EVGA GeForce GTX 460 SuperClocked Review
NVIDIA graphics card review. Latest images, pricing and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 specs. Gaming GPU benchmarked against the biggest PC games like Fortnite, Minecraft and PUBG Should you buy this EVGA graphics card?
This NVIDIA graphics card features the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 processor. The processor, also known as the GPU, is the most important component in any graphics card. PCGameBenchmark rates processors by how many of the top 1,000 PC games the chip can run. This PC graphics card has a chip that can run 507 of the top 1000 games — so we give it a 50% rating.
Games that this graphics card can run include Overwatch.
For a full list of the games that this card will run and the chance to compare it to similar cards check our graphics card comparison — we have tracked 2 cards with a similar GPU and 1 of them are cheaper than this setup — no need to wait for a sale or Black Friday 2022 to get the best price on a card like this.
Check out best deals on cheap graphics cards and the latest deals on Amazon.
EVGA GeForce GTX 460 SuperClocked
PCGameBenchmark Rating: 26%
| Best Price: | $199.99 |
|---|
Check latest prices
Network N earns commission from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates and other programs.
EVGA GeForce GTX 460 SuperClocked Specs
GPU |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 |
|---|---|
Weight |
1.8 lb (816.47 g) |
Dimensions (L x W x H) |
20.83 cm x 3.81 cm x 11.18 cm 8.2 in x 1.5 in x 4.4 in |
Brand |
EVGA |
Model Number |
01G-P3-1363-KR |
| Best Price: | $199. 99 |
|---|
Check latest prices
Network N earns commission from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates and other programs.
EVGA GeForce GTX 460 SuperClocked PC Gaming Performance
This graphics card will run 260 of the top PC games. Use PCGameBenchmark’s Rate My PC service to test your current set up and set how it compares.
Can It Run GTA 5?
This EVGA graphics card doesn’t meet the recommended system requirements for GTA 5 but it can play the game with lowered settings.
Can It Run Fortnite?
This EVGA graphics card doesn’t meet the recommended system requirements for Fortnite but it can play the game with lowered settings.
Can It Run Apex Legends?
This EVGA graphics card doesn’t meet the recommended system requirements for Apex Legends but it can play the game with lowered settings.
EVGA GeForce GTX 460 SuperClocked Features
- SuperClocked 867 MHz Core Clock
- 1024MB GDDR5, Memory Clock = 4050MHz, Shader Clock = 1734 MHz, and Cuda Cores = 336
- Microsoft directX 11 support
- NVidia PhysX, NVidia PureVideo HD, NVidia 2-Way SLI Ready, NVidia 3D Vision Surround Ready, NVidia CUDA Technology
- Windows XP/Vista/7 Support
- OpenGL 4.
2 Support - Dual-Link HDCP Capable
- PCI Express 2.0 Support
EVGA GeForce GTX 460 SuperClocked DEALS — BEST prices
| Best Price: | $199.99 |
|---|
Check latest prices
Network N earns commission from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates and other programs.
Similar to EVGA GeForce GTX 460 SuperClocked
Here are a few other options…
HP 620881-Zh2
Rating: 26%
| $169.98 |
|
GeForce GTX 460 |
| — |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE: What is the difference?
36points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
28points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
54 facts in comparison
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE?
- 0.
16 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
0.91 TFLOPSvs0.75 TFLOPS - 1.65 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
9.45 GPixel/svs7.8 GPixel/s - 50MHz faster memory clock speed?
900MHzvs850MHz - 200MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
3600MHzvs3400MHz - 6.6 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
37.8 GTexels/svs31.2 GTexels/s - 6.2GB/s more memory bandwidth?
115.2GB/svs109GB/s - 48 more shading units?
336vs288 - 8 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
56vs48
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 460?
- 10W lower TDP?
150Wvs160W - Has an HDMI output?
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX110
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX130
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX150
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
AMD Radeon R7 260X
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
ATI Radeon HD 5870
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
MSI GeForce GT 710 2GB
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
MSI GeForce GT 1030 2G LP OC
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 (OEM)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
ATI Radeon HD 5870
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
Price comparison
User reviews
Performance
1.
GPU clock speed
675MHz
650MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.GPU turbo
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 460)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE)
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
3.pixel rate
9.45 GPixel/s
7.8 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
4.floating-point performance
0.91 TFLOPS
0.75 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
5.texture rate
37.8 GTexels/s
31.2 GTexels/s
The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
6.
GPU memory speed
900MHz
850MHz
The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.
7.shading units
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.
8.texture mapping units (TMUs)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
9.render output units (ROPs)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
1.effective memory speed
3600MHz
3400MHz
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory.
Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
115.2GB/s
109GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
256bit
256bit
A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.
5.version of GDDR memory
Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.
6.Supports ECC memory
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption.
It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
Features
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
2.OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
3.OpenCL version
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
4.Supports multi-display technology
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.
5.
load GPU temperature
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE)
A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.
7.Supports 3D
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance.
DLSS is only available on select games.
9.PassMark (G3D) result
This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.
Ports
1.has an HDMI output
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
2.HDMI ports
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 460)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE)
More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.
3.HDMI version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 460)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE)
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4.DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best graphics cards?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Specs, Price, and FPS in Games
| 0.75 GB | GDDR5 | 192-bit | 86.4 GB/s |
| Memory Size | Memory Type | Memory Bus | Memory Bandwidth |
|---|
Pixel Fillrate
9.45 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
37.8 GTexel/s
4%
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Palit nVIDIA GTX 460 Geforce 796MB Graphics Card
Buy on Amazon
£169.
98
In Stock
Same as Founder’s Edition
Updated 49 minutes ago
Processor
Resolution
Select game resolution
Graphics Settings
Select game graphics
Offset
…
Apply Offset
Value Rating
Performance Rating
Value per FPS
You will receive
… FPS
Alternatives for GeForce GTX 460
1080p, High
No alternatives — this is the best option
Specifications
| General | |
|---|---|
| Release Date | Jul 12th, 2010 |
| Generation | GeForce 400 |
| Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Power Connectors | None |
| Power Consumption | 160 W |
| Performance | |
|---|---|
| Base Clock Speed | 675 MHz |
| Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
| Pixel Fillrate | 9. 45 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fillrate | 37.8 GTexel/s |
| Memory | |
|---|---|
| Memory Size | 0.75 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s |
Builds Using NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
1080p, High
Find out which of the 2 GPUs performs better, view a side-by-side specification comparison.
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
£933.48
GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
£799.99
GeForce RTX 2060
£290.76
GeForce RTX 3050
£313.99
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
£933.48
Radeon RX 6950 XT
£937.65
GeForce RTX 2060
£290.76
Radeon RX 6600
£283.48
Radeon RX 6800 XT
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Radeon RX 6700 XT
£450.09
Radeon RX 6600
£283.48
Refine results to filter 325 graphics cards by performance, release date, price, and value.
Click on a GPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.
Found 325 GPUs.
Popularity
Graphics Card
Performance
GeForce RTX 3050
Release Date: Jan 4th, 2022
Performance Rating
£313.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6600
Release Date: Oct 13th, 2021
Performance Rating
£283.48 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3060
Release Date: Jan 12th, 2021
Performance Rating
£373.99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Release Date: Dec 1st, 2020
Performance Rating
£455 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Release Date: May 31st, 2021
Performance Rating
£649 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3070
Release Date: Sep 1st, 2020
Performance Rating
£595 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Release Date: May 31st, 2021
Performance Rating
£933.
48 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Release Date: Mar 3rd, 2021
Performance Rating
£450.09 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
Release Date: Jan 11th, 2022
Performance Rating
£799.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Release Date: Jan 19th, 2022
Performance Rating
£171.74 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 2060
Release Date: Jan 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
£290.76 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB
Release Date: Dec 7th, 2021
Performance Rating
£290.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Release Date: Oct 28th, 2020
Performance Rating
£624 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Release Date: Oct 29th, 2019
Performance Rating
£273.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6600 XT
Release Date: Jul 30th, 2021
Performance Rating
£380 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Release Date: Mar 10th, 2017
Performance Rating
£1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1070
Release Date: Jun 10th, 2016
Performance Rating
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
Release Date: Jan 12th, 2021
Performance Rating
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Release Date: Jan 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
£1,649.
