Redshift Benchmark Results (Updated) — CG Director
Redshift Benchmark results are not easy to find, that is why I compiled a list for everyone to take a look at. I myself use Redshift for Rendering Projects on a daily basis and recently purchased a new Render node with lots of GPUs.
When you build a new PC or Render node for Rendering, there is no way around digging deep into benchmarks.
Cinebench Scores are great for comparing CPU Rendering performance, but if you use Redshift heavily, these benchmark results will be invaluable:
Note that there are new Redshift versions coming out every couple of weeks, which might perform better or worse than the scores you can find in the following lists.
Unless there are major feature updates, the relative performance between GPUs should stay roughly the same, though.
Redshift 3.5.15 Benchmark Results [RTX ON, Nvidia GPUs]
Please note, for Price / Value calculation we are using MSRP. Given the current market situation, many GPUs might not be available at MSRP.
GPU(s) | VRAM | Time (Minutes) | Price | Perf / $ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1x GTX 1080 Ti | 11 | 08.56 | 300 | |
1x RTX 3060 | 12 | 05.38 | 350 | |
1x RTX 2060 SUPER | 8 | 06.31 | 350 | |
1x RTX 4060 Ti | 8 | 03.30 | 399 | |
1x RTX 2070 | 8 | 06.28 | 400 | |
1x RTX 3060 Ti | 8 | 04.26 | 450 | |
1x RTX 2070 SUPER | 8 | 06.12 | 450 | |
1x RTX 3070 | 10 | 03.57 | 500 | |
1x RTX 4070 | 12 | 02.23 | 599 | |
1x RTX 3070 Ti | 8 | 03.27 | 599 | |
1x RTX 2080 | 8 | 06.01 | 600 | |
1x RTX 2080 SUPER | 8 | 05.47 | 650 | |
1x RTX 4070 Ti | 12 | 02. 08 | 799 | |
1x RTX 3080 | 10 | 03.07 | 850 | |
2x RTX 2070 SUPER | 8 | 03.03 | 900 | |
1x RTX A4000 | 16 | 04.40 | 1000 | |
1x RTX 4080 | 16 | 01.47 | 1199 | |
1x RTX 3080 Ti | 12 | 02.44 | 1199 | |
2x RTX 2080 | 8 | 03.10 | 1200 | |
1x RTX 2080 Ti | 11 | 04.27 | 1200 | |
2x RTX 2080 SUPER | 8 | 02.58 | 1300 | |
1x RTX 3090 | 24 | 02.42 | 1499 | |
1x RTX 4090 | 24 | 01.16 | 1599 | |
4x RTX 2070 | 8 | 01.56 | 1600 | |
4x RTX 2070 SUPER | 8 | 01.42 | 1800 | |
1x RTX 3090 Ti | 24 | 02.36 | 1999 | |
1x RTX A5000 | 24 | 03. 06 | 2300 | |
4x RTX 2080 | 8 | 01.36 | 2400 | |
2x RTX 2080 Ti | 11 | 02.18 | 2400 | |
4x RTX 2080 SUPER | 8 | 01.32 | 2600 | |
1x RTX Titan | 24 | 04.16 | 2700 | |
2x RTX 3090 | 24 | 01.15 | 3000 | |
2x RTX 4090 | 24 | 00.47 | 3198 | |
4x RTX 2080 Ti | 11 | 01.07 | 4800 | |
1x RTX A6000 | 48 | 02.42 | 4800 | |
4x RTX 3090 | 24 | 00.45 | 6000 | |
6x RTX 3090 | 24 | 00.31 | 9000 | |
8x RTX 2080 Ti | 11 | 00.49 | 9600 | |
1x RTX 6000 Ada | 48 | 01.28 | 10000 | |
7x RTX 4090 | 24 | 00.18 | 11193 | |
8x A100 | 40 | 00. 36 | 88000 | |
GPU(s) | VRAM | Time (Minutes) | Price | Perf / $ |
Redshift 3.0.45 Metal Benchmark Results [AMD GPUs, MAC/Apple Silicon]
We are keeping these results separate from the Nvidia / CUDA Results for now, as Redshift Metal isn’t as mature as Redshift CUDA yet, and the benchmark runs were done on eGPUs and/or beta macOS versions. Take these scores with a grain of salt. They’ll stabilize and improve over time.
