Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 vs Intel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake)
|
|
|
|
|
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 vs Intel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake)
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 on one side and Intel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake) on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2304 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,6 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, with 24 execution units, it includes 192 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,1 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Graphics card | Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 | Intel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake) | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Laptop | ||||||
| Release date | Q4 2018 | Q3 2019 | ||||||
| Model number | TU106-400A-A1 | — | ||||||
| GPU name | TU106 | Amber Lake GT2 | ||||||
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 9. 5 |
||||||
| Generation | GeForce 20 | Amber Lake Mobile | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | ||||||
| Bus interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 1,41 GHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1,62 GHz | 1,05 GHz | ||||||
| TDP | 175 W | 15 W | ||||||
| Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) | 36 | — | ||||||
| Execution units | — | 24 | ||||||
| Shading units (cuda cores) | 2. 304 |
192 | ||||||
| TMUs | 144 | 24 | ||||||
| ROPs | 64 | 3 | ||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB | — | ||||||
| Pixel fillrate | 103,7 GP/s | 3,2 GP/s | ||||||
| Texture fillrate | 233,3 GT/s | 25,2 GT/s | ||||||
| Performance FP16 (half) | 14,9 TFLOPS | 306,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Performance FP32 (float) | 7,5 TFLOPS | 403,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Performance FP64 (double) | 233,3 GFLOPS | 100,8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| FP32 Performance in GFLOPS | |
|---|---|
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 |
7.465 |
| Intel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake) |
403,2 |
The difference is 1751%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.
See also:
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Max-QNvidia GeForce RTX 2070 MobileNvidia GeForce RTX 2070 SuperNvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-QNvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Processors with the graphics card Intel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake):
Intel Core i3-10110YIntel Core i5-10210YIntel Core i7-10510Y
Equivalence:
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 AMD equivalentIntel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake) Nvidia equivalentIntel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake) AMD equivalent
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission.
Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
Intel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake) vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
|
|
|
|
|
Intel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake) vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Intel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake) on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, with 24 execution units, it has 192 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,1 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 2304 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,6 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake) | Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Laptop | Desktop | ||||||
| Release date | Q3 2019 | Q4 2018 | ||||||
| Model number | — | TU106-400A-A1 | ||||||
| GPU name | Amber Lake GT2 | TU106 | ||||||
| Architecture | Generation 9. 5 |
Turing | ||||||
| Generation | Amber Lake Mobile | GeForce 20 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm | ||||||
| Bus interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 300 MHz | 1,41 GHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1,05 GHz | 1,62 GHz | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 175 W | ||||||
| Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) | — | 36 | ||||||
| Execution units | 24 | — | ||||||
| Shading units (cuda cores) | 192 | 2. 304 |
||||||
| TMUs | 24 | 144 | ||||||
| ROPs | 3 | 64 | ||||||
| Cache memory | — | 4 MB | ||||||
| Pixel fillrate | 3,2 GP/s | 103,7 GP/s | ||||||
| Texture fillrate | 25,2 GT/s | 233,3 GT/s | ||||||
| Performance FP16 (half) | 306,4 GFLOPS | 14,9 TFLOPS | ||||||
| Performance FP32 (float) | 403,2 GFLOPS | 7,5 TFLOPS | ||||||
| Performance FP64 (double) | 100,8 GFLOPS | 233,3 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| FP32 Performance in GFLOPS | |
|---|---|
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 |
7.465 |
| Intel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake) |
403,2 |
The difference is 1751%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.
See also:
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Max-QNvidia GeForce RTX 2070 MobileNvidia GeForce RTX 2070 SuperNvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-QNvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Processors with the graphics card Intel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake):
Intel Core i3-10110YIntel Core i5-10210YIntel Core i7-10510Y
Equivalence:
Intel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake) Nvidia equivalentIntel UHD Graphics (Amber Lake) AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 2070 AMD equivalent
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission.
Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
Review of professional laptop Acer ConceptD 5 Pro
Assembling a desktop workstation for serious tasks such as professional video editing, 3D modeling, CAD is relatively easy — if only there was money, and the choice of components on the market is the widest. The situation is much worse with professional laptops.
