GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q Graphics cards Comparison
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti stacks up against GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Check Price
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
Check Price
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q here:
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q Laptops
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 150% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q — in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is build with Pascal architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q — with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 271 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q — by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | |
Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
Code name | N17P-G1 | N18P-G0 / N18P-G61 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 25 October 2016 | 23 April 2019 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1291 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1392 MHz | 1245 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66. 82 | 72.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 112.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | — |
G-SYNC support | + | |
VR Ready | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1. 2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.140 |
CUDA | + | 7.5 |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.3 kh/s | |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 326 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Decred / DCR (Decred) | 1.01 Gh/s | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 12.62 Mh/s | |
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) | 156.48 Sol/s | |
Check Price |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro T1000
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Quadro T1000
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon R9 280X
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs FirePro W7100
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Radeon R9 280X
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs FirePro W7100
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
-
GeForce GTX 1650
137%
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 |
37% higher gaming performance. |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (22 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
GPU Name | TU107 () | vs | GP107 (GP107-400-A1) | |
Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 14 nm | |
Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 132 mm² | |
Transistors | unknown | vs | 3,300 million | |
Shaders | 896 | vs | 768 | |
Compute Units | 14 | vs | 6 | |
Core clock | 1485 MHz | vs | 1290 MHz | |
ROPs | 32 | vs | 32 | |
TMUs | 56 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 | |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit | |
Memory Speed | 2000 MHz 8000 MHz effective |
vs | 1752 MHz 7008 MHz effective |
|
Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
TDP | 0 watts | vs | 75 watts | |
Release Date | 30 Apr 2019 | vs | 25 Oct 2016 |
-
GeForce GTX 1650
53. 28 GP/s
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
41.30 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 1650
93.24 GT/s
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
61.90 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 1650
128.00 GB/s
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
112.10 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 1650
2984.00 GFLOPs
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
1981.40 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
52
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
34
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
53
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
38
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
62
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
49
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
48
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
38
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 11,Windows 10×64 build 1809
-
GeForce GTX 1650
56
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
44
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce GTX 1650
77
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
65
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra detail, 16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
23
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
20
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
56
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
33
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
42
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
30
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
54
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
42
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
GeForce GTX 1650
51
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
38
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
32
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
14
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
39
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
28
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
42
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
35
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
31
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
24
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 11,Windows 10×64 build 1809
-
GeForce GTX 1650
40
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
30
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce GTX 1650
49
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
43
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra detail, 16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
17
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
15
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
38
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
22
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
27
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
19
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1650
37
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
30
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
GeForce GTX 1650
35
-
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
29
FPS (higher is better)
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 570 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce GTX 1050 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
VS | ||
Radeon RX 580 2048SP | Radeon RX 580X |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 550. Comparative specifications and benchmarks of video cards
VS
General information
The general information section in the comparison list contains information about the release date, type, overall rating and other useful data to determine the winner between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 550. Please note that the comparison is based on all indicators, and below are ratings from synthetic benchmarks that define different criteria in games and work applications. nine0003
215
Position in the performance rating
398
42.81 9000
Desktop
25 October 2016 (5 years ago)
Release date0003
$ 79
$ 350 (2.5x MSRP)
Actual price
$ 851 (10.8x MSRP)
20.60
PRICE
2.89
N17P-G1
COD Name of GPU
LX Desktop
Market Segment
Desktop
Specifications
Which graphics card is better in comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 550 in manufacturing process, power consumption, and GPU base and turbo frequency is the most important part contained in the rating of video cards. nine0003
37.86
2.138 GFLOPS
Swimming of
1.211 GFLOPS
97 ° C
Maximum temperature
No data
768
CUDA
NE
512
1392 MHz
Acceleration speed
1183 MHz
3.300 million
Number of transistors
2.200 9 million0002 75 Watt
TDP
50 Watt
Dimensions, connectors and compatibility connectors and plug-in interfaces
PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
145 mm
Length
145 mm
None
0002 None
Memory (frequency and overclocking)
Graphics card memory plays an important role in both gaming and graphics applications. The higher the standard ( GDDR ), the better. It directly affects the speed and efficiency of data processing. What is the difference in type, base and turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 550:
GDDR5
0003
4 GB
128 BIT
DISTRUCTION OF Memory Tire
128 BIT
7 GB/S
Memory frequency
7000 MHZ
112 GB/S
memory capacity
. 0 GB/S
—
Shared memory
N/A
Port and display support
Let’s find out the difference in ports that NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 550 graphics cards are equipped with. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors. nine0003
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Connection
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
+
Support G-Sync
9000 +
9000 HDMI
9000 + 9000
Let’s see what the difference is. It is worth noting that NVIDIA and AMD use different technologies.
