8370 vs 8350: UserBenchmark: AMD FX-8350 vs FX-8370

AMD FX-8350 vs AMD FX-8370

• Home

&nbsp/&nbsp

• CPU comparison

&nbsp/&nbsp

Overall score

Released
Q4/2012

Released
Q3/2014

Overall score

What’s the best choice AMD FX-8350 or AMD FX-8370?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

AMD FX-8350 has a maximum frequency of 4.00 GHz. 8 Cores. Power consumption of 125 W. Released in Q4/2012.

AMD FX-8370 has a maximum frequency of 4.00 GHz. 8 Cores. Power consumption of 125 W. Released in Q3/2014.

Differences
Specifications
Benchmarks
Testimonials

Differences

Reasons to consider
AMD FX-8350

Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-8350 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

• Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

  386 place

• Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

  289 place

• Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

  520 place

• Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

  371 place

• Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

  813 place

• Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

  452 place

• Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

  1064 place

• Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

  815 place

• Blender 2. 81 (bmw27)

  38 place

• Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

  589 place

• Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

  352 place

• Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

  367 place

• Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

  299 place

• Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

  592 place

Reasons to consider
AMD FX-8370

Report a bug

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-8370 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

• Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

  525 place

• Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

  374 place

• Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

  806 place

• Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

  444 place

• Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

  1048 place

• Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

  804 place

• Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

  580 place

• Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

  350 place

• Cinebench R11. 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

  354 place

• Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

  282 place

• Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

  588 place

Specifications

Technical data

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8370

CPU family and group

Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.

CPU Technical specs

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.

• Frequency

  4.00 GHz 4.00 GHz

• CPU Cores

  8 8

• Turbo (1 Core)

  4.20 GHz 4.30 GHz

• CPU Threads

  8 8

• Turbo (8 Cores)

  4. 10 GHz 4.15 GHz

• Hyperthreading

  No No

• Overclocking

  Yes Yes

• Core architecture

  normal normal

IGPU

Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

• GPU name

  no iGPU no iGPU

• GPU (Turbo)

  No turbo No turbo

Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.

Memory specs & PCI

Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by AMD FX-8370 and AMD FX-8350. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.

• Memory type

  DDR3-1866

• ECC

  Yes Yes

• Memory channels

  2 2

Encryption

• AES-NI

  Yes Yes

Thermal Management

Compare the TDP requirements of TDP AMD FX-8350 and AMD FX-8370 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

• TDP (PL1)

  125 W 125 W

Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by AMD FX-8350 and AMD FX-8350, virtual machine technologies and process technology.

• Instruction set (ISA)

  x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)

• Virtualization

  AMD-V AMD-V

• ISA extensions

  SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4

• L3-Cache

  8.00 MB 8.00 MB

• Architecture

  Vishera (Bulldozer) Vishera (Bulldozer)

• Technology

  32 nm 32 nm

• Socket

  AM3+ AM3+

• Release date

  Q4/2012 Q3/2014

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between AMD FX-8350 and AMD FX-8370.

Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 SC is a high load CPU test for long tasks on a desktop or notebook PC, uses one CPU core, with no hypetrading

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8370

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 MC is a high load CPU test for long tasks on a desktop or notebook PC, using a multi-core and hyperthreading

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8370

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8370

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8370

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8370

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8370

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8370

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8370

Cinebench R11. 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8370

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8370

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks

AMD FX-8350

AMD FX-8370

Latest comparisons

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

Intel Core i5-13450HX

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

Intel Core i5-13400T

Raspberry Pi 3 B+ (Broadcom BCM2837B0)

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

Intel Core i7-12700H

Intel Core i5-8400

Intel Core i7-10700K

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS

Intel Core i5-13420H

Intel Core i7-9700

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

Apple M2 Pro

Intel Processor N200

Intel Pentium Silver J5005

Intel Processor N200

Intel Celeron J4105

Intel Core i5-13400F

Intel Core i5-8265U

Intel Processor N200

Intel Celeron N4000

Intel Processor N200

Intel Celeron N3000

Intel Core i7-6700K

Intel Core i9-13900KF

AMD Launches x86 Piledriver Based 125W FX-8370 and 95W FX-8370E, FX-8320E Refresh CPU Lineup

The last AMD announcement for today is the new x86 Piledriver CPU refresh which includes the FX-8370, FX-8370E and FX-8320E processors. The new FX CPU refresh comes four months after Intel launched their very own Haswell Refresh lineup which includes the Devil’s Canyon processor. Rather than focusing on performance, AMD targets Intel with their brute pricing model which offers users a 4.4 GHz clock chip with 8 Cores at a low price of $199.99 US.