99 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Release Date: Jul 9th, 2019
Performance Rating
£374.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Release Date: Oct 28th, 2020
Performance Rating
£786.11 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3080
Release Date: Sep 1st, 2020
Performance Rating
£783.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Radeon RX 580
Release Date: Apr 18th, 2017
Performance Rating
£600 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1080
Release Date: May 27th, 2016
Performance Rating
£1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Release Date: Jul 9th, 2019
Performance Rating
£1,327.48 on Amazon
In Stock
- Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- …
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 1GB Fermi Review
Verdict
Key Specifications
- Review Price: £200.
00
(centre)
The GTX 460 is the latest addition to Nvidia’s DirectX 11 compatible range of graphics cards. Aimed squarely at the mid-range of the market, it should be a great buy for those looking for a decent amount of bang for their buck. Let’s find out is it lives up to expectations.
Nvidia’s first set of DirectX 11 graphics cards didn’t exactly set the world alight. They were all based on a new architecture called Fermi and used a new chip based on that design, the GF100, that on paper looked very impressive. Unfortunately for Nvidia it didn’t quite live up to its billing. Heat, power consumption, and primarily manufacturing problems plagued the GTX 480 and GTX 470 and neither delivered the performance to justify these compromises. What’s more, Nvidia charged extortionate prices for them (£450+) when they first came out – it really wasn’t a good episode for the company.
A few months later it released the GTX 465, which used a heavily cut down (i.
e. bits disabled) version of GF100 that was meant as a stop gap to tackle the mid-range market. However, it also failed to deliver on all fronts.
Now Nvidia has finally released a card based on a brand new chip, designed from the ground up to be smaller and less powerful but that should deliver in terms of all the other aspects of a graphics card; heat, power consumption, noise, and pricing. That card is the GTX 460 and the chip it’s based on is dubbed the GF104.
We won’t cover the detailed inner workings of the Fermi architecture in this review (for that we refer you to our review of the GTX 470) but we will give you a brief overview of the differences between GF100 and GF104.
GF100 contains 512 Stream Processors (SP), or Cuda cores as Nvidia likes to call them, which are the main processing units of the chip. These are split up into sets of 32, in what’s called a Streaming Multiprocessor (SM). This also adds four texture units, some cache, thread schedulers, and the polymorph engine, which handles geometry processes like tesselation.
Four of these SMs are then clustered together to form a General Processing Cluster (GPC), which basically just adds a raster engine (the bit that converts 3D models into 2D pixels). Finally, four of these GPCs are added together along with further thread scheduling components, the host interface, memory controllers, ROPs (48 of them split into six sections), and 512KB of L2 cache. The result is one enormous and hot chip that contains a whopping 3.1bn transistors. However, due to production problems, the GTX 480, has one of the SMs disabled so you actually get 480 SPs, 15 SMs, and 60 texture units.
For GF104, all the basic building blocks are very similar, but their proportions have been tweaked. So, you get 384 SPs, split up between just eight SMs, giving you 48 SPs per SM. To deal with these extra SPs, each SM also has double the number of texture units. Each SP has also had a second dispatch port added for more efficient thread handling.
Finishing things off, GF104 has 32 ROPs, split up into four sections. The result is that despite at first glance looking like it is only half the chip that GF100 was, GF104 is considerably more than this – something that’s reflected in its transistor count of 1.95bn.
So we come to the cards that will actually be using the GF104 chip. Like the GTX 480, the new cards won’t actually use the full potential of the chips they’re based on. Instead, one of the SMs has been disabled. This is because the art of manufacturing these chips is a fine one and even the slightest defect can render a chip useless. As such, if Nvidia promised a full working chip, it would have problems producing them in enough numbers. By disabling the section of the chip that is defective, many more can still be used. This isn’t a problem unique to Nvidia, but it is obviously still suffering more from it than AMD/ATI as that company hasn’t had to resort to such measures.
There will also be two versions of the GTX 460, one with 1GB of RAM and one with 768MB.
The latter also has a reduced memory sub-system with the amount of L2 cache dropping from 512KB to 384KB and the number of ROPs from 32 to 24. We shall be taking a look at this version of the card shortly.
Today, then, we’re looking at the Zotac GeForce GTX 460 1GB, which uses a reference design and runs at standard clock speeds, unlike some cards on the market that come pre-overclocked. Nvidia hasn’t stipulated a stock cooler for the GTX 460 and has instead left it up to board partners to choose their own setups. As such there are a number of different variations on offer.
The card we’re looking at uses a radial fan sucking air in from the front of the card, blowing it across the heatsink and out the back of the card. Others use axial fans blowing straight down onto the card. Generally we prefer the approach Zotac has taken as these coolers exhaust the hot air straight out of your PC case. However, this particular design isn’t the quietest we’ve encountered with it idling at 48dB (measured from 30cm away) and rising to 53dB under load.
In contrast the stock (i.e. Nvidia designed) cooler on the GTX 470 runs at 40dB/50dB, while ATI’s competing cards also run at sub 40dB when idling. The Zotac card isn’t loud enough to disturb you if you’re just sitting working with some music on, say, but if you have your PC in your bedroom, it may be enough to keep you awake at night.
Otherwise, the Zotac design seems fine. It’s 218mm long, which is plenty short enough to fit in most cases, and you get oodles of video outputs, with two DVI, an HDMI and a DisplayPort on offer – more than any other card we’ve seen from Nvidia.
One thing we didn’t expect to see on a card that looks fairly small and unassuming is two six-pin PCI-E power connectors. The official TDP of the GTX 460 1GB is 160W, so it just creeps over the safe limit of using just one connector – it’ll be interesting to see how much headroom this leaves for overclocking. Another interesting thing to note is the presence of only one SLI connector along the top edge, which means you can ”only” run two of these together and not three.
In the box, along with the card, Zotac also bundles a copy of Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands, two twin-Molex to six-pin PCi-E connectors and a DVI to VGA adapter. Zotac also offers a competitive 5 year warranty on its cards. All told, we think it’s quite a compelling package. All that’s left to do know is see how the thing performs.
We have compared the GTX 460 1GB to the ATI Radeon HD 5850, ATI Radeon HD 5830, and the GTX 470, which are all priced around the same £200 mark. We use the same test bed that consists of an Asus P6T motherboard equipped with an Intel Core i7 965, 6GB Kingston DDR3 RAM, and a 2TB Seagate Barracuda XT hard drive.
Apart from Crysis, we run each game at its highest detail level and do manual run throughs recording frames per second using FRAPs. For Crysis we run a custom time demo and use the widely available Crysis benchmarking tool. We also run it at ”only” High detail settings, not Very High.
—-
—-
—-
For analysis of these results, navigate to the Analysis and Verdict page.
We record power consumption using a mains power meter, as such the results shown reflect the total system power. The idle figure shows the power consumption when the system is doing nothing except showing the Windows desktop while the under load figure is taken while performing a run through of our Crysis timedemo with settings of 1,920 x 1,200 with 2xAA.
Noise readings are taken with the entire system (except the power supply, and disk drives) enclosed in a sound reducing box. A decibel meter is then held 30 centimetres away from the card while all other components are passively cooled. Again, we measure when at the desktop and when running Crysis.
For analysis of these results, navigate to the Analysis and Verdict page.
We started out testing with that perennial graphics card torturer, Crysis.
Here the GTX 460 1GB puts in an impressive performance, easily providing playable framerates at 1,920 x 1,200 with 2xAA. It also comfortably beats its most direct rival, the HD 5830 and giving the more expensive HD 5850 and GTX 470 a run their money.
Moving onto a more modern title, Battlefield: Bad Company 2, and the GTX 460 looks even more impressive, opening up a comfortable lead over competing cards from ATI and maintaining playable framerates again at 1,920 x 1,200 with 4xAA. At a push you could probably even play at 30in monitor resolutions of 2,560 x 1,600.
It’s a complete role reversal when it comes to Just Cause 2. This title clearly favours ATI’s cards and the GTX 460 1GB loses out badly, struggling even to maintain playable framrates at 1,680 x 1,050.
Finishing up with Colin McCrae: DIRT 2, all cards on test could comfortably play at 1,920 x 1,200 with 4xAA, and you could again probably stretch to 2,560 x 1,600.
There’s not much in it between the cards either, but the GTX 460 does consistently stay ahead of ATI’s competing cards.
As for noise and power consumption, we’ve already mentioned this particular Zotac card isn’t the quietest but it’s still within the realms of acceptability. It also does well when it comes to power consumption, keeping toe to toe with ATI’s competing cards. Most notably, it’ clear the tweaks made to the GF104 chip have paid dividends as it consumes vastly less power than the GF100 powered GTX 470.
