Apple M1 Ultra: performance and specs
M1 Ultra — desktop processor produced by Apple for socket Apple M-Socket that has 20 cores and 20 threads. The base clock frequency of the CPU is 2000 MHz, but due to Turbo Boost technology, it can perform up to 3200 MHz. Please note that this chip has integrated graphics Apple M1 Ultra GPU (64-core).
Benchmarks
Performance tests of Apple M1 Ultra in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
1496
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
23702
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
3856
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
40708
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
1764
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
23654
Specifications
M1 Ultra technical specifications
General
| Vendor | Apple |
| Released | March 8, 2022 |
| Type | Desktop |
| instruction set | ARMv8 |
| Model number | APL1106/APL1W06 |
| Socket | Apple M-Socket |
| Integrated GPU | Apple M1 Ultra GPU (64-core) |
Performance
| Cores | 20 |
| Threads | 20 |
| Base Frequency | 2. |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 Cache | 192K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 48MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No |
| Transistors | 114 billions |
| Fabrication process | 5 nm |
| TDP | 60 W |
| Integrated Graphics | Apple M1 Ultra GPU (64-core) |
| GPU Base Clock | 450 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1296 MHz |
| Shading Units | 8192 |
| TMUs | 512 |
| ROPs | 256 |
| TGP | 120 W |
| Max. Resolution | 6016×3384 — 60 Hz |
iGPU FLOPS
20.
8 TFLOPS
Memory support
| Memory types | LPDDR5-6400 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 16 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 800 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No |
ompetitors
1.
Apple M1 Max vs Apple M1 Ultra
2.
Intel Core i9 12900K vs Apple M1 Ultra
3.
Intel Core i7 12700K vs Apple M1 Ultra
4.
Intel Core i7 12700H vs Apple M1 Ultra
5.
Intel Core i9 12900H vs Apple M1 Ultra
6.
Intel Core i7 13700K vs Apple M1 Ultra
7.
Intel Core i9 13900K vs Apple M1 Ultra
8.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X vs Apple M1 Ultra
Do you have any questions about M1 Ultra? Please, use comment form below
Name
Message
How to run Cinebench to test your PC
Skip to main content
The VergeThe Verge logo.
The Verge homepage
The VergeThe Verge logo.
- Tech/
- How to/
- Laptops
/
If you’re interested in benchmarking, Cinebench is a great place to start
By Monica Chin / @mcsquared96
|
Share this story
We here at The Verge use benchmark utilities a lot to compare computers to each other and figure out which ones are the most powerful. But that’s not their only purpose. You may also want to run them just to see how your own PC stacks up to the competition and make sure it’s running as well as it’s supposed to.
One of the easiest utilities for beginners to run is Cinebench R23. This program uses your CPU to render a 3D image and evaluates how well it does that. It’s free and only takes 10 minutes to run.
Here’s how to do it.
Here’s what Cinebench looks like in the app store.
How to Download Cinebench
If you’re using a Mac, search for Cinebench in the App Store. If you’re on Windows, you can find it in the Microsoft Store. Users of either platform can also download it from Maxon’s website directly.
If you’re running Windows 10 or 11, your system needs to have an Intel or AMD 64-bit CPU with SSE3 support and at least 4GB of RAM in order to run Cinebench. If you’re a Mac user, you need to be running macOS 10.13.16 or higher; you also need a 640bit CPU and at least 4GB of RAM.
Note: you may find different versions of Cinebench floating around, but as of this date, Cinebench R23 is the most recent one and the best one to use.
Here’s what it looks like as it runs the test.
How to Run Cinebench
Once you’ve got the program downloaded, open it up. You’ll see two Start buttons in the top left corner. Click the one next to CPU (Multi Core) to test your system’s multi-core capabilities and CPU (Single Core) to test its single-core capabilities.
Both of these tests will take around 10 minutes.
You can also run the tests for as long as 30 minutes if you want to see whether your system can keep up its performance over a longer period of time. To set that up, go to File > Advanced Benchmark. A drop-down menu will pop up on the left side labeled Minimum Test Duration. From that menu, select 30 Minutes. Then start whichever test you want.
For the most accurate score, make sure there are no other programs or background processes running while Cinebench is going and that your device is plugged in. Any settings your computer might have (power profiles, fan settings, etc.) should be maxed out.
Here’s what it looks like when you get your score. I had a bunch of stuff open while my MacBook ran this, so this isn’t the most accurate score.
How to See Your Cinebench Score
Once your device has completed the test (this can take some time, so be patient), a score will pop up next to the start button you pressed earlier.
