Firepro v5800 vs v5900: FirePro V5800 vs FirePro V5900 Graphics cards Comparison

8 ноября, 2022

FirePro V5800 vs FirePro V5900 Graphics cards Comparison

When choosing between FirePro V5800 and FirePro V5900, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let’s find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and FirePro V5900.

FirePro V5800

FirePro V5900

Check Price

Main Specs

  FirePro V5800 FirePro V5900
Power consumption (TDP) 74 Watt 75 Watt
Interface PCIe 2. 0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 1x DVI
 

Check Price
  • FirePro V5900 has 1% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • FirePro V5900 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and FirePro V5900 — with TeraScale 3.
  • Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 90 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
  • FirePro V5800 and FirePro V5900 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
  • FirePro V5900 is 1 mm longer, than FirePro V5800.
  • Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 6−7 4−5
ultra / 1080p 4−5 2−3
QHD / 1440p 0−1 1−2
low / 720p 16−18 14−16
medium / 1080p 7−8 7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p 10−12 10−11
ultra / 1080p 9−10 8−9
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 21−24 21−24
medium / 1080p 10−12 10−12
FirePro V5800 and FirePro V5900 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p 45−50 45−50
high / 1080p 45−50 40−45
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p 130−140 130−140
medium / 768p 100−110 100−110
ultra / 1080p 50−55 50−55
QHD / 1440p 27−30 24−27
4K / 2160p 27−30 12−14
high / 768p 75−80 75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p 55−60 50−55
ultra / 1080p 18−20 18−20
medium / 1080p 45−50 45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p 75−80 80−85
medium / 768p 55−60 55−60
ultra / 1080p 30−35 30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p 7−8 6−7
ultra / 1080p 7−8 5−6
4K / 2160p 3−4 5−6
low / 720p 18−20 16−18
medium / 1080p 8−9 7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p 14−16 7−8
ultra / 1080p 10−11 0−1
QHD / 1440p − 0−1
low / 720p 55−60 55−60
medium / 1080p 21−24 18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 10% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p 10−12 10−11
ultra / 1080p 10−11 −
QHD / 1440p 1−2 −
4K / 2160p − 8−9
low / 720p 24−27 21−24
medium / 1080p 12−14 12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p 50−55 50−55
medium / 768p 40−45 −
high / 1080p 10−12 10−11
ultra / 1080p 6−7 4−5
QHD / 1440p 0−1 −
medium / 720p − 40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p 4−5 3−4
ultra / 1080p 3−4 1−2
4K / 2160p 0−1 −
low / 720p 10−12 10−11
medium / 1080p 6−7 4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p 90−95 90−95
high / 1080p 85−90 −
ultra / 1080p 80−85 80−85
medium / 1080p 90−95 −
FirePro V5800 and FirePro V5900 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p 16−18 6−7
ultra / 1080p 14−16 2−3
4K / 2160p − 0−1
low / 720p 30−35 27−30
medium / 1080p 16−18 9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 81% more, than FirePro V5900.
ultra / 1080p 7−8 −
QHD / 1440p 0−1 −
low / 720p 10−12 10−11
medium / 1080p 10−11 9−10
FirePro V5800 and FirePro V5900 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p 21−24 20−22
medium / 768p 16−18 12−14
high / 1080p 9−10 6−7
ultra / 1080p 6−7 4−5
4K / 2160p − 3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 18% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p 85−90 75−80
medium / 768p 40−45 40−45
ultra / 1080p 18−20 18−20
high / 768p 35−40 30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

  FirePro V5800 FirePro V5900
Architecture TeraScale 2 TeraScale 3
Code name Juniper Cayman
Type Workstation Workstation
Release date 26 April 2010 24 May 2011
Pipelines 800 512
Core clock speed 690 MHz 600 MHz
Transistor count 1,040 million 2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Texture fill rate 27. 60 19.20
Floating-point performance 1,104.0 gflops 614.4 gflops
Length 229 mm 230 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 64 GB/s 64 GB/s
DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
OpenGL 4.4 4.4
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan N/A N/A
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 66 Mh/s
 

Check Price

Similar compares

  • FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R7 M370
  • FirePro V5800 vs Quadro K2100M
  • FirePro V5900 vs Radeon R7 M370
  • FirePro V5900 vs Quadro K2100M
  • FirePro V5800 vs FireStream 9270
  • FirePro V5800 vs Radeon RX 640
  • FirePro V5900 vs FireStream 9270
  • FirePro V5900 vs Radeon RX 640

AMD FirePro V5900 (FireGL V) vs ATI V5800

  • CPU
  • GPU
  • SSD
  • HDD
  • RAM
  • USB

▲
5132
▼

  

Release date ≤ Q3 2014.