All told, then, the GTX 460 1GB is an impressive beast. On average throughout our tests, it performed better than ATI’s competing cards at this price range, it’s not too noisy and power consumption is as competitive as anything else. Once you factor in Nvidia’s exclusive extras like PhysX and 3D gaming, you have a clear winner in this sector.
”’Verdict”’
After the disaster that was the GTX 480 and GTX 470 launch, you’d be forgiven for thinking Nvidia was going to be left high and dry for this 1st round of DirectX 11 graphics cards.
However, the company has gone away, done its homework, and comeback with a seriously compelling mid-range graphics card in the shape of the GTX 460. It’s still a fair chunk of money at around £200 but for that money, it’s the best choice out there.
Score in detail
-
Value 9
-
Features 8
-
Performance 8
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 1GB review
Having tested the surprisingly poor GTX 465, we were about ready to give up on Nvidia’s new 400-series cards. Thankfully, we’re professionals and so we steeled ourselves to put this new GTX 460 through its paces – and were pleasantly surprised with the results.
Despite the similar names, the 465 is a cut down version of the high-end 470 and 480 cards, while the 460 is a wholly new design, and a far superior one at that. In fact, we can’t fathom why Nvidia released the GTX 465 when it did, with the GTX 460 appearing only weeks later, outperforming it and costing less.
One possible explanation is that Nvidia needed to shift 470 and 480 cards with faults in their processing cores. Even then it seems odd to release a card and then immediately undermine it with another.
The GTX 460 is a more compact card than its predecessors, measuring only 210mm in length. It still takes up two slots in your PC, but it’s far less intrusive in terms of both heat and noise, and this despite its higher clock speeds. There are two versions of the GTX 460, 1GB and 768MB, at present the 1GB version looks to be the better buy – though we’ll looking at both cards again next month in our components labs test. Both variants have two 6-pin PCI-Express power connectors.
This Zotac version of the 1GB model has a better provision of ports than the reference design – with the two DVI outputs being joined by a full-sized HDMI output (rather than Nvidia’s usual preference for the rarer mini HDMI) plus DisplayPort (for all three of you who have DP monitors). Multiple cards will work under SLI, you can only use a maximum of two cards, but this is more than sufficient for most users.
It has a core graphics speed of 675MHz, a significant step up from the GTX 465’s 607MHz. It does have less stream processors than the 465, but the reduction is minimal, dropping from 352 to 336. The 1GB version has the same 256-bit memory bus, so there’s no bottleneck there.
With a faster clock speed and almost the same number of processing cores, it’s no surprise that the GTX 460 outguns its larger sibling. In Full HD resolution with 4x anti-aliasing, the kind of settings we’d expect keen gamers to use, this card scored 66.7fps in Call of Duty 4 and 35.5fps in Crysis. These scores place above ATI’s HD 5830 and near those of the HD 5850, a card that costs around £30 more. In addition, this card performed well under DirectX 11 using the Stalker: Call of Pripyat benchmark.
In terms of extra features, Nvidia does have the edge over ATI at present. Its 3D Vision technology is long-established with lots of software support. In addition, its CUDA application acceleration is the only one supported by Adobe (great for Photoshop fans), plus there’s the company’s PhysX technology for better in game physics.
These won’t appeal to all, but one such feature may be key to you.
Graphics card prices are highly volatile, and we’re already seeing some reference GTX 460 1GB cards dropping as low as £180. This puts a significant gap between these and the Radeon HD 5850 at around £230. If you’re looking for a powerful new card then the GTX 460 should certainly be on your shortlist, though be sure to check the latest prices.
Basic Specifications |
|
|---|---|
| Price | £197 |
| Rating | ***** |
| Details | www.zotac.com |
| Interface | PCI Express x16 2.0 |
| Crossfire/SLI | SLI |
| Slots taken up | 2 |
| Brand | nVidia |
| Graphics Processor | Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 |
| Memory | 1GB GDDR5 |
| GPU clock speed | 675MHz |
| Memory speed | 900MHz |
Features |
|
| Architecture | 336 CUDA cores |
Connectors |
|
| DVI outputs | 2 |
| VGA outputs | 0 |
| S-video output | no |
| S-Video input | no |
| Composite outputs | no |
| Composite inputs | no |
| Component outputs | no |
| HDMI outputs | 1 |
| Power leads required | 2x 6-pin PCI Express |
Benchmark Results |
|
| 3DMark Vantage 1680 | 8,427 |
| Call of Duty 4 1680 4xAA | 69. 9fps |
| Call of Duty 4 1440 4xAA | 74.3fps |
| Crysis 1680 High 4xAA | 39.7fps |
| Crysis 1440 High 4xAA | 43.6fps |
Buying Information |
|
| Warranty | one-year RTB |
| Price | £197 |
| Supplier | http://www.eclipsecomputers.com |
| Details | www.zotac.com |
Galaxy GeForce GTX 460 Super OC 1GB Video Card
Video Cards & GPUs
NVIDIA GeForce GPU
Another day, another GTX 460. NVIDIA partners seem to love this model as much as us. Let’s check out the Super OC Galaxy one today.
Published Jul 15, 2010 9:49 AM CDT | Updated Tue, Nov 3 2020 7:02 PM CST
Manufacturer: Galaxy
16 minute read time
Introduction
It’s been a while since I’ve been this excited about a mid range video card. It’s crazy these days at what a mid range card is and even more so insane at what a mid range card is capable of doing.
A mid range card is ultimately based on the price of the model and not the performance it offers. The same is done with a high end card and for that reason we find that sometimes high end cards don’t deliver when you consider the price of the product. The same is seen in the mid range market as well.
It’s become clear that NVIDIA are delivering in the mid range market just by having a look at the GTX 460s we’ve already tested. NVIDIA seem to be offering high end performance at a mid range price level. For you, the consumer, there’s nothing better. We all love a good bang for buck and that seems to be what NVIDIA are delivering with the GTX 460.
The particular one we’re looking at today is the Galaxy version that comes in with the Super OC tag. While in the past I would be a little skeptical about a company outside of maybe GIGABYTE giving us the Super anything tag, there’s some serious OC potential with these cards with most companies offering a 700+MHz offering and Palit even offering us a 800MHz model.
So the question on our mind today is, how Super is the Super OC from Galaxy? — Before we get stuck into the card and more importantly its specifications, let’s first look at the package Galaxy has put together.
The Package
On the box we can see the Super OC labeling; we can also see that Galaxy are marketing a detachable fan. We saw something similar with the GTX 470 GC version; what it does is let you get behind the fan and give the card a good dust down, something that’s always appreciated.
There’s not too much going on in the bundle, but the inclusion of a mini-HDMI to HDMI cable is a stand-out as we haven’t seen any company yet include one in the GTX 460 package.
The Card and Specifications
The Card
Apart from the cooler design, we don’t really see anything we haven’t seen from other GTX 460s we’ve already looked at. There’s two 6-Pin PCI-E connectors at the top of the card like Palit’s instead of at the back.
We’ve also got a single SLI connector and connectivity is offered via two Dual-Link DVI connectors and a single Mini-HDMI port.
Where the Galaxy offering does differ to the others we’ve looked at is when it comes to the fan which can pivot back or completely detach to help clean up the heatsink from any dust. The whole thing is a little gimmicky, but we don’t mind it if the heatsink/fan does a good job of keeping our core nice and cool.
Specifications
I thought when we looked at the Palit Sonic Platinum GTX 460 that we wouldn’t see a company beat it when it comes to the out of the box overclock. Not only did Palit offer us an 800MHz core, but they also upped the ante on the memory by pushing it to 4000MHz QDR.
It seems that Galaxy has infiltrated the Palit bunker, though, as they’re offering us an 810MHz core which in turn bumps our Shader clock to 1620MHz. As for the 1GB of GDDR5, they’ve bumped that up from the default 3600MHz QDR clock to 4000MHz QDR.
While the Galaxy offering is only a small increase on the Palit 800MHz clock we saw earlier, it like the Palit offering is a massive increase over the default 675MHz clock which at the moment no one has shown us.
Test System Setup and 3DMark Vantage
We would like to thank the following companies for supplying and supporting us with our test system hardware and equipment: Intel, ASRock, Kingston, Western Digital, Noctua and Thermaltake.