In the bottom-left corner, Cinebench will show you how your processor stacks up against a list of similar chips.
Remember, Cinebench is just one test and one datapoint. The fact that your computer receives a worse Cinebench score than another doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a worse or weaker computer. All kinds of factors influence the performance that you, the user, might see from a computer, and raw CPU power is just one of them.
Still, Cinebench is one free and easy way to check how your PC is doing and see if there are any performance issues you might need to address.
Most Popular
-
The predatory prison phone call industry is finally about to be fixed
-
Microsoft’s making Excel’s formulas even easier
-
Microsoft Edge is actually good
-
Southwest cancels thousands of flights, leaving passengers stranded across the US
-
The forecast for 2023 is hot
-
How to run PugetBench for After Effects
-
How to run the FPS Benchmark for CS:GO
-
How to run the Red Dead Redemption 2 benchmark
See all 8 stories
Intel Core i7-3770 — Benchmark, test and specifications
Test 3770
Turbo 3.90 GHz. Intel Core i7-3770 contains 4 processor cores. To make the right choice for upgrading your computer, check out the detailed specifications and test results. Please check socket compatibility before choosing. nine0003
| Frequency | 3.40 GHz | Kernels | 4 |
| Turbo (1 core) | 3.90 GHz | CPU Threads | 8 |
| Turbo (all cores) | 3. 90 GHz |
||
| Hyperthreading? | Yes | Overclocking? | Yes |
| Basic architecture | Normal |
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
| GPU frequency | 0.65 GHz |
| GPU (Turbo) | 1.15GHz |
| Generation | |
| DirectX Version | 11.0 |
| Execution units | 16 |
| Shader | 128 |
| Max. memory size | |
| Max. displays | 3 |
| Technology | 22nm |
| Production date | Q1/2011 |
| h364 | Decode / Encode |
| h365 / HEVC (8 bit) | No. |
| h365 / HEVC (10 bit) | No. |
| VP8 | No. |
| VP9 | No. |
| AV1 | No. |
| AV1 | No. |
| AVC | Decode / Encode |
| JPEG | Decode |
| Memory type | |||
| Max. memory size | |||
| Memory channels | 2 | ECC | No. |
| PCIe Version | 3.0 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| TDP (PL1) | 77W | TDP (PL2) | |
| TDP up | — | TDP down | — |
| Tjunction max | — |
| Instruction set (ISA) | X86-64 (64 bit) |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge S |
| L2-Cache | — |
| L3-Cache | 8. 00 MB |
| Technology | 22nm |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Production date | Q2/2012 |
| Socket | LGA 1155 |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes.
The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
IGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second. nine0003
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the program.
The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform test that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform test that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
nine0003
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands. nine0003
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have passed CPU-Benchmark testing. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Benchmark formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Popular comparisons
| 1. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs Intel Core i5-4590 |
2. |
Intel Core i7-4790 vs Intel Core i7-3770 |
| 3. | Intel Core i5-8400 vs Intel Core i7-3770 |
| 4. | Intel Core i7-4770 vs Intel Core i7-3770 |
| 5. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
| 6. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs Intel Core i7-8700 |
| 7. | Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Core i7-3770 |
| 8. | Intel Core i5-4460 vs Intel Core i7-3770 |
| 9. | Intel Core i5-7400 vs Intel Core i7-3770 |
| 10. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs Intel Core i7-6700K |
| 11. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs Intel Core i5-7600 |
| 12. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs Intel Core i3-9100F |
| 13. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
| 14. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs Intel Core i7-7700 |
15. |
Intel Core i5-4570 vs Intel Core i7-3770 |
| 16. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs Intel Core i3-10100 |
| 17. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs Intel Core i5-2500k |
| 18. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs Intel Core i5-3470 |
| 19. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs Intel Core i5-9400F |
| 20. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs Intel Core i5-3570 |
| 21. | Intel Core i5-3570K vs Intel Core i7-3770 |
| 22. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs Intel Core i5-4690 |
| 23. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs Intel Core i5-8600K |
| 24. | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 vs Intel Core i7-3770 |
| 25. | Intel Core i7-3770 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
CPU Benchmark
We group processors by performance, consumption (TDP) and benchmark results.
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading. nine0003
IGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The multi-core test uses all CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
CPU-benchmark. org
03/29/2019 13:20:45
2019-03-29 13:20:45
Sources:
Https://cpu-benchmark. org/ru/cpu/intel-core-i7-3770/
Intel Core i7-3770 Ivy Bridge specifications, price, test, competitors » /> » /> .keyword { color: red; }
Test 3770
nine0003
Quantity of cores — 4, manufactured according to 22 nm process technology, Ivy Bridge architecture.
