What’s the Difference (Focus on 5 Aspects)
What is Samsung 960 EVO? What is Samsung 970 EVO? What are the differences between Samsung 960 EVO and 970 EVO? This post from MiniTool will compare Samsung 960 EVO and Samsung 970 EVO.
What Is Samsung 960 EVO?
Samsung 960 EVO is an NVMe SSD, which is a good choice for users who pursue high performance. The Samsung 960 EVO SSD provides enhanced bandwidth, a new controller and Samsung’s intelligent TurboWrite technology so that it delivers the next level of performance, beyond what the SATA interface can provide.
The Samsung 960 EVO SSD also comes with the newly upgraded Magician which helps users to monitor, manage and maintain the drive. In addition, Samsung 960 EVO SSD also comes with solid reliability.
What Is Samsung 970 EVO?
Samsung 970 EVO provides breakthrough speeds, best-in-class reliability, and a wide range of capacity options up to 2TB. The Samsung 970 EVO SSD comes with the latest V-NAND, new Phoenix and Intelligent TurboWrite technology so that it can enhance high-end gaming and 4k graphic editing.
It is compact with M.2 form factor, thus greatly expanding storage capacity and saving space for other components. It also has exceptional endurance.
After learning some basic information about Samsung 960 EVO and Samsung 970 EVO, what are their differences and which one is better? So, just keep on your reading and find answers in the following part.
960 EVO vs 970 EVO: What Are the Differences?
- Form Factor and Interface
- Capacity
- Performace
- Reliability and Warranty
- Price
960 EVO vs 970 EVO: Which One Is Better?
In this part, we will show you the differences between Samsung 960 EVO and 970 EVO. We will focus on 5 aspects including form factor and interface, capacity, performance, reliability and warranty, and price.
1. 960 EVO vs 970 EVO: Form Factor and Interface
In a solid-state drive, the form factor decides and prescribes the size, shape and other physical specifications of a drive.
The hard disk interface is the connection part between the hard disk and the host system. It is used to transfer data between the hard disk cache and the host memory. Therefore, different hard disk interfaces determine the connection speed between hard disk and computer.
So, as for Samsung 960 EVO vs 970 EVO, what are their form factor and interfaces?
Samsung 960 EVO comes with M.2 form factors and it is available in PCIe 3.0×4 and NVMe 1.2 interfaces. The Samsung 970 EVO also comes with M.2 2280 form factor, with the PCIe Gen 3.0×4 and NVMe 1.3 interfaces.
2. 960 EVO vs 970 EVO: Capacity
When selecting a solid-state drive, storage size is a key factor to be considered since a larger hard drive capacity enables you to save more files and data.
So, as for Samsung 970 EVO vs 960 EVO, what are their differences?
| Samsung 960 EVO | Samsung 970 EVO | |
| Capacity | 250 GB, 500 GB, 1,000 GB | 250GB, 500GB, 1,000GB, 2,000GB |
From the above chart, you can find that Samsung 970 EVO provides more available choices and it is up to 2000GB, which is larger than the Samsung 960 EVO SSD.
Hence, you can choose any one based on your own needs.
3. 960 EVO vs 970 EVO: Performance
The performance could be one of the most important factors to be considered when choosing an SSD. An SSD with good performance may boost your computer performance, enable it to run faster or decrease the gaming loading time.
So, here we will take about the performance of Samsung 960 EVO 1TB and Samsung 970 EVO 1TB. Look at the following chart.
| Samsung 960 EVO 1TB | Samsung 970 EVO 1TB | |
| Sequential Read | 3200 MB/s | 3400 MB/s |
| Sequential Write | 1900 MB/s | 2500 MB/s |
| Random Read | 38,000 IOPS (Thread 4) 14,000 IOPS (Thread 1) |
500,000 IOPS (Thread 4) 15, 000 IOPS (Thread 1) |
| Random Write | 36,000 IOPS (Thread 4) 50,000 IOPS (Thread 1) |
450, 000 IOPS (Thread 4) 50,000 IOPS (Thread 1) |
All statistics are from Samsung’s official site.