Today we’ll have a look at the Galaxy GTX 460 1GB against the Palit Sonic Platinum which carries with it an 800MHz core and the GIGABYTE OC model which carries a much lower 715MHz core.
Because we can, we’ve also got the Gainward GTX 470 Golden Sample, GIGABYTE HD 5830 and Sapphire HD 5850 involved.
Let’s get started!
3DMark Vantage
Version and / or Patch Used: 1.
0.1
Developer Homepage: http://www.futuremark.com
Product Homepage: http://www.futuremark.com/products/3dmarkvantage/
Buy It Here
3DMark Vantage is the new industry standard PC gaming performance benchmark from Futuremark, newly designed for Windows Vista and DirectX10. It includes two new graphics tests, two new CPU tests, several new feature tests, and support for the latest hardware.
3DMark Vantage is based on a completely new rendering engine, developed specifically to take full advantage of DirectX10, the new graphics API from Microsoft.
Straight away we can see that the 10MHz edge that Galaxy has on the Palit offering gives us a few extra points in both the P and X preset.
Unigine Heaven Benchmark
Version and / or Patch Used: 1 and 2
Developer Homepage: http://www.unigine.com
Product Homepage: http://unigine.com/press-releases/091022-heaven_benchmark//
New benchmark grants the power to unleash the DirectX 11 potential in the gift wrapping of impressively towering graphics capabilities.
It reveals the enchanting magic of floating islands with a tiny village hidden in the cloudy skies. With the interactive mode emerging experience of exploring the intricate world is ensured within reach. Through its advanced renderer, Unigine is one of the first to set precedence in showcasing the art assets with tessellation, bringing compelling visual finesse, utilizing the technology to the full extend and exhibiting the possibilities of enriching 3D gaming.
Note: If a card doesn’t support DirectX 11 the benchmark will be left out, if it does it will be included along with the DirectX10 results.
We can see that across the board that extra 10MHz manages to give the Galaxy GTX 460 the lead over the Palit card. Compared to the GIGABYTE offering with a 715MHz core the Galaxy does really leave it for dead, which isn’t a surprise considering the core is clocked 95MHz higher.
Benchmarks — CINEBENCH
CINEBENCH
Version and / or Patch Used: Release 10 and Release 11.
5
Developer Homepage: http://www.maxon.net/
Product Homepage: http://www.maxon.net
CINEBENCH is a real-world test suite that assesses your computer’s performace capabilities. MAXON CINEBENCH is based on MAXON’s award-winning animation software, CINEMA 4D, which is used extensively by studios and production houses worldwide for 3D content creation. MAXON software has been used in blockbuster movies such as Spider-Man, Star Wars, The Chronicles of Narnia and many more.
MAXON CINEBENCH runs several tests on your computer to measure the performance of the main processor and the graphics card under real world circumstances. The benchmark application makes use of up to 16 CPUs or CPU cores and is available for Windows (32-bit and 64-Bit) and Macintosh (PPC and Intel-based).
It comes as no surprise that under CINEBENCH we see all the NVIDIA cards perform quite close to each other.
Benchmarks — Resident Evil 5
Resident Evil 5
Version and / or Patch Used: Demo Benchmark
Developer Homepage: www.
residentevil.com/
Product Homepage: http://www.residentevil.com/
Resident Evil 5 is a survival horror video game developed and published by Capcom. The game is the seventh installment in the Resident Evil survival horror series, and was released on September 18. Resident Evil 5 revolves around Chris Redfield and Sheva Alomar as they investigate a terrorist threat in Kijuju, a fictional town in Africa.
It’s interesting that even though the Galaxy offering carries with it only a 10MHz core higher than the Palit version, it’s still able to separate itself from pack.
Benchmarks — BattleForge
BattleForge
Version and / or Patch Used: Auto Patched at Load
Timedemo or Level Used: Built-in Test
Developer Homepage: http://www.battleforge.com/
Product Homepage: http://www.battleforge.com/
The Gods have disappeared and the old sun has died, letting a vile twilight engulf the world of Nyn.
In exchange for all treasures the mortals possessed, the evil giants agreed to forge a new sun and hurl it into the sky.
But the deal was betrayed, the treasure stolen and now the mortals flee the wrath of the giants. Under the light of a new sun the mortals stumble into a world changed and twisted by an age of twilight. The long journey home has become a conquest of survival.
Note: Supporting DirectX 11 we have seperated the graphs for NVIDIA and ATI cards. While the numbers between the two brands can be compared you have to make note that ATI based HD 5000 series cards are running DirectX 11.
A 10MHz core increase isn’t a lot, but you can again see that it’s just giving us an extra FPS across the board. Compared to the GIGABYTE version, though, which carries with it only a 715MHz core, the Galaxy really does stand out and at 1920 x 1200 the extra MHz is the difference between the game being playable and not.
Benchmarks — Tom Clancy’s H.
A.W.X.
Tom Clancy’s H.A.W.X.
Version and / or Patch Used: Benchmark Demo
Timedemo or Level Used: Built-in Test
Developer Homepage: http://www.ubi.com/UK/default.aspx
Product Homepage: http://www.hawxgame.com/
Tom Clancy’s H.A.W.X is an arcade-style flight simulator video game developed by Ubisoft Romania and published by Ubisoft for Microsoft Windows, Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, and iPhone OS.
The fundamental gameplay mechanics are similar to those of other console-based flight series. Players take on enemies with over 50 aircraft available. Each mission is at real world locations in environments created with commercial satellite data. A cockpit, first person, and third person view are selectable. The third person view gives the player an external view of both their plane and the target.
Set above the skies of a near-future world, increasingly dependent on private military companies with elite mercenaries who have a relaxed view on the law.
As these non-governmental organizations gain power, global conflict erupts with one powerful PMC attacking the United States.
At 1920 x 1200 and below that extra 10MHz core seems to do more for the frame rate then it does when at 2560 x 1600. We’ve seen in a few benchmarks at the highest resolution the gap between the 800MHz Palit and 810MHz Galaxy becomes quite small.
Benchmarks — Darkest of Days
Darkest of Days
Version and / or Patch Used: 1.4
Timedemo or Level Used: Built-in Test
Developer Homepage: http://www.darkestofdays.com/index.php
Product Homepage: http://www.darkestofdays.com/index.php
Darkest of Days takes the player through time into historic battles in an effort to save key individuals from certain death. The battles range from Custer’s Last Stand at the Battle of the Little Bighorn in 1876 to fighting in Pompeii as ash and fire rain down from an erupting Mt.
Vesuvius in 79 AD. Other locations include the battles of Antietam and Tannenberg, and a German World War II P.O.W. camp. There are different missions in every time period and the game takes about 4 hours to complete.
The game features over twenty weapons, both from the original time period as well as those brought back from the future. In addition, there are artillery weapons from different time periods to assist in battle.
Note: With the PhysX set to Medium or High Darkest of Days take advantage of the NVIDIA PhysX abilities. For that reason we will test ATI cards at the Low preset, NVIDIA based cards though will be tested at Low and High.
We continue to see that extra 10MHz on the core from the Galaxy Super OC version helping put the card ahead of the pack.
Benchmarks — Far Cry 2
Far Cry 2
Version and / or Patch Used: 1.01
Timedemo or Level Used: Ranch Long
Developer Homepage: http://www.
ubi.com/
Product Homepage: http://www.farcry2.com/
Buy It Here
The Dunia Engine was built specifically for Far Cry 2 by the award-winning Ubisoft Montreal development team. It delivers the most realistic destructible environments, amazing special effects such as dynamic fire propagation and storm effects, real-time night-and-day cycle, dynamic music system, non-scripted enemy A.I. and so much more.
We continue to see that thanks to that small 10MHz increase over the Sonic Platinum version from Palit the Galaxy offering is able to just take out the top spot across the board.
Benchmarks — Batman Arkham Asylum
Batman Arkham Asylum
Version and / or Patch Used: 1.1
Timedemo or Level Used: Built-in Test
Developer Homepage: http://www.batmanarkhamasylum.com/
Product Homepage: http://www.batmanarkhamasylum.
com/
Batman: Arkham Asylum exposes players to a unique, dark and atmospheric adventure that takes them to the depths of Arkham Asylum — Gotham’s psychiatric hospital for the criminally insane. Gamers will move in the shadows, instigate fear amongst their enemies and confront The Joker and Gotham City’s most notorious villains who have taken over the asylum.
Using a wide range of Batman’s gadgets and abilities, players will become the invisible predator and attempt to foil The Joker’s demented scheme.
