GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs Radeon RX 5700 XT
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
| 50 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon RX 5700 XT . |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 5700 XT |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
No clear winner declared
These graphics cards seems to have comparable performance based on the game benchmark suite used (72 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | Radeon RX 5700 XT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU Name | TU104 (TU104-410-A1) | vs | Navi 10 (Navi 10 XT) | |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 7 nm | |
| Die Size | 545 mm² | vs | 254 mm² | |
| Transistors | 13,600 million | vs | unknown | |
| Shaders | 2560 | vs | 2560 | |
| Compute Units | 40 | vs | 40 | |
| Core clock | 1605 MHz | vs | 1605 MHz | |
| ROPs | 64 | vs | 64 | |
| TMUs | 160 | vs | 256 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | Radeon RX 5700 XT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR6 | |
| Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 256 bit | |
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz 14000 MHz effective |
vs | 1750 MHz 14000 MHz effective |
|
| Memory Size | 8192 Mb | vs | 8192 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | Radeon RX 5700 XT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175 watts | vs | 225 watts | |
| Release Date | 9 Jul 2019 | vs | 7 Jul 2019 |
GigaPixels — higher is better
GigaTexels — higher is better
GB/s — higher is better
GFLOPs — higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
FPS (higher is better)
| VS | ||
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary |
| VS | ||
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | GeForce RTX 2080 |
| VS | ||
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary |
| VS | ||
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | GeForce RTX 2080 |
| VS | ||
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
| VS | ||
| GeForce RTX 2080 Super | TITAN V |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Compare PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 5700 XT vs MSI RTX 2070 Super GAMING X
-
Compare -
Graphics Cards - PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 5700 XT ? MSI RTX 2070 Super GAMING X
Save comparison
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
* Pangoly may earn a commission when you use one of the links to make a purchase.
|
|||||||||||||
|
Brand
|
Brand
|
||||||||||||
|
Model
|
Model
|
||||||||||||
|
Release Date
|
Release Date
|
||||||||||||
|
* First availability for purchase, it may not correspond to the actual market launch date. 
|
|||||||||||||
|
User reviews
|
User reviews
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| $ 400 (80%) |
$ 500 | $ 350 (70%) |
$ 400 (80%) |
|||||
| The initial price in the Russian Federation (with VAT) | ₽29 ₽29 ₽29 ₽29 ) | ₽40 thousand | ₽25.5 thousand (64%) |
₽33 thousand (83%) | |||||||||
| CHIP CHEP | TSMC 7 ours | tsmc 12 nm | tsmcu | nm | nm | nm | nm | nm | nm | nm | nm. | TSMC 12nm | |
| GPU area | 54 DBA | 45.0 DBA (83%) |
50.5 dBA (94%) |
41 dBA (77%) |
|||||||||
| Production in transactions with the floating point | 9.1 (93%) |
7.95 (82%) |
7. 2 (74%) |
||||||||||
| Pixel speed (on turbo age, gig-pixel/c) | 121.9 | 113.3 9004 | RTX 2060 Super | ||||||||||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 39.8 (93%) |
42.6 | 36.0 (85%) |
36.8 (86%) |
|||||||||
| F1 2019 | 54.8 (91%) |
59.9 | 47.1 (79%) |
50.1 (84%) |
|||||||||
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 38.3 (83%) |
46.2 | 35.5 (77%) |
40.7 (88%) |
|||||||||
| Metro exodus | 34.8 (99%) |
35.0 | 31.7 (91%) |
29 (85) | |||||||||
| Strange Brigade | 69.6 (93%) |
75.0 | 64.2 (86%) |
64.0 (85%) |
|||||||||
| Total War: Three Kingdoms | 26. 2 (87%) |
30.0 | 23.5 (78%) |
25. | |||||||||
| Grand Theft Auto V | 41.0 (86%) |
47.5 | 37.1 (78%) |
42.6 (90%) |
|||||||||
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60.1 | 58.0 (97%) |
53.4 (89%) |
49.3 (82%) |
|||||||||
00
(Disclosure)
5
In any case, at a resolution of 2K (1440p) about the same balance of power is obtained. All four graphics cards were paired with an Intel Core i9 processor0019 The 5700 XT turned out to be slightly more productive on average. At the same time, it has noticeably higher power consumption with heating, and besides, the Radeon RX 5700 XT is much noisier.