From the above chart, as for Samsung EVO 960 vs 970 1TB, you can find that the Samsung 970 EVO 1TB provides better read and write performance than Samsung 960 EVO 1TB. In addition, the larger capacity the hard drive has, the faster read and write speed it has. So, the Samsung 970 EVO 2TB would enjoy better performance.
4. 960 EVO vs 970 EVO: Reliability and Warranty
As for Samsung 970 EVO vs 960 EVO, we will show you the fourth aspect – reliability and warranty.
Both of them provide good reliability and warranty. Both of them provide 1.5 million hours of reliability. Samsung 960 EVO SSD is backed with a limited 3-year warranty, while the Samsung 970 EVO SSD is backed with a limited 5-year warranty.
5. 960 EVO vs 970 EVO: Price
Here, we will show you the last difference between Samsung 960 EVO and Samsung 970 EVO. It is the price. In general, the budget influences you from choosing a disk. According to the official site, the 1TB Samsung 970 EVO is about $129.
99, but the price of Samsung 960 EVO is not available.
So, if you want to know more prices of these Samsung SSDs, you can go to other platforms, such as Amazon, etc. Then choose the most suitable one. Besides, when selecting the SSD, you need to check the interface of the computer and choose the correct one.
From the above part, you have known some differences between 960 EVO and 970 EVO. Apart from them, they also have some other differences, such as power consumption, etc. But after reading the above part, you may already have the answers.
In my opinion, Samsung 970 EVO is better than Samsung 960 EVO because it has a larger hard drive capacity, provides faster read and write speed, and has a longer warranty.
960 EVO vs 970 EVO, what are their differences? This post may help you to decide which one is better because it elaborates on their differences. I’d like to share this post with more friends.Click to Tweet
But, both Samsung SSDs provide good performance than the traditional SATA hard drive.
So, they can improve computer performance and decrease system loading time. On the other hand, they come with a large hard drive capacity, allowing you to save a lot of files, folders, pictures, movies, videos, and so on.
Hence, some users would choose to migrate their OS to the Samsung 960 EVO or Samsung 970 EVO SSD so as to make their computer faster. Or, some users would like to upgrade to Samsung 970 EVO who are using Samsung 960 EVO.
So, how to migrate OS to Samsung 960 EVO or Samsung 970 EVO without data loss?
How to Migrate OS to Samsung 960 EVO or Samsung 970 EVO?
To clone OS from HDD to SSD without data loss, you need to use a clone tool. Thus, the professional hard drive clone tool – MiniTool ShadowMaker is recommended. It allows you to migrate the operating system to the Samsung 960 EVO or Samsung 970 EVO SSD with just a few steps.
Now, we will show you how to use MiniTool ShadowMaker to clone OS to the Samsung 960 EVO or Samsung 970 EVO SSD.
1.
Connect the Samsung SSD to your computer.
2. Download MiniTool ShadowMaker from the following button, install it and launch it.
Free Download
3. Click Keep Trial.
4. Then you will enter the main interface of MiniTool ShadowMaker and go to the Tools page.
5. Next, click Clone Disk to continue.
6. On the next page, click the Source module to select the disk clone source. Here, you need to choose the original system disk as the clone source, and then click Finish to continue.
7. Click the Destination module to select a target disk. Here, you need to select the Samsung 960 EVO or Samsung 970 EVO SSD as the target disk. Then click Finish to continue.
8. Then you will receive a warning message which tells you that all data on the target disk will be destroyed during the cloning process. If you have important files on it, please back up them first.
9. Then the disk clone process will begin. The time it costs depends on the number of files on the source hard drive. Do not interrupt it until it is finished. Otherwise, your target disk will be unbootable.
