NVIDIA Launches The Low-End GeForce GT 710 Graphics Card
While we wait for Pascal, NVIDIA has silently launched their GeForce GT 710 graphics card which is a low-end solution aimed at low profile platforms such as HTPC and media boxes. The GeForce GT 710 isn’t a card that is built for gamers but a dedicated, low cost solution built to deliver better performance over an integrated GPU solution.
The NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 is aimed at a market that doesn’t require high-performance products and would rather stick with low cost solutions. The GeForce GT 710 may not be much faster compared to the regular iGPU you found on your Intel processor or an AMD APU but it does provide the advantage of a dedicated graphics solution, offering better display capabilities and graphics rendering capabilities which otherwise aren’t found on most integrated GPUs. The GeForce GT 710 comes with CUDA, 3D Vision, PhysX, Adaptive VSync and DirectX 12 support.
Coming to the specifications, NVIDIA’s GeForce GT 710 is based on the older Kepler architecture. It uses the GK208 graphics core which is a revised version of the GK108 graphics core and has 192 CUDA cores in total which means only 1 SMX is found on the graphics chip (Kepler has 192 CC per SM compared to 128 CC per SM on Maxwell). The chip is clocked at 954 MHz though that may differ with AIB specific models. The card pack up to 2 GB of DDR3 memory that is clocked at 1.8 Gbps and runs along a 64-bit bus interface. The card pumps out a bandwidth of 14.4 GB/s. The GeForce GT 710 is a low end graphics card and maintains a 19W TDP. Display outputs include HDMI, Dual Link DVI-D and VGA ports. The card will be available in several form factors that include single slot, single slot (low-profile) and dual-slot models.
NVIDIA themselves mention that the GeForce GT 710 can deliver up to 10x better performance than a iGPU and is faster than 80% of all iGPUs. That still does mean that the latest solutions from Intel and AMD are more powerful than the low-end GPUs available but come at a higher cost compared to the GT 710.
Comparing the Intel’s Iris and AMD’s Radeon iGPUs with GT 710, both iGPUs are found on processors that retail above the $150 US price range. NVIDIA’s GeForce GT 710 on the other hand has a price of just $30 US for the 1 GB and $40 US for the 2 GB variants.
While Intel stated that their Iris and Iris Pro graphics can outperform 80% of the discrete GPUs in the market, NVIDIA has released a counter statement that their GeForce GT 710 can outperform 80% of integrated GPUs. The GeForce GT 710 is an interesting low-end solution, one which may not be mentioned in the enthusiast market at all but will become a good option for users who don’t want to spend a lot on building a low cost home or office PC and want better graphics performance than what their integrated graphics processor may have to offer. The recent Celeron chips that retail for $42 US would go well with the GeForce GT 710 in building a low cost PC. The GeForce GT 710 is available in the market with several models from NVIDIA’s partners.
| Graphics Card Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
|---|---|
| Graphics Architecture | NVIDIA Kepler GK208 |
| Process | 28nm Process |
| CUDA Cores | 192 CCs |
| Core Clock | 954 MHz |
| VRAM | Up to 2 GB DDR3 |
| Memory Clock | 1.8 GHz |
| Memory Bus | 64-bit bus |
| Memory Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
| Display Outputs | HDMI, Dual Link DVI, VGA |
| TDP | 19W |
| Form Factors | Single Slot / Dual Slot (Low Profile) |
| Price | $30-$40 US |
ASUS GeForce GT 710 Graphics Card:
2 of 9
EVGA GeForce GT 710 Graphics Card:
2 of 9
MSI GeForce GT 710 Graphics Card:
2 of 9
Zotac GeForce GT 710 Graphics Card:
2 of 9
Inno3D GeForce GT 710 Graphics Card:
2 of 9
Galax GeForce GT 710 Graphics Card:
2 of 9
Gigabyte GeForce GT 710 Graphics Card:
2 of 9
Share this story
GeForce GT 710 [in 9 benchmarks]
NVIDIA
GeForce GT 710
Buy
- Interface PCIe 2.
0 x8 - Core clock speed 954
- Max video memory 2 GB
- Memory type DDR3
- Memory clock speed 1.8 Gbps
- Maximum resolution
Summary
NVIDIA started GeForce GT 710 sales 27 March 2014 at a recommended price of $34.99. This is Kepler architecture desktop card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use. 2 GB of DDR3 memory clocked at 1.8 GB/s are supplied, and together with 64 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 14.4 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is dual-width card attached via PCIe 2.0 x8 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 5.7″ (14.5 cm). No additional power connector is required, and power consumption is at 19 Watt.
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at
1.62%
of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce GT
710
vs
GeForce RTX
4090
General info
Some basic facts about GeForce GT 710: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in performance rating | 835 | |
| Place by popularity | 46 | |
| Value for money | 0.23 | |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | |
| GPU code name | GK208B | |
| Market segment | Desktop | |
| Release date | 27 March 2014 (8 years ago) | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
| Current price | $80 (2. 3x MSRP) |
of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Value for money
To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Technical specs
GeForce GT 710’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce GT 710’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | of 18432 (AD102) |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
| Number of transistors | 915 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti) |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 19 Watt | of 900 (Tesla S2050) |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 15. 26 |
of 969.9 (h200 SXM5 96 GB) |
| Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce GT 710’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | |
| Length | 5.7″ (14.5 cm) | |
| Height | 2.713″ (6.9 cm) | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GT 710: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth.
Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | of 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
| Shared memory | — |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce GT 710. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | |
| Multi monitor support | 3 displays | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal |
Technologies
Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce GT 710. You’ll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| 3D Vision | + | |
| PureVideo | + | |
| PhysX | + |
API support
APIs supported by GeForce GT 710, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5. 1 |
|
| OpenGL | 4.5 | of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance of GeForce GT 710. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GT 710
1.62
- Passmark
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- GeekBench 5 OpenCL
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
- GeekBench 5 Vulkan
- GeekBench 5 CUDA
- Octane Render OctaneBench
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite.
It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
GT 710
634
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GT 710
932
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920×1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GT 710
947
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks.
It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280×720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GT 710
7270
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
GT 710
2026
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280×720 resolution.
Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
GT 710
70459
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
GT 710
1907
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
GT 710
1519
Octane Render OctaneBench
This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc.
, available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
GT 710
6
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GT 710. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s |
Game benchmarks
Let’s see how good GeForce GT 710 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 7 | |
| 1440p | 3 | |
| 4K | 7 |
Popular games
- Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 5 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | |
| Hitman 3 | 5 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 2−3 |
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 4 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | |
| Metro Exodus | 3 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 2−3 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5 |
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 4 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2 | |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 3−4 |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3 | |
| Hitman 3 | 1−2 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 4−5 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 |
Relative perfomance
Overall GeForce GT 710 performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop video cards.
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
103.7
AMD FireStream 9170
101.85
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
101.23
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
100
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
98.77
NVIDIA GeForce 810A
98.15
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
97.53
AMD equivalent
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GT 710 from AMD is Radeon HD 2900 PRO, which is slower by 1% and lower by 6 positions in our rating.
Radeon HD
2900 PRO
Compare
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GT 710:
AMD Radeon R8 M535DX
105.
56
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
103.7
AMD FireStream 9170
101.85
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
100
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
98.77
AMD Radeon HD 7570
95.68
AMD Radeon R5 A240
90.74
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Radeon HD
8670D
Compare
Radeon HD
7660D
Compare
Radeon HD
7560D
Compare
Radeon HD
6450 GDDR5
Compare
Radeon HD
8570D
Compare
Radeon HD
6550D
Compare
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with GeForce GT 710 according to our statistics.
Core i3
9100F
4%
Core i3
10100F
3.6%
Core i3
1005G1
2.6%
Core i5
9400F
2.4%
Core i5
3470
2%
Core i5
2400
1.9%
Core i5
1035G1
1.8%
Core i3
2100
1.
7%
Core i5
10400F
1.6%
Core i3
3220
1.5%
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about GeForce GT 710, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
GeForce GT 710 [in 9 benchmarks]
NVIDIA
GeForce GT 710
- PCIe 2.0 x8 interface
- Core frequency 954
- Video memory size 2 GB
- Memory type DDR3
- Memory frequency 1.8 Gbps
- Maximum resolution
Description
NVIDIA started GeForce GT 710 sales on March 27, 2014 at a recommended price of 34.
99$. This is a desktop video card based on the Kepler architecture and 28 nm manufacturing process, primarily designed for office use. It has 2 GB of DDR3 memory at 1.8 Gb/s, and coupled with a 64-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s.
In terms of compatibility, this is a two-slot PCIe 2.0 x8 card. The length of the reference version is 14.5 cm. No additional power cable is required for connection, and the power consumption is 19 W.
It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of
1.62%
from the leader, which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce GT
710
vs
GeForce RTX
4090
General information
Cost
To obtain the index and their costs and their costs.
value of other cards.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Characteristics
GeForce GT 710’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak about GeForce GT 710’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Number of stream processors | 192 | of 18432 (AD102) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| no |
RAM
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GT 710 — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Maximum memory | ||
| Shared memory | — |
Video outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce GT 710. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
| Video Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | 9 |
Technology
Technology solutions and APIs supported by GeForce GT 710 are listed here.
You will need this information if your graphics card is required to support specific technologies.
