Nvidia Rtx 2080 Super Oem
Ordenar por
-
Nvidia Geforce Rtx 2080
en
12x
1075 pesos$1,075
sin interés
Envío gratis
-
Laptop gamer Lenovo Legion 15IMH05 slate gray y black 15.6″, Intel Core i7 10750H 32GB de RAM 1 TB SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 240 Hz 1920x1080px Windows 10 Home
Vendido por Mercado Libre Electronica
Antes: 79999 pesos$79,99974999 pesos$74,9996% OFF
en
12x
6249 pesos$6,249
sin interés
Envío gratis
-
Laptop Lenovo Legion 7 Intel I7 32gb Ram 1tb Ssd Rtx 2080 8b
Vendido por Mercado Libre Electronica
en
12x
6249 pesos$6,249
sin interés
Envío gratis
-
Laptop Lenovo Legion 7 Intel I7 32gb Ram 1tb Ssd Rtx 2080 8b
en
12x
5833 pesos$5,833
sin interés
Envío gratis
Reacondicionado
-
Laptop Gamer Lenovo Legion 15imh05 Core I7 10750h, Rtx 2080
en
12x
5833 pesos$5,833
sin interés
Envío gratis
Reacondicionado
-
Tarjeta Video Rtx 2080 Super Gigabyte Windforce Oc Seminueva
en
12x
699 pesos con 92 centavos $699.
92
sin interés
Usado
-
Rtx 2080 Súper 8gb
en
18x
562 pesos con 88 centavos $562.88
Envío gratis
Usado
-
Tarjeta Video Rtx 2080 Super Gigabyte Windforce Oc Seminueva
en
12x
812 pesos con 10 centavos $812.10
Usado
-
Alienware R11 Rtx 2080 Super
en
12x
2324 pesos$2,324
sin interés
Envío gratis
Usado
-
Rtx 2080 Oem
en
12x
913 pesos con 72 centavos $913.72
Envío gratis
Usado
-
Tarjeta De Video Alienware Oem Rtx3090
en
12x
1335 pesos$1,335
sin interés
Usado
-
Nvidia Geforce Rtx 2080 Super / Black Gaming / 8gb Gddr6
en
12x
583 pesos con 25 centavos $583.
25sin interés
Envío gratis
Usado
-
Lenovo Legion 7i 32gb Ram, 1tb Ssd, 8gb Nvidea Rtx 2080
en
12x
2487 pesos$2,487
sin interés
Envío gratis
Usado
-
Alienware Aurora R11 Con Nvidia Rtx 2080 Super, 32 Gb Ram
en
12x
4000 pesos$4,000
sin interés
Envío gratis
Usado
-
Asus Rtx 2080 Super Evo (openbox)
en
12x
1319 pesos$1,319
Usado
-
Rtx 2080 Super Water Cooled Enfriamiento Líquido
en
12x
1125 pesos$1,125
sin interés
Envío gratis
Usado
-
Rtx 2080 Super Rog Strix Impecable
en
18x
569 pesos con 55 centavos $569.
55Envío gratis
Usado
-
Tarjeta De Video Gigabyte Rtx 2080 Super Gamming Oc
en
18x
746 pesos con 75 centavos $746.75
Envío gratis
Usado
-
Rtx 2080 Super
en
18x
600 pesos con 40 centavos $600.40
Usado
El envío gratis está sujeto al peso, precio y la distancia del envío.
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs Radeon HD 8990 OEM
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
| 125 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 8990 OEM . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8990 OEM |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | Radeon HD 8990 OEM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU Name | TU102 () | vs | Malta () | |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 28 nm | |
| Die Size | 754 mm² | vs | 365 mm² | |
| Transistors | 18,600 million | vs | 4,313 million | |
| Shaders | 4352 | vs | 2048 | |
| Compute Units | 68 | vs | 32 | |
| Core clock | 1350 MHz | vs | 950 MHz | |
| ROPs | 88 | vs | 32 | |
| TMUs | 272 | vs | 128 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | Radeon HD 8990 OEM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5 | |
| Bus Width | 352 bit | vs | 384 bit x2 | |
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz 14000 MHz effective |
vs | 1500 MHz
6000 MHz effective |
|
| Memory Size | 11264 Mb | vs | 3072 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | Radeon HD 8990 OEM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250 watts | vs | 375 watts | |
| Release Date | 20 Aug 2018 | vs | 24 Apr 2013 |
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
132.
00 GP/s -
Radeon HD 8990 OEM
60.80 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
408.00 GT/s
-
Radeon HD 8990 OEM
244.00 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
616.00 GB/s
-
Radeon HD 8990 OEM
576.00 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
13056.00 GFLOPs
-
Radeon HD 8990 OEM
7782.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
| VS | ||
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
| VS | ||
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
| VS | ||
| Radeon HD 8990 OEM | GeForce GTX 1650 |
| VS | ||
| Radeon HD 8990 OEM | Radeon RX 570 |
| VS | ||
| Radeon RX 6800 | TITAN RTX |
| VS | ||
| TITAN RTX | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super.
VS
General Info
The General Information section of the Video Card Comparison List provides release date, type, overall rating, and other useful data to determine the winner between NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super . Please note that the comparison takes place on all indicators, and below are the ratings from synthetic benchmarks that define different criteria in games and work applications.