AMD’s junior graphics card, the Radeon RX 5700, is certainly slower, but can also be regarded as an alternative to the RTX 2060 Super — on average, they have about the same performance.
Almost the same can be said about the Radeon RX 5700 XT vs RTX 2070 Super pair — out of 9 games, the lag in 4 games is negligible, and in 1 game, the AMD video card is even slightly faster.
And this despite the fact that the difference in price is $100 in the US (without VAT) and ₽11.5 thousand (with VAT).
In a word, video cards from the Radeon RX 5700 series can be considered quite a worthy alternative to the two younger models of Nvidia’s Super-series. It should be remembered that the latter involve an older process technology. With comparable performance, the GPU die size of the RTX 2070 Super and RTX 2060 Super is 117% and 77% larger than the Radeon RX 5700/XT. Even so, Nvidia graphics cards run cooler and make less noise. Obviously, with the transition to TSMC 7 nm, Nvidia will inevitably take the lead.
AMD, Nvidia, Desktop processors and graphics cards
Radeon RX 5700, Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile
Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile — Th200
Contents
- Introduction
- Features
- Tests
- Key differences
- Conclusion
- Comments
Video card
Video card
Introduction
We compared two graphics cards: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile.
On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT is a Radeon Pro Mac generation (Navi Series) integrated graphics card based on RDNA 1.0 architecture released Aug 4th, 2020.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile is a GeForce 20 Mobile generation integrated graphics card based on Turing architecture released on Apr 2nd, 2020. GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile
Release Date
Aug 4th, 2020
Apr 2nd, 2020
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 3.0
14.13 TFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance
7.675 TFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance
479.7 GFLOPS (1:16)
220.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
Clock Speeds
Basic frequency
1243 MHZ
1140 MHZ
Maximum frequency
1499 MHZ
1380 MHz
MEMITS Frequencies of 9000 MHz 9000 9000 9000 MHz
0436
Shading Units
2560
2560
Texture Units
160
160
Raster Units
64
64
SM Count
40
Tensor Cores
320
Compute Units
40
RT Cores
40
Graphics Features
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Opengl
4.
6 9000 9000 4.6 4.6 9,000 9,000 9000
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile
Th200 RP
Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
+3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile
Key Differences
Why is AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile?
Newer — 4 months late release
Has 3% better performance
More modern manufacturing process — 7 nm vs 12 nm
Has 8 GB more memory
Has 9% faster pixel fill rate — 95.94 GPixel/s vs 88.32 GPixel/s
Has 9% faster texture fill rate — 239.8 GTexel/s vs 220.8 GTexel/s
Why is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile better than AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT?
Consumes 12% less power — 115W vs 130W
Has 17% more bandwidth — 448.
0 GB/s vs 384.0 GB/s
Conclusion
Which is better Radeon Pro 5700 XT or GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile?
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT delivers 3% better performance, consumes up to 14% more energy and holds 8 GB more memory. Based on our research, Radeon Pro 5700 XT 3990X is more powerful than GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile.
What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to Radeon Pro 5700 XT?
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is AMD’s closest competitor to the Radeon Pro 5700 XT. It is 2% more powerful, uses 62% more energy, and holds 8 GB more memory.
What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to Radeon Pro 5700 XT?
The Quadro RTX 4000 is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the Radeon Pro 5700 XT. It is 1% more powerful, uses 24% more energy, and holds 8 GB more memory.
How does Radeon Pro 5700 XT perform compared to GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile and other graphics cards?
Relative performance
General performance
Mobile performance
Professional performance
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT / Page 7
Rating & Review
Review Page:
Gaming Test (Part 3)5- Performance & Consumption6- Temperatures & Noise, Overclocking & Power Limits7- Rating & Review
According to AMD, the Radeon RX 5700 XT will pull in about $399.