Batman: Arkham Asylum features an original story penned exclusively for the game by famous Batman author and five-time Emmy award winner Paul Dini, whose credits include Lost season one and Batman: The Animated Series.
Note: With support for PhysX NVIDIA based cards will be tested with the technology on and off, ATI cards will be tested with the technology off due to it not being supported on their cards.
Without PhysX performance is as you would expect; strong.
Compared to the Palit minimums are almost identical with the average being slightly higher. With PhysX on we’re seeing the same kind of picture with again a slight bump in our averages.
Benchmarks — Dark Void
Dark Void
Version and / or Patch Used: Benchmark Demo
Timedemo or Level Used: Built-in Test
Developer Homepage: http://www.airtightgames.com
Product Homepage: http://www.darkvoidgame.com/
The game’s story takes place during World War II and centers around a cargo pilot named William Augustus Grey (voiced by Nolan North) who is teleported to another world while flying through the Bermuda Triangle. In this world, known as the ‘Void’, Will encounters an alien race as well as other humans, which are known as the Watchers and the Survivors respectively.
Will reluctantly joins the Survivors who are engaged in a feud with the alien race to satisfy his desire to return to Earth.
While aiding the Survivors, Will discovers that the Void is a middle ground that connects both the Watchers homeworld and Earth. It also becomes apparent that the Watchers are supplying the Axis powers with various supplies for reasons unknown. With the help of Nikola Tesla, Will utilizes retrofited Watcher technology to combat the Watchers and eventually find a way to escape the Void.
With both PhysX on and off we can see that the Galaxy offering is able to just offer those few extra FPS here and there thanks to that 10MHz increase on the core.
Benchmarks — High Quality AA and AF
High Quality AA and AF
Our high quality tests let us separate the men from the boys and the ladies from the girls. If the cards weren’t struggling before they will start to now.
Far Cry 2
We can see the extra core speed just helps boost our performance again slightly, which is impressive.
Resident Evil 5
That extra 10MHz helps boost our performance again and we’re so close to that 60 FPS average.
We’re not quite at it, but just a few more MHz and I think we would be there.
Tom Clancy’s H.A.W.X.
Unlike RE5, when we crank up the AA and AF under H.A.W.X. we fall a good way back from that 60 FPS average we need.
Benchmarks — Elcomsoft Wireless Security Auditor
Elcomsoft Wireless Security Auditor
Version and / or Patch Used: 1.51
Timedemo or Level Used: Sample File
Developer Homepage: http://www.elcomsoft.com/
Product Homepage: http://www.elcomsoft.com/ewsa.html
ElcomSoft has pioneered many software innovations that have made it easier to recover passwords protecting various types of resources. For the first time in the industry, the company’s patent-pending GPU acceleration makes its way into Wi-Fi password recovery, reducing the time required to recover Wi-Fi passwords up to a hundred times.
Supporting up to four NVIDIA boards such as GeForce 8, 9, and 200, as well as ATI video cards such as RADEON HD 4000 Series and up, Elcomsoft Wireless Security Auditor allows building servers with supercomputer performance at a fraction of the price.
Those few extra MHz on the core that Galaxy is putting on offer helps put the card ahead of the pack again when it comes to looking at WSA performance.
Benchmarks — Badaboom
Badaboom
Version and / or Patch Used: Release 1.2.1.7
Developer Homepage: http://www.nvidia.com//
Product Homepage: http://www.badaboomit.com/
Badaboom eliminates the frustration of video conversion by providing users with speed, efficiency, quality, and a sleek interface. In a practice that used to take several hours, Badaboom converts feature-length movies in a matter of minutes while keeping the videos looking crisp and clear.
By harnessing the power of NVIDIA CUDA-enabled GPUs, Badaboom offloads the CPU to allow users to continue browsing the Internet or checking email without decreased system performance, making transcoding high-quality video fast, easy, and painless.
Note: With the requirement for a CUDA enabled graphics card to run Badaboom, this means that we can only use NVIDIA based cards for this test.
Looking at video encoding performance, there’s nothing that surprises us here.
Temperature Test
Temperature Tests
With the TES 1326 Infrared Thermometer literally in hand we found ourselves getting real-world temperatures from the products we test at load (3D clock speeds).
There are two places we pull temperature from — the back of the card directly behind the core and if the card is dual slot and has an exhaust point we also pull a temperate from there, as seen in the picture.
The temperature of the core on the Galaxy offering is slightly lower than the 800MHz Sonic Platinum Palit offering.
Sound Test
Sound Tests
Pulling out the TES 1350A Sound Level Meter we find ourselves quickly yelling into the top of it to see how loud we can be.
After five minutes of that we get a bit more serious and place the device two CM away from the fan on the card to find the maximum noise level of the card when idle (2D mode) and in load (3D mode).
The Galaxy offering is a fair bit nosier than a lot of our other offerings. From the second we turned the system on we could tell it was more audible even at idle.
Power Consumption Tests
Using our new PROVA Power Analyzer WM-01 or «Power Thingy» as it has become quickly known as to our readers, we are now able to find out what kind of power is being used by our test system and the associated graphics cards installed. Keep in mind; it tests the complete system (minus LCD monitor, which is plugged directly into AC wall socket).
There are a few important notes to remember though; while our maximum power is taken in 3DMark06 at the same exact point, we have seen in particular tests the power being drawn as much as 10% more. We test at the exact same stage every time; therefore tests should be very consistent and accurate.
The other thing to remember is that our test system is bare minimum — only a 7,200RPM SATA-II single hard drive is used without CD ROM or many cooling fans.
So while the system might draw 400 watts in our test system, placing it into your own PC with a number of other items, the draw is going to be higher.
Power draw on the Galaxy model is slightly up in load and more noticeably up when idle. The numbers aren’t anything we would be too concerned about, though.
Total Performance Rating (TPR)
Total Performance Rating
The TPR graph is a combination of all our benchmarks in which NVIDIA and ATI are on an even playing field. This includes benchmarks where PhysX can be forced off like Dark Void and Batman: Arkham Asylum, but not Darkest of Days.
The TPR number is a combination of:
3DMark Vantage, Heaven Benchmark V2, CINEBENCH R11.5, Resident Evil 5, BattleForge, Tom Clancy’s H.A.W.X., Far Cry 2, Batman: Arkham Asylum (PhysX Off), Dark Void (PhysX Off) and our three High Quality tests which include Far Cry 2, Resident Evil 5 and Tom Clancy’s H.
A.W.X.
All of the benchmark results achieved are then combined into a single number. As this graph will grow over time and cards won’t be re-tested, next to each model you’ll find the driver version that was used when the card was benchmarked.
We can see that overall the Galaxy GTX 460 is now the fastest card we’ve tested to date. It doesn’t come as much of a surprise since we’re dealing with an 810MHz core. What’s scary, though, is that the card doesn’t sit all that far behind the GTX 470 Golden Sample from Gainward which comes pre-overclocked. This model really is a monster.
Total Value Rating (TVR)
Total Value Rating
The TVR graph is the TPR score divided by the price of the video card. The price of the video card is based on the list price of the model on Newegg.com. In the event the card isn’t listed, it will be based on the U.S. $ MSRP given to us by the manufacturer.
In the event we can’t source a price from either, the product will not receive a TVR rating.
As with our TPR graph, the amount of video cards on the list will grow over time and the price of the model won’t change from what it was when first reviewed. For this reason the U.S. $ price that the card is based off will be included next to the name of the model.
In the event you want to find the TVR rating yourself based on the current price, all you have to do is simply divide the TPR number by the list price.
TVR numbers are rounded to the nearest whole number; 100.3 will be 100; 100.8 will be 101 and 100.5 will be rounded down to 100.
It comes as no surprise that the Galaxy GTX 460 Super OC carries with it a higher price tag than the standard and lower clocked GTX 460s we’ve looked at, but thanks to the massive performance increase the product has excellent value still.
Final Thoughts
First the bad; the cooler is a little loud for my liking and while we’re dealing with more high end performance, it’s still a mid range card. Now for the good.
Well, that’s easy; everything else! — Performance on the model is stronger than the strongest we’ve seen and really, performance isn’t all that far away from a GTX 470 which costs significantly more.
Priced at $255 as well, it’s aggressive and while you’re paying a premium for the overclock, the bottom line is the huge overclock does wonders for performance. The cooler while being a bit loud is pretty good. It keeps the temps at a good level and honestly, the ability to move it back to get access to the heatsink without voiding warranty is a nice little feature. It’s exceptionally handy for systems that get very dusty or for people who just like to keep their system fairly dust free.
