GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti : Which one is better?
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960’s Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 285W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti’s Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 122% (2610MHz vs 1178MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504. 2GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
Benchmark
Blender
GeForce GTX 960
181
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
+3965%
7359
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 960
46
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
+1430%
704
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960
2.413 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
+1561%
40.09 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
GeForce GTX 960
0.
075 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
+734%
0.626 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 960
2280
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
+897%
22751
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p
GeForce GTX 960
10
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
+900%
100
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p
GeForce GTX 960
25
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
+640%
185
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p
GeForce GTX 960
35
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
+571%
235
GeForce GTX 960
VS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
AD104
GM206-300-A1
GPU Variant
AD104-400-A1
Maxwell 2.
0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
2,940 million
Transistors
35,800 million
228mm²
Die Size
295mm²
Graphics Card
Jan 2015
Release Date
Jan 2023
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.
0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1127MHz
Base Clock
2310MHz
1178MHz
Boost Clock
2610MHz
1753MHz
Memory Clock
1313MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
112.
2 GB/s
Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
Render Config
1024
Shading Units
7680
64
240
-
SM Count
60
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024KB
L2 Cache
48MB
Theoretical Performance
37.
70 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
208.8 GPixel/s
75.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
626.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
40.09 TFLOPS
2.413 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.09 TFLOPS
75.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
626.
4 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
285W
300W
Suggested PSU
600W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.
6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
2
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs
AMD Radeon HD 6510
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs
AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
© 2023 — TopCPU.
net
Contact Us
GTX 960 vs 1050 Ti
antalyalii
Picopat
-
-
#1
Arkadaşlar iyi sosyaller son defa ekran kartı önerisi için konu açıyorum bir daha ki konum topladığım sistemle ilgili güncel bir makale olacak şu an 3 kart arasında kaldım.
ASUS STRIX GTX 960 4 GB — 1700TL.
MSI Gaming X GTX 960 2 GB — 1450TL.
MSI Gaming X 1050 Ti 4 GB — 1850TL.
Not: 2 tane 960 modelini elden alabilirim.
1050 Ti ise şehir dışından ayrıca 1050 Ti kutulu faturalı 7 ay garantili.
SEMIKAANCAKIR
Kilopat
-
-
#2
antalyalii dedi:
Arkadaşlar iyi Sosyaller son defa ekran kartı önerisi için konu açıyorum bir daha ki konum topladığım sistemle ilgili güncel bir makale olacak şu an 3 kart arasında kaldım.
ASUS STRIX GTX 960 4 GB — 1700TL.
MSI Gaming X GTX 960 2 GB — 1450TL.
MSI Gaming X 1050 Ti 4 GB — 1850TL.Not: 2 tane 960 modelini elden alabilirim.
1050 Ti ise şehir dışından ayrıca 1050 Ti kutulu faturalı 7 ay garantili.Genişletmek için tıkla…
Param Güvende ile 1050 Ti.
Emrullah AKTAŞ
Hectopat
-
-
#3
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Gaming
Karşılaştırma: Asus Strix GeForce GTX 960 DirectCU II 4GB vs MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Gaming vs MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming 2GB | Ekran kartı Karşılaştırma
BerkayZ87
Yottapat!
-
-
#4
1050 Ti 4 GB daha iyi.
anonyuser
Hectopat
-
-
#5
antalyalii dedi:
Arkadaşlar iyi sosyaller son defa ekran kartı önerisi için konu açıyorum bir daha ki konum topladığım sistemle ilgili güncel bir makale olacak şu an 3 kart arasında kaldım.
ASUS STRIX GTX 960 4 GB — 1700TL.
MSI Gaming X GTX 960 2 GB — 1450TL.
MSI Gaming X 1050 Ti 4 GB — 1850TL.Not: 2 tane 960 modelini elden alabilirim.
1050 Ti ise şehir dışından ayrıca 1050 Ti kutulu faturalı 7 ay garantili.Genişletmek için tıkla…
MSI Gaming X 1050 Ti 4 GB.