1671
Position in the performance rating
17
0.33
Price and quality ratio
30.38
Fermi 2.0
TURING
GF1119 9000 9000 9000 Tu104 9000.
Desktop
20 August 2012
Release date
2 July 2019 (2 years ago)
No data0003
$ 699
$ 82
Actual price
$ 1370 (2x MSRP)
No data
Cost ratio
20.95
No data 9000
Desktop
Specifications
Which graphics card is better in NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super comparison in manufacturing process, power consumption, and GPU base and turbo frequency is the most important part contained in video card rating.
96
Conveyors
3072
589 MHZ
Nucleus Frequency
1650 MHZ
Acceleration
1815 MHZ 9000 292 Million
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 Milion nm
Process
12 nm
29 Watt
Power Consumption (TDP)
250 Watt
9.424
Number of texels processed per 1 second
348.5
269.2 GFLOPS
Operations with a swimming of
No data
No data
conveyors / CUDA nuclei
3072
No data.
Upersed
1815 MHZ 9000,0002 NOT DATA RISTORS NOT DEMENS
13,600 million
N/A
TDP
250 Watt
Dimensions, connectors and compatibility Super. As well as the main types of connectors and connected interfaces
PCIE 2.0 X16
Interface
PCIE 3.0 X16
145 MM
length
267 MM
None
Additional power
1x 8-PIN
Memory (frequency and vime)
Graphics card memory plays an important role in both gaming and graphics applications.
The higher the standard ( GDDR ), the better. It directly affects the speed and efficiency of data processing. What is the difference in type, base and turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super:
DDR3
Memorial type
GDDR6
1 GB
Maximum RAM AMOUNT
8 GB
64 BIT
Memory Bit 9000 256 BIT
100022 8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
495.9 GB/s
N/A
Shared memory
—
Port and display support GeForce RTX 2080 Super. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors.
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Display
1x HDMI, 3X DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
No data
Support G-Sync
+
No data
HDMI
+
Technology
Let’s see what the difference is. It is worth noting that NVIDIA and AMD use different technologies.
n.
a.
VR support
+
n.a.
Multiple monitors
+
N/A
CUDA
7.5
API support
The confrontation between the two rivals NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super is almost over. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
No data
Vulkan
1.2.131
No data
SHADER MODEL
6.5
No data
Opencl
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTRSUSUSUSUSUSUSUSUSUSUSUSUSUSU in benchmark tests
Popular comparisons with selected graphics cards
| 1. |
Intel HD Graphics 620 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM
|
|
| 2. | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs. AMD Radeon VII | |
| 3. | NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
| 4. |
NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
|
|
| 5. | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
| 6. | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs. NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
| 7. |
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
|
|
| 8. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM | |
| 9. | NVIDIA QuadroFX 3800M vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
| 10. |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM
|
|
| eleven. | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | |
| 12. | AMD Radeon R9 270X vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
| 13. |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs. AMD Radeon 550X
|
|
| 14. | AMD Caicos vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
| 15. | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs. AMD Radeon R7 M445 |
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G2D Mark, PassMark — G3D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) ), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
versus
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Benefits
Why choose NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- % more: 1755 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process for the video card makes it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- About 65% less power consumption: 130 Watt vs 215 Watt
- About 2% more PassMark — G2D Mark performance: 936 vs 917
| Release date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 20 September 2018 |
| Boost core clock | 1755 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
| Technological process | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 215 Watt |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 936 vs 917 |
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- 28% more shader processors: 2944 vs 2304
- 8 times more memory frequency: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- PassMark — G3D Mark performance about 57% faster: 18782 vs 11965
- Geekbench — OpenCLbench performance about 48% more: 105930 vs 71667
- About 77% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score: 10988 vs 6201
- About 57% more performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) : 326.494 vs 207.559 - CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 56% faster: 3938.377 vs 2525.393
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 68% faster more: 31.684 vs 18.897
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark about 89% more: 159.275 vs 84.388
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) benchmark about 89% more: 1506.874 vs 795.851
| Number of shader processors | 2944 vs 2304 |
| Memory frequency | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 18782 vs 11965 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 105930 vs 71667 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 10988 vs 6201 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
326.494 vs 207.559 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 vs 2525.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 vs 18.897 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 vs 84.388 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 vs 795.851 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|||||
| Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
897 
874 | Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 936 | 917 |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 11965 | 18782 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 71667 | 105930 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 6201 | 10988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207. 559 |
326.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2525.393 | 3938.377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.897 | 31.684 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.388 | 159.275 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 795.851 | 1506.874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
6966 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 |
Performance comparison
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Codename | GA106 | TU104 |
| Production date | 4 Jan 2022 | 20 September 2018 |
| Place in ranking | 116 | 60 |
| Price at first issue date | $699 | |
| Price now | $749. 99 |
|
| Type | Desktop | |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 32.34 | |
| Boost core clock | 1755 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Core frequency | 1515 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Process | 8nm | 12nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8. 087 TFLOPS (1:1) |
|
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087TFLOPS | |
| Number of shaders | 2304 | 2944 |
| Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | |
| Texturing Speed | 126.4 GTexel/s | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Number of transistors | 12000 million | 13,600 million |
| Video connectors | 1x HDMI 2. 1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| Form factor | Dual slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 267mm |
| Recommended power supply | 300 Watt | |
| Additional power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.
|