Thanks to Hyper-Threading technology, the number of threads is 8, which is twice the number of physical cores and increases the performance of multi-threaded applications and games.
Core i7-3770 base frequency — 3.4 GHz. The maximum frequency in Intel Turbo Boost mode reaches 3.9 GHz. Please note that the Intel Core i7-3770 cooler must cool processors with a TDP of at least 77W at stock frequencies. When overclocked, the requirements increase. nine0003
With integrated Intel® HD Graphics 4000, the computer can operate without a discrete graphics card because the monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard.
Price in Russia
Do you want to buy a Core i7-3770 cheaply? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.
Family
Benchmarks Intel Core i7-3770
Speed in games
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests. nine0003
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest. nine0003
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor. nine0003
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking.
Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks
Demanding games and tasks
Extreme load
Different tasks require different strengths of the CPU. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario. nine0003
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
nine0003
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests of users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems. nine0003
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Price in Russia
Do you want to buy a Core i7-3770 cheaply? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.
Speed in games
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
nine0003
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest. nine0003
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
nine0003
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
Benchmarkdb. en
04/01/2018 20:46:37
2018-04-01 20:46:37
Sources:
Https://benchmarkdb. ru/cpu/intel/core_i7-3770/
Intel Core i7-3770 processor — specifications, prices, tests » » /> » /> .keyword { color: red; } nine0003
Test 3770
Attention! The general rating calculation method is selected, which means that the rating percentage is calculated Relative to the most powerful processor participating on our site.
General performance rating
Passmark CPU Mark
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multipotive test
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) single-test test
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multipaque test 9000 Cinebenc bit) Single thread test
Geekbench 4.
0 (64-bit) multiprop-control test
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) single-flow test
x264 HD 4.0 PASS 1
x264 HD 4.0 PASS 2
3D903
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 Attention! The general rating calculation method is selected, which means that the rating percentage is calculated Relative to the most powerful processor participating on our site.
Overall performance rating
329 participate in the rating1 processor
Passmark CPU Mark
The ranking is involved in 3279 processors
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multipoque test
in the ranking 3221 processor
3 (64-bit) single-circuit tesh
in the rating 3215 in the rating of the rating of 3215 in the rating 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
3218 processors
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded
3217 processors
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded
The ranking is involved in 3209 processors
Geekbench 4.
0 (64-bit) Single-Treaty Test
in the ranking 3209 processors
x264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
in the ranking 3211 processors 9,0002 x264 hd 4.0 PASS 2 9083 in the rating 321
3DMark06 CPU
3242 processors participate in the rating
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
171 processors participate in the rating
WinRAR 4.0
3212 processors participate in the rating
| Turbo Boost | 2.0 | Intel Auto Overclocking Technology. |
| EIST (Enhanced Intel SpeedStep) | Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Energy Saving Technology. |
| Thermal Monitoring | Temperature monitoring. |
| Idle States | Idle states. |
| MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | Multimedia extensions. |
| SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | Streaming SIMD processor extension. |
| SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 2. |
| SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 3. |
| SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3) | Additional SIMD extensions for streaming 3. |
| EM64T (Extended Memory 64-bit Technology) | 64-bit extended memory technology. |
| NX (Execute disable bit) | |
| SSE4 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 4. |
| AES (Intel Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions) | Command set extension. |
| AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions) | Command set extension. |
| F16C (16-bit Floating-Point conversion) | 16-bit floating point conversion. |
| TXT (Trusted Execution Technology) | Trusted Execution Technology. |
| Secure Key | Secure key technology. |
| Identity Protection | Personal protection. |
| EDB (Execute Disable Bit) | Execute trip bit. |
| Anti-Theft | Anti-theft. |
| VT-x (Virtualization technology) | Virtualization technology. |
| VT-d (Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O) | Virtualization technology for directed I/O. |
| EPT | Extended page tables. |
| Hyper-Threading | Hyperthreading technology. |
| VPro | Intel Technology Suite, vPro is a marketing term. |
| FDI (Flexible Display Interface) | Flexible display interface. |
Intel Core i7-3770 Processor Overview
The Core i7-3770 desktop microprocessor is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture. Quad-core, high-performance processor for entertainment, work and gaming. Began to enter the stores of components from 29April 2012.