When the disk cloning process is finished, you will receive a message which tells you that the source disk and the target disk have the same signature and either of them will be marked offline if both are connected to your computer. So, you need to remove or disconnect either of them.
In this post, you need to remove the original hard drive and then install the Samsung 960 EVO SSD or Samsung 970 EVO SSD on your computer. Then enter the BIOS to change the boot order.
After all steps are finished, you have migrated OS to the Samsung SSD with MiniTool ShadowMaker and your computer performance will be improved. In addition, MiniTool ShadowMaker is also a piece of professional Windows backup software, which is designed to back up files, folders, disks, partitions, and the operating system.
As for 960 EVO vs 970 EVO, this post has shown 5 aspects. If you do not know which one is better and have difficulty in choosing which one, read the above content to find answers. In my opinion, Samsung 970 EVO is a litter better than Samsung 960 EVO.
If you have any different ideas of Samsung 960 vs 970 EVO or have any problem with MiniTool ShadowMaker, you can leave a message in the comment zone or feel free to contact us via the email [email protected] and we will reply to you as soon as possible.
960 EVO vs 970 EVO FAQ
What’s the difference between 970 EVO and 970 EVO Plus?
970 EVO and 970 EVO Plus are the solid-state drives of Samsung. Performance is one of the differences between 970 EVO and 970 EVO Plus. And the major difference between these two Samsung SSDs is the increased density or layer comprising the memory modules. 970 EVO uses the 64-layer of V-NAND, while 970 EVO Plus uses 96-layer.
Is the 970 EVO worth it?
Samsung 970 EVO provides a large storage size and provides fast read and write performance.
It also comes with longer reliability and warranty. In addition, it is reasonably priced. So, if you want to use it to save files or improve computer performance, it would be a good choice.
How long will a 970 EVO last?
According to the official site, Samsung 970 EVO is able to last 1.5 million hours.
Does the 970 EVO need a heatsink?
M.2 NVME SSDs like the Samsung 970 EVO should be used with a heatsink. Motherboard makers provide them with the slots on their boards that can run the NVME spec. NVME drives can get very hot under sustained use and will suffer performance issues if running too hot. Besides, long term overheating could cause hard drive issue and shorten its lifespan.
Samsung SSD 970 Pro And 970 EVO Review: Faster, More Endurance Than 960
Samsung has been at the forefront of NVMe-based solid state storage essentially since the standard’s inception.
The Samsung SSD 960 Pro and 960 EVO that were released all the way back in 2016 have been among the best performing, most sought after M.2 NVMe-based gumsticks available. It’s kind of hard to believe the 960 Pro and 960 EVO have been riding high for so long in such a rapidly advancing space, but it’s true. Samsung, however, is finally ready to supplant its popular drives with the brand-new – you guessed it – SSD 970 Pro and 970 EVO series that we’re going to be showing you here today.
The Samsung SSD 970 Pro and 970 EVO are the company’s latest flagship sold state drives for high-performance desktop and mobile applications. They feature new controllers, the latest NAND, updated firmwares, and some subtle new features, all designed to boost performance and reliability. We’ve got both drives in hand and have put them through their paces on our freshly-updated test bed, alongside a quartet of competing products. But before we dive into the numbers, let’s check out some specifications.
..
Update: 2/25/2019 — Be sure to check out our full deep dive review, with tons of benchmarks, on Samsung’s new SSD 970 EVO Plus Solid State Drive. It’s the new EVO optimized for speed, with significantly faster write performance and density up to 2TB.
|
Find The Samsung SSD 970 EVO and 970 Pro @ Amazon
The Samsung SSD 970 PRO NVMe M.2 series drives will initially be offered in two capacities — 512GB and 1TB. The 970 EVO, however, will be offered in four capacities, ranging from 250GB all the way on up to a beefy 2TB. We’ve got a 512GB 970 Pro and a 1TB 970 EVO to show you here.
