Intel Celeron 430 vs Intel Pentium D 805. Which is the Best?
X
This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. Please be advised that the operator of this site accepts advertising compensation from certain companies that appear on the site, and such compensation impacts the location and order in which the companies (and/or their products) are presented, and in some cases may also impact the scoring that is assigned to them. The scoring that appears on this site is determined by the site operator in its sole discretion, and should NOT be relied upon for accuracy purposes. In fact, Company/product listings on this page DO NOT imply endorsement by the site operator. Except as expressly set forth in our Terms of Use, all representations and warranties regarding the information presented on this page are disclaimed. The information which appears on this site is subject to change at any time.
More info
General Specifications
Brand
Intel
Intel
Model
Celeron 430
Pentium D 805
Origin
Costa Rica
Malaysia
About the Product
The Intel Celeron 430 is a desktop processor with an excellent balance between processing power and reliability. It has 1 core and 1 thread and clock frequency is 1.8GHz. This processor is compatible with LGA775 socket. L2 cache size is 512KB. It is a good solution for home and office use.
Intel Pentium D 805 is Smithfield architecture desktop processor. It has 2 cores and 2 threads and is manufactured using a 90 nm process technology. This processor is compatible with the PLGA775 socket with a TDP of 95W. The clock frequency is 2.66GHz. L2 cache size is 2MB.
Package Size
Height
5.5 in.
6.2 in.
Depth
3 in.
3.2 in.
Weight
1.1 lbs.
1.1 lbs.
Width
5.
07 in.
-
Height
-
Depth
Intel Celeron 430
Intel Pentium D 805
Intel Celeron 430
Intel Pentium D 805
Details
Socket
LGA775
PLGA775
Lithography
65 nm
90 nm
Type of Processors
Desktop
Desktop
Code Name
Conroe
Smithfield
What customers say about «Details»
Intel Celeron 430 CPU Processor
- Installed it quickly. Works right out the box.
- Nice and cheap processor, installation took less than 10 minutes.
- I have known this socket 775 for a long time. So I installed it quickly.
- Processor for old socket 775. It is difficult to find a suitable motherboard for it.
- Lithography 65 nm in modern times is a lot. It can be seen that the processor is old.
Intel Pentium D 805 CPU Processor
- If you have a 775 motherboard and it accepts pentium d processors get this.
- The socket is understandable enough for everyone.
Secured well. - Always loved Intel chips. Easy installation.
- I bought this processor, installed it easily. I’m really happy.
- You may find it difficult to find a motherboard for this processor.
Technical Specifications
CPU Cores
CPU Threads
Clock Speed
1.8 GHz
2.66 GHz
Max TDP
35 W
95 W
Max Temperature
60.4 °C
64.1 °C
Data Width
64 bits
64 bits
Virtualization Technology
-
CPU Cores
-
CPU Threads
-
Max TDP
-
Max Temperature
-
Virtualization Technology
-
Data Width
Intel Celeron 430
Intel Pentium D 805
Intel Celeron 430
Intel Pentium D 805
Intel Celeron 430
Intel Pentium D 805
Intel Celeron 430
Intel Pentium D 805
Intel Celeron 430
Intel Pentium D 805
What customers say about «Technical Specifications»
Intel Celeron 430 CPU Processor
- Solid low power processor.
I work easily with many applications. - Cheap and cool CPU. I listen to music, watch movies, and even run a few games.
- An excellent processor for simple tasks. I have been using it for 8 years already, I am satisfied.
- This is a weak processor, which is more suitable for office and browsing.
- If you want to run modern games, then look for a different processor.
Intel Pentium D 805 CPU Processor
- It is a cheap processor but has good speed.
I recommend this. - This processor with a good fan can be cranked up to 4Ghz or more easily.
- This processor is one of the best for overclocking, speed, power, multi-processing on the market period.
- A good and efficient processor that can be overclocked.
- This processor lacks Virtualization Technology. Please understand that this is an old chip.
Cache And Memory Specifications
L1 Cache Size
64 kB
32 kB
L2 Cache Size
512 kB
2000 kB
Max Memory Size
16 GB
16 GB
Memory Types
DDR3
DDR2
Max Memory Channels
Max Memory Bandwidth
8.