With 22nm process technology, the total number of transistors reaches 1400 million. Boasts an installed HD Graphics 4000 video card. Operating temperature at maximum load is 674°C. Installed on motherboards with LGA1155 connector. The manufacturer claims the bus power is 5 GT/s DMI. This processor will need expensive cooling because the heat dissipation is 77 watts.
The processor has PCI support, making it possible to connect a variety of devices. The installed PCIe 3.0 bus adapter contains 16 lanes. PCI-e version 3.
0 allows the use of SSD (Solid State Drives) NVM Express if there is an appropriate connector in the form factors M.2, PCI cards or U.2. nine0003
The processor works with DDR3-1333,DDR3-1600 memory in 2-channel mode, with a bandwidth of 25.6 Gb/s. The maximum amount of memory that can be installed is 32 GB.
The base clock frequency of 3400 megahertz per core is quite enough for the main tasks assigned to a PC. In addition, the new Boost technology can guarantee the best processor power by significantly raising the clock frequency from 3400 to 3900 MHz.
Powerful enough processor when released in 2012, it can guarantee good PC gaming. nine0003
Competitors and analogues
In 2012, the Core i7-3770 had few competitors of its type, several models deserve attention Core i5-3570S based on the Ivy Bridge microarchitecture, Core i7-3970X based on the Sandy Bridge-E microarchitecture, model 3450 on LGA1155 socket from Core i5 family, 3475S socket LGA1155 model from Core i5 series, 3550S socket LGA1155 from Core i5 series, 6200 model from FX family, 3335S model from Core i5 series, 8350 model from FX series, Core i7-3820 based on the Sandy Bridge-E microarchitecture, Socket AM3+ model 8140 from the FX processor series, model 3770S from the Core i7 processor line, Core i5-2550K based on the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture, Core i5-3470S based on the Ivy Bridge microarchitecture, model 8320 on Socket AM3+ from FX series processors, Model 6130 from FX series, Model 2450P on socket LGA1155 from Core i5 series, FX-6350 based on Vishera microarchitecture, Core i5-3570K based on Ivy Bridge architecture, Model 6300 cp FX family, Model 3770T in the Core i7 processor family, LGA1155 socket model 3570T in the Core i5 family, Model 3330 LGA1155 in the Core i5 processor family, Model 8300 in the FX family, Sandy Bridge core i5-2380P, Model 3550 LGA1155 from Core i5 series, LGA1155 socket model 3470 from Core i5 processor line, Core i5-3350P based on Ivy Bridge microarchitecture, Model 3770K from Core i7 processor series, Model 3450S LGA1155 from Core i5 processor line, Model 3570 from Core i5 family.
Among competing processors from AMD it is worth noting FX-9370 on Vishera architecture, model 8350 Socket AM3+ among FX series processors, FX-8370E on Vishera microarchitecture, FX-8370, which appeared 2 years later, FX-9590 of 2013, and FX-8320 based on Vishera architecture. On the LGA1155 socket, among the competitors, solutions from INTEL can be distinguished: v2 LGA1155 model from the Xeon E3 line, v2 model on the LGA1155 socket from the Xeon E3 line, Core i7-3770K on the Ivy Bridge architecture, v2 model among the Xeon E3 line, Xeon E3-1280 v2 based on the Ivy Bridge-h3 architecture, v2 model from the Xeon E3 processor family. nine0003
If we take into account all the Core models, then the 3770 holds 125th place in the list. The most similar processors under the Intel brand should be called Core i5-3570K, Core i5-3550, Core i5-3335S, Core i7-3770T, Core i5-3475S, Core i5-3570S, Core i5-3340, Core i5-3570T , Core i7-3770K, Core i5-3350P, Core i5-3550S, Core i5-3470. They run on the same LGA1155 socket and the same Ivy Bridge microarchitecture.
Processors that use the same GPU as the Core i7-3770 — Core i7-3940XM 2012, Core i7 3770K LGA1155, Core i7-3840QM 2012, Core i7-3820QM Ivy Bridge, Core i7-3770S 2012, Core i7 3920XM. A productive processor with integrated HD Graphics 4000 video graphics is the Core i7-3770K.
Technologies and Instructions
The Intel Core i7-3770 has many modern technologies and instructions.
There are also integrated virtualization technologies Virtual Machine eXtension, VT-d, EPT. Used standard extension sets NX-Bit, SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3), AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions), EM64T, Multimedia Extensions, SSE, SSE2, AES, F16C (16-bit Floating-Point conversion), SSE3, Streaming SIMD Extensions 4. Among them there are reliable technologies and instructions for protecting Intel® Secure Key, Identity Protection, Execute Disable Bit, Anti-Theft, TXT. It has integrated technologies and power saving instructions, in particular — EIST (Enhanced Intel SpeedStep), Idle States, Thermal Monitoring.
nine0003
Other technologies include Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility, Hyper-Threading, FDI.
