Gtx 1070 vs rx 590: RX 590 vs GTX 1070 Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-8700K vs i7-6700K)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 vs XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy: comparisions

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

VS

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy

Rating: 27 points

WINNER

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

Rating: 32 points

Performance

Memory

General information

Functions

Benchmark tests

Top specs and features

• Passmark test score
• 3DMark Fire Strike Score
• 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics benchmark score
• 3DMark Ice Storm GPU Benchmark Score
• 3DMark Vantage Performance Benchmark

Passmark test score

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy: 9424
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070: 13131

3DMark Fire Strike Score

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy: 14142
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070: 14684

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics benchmark score

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy: 16478
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070: 17890

3DMark Ice Storm GPU Benchmark Score

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy: 389758
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070: 454588

3DMark Vantage Performance Benchmark

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy: 47485
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070: 49975

Description

The XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy video card is based on the Polaris architecture. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 on the Pascal architecture. The first has 5700 million transistors. The second is 7200 million. XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy has a transistor size of 12 nm versus 16.

The base clock speed of the first video card is 1469 MHz versus 1506 MHz for the second.

Let’s move on to memory. XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy has 8 GB. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 has 8 GB installed. The bandwidth of the first video card is 256 Gb/s versus 256.3 Gb/s of the second.

FLOPS of XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy is 6.98. At NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 6.2.

Goes to tests in benchmarks. In the Passmark benchmark, XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy scored 9424 points. And here is the second card 13131 points. In 3DMark, the first model scored 16478 points. Second 17890 points.

In terms of interfaces. The first video card is connected using PCIe 3.0 x16. The second is PCIe 3.0 x16. Video card XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy has Directx version 12. The OpenGL version is 4.6. Video card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 — Directx version — 12. The OpenGL version is 4.6.

Regarding cooling, XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy has 175W heat dissipation requirements versus 150W for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070.

Why NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is better than XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070: highlights

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

GPU base clock speed

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.

1469 MHz

max 2459

Average: 1124.9 MHz

1506 MHz

max 2459

Average: 1124.9 MHz

Gpu memory speed

This is an important aspect for calculating memory bandwidth.

2000 MHz

max 16000

Average: 1468 MHz

2002 MHz

max 16000

Average: 1468 MHz

FLOPS

Measuring the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.

6.98 TFLOPS

max 1142.32

Average: 53 TFLOPS

6.2 TFLOPS

max 1142.32

Average: 53 TFLOPS

RAM

8 GB

max 128

Average: 4.6 GB

8 GB

max 128

Average: 4.6 GB

Turbo gpu

If the GPU speed has dropped below its limit, then to improve performance, it can go to a high clock speed.

1545 MHz

max 2903

Average: 1514 MHz

1683 MHz

max 2903

Average: 1514 MHz

Texture size

A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.

222.5 GTexels/s

max 756.8

Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

180.7 GTexels/s

max 756.8

Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

Architecture name

Polaris

Pascal

GPU

Polaris 30

GP104

Shared memory

Not available

Not available

Memory bandwidth

This is the rate at which the device stores or reads information.

256 GB/s

max 2656

Average: 257.8 GB/s

256.3 GB/s

max 2656

Average: 257.8 GB/s

Effective memory speed

The effective memory clock is calculated from the size and transfer rate of the memory information. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show more

8000 MHz

max 19500

Average: 6984.5 MHz

8000 MHz

max 19500

Average: 6984.5 MHz

RAM

8 GB

max 128

Average: 4.6 GB

8 GB

max 128

Average: 4.6 GB

GDDR memory versions

Latest versions of GDDR memory provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance

5

Average: 4.9

5

Average: 4. 9

Memory bus width

A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects memory performance as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show more

256 bit

max 8192

Average: 283.9 bit

256 bit

max 8192

Average: 283.9 bit

Power Consumption (TDP)

Heat Dissipation Requirements (TDP) is the maximum possible amount of energy dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed
Show more

175 W

Average: 160 W

150 W

Average: 160 W

Technological process

The small size of the semiconductors means this is a new generation chip.

12 nm

Average: 34.7 nm

16 nm

Average: 34.7 nm

Number of transistors

The higher their number, the more processor power this indicates.

5700 million

max 80000

Average: 7150 million

7200 million

max 80000

Average: 7150 million

PCIe connection interface

A considerable speed of the expansion card used to connect the computer to the peripherals is provided. The updated versions offer impressive bandwidth and high performance.
Show more

3

Average: 3

3

Average: 3

Width

270 mm

max 421. 7

Average: 192.1 mm

267 mm

max 421.7

Average: 192.1 mm

Height

124 mm

max 619

Average: 89.6 mm

111 mm

max 619

Average: 89.6 mm

DirectX

Used in demanding games, providing improved graphics

12

max 12.2

Average: 11.4

12

max 12.2

Average: 11.4

OpenGL

Used by some applications to harness the power of the GPU for non-graphical computations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be

2

max 4.6

Average: 2.2

3

max 4.6

Average: 2.2

OpenGL

Later versions provide high quality gaming graphics

4.6

max 4.6

Average: 4.2

4.6

max 4.6

Average: 4.2

Supports FreeSync technology

Available

There is no data

Shader model

6.4

max 6.6

Average: 5.9

6.4

max 6.6

Average: 5. 9

Vulkan

1.2

1.3

Has hdmi output

HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports. They can send video and audio to the display.

Available

Available

HDMI version

The latest version provides a wide signal transmission channel due to the increased number of audio channels, frames per second, etc.

2

max 2.1

Average: 1.9

max 2.1

Average: 1.9

DisplayPort

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort

3

Average: 2.2

3

Average: 2. 2

DVI Outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI

1

Average: 1.4

1

Average: 1.4

Number of HDMI connectors

The more their number, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game / TV set-top boxes)

1

Average: 1.1

1

Average: 1.1

Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16

HDMI

Available

Available

Passmark test score

9424

max 29325

Average: 7628. 6

13131

max 29325

Average: 7628.6

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU benchmark score

85089

max 191204

Average: 80042.3

104795

max 191204

Average: 80042.3

3DMark Fire Strike Score

14142

max 38276

Average: 12463

14684

max 38276

Average: 12463

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics benchmark score

16478

max 49575

Average: 11859.1

17890

max 49575

Average: 11859. 1

3DMark 11 Performance GPU Benchmark

22896

max 57937

Average: 18799.9

24159

max 57937

Average: 18799.9

3DMark Vantage Performance Benchmark

47485

max 97887

Average: 37830.6

49975

max 97887

Average: 37830.6

3DMark Ice Storm GPU Benchmark Score

389758

max 533357

Average: 372425.7

454588

max 533357

Average: 372425.7

SPECviewperf 12 score — Showcase

71

max 175

Average: 108. 4

80

max 175

Average: 108.4

SPECviewperf 12 score — 3ds Max

118

max 269

Average: 169.8

167

max 269

Average: 169.8

FAQ

How does the XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy processor perform in benchmarks?

Passmark XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy scored 9424 points. The second video card scored 13131 points in Passmark.

What FLOPS do video cards have?

FLOPS XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy is 6.98 TFLOPS. But the second video card has FLOPS equal to 6.2 TFLOPS.

What power consumption?

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy 175 Watt. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 150 Watt.

How fast are XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070?

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy operates at 1469 MHz. In this case, the maximum frequency reaches 1545 MHz. The clock base frequency of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 reaches 1506 MHz. In turbo mode it reaches 1683 MHz.

What kind of memory do graphics cards have?

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy supports GDDR5. Installed 8 GB of RAM. Throughput reaches 256 GB/s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 works with GDDR5. The second one has 8 GB of RAM installed. Its bandwidth is 256 GB/s.

How many HDMI connectors do they have?

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy has 1 HDMI outputs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is equipped with 1 HDMI outputs.

What power connectors are used?

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy uses There is no data. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is equipped with There is no data HDMI outputs.

What architecture are video cards based on?

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy is built on Polaris. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 uses the Pascal architecture.

What graphics processor is being used?

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy is equipped with Polaris 30. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is set to GP104.

How many PCIe lanes

The first graphics card has There is no data PCIe lanes. And the PCIe version is 3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 There is no data PCIe lanes. PCIe version 3.

How many transistors?

XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy has 5700 million transistors. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 has 7200 million transistors

GTX 1070 vs RX 590 ⚙️

0x108.762MH/s139W0.063MH/W

Allium7.497MH/s111W0.068MH/W

Argon2d-dyn128.56KH/s119W1.08KH/W

Argon2d-ninja—KH/s—W—KH/W

Argon2d250508.995KH/s150W3.393KH/W

Argon2d409623.14KH/s142W0.163KH/W

Astralhash9. 457MH/s110W0.086MH/W

Autolykos250.766MH/s104W0.488MH/W

BCD18.892MH/s118W0.16MH/W

BMW512633.925MH/s81W7.826MH/W

BeamHashII24.06H/s112W0.215H/W

BeamHashIII15.915H/s127W0.125H/W

Blake (14r)2.421GH/s151W0.016GH/W

Blake (2b)1.288GH/s97W0.013GH/W

Blake (2b-BTCC)1136.805MH/s143W7.95MH/W

Blake (2s)3.143GH/s134W0.023GH/W

Blake (2s-Kadena)0. 665GH/s95W0.007GH/W

C1122.633MH/s119W0.19MH/W

CNReverseWaltz776.58H/s97W8.006H/W

Chukwa51.317KH/s137W0.375KH/W

Chukwa218.225KH/s139W0.131KH/W

ChukwaWRKZ75.67KH/s148W0.511KH/W

Cortex0.035H/s108W0H/W

CryptoNight0.607KH/s80W0.008KH/W

CryptoNightAlloy321.13H/s82W3.916H/W

CryptoNightArto557.008H/s81W6.877H/W

CryptoNightBBC2941. 927KH/s—W—KH/W

CryptoNightConceal1209.233H/s80W15.115H/W

CryptoNightFast1131.5H/s73W15.5H/W

CryptoNightFastV2—H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightGPU1201.8H/s148W8.12H/W

CryptoNightHaven672.678H/s89W7.558H/W

CryptoNightHeavy669.1H/s77W8.69H/W

CryptoNightHeavyX253.586H/s86W2.949H/W

CryptoNightLiteV71.318KH/s90W0.015KH/W

CryptoNightR603.1H/s98W6. 154H/W

CryptoNightSaber658.657H/s95W6.933H/W

CryptoNightStelliteV4613.17H/s80W7.665H/W

CryptoNightStelliteV51088.29H/s110W9.894H/W

CryptoNightTalleo0.006MH/s84W0MH/W

CryptoNightTurtle5.156KH/s102W0.051KH/W

CryptoNightUPX220.072KH/s76W0.264KH/W

CryptoNightV70.656KH/s84W0.008KH/W

CryptoNightV8599.35H/s96W6.243H/W

CryptoNightWOW1103.455H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightZLS819. 625H/s93W8.813H/W

Cuckaroo29S3.097H/s81W0.038H/W

Cuckaroo29b2.845H/s144W0.02H/W

CuckooBFC106.8H/s102W1.047H/W

CuckooCycle4.857H/s111W0.044H/W

Curvehash616743000000H/s82W7521256097.561H/W

Dedal6.279MH/s129W0.049MH/W

Eaglesong0.584GH/s114W0.005GH/W

Equihash0.451KH/s158W0.003KH/W

Equihash(125,4)31.37H/s126W0.249H/W

Equihash(144,5)42H/s115W0. 365H/W

Equihash(150,5)22.693H/s150W0.151H/W

Equihash(192,7)24.72H/s110W0.225H/W

Equihash(210,9)192H/s122W1.574H/W

Equihash(96,5)19.097KH/s103W0.185KH/W

Equihash+Scrypt20.332KH/s163W0.125KH/W

EquihashBTCZ42H/s137W0.307H/W

EquihashBTG40H/s137W0.292H/W

EquihashSAFE42H/s127W0.331H/W

EquihashZEL43H/s173W0.249H/W

Etchash26.902MH/s120W0. 224MH/W

Ethash25.8MH/s107W0.241MH/W

EvrProgPow7.27MH/s69W0.105MH/W

FiroPoW5.285MH/s55W0.096MH/W

GhostRider507H/s50W10.14H/W

Globalhash22.416MH/s96W0.234MH/W

Groestl0.035GH/s123W0GH/W

HMQ17253.795MH/s95W0.04MH/W

Handshake0.235GH/s151W0.002GH/W

HeavyHash278.533MH/s156W1.785MH/W

Hex13.196MH/s98W0. 135MH/W

HoneyComb40.308MH/s92W0.438MH/W

Jeonghash5.287MH/s93W0.057MH/W

KAWPOW12.95MH/s126W0.103MH/W

KHeavyHash153.699MH/s55W2.795MH/W

Keccak0.686GH/s115W0.006GH/W

Keccak-C0.687GH/s152W0.005GH/W

LBRY0.267GH/s141W0.002GH/W

Lyra2REv233.899MH/s116W0.292MH/W

Lyra2REv331.107MH/s102W0.305MH/W

Lyra2vc0ban30.864MH/s78W0. 396MH/W

Lyra2z1.666MH/s82W0.02MH/W

Mike663MH/s78W8.5MH/W

Myr-Groestl0.042GH/s47W0.001GH/W

NIST50.03GH/s173W0GH/W

NeoScrypt0.892MH/s138W0.006MH/W

NexaPoW3.204MH/s94W0.034MH/W

Octopus7.595MH/s104W0.073MH/W

PHI161224.071MH/s112W0.215MH/W

PHI26.726MH/s114W0.059MH/W

Padihash0.262MH/s41W0. 006MH/W

Pascal0.004GH/s—W—GH/W

Pawelhash4.254MH/s114W0.037MH/W

ProgPow11.545MH/s146W0.079MH/W

ProgPowSERO12.29MH/s114W0.108MH/W

ProgPowZ12.218MH/s117W0.104MH/W

Quark0.014GH/s109W0GH/W

Radiant187.56MH/s52W3.607MH/W

RandomKEVA455.98H/s103W4.427H/W

RandomSFX454.87H/s110W4.135H/W

RandomX557.7H/s113W4. 935H/W

SHA-256csm262.844MH/s46W5.714MH/W

ScryptSIPC678.422KH/s105W6.461KH/W

Skein0.478GH/s110W0.004GH/W

Skein2325.283MH/s145W2.243MH/W

Skunkhash17.472MH/s81W0.216MH/W

SonoA1.04MH/s137W0.008MH/W

Tellor0GH/s94W0GH/W

Tensority0.003KH/s115W0KH/W

TimeTravel1025.016MH/s130W0.192MH/W

Tribus75.147MH/s103W0. 73MH/W

Ubqhash25.489MH/s121W0.211MH/W

X11k1.262MH/s87W0.015MH/W

X136.588MH/s152W0.043MH/W

X156.733MH/s87W0.077MH/W

X16R10.796MH/s107W0.101MH/W

X16RT7.116MH/s127W0.056MH/W

X16RTVEIL6.524MH/s114W0.057MH/W

X16Rv219.203MH/s95W0.202MH/W

X16S17.153MH/s109W0.157MH/W

X177.123MH/s144W0.049MH/W

X17R6. 204MH/s93W0.067MH/W

X180.262MH/s43W0.006MH/W

X21S5.623MH/s51W0.11MH/W

X22i9.838MH/s139W0.071MH/W

X25X3.899MH/s140W0.028MH/W

X338.923MH/s113W0.079MH/W

Xevan2.968MH/s108W0.027MH/W

Zhash44H/s114W0.386H/W

cuckARoo24168.757H/s40W4.219H/W

cuckARoo294.667H/s108W0.043H/W

cuckARood293.11H/s133W0. 023H/W

cuckARoom292.23H/s140W0.016H/W

cuckARooz293H/s111W0.027H/W

cuckAToo310.587H/s83W0.007H/W

cuckAToo320.278H/s117W0.002H/W

vProgPow6.024MH/s146W0.041MH/W

AMD Radeon RX 590 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (mobile) comparison, which is better?

General information
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
55.8%	99.3% 43.5% (78%) better than
Architecture
GCN 4. 0	Pascal
Codename
Polaris 30	Pascal GP104 SLI
Type
Desktop	For laptops
Release price
279 $	n/a
Number of shaders
2304	4096 1792 (77.8%) better than
Core clock
1469MHz 26 MHz (1.8%) better than	1443 MHz
Boost frequency
1545 MHz	1645 MHz 100 MHz (6.5%) better than
Number of transistors
5.700 million	14400 million
Process
12 nm -4 nm (-25%) better than	16 nm
Interface
PCIe 3. 0 x16	n/a
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
175 W	n/a
Length
241 mm	n/a
Additional power connectors
1x 8-pin	n/a
G-SYNC Ready NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts.
Multi Monitor
n/a	+
SLI support
n/a	+
3D Vision
n/a	+
GPU Boost
n/a	+
GeForce Experience
n/a	+
VR Ready Technology from NVIDIA that gives manufacturers access to Multi res Shading, Context Priority, and GPU Direct virtual reality technologies.
no data	+
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.
n/a	+
CUDA The presence of the CUDA architecture allows the use of applications that are optimized for parallel computing. For example, for the development and design of neural networks.
Surround
n/a	+
Adaptive Vertical Sync
n/a	+
Multi-Projection NVIDIA’s Multi-Projection technology improves graphics card performance when building virtual worlds. Images for the left and right eyes are calculated simultaneously.
n/a	+
FreeSync
+	n/a
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
+	n/a
Video connectors
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	n/a
DirectX
12 (12_0)	DirectX 12_1