5 GB/s
8.5 GB/s
-
L1 Cache Size
-
Max Memory Channels
Intel Celeron 430
Intel Pentium D 805
Intel Celeron 430
Intel Pentium D 805
What customers say about «Cache And Memory Specifications»
Intel Celeron 430 CPU Processor
- With 2GB of RAM, this processor works great. I run everything I need.
- Cheap and reliable processor.
With DDR2 it works without lags. - An excellent processor for all my tasks. The cache size is enough, everything is stable.
- This processor has little cache. I don’t understand why they didn’t do more.
- The disadvantage of this processor is a really small cache and there is no L3 cache.
Intel Pentium D 805 CPU Processor
- Install DDR2 800 memory with this processor and have a fast system.
- This CPU runs DDR2 667 and I’m happy with the speed.
A good product. - I am enjoying this processor. Works stably with 2GB of RAM.
- Cheap and reliable CPU, works well with my RAM.
- This Pentium D 805 has a small cache size.
Supported Technologies
Execute Disable Bit / Virus Protection
Yes
Yes
Turbo Boost / Turbo Core
Enhanced SpeedStep / PowerNow!
Hyper-Threading / HyperTransport
-
Execute Disable Bit / Virus Protection
-
Enhanced SpeedStep / PowerNow!
-
Hyper-Threading / HyperTransport
Warranty / Certifications
Manufacturer Warranty
3 year(s)
3 year(s)
Certifications
CE, FCC
CE, FCC
Other Information
Manufacturer
Link
Link
Popular Comparisons
Other reviews
Best Gaming CPUs
Best CPUs
Best NVMe SSD
Best 140mm Case Fans
Best Graphics Cards
Best Sound Cards
Best USB Sound Cards
Best Tempered Glass PC Cases
Best RGB Fans
Best DDR4 RAM Kits to Upgrade Your PC
Best Gaming Graphics Cards
Best Computer Power Supplies
What Is the Difference Between a Pentium and a Celeron Processor?
«»
Do you know how to identify one processor from another? Xia yuan/Getty Images
Two of Intel’s most popular microprocessors are the Pentium and Celeron.
Here are the similarities and the differences:
- Core: Both processors share the same basic dual-core architecture, with Celeron being the entry-level chip, and Pentium slotted above it. Both also have built-in graphics and support up to 128 GBs of RAM (computer memory).
- Cache: The 2021 lines of both the Celeron and Pentium commonly have between two and four megabytes of cache memory (cache memory is where frequently used data is stored).
- Clock speed: The 2021 Celeron line has options up to 3.6 GHz of clock speed, while Pentiums rank marginally faster, up to 4.3 GHz. Clock speed measures how fast a CPU can process data.
- Bus speed: Both now also have very similar bus speeds with up to eight gigatransfers per second. (A bus is a circuit that connects one part of the motherboard to another. The more data a bus can handle at once, the faster it allows information to travel). Each processor can handle file transfers from things like USB drives quickly and effectively.
The main advantage Pentiums have over Celerons in 2021 is a feature called «hyper-threading.» This function allows the operating system to virtually «split» each processor core in two. So, a dual-core Pentium can effectively perform similarly to a quad-core. The manufacturer states that hyper-threading can boost computing speeds up to 30 percent higher during CPU-intensive tasks.
Advertisement
The Pentium used to be Intel’s high-grade processor, but it has since been replaced by the Core series, knocking it down to a mid-tier product. The Core line is intended for businesses and entrepreneurs and comes with all-around better stats. They have similar clock speeds to the Pentium chips but aren’t capped at two CPU cores. In fact, the top of the line comes with a whopping 18 cores, making it several times faster than the cheaper lines.
Core processors also have many more megabytes of cache memory, but the same bus speed as Intel’s other options. Additionally, they gain a «turbo boost» function, which allows the CPU to overclock itself automatically for short periods.
Hyper-threading is also enabled, making the multi-core performance even more impressive. This speed does come at a price, with the most expensive Core units retailing at over $500, while a Celeron processor might cost under $100 and Pentium roughly between $100 and $200.
Celerons often come pre-installed in budget-conscience laptops, tablets and other compact smart devices. They’re just fine for that purpose, but for multitasking on a PC, the hyper-threading feature available on Pentiums will probably come in handy. If you regularly use resource-heavy programs like Photoshop, media production suites or modern 3-D games, you should opt for a multi-core CPU such as Intel’s Core processor or AMD Ryzen.