All of the drives in both the Samsung SSD 970 Pro and 970 EVO line-ups have the same M.2 (2280) ‘gumstick’ form factor and offer peak read bandwidth of 3.5GB/s. Write bandwidth on the 970 Pro tops out at 2.7GB/s, while the 970 EVO peaks at 2.5GB/s – that’s a healthy bump up from the 960 Pro’s max of about 2.1GB/s for writes. The drives’ max IOPS ratings vary depending on queue depth, but peak at right around 500K. The drives’ endurance ratings also vary, but based on capacity, and peak at 1200TBW on the 1TB 970 Pro and 2TB 970 EVO. Endurance drops as capacities decrease, as you would expect.
All of the drives in the Samsung SSD 970 Pro series feature new, 64-layer 2-bit MLC V-NAND flash memory and a new Phoenix controller, which has a native PCIe gen 3 interface and supports the NVMe 1.3 protocol. Other details are scarce on the controller, but Samsung claims it enables enhanced performance and has improved thermal characteristics, thanks to a new nickel coating on the controller itself that helps to better dissipate heat.
One of the controller’s cores is dedicated to optimizing communications between it and the host system, and the controller is clocked higher than the controllers on previous-gen drives as well, to boost peak transfer speeds and reduce latency. The Phoenix controller supports all of the features you’d expect from a current SSD, like TRIM, garbage collection, S.M.A.R.T., etc., and it supports various encryption technologies as well. Depending on the capacity, all of the drives also feature 512MB to 2GB of discrete LPDDR4 DRAM cache.
The 970 EVO differs from the Pro in that it uses 3-bit TLC V-NAND and features TurboWrite technology, like some previous generation EVO-series drives. TurboWrite essentially uses a small portion of the NAND as an SLC write buffer, which translates into improved write performance, as long as the buffer isn’t exhausted.
The TurboWrite buffer size dynamically adjusts based on the workload. With the 500GB model, for example, if the user’s dataset is under 4GB, TurboWrite uses the pre-allocated (default) TurboWrite region.
If it is more than 4GB, however, the 970 EVO can use an additional 18GB dynamic SLC buffer for a total of 22GB SLC buffer. Obviously, on the higher capacity drives, the buffer can be larger. The default and dynamic sizes of the buffers are defined in the chart above.
TurboWrite should allow the SSD 970 EVO series to perform very well in the vast majority of consumer-class workloads. As you can see in the screen-capture above (taken from HD Tune using a 1TB drive), writes are much faster when the TurboWrite buffer is being utilized, but once it is exhausted, write performance tapers and becomes more erratic.
Samsung warranties the SSD 970 Pro and 970 EVO series drives for 5 years, which is very good for a consumer-class SSD. All told, if you read all of that technical jibber-jabber, the Samsung SSD 970 Pro and 970 EVO should offer better endurance, thermals, and performance than their predecessors, in a similar package.
Let’s move on and find out…
Samsung 960 Evo 1TB vs Samsung 970 Evo NVMe M.2 2280 2TB: What is the difference?
Type of SSD drive.
SSD cache
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Samsung 960 Evo 1TB)
DRAM drive
Solid state drives/SSDs with DRAM flash memory use high-speed RAM as a buffer/cache. Performance is faster than non-DRAM SSDs that use slower NAND flash or system RAM (HMB).
This is an NVMe SSD
✔Samsung 960 Evo 1TB
✔Samsung 970 Evo NVMe M.2 2280 2TB
NVMe SSDs use the PCIe interface, which has a higher bandwidth than the SATA interface. This results in much faster read/write speeds compared to SSDs using the SATA interface.
built-in memory
1000GB
2000GB
Built-in memory is the built-in space for storing system data, applications, and user data in the device. With more internal storage, you can store more files and apps on your device.
Storage type SSD
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Samsung 960 Evo 1TB)
The storage type determines how many bits of data are written to each memory location. These storage types include SLC (one bit per cell), MLC (two bits per cell), and TLC (three bits per cell). The fewer bits written to each cell, the higher the speed and reliability.