- Significant performance improvement, surpasses RTX 2070 and nearly as fast as Radeon VII
- Decent price
- Good energy efficiency
- Backplate
- Microsoft Xbox Game Pass for PC included
- PCI Express 4.0
- 7nm manufacturing process
- DSC 1.2a support delivers 8K 60Hz
- FidelityFX and Radeon Anti-Lag
- Very noisy when gaming
- Difficult acceleration
- Bugs in drivers
- High temperatures
- No ray tracing
- Without fan stop idle
- High consumption in multi-monitor mode
- CrossFire is no longer supported
Finally, we publish the second review of the AMD card on «Navi» — the architecture that everyone has heard so much about in previous years. This review focuses on the flagship Radeon RX 5700 XT, and has covered the Radeon RX 5700 in detail in the past. Both cards are based on the new «Navi 10» die, representing AMD’s RDNA graphics architecture, replacing the legacy GCN.
Also new is the use of GDDR6 graphics memory, which is easier to use and more cost effective than the HBM2 featured in recent Vega cards.
In terms of aesthetics and materials, the Radeon RX 5700 XT is a beautiful card that continues the AMD theme established by the company for their reference designs. I liked the cooler’s new metal shroud with its milled strips that immediately convey the feeling of a «high-quality product» thanks to the coolness of the metal and the feel of the surface texture. The included metal back panel is well done too.
Averaging the test set, it is clear that the Radeon RX 5700 XT is 2% ahead of Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 2070. This makes the card a whopping 20% faster than the Vega 64 and only 8% slower than the Radeon VII, which is really impressive. Nvidia preempted AMD Navi with the RTX 2060 Super, which is almost as fast as the RTX 2070 — the 5700 XT is 5% faster. Also new is the RTX 2070 Super, a card that is actually based on the RTX 2080 GPU — this card is 12% faster than the RX 5700 XT.
The RTX 2080 Ti is still king of the hill, delivering 50% more FPS than the RX 5700 XT, albeit at more than double the price. With these performance results, we can definitely recommend the RX 5700 XT for the ultimate gaming detail at 1440p or high refresh rates at 1080p.
Testing has shown that the RX 5700 XT is much more power efficient than anything we’ve ever seen from AMD, improving efficiency by 30%-40% over the Vega GPU generation. With 220W for gaming, the card uses slightly less power than the RX Vega 56 while delivering 30% better performance. The power consumption test results show that the RX 5700 XT did catch up with Nvidia’s Pascal architecture in this area. Turing-based graphics cards are still about 20% more efficient than the RX 5700 XT. For the Radeon RX 5700 (non-XT), AMD has implemented undervoltage with impressive results, reaching parity with even Turing (see RX 5700 review).
Unfortunately, the noise levels of the RX 5700 XT reference design are clearly high.
In fact, they are identical to the RX Vega and Radeon VII: 43 dB(A). Part of the problem is that AMD, unlike Nvidia, sticks to this type of cooler type that just doesn’t do the job. Nvidia got the hang of it and redesigned coolers with the launch of the RTX Founders Edition, and it’s helping them a lot. For example, the RTX 2070 Super, for example, draws the same amount of power but is much quieter at only 33 dB(A), which is significantly cooler at the same time at 76°C. The temperature of our RX 5700 XT was quite high, reaching 92°C during gaming; the Hot Spot temperature sensor even rose to 110 °C. AMD has gone to great lengths to fine-tune the idle speed of the fan, the noise of which will blend in with other active cooling components in the system.
While overclocking is possible, it’s somewhat tricky and requires turning off most of the clock speed and power management of the card to get a few percent performance — 5.6% in today’s case. Memory overclocking was particularly disappointing.
Both competing companies use the same GDDR6 memory chips from Samsung. On Nvidia, you can easily reach over 2000 MHz in memory; on the RX 5700 XT, 1840 MHz turned out to be the edge, which was more constrained by driver errors (Adrenalin 19.7.1)/BIOS than memory chips.
Originally advertised at $449, AMD dropped the price of the RX 5700 XT to $399 just before launch, which helped the company a lot, especially compared to Nvidia’s recent launch of the RTX Super series. At this price point, the RX 5700 XT is $100 cheaper than the RTX 2070 Super, offering a 10% better price/performance ratio. Compared to the RTX 2070, which is currently $480, the RX 5700 XT even has a 20% advantage in this metric. The RTX 2060 and RTX 2060 Super breathe down AMD’s neck, although price/performance is essentially identical to the RX 5700 XT, they have much better power/heat/noise, fewer bugs, and hardware-accelerated ray tracing. There’s no doubt that AMD will fix these gaps in the near future, but for some it’s the noise that counts, you’ll have to wait for AMD partners to release their own variants with better coolers in the coming months.