It’s nice to see that Galaxy have chosen to include a Mini-HDMI to HDMI cable and not just adapter. It ultimately helps the package stand out a little more when compared to some of the other cards we’ve looked at.
Galaxy has as always done a great job; I think the fact that they’re a NVIDIA only partner means that when it comes to building NVIDIA cards they want to aim to be the best while making sure pricing is still aggressive.
I think because of that drive we’re seeing great models from them. The GTX 460 Super OC doesn’t disappoint and the Super OC name is very well deserved.
If we dealt with boxes, the Galaxy GTX 460 Super OC would tick all of them; it’s a stand out compared to the cards that over clock in the 700MHz range which while impressive just aren’t the same as these ones that come in at the 800MHz range.
The biggest clocks to date, the decision to overclock the memory, inclusion of the Mini-HDMI to HDMI cable and the cool heatsink/fan design make the model stand out from the competition. The fan could’ve been a little quieter and you could drop it manually down a bit when just working in Windows, but really, we’re just trying to find something wrong at this point.
This is a stand out GTX 460 and just a stand out video card in general. Parting with your hard earned dollars on this card shouldn’t be hard as Galaxy has laid everything on the table and we’re just lapping it up.
Shopping Information
PRICING: You can find products similar to this one for sale below.
United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon.com
United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon.co.uk
Australia: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon.com.au
Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon.ca
Deutschland: Finde andere Technik- und Computerprodukte wie dieses auf Amazon.de
Shawn Baker
Shawn takes care of all of our video card reviews. From 2009, Shawn is also taking care of our memory reviews, and from May 2011, Shawn also takes care of our CPU, chipset and motherboard reviews. As of December 2011, Shawn is based out of Taipei, Taiwan.
0027
9.45 GPixel/s vs 7.8 GPixel/s
900MHz vs 850MHz
3600MHz vs 3400MHz
6 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? more memory bandwidth? 115.2GB/s vs 109GB/s
336 vs 288
56 vs 48
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 460?
- 10W below TDP?
150W vs 160W - Does it have HDMI output?
What are the most popular comparisons?
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX110
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX130
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
VS
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 550 Ti
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 460
VS
NVIDIA GEFORCE MX150
NVIDIA GTX 460 SE
9000 9505039
NVIDIA GEFIR0003
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
AMD Radeon R7 260X
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE 003
ATI Radeon HD 5870
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
vs
MSI GeForce GT 710 2GB
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
vs
MSI GEFORCE GT 1030 2G LP OC
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 460 SE
VS
NVIDIA GEFORCE GT 520 (OEM)
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 460 9000 GTX GD 5870 9000 9000 NVIDIA HDEN HDEN HDEN HDEN HDEN HDEN HDEN HDEN HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEON HDEN0003
VS
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 750
Complexation of prices
Users reviews
performance
1.
TECTION FECTION of GP
675MHz
650MHz
GPU (GPU) has a higher bunny.
2.turbo GPU
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 460)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE)
When the GPU is running below its limits, it may jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
3.pixel rate
9.45 GPixel/s
7.8 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
4.flops
0.91 TFLOPS
0.75 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.
5. texture size
37.8 GTexels/s
31.2 GTexels/s
The number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
900MHz
850MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
7.shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
8.textured units (TMUs)
TMUs take textured units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
9 ROPs
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
1.memory effective speed
3600MHz
3400MHz
The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
2.
max memory bandwidth
115.2GB/s
109GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
256bit
256bit
Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
5.versions of GDDR memory
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.
6. Supports memory debug code
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption.
It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Functions
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
2nd version of OpenGL
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version 3.
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
4. Supports multi-monitor technology
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
5.
GPU temperature at boot
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE)
Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
7. Supports 3D
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance.
DLSS is only available in some games.
9. PassMark result (G3D)
This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.
Ports
1.has HDMI output
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.
2.HDMI connectors
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 460)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE)
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.
HDMI version 3
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 460)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 SE)
New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.
4. DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using mini DisplayPort.
Price Match
Cancel
Which graphics cards are better?
review of characteristics and performance tests in games
The GeForce GTX 460 v2 video card was released by NVIDIA, release date: 24 September 2011. At the time of release, the video card cost $199. The video card is designed for desktop computers and is based on the Fermi 2.0 architecture, codenamed GF114.
Core frequency — 778 MHz. Texturing speed — 43.6 GTexel / s. Number of shader processors — 336. Floating point performance — 1,045.6 gflops. Technological process — 40 nm. The number of transistors is 1,950 million. Power consumption (TDP) — 160 Watt.
Memory type: GDDR5. The maximum memory size is 1 GB. Memory bus width — 192 Bit. Memory frequency — 4008 MHz. The memory bandwidth is 96.2 GB / s.
Benchmarks
| PassMark G3D Mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark G2D Mark |
|
|||||
| Geekbench OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop Face Detection |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Ocean Surface Simulation |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Video Composition |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
951 Frames/s 
212 mHash/s 
000 Fps | Name | Meaning |
|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 1990 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 482 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 7872 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection |
22.161 mPixels/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation | 781.734 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex | 2.125 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition | 47.218 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining | 75.212 mHash/s |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen | 3537 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 3398 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 3117 Frames |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen |
3537.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 3398.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 3117.000 Fps |
Features
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 |
| Codename | GF114 |
| Production date | 24 September 2011 |
| Price at first issue date | $199 |
| Place in the ranking | 673 |
| Price now | $199.99 |
| Type | Desktop |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 15. 01 |
| Core clock | 778MHz |
| Floating point performance | 1,045.6 gflops |
| Process | 40nm |
| Number of shaders | 336 |
| Texturing speed | 43.6 GTexel/s |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt |
| Number of transistors | 1,950 million |
| Video connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Interface | PCIe 2. 0 x16 |
| Length | 210 mm |
| Additional power connectors | 2x 6-pin |
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 |
| Maximum memory size | 1GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit |
| Memory frequency | 4008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose your graphics card
Compare graphics cards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 with other graphics cards
NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 460 v2
versus
NVIDIA
GeForce 6800 GT
NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 460 v2
versus
ATI
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 460 v2
versus
NVIDIA
GeForce GTS 160M
NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 460 v2
versus
NVIDIA
Tesla K20c
NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 460 v2
versus
NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 780M
NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 460 v2
versus
NVIDIA
Quadro K5100M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 — 29 secret facts, review, specifications, reviews.
Top specifications and features
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU benchmark score
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU benchmark score
- 3DMark Vantage Performance test score
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460:
1902
Best score:
Memory
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460:
229
Best score:
General Information
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460:
518
Best score:
Functions
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460:
156
Best score:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460:
1027
Best score:
Description
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 graphics card based on Fermi architecture has 1950 million transistors, tech.
40 nm process. The frequency of the graphics core is 675 MHz. In terms of memory, 0.768 GB is installed here. DDR5, 900 MHz frequency and with a maximum bandwidth of 86.4 Gb / s. FLOPS is 888.1. At the same time, the maximum number of points for today is 260261 points. According to the 3DMark benchmark, the video card scored 2050 points out of 49575 possible.
Directx version — 12. OpenGL version — 4.6. Regarding cooling, here the heat dissipation requirement is 160 watts.
In our tests, the video card scores 6668 points.
Why NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 is better than others
No merits
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU benchmark score 17237 . This parameter is lower than 30%
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU benchmark score 130441 . This setting is lower than 25%
- 3DMark Vantage Performance Score 12017 . This parameter is lower than that of 26%
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score 2755 . This parameter is lower than 33%
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics 2050 test score.
This parameter is lower than 41% - 3DMark Fire Strike Score 1864 . This setting is lower than 31%
- Base GPU clock speed 675 MHz. This parameter is lower than that of 63%
- RAM 0.768 GB. This parameter is lower than that of 66%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Review
Performance
Memory
general information
Functions
Ports
Tests in benchmarks
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Review Highlights
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
675MHz
max 2457
Average: 938 MHz
2457MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
900MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326.
6 MHz
16000MHz
FLOPS
A measure of the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
888.1TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 92.5 TFLOPS
1142.32TFLOPS
Architecture name
Fermi
GPU Name
GF104
Memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
86.4GB/s
max 2656
Average: 198.3 GB/s
2656GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency.
The higher it is, the better.
Show all
1800MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
19500MHz
RAM
0.768GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
128GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates for improved overall performance
Show in full
5
Average: 4.5
6
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus indicates that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all
192bit
max 8192
Average: 290.
1bit
8192bit
Thermal Dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
160W
Average: 140.4W
2W
Manufacturing process
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
40 nm
Average: 47.5 nm
4 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
1950 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
80000 million
Purpose
Desktop
DirectX
Used in demanding games providing enhanced graphics
12
max 12.
2
Average: 11.1
12.2
OpenCL version
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
1.1
max 4.6
Average: 1.7
4.6
opengl version
Later versions provide quality game graphics
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4
4.6
Shader model version
5.1
max 6.6
Average: 5.5
6.6
CUDA version
2.1
Has HDMI output
HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini-HDMI ports.
They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Show all
Yes
DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI
2
Mean: 1.4
3
HDMI
Yes
3DMark Cloud Gate test score GPU
17237
max 1
Average: 80042.3
1
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1864
max 38276
Average: 12463
38276
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
2050
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
49575
3DMark 11 Performance GPU score
2755
max 57937
Average: 18799.
9
57937
3DMark Vantage Performance Score
12017
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
97887
3DMark Ice Storm GPU score
130441
max 533357
Average: 372425.7
533357
FAQ
How much RAM does NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 have
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 has 0.768 GB.
What version of RAM does the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 9 have?1640
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 supports GDDR5.
What is the architecture of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
Fermi.
How many watts does an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 consume
160 watts.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 FLOPS
888.1 TFLOPs.
Which version of DirectX does NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 support
DirectX 12.
Does NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 support DVI
2 DVI ports.
Does NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 support CUDA?
2.1.
leave your feedback
Nvidia Geforce GTX 460 768/1024 MB
The gigabyte version of the GeForce GTX 460
is perhaps the most successful model in the entire 400th line
NVIDIA
: it doesn’t show very good performance records, but it doesn’t show performance records very well. The video card is no longer young, but still relevant, so when
Gainward GeForce GTX 460 GS 1 GB
, an alternative version of the GTX 460, we decided to give it a quick test and see if the engineers managed to make an already good card even better.
⇡#Gainward GeForce GTX 460 1 GB GLH
Gainward GeForce GTX 460 1 GB GLH is packaged in a large cardboard box with a matte finish. The front side of the package contains information about the main features of the accelerator, such as support for DirectX 11, NVIDIA 3DVision Surround technologies, PhysX, etc.
In addition, there are also several logos here, indicating that we have an exclusive product made on the board of Gainward’s own design and operating at increased clock frequencies.
On the back of the package, the manufacturer describes in some detail the main technological advantages of the video card. In particular, they talk about the quality of special effects in games that support PhysX, as well as about the new features of DirectX 11.
Opening the box. The Gainward GeForce GTX 460 1 GB GLH graphics card, along with the accessories included in the kit, is located in the central compartment. All other blocks are empty and serve rather to protect the video card from possible damage during transportation.
The delivery set consists of instructions for a quick installation of a video card, a disk with drivers, a power adapter from two Molex to PCI-Ex connectors. We especially note the presence of a coupon for a 25% discount when buying software that allows you to encode video using NVIDIA CUDA technology.
The Gainward GeForce GTX 460 GLH accelerator is based on our own design. The cooling system also differs from the reference.
Gainward engineers placed four connectors on the terminal panel: HDMI, D-Sub and 2 x DVI. This is quite enough for most users, but, in our opinion, it would be nice to replace the obsolete D-Sub with DisplayPort.
Removing the Gainward GeForce GTX 460 GLH cooling system does not take long. There are two heatsinks under the CO plastic casing, one of which contacts the elements of the power system through a special thermal pad, and the other, at the base of which two heat pipes are soldered, is designed to remove heat from the GPU.
The Gainward GeForce GTX 460 GLH video card, as we mentioned above, operates at higher clock frequencies than the nominal, which are 800/1600/4000 MHz for the graphics core, shader domain and video memory, respectively.
Eight GDDR5 memory chips are installed on the board, which gives a total of 1024 MB of video memory.
The chips are manufactured by Samsung and are marked K4G10325FE-HC05. Their access time is 0.5 ns and the nominal frequency is 1000 MHz (4000 MHz QDR). At this frequency, the video memory on the Gainward GeForce GTX 460 1 GB GLH card functions. The width of the video memory bus is 256 bits.
ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 1 GB
Now let’s talk about the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 video card.
The package design of the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 1 GB has not changed much compared to the previous series. This is a tower box made of glossy cardboard. On the front side there is a slot through which the casing of the cooling system is visible. Unlike other manufacturers, ZOTAC pays great attention to detailed product specifications in the packaging of its graphics cards. So, the side of the box contains information about the operating frequencies of the accelerator, which, by the way, do not differ from those recommended by NVIDIA by a single megahertz.
ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 1 GB package includes:
- user manual
- quick installation instructions for the video card
- brochure with a brief description of the features of various multimedia software
- two power adapters from Molex to PCI 9027 9027 adapter 9027 DVI/D-Sub (VGA)
- disc with drivers and applications
- disc with Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands
not yet purchased, but at the same time it will help to demonstrate all the capabilities of the video card, as they say, right out of the box.
It should be noted that we have not seen games in the configuration of even top-end video cards for a long time, and here the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 1 GB is a pleasant exception.
The cooling system of the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 1 GB video card differs from the standard NVIDIA CO, which, however, does not make the appearance of this video card less attractive. The black and gold sticker with the manufacturer’s logo goes well with the black PCB and CO housing, as well as with the yellow connectors on the terminal panel.
The ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 1 GB video card is equipped with four video outputs — HDMI, DisplayPort and a pair of DVI. In our opinion, this solution is more relevant today than the version used by Gainward. However, do not forget that when using one GeForce GTX 2xx / 4xx series video card, you can only output an image to two devices at the same time.
We dismantle the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 1 GB cooling system. The CO design is different from what we saw on the Gainward accelerator.
In the case of the ZOTAC cooler, the power subsystem is not equipped with any heatsinks, and the turbine located in the rear part of the cooler is responsible for its cooling. The air flow forced by the turbine passes through the radiator fins, taking heat from the GPU, and is discharged outside the system unit through special ventilation holes.
The heatsink cooling the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 1 GB GPU is somewhat different from the one used in the cooling system of the Gainward GeForce GTX 460 1 GB GLH accelerator. Here, not two, but three heat pipes, which work using direct contact technology, are responsible for removing heat from the GPU. At the same time, the radiator itself is somewhat shorter and thicker than that of the Gainward product.
The ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 1 GB is based on the NVIDIA reference design PCB, and only the part located next to the graphics card output panel has been changed. This is due to changes in the layout of the video outputs. Note that all video cards of the GeForce GTX 460 series are equipped with only one SLI connector, which automatically makes it impossible to assemble a 3-Way SLI configuration. However, such configurations are the lot of top solutions, and for middle-class video cards the absence of such an opportunity is not critical.
⇡# Temperature conditions
For comparison, in the diagrams below we also show the results of other test participants.
Thanks to advanced power-saving features, in office mode, the temperature of the GPU on the GeForce GTX 460 turned out to be significantly lower than that of the GTX 470. And even more — the representatives of the «red camp» were also put to shame. Apparently, the fact that the frequencies of the GTX 460 are reset to 51/101/270 MHz played a role, while the «red» GPU frequency in this mode is 3 times higher — 157/300 MHz. The speed of the GTX 460 cooler in this mode was 40% of the maximum. But if you can bring down the temperature of the GPU due to an efficient heatsink and high cooler speeds, then such tricks will not work with power consumption.
However, here everything is fine with the novelty — the stand with the GeForce GTX 460 video card installed in it consumes the same amount as with competitors from the red camp, known for their efficiency. Well, the progress compared to the GeForce GTX 470 does not need comments.
In the game Far Cry 2, the novelty also shows its best side. The temperature of the GPU, even when overclocking the GeForce GTX 460, does not exceed 70 ° C, while the cooler spins at a speed of 48% of the maximum.
However, when a load appears, almost 2 billion GF104 transistors make themselves felt. The power consumption of the test bench with the GeForce GTX 460 under these conditions is slightly higher than when using representatives of the Radeon HD 58xx family, but not much. Against this background, you can clearly see how gluttonous video cards based on the GF100 are — almost 100 W difference.