AMD Launches x86 Piledriver Based 125W FX-8370 and 95W FX-8370E, FX-8320E

Back at the Radeon event held last week, AMD demonstrated a live overclocking preview of the FX-8370 processor where renowned overclocker «Chew» from Xtremesystems overclocked the chip past 8 GHz and even got to see a overclock world record of the FX-8370 a few days from overclocker «The Stilt» who had the chip clocked at an impressive 8.7 GHz on liquid nitrogen cooling. The show detailed nothing else regarding the FX processors but we already had received information on the new refresh chips prior to event so let’s do a quick run through of what we are looking at today.

Let’s get started with the FX-8370 now which will become the flagship x86 Piledriver processor of the original FX-8000 lineup until AMD plans to launch a new processor line (hopefully no refresh). AMD does have steamroller but they aren’t focusing it towards the high-end desktop market instead focusing it towards the APU market with their Kaveri APUs and Athlon processors. The FX-8370 is clocked at 4.30 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost clock and ships with a 8 MB L3 cache, 8 cores. 125W TDP and a price of $189 US. The FX-8370E on the other hand has the same specifications aside from the 3.3 GHz core and 4.3 GHz clock speeds maintaining a TDP of 95W. Both the FX-8370 and FX-8370E are priced at $199.99 US.

Next up, we have the FX-8320E which is an optimized FX-8320 with a core clock of 3.20 GHz, turbo clock of 4.00 GHz, an 8 MB L3 Cache and a 95W TDP. The processor is priced at $146.99 US. Finally, we have the FX-8300 which was introduced in the Chinese market which comes in at a 3.30 GHz core and 4.20 GHz boost clock followed by a 8 MB L3 cache, a 125W TDP and a price of around a 120 US dollars. With new chips and price cuts, AMD will try to gain some market share away from Intel’s Haswell line of processors. The recent 8 core offerings under $200 US seem good against the Core i3 and Core i5 lineup but enthusiasts still prefer to go for the Intel route when spending more than $200 US with processors such as the Core i5-4670K, Core i5-4690K, Core i7-4770K, Core i7-4790K and even the latest G3258 Pentium 20th Anniversary edition which is a good choice for budget users.

AMD has also adjusted their price model for their entire FX-8000 series lineup with the FX-9590 now coming in at $229.99 US (Liquid Cooling Bundle) and the FX-9370 coming in at $210.99 US (Liquid Cooling Bundle). The long running FX-8350 can be bought at a low price of $179.99 US while the FX-8320 retails for $146.99 US. The recent new comer, the FX-8310 is down to just $129.99 US.

On the FM2+ side, the Athlon II X4 860K, Athlon II X4 840 and Athlon X2 450 processors are coming out to the market soon.The steamroller based Athlon II X4 860K Quad Core chip features four threads, 3.7 GHz clock speed, 2 MB L2 cache and a 95W TDP. The boost clock is not known but considering the A10-7850K which is also a 3.7 GHz clocked chip jumps to 4.0 GHz in boost mode, we can see a similar boost clock for the Athlon X4 860K. The Athlon X4 840 is a quad core processor featuring a 3.4 GHz clock speed, 2 MB L2 cache, 95W TDP while the Athlon X2 450 is a dual core steamroller based processor of which details are not known at the moment. In addition to these, AMD also has two AM1 chips planned for launch which include the Ahtlon X4 550 and Athlon X4 530 processors based on the updated Jaguar architecture codenamed Puma.