SCN
Kilopat
-
-
#6
En az gtx 1650 almaya çalışın. https://www.sahibinden.com/ilan/iki…tu-msi-gtx-1650-4gb-aero-itx-1045057480/detay
Rustin Cohle
Megapat
-
-
#7
https://www.sahibinden.com/ilan/iki…asaustu-msi-gtx-970-gaming-x-1045546246/detay
Pazarlık ile GTX 970.
antalyalii
Picopat
-
-
#8
Emrullah AKTAŞ dedi:
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Gaming
Karşılaştırma: Asus Strix GeForce GTX 960 DirectCU II 4GB vs MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Gaming vs MSI GeForce GTX 960 Gaming 2GB | Ekran kartı Karşılaştırma
Genişletmek için tıkla…
Hocam 2gb lık model niye 1 puan fazla almış anlam veremedim forza 5 de vram uyarısı veriyor 2gb lık olan model
DiablouSCN dedi:
En az GTX 1650 almaya çalışın.
https://www.sahibinden.com/ilan/iki…tu-msi-gtx-1650-4gb-aero-itx-1045057480/detay
Genişletmek için tıkla…
Rustin Cohle dedi:
https://www.sahibinden.com/ilan/iki…asaustu-msi-gtx-970-gaming-x-1045546246/detay
Pazarlık ile GTX 970.Genişletmek için tıkla…
Hocam 960 2 GB bile yetiyor bana en fazla RDR2 ve Forza 5 oynarım insanlar 100TL pazarlığa bile reddediyor.
Rustin Cohle
Megapat
-
-
#9
antalyalii dedi:
Hocam 2 GB’lık model niye 1 puan fazla almış anlam veremedim Forza 5 de VRAM uyarısı veriyor 2 GB’lık olan model.
Hocam 960 2 GB bile yetiyor bana en fazla RDR2 ve Forza 5 oynarım insanlar 100TL pazarlığa bile reddediyor.
Genişletmek için tıkla…
RDR2 ve Forza 5 için 960 2 GB tam yeterli gelmez kaç sefer kart alıyorsun zaten. Bir kere al güçlü bir kart al.
viczafervic
Centipat
-
-
#10
RX 6400.
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Zotac GeForce GTX 960 AMP!: Comparison
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Zotac GeForce GTX 960 AMP!
VS
WINNER
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Rating: 19 points
Zotac GeForce GTX 960 AMP!
Rating: 18 points
Performance
Memory
General information
Functions
Benchmark tests
Top specifications and features
- Passmark score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU benchmark score
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU benchmark score
Passmark score
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: 6201
Zotac GeForce GTX 960 AMP!: 5914
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: 6680
Zotac GeForce GTX 960 AMP!: 6565
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: 7335
Zotac GeForce GTX 960 AMP!: 7758
3DMark Ice Storm GPU score
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: 345818
Zotac GeForce GTX 960 AMP!: 304643
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU benchmark score of
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: 49920
Zotac GeForce GTX 960 AMP!: 48920
Description
The Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti graphics card is based on the Pascal architecture.
Zotac GeForce GTX 960 AMP! on the Maxwell architecture. The first has 3300 million transistors. The second is 2940 million. The Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has a transistor size of 14 nm, versus 28.
The base clock frequency of the first video card is 1290 MHz versus 1266 MHz for the second.
Go to memory. Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 4 GB. On Zotac GeForce GTX 960 AMP! 4 GB installed. The bandwidth of the first video card is 112.1 Gb / s versus 112.2 Gb / s of the second.
FLOPS for the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 1.92. Zotac GeForce GTX 960 AMP! 2.57.
Moves to benchmark tests. In the Passmark benchmark, the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scored 6201 points. But the second card is 5914 points. In 3DMark, the first model scored 7335 points. The second 7758 points.
For interfaces. The first video card is connected using PCIe 3.0 x16. The second is PCIe 3.0 x16. The video card Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — Directx version — 12. OpenGL version — 4.
5. The video card Zotac GeForce GTX 960 AMP! — Directx version is 12. OpenGL version is 4.5.
Why is Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti better than Zotac GeForce GTX 960 AMP!
- Passmark score 6201 vs 5914 5% higher
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score 6680 vs 6565 , up 2%
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU score 345818 vs 304643 , up 14%
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU score 49920 vs 48920 , 2% up
- GPU base clock 1290 MHz vs 1266 MHz, 2% higher
Comparison of Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Zotac GeForce GTX 960 AMP!
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
1290MHz
max 2459
Average: 1124.9 MHz
1266MHz
max 2459
Average: 1124.9 MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
1752MHz
max 16000
Average: 1468 MHz
1753MHz
max 16000
Average: 1468 MHz
FLOPS
The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
1.92TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 53 TFLOPS
2.57TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 53 TFLOPS
RAM
4 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
4 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
Turbo GPU
If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can go to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
1392MHz
max 2903
Average: 1514 MHz
1329MHz
max 2903
Average: 1514 MHz
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all
61.9 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
81 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
Architecture name
Pascal
Maxwell
GPU name
GP107
GM206
Shared memory 90 003
N/A
N/A
Memory bandwidth
This is the rate at which the device saves or reads information.