Advertisement
Intel Celeron Processor FAQ
Is an Intel Celeron processor good?
Celeron processors offer good value for their money as they are based on four Pentium cores, but with less cache memory. They can be particularly useful if you use Windows 8.
1 or 7. If you’re looking for a budget-friendly deal, Celeron processors are the right choice for small business and personal use.
Which is better: Intel Core or Pentium?
Intel is known to equip their Core brand with more powerful processors compared to the equivalent Celeron or Pentium models, even though they often use the same basic processor technology.
Which Intel Core is the best?
The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X with DirectX 12.00 takes the lead over Intel Core i9-10900K Processors with a 3DMark Physics score of 14133.
Is Core i3 better than Celeron?
Celeron and Core i3 both have the same number of cores. However, Core i3 has a 18GHz clock speed while Celeron has 1.1GHz making Core i3 the better choice.
Can I replace Celeron with i5?
You cannot replace your Celeron with i5 because Celerons belong to the LGA775 socket family while i5 technology is based on 1156 socket. Therefore, upgradation isn’t possible.
Related Articles
Cite This!
Please copy/paste the following text to properly cite this HowStuffWorks.com article:
Talon Homer
«What Is the Difference Between a Pentium and a Celeron Processor?»
1 April 2000.
HowStuffWorks.com. <https://computer.howstuffworks.com/what-is-the-difference-between-a-pentium-and-a-celeron-processor.htm>
26 July 2023
Citation
Comparison of Intel Celeron D 326 and Intel Pentium III 1400
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron D 326 and Intel Pentium III 1400 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark.
Intel Celeron D 326
versus
Intel Pentium III 1400
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Celeron D 326
- Newer processor, release date difference 2 year(s) 9 month(s) 90 020
- Approximately 81% higher clock speed: 2.
53 GHz vs 1.4 GHz - A newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 90 nm vs 130 nm
- The L1 cache is 2 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
| Release date | September 2004 vs December 2001 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.53 GHz vs 1.4 GHz |
| Process | 90 nm vs 130 nm |
| Level 1 cache | 16KB vs 8KB |
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium III 1400
- About 2% more maximum core temperature: 69°C vs 67.7°C
- 2.7 times less power consumption: 31.2 Watt vs 84 Watt
90 027
| Maximum temperature kernels | 69°C vs 67. 7°C |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31.2 Watt vs 84 Watt |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Celeron D 326
CPU 2: Intel Pentium III 1400
| Name | Intel Celeron D 326 | Intel Pentium III 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 272 | |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 193 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Celeron D 326 | Intel Pentium III 1400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Prescott | Tualatin |
| Production date | September 2004 | December 2001 |
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 3056 |
| Processor Number | 326 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2. 53 GHz |
1.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 533 MHz FSB | 133 MHz FSB |
| Crystal area | 112 mm2 | 80 mm2 |
| Level 1 cache | 16KB | 8KB |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB | 256KB |
| Process | 90nm | 130nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 67.7°C | 69°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2. 53 GHz |
1.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Number of transistors | 125 million | 44 million |
| Permissible core voltage | 1.250V-1.400V | 1.5V |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 69 °C | |
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm |
|
| Supported sockets | PLGA775, PLGA478 | PPGA370 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 31.2 Watt |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Parity FSB | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 32-bit | |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |
Comparison of Intel Celeron D 331 vs Intel Pentium 4 2.
