AMD Athlon 64 3300+ vs AMD Athlon XP 1900+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 3300+ and AMD Athlon XP 1900+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark.
AMD Athlon 64 3300+
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD Athlon XP 1900+
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 3300+
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 734 vs 312
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 576 vs 203
| Launch date | April 2004 vs January 2001 |
| Maximum frequency | 2. |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 734 vs 312 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 576 vs 203 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 1900+
- Around 68% lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 89 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 89 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 3300+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 1900+
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Athlon 64 3300+ | AMD Athlon XP 1900+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 734 | 312 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 576 | 203 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon 64 3300+ | AMD Athlon XP 1900+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | NewCastle | Thoroughbred |
| Launch date | April 2004 | January 2001 |
| Place in performance rating | 2029 | 2643 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 144 mm | 80 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2. 4 GHz |
1.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 105 million | 37 million |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 754 | A |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt | 53 Watt |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Athlon 64 3300+ with others
AMD
Athlon 64 3300+
vs
AMD
Phenom II X4 910
AMD
Athlon 64 3300+
vs
AMD
Athlon II X3 425
AMD
Athlon 64 3300+
vs
Intel
Core i5-2400S
AMD
Athlon 64 3300+
vs
Intel
Pentium G645
AMD
Athlon 64 3300+
vs
Intel
Pentium G2030
AMD
Athlon 64 3300+
vs
AMD
Athlon X4 530
AMD Sempron 3300+ vs AMD Athlon XP 2700+
Comparative analysis of AMD Sempron 3300+ and AMD Athlon XP 2700+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark.
AMD Sempron 3300+
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD Athlon XP 2700+
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3300+
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 90 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 68 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 315 vs 256
| Launch date | April 2005 vs October 2002 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 130 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt vs 68 Watt |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 315 vs 256 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 2700+
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 2.
17 GHz vs 2 GHz - Around 1% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 398 vs 394
| Maximum frequency | 2.17 GHz vs 2 GHz |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 398 vs 394 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Sempron 3300+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 2700+
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Sempron 3300+ | AMD Athlon XP 2700+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 394 | 398 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 315 | 256 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Sempron 3300+ | AMD Athlon XP 2700+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Palermo | Thoroughbred |
| Launch date | April 2005 | October 2002 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | $85 |
| Place in performance rating | 2551 | 2552 |
| Price now | $60 | $84. 79 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.37 | 1.36 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 84 mm | 80 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2 GHz | 2. 17 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 63 million | 37 million |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 754 | A |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | 68 Watt |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Sempron 3300+ with others
AMD
Sempron 3300+
vs
AMD
Athlon XP 3000+
AMD
Sempron 3300+
vs
AMD
Athlon XP 2700+
AMD
Sempron 3300+
vs
AMD
Sempron 3100+
AMD
Sempron 3300+
vs
Intel
Core 2 Duo E7200
AMD
Sempron 3300+
vs
Intel
Atom D425
AMD
Sempron 3300+
vs
Intel
Celeron J1900
AMD Ryzen 3 3300 vs AMD Athlon XP 2700+
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 3 3300 and AMD Athlon XP 2700+ processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark.
AMD Ryzen 3 3300
versus
AMD Athlon XP 2700+
Advantages
reasons to select AMD RYZEN 3 3300
- Release processor, Release DIALS 16 YEAR (S)
- Processor unlocked, Impolocated multiplier allows you to easily allowe overclock
- 5 more cores, the ability to run more applications simultaneously: 6 vs 1
- Approximately 84% more clock speed: 4 GHz vs 2.17 GHz
- power consumption: 7 nm vs 130 nm
- L1 cache is 4.5 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L2 cache is 12 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Approximately 36% less power consumption: 50 Watt vs 68 Watt
| Release date | March 2019 vs October 2002 |
| Unlocked | Unlocked / Locked |
| Number of cores | 6 vs 1 |
| Maximum frequency | 4 GHz vs 2. 17 GHz |
| Process | 7 nm vs 130 nm |
| Level 1 cache | 96K (per core) vs 128KB |
| Level 2 cache | 512K (per core) vs 256KB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 68 Watt |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 3300
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 2700+
| Name | AMD Ryzen 3 3300 | AMD Athlon XP 2700+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 398 | |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 256 |
Performance comparison
| AMD Ryzen 3 3300 | AMD Athlon XP 2700+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Zen 2 | Thoroughbred |
| Issue date | March 2019 | October 2002 |
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2552 |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price at the date of first issue | $85 | |
| Price now | $84. 79 |
|
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 1.36 | |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.2 GHz | |
| Level 1 cache | 96K (per core) | 128KB |
| Level 2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256KB |
| Level 3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | |
| Process | 7 nm | 130nm |
| Maximum frequency | 4GHz | 2. 17 GHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 1 |
| Number of threads | 12 | |
| Number of transistors | 4800 million | 37 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| Crystal area | 80mm | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | |
| Maximum number of processors in | 1 | 1 |
| Supported sockets | AM4 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 68 Watt |
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |
Navigation
Select processor
Processor comparison
AMD Ryzen 3 3300 vs other processors
AMD
Ryzen 3 3300
versus
AMD
Ryzen 5 3600X
AMD
Ryzen 3 3300
versus
AMD
Ryzen 5 3600
AMD
Ryzen 3 3300
versus
AMD
Ryzen 3 3300X
Comparison of AMD Sempron 3300+ and AMD Athlon XP 2700+
Comparative analysis of AMD Sempron 3300+ and AMD Athlon XP 2700+ processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Compatibility._DMT3C_02.jpg)
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark.
AMD Sempron 3300+
versus
AMD Athlon XP 2700+
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD Sempron 3300+
- Newer processor, release date difference 2 year(s) 6 month(s) Newer manufacturing process allows
- About 10% less power consumption: 62 Watt vs 68 Watt
- Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 23% better: 315 vs 256
newer manufacturing process make it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 90 nm vs 130 nm
| Release date | April 2005 vs October 2002 |
| Process | 90 nm vs 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt vs 68 Watt |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 315 vs 256 |
Reasons to choose AMD Athlon XP 2700+
- About 9% more clock speed: 2.
17 GHz vs 2 GHz - PassMark — Single thread mark performance about 1% more: 398 vs 39037
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD Sempron 3300+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 2700+
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
| Name | AMD Sempron 3300+ | AMD Athlon XP 2700+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 394 | 398 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 315 | 256 |
Performance comparison
| AMD Sempron 3300+ | AMD Athlon XP 2700+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Palermo | Thoroughbred |
| Issue date | October 2002 | |
| Price at first issue date | $30 | $85 |
| Place in the ranking | 2551 | 2552 |
| Price now | $60 | $84. 79 |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 2.37 | 1.36 |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Crystal area | 84mm | 80mm |
| Level 1 cache | 128KB | 128KB |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB | 256KB |
| Process | 90nm | 130nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2 GHz | 2.
|