112.1GB/s
max 2656
Average: 257.8 GB/s
112.2GB/s
max 2656
Average: 257.8 GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all
7008MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
7012MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
RAM
4 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
4 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates for improved overall performance
Show all
5
Mean: 4.9
5
Mean: 4.9
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle.
This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all
128bit
max 8192
Average: 283.9bit
128bit
max 8192
Average: 283.9bit
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
75W
Average value: 160 W
120W
Average value: 160 W
Process
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
14 nm
Average: 34.7 nm
28 nm
Average: 34.7 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
3300 million
max 80000
Average: 7150 million
2940 million
max 80000
Average: 7150 million
PCIe version
Considerable speed is provided for an expansion card used to connect a computer to peripherals.
The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all
3
Average: 3
3
Average: 3
Width
172mm
max 421.7
Average: 192.1mm
208mm
max 421.7
Average: 192.1mm
Height
113mm
max 619
Average: 89.6mm
111.2mm
max 619
Average: 89.6mm
DirectX
Used in demanding games, providing enhanced graphics
12
max 12.2
Mean: 11.4
12
max 12.2
Mean: 11.4
OpenCL version
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
1.2
max 4.6
Average: 2.2
1.2
max 4.
6
Average: 2.2
opengl version
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.5
max 4.6
Average: 4.2
4.5
max 4.6
Average: 4.2
Shader model version
6.4
max 6.7
Average: 5.9
6.4
max 6.7
Average: 5.9
Vulkan Version
1.2
1.1
CUDA Version
Yes
90 013 Yes
HDMI output
HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini-HDMI ports. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Full text
Yes
Yes
HDMI version
The latest version provides a wide signal transmission channel due to the increased number of audio channels, frames per second, etc.
Show all
2
max 2.
1
Mean: 1.9
max 2.1
Mean: 1.9
DisplayPort
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort
1
Average: 2.2
3
Average: 2.2
DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI
1
Mean: 1.4
1
Mean: 1.4
Number of HDMI connectors
The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
Show all
1
Average: 1.1
Average: 1.1
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
HDMI
Yes
9000 9 Yes
Passmark score
6201
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
5914
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score
49920
max 1
3
The second video card in Passmark scored 5914 points. 
Zotac GeForce GTX 960 AMP! equipped with No HDMI outputs. 
4x faster texturing speed: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s 
7 times greater: 301.168 vs 30.966 | Release date | 25 October 2016 vs 30 August 2016 |
| Core frequency | 1392 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Boost core clock | 1392 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Texturing speed | 66. 82 GTexel/s vs 27.6 GTexel/s |
| Number of shaders | 768 vs 24 |
| Floating point performance | 2.138 gflops vs 441.6 gflops |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 6298 vs 1118 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 651 vs 270 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 18921 vs 4647 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 vs 27.945 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 vs 312.246 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
5.071 vs 1.793 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 vs 20.158 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 vs 30.966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 1945 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 2338 vs 388 |
Reasons to choose Intel HD Graphics 630
- 5 times less power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 16 times more maximum memory size(s): 64 GB vs 4 GB
9099 4
0 — T-Rex (Frames) Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|||||
| Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score |
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 6298 | 1118 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 651 | 270 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 18921 | 4647 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
75.758 | 27.945 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 312.246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 1.793 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 20.158 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 30.966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 1859 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
3687 | 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 1945 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3344 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 2338 | 388 |
Feature comparison
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | Intel HD Graphics 630 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9. 5 |
| Codename | GP107 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Production date | October 25, 2016 | 30 August 2016 |
| Price at first issue date | $139 | |
| Place in the ranking | 438 | 1195 |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 46.07 | |
| Boost core clock | 1392 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Core frequency | 1392MHz | 350 MHz |
| Number of CUDA conveyors | 768 | |
| Floating point performance | 2. 138 gflops |
441.6 gflops |
| Process | 14nm | 14nm |
| Maximum temperature | 97 °C | |
| Number of shaders | 768 | 24 |
| Texturing speed | 66.82 GTexel/s | 27.6 GTexel/s |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Number of transistors | 3,300 million | 189 million |
| Video connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.
|