There are not so many of them, and even ideally balanced models can be counted on one hand. A laptop is not a desktop, it is impossible to change an unsatisfactory screen or video card in it.
Acer, a company known to anyone who has ever been interested in laptops, in 2019 undertook a powerful and spectacular expansion into the market of computers for professionals. Their new line of ConceptD laptops was originally created with an eye on those involved in content production: photo, video, modeling, motion design, mathematical calculations and so on. The ConceptD combines a high-quality color screen with a powerful processor, professional graphics card, and an impressive amount of memory. And, importantly, everything is combined in a slim body with an elegant design. One of these seductive representatives of the line, Acer ConceptD 5 Pro, we will take a closer look.
11AX + Bluetooth 5.0, 2400 Mbps Acer Conceptd 5 Pro is a portable laptop in a 15.6-inch screen, an IPS-matrix with a 100%adobergba-flower space, a six-fucked processor and, the most unusual, the most unusual, video card of NVIDIA QUADRO RTX 3000. The latter is a little discouraging, because Quadro mobile professional accelerators were vanishingly rare in laptop computers, and now they have become the basis of the well-known brand’s laptop line.
First of all, I would like to talk about NVIDIA Quadro. There are a lot of myths around these video cards in the professional community. Someone is sure that Quadro was created to speed up the rendering of scenes in 3dsMax, someone considers it an advantage for fast rendering of models in the viewport of 3D editors, beginners even believe that Quadro renders video much faster in Adobe After Effects.
The other camp consists of skeptics who claim that in professional applications between Quadro and GeForce there has been no difference for a long time, except for the difference in price, which is explained only by the impudence of the manufacturer.
The truth, as usual, lies somewhere in between. Indeed, professional NVIDIA Quadro video cards are built on absolutely the same chips as gaming NVIDIA GeForce, from an architectural point of view, there are no differences between them. Unless there is usually more video memory in Quadro — if 8 GB is more than enough for games, then in principle there is no upper limit for training a neural network or working with calculations, so Quadro can have both 24 and 48 GB.
Is there a difference in rendering speed between Quadro and GeForce? Yes and no. For popular tasks like working with video in Adobe Premiere or rendering V-Ray, GeForce can be even faster. NVIDIA claims to support Quadro more than Adobe Photoshop Lightroom, Unreal Engine and Autodesk MAYA, but in fact the advantage over GeForce in speed is observed only in a few specific tasks: in SolidWorks or CATIA NVIDIA Quadro is faster than GeForce with a similar chip by about 1.
5 times. The Siemens NX CAD package stands apart, in which the Quadro breaks forward 25-30 times.
Why, then, do NVIDIA Quadro graphics cards even exist if their price does not justify the potential advantages over affordable gaming adapters? The thing is that if GeForce is sharpened for maximum performance, then Quadro is for maximum accuracy and reliability of calculations. Professional cards operate with error correction memory and have better double precision calculations. In addition, Quadros work under the control of a special RTX STUDIO driver, which was specially developed to improve the stability of work with professional software. Many of the benefits of the Quadro are driven by the drivers, but with the ability to switch between creative and gaming drivers, the Quadro can be quickly turned into a gaming graphics card. There is still a difference between Quadro and GeForce due to the driver — in the same Blender, the viewport is drawn much faster on Quadro, although there are no architectural explanations for this fact.
But let’s get back to the laptop itself. Acer calls the design of the ConceptD 5 Pro classic, as they say, «timeless», but in fact it has modern trends, such as beveled edges. The body is made of anodized aluminium. Of the plastic elements, there is only a frame around the display and the inevitable thin strip on the lid, under which the Wi-Fi antenna is installed. The case is assembled very tightly, not a hint of squeaks when pressed. In general, the laptop gives the impression of a strong and hardy machine that will withstand constant carrying in a backpack for several years.