VS

YouTube*NEW*

About

▲
5127
▼

  

Release date ≤ Q2 2014.

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 2,046 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

437 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 9% HP(103C 2306) 1GB
Worst Bench: 8% HP(103C 2306) 1GB

Poor: 8%

Great: 9%

SPEED RANK: 294th / 688

1,609 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 7% Dell(1028 2B06) 2GB
Worst Bench: 6% HP(103C 2B06) 2GB

Poor: 6%

Great: 7%

SPEED RANK: 355th / 688
Effective 3D Speed

Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		8.64 % Much faster effective speed.
+42% 		6.1 %
Lighting

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		12.1 fps Much better lighting effects.
+53% 		7.93 fps
Reflection

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		9.54 fps 16.2 fps Much better reflection handling.
+70%
MRender

Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		8.87 fps 12.7 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+43%
Gravity

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		9.13 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+53% 		5.96 fps
Lighting

Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		12.7 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+42% 		8.97 fps
Reflection

High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		11.4 fps 17.5 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+54%
MRender

Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		9.52 fps 13.3 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+40%
Gravity

NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		9.4 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+54% 		6.1 fps

Market Share

Based on 55,717,420 GPUs tested.

See market share leaders
Market Share

Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0 % 0 %
User Rating

UBM User Rating 		51 % 51 %
Age

Newest 		98+ Months +4% 102+ Months
Parallax

Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		11. 8 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+60% 		7.38 fps
Splatting

Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		12.6 fps 19.7 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+56%
Parallax

Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		10.5 fps Much better texture detail.
+47% 		7.15 fps
Splatting

Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		10.2 fps 14.4 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+41%

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

  • Dell OptiPlex 7010 (7)
  • HP Z400 Workstation (7)
  • HP Z600 Workstation (7)
  • HP Z800 Workstation (7)
  • Asus M5A78L LE (4)
  • Dell Precision WorkStation T3500 (4)
  • Dell Precision T5610 (3)
  • Dell Precision T3600 (57)
  • Dell Precision WorkStation T3500 (39)
  • Dell Precision T5600 (33)
  • bin bin (24)
  • HP Z400 Workstation (23)
  • Dell Precision WorkStation T5500 (20)
  • HP Z420 Workstation (19)

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works
  • — Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • — See speed test results from other users.
  • — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

  •   

    Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti

  •   

    Nvidia RTX 3070

  •   

    Nvidia RTX 3050

  •   

    Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)

  •   

    Nvidia RTX 3080

  •   

    Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)

  •   

    Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)

  •   

    Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB

  •   

    Nvidia RTX 2060

  •   

    AMD RX 6600-XT

  •   

    AMD RX 5600-XT

  •   

    Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback

AMD FirePro V5900 vs ATI FirePro V5800


Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V5900 and ATI FirePro V5800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

AMD FirePro V5900

Buy on Amazon


vs

ATI FirePro V5800

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V5900

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 1259 vs 1182
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 339 vs 285
  • Around 5% better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 2880 vs 2740
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames): 5078 vs 3352
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 5078 vs 3352








Launch date 24 May 2011 vs 26 April 2010
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
PassMark — G3D Mark 1259 vs 1182
PassMark — G2D Mark 339 vs 285
Geekbench — OpenCL 2880 vs 2740
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 5078 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 5078 vs 3352

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V5800

  • Around 15% higher core clock speed: 690 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 27. 6 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
  • Around 56% higher pipelines: 800 vs 512
  • Around 80% better floating-point performance: 1,104.0 gflops vs 614.4 gflops
  • Around 1% lower typical power consumption: 74 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2135 vs 1713
  • Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3319 vs 2091
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2135 vs 1713
  • Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3319 vs 2091











Core clock speed 690 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate 27.6 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 800 vs 512
Floating-point performance 1,104. 0 gflops vs 614.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 74 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2135 vs 1713
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3319 vs 2091
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2135 vs 1713
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3319 vs 2091

