Nvidia GTX 1660 vs 980
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 391,501 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
170,996 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 67% MSI(1462 3170)
Worst Bench: 55% EVGA(3842 2982) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 55%
Great: 67%
SPEED RANK: 88th / 688
220,505 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Asus(1043 86BB)
Worst Bench: 63% MSI(1462 3793) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 63%
Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 82nd / 688
Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed |
60. 6 % | 68.7 % | Faster effective speed. +13% |
Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
75.2 fps | 91.6 fps | Better lighting effects. +22% |
|||
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
87.2 fps | 92 fps | Slightly better reflection handling. +6% |
|||
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
77.6 fps | Faster multi rendering. +18% |
66 fps | |||
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
74. 4 fps | 79.6 fps | Slightly faster NBody calculation. +7% |
Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
84.1 fps | 98.3 fps | Better peak lighting effects. +17% |
|||
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
96.9 fps | 124 fps | Better peak reflection handling. +28% |
|||
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
81.8 fps | Faster peak multi rendering. +14% |
71.7 fps | |||
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
81. 7 fps | 84.3 fps | +3% |
CSGO Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
183 Fps | Much Better CSGO Fps. +43% |
128 Fps | |||
Fortnite Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
105 Fps | 120 Fps | Better Fortnite Fps. +14% |
|||
PUBG Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
70 Fps | 81 Fps | Better PUBG Fps. +15% |
|||
GTAV Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
61 Fps | 76 Fps | Better GTAV Fps. +25% |
|||
LoL Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
191 Fps | +4% | 183 Fps | |||
Overwatch Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
104 Fps | +2% | 102 Fps | |||
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
60 Fps | 63 Fps | +5% | |||
Minecraft Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
207 Fps | 306 Fps | Much Better Minecraft Fps. +48% |
|||
DOTA 2 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
136 Fps | +4% | 131 Fps | |||
WoT Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
111 Fps | 117 Fps | Slightly Better WoT Fps. +5% |
Market Share
Based on 56,035,122 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.28 % | 0.66 % | Hugely higher market share. +136% |
|||
Value Value For Money |
28.7 % | 91.2 % | Hugely better value. +217% |
|||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
66 % | 76 % | More popular. +15% |
|||
Price Price (score) |
$500 | $179 | Much cheaper. +64% |
Age Newest |
98 Months | 43 Months | Much more recent. +56% |
|||
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
85.4 fps | 85.8 fps | +0% | |||
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
72.9 fps | 76 fps | +4% | |||
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
76.1 fps | 77.3 fps | +2% | |||
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
66. 6 fps | 69.8 fps | +5% |
ADVERTISEMENT
The Nvidia GTX 980 is the new top end Maxwell based Nvidia GPU. The Maxwell architecture offers significantly higher clock for clock performance when compared to Kepler based cards from the previous generation. Comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 970 shows that the 970 only lags by around 17% in terms of performance but it’s priced nearly 40% lower making the GTX 970 far better value for money card. Even though the GTX 970 beats the 980 in terms of value, the 980 still destroys previous generation cards. Comparing the GTX 980 and 780 Ti shows that the Newer 980 offers around 14% better performance at a 25% price discount. Nvidia have changed the price/performance landscape with their new Maxwell architecture and now pose a serious threat to AMDs high end GPU market share. The new GTX 980/970 cards replace the now discontinued GTX 780 Ti, 780 and 770. [Sep ’14 GPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
NVIDIA’s GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month’s release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs’s new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD’s $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar ’19 GPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
Systems with these GPUs
Top Builds that include these GPUs
- MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917) (620)
- Asus Z170 PRO GAMING (586)
- Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO (552)
- Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (398)
- Alienware Area-51 R2 (372)
- Asus Z97-A (332)
- Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO (321)
- Cyberpowerpc C SERIES (568)
- Gigabyte B450M DS3H (390)
- MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) (348)
- Asrock B365M IB-R (329)
- Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (262)
- Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (244)
- MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (244)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 GPU Rankings.
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
-
Nvidia RTX 3070
-
Nvidia RTX 3050
-
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 3080
-
Nvidia RTX 4090
-
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
-
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
-
Nvidia RTX 2060
-
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
-
AMD RX 6600-XT
-
AMD RX 5600-XT
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
GeForce GTX 1660 vs GeForce GTX 980 Graphics cards Comparison
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce GTX 980. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce GTX 980. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1660
Check Price
GeForce GTX 980
Check Price
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce GTX 980 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 165 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pins |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Check Price |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 980 has 37% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1660.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1660 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 980.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1660 is build with Turing architecture, and GeForce GTX 980 — with Maxwell.
- GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 980 — by 28 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 1660 is 219 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 980.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1660 is 7993 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 980.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 980. | ||
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 in Battlefield 5 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 980. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 980. | ||
high / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
medium / 1080p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 in Fortnite is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 980. | ||
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 in Grand Theft Auto V is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 980. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 in Metro Exodus is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 980. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 0% more, than GeForce GTX 980. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce GTX 980 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce GTX 980 | |
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
Code name | Turing TU116 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 14 March 2019 | 19 September 2014 |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 1216 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,600 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 157. 1 | 144 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 4,981 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | 10.5″ (26.7 cm) |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 192.1 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | — |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1. 2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 7.5 | + |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.54 kh/s | |
CUDA cores | 2048 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | 4 displays | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 579 Mh/s | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.
|