The «professionalism» of a laptop is determined not only by its filling, but also by connectors for connecting peripherals. And here everything is not so clear. Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI 2.0, two full-size USB-A 3.1 and USB-C 3.1 Gen 1 are wired on the left side with the ability to connect an external display to it.
On the right side there is a combo audio jack, a regular USB 2.0 (probably for connecting a wireless mouse receiver), operation and battery indicators, and a power connector.
And now the riddle: what connectors does the ConceptD 5 Pro lack in order to fully live up to the title of a professional tool? The same thing that, for example, the owners of the new MacBook Pro are deprived of — an SD card slot! Photographers are indignant and carry external readers or a cable to connect the camera to a computer.
The back end of the notebook looks militant and even somewhat reminiscent of gaming models. Behind the ventilation grill, which occupies the entire rear side, a large radiator is visible — we will talk about cooling a little later.
The keyboard is a pleasant surprise, that’s where Acer really thought first of all about ergonomics, not beauty. Before us is a modern fifteen-inch laptop with a full-size layout with a number pad!
The keys are pleasantly quiet and backlit in atypical amber color. If you think logically, yellow is better than cool white — when working in the dark, it is less distracting and irritating to the eyes.
The large touchpad, slightly shifted to the left, is made in a modern buttonless way — its entire surface is pressed. In general, the touchpad cannot be considered a more or less serious working tool, it is only useful for quickly looking at something on the computer on the road, while a mouse is needed for daily use.
The screen is the real pride of the notebook. The AU Optronics AUO31EB 15.6-inch 4K (3840×2160) Matte IPS IPS panel is Pantone Validated, according to Acer, which means that all colors from the Pantone Matching System used in printing are correctly and accurately displayed on the screen. This fact alone is worth a lot, making the ConceptD 5 Pro a very interesting laptop for printing and publishing.
An even more impressive feature is the display of 100% of the AdobeRGB color space, which is vastly superior to sRGB. Moreover, with an accuracy of Delta E <2. This should impress photographers and video editors. Every ConceptD 5 Pro is calibrated at the factory, but if you have a good calibrator, you can fine-tune your sensor colors to perfection.
Finally, a huge plus is the matte anti-glare coating, the grain of which does not distort the high-density 4K picture at all. Acer chose a really successful and promising matrix.
To better understand the marvel of layout inside the Acer ConceptD 5 Pro, let’s take a look inside. An absolutely stunning picture opens up under the metal cover. First, it is a massive CPU and GPU cooling system, consisting of three long heat pipes and two different fans of the AeroBlade 3D system. The blades of one of these fans are metal and very thin — only 0.1 mm. Less thickness, more blades on the impeller, higher airflow. Acer claims that the cooling system is configured so that at any given time, the fan noise does not exceed 40 dBA at a distance of 30 cm from the laptop, regardless of whether the laptop is under load or not.
Secondly, the layout is amazing, in which there was space for both a 2 TB hard drive and two incredibly fast 512 GB NVMe-SSDs combined into a RAID 0 array.
Two RAM slots are already occupied by 16 GB sticks, which is more than enough for many tasks, but the fact that they are easy to replace is pleasing — you need a regular Phillips screwdriver to remove the cover.
Thirdly, the 3574 mAh (55 Wh) battery is not as small as you might think. Of course, when Quadro works instead of the built-in video adapter, the ConceptD 5 Pro will work only one and a half to two hours, but in economy mode, for example, when watching a movie or working with text, you can count on 5 hours.
Fourth, the presence of the Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 module with support for the 802.11ax standard is surprising, the popularization of which should be expected only in a few years.
The performance of the Acer ConceptD 5 Pro is as expected, both due to a graphics card equivalent in power to the mobile GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and a six-core Intel Core i7-9750H processor. And since we are talking about a professional machine, not the most traditional benchmarks were used, but tests that could reveal the capabilities of a working, not a gaming computer.
Summary
Pro
- Aluminum body, good build quality
- Ergonomic keyboard
- High performance
- Screen. AU Optronics AUO31EB 15.6″ 4K (3840×2160) IPS Matte Panel
Vs
- No SD Card Slot
Octane | Render.ru
Michael Gilichinski
Site Member
#1
#1
Friends, good afternoon. The question is this: I’m completely new to rendering. But for 13 years I have been working in CAD and specifically RHINOCEROS and before that Solidworks. I work on a jewelry theme, I have my own studio and a small production.