AMD x86 Piledriver 2014 CPU Lineup:

	AMD FX-9590	AMD FX-9370	AMD FX-8370	AMD FX-8370E	AMD FX-8350	AMD FX-8320	AMD FX-8320E	AMD FX-8310	AMD FX-8300
Architecture	Piledriver	Piledriver	Piledriver	Piledriver	Piledriver	Piledriver	Piledriver	Piledriver	Piledriver
Family	Vishera	Vishera	Vishera	Vishera	Vishera	Vishera	Vishera	Vishera	Vishera
Manufacture	32 nm SOI HKMG	32 nm SOI HKMG	32 nm SOI HKMG	32 nm SOI HKMG	32 nm SOI HKMG	32 nm SOI HKMG	32 nm SOI HKMG	32 nm SOI HKMG	32 nm SOI HKMG
Cores	8 pcs.  (4 pcs. Modules)	8 pcs. (4 pcs. Modules)	8 pcs. (4 pcs. Modules)	8 pcs. (4 pcs. Modules)	8 pcs. (4 pcs. Modules)	8 pcs. (4 pcs. Modules)	8 pcs. (4 pcs. Modules)	8 pcs. (4 pcs. Modules)	8 pcs. (4 pcs. Modules)
CPU Clock Base	4.7 GHz	4.4 Ghz	4.3 GHz	3.3 GHz	4.0 GHz	3.5 GHz	3.2 GHz	3.4 GHz	3.3 GHz
CPU Turbo Core	5.0 GHz	4.7 GHz	4.4 GHz	4.3 GHz	4.2 GHz	4.0 GHz	4.0 GHz	4.3 GHz	4.2 GHz
L2 cache	4 x 2 MB	4 x 2 MB	4 x 2 MB	4 x 2 MB	4 x 2 MB	4 x 2 MB	4 x 2 MB	4 x 2 MB	4 x 2 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	8 MB	8 MB	8 MB	8 MB	8 MB	8 MB	8 MB	8 MB
Max.  DDR3	1866 MHz	1866 MHz	1866 MHz	1866 MHz	1866 MHz	1866 MHz	1866 MHz	1866 MHz	1866 MHz
TDP	220 W	220 W	125 W	95W	125 W	125 W	95W	95W	125 W
Base	AM3 +	AM3 +	AM3 +	AM3 +	AM3 +	AM3 +	AM3 +	AM3 +	AM3 +
Price	$229.99 US	$210.99 US	$199.99 US	$199.99 US	$179.99 US	$146.99 US	$146.99 US	$129.99 US	$119.99 US

 

AMD Kaveri APU/Athlon 2014 Lineup:

Model	AMD A10-7850K	AMD A10-7700K	AMD Athlon X4 860K	AMD Athlon X4 840	AMD Athlon X4 550	AMD Athlon X4 530	AMD A10-7800	AMD A8-7600	AMD A6-7400K	AMD A4-7300	AMD Athlon X2 450
Cores	4/4	4/4	4/4	4/4	4/4	4/4	4/4	4/4	2/2	2/2	2/2
Unlocked Design	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	Yes	Yes	No
Base Clock	3. 7 GHz	3.4 GHz	3.7 GHz	3.1 GHz	1.9 Ghz?	1.7 Ghz?	3.5 GHz	3.1 GHz	3.5 GHz	3.4 GHz	3.5 GHz
Turbo Clock	4.0 GHz	3.8 GHz	4.0 GHz	3.8 GHz	~2.2	~2.0	3.9 GHz	3.8 GHz	3.9 GHz	3.8 GHz	3.9 GHz
HSA Support	Yes	Yes	TBC	TBC	TBC	TBC	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	TBC
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB	2 MB	2 MB	2 MB	2 MB	4 MB	4 MB	1 MB	1 MB	1 MB
Graphics Core	Radeon R7	Radeon R7	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Radeon R7	Radeon R7	Radeon R5	Radeon R5	N/A
Compute Units	8	6	4	4	4	4	8	6	4	3	2
GPU Cores	512	384	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	512	384	256	192	N/A
GPU Clock	720 MHz	720 MHz	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	720 MHz	720 MHz	TBA	514 MHz	N/A
TDP	95W	95W	65W (Configurable TDP)	65W (Configurable TDP)	25W	25W	45W	45W	45W	45W	65W
Launch	14th January 2014	14th January 2014	Q3 2014	Q3 2014	Q3 2014	Q3 2014	31st July 2014	31st July 2014	31st July 2014	Q3 2014	Q3 2014
Price	$169 US	$139 US	$89. 99 US	$59.99 US	TBA	TBA	$149 US	$99 US	$75 US	$39 US	TBA