Compare benchmarks


GPU 1: AMD FirePro V5900
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V5800










PassMark — G3D Mark

GPU 1
GPU 2


PassMark — G2D Mark

GPU 1
GPU 2


Geekbench — OpenCL

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2












Name AMD FirePro V5900 ATI FirePro V5800
PassMark — G3D Mark 1259 1182
PassMark — G2D Mark 339 285
Geekbench — OpenCL 2880 2740
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 416.657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 65.919
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1713 2135
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 2091 3319
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 5078 3352
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1713 2135
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 2091 3319
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 5078 3352

Compare specifications (specs)


























AMD FirePro V5900 ATI FirePro V5800
Architecture TeraScale 3 TeraScale 2
Code name Cayman Juniper
Launch date 24 May 2011 26 April 2010
Place in performance rating 1002 798
Type Workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)

$479
Core clock speed 600 MHz 690 MHz
Floating-point performance 614. 4 gflops 1,104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 512 800
Texture fill rate 19.2 GTexel / s 27.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 74 Watt
Transistor count 2,640 million 1,040 million
Display Connectors 1x DVI 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Interface PCIe 2. 0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 230 mm 229 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None
DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.4
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB / s 64.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz 4000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Comparison of AMD FirePro V5900 and ATI FirePro V5800

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V5900 and ATI FirePro V5800 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

AMD FirePro V5900

versus

ATI FirePro V5800

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD FirePro V5900

  • Newer graphics card, release date difference 1 year(s) 0 month(s) 29 times the maximum memory size(s)

    • 90 times : 2 GB vs 1 GB

  • PassMark — G3D Mark performance approximately 7% higher: 1259 vs 1182
  • PassMark — G2D Mark performance approximately 19% higher% more: 339 vs 285
  • About 5% more performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 2880 vs 2740
  • About 51% more performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 5078 vs 3352
  • GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — T-Rex (Fps) about 51% more: 5078 vs 3352
Release date 24 May 2011 vs 26 April 2010
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
PassMark — G3D Mark 1259 vs 1182
PassMark — G2D Mark 339 vs 285
Geekbench — OpenCL 2880 vs 2740
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 5078 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 5078 vs 3352

Reasons to choose ATI FirePro V5800

  • About 15% more core clock: 690 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 44% more texturing speed: 27. 6 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
  • 56% more shader processors: 800 vs 512
  • 80% more floating point performance: 1,104.0 gflops vs 614.4 gflops
  • About 1% less power consumption: 74 Watt vs 75 Watt 9019 Memory frequency is 2x faster: 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • About 25% faster performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2135 vs 1713
  • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark about 59% more: 3319 vs 2091
  • About 25% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) benchmark: 2135 vs 1713
  • About 59% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 3319 vs 2091
Core frequency 690 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texturing speed 27.6 GTexel/s vs 19.2 GTexel/s
Number of shaders 800 vs 512
Floating point performance 1,104. 0 gflops vs 614.4 gflops
Power consumption (TDP) 74 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory frequency 4000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2135 vs 1713
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3319 vs 2091
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2135 vs 1713
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3319 vs 2091

Benchmark comparison

GPU 1: AMD FirePro V5900
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V5800

PassMark — G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
PassMark — G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
Geekbench — OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
Name AMD FirePro V5900 ATI FirePro V5800
PassMark — G3D Mark 1259 1182
PassMark — G2D Mark 339 285
Geekbench — OpenCL 2880 2740
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 416.657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 65.919
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1713 2135
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 2091 3319
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 5078 3352
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1713 2135
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 2091 3319
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 5078 3352

Performance comparison

AMD FirePro V5900 ATI FirePro V5800
Architecture TeraScale 3 TeraScale 2
Codename Cayman Juniper
Production date 24 May 2011 April 26, 2010
Place in the ranking 1002 798
Type Workstation Workstation
Price at first issue date $479
Core frequency 600 MHz 690MHz
Floating point performance 614. 4 gflops 1,104.0 gflops
Process 40nm 40nm
Number of shader processors 512 800
Texturing speed 19.2 GTexel/s 27.6 GTexel/s
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 74 Watt
Number of transistors 2,640 million 1,040 million
Video connectors 1x DVI 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Interface PCIe 2. 0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 230mm 229 mm
Additional power connectors None None
DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.4
Maximum memory size 2GB 1GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 64.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory frequency 2000 MHz 4000MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

ATI FirePro V5800 Overview.

