Porovnání AMD Ryzen 7 2700 vs. AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Porovnání procesorů
Detail procesoru
Fotogalerie
Kde koupit?
Zobrazit recenze
Detail procesoru
Fotogalerie
Kde koupit?
Zobrazit recenze
Celkové hodnocení
PORAŽENÝ
VÍTĚZ
Nejlepší poměr cena/výkon
PORAŽENÝ
VÍTĚZ
Pokud se rozhodujete mezi procesory AMD Ryzen 7 2700 a AMD Ryzen 5 3600, pak je procesor
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 jasná volba — má celkově lepší parametry a také poměr cena/výkon!
Obecné
Výrobce
AMD
AMD
Výrobní technologie
12 nm
7 nm
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 má efektivnější technologii výroby než AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Příkon (TDP)
65 W
65 W
Oba procesory mají stejný příkon
Patice (Socket)
AMD AM4
AMD AM4
Počet jader a vláken
Počet jader procesoru
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 má 1. 33x více jader než AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Počet výpočetních vláken
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 má 1.33x více výpočetních vláken než AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Frekvence
Základní frekvence procesoru
3,2 GHz
3,6 GHz
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 má o 13 % vyšší základní frekvenci než AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Maximální frekvence (Boost)
4,1 GHz
4,2 GHz
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 má o 2 % vyšší maximální frekvenci než AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Možnost taktování
ano
neuvedeno
Cache
Velikost L1 cache
neuvedeno
384 kB
Velikost L2 cache
neuvedeno
3072 kB
Velikost L3 cache
neuvedeno
32768 kB
Výkon
Celkové skóre procesoru
15 774
17 801
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 má obecně o 13 % vyšší celkový výkon než AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Skóre jednoho vlákna
2 191
2 569
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 má o 17 % vyšší výkon na jednom výpočetním vlákně než AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Skóre herní fyziky
7 397
6 999
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 má o 6 % vyšší výkon při výpočtu herní fyziky než AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Operační paměť
Podporovaný typ paměti
DDR4
DDR4
Maximální počet kanálů
Oba procesory podporují stejný počet paměťových kanálů
Chladič
Chladič v balení
ano
ano
Součástí balení obou procesorů je chladič
Typ chladiče
Wraith Spire
Wraith Stealth
Další funkce a vlastnosti
Produktová řada
AMD Ryzen 7
AMD Ryzen 5
Mikroarchitektura
Zen+
Zen 2
Kódový název
Pinnacle Ridge
Matisse
Přibližná cena
Přibližná cena
11 000 Kč
5 000 Kč
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 je o 55 % levnější než AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Upozornění: Porovnání těchto produktů je vytvářeno automaticky na základě jejich parametrů, uživatelského hodnocení a ceny.
Jedná se o systémové řešení pro usnadnění vašeho výběru, nikoli o přímé doporučení redakce Cena-Vykon.cz. Nalezli jste chybu v parametrech nebo se vám nezdá výsledné hodnocení? Dejte nám vědět!
Uživatelské hodnocení
100 % (
zobrazit recenze)
100 % (
zobrazit recenze)
Celkové hodnocení
PORAŽENÝ
VÍTĚZ
Nejlepší poměr cena/výkon
PORAŽENÝ
VÍTĚZ
Pokud se rozhodujete mezi procesory AMD Ryzen 7 2700 a AMD Ryzen 5 3600, pak je procesor
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 jasná volba — má celkově lepší parametry a také poměr cena/výkon!
Další srovnání
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 vs. AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs. Intel Core i5-9400F vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs. AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs. Intel Core i5-10400F vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs. Intel Core i5-10400 vs.  Intel Core i5-11400F |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 2700 — VCV Rack
mdsva
(mdsva)
#1
Out of these two options, which will Rack take the most advantage of? I’m leaning towards the 3600, given that it’s a newer, faster chip, yet i wonder about the extra cores available on the 2700.
David
(David Rodriguez)
#2
the Ryzen 7 is better no doubt,
I have a Ryzen 5 beside a Radeon Vega graphics in my laptop and it work pretty nice with the rack + renoise on Linux (xfce)
rsmus7
(Stephan)
#3
I have a Ryzen 7 1700 in my desktop,
usually I use 4 cores in vcv seldom I use more cores,
the cpu has enough power,
the gpu needs to be fast for vcv,
I use a GTX1050 that is doing the job ok,
but this could even be a bit faster imho
attheleash
#4
The 3600 should be significantly better despite it having 2 less cores.