PCI Express (PCIe) version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Samsung 960 Evo 1TB)
PCI Express (PCIe) is a high speed expansion card standard that is used to connect a computer to its peripherals. Newer versions support higher throughput and provide better performance.
Controller channels
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Samsung 960 Evo 1TB)
The controller is the processor that controls the functions of the SSD. The number of channels indicates the number of memory chips that this controller can access at the same time.
As a general rule, the more channels an SSD controller has, the better the performance.
Terabytes written (TBW)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Samsung 960 Evo 1TB)
Terabytes written (TBW) is a measure of the lifespan of an SSD and is often covered by the manufacturer’s warranty. A higher TBW may indicate greater reliability over a longer period of time.
MTBF
1.5million hours
1.5million hours
The MTBF is the manufacturer’s estimate of the average time a device can run before it fails.
Samsung 970 Evo SSD Review 250 GB to 1 TB
2018 Test Methodology
which was attended by SSD Samsung 960 Evo 1 TB. In the same place, we noted that for all the attractiveness of this family, it also has one serious drawback: only a three-year warranty. Even then it was known that in the new family of 970 Evo, this problem has been fixed, but at that time we had not yet been able to get acquainted with the novelty in practice.
Now such an opportunity has appeared, so we will not delay with its implementation.
Samsung V-NAND SSD 970 Evo 250 GB
Samsung V-NAND SSD 970 Evo 500 GB
Samsung V-NAND SSD 970 Evo 1 TB
The family has changed a lot: if for the 960 Evo there were only three years with a “mileage limit” of only 100 TB for every 250 GB of capacity, now we are talking about five years and 150 TB, respectively. It is clear that, in many ways, Samsung was forced to take this step, let’s say, by external circumstances: at the time the previous line appeared, the idea of a “fast SSD on TLC” was revolutionary in itself, and a three-year warranty was generally standard for TLC devices. Now, competitors have solved their problems with the production of 3D NAND, so they have “pulled themselves up” in terms of speed, and five-year warranties are increasingly being offered (regardless of the interface), so you have to match. Moreover, Samsung is striving to confirm its title of leader in the field of NAND flash, which has long mastered 3D NAND TLC and offers the market the next generation of it — on «cost-effective» 64-layer crystals of 256 Gbps.
Note that similar memory is also used in the already well-known 860 Evo line, but only in the younger modification, and 512 Gb crystals are used from 500 GB. Since line 970 Evo is positioned a level higher, it was decided not to save money: “large” crystals are used only in the 2 TB capacity modification. On the other hand, the company did not “strengthen” the junior modification of the line, although this was done not only in the 860 Pro, but also in the 960 Evo: there, 128 Gb crystals were used to build a 250 GB array, and in older models — the same 256 Gb, which is now. Thus, the younger model 970 Evo may turn out to be slower than the previous development, and even noticeably lag behind the older ones.
In addition, the size of the SLC cache, which is vital for TLC-memory drives, also depends on the full capacity. In the 970 Evo it is dynamic (as in the 960 Evo or 860 Evo): a small piece is allocated from the reserve pool of cells, to which, if possible, a part of the free pages of the main one is added.
The capacity of the dynamic part has not changed. it is 9 GB for every 250 GB of capacity. But the static part in the younger versions even decreased to 3 GB (it used to be 4 GB), remaining at the level of 6 GB only in the older versions of 1 and 2 TB. However, for model 970 Evo at 500 GB, this is not much of a problem: at full speed, this SSD can write more than 20 GB, which is enough for most practical scenarios, and only after that it will begin to “compress” data with a corresponding performance drop. With a capacity of 250 GB, the total cache capacity does not exceed 12 GB — more than many competitors (even larger capacities), but may not be enough in practice. We’ll check a little later.