+
VR support
n/a
+
Multiple monitors
n/a
+
3D Vision
No data
+
CUDA
No data
+
Multi-Projection
No data
ANSEL
NO DACK
Support APIs 9000 9000 9000 two rivals NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 550 are almost over. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
nine0003
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
Opengl
4.6
1.2.131
Vulkan
No data
6.4
Shader Model
1.2 1.
OpenCL
n/a
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti versus AMD Radeon RX 550 benchmark comparison
Popular comparisons with selected graphics cards
1. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
2. nine0333 | AMD Radeon RX 550 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
3. |
nine0333 | AMD Radeon RX 590 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
four. |
AMD Radeon RX 550 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 nine0333 | |
five. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
6. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
7. nine0333 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
8. |
nine0333 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 |
nine. |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 560 nine0333 | |
10. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
eleven. | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs. AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
12. nine0333 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
13. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
fourteen. |
nine0333 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
15. |
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC vs Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC
- Main
- Video card comparison
 / 
 / 
Overall rating
Issued
Q2/2018
Issued
Q2/2019
Overall rating
What is better to choose MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC or Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC? nine0003
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their characteristics and benchmark results.
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC has a maximum frequency of 1.442 GHz+ 4%. Memory size 3 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released Q2/2018.
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC has a maximum frequency of 1.485 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released Q2/2019.
Differences
Characteristics
Benchmarks (tests)
Reviews
Differences
Reasons to choose
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC
Report a bug
Positions in benchmark results
General positions of MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC video cards in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
-
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
2923 place
-
Battlefield 5
2911 place
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2783 place
Reasons to choose
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC
Report a bug
Positions in benchmark results
General positions of Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC video cards in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
-
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
2807 place
-
Battlefield 5
2827 place
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2718 place
-
Crypto Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
2848 place
-
Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
2575 place
Characteristics
Technical data
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GTOC
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC
Basic information
Comparison of the main technical characteristics of MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC and Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC video cards, chip, information processing modules.
-
Based on
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR5)
-
GPU chip
GP107-301-A1 TU117-300-A1
-
Processing units
6 14
-
Shaders
768 896
-
Output units (ROP)
24 32
-
Texturing Unit (TMU)
48 56
Memory characteristics
Comparison of the amount of memory on board video cards. The bigger, the better.
Clock speed
Let’s compare the memory frequency of MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC and Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC. The higher the better. nine0003
-
Base frequency
1.442 GHz+ 4% 1.485 GHz
-
Maximum frequency
1.582 GHz+ 4% 1.725 GHz+ 4%
-
Avg (Game) Clock
1.665 GHz
-
Acceleration
Yes Yes
Power consumption
Connectors, the number of thermal watts generated in normal mode and during overclocking. nine0003
-
TDP
75W 75W
-
TDP (up)
— —
-
Tjunction max
— —
-
PCIe-Power
1 x 6-Pin
Cooler type, specifications
Types and sizes of coolers for MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC and Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC video cards. nine0003
Interfaces
Connections and connectors.
Technical data
Technical data that is used to the full in computer games.
Supported video codecs
Native support for video and image compression standards.
Dimensions
Difference in dimensions, weight and slots of compared devices
Additional data
Comparison of interfaces and release date of GPU Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC and MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC. nine0003
-
GPU interface
PCIe 3.0 x 16 PCIe 3.0 x 16
-
Issue
Q2/2018 Q2/2019
-
Release price
— —
-
Technological process
14 nm 12 nm
-
Number
— NE51650S1BG1-1170F
-
specification
data sheet data sheet
Benchmarks
GPUs Performance Tests
Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between MSI GeForce GTX 1050 3GT OC and Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC.