Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-rtx-2070-vs-geforce-rtx-2080%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3070
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i3
12100F
EPYC
7h22
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-rtx-2070-vs-geforce-rtx-2080%23memory-specs
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3070
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i3
12100F
EPYC
7h22
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Video card performance analysis by benchmarks: 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, PassMark — G2D Mark, PassMark — G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) , GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
versus
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Advantages
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
- VEALENTER DIFFERENT, Release 3 MONTH (S) 900
- Number
- About 17% less power consumption: 150 Watt vs 175 Watt
- About 12% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score: 10029vs 8934
- About 70% more GFXBench 4.
0 — Manhattan (Frames) performance: 6319 vs 3718 - About 70% more GFXBench 4.0 performance — Manhattan (Fps): 6319 vs 3718
- 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) about 71% more: 5714 vs 3350
- GFXBench 4.0 performance — T-Rex (Fps) about 71% more: 5714 vs 3350
GFXBenchbench performance
| 0040 | 29 January 2019 vs 17 October 2018 |
| Number of shaders | 2944 vs 2304 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 175 Watt |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 10029 vs 8934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 vs 22615 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
22622 vs 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 6319 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 6319 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 5714 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 5714 vs 3350 |
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- 2% faster core clock: 1410 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- 2% faster core clock in Boost mode: 1620 MHz vs 1590 MHz
- 17% faster memory clock: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Performance about 3% more in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 833 vs 812
- Performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark is about 7% more: 16142 vs 15107
| Core frequency | 1410 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Boost core clock | 1620 MHz vs 1590 MHz |
| Memory frequency | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 833 vs 812 |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 16142 vs 15107 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score |
|
|||
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 10029 | 8934 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 812 | 833 |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 15107 | 16142 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
22622 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 6319 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 6319 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 5714 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 5714 | 3350 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 85629 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
252.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3729.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.133 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 154.621 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1303.435 |
Performance comparison
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | Turing | ||||
| Codename | TU104 | TU106 | ||||
| Issue date | January 29, 2019 | October 17, 2018 | ||||
| Place in the ranking | 84 | 92 | ||||
| Price now | $699. 99 |
$499.99 | ||||
| Type | Laptop | Desktop | ||||
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 37.18 | 42.76 | ||||
| Price at first issue date | $499 | |||||
| Boost core clock | 1590MHz | 1620MHz | ||||
| Core frequency | 1380 MHz | 1410MHz | ||||
| Process | 12nm | 12nm | ||||
| Number of shaders | 2944 | 2304 | ||||
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 175 Watt | ||||
| Number of transistors | 13,600 million | 10,800 million | ||||
| Video connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | ||||
| Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 |
PCIe 3.0 x16 | ||||
| Length | 229mm | |||||
| Additional power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |||||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) | ||||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 | ||||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit | ||||
| Memory frequency | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz | ||||
| Memory type | GDDR6 |
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
|---|---|---|
| OpenGL | 4.
|