Memory
Memory type
GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, use high resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.
8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games.
256 bit	256 bit
Shared memory
—	—
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.
8000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use.
256	n/a

Comparison of AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of video cards AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 590

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD Radeon RX 590

• Newer graphics card, release dates difference 1 year(s) 905 month(s) 905 time(s) greater: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process for the video card allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• About 3% less power consumption: 175 Watt vs 180 Watt
• About 16% more performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 49863 vs 43009
• 16% more: 2083. 862 vs 1797.792
• 5.3 times more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark: 139.477 vs 26.444
• About 2% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames/s) benchmark more: 3716 vs 3638
• Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) about 2% more: 3716 vs 3638

Release date	15 November 2018 vs 2 November 2017
Texturing speed	222.48 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel/s
Process	12 nm vs 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt vs 180 Watt
Geekbench — OpenCL	49863 vs 43009
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2083.862 vs 1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	139.477 vs 26.444
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 3638
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3344
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 3638
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3344

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

• About 9% faster core clock: 1607 MHz vs 1469 MHz
• 9% faster core clock in Boost mode: 1683 MHz vs 1540 MHz
• Performance 1153 times larger floating point: 8,186 gflops vs 7. 1 TFLOPs
• Approximately 53% improvement in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 14682 vs 9614
• Approximately 9% improvement in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 882 vs 808
• Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Faceels Detection (mPixel Detection) benchmark s) about 32% more: 182.11 vs 137.469
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 14% more: 14.071 vs 12.353
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin (mHash) /s) about 36% more: 1035.984 vs 762.142
• About 21% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) benchmark: 16128 vs 13383
• About 21% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) benchmark: 16504 vs 13504
• Performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score about 43% better: 6798 vs 4754

Core Clock	1607 MHz vs 1469 MHz
Boost core clock	1683 MHz vs 1545 MHz
Floating point performance	8. 186 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs
Memory frequency	8008 MHz vs 8000 MHz
PassMark — G3D Mark	14682 vs 9614
PassMark — G2D Mark	882 vs 808
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	182.11 vs 137.469
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	14.071 vs 12.353
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1035.984 vs 762.142
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	16128 vs 13383
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	16128 vs 13383
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	6798 vs 4754

Benchmark comparison

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark — G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
PassMark — G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
Geekbench — OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	137.469 182.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2083.862 1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12. 353 14.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	139.477 26.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	762.142 1035. 984
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2

Name	AMD Radeon RX 590	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark — G3D Mark	9614	14682
PassMark — G2D Mark	808	882
Geekbench — OpenCL	49863	43009
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	137.469	182.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2083.862	1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	12.353	14.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	139.477	26.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	762.142	1035.984
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13383	16128
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3716	3638
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3344
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13383	16128
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3716	3638
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3344
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	4754	6798

Feature comparison

conveyors

	AMD Radeon RX 590	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Architecture	GCN 4. 0	Pascal
Codename	Polaris 30	GP104
Design	Radeon RX 500 Series
Production date	November 15, 2018	November 2, 2017
Price at first issue date	$279	$399
Place in the ranking	196	182
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Price now		$379. 99
Price/performance ratio (0-100)		44.74
Boost core clock	1545 MHz	1683 MHz
Number of Compute	36
Core frequency	1469 MHz	1607MHz
Floating point performance	7.1 TFLOPs	8.186 gflops
Process	12nm	16nm
Pixel fill rate	49. 54GP/s
Render output units	32
Stream Processors	2304
Texturing speed	222.48 GTexel/s	255.8 GTexel/s
Texture Units	144
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	180 Watt
Number of transistors	5,700 million	7,200 million
Number of shaders		2432
Video connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
G-SYNC support
Interface	PCIe 3. 0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	267mm
Additional power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Vulcan
Maximum memory size	8GB	8GB
Memory bandwidth	256 GB/s	256.