Share this story

Facebook

Twitter

AMD FX-8350 or AMD FX-8370

• FX-8350 vs AMD FX-8370

Family

• FX- 8300
  Compare
• FX-8320
  Compare
• FX-8320E
  Compare
• FX-8370
  Compare
• FX-8370E 90 022 Compare

Family

• FX-8300
  Compare
• FX-8320
  Compare
• FX-8320E
  Compare
• FX-8350
  Compare
• FX-8370E
  Compare

90 017

Game Speed ​​

FX-8350

49.3

FX-8370

50.1 (+2%)

Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.

The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed ​​in office use

FX-8350

52.1

FX-8370

52.9 (+2%)

Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed ​​in heavy applications

FX-8350

29.5

FX-8370

30.8 (+4%)

Performance in resource-intensive tasks that load the maximum 8 cores.

The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Price

The data is obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

Speed ​​of numerical operations

Simple household tasks

FX-8350 40.7 FX-8370 41.9 (+3%)

Demanding games and tasks

FX-8350 23.8 FX-8370 25.2 (+6%)

Extreme

FX-8350 6.5 FX-8370 6.9(+6%)

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is indicated in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

Cinebench R20 Single Core

AMD FX-8350

209 (+2%)

AMD FX-8370

204

Cinebench R20 Multi Core 9005 7

AMD FX-8350

1298 (+1%)

AMD FX-8370

1281

Cinebench R15 Multi Core

AMD FX-8350

665

AMD FX-8370

6 73 (+1%)

Geekbench 3 Multi Core

AMD FX-8350

11164

AMD FX-8370

11300 (+1%)

Cinebench R11.

5

AMD FX-8350

1.11

AMD FX-8370

1.14 (+3%)

Cinebench R11.5 90 057

AMD FX-8350

6.94

AMD FX-8370

7.02 (+1%)

Features

Basic

SocketInstalled in motherboards with a suitable socket. Note that a socket is not guaranteed to be compatible. The manufacturer may not add support to the BIOS.	AM3+	AM3+
Manufacturer Firm	AMD	AMD
Presentation datePresentation in mass media, official information.	2012-10-23	2014-09-02
Code name of the Microarchitecture family.	Vishera	Vishera
GenerationCode name for the microarchitecture generation.	FX (Vishera)	FX (Vishera)

Performance

Cores The total number of physical cores.	8	8
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees.	8	8
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications.	Missing	Missing
Base frequencyThe guaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in the case of the corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one.	4 GHz	4 GHz
Turbo frequency The maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under low-threaded loads, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU, but do not load all threads.	4.2 GHz	4.3 GHz
Free multiplier Allows you to specify any multiplier, which is convenient for manual overclocking. It’s worth mentioning that old-school multiplier or bus overclocking is a thing of the past.	No data	No data
BCLK System bus frequency. Some motherboards allow you to achieve a good performance boost by slightly raising the bus frequency. Often this has a bad effect on the stability of the system.	200	200
CPU multiplier. The final CPU frequency is determined by the simple formula BCLK * CPU multiplier. Modern processors instantly change the multiplier of each of the cores, taking into account the type of load, temperature, consumption and settings in the BIOS.	20	20
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly.	125 W	125 W

Cache and RAM

L1 Cache First level cache. Modern processors use a multi-level cache. The first is the fastest, but the smallest. In the case of an L1 access and a miss, the L2 cache is searched for the next stage.	384K	384K
L2 Cache Second level cache. Holds more data, but is slower.	8MB	8MB
L3 Cache L3 cache. AMD created the Ryzen 7 5800X3D with a record-breaking L3 volume, which reduced the requirements for memory frequency and significantly increased the number of frames in many games.	8MB (shared)	8MB (shared)
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price.	DDR3 Dual-channel	DDR3 Dual-channel

Video core

Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings.