At the maximum load created by the FurMark test, the GeForce GTX 460 is again in the lead in terms of GPU temperature, which even when overclocked does not exceed 75 ° C. At the same time, the cooler rotation speed is only 56% of the maximum. Note that against the background of a processor cooler cooling an Intel Core i7 870 overclocked to 4 GHz in such an abnormal heat, it is completely inaudible.
Power consumption of the GeForce GTX 460 in such extreme conditions is also all right. In general, the test bench consumes no more than 300 W even when overclocking the new product, which looks like a very decent figure against the background of a similar configuration using Radeon HD 58xx video cards in normal mode. Note that for computers with the GeForce GTX 460, NVIDIA recommends using at least 450W power supplies. As tests show, this is more than enough even with an overclocked Intel Core i7 870 processor. Recall that the diagrams show power indicators measured “before” the power supply, but there is less real power consumed by the test bench (depends on the efficiency of the power supply, roughly can be multiplied by 0.8).
As you can see, with GPU temperatures and power consumption, the new product is, in general, all right. Now let’s see how it will show itself in terms of performance.
⇡#Power subsystem
We deliberately did not describe separately the power subsystem of Gainward GeForce GTX 460 1 GB GLH and ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 1 GB, as they have a lot in common. So, the power subsystem of both video cards is made according to the 3 + 1 scheme (three power phases for the GPU and one for the video memory), the On Semi NCP539 chip is used as a VGPU controller on both boards5, but the video memory power controllers are installed differently. On the Gainward card it is Richtek KE9259, and on the ZOTAC card it is Anpec Electronics APW7165.
Technological progress in relation to video cards is not only a transition to a new process technology, an increase in clock frequencies and large amounts of video memory. Along with the improvement in performance, the dimensions of the accelerator, as well as its power consumption, as a rule, become smaller. The photo above shows three video cards. Above is the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 260 AMP! based on the reference design, just below it is the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 1 GB, and finally, at the very bottom, the Gainward GeForce GTX 460 1 GB GLH, which, thanks to a proprietary PCB, turned out to be the smallest one shown in the photo. If we compare the dimensions of the ZOTAC and Gainward video cards with the reference version of the Radeon HD 5770, then the length of the ZOTAC card is exactly the same, and the Gainward accelerator is slightly shorter. 920×1200/ 1680×1050 4xAA/AF
Overclocking
Overclocking modern graphics accelerators is fairly easy, unless of course your goal is to conquer the world record in 3DMark Vantage. In our laboratory, we present the results of testing an overclocked accelerator only if it is absolutely stable in all tests at the frequencies we have chosen. To overclock Gainward GeForce GTX 460 1 GB GLH and ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 1 GB we used MSI Afterburner version 1.6.1.
The Gainward GeForce GTX 460 1 GB GLH worked stably at 880/1760/4000 MHz, while its ZOTAC colleague managed only 850/1700/4000 MHz. To ensure stability at such frequencies, we raised the maximum voltage on the GPU to 1.0 V, while the rotation speed of the coolers was set to maximum.
Specifications Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
GPU
| GPU manufacturer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32 -by | 64 -by |
File size:
400.00 MB version of the driver: 391.35 (WhQL) dated 27.03.2018; Language: Russian Operating system: Windows 10 32/64-bit, Windows 7 32/64-bit, Windows 8. 1 32/64-bit, Windows 8 32/64-bit, Windows Vista
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE — overview. Benchmarks and specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE (GPU) is ranked 405 in our performance ranking. Manufacturer: NVIDIA. Runs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE with a minimum clock speed of 650 MHz. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or during overclocking. The RAM size is 1 GB GB with a clock speed of 1700 MHz and a bandwidth of 108.8 GB/s.
The power consumption of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE is 150 Watt and the process technology is only 40 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.
Let’s take a closer look at the most important features of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE. To have an idea of which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service.
3.6
From 7
Hitesti Grade
Popular video cards
Most viewed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 600
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel HD Graphics 530
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 520
Buy here:
AliExpress
General information
The base set of information will help you find out the release date of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE graphics card and its intended use (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost. This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.
| Performance Rating Position: | 472 | |||
| Value for money: | 13.80 | |||
| Architecture: | Fermi | |||
| Code name: | GF104 | |||
| Type: | Desktop | |||
| Release date: | November 15, 2010 (11 years ago) | |||
| Starting price: | $160 | |||
| Current price: | $350 (2.2x MSRP) | |||
| Value for money: | 0.96 | |||
| GPU Code Name: | GF104 | |||
| Market segment: | Desktop | |||
Specifications
This is important information that determines all the performance characteristics of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE graphics card. The smaller the technological process of manufacturing a chip, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining).
| Conveyors: | 288 | |||
| Core Clock: | 650MHz | |||
| Number of transistors: | 1,950 million | |||
| Process: | 40nm | |||
| Power consumption (TDP): | 150 Watt | |||
| Number of texels processed in 1 second: | 31.2 billion/sec | |||
| Floating point: | 748.8 gflops | |||
| Maximum temperature: | 104 °C | |||
| CUDA Cores: | 288 | |||
| Pipelines / CUDA cores: | 288 | |||
| Number of transistors: | 1,950 million | |||
| Estimated heat output: | 150 Watt | |||
Dimensions, connectors and compatibility
Today, there are many form factors of PC cases and laptop sizes, so it is extremely important to know the length of the video card and its connection types (except for laptop options). This will help make the upgrade process easier, as Not all cases can accommodate modern video cards.
| Interface: | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |||
| Length: | 8.25″ (210 mm) (21 cm) | |||
| Additional power: | 6-pin & 6-pin | |||
| SLI options: | + | |||
| Tire support: | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |||
| Height: | 4.376″ (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |||
Memory (frequency and overclocking)
The internal memory is used to store data when performing calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE + turbo overclocking option.
| Memory type: | GDDR5 | |||
| Maximum RAM amount: | 1GB | |||
| Memory bus width: | 256 Bit | |||
| Memory frequency: | 1700MHz | |||
| Memory bandwidth: | 108.8 GB/s | |||
Port and display support
As a rule, all modern video cards have several types of connections and additional ports, for example HDMI and DVI . Knowing these features is very important in order to avoid problems connecting a video card to a monitor or other peripherals.
| Display connections: | 2 x Dual-Link DVI-I1 x Mini HDMI | |||
| Multi monitor support: | + | |||
| Maximum VGA resolution: | 2048×1536 | |||
| Audio input for HDMI: | Internal | |||
| HDMI: | + | |||
| Number of display connectors: | 2 | |||
Technologies
Each graphics card manufacturer complements its products with proprietary technologies that are used both in games and in the workflow. Below is a list of features that will be useful to you.
| 3D Vision: | + | |||
| CUDA: | + | |||
| Surround: | + | |||
| DSR: | + | |||
API Support
All APIs supported by the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE graphics card are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.
| DirectX: | 12 (11_0) | |||
| OpenGL: | 4.1 | |||
Overall gaming performance
All tests are based on FPS. Let’s take a look at where the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE ranks in the gaming performance test (the calculation was made in accordance with the recommendations of the game developer for system requirements; it may differ from real situations).
Select games
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Survival 2Middle-earth:8 Shadow of WarFIFA EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind Divid edMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Border 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysi s — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5 GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
| Description | |
| 5 | Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. |
| May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. | |
| 30 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25 fps or more |
| 40 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 35 fps or more |
| 60 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 58 fps or more |
| May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. |
|
| ? | Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene. |
| Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category. | |
| The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value. | |
AMD equivalent
AMD Radeon RX 570X
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE in benchmark results
Benchmarks help determine performance in standard tests of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE. We have compiled a list of the most famous benchmarks in the world so that you can get accurate results for each of them (see description). Pre-testing the graphics card is especially important when there are high loads, so that the user can see how the graphics processor copes with calculations and data processing.
Overall performance in benchmarks
NVIDIA GeForce MX230
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Passmark is an excellent benchmark that is updated regularly and shows relevant graphics card performance information.
NVIDIA GeForce MX230
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
AMD Radeon RX 570X
NVIDIA GeForce MX130
3.6
From 7
Hitesti Grade
Share on social networks:
You need to log in to leave a review
AMD Radeon RX 550
AMD Radeon Pro 555X
AMD Radeon RX 570X
AMD Radeon R9270X
AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Radeon HD 6770 Green Edition
AMD Baffin
ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon HD 7990
AMD Cayman