4A
| Intel Celeron D 331 | Intel Pentium 4 2.4A |
|---|---|
| Two models from intel | |
| Two CPU models belong to the desktop type | |
| Both CPUs have the same system bus speed 533 MHz FSB | |
| 90 190 CPUs contain 1 core | |
| The manufacturing process of the two processor models is 90 nanometers | |
| Both processor models have the same number of transistors: 125 million | |
| Intel Celeron D 331 | Intel Pentium 4 2.4A | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Celeron D 331 belongs to the Celeron | processor family Pentium 4 2. 4A belongs to the family of processors Pentium |
||
| Processor core architecture Celeron D 331 is called Prescott-256 | Pentium 4 2.4A core architecture is called Prescott | ||
| Intel Celeron D 331 runs on socket LGA775 | Intel Pentium 4 2.4A runs on Socket 478 | ||
| Celeron D 331 is much inferior in terms of number of threads, 1 vs. 2 | Pentium 4 2.4A is much superior in terms of number of threads, 2 vs. 1 | ||
| Celeron D 331 slightly outperforms in terms of frequency, 2667 MHz compared to 2400 MHz | Pentium 4 2.4A slightly loses in terms of frequency, 2400 MHz vs. 2667 MHz | ||
| Celeron D 331 slightly better in terms of thermal dissipation, its TDP is slightly lower than that of the competitor and is equal to 84 W | 0030 | Celeron D 331 has a maximum temperature limit of 67. 7 degrees Celsius. Not much inferior to Pentium 4 2.4A |
.4 °C |
| The L1 cache of the Celeron D 331 processor is much smaller compared to the Pentium 4 2.4A and equals 16 KB | The L1 cache of the Pentium 4 2.4A processor is much larger than that of the Celeron D 331 and equals 28 KB | ||
| The L2 cache of the Celeron D 331 processor is much smaller than that of the Pentium 4 2.4A and is 256 Kilobytes | The L2 cache of the Pentium 4 2.4A CPU is much larger compared to the Celeron D 33 1 and equals 1024 Kilobyte |
Comparison of instructions and technologies
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Celeron D 331 | Intel Pentium 4 2.4A | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stop Grant state | Energy saving status. |
||
| Sleep state | — | Sleep state. | |
| AutoHalt state | Automatic stop status. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Celeron D 331 | Intel Pentium 4 2.4A | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | Multimedia extensions. | ||
| SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | Streaming SIMD processor extension. | ||
| SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 2. | ||
| SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 3. |
||
| EM64T (Extended Memory 64-bit Technology) | — | 64-bit extended memory technology. | |
| NX (Execute disable bit) | — | Execution inhibit bit. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Celeron D 331 | Intel Pentium 4 2.4A | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyper-Threading | — | Hyperthreading technology. | |
| SMM (System Management mode) | — | System control mode. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The rating can be calculated by the formula, taking into account all the data, such as — test results of all benchmarks, temperature data, instructions, socket, frequency, auto-overclocking technologies, release year, number of cores, threads , architecture, and more.
The results of the overall rating showed that the Celeron D 331 processor is not much superior to its rival Pentium 4 2.4A. The Pentium 4 2.4A processor itself was able to score 179.35 points, slightly behind the competitor.
PassMark CPU Mark
This is perhaps the most popular benchmark tester in RuNet. It includes a wide range of tests for a comprehensive assessment of PC performance, including CPU. Among them are extended instruction checking, integer calculations, floating point calculations, compression, game physics calculations, encryption, single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. It is also possible to compare the received data with the rest of the configurations in the database. All CPUs presented on our website have passed PassMark tests. The Performance Test showed a slightly higher performance of the Celeron D 331 processor (182 points) over the Pentium 4 2.4A (151 points). The Pentium 4 2.4A falls slightly behind in this test.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
It is possible to test multi-processor systems.
The ray tracing method is used. The test is run under Windows, Mac OS X operating systems. Single-Thread uses only one thread for rendering and one core in its work. This benchmark for testing processors and video cards is obsolete by now. Released by MAXON, and based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D. The basic performance testing mode is a photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, multilevel reflections, working with light, simulated global illumination, spatial lights, and procedural shaders.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Thread is another way to test in Cinebench R10, which already uses multi-thread and multi-core test mode. It should be noted that the possible number of threads in this version of the program is limited to sixteen.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi-threaded version of the CINEBENCH R11.5 test — which has the ability to test the CPU at 100 percent using all cores and threads. It differs from previous versions, 64 threads are already supported here.
Testing the Pentium 4 2.4A in the Cinebench 11.5 benchmark showed a result of 0.24 points, slightly outperforming its competitor. At this time, Celeron D 331 gets its 0.21 points, which fully justifies their close positions in the rating.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Good old multifunctional Cinebench version R11.5 from Maxon. The checks still use the ray tracing process, rendering a detailed 3D room with lots of crystalline and translucent and glass spheres. In this Single-Core variant, tests are performed using one core and one thread. His tests to this day have not lost their relevance. The result of the check is the value «frames per second». Testing in single-threaded mode of the Pentium 4 2.4A processor in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed that with a score of 0.24 points, it is not far ahead of the competitor. But the Celeron D 331 itself scored 0.21 points in this test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi Core version of Cinebench R15 will load your system to the fullest, demonstrating everything it can.