For now, it remains to be said that the new line uses the new Phoenix controller, which is also used in top-end drives. However, this also applies to the previous development (Polaris), and in general the models are very similar — five-core eight-channel. True, as we have already written more than once, there is not much point in being strongly «attached» to Samsung controllers: the company’s products fully comply with Juche, so both controllers and memory are found only in combinations that Samsung seems to be optimal, and one under the other can be «customized» to a certain extent in the production process, not only at the software level.
Such vertical development is one of the reasons for Samsung’s success in the market, so any change in concept would be strange. They are not: in fact, the buyer gets the finished device, and the new line gradually replaces the old one. And even without changing the speed performance, the new line looks more advantageous — just progress in warranty terms is already enough. But the speed, however, we will check.
Competitors
Of course, we will compare the novelty with some other devices — both Samsung and other manufacturers. As for the former, we previously tested the 1TB 960 Evo and 512GB 960 Pro, and in some scenarios the former was faster, despite the formally lower positioning. Accordingly, it is interesting to see how the 970 Evo 1 TB looks against the background of this pair. But for comparison with the younger modifications of the new line, we can use a pair of Intel 760p drives of the same capacity, since these are devices of a similar class: comparable in price and with similar warranty conditions.
And the speed indicators in Intel 760p «pulled up» to a good level — in contrast to the rather indistinct Intel 600p, which had to compete with 960 Evo.
Testing
Testing procedure
The procedure is described in detail in separate article . There you can get acquainted with the hardware and software used.
Performance in applications
As usual, the high-level results of all participants are approximately equal — a budget SATA drive is almost never a bottleneck in the system, but we, nevertheless, today work with a higher class SSD. Now, if we remove the delays that occur due to the fault of other components of the system, something can already be compared. And it is clearly seen that it does not go beyond the limits of one’s class — 9The 60 Pro, even at its lowest capacity, remains the fastest Samsung drive we’ve tested. We did not test its successor in the face of the 970 Pro, but it is clear that it will work at least no slower.
However, if we consider only drives based on TLC memory, then the Evo line remains one of the fastest on the market, and the change of generations has only strengthened its position. In fact, if even the older 960 Evo has already begun to yield slightly to some of the newer developments of competitors, then even the younger 9The 70 Evo is already reaching a similar level. Older modifications are even faster. Again, in practice, it is still difficult to realize the potential performance of these devices, since application software is written based on much lower speeds. But a lot is not a little.
Sequential operations
The speed of sequential operations is something akin to the amount of memory on video cards: both make a certain contribution to the overall performance, but not at all a priority. However, many buyers pay attention to both, so manufacturers continue to compete in such parameters. And in this regard, one cannot fail to note a radical increase in reading speed compared to its predecessors — in fact, even 960 Pro does not shine compared to the new products.
But this is understandable — in comparison with many competing developments, he also stopped “shine”, which needed to be corrected. Moreover, it was not so difficult to do — after all, such scenarios practically do not depend on the type of memory, and the interface has a solid performance margin. The company took full advantage of all this when creating new controllers, used, in particular, in the 970 Evo.
But with recording, the situation is much more complicated — the native speed of TLC memory is still not that high. SLC caching comes to the rescue, but by increasing the working area to 16 GB in the test method, we are sometimes already able to “defeat” it. This is what is observed in the example of the younger modification — which, recall, can «accept» no more than 12 GB of data at full speed: this is the maximum capacity of the SLC cache in it (3 GB of the statistical part and about 9GB dynamic — if there is free space). But then you need to write directly to the flash memory array, which, with such a capacity, is also the slowest (compared to others), since it is impossible to evenly “load” all eight channels of the controller.