Now, while quarantine, I’m learning Blue and Octane for cool renders in the jewelry theme. It has its own specifics (clozaps, metal and many reflections, realism of stones. A lot of post-processing in Photoshop).
Question: I’m thinking about a new computer. I will render mostly stills (if there are animations, I will send them to farms).
I read that RTX 2070 cards have an ideal performance / price ratio.
Tell me, can they be put, for example, 4 pieces in one computer?
And what accessories are needed for such a connection?
Thank you in advance for your answers))
Happy holiday to all))
Ylana
Expert
#2
#2
Happy Holidays!!!!
Check out:
https://www.
pugetsystems.com/labs/a…uY3l5cBHAD9tdIzg6fSJqUcRDIqRM24Q8SOh6Fovfa9aA
Michael Gilichinski
Site Member
#3
#3
Got it… Not in the budget, unfortunately, at the moment.
I can pay $1500 for a computer (without peripherals).
What can be done for such money? I mean a machine for GPU rendering.
Thank you
Ylana
Expert
#4
#4
Michael Gilichinski said:
Tell me, is it possible to put, for example, 4 pieces in one computer?
Click to expand.
..
Of course!
Motherboards are enough for this, and you can find processors that support this without any problems.
But even this will not fit into your budget (1500$)
Michael Gilichinski
Site Member
#5
#5
Thank you. Well, then I’ll buy 3 cards for now. Or even 2.
and can you advise the best components for this? So that the video card would not slow down anything.
Thank you)
Ylana
Expert
#6
#6
Michael Gilichinski said:
Well, I’ll buy 3 cards for now.
Or even 2.
Click to expand…
Well, you don’t have a budget for them if you look at how much the RTX 2070 costs (…I read that the RTX 2070 cards have an ideal price / performance ratio….)
Michael Gilichinski said:
Found…
Click to expand…
But, probably not carefully. Below the article there is a link to recommended assemblies both on two video adapters and on 4.
There you can also choose components and immediately see how much it will cost.
mageaster
Master
mageaster
Master
Michael Gilichinski
Site Member
#9
#9
mageaster said:
Yes, you need a motherboard with four PCI-E x16 slots. But the problem is that only the powers of GPUs are summed up, the memory remains equal to the memory of one card, i.e. 8 gigs. Memory stacking requires RTX 2080Ti/Titan/Quadro + NVLink.
Click to expand…
Got it.
Thank you.
Well, then a question. I need to render simple jewelry scenes. So far no animation. Styles only. BUT these are clozaps, complex light and all that. Those. for animation I can use render farms.
So, let’s say 2 2060 SUPER cards, line-connected (that’s what it seems to be called) are suitable for this?
Thanks in advance)
mageaster
Master
#10
#10
Michael Gilichinski said:
BUT it’s closaps and complex lights and all.
Click to expand…
Complex light is when there are several (dozens) light sources in the scene, many of which are hidden from the camera behind an obstacle.
And closeups usually have standard studio direct and / or indirect lighting from fixtures located next to the camera. For rendering, this is nothing at all. Complex shading (diamond dispersion, amber volumetrics) is another matter.
Michael Gilichinski said:
So let’s say 2 2060 SUPER cards in-line (that’s what it’s called) would work for this?
Click to expand…
One regular 6-gig 2060 may work, depending on specific conditions. Let’s say I have one large residential area in Blender (Cycles) with several million polygons, but with only HDRI lighting and almost the same simple materials, it renders in a minute and a little and is absolutely clean, and a small interior is a couple of million polygons with a lot of stuff. glass, sss, light from windows and a couple of lamps in the room, rendered for 40 minutes and very noisy. The resolution is about the same.
Elnur Jin (Elnur)
Site user
#11
#11
mageaster said:
Yes, you need a motherboard with four PCI-E x16 slots.