| 3D Vision | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PureVideo | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PhysX | + | 0634
Overall benchmark performanceThis is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GT 710
Passmark This is a very common benchmark included in the Passmark PerformanceTest package. Benchmark coverage: 26%
GT 710 3DMark Fire Strike ScoreBenchmark coverage: 14%
GT 710 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests showing a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature that appears to be made of lava. Using resolution 1920×1080, Fire Strike shows quite realistic graphics and is quite demanding on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14%
GT 710 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU Cloud Gate is a legacy benchmark that uses DirectX 11 feature level 10, used to test home PCs and low-end laptops. It displays several scenes of some strange teleportation device launching spaceships into the unknown at a fixed resolution of 1280×720. Benchmark coverage: 14%
GT 710 GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widely used benchmark for graphics cards that combines 11 different test scenarios. All of these scenarios are based on the direct use of the processing power of the GPU, without the use of 3D rendering. This option uses the Khronos Group’s OpenCL API. Benchmark coverage: 9%
GT 710 3DMark Ice Storm GPU Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of the 3DMark package. Ice Storm has been used to measure the performance of entry-level laptops and Windows-based tablets. It uses DirectX 11 feature level 9 to render a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet at 1280×720 resolution. Support for Ice Storm ended in January 2020, now the developers recommend using Night Raid instead. Benchmark coverage: 8%
GT 710 GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widely used benchmark for graphics cards that combines 11 different test scenarios. All of these scenarios are based on the direct use of the processing power of the GPU, without the use of 3D rendering. This option uses the Vulkan API from AMD and the Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5%
GT 710 GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widely used benchmark for graphics cards that combines 11 different test scenarios. All of these scenarios are based on the direct use of the processing power of the GPU, without the use of 3D rendering. This option uses NVIDIA’s CUDA API. Benchmark coverage: 5%
GT 710 Octane Render OctaneBench This is a dedicated benchmark for measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine created by OTOY Inc. Benchmark coverage: 4%
GT 710 Mining hashratesGeForce GT 710 performance in cryptocurrency mining. Usually the result is measured in mhash / s — the number of millions of solutions generated by the video card in one second.
Game testsFPS in popular games on the GeForce GT 710, as well as compliance with system requirements. Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests. Average FPSHere are the average FPS values for a large selection of popular games at various resolutions: Ultra Preset High Preset Ultra Preset
Relative capacity
Overall GeForce GT 710 performance compared to its nearest desktop counterparts.
ATI Radeon HD 2900XT
AMD FireStream 9170
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce 810A
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 Competitor from AMDWe believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GT 710 from AMD is Radeon HD 2900 PRO, which is slower by 1% on average and lower by 6 positions in our rating. Compare Here are some of AMD’s closest competitors to the GeForce GT 710:
AMD Radeon R8 M535DX
ATI Radeon HD 2900XT
AMD FireStream 9170
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
AMD Radeon HD 7570
AMD Radeon R5 A240 Other video cardsHere we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one. Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare Recommended Processors According to our statistics, these processors are most often used with the GeForce GT 710. 4% 3.6% 2.6% 2.4% 2% 1.9% 1.8% 1.7% 1.6% 1. User ratingHere you can see the rating of the video card by users, as well as put your own rating. Tips and commentsHere you can ask a question about the GeForce GT 710, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. Asus Radeon RX 550 vs MSI GeForce GT 710 2GB: What is the difference?38 BALLLA ASUS Radeon RX 550 25 BALLLA MSI GEFORCE GT 710 2GB Winter Is Radeon RX 550 better than MSI GeForce GT 710 2GB?
Why is MSI GeForce GT 710 2GB better than Asus Radeon RX 550?
Which comparisons are the most popular?Asus Radeon RX 550 vs Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super MSI GeForce GT 710 2GB vs Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 Asus Radeon RX 550 vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop MSI GeForce GT 710 2GB vs GIGABYTE RADEON RX 550 ASUS Radeon RX 550 VS MSI Radeon RX 6500 XT MESH 2X MSI GEFORCE GT 710 2GB 9000 VS 9000 9000 ASUS RADEON VEGA RADEON VEGA RADEON VEGA RADEON VEGA RADEON VEGA PNY GEFORCE GTX 1050 MSI GEFORCE GT 710 2GB VS AMD Radeon R5 ASUS RADEON RX 550 VS SAPPHire Pulse Radeon RXI MSIS GTOR MSI0002 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Asus Radeon RX 550 vs EMTEK GeForce GTX 780 MSI GeForce GT 710 2GB vs Asus GeForce GTX 550 Ti DirectCU Ultimate Asus Radeon RX 550 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 MSI GeForce GT 710 2GB 0002 MSI GeForce GT 710 2GB vs Gigabyte GeForce GT 630 2GB Asus Radeon RX 550 vs MSI Radeon RX 6400 Aero ITX 4G MSI GeForce GT 710 2GB vs AMD Radeon RX 580 ASUS RADEON RX 550 VS EVGA GEFORCE GTX 1630 SC Gaming MSI GEFORCE GT 710 2GB VS NVIDIA GEFORCE 9800 GT 9000 CostsGeneral ratingASUS RADEON RX 550 0 Reviews of users ASUS Radeon RX 550 0. 0 Reviews of users MSI GT 710 2GB 3 Users 9000 9000 9000 3 710 2GB 5.0 /10 3 User reviews FeaturesValue for money No reviews yet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
He gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation by running four separate tests for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the latter is done in 4K resolution if possible), and a few more tests using DirectCompute. 
As with the Ice Storm benchmark, it was deprecated in January 2020 and 3DMark Night Raid is now recommended instead. 
, available either as a standalone program or as a plug-in for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other applications. It renders four different static scenes and then compares the render times to the reference card, which is the GeForce GTX 9 at the moment.80. This benchmark does not measure gaming performance and is intended for professional 3D artists. 
7
5% 
6 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? 
0 /10 
More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster. 