But compared to competing designs, it is not so slow, it should be noted, so the 250 GB 970 Evo turns out to be the slowest in the line, but one of the fastest NVMe SSDs on TLC memory of the same capacity. But if you increase it, the maximum cache size also increases — up to 21 GB (with a full 500 GB) or even up to 42 GB (in a terabyte drive). Accordingly, in these cases, we are actually testing only the cache. However, with such a capacity, it can be argued that in practical scenarios, all write operations will “fall” into it. Yes, and in the smallest 970 Evo, this will happen at least in half of the cases, or even more often — it is not often necessary to write down tens of gigabytes of information at once in a regular personal computer.
Random access
As expected, the read performance in the most parallelized mode depends almost linearly on the storage capacity, since all modifications use the same flash memory chips, but in different numbers. However, there is no particular superiority over the previous development, and in the «extra long» queue mode 970 Evo has become even slower. However, this is quite synthetic — at the moment, situations when some application manages to generate hundreds of commands in one thread are practically never found, not only in desktop systems. Why manufacturers do not optimize this scenario too much.
When writing, we once again observe the high efficiency of SLC caching in high-capacity models — which, in general, was also inherent in the 960 Evo. The smallest representative of the new line, as expected, does not show records, but «keeps» at a normal level for this market segment. Let this in itself not be too high.
Note that with “less degenerate” scenarios (and queues of 4-16 commands on one thread are much more realistic than 1×512 or 8×8), the picture is generally similar, but there are nuances: peak performance achievable in older modifications, lower, but the younger 970 Evo 250 GB lags behind them to a lesser extent. When compared with many competitors, it may turn out to be the fastest.
Curiously, when working with large block sizes, performance is inversely proportional to capacity. However, its absolute level is not bad, and the drives did not become worse than their predecessor. Even in theory — in practice, mass software, as has been said more than once, is still unable to «digest» such speeds, so for drives of this class this is rather a result «for the future».
Working with large files
The speed of sequential reading in the new family has increased, and this is noticeable not only in low-level utilities. And that’s good 🙂
The situation is a bit more complicated with recording, because there is not always enough capacity of the SLC cache. However, in this position, all devices of this class. And in it, the 970 Evo retains the title of «first among equals.»
Yes, the situation is similar with simultaneous write and read operations. And the most curious thing here is that terabyte 970 Evo began to work much faster than the representative of the previous line, similar in capacity, with pseudo-random access. In general, even in such scenarios, it is obvious that the 970 Evo is really a serious revision of the previous line, and not just new memory.
Ratings
The logical result: in terms of the speed of performing low-level operations, representatives of the 970 Evo line are able not only to overtake their immediate predecessors, but also to do so even with a smaller capacity. Yes, and with competitors (far from the weakest), this also often “rolls”. And given that the main problem of the previous family has been fixed (which was not related to technical issues at all), this makes all models 970 Evo is very attractive.
The same goes for the overall rating, where the 970 Evo 250 GB compares to many half-terabyte models, while the 500 GB model beats them all. 970 Evo 1 TB is not much faster, but with its capacity it doesn’t really matter anymore 🙂
Prices
The table shows the average retail prices of SSDs tested today, relevant at the time you read this article:
Total
In principle, we did not plan to make any discoveries: since 9The 70 Evo replaces the 960 Evo, the new models should be as good as the old ones.
The fact that they are better not only in terms of warranty, but also in terms of speed is just a nice addition. So far, there are few times when it is possible to dispose of such performance, but it definitely will not interfere. Especially if we talk about modifications of the 970 Evo with a capacity of 500 GB or more, which look great not only against the background of their immediate predecessors, but also in comparison with the more expensive drives of the 960 Pro family. However, this will not cause any “skew” in the Samsung assortment, since the series 9The 60 Pro is also being replaced by the 970 Pro, where the controller is the same as in the Evo, but the memory is faster and more enduring.
The 970 Evo 250 GB model, as expected, stands apart in the line — it is noticeably slower than older models. However, it is more correct to compare it not with them, but with other drives of the same capacity, including those with a SATA interface — and in such a comparison, this drive is almost always faster, competing on equal terms only with direct competitors from the NVMe segment (and even they are usually overtaken).