All CPU cores and threads are involved when rendering highly detailed 3D objects. Cinebench R15 is ideal for the new multi-threaded CPUs from Intel and AMD, as it is capable of using 256 computation threads. The Pentium 4 2.4A with a score of 20.99 does not win much in the multi-threaded Cinebench r15 benchmark. Slightly behind it is the Celeron D 331 gaining 18.99 points.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench Release 15 is the most up-to-date benchmark from Finns from Maxon. A complex 3D scene is rendered with a large number of light sources, objects and reflections. It tests the entire system: both CPU and video cards. For the CPU, the result of the analysis will be the number of PTS points, and for video controllers, the number of frames per second FPS. In this version of Single Core, 1 thread is used for rendering. The single-threaded test of the Pentium 4 2.4A processor in the Cinebench R15 program showed a result of 20.88 points, slightly ahead of the competitor.
Having received 19With .04 points in this test, the Celeron D 331 is not far behind.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded benchmark
Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-threaded benchmark. Its broad OS and device support makes Geekbench benchmarks the most valuable to date. It’s Already In Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core Pentium 4 2.4A received 491.63 points, which is slightly higher than the Celeron D 331. In this test, the Celeron D 331 scores its 456.95 points.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
The current single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing laptops and desktop PCs. The program, like its earlier versions, runs on systems: Mac OS, Windows, Linux. The Single-Core check uses one thread. For the first time in this version of the tester, both smartphones and tablets running Android and iOS operating systems are supported. The Pentium 4 2.4A scores the highest in Geekbench 4’s single-thread test with a score of 495.55 points, but not much ahead of the opponent.
But the Celeron D 331 itself also showed a good score of 454.98 points, slightly giving way to the Pentium 4 2.4A model.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi-Thread version of Geekbench 3 — allows you to make a big test on the «reliability» of your assembly and demonstrate how productive your OS is.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
The 32-bit version of the benchmark loads only one processor core and one thread. The Geekbench multi-platform benchmark is usually used to evaluate the system under Mac, but it works on both Windows and Linux. The basic purpose is to check the efficiency of the CPU.
Geekbench 2
Geekbench 2 is currently out of date. There are almost 200 CPU models in our archive that have test results in this program. At the moment, there are newer options, the current 5v and 4v.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In fact, this is a practical test of system performance by transcoding HD files to the new H.
264 format or the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. The number of frames processed per second. is the result of the test. An ideal benchmark for multi-core and multi-threaded CPUs. This test is faster than Pass 2 because it renders at a constant rate. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Pentium 4 2.4A model is slightly higher than that of the Celeron D 331, and amounted to 5.92 fps. Celeron D 331 managed to score 5.43 FPS, slightly behind the first processor.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. The final value is also defined in frames per second. As a result, we get a higher quality video file. It is important to understand that a very real task is being performed, and the x264 codec is used in many video programs. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the processing is at an inconsistent rate. Therefore, the results of the checks realistically reflect the performance of the system. During the encoding of the video file by the Pentium 4 2.
4A processor into the mpeg4 format, a processing speed of 1.26 Frames / s was obtained. While the Celeron D 331 is slightly behind with a score of 1.21 fps.
3DMark06 CPU
Written using the DirectX 9.0 library by the Finnish team Futuremark. CPUs are tested in two ways: the game AI does pathfinding, and the second test simulates the system using PhysX. Benchmark to evaluate the performance of the video system, and CPU. This benchmark is often used by gamers and fans to overclock the system and overclockers. Celeron D 331 showed itself a little faster in tests for game physics, pathfinding, gaining up to 285.87 points. The Pentium 4 2.4A also coped with these tasks, showing a good result of 278.34 points.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Approximately 200 processors on our website have 3DMark FSP data. It includes an arithmetic test that performs calculations in game physics.
WinRAR 4.0
The well-known data archiver. The speed of compression by the RAR algorithm was tested, for these purposes huge amounts of random data were used.