N/A

N/A

PCI

PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility.

Gen 2

Gen 2

Detailed information

Architecture Code name for the microarchitecture generation.	Vishera	Vishera
Number of transistors	1,000,000	1,000,000
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. For Ryzen with a chiplet layout, the CCD process is implied.	32 nm	32 nm
Chip size Varies with process technology and number of transistors. For chiplet Ryzen, the area of ​​​​all CCDs is indicated.	315 mm²	315 mm²
Socket type	µPGA	µPGA
Spec Code	FD8350FRW8KHK FD8350FRHKBOX	FD8370FRW8KHK FD8370FRHKBOX

Which is better

AMD FX-8370

• On average, gaming performance is 2% better.
• The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 6%.
• In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 6%.
• Turbo boost frequency is 0.1 GHz higher.

How are they similar

• The number of physical cores is the same.
• The number of threads is equal.
• The base frequency is equal.
• TDP is equal.

Your comment can be here
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8370E and AMD FX-8350 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization.


Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD FX-8370E

versus

AMD FX-8350

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD FX-8370E

• Newer processor, release date difference 1 year(s) 10 month(s) 900 04
• Approximately 2% higher clock frequency: 4.3 GHz vs 4.2 GHz
• About 16% more max core temperature: 71°C vs 61°C
• About 32% less power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
• 5.1 times greater performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 2859 vs 566
• 4. 3 times greater performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 11715 vs 2751

Date issue	September 2014 vs 23 October 2012
Maximum frequency	4.3 GHz vs 4.2 GHz
Maximum core temperature	71°C vs 61°C
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt vs 125 Watt
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	2859 vs 566
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	11715 vs 2751

Reasons to choose AMD FX-8350

• PassMark — Single thread mark about 9% better performance: 1580 vs 1450
• PassMark — CPU mark about 13% more performance: 6035 vs 5318
• CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (Frames/s) about 5% faster performance: 9.886 vs 9.383
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 5% faster performance: 21.912 vs 20.879
• About 6% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.424 vs 0.401
• About 22% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) : 1.199 vs 0.984
• Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 34% better: 7.137 vs 5.33

PassMark — Single thread mark 9011 5	1580 vs 1450
PassMark — CPU mark	6035 vs 5318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	9.886 vs 9.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	21. 912 vs 20.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.424 vs 0.401
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	1.199 vs 0.984
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	7.137 vs 5.33

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: AMD FX-8370E
CPU 2: AMD FX-8350

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	20.879 21.912
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2

Name	AMD FX-8370E	AMD FX-8350
PassMark — Single thread mark	1450	1580
PassMark — CPU mark	5318	6035
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	2859	566
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	11715	2751
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	0	1337
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	9.383	9.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	20.879	21.912
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.401	0.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	0.984	1.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	5.33	7.137

Performance comparison

	AMD FX-8370E	AMD FX-8350
Architecture name	Vishera	Vishera
Production date	September 2014	October 23, 2012
Place in the ranking	1684	2308
Price now	$223. 87	$79.99
Price/performance ratio (0-100)	10.27	32.95
Applicability	Desktop	Desktop
Family		AMD FX-Series Processors
OPN PIB		FD8350FRHKBOX
OPN Tray		FD8350FRW8KHK
Series		AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors
Support 64 bit
Crystal area	315 mm	315 mm
Level 2 cache	8192KB	8MB
Process	32 nm	32nm SOI
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	61°C
Maximum frequency	4.