Benchmarks and specs

The ATI FirePro V5800 (GPU) is ranked 471 in our performance ranking. Manufacturer: A.T.I. An ATI FirePro V5800 runs at a minimum clock speed of 690 MHz. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or during overclocking. The RAM size is 1 GB GB with a clock speed of 4000 MHz and a bandwidth of 64 GB/s.

The power consumption of the ATI FirePro V5800 is 74 Watt and the process technology is only 40 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.

Let’s take a closer look at the most important features of the ATI FirePro V5800. To have an idea of ​​which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service.

3.0
From 15
Hitesti Grade

Popular video cards

Most viewed

AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Intel UHD Graphics 630

Intel UHD Graphics 600

AMD Radeon RX Vega 10

NVIDIA Quadro T1000

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Intel HD Graphics 530

Intel UHD Graphics 620

Intel HD Graphics 4600

Intel HD Graphics 520

Buy here:

Yandex Market

SberMegaMarket

AliExpress

General information

A basic set of information will help you find out the release date of the ATI FirePro V5800 video card and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost. This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.

Performance Rating Position: 555
Architecture: TeraScale 2
Code name: Juniper
Type: Workstation
Release date: April 26, 2010 (11 years ago)
Starting price: $479
Current price: $147 (0.3x MSRP)
Value for money: 1.47
GPU codename: Juniper
Market segment: Workstation

Specifications

This is important information that determines all the performance characteristics of the ATI FirePro V5800 video card. The smaller the technological process of manufacturing a chip, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining).

Conveyors: 800
Core Clock: 690 MHz
Number of transistors: 1,040 million
Process: 40nm
Power consumption (TDP): 74 Watt
Number of texels processed in 1 second: 27.60
Floating point: 1,104.0 gflops
Pipelines / CUDA cores: 800
Number of transistors: 1,040 million
Estimated heat output: 74 Watt

Dimensions, Connectors and Compatibility

There are so many PC case and laptop form factors available today that it’s important to know the length of your graphics card and how it’s connected (except for laptop versions). This will help make the upgrade process easier, as Not all cases can accommodate modern video cards.

Interface: PCIe 2.0 x16
Length: 229 mm
Additional power: None

Memory (Frequency and Overclocking)

Internal memory is used to store data when performing calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for ATI FirePro V5800 + overclocking in turbo mode.

Memory type: GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount: 1GB
Memory bus width: 128 Bit
Memory frequency: 4000MHz
Memory bandwidth: 64 GB/s

Support for ports and displays

As a rule, all modern video cards have several types of connections and additional ports, for example HDMI and DVI . Knowing these features is very important in order to avoid problems connecting a video card to a monitor or other peripherals.

Display connections: 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API support

All APIs supported by the ATI FirePro V5800 graphics card are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.

DirectX: 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL: 4.4

General gaming performance

All tests are based on FPS. Let’s see how the ATI FirePro V5800 ranks in the gaming performance test (the calculation was made in accordance with the recommendations of the game developer for system requirements; it may differ from real situations).

Select games
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed ​​HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2. 0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed ​​PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Survival 2Middle-earth:8 Shadow of WarFIFA EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind Divid edMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Border 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysi s — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5 GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Death Stranding (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

F1 2020 (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Gears Tactics (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Doom Eternal (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Description
5 Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates.
May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates.
30 Fluent — Based on all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25 fps or more
40 Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more
60 Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more
May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to show smooth frame rates.
? Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene.
Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category.
The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value.

ATI FirePro V5800 in benchmark results

Benchmarks help determine performance in standard ATI FirePro V5800 benchmarks. We have compiled a list of the most famous benchmarks in the world so that you can get accurate results for each of them (see description). Pre-testing the graphics card is especially important when there are high loads, so that the user can see how the graphics processor copes with calculations and data processing.

Overall performance in benchmarks

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

AMD Radeon R7 M370

ATI FirePro V5800

AMD Radeon RX 550X

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Passmark benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check Passmark GPU test results at hitesti.com

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

AMD Radeon R7 M370

ATI FirePro V5800

AMD Radeon RX 550X

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

3.0
From 15
Hitesti Grade

Share on social networks:

To leave a review, you need to log in

Review ATI FirePro V5800

Compare ATI FirePro V5800

VS

NVIDIA NVS 810

NVIDIA GeForce 8400GS Rev. 3

AMD Hainan

NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

AMD Fiji

AMD Tonga

AMD Bonaire

AMD Cedar

NVIDIA TITAN Xp

AMD Tahiti

ATI FirePro V5800 — 26 secret facts, review, specifications, reviews.

