AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G on one side and the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,9GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,3 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen | Zen+ | ||||||
| Core name | Raven Ridge | Pinnacle Ridge | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 5 2000 | Ryzen 7 2000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
YD2400C5M4MFB, |
YD270XBGM88AF |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2018 | Q2 2018 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 4. 950.000.000 |
4.800.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 16 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,6 GHz | 3,7 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,9 GHz | 4,3 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 16 MB | 16 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-2933 |
DDR4-2933 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 43,71 GB/s | 43,71 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 12 | 20 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 105 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | None | ||||||
| GPU cores | 11 | — | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 704 | — | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 300 MHz | — | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1250 MHz | — | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 1. 746 GFLOPS |
— | ||||||
| Socket | AM4, PGA-1331 | AM4, PGA-1331 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 95°C | 85°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 423 | 476 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 2.272 | 5.031 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 154 | 180 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 820 | 1.828 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1. 006 |
1.118 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 4.827 | 11.289 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.153 | 2.428 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 8.735 | 17.584 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
3.958 | 4.823 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
11.738 | 26.797 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
165,5 GFLOPS | 384,3 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
181 pts / W | 255 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is bigger, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is lower. Both were produced in the same year.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
476 5.031 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
423 2.272 |
In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 121%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
180 1.  828 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
154 820 |
In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 123%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
1.  11811.289 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
1.006 4.827 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 134%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
2.  42817.584 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
2.153 8.735 |
In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 101%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
4.823 26.  797 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
3.958 11.738 |
In single core, the difference is 22%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 128%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
5.027 26.264 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
4.160 12.101 |
In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 117%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
4.044 13.431 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
4.  16412.322 |
In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 9%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
4.820 26.430 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
4.342 14.684 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 80%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing.
This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 7 2700X Intel equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
AMD Ryzen 7 2700AMD Ryzen 7 2700EAMD Ryzen 7 2700U
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Summary
-
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
169%
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
116%
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
222%
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
| 16% higher single threaded performance. |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 122% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
| Around 69% higher average synthetic performance. |
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
| 40 watts lower power draw. |
| Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| 3DNow! | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSE4A | ||||
| AMD64 | ||||
| CnQ | ||||
| NX bit | ||||
| AMD-V | ||||
| SMT | ||||
| XFR | ||||
SSE4. 1 |
||||
| SSE4.2 | ||||
| AVX | ||||
| AES | ||||
| F16C | ||||
| BMI1 | ||||
Architecture
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | AMD Zen+ | vs | AMD Zen | |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR4 | |
| Codename | Zen | vs | Zen | |
| Release Date | Mar 2018 | vs | Jan 2018 |
Cores
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | vs | 4 | |
| Threads | 16 | vs | 8 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | No | vs | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Cache
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | vs | 128 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | vs | 512 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 16384 KB (shared) | vs | 1024 KB (shared) |
Physical
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | AMD Socket AM4 | |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | unknown | |
| Package | uPGA | vs | ||
| Die Size | 192mm² | vs | 246mm² | |
| Process | 14 nm | vs | 14 nm |
Performance
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3700 MHz | vs | 3600 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | 4350 MHz | vs | 3900 MHz | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
| Voltage | variable | vs | variable | |
| TDP | 105 W | vs | 65 W |
-
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
4785 points
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
4290 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
39723 points
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
19324 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
1828
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
820
points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
180
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
154
points — higher is better
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i5-2400: What is the difference?
52 BALLLA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
33 BALLLA
Intel Core i5-2400
Winter when comparing
VS
66 Facts compared to 9000 Is Ryzen 7 2700X better than Intel Core i5-2400?
- 2.
39x higher CPU speed?
8 x 3.7GHz vs 4 x 3.1GHz - 1600MHz higher RAM speed?
2933MHz vs 1333MHz - 12 more CPU threads?
16 vs 4 - 12.4°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
85°C vs 72.6°C - Semiconductor size 20nm smaller?
12nm vs 32nm - 0.9GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.3GHz vs 3.4GHz - 3MB more L2 cache?
4MB vs 1MB - 3.04x higher PassMark score?
17623 vs 5801
- 10W below TDP?
95W vs 105W - Does it have integrated graphics?
What are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
AMD RYZEN 5 5600X
9000 INTEL Core4000 INTEL CORE
AMD RYZEN 7 2700X
VS
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD Ryzen 700x
9000.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600g
AMD Ryzen 5600.S. i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i3-3220
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800x
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core
AMD RYTR AMD RYTR AMD Ry vs
AMD RYZEN 7 3700X
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i3-6100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600x
9000 INTEL Core INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL Core 9000
Intel Core i5-4570
AMD RYZEN 7 2700X
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5500u
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i5-2500
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5700g
000 AMD RYZEN Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD RYZEN 7 2700X
VS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900x
Intel Core
9000 VS
Intel CORE COREN
users reviews
General rating
AMD RYZEN 7 2700X
2 Reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
/10
9000
Intel Core i5-2400
5.
3 /10
3 User reviews0004 2 Votes
6.7 /10
3 Votes
Games
8.0 /10
2 VOTES
2.0 /10
9000 3 VOTES
9000 9000 9000 9000 9029 /
2 Votes
4.0 /10
3 Votes
Reliability
/10
2 VOTES
4.7 /10
9000 3 VOTES
Energy Efficiency
7.5 /10
2 VOTES
5.0 /10
3 Votes
CECRETION OF Central Processor
8 X 3.7GHZ
4 X 3.1GHZ
9000 processing per second can be performed by the processor, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
4.3GHz
3.
4GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
2MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene.