All the DAWBench and other DSP benchmark scores I know of are using the 2700X (which has higher base and turbo speed) rather than the 2700, but even then, the 3600 seems to be beating it by 20-30%
AMD 3K has greatly improved architecture, 3600 has double the L3 cache of 2700 and less cores to share it between as well.
1 Like
mdsva
(mdsva)
#5
I’m going with the 3600, thank you!
2 Likes
LarsBjerregaard
(Lars Bjerregaard)
#6
Good choice.
It looks like it has stellar single-core performance for a fantastic price. Good choice for Rack!
Dionisio
(Dionisio)
#7
If you want to go with Ryzen 5 3600, why not the Ryzen 5 3600X?
I think the price difference is not too much and you get a more powerful CPU.
1 Like
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs. AMD Ryzen 7 2700
GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
MORE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X runs with 6 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 4.60 GHz base 4.30 GHz all cores while the TDP is set to 65 W .The CPU connects to CPU socket AM4 (LGA 1331) This version includes 32.
00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-3200 RAM, and supports 4.0 PCIe Gen 20 . Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Vermeer (Zen 3) architecture has been improved in 7 nm and supports AMD-V, SVM . The product was launched Q4/2020
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 runs with 8 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 4.10 GHz base 3.60 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU connects to socket CPU AM4 (LGA 1331) This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2933 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 20 . Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, the Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) architecture has been advanced over 12 nm and supports AMD-V, SVM . The product was launched by Q2/2018
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Compare parts
| 3.70 GHZ | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
| 6 | Kernels | 8 |
4. 60GHz |
Turbo (1 core) | 4.10 GHz |
| 4.30GHz | Turbo (all cores) | 3.60 GHz |
| Yes | Hyper Threading | Yes |
| Yes | Acceleration | Yes |
| normal | Basic architecture | normal |
| no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
| no turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 7 nm | Technology | 12nm |
| no turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| DirectX Version | ||
| Max. displays | ||
| DDR4-3200 | memory size | DDR4-2933 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | ||
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
3. 00MB |
L2 Cache | — |
| 32.00MB | L3 Cache | 16.00MB |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | 20 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 12nm |
| AM4 (LGA 1331) | Connector | AM4 (LGA 1331) |
| 65 W | TDP | 65W |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Q4/2020 | Release date | Q2/2018 |
|
Show more details |
Show more details |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Blender 2.
81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D.
The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Monero Hashrate kH/s
Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only be computed efficiently using either a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU).
The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a large number of CPU cores, cache, and fast memory connectivity through as many memory channels as possible.
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | |
| 65 W | Max TDP | 65W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Operating cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Operating cost per year | NA |
Popular comparison
Comments
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600X —
VS
processor comparison and benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Which one to choose?
It’s time to choose the winner.
What is the difference and which is better in AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600X comparison? Which processor is more powerful and faster? It is quite simple to determine — look at the comparative table of all characteristics. A processor with more cores/threads, as well as a higher frequency and large L2-L3 is the absolute winner!
Cores, base and turbo frequency of the processor
Who will win in the comparison of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and AMD Ryzen 5 3600X. The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of cores, threads, base and turbo clock speed + L2-L3 volume. The more cores, L3, and clock speed, the more efficient the processor. Please note that high specifications require the use of a powerful cooling system.
3.70 GHz
Clock frequency
3.80 GHZ
8
Number of nuclei
6
4.30 GHZ
turbo (1 core)
4.40 GHZ
16
Number YES
Acceleration
YES
3.
85 GHZ
Turbo (8 Cores)
turbo (6 nuclei)
4.20 GHZ
Family and generation of processor
Internal graphics
It’s hard to compare AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X when graphics card function and specifications matter only in laptops. In workstations, this is not an advantage, due to the installation of an additional graphics accelerator.
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
—
Maximum memory
—
Hardware codec support
Here we are dealing with some CPU manufacturer specifications. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.