Top specifications and features

  • Passmark score
  • GPU base clock
  • RAM
  • Memory Bandwidth
  • Effective memory speed

Passmark

ATI FirePro V5800 test score:
1387
Best score:
29325

Performance

ATI FirePro V5800:
1453
Best score:

Memory

ATI FirePro V5800:
345
Best score:

General Information

ATI FirePro V5800:
550
Best score:

ATI FirePro V5800 features:
147
Best score:

Description

ATI FirePro V5800 video card based on TeraScale 2 architecture has 1040 million transistors, tech. 40 nm process. Graphics core frequency is 690 MHz. In terms of memory, 1 GB is installed here. DDR5, 1000MHz frequency and 64Gb/s maximum bandwidth. The texture size is 27.6 GTexels/s. FLOPS is 1.1.

In tests, the video card ATI FirePro V5800 showed itself as follows — according to the Passmark benchmark, the model scored 1387 points. At the same time, the maximum number of points for today is 260261 points.
The version of Directx is 11.2. The OpenGL version is 4.4. Regarding cooling, here the heat dissipation requirements are 74 watts.
In our tests, the video card scores 13114 points.

Why ATI FirePro V5800 is better than others

  • Thermal Dissipation (TDP) 74 W. This parameter is lower than 55%
  • Passmark score 1387 . This setting is lower than 47%
  • GPU base clock speed 690 MHz. This parameter is lower than 62%
  • RAM 1 GB. This parameter is lower than 66%
  • Memory bandwidth 64 GB/s. This parameter is lower than 57%
  • Effective memory speed 4000 MHz. This parameter is lower than that of 46%
  • GPU memory frequency 1000 MHz. This parameter is lower than 56%
  • FLOPS 1.1 TFLOPS. This parameter is lower than that of 69%

Overview ATI FirePro V5800

Performance

Memory

general information

Functions

Ports

Tests in benchmarks

ATI FirePro V5800 Review: Highlights


GPU base clock

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.

690MHz

max 2457

Average: 938 MHz

2457MHz


GPU memory frequency

This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth

1000MHz

max 16000

Average: 1326.6 MHz

16000MHz


FLOPS

A measure of the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.

1.1TFLOPS

max 1142.32

Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

1142.32TFLOPS


Texture size

A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all

27.6 GTexels/s

max 756.8

Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

756.8 GTexels/s


Architecture name

TeraScale 2


GPU name

Juniper


Memory bandwidth

This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.

64GB/s

max 2656

Average: 198.3 GB/s

2656GB/s


Effective memory speed

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all

4000MHz

max 19500

Average: 6984.5 MHz

19500MHz


RAM

1GB

max 128

Average: 4.6 GB

128GB


GDDR Memory Versions

Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
Show all

5

Average: 4.5

6


Memory bus width

A wide memory bus indicates that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all

128bit

max 8192

Average: 290.1bit

8192bit


Release date

2010-04-26 00:00:00

Mean value:


Heat Dissipation (TDP)

The Heat Dissipation Requirements (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all

74W

Average: 140.4W

2W


Process technology

The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

40 nm

Average: 47.5 nm

4 nm


Number of transistors

The higher the number, the more powerful the processor is

1040 million

max 80000

Average: 5043 million

80000 million


PCIe version

Considerable speed is provided for an expansion card used to connect a computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all

2

Mean: 2.8

5


Width

229mm

max 421.7

Average: 242.6mm

421.7 mm


Purpose

Workstation


DirectX

Used in demanding games providing enhanced graphics

11.2

max 12.2

Average: 11.1

12.2


OpenCL version

Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all

1.2

max 4. 6

Average: 1.7

4.6


opengl version

Later versions provide better game graphics

4.4

max 4.6

Average: 4

4.6


Shader model version

5

max 6.6

Average: 5.5

6.6


DisplayPort

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort

2

Average: 2

4


DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI

one

Mean: 1.4

3


Passmark test score

1387

max 29325

Average: 7628.