. 4%)
Ryzen 3 2200G
3 (17.6%)
Total votes: 17
So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G or Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G?
Name
Message
Promotion
Ryzen 3 2200G [in 17 benchmarks]
Summary
AMD started Ryzen 3 2200G sales 7 January 2018 at a recommended price of $99. This is a Raven Ridge architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, and is based on 14 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3700 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is AM4 processor with a TDP of 65 Watt. It supports
DDR4
Dual-channel memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
5.38%
of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 9654.
EPYC9654
Compare
General info
Ryzen 3 2200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
Place in performance ranking | 1111 | |
Place by popularity | 61 | |
Value for money | 13.19 | |
Market segment | Desktop processor | |
Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | |
Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2018) | |
Release date | 7 January 2018 (5 years old) | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | of 305 (Core i7-870) |
Current price | $88 (0.9x MSRP) | of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | |
Threads | 4 | |
Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | of 4.7 (Ryzen 9 7900X) |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | of 6 (Core i9-13900KS) |
L1 cache | 128K (per core) | of 7475.2 (Apple M2 Pro 10-Core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | of 36864 (Apple M2 Max) |
L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | of 768 (EPYC 7773X) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
Die size | 210 mm2 | |
Number of transistors | 4,950 million | of 9900000 (Ryzen 5 7645HX) |
64 bit support | + | |
Windows 11 compatibility | — | |
Unlocked multiplier | 1 |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 2200G compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8160M) |
Socket | AM4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200G. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | |
AES-NI | + | |
FMA | + | |
AVX | + |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
AMD-V | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200G’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel |
of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | of 786 (Xeon E5-2670 v3) |
Max memory channels | 2 | of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221) |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | of 460.8 (EPYC 9654) |
ECC memory support | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of a GPU integrated into Ryzen 3 2200G.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.
PCIe version | 3.0 | of 5 (EPYC 9654) |
PCI Express lanes | 12 | of 128 (EPYC 7401) |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Ryzen 3 2200G. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 3 2200G
5.38
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 3 2200G
6780
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Ryzen 3 2200G
986
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Ryzen 3 2200G
2836
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Ryzen 3 2200G
4625
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen 3 2200G
16684
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen 3 2200G
6636
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Ryzen 3 2200G
7
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ryzen 3 2200G
577
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ryzen 3 2200G
146
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ryzen 3 2200G
1.7
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Ryzen 3 2200G
3.1
x264 encoding pass 1
x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Ryzen 3 2200G
184
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Ryzen 3 2200G
40
WinRAR 4.0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using ‘Best’ setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
Ryzen 3 2200G
3229
Geekbench 4.
0 64-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 3%
Ryzen 3 2200G
11105
Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 3%
Ryzen 3 2200G
4082
Relative perfomance
Overall Ryzen 3 2200G performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.
Intel Pentium Gold G7400
100.19
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
100.19
Intel Core i5-7640X
100.19
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
100
Intel Core i3-9100F
99.81
Intel Core i7-4770S
99.63
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
99.44
Intel equivalent
According to our data, the closest Intel alternative to Ryzen 3 2200G is Core i5-7640X, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 2 positions in our ranking.
Core i57640X
Compare
Here are some closest Intel rivals to Ryzen 3 2200G:
Intel Core i7-6700TE
100.37
Intel Pentium Gold G7400
100.19
Intel Core i5-7640X
100.19
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
100
Intel Core i3-9100F
99.81
Intel Core i7-4770S
99.63
Intel Core i3-9100
98.33
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Core i57640X
Compare
Ryzen 3PRO 2200G
Compare
Core i39100F
Compare
Core i7
6700TE
RyzenEmbedded V1605B
Compare
Core i57600K
Compare
Recommended GPUs
People consider these graphics cards to be good for Ryzen 3 2200G, according to our PC configuration statistics.
Radeon RX
Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
10.7%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
10.3%
Radeon RX
570
5%
GeForce GTX
1650
4.6%
Radeon RX
580
3.5%
GeForce GTX
1050
3%
Radeon RX
550
3%
GeForce GTX
1060 3 GB
2.3%
Radeon RX
560
2.3%
These are the fastest graphics cards for Ryzen 3 2200G in our user configuration statistics.
There is a total of 18696 configurations based on Ryzen 3 2200G in our database.
GeForce RTX
4090
0.3% (64/18696)
GeForce RTX
4080
0.005% (1/18696)
Radeon RX
7900 XTX
0.005% (1/18696)
GeForce RTX
4070 Ti
0.02% (3/18696)
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
0.09% (16/18696)
Radeon RX
7900 XT
0.005% (1/18696)
Radeon RX
6950 XT
0.005% (1/18696)
GeForce RTX
3080 Ti
0.