NO
H364
NO
NO
JPEG
NO
No
H365 8BIT
NO
No
H365 10BIT
9000 2 NO
NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO 9000 NO
VP9
No.
NO
VC-1
NO
NO
AVC
NO
RAM and PCIe
These are memory standards supported by processors. The processor can support multi-channel RAM with a high clock speed, this directly affects its speed and performance.
DDR4-2933
Type of memory
DDR4-3200
64 GB
version of PCIE
4.03
PCIE Lines
200003
Crystation
Support for data encryption
YES
AES-Ni
YES
Memory & PCIe
Thermal management and TDP
Today’s systems are loaded with demanding games and workloads that unleash the full potential of the processor. When choosing between AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and AMD Ryzen 5 3600X, it is better to choose the option with less heat dissipation (TDP).
105 W
TDP
95 W
95 °C
Maximum temperature
95 °C
—
Maximum TDP
—
—
TDP Down
—
Technical details
16.
00 MB
L3-CACHE
32.00 MB
12 NM 9000
7 nm (Matisse)
Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)
Architecture
Zen 2
AMD-V, SEV
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
AM4
JOT (SPECE)
AM AM AM AM AM0003
Gaming PC
Used in
Multimedia, Office PC
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
This synthetic benchmark will help you determine the actual processing power of a single CPU core. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and uses various test scenarios
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
210 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT
Cinebench R11.
5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 performs simultaneous cross-platform tests on all processor cores. Running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will unleash the full potential of your single-core Intel or AMD 9 processor0003
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
1872 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT
Cinebench R15 (Single Core)
The latter is used to create 3D models and shapes. Cinebench R15 is used to benchmark the performance of single core processors. Hyperthreading capability is not taken into account. It is an updated version of Cinebench 11.
5. Like all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite software
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
177 (86%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT
204 (100%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 can be used to test the performance of multi-core processors. The test produces accurate and reliable results. This benchmark is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5, which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.
70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
1817 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT
1647 (90%)
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. This is software used to create 3D shapes. The benchmark runs in single-core mode without considering the possibility of hyper-threading.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
411 (82%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT
501 (100%)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
This is a new version of the benchmark based on Cinebench R15 (both versions are based on Cinema 4, the most popular 3D modeling software).
Cinebench R20 is used for benchmark tests of multi-core processor performance and hyper-threading capabilities.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
3951 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT
3751 (94%)
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is a new version of the most popular single-core CPU rendering benchmark Cinebench. We have results for all modern processors
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.
80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT
1286 (100%)
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is a new version of the most popular multi-core CPU rendering benchmark, Cinebench. We have results for all 9 modern processors0003
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
10545 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT
9588 (90%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a benchmark for 64-bit Intel and AMD processors. It uses a new power rating system for a single processor core.
This software simulates real scenarios for accurate results
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
4850 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 supports multi-core AMD and Intel processors. Based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows you to get the real comparative potential of the processor
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
26040 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.
80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is the latest software. Completely new algorithms provide fairly accurate test results for single-core processors.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
1062 (85%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT
1245 (100%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 software package shows benchmark results for memory performance and multi-core processor speed. This takes into account the ability to hyperthreading.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
7100 (100%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT
6992 (98%)
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
We use the Blender benchmark to monitor CPU performance. Test results show how fast the device performs when performing multi-processor tasks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
2112 (90%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.
80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT
2339 (100%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
It tests all and general CPU performance (math calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphics tests). Please note that data may differ from actual situations.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
16970 (82%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT
20491 (100%)
Monero Hashrate kH/s
Using a graphics card (GPU) is the ideal way to mine Monero. Although it requires a significantly higher investment compared to using the CPU, the hashrate is significantly higher.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8x 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
600 (80%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
6x 3.80 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT
750 (100%)
Popular CPU comparisons
| one. |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
|
2.
|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X vs. Intel Core i5-10400F |
|
| 3. |
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|
| four. |
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
|
| 5. |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Intel Core i7-9700K |
|
| 6. |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
|
7.
|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X vs. AMD Ryzen 7 5800X |
|
| eight. |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|
| 9. |
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
|
| ten. |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G |
|
| eleven. |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|
| 12. |
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X vs. AMD Ryzen 7 5700G |
|
| 13. |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Intel Core i3-10100F |
|
fourteen.
|