More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
∅
N/A
850MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
turbo GPU
∅
N/A
1100MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it may jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU Execution Units
∅
N/A
A Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
∅
N/A
By using multiple displays, you can expand your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
DirectX version
∅
N/A
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
∅
N/A
The newer the OpenGL version, the better the graphics in games.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Some applications use OpenCL to take advantage of graphics processing unit (GPU) power for non-graphics computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
textured units (TMUs)
∅
Not applicable
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
imaging units ROPs
∅
N/A
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
2933MHz
1333MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
43.71GB/s
21GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory recovery code
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
A newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Functions Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading provides better performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i5-2400
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i5-2400
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume.
Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✖Intel Core i5-2400
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✔Intel Core i5-2400
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.
interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Which CPUs are better?
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Main
- Compare CPU
 / 
 / 
Overall score
Issued
Q1/2018
Issued
Q2/2018
Overall score
Which is better AMD Ryzen 5 2400G or AMD Ryzen 7 2700X?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their characteristics and benchmark results.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz. 4 cores. Power consumption 65 W. Released Q1/2018.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has a maximum frequency of 3.
70 GHz. 8 cores. Power consumption 105 W. Released Q2/2018.
Differences
Characteristics
Benchmarks (tests)
Reviews
Differences
Reasons to choose
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Report a bug
Positions in benchmark results
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G CPU overall positions in popular benchmarks, to compare with other models.
-
Cinebench R23 (Single Core)
274 place
-
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
261 place
-
Cinebench R20 (Single Core)
336 place
-
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
293 place
-
Cinebench R15 (Single Core)
387 place
-
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
362 place
-
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
573 place
-
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
569 place
-
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
116 place
-
Blender 2.
81 (bmw27) 65 place
-
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
85 place
-
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
230 place
-
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
172 place
-
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
190 place
-
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
3 place
-
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
409 place
Reasons to choose
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Report a bug
-
Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
254 score
-
Higher clock speed
About 3%
higher clock speed3.
70 GHz 3.60 GHz -
More cores
2 more cores
8 4
-
Turbo 9 higher clock speed0003
About 9% better overclocked clock speed
4.30 GHz 3.90 GHz
Positions in benchmark results
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X CPU overall positions in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
-
Cinebench R23 (Single Core)
247 place
-
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
163 place
-
Cinebench R20 (Single Core)
293 place
-
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
158 place
-
Cinebench R15 (Single Core)
228 place
-
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
164 place
-
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
375 place
-
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
254 place
-
Monero Hashrate kH/s
49 place
-
Blender 2.
81 (bmw27) 144 place
-
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
27 place
-
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
133 place
-
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
49place
-
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
91 place
-
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
194 place
Characteristics
Technical data
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
CPU group and family
Reference information on compared processors, series, generation and market segment.
-
Segment
Desktop / Server Desktop / Server
-
Series
AMD Ryzen AMD Ryzen
-
Generation
1 2
-
CPU group
AMD Ryzen 2000G AMD Ryzen 2000
-
Successor
— AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
CPU specifications
Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, cache size.
These parameters indirectly speak about the speed of the processor, the higher they are, the better.
-
Frequency
3.60 GHz 3.70 GHz
-
CPU cores
4 8
-
Turbo (1 Core)
3.90 GHz 4.30 GHz
-
Threads
8 16
-
Hypertrading
Yes Yes
-
Acceleration
Yes Yes
-
Kernel architecture
normal normal
IGPU
Internal graphics does not affect CPU performance, performs the work of a graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
-
GPU
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics no iGPU
-
GPU frequency
1.25GHz
-
GPU (Turbo)
no turbo no turbo
-
Processing units
11
-
Shaders
704
-
Max. GPU Memory
2GB —
-
Max. displays
3
-
Generation
8
-
DirectX Version
12
-
Tech.
process 14nm
-
Issue
Q1/2018
Hardware codec support
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speed up the work with the required operations.
RAM & PCI Specifications
Types, number of channels of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and AMD Ryzen 5 2400G. Higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported depending on motherboards.
-
Memory type
DDR4-2933 DDR4-2933
-
Maximum memory
64GB 64GB
-
ECC
Yes Yes
-
Memory channels
2 2
-
PCIe version
3.
0 3.0 -
PCIe channels
12 20
Encryption
-
AES-NI
Yes Yes
Power Consumption
Compare AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and AMD Ryzen 7 2700X TDP requirements for cooling system selection. The TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
Technologies and extensions
Architecture, interfaces, instruction sets supported by AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and AMD Ryzen 5 2400G, virtualization technology and process technology.
-
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
-
Virtualization
AMD-V, SVM AMD-V, SVM
-
ISA Extensions
SSE4a, SSE4.
1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 -
Cash L3
4.00MB 16.00MB
-
Architecture
Raven Ridge (Zen) Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+)
-
Tech. process
14 nm 12 nm
-
Socket
AM4 AM4
-
Issue
Q1/2018 Q2/2018
Benchmarks (tests)
CPUs performance tests
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance difference between AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and AMD Ryzen 7 2700X.
Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best processor! Cinebench R23 (Single-Core) Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 SC — high load CPU test for long tasks on desktop or laptop, uses single CPU core, no hyper-threading.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 MC is a high load CPU benchmark for long running tasks on desktop or laptop using multi-core mode and hyper trading.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 SC pushes desktop or laptop compute modules to the limit and accurately captures key hardware performance parameters. Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform benchmark for desktop or mobile processors that is memory intensive.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance benchmark for desktop or mobile processors that is memory intensive and multi-threaded.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Blender 2.