Cinebench 11.
Bname. en
11/27/2017 2:46:45
2017-11-27 02:46:45
Sources:
Https://bname. ru/hardware/cpu/intel-core-i7-3770/
CPU Performance Rating — Cinebench R23, specs and scores
Maxon’s Cinebench R23 is a cross-platform benchmark suite for macOS and Windows that uses multi-core and hyper-threading. The benchmark is based on Cinema 4D Suite. Cinebench R23 offers a real measure of system performance for common user tasks. nine0003
Processor
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Score1
74422
Score2
1254
Cores
64
Hertz
2.90 GHz
TDP (PL1)
280 W
Release date
Q1/2020
Processor
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX
Score1
73220
Score2
1231
Cores
64
Hertz
2.
70 GHz
TDP (PL1)
280 W
Release date
Q1/2021
Processor
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280L
Score1
49876
Score2
1037
Cores
28
Hertz
2.70 GHz
TDP (PL1)
205 W
Release date
Q3/2019
Processor
AMD Epyc 7702
Score1
49035
Score2
996
Cores
64
Hertz
2.00 GHz
TDP (PL1)
200W
Release date
Q3/2019
Processor
AMD Epyc 7702
Score1
49035
Score2
996
Cores
64
Hertz
2.
00 GHz
TDP (PL1)
200W
Release date
Q3/2019
Processor
AMD Epyc 7702P
Score1
49035
Score2
996
Cores
64
Hertz
2.00 GHz
TDP (PL1)
200W
Release date
Q3/2019
Processor
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Score1
44502
Score2
1270
Cores
32
Hertz
3.70 GHz
TDP (PL1)
280 W
Release date
Q4/2019
Processor
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Score1
42986
Score2
1244
Cores
32
Hertz
3.
50 GHz
TDP (PL1)
280 W
Release date
Q3/2020
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900KS
Score1
40975
Score2
—
Cores
24 / 32
Hertz
3.20 GHz (6.00 GHz)
TDP (PL1)
150 W
Release date
Q1/2023
Processor
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5965WX
Score1
40535
Score2
1532
Cores
24 / 48
Hertz
3.80 GHz
TDP (PL1)
280 W
Release date
Q1/2022
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900KF
Score1
39556
Score2
—
Cores
24 / 32
Hertz
3.
00 GHz (5.80 GHz)
TDP (PL1)
125 W
Release date
Q4/2022
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900K
Score1
39556
Score2
2267
Cores
24
Hertz
3.80 GHz
TDP (PL1)
125 W
Release date
Q4/2022
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Score1
38657
Score2
1989
Cores
16 / 32
Hertz
4.50 GHz
TDP (PL1)
170 W
Release date
Q4/2022
Processor
AMD Epyc 7502P
Score1
36403
Score2
1021
Cores
32
Hertz
2.
50 GHz
TDP (PL1)
180 W
Release date
Q3/2019
Processor
AMD Epyc 7502P
Score1
36403
Score2
1021
Cores
32
Hertz
2.50 GHz
TDP (PL1)
180 W
Release date
Q3/2019
Processor
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Score1
34255
Score2
1270
Cores
24
Hertz
3.80 GHz
TDP (PL1)
280 W
Release date
Q4/2019
Processor
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Score1
33213
Score2
1103
Cores
32
Hertz
3.
00 GHz
TDP (PL1)
250W
Release date
Q3/2018
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900F
Score1
32605
Score2
—
Cores
24 / 32
Hertz
2.00 GHz (5.60 GHz)
TDP (PL1)
65 W
Release date
Q1/2023
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900
Score1
32605
Score2
—
Cores
24 / 32
Hertz
2.00 GHz (5.60 GHz)
TDP (PL1)
65 W
Release date
Q1/2023
Processor
Intel Xeon W-3175X
Score1
31350
Score2
1112
Cores
28
Hertz
3.
10 GHz
TDP (PL1)
255 W
Release date
Q4/2018
Intel Core i5-9500TE
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H
Intel Core i3-10100F
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
Intel Xeon W-2133
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC 6G
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700XT 8G SE
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1660 Ti COMPACT
EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 XC ULTRA BLACK GAMING
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW2 DT GAMING
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Vulcan U Top-V
EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 SC GAMING ACX 3.