Do note that value is more difficult to calculate, as many of these GPUs are either a mobile GPU, built into an eGPU, or integrated into a CPU as an iGPU. We are using the cost of the entire system (the cheapest we can find with that particular GPU) here to calculate price / value.
Please note, for Price / Value calculation we are using MSRP. Given the current market situation, many GPUs might not be available at MSRP.
GPU(s) | VRAM | Time (Minutes) | Price | Perf / $ |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | 16 | 12. 01 | 499 | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | 16 | 06.13 | 649 | |
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | 16 | 05.26 | 999 | |
Apple M1 (Mac Mini) | 10 | 38.25 | 1000 | |
Apple M1 | 5 | 37.21 | 1000 | |
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | 4 | 25.29 | 1000 | |
Apple M1 Max (32 Core GPU) | 32 (unified) | 10.34 | 3300 | |
Apple M1 Ultra (48 Core GPU) | 64 (unified) | 08.30 | 4000 | |
Apple M1 Ultra (64 Core GPU) | 128 (unified) | 06.12 | 5600 | |
2x AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | 32 | 03.58 | 11199 | |
4x AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | 32/64 | 02.21 | 16799 | |
GPU(s) | VRAM | Time (Minutes) | Price | Perf / $ |
Redshift 2.
6.53 Benchmark Results
GPU(s) | OS | CPU Threads | CPU GHz | Time (Minutes) |
---|---|---|---|---|
8x RTX 2080Ti 11GB | Windows | 32 | 2.1 | 01.29 |
8x GTX 1080Ti 11GB | Windows | 32 | 2.1 | 01.57 |
4x GTX 1080Ti 11GB | Windows | 32 | 2.1 | 03.25 |
8x RTX 2070 8GB | Windows | 32 | 2.1 | 01.56 |
RTX 2070 8GB | Windows | 32 | 2.1 | 12.50 |
8x GTX 1080 8GB | Windows | 40 | 2.2 | 02.26 |
4x GTX 980 Ti 6GB | Windows | 56 | 2.3 | 04.48 |
RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | Windows | 36 | 2.6 | 08.38 |
RTX 2080 8GB | Windows | 36 | 2.6 | 10.59 |
2x GTX 1060 6GB | Windows | 32 | 2.6 | 11. 07 |
Quadro K5200 8GB | Windows | 24 | 2.6 | 38.50 |
GTX 1080 8GB | MacOS | 8 | 2.9 | 16.00 |
4x GTX 1080Ti 11GB | Windows | 36 | 2.35 | 03.21 |
GTX 960 2GB | Windows | 4 | 2.68 | 44.56 |
8x Tesla V100-SXM2 16GB | Linux | 64 | 2.74 | 01.03 |
GTX 780 3GB | Windows | 8 | 2.81 | 31.05 |
Titan V 12GB | Linux | 12 | 2.90 | 07.06 |
2x GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | Windows | 16 | 2.99 | 06.15 |
2x RTX 2070 8GB | Windows | 16 | 3.0 | 06.29 |
Quadro RTX 6000 | Windows | 20 | 3.1 | 08.47 |
2x TITAN Xp 12GB | Linux | 16 | 3.2 | 06.16 |
2x GTX 1080 8GB | Windows | 12 | 3. 2 | 07.26 |
2x GTX 1070 Ti + 1x GTX 1070 | Windows | 12 | 3.2 | 06.12 |
1x GTX 1070 + 1x GTX 1070 Ti | MacOS | 12 | 3.3 | 08.17 |
GTX TITANX 12GB | Windows | 32 | 3.3 | 17.33 |
GTX 1080 Ti 11 GB | Windows | 12 | 3.4 | 11.44 |
GTX 780Ti 3GB | Windows | 12 | 3.4 | 25.58 |
4x GTX 1070 8GB | Windows | 12 | 3.5 | 04.15 |
2x Quadro GP100 16GB TCC | Windows | 12 | 3.5 | 04.25 |
2x Quadro GP100 16GB | Windows | 12 | 3.5 | 05.04 |
2x Quadro P6000 24GB TCC | Windows | 12 | 3.5 | 05.55 |
2x Quadro P6000 24GB | Windows | 12 | 3.5 | 06.28 |
Quadro GP100 16GB TCC | Windows | 12 | 3. 5 | 08.43 |
Quadro GP100 16GB | Windows | 12 | 3.5 | 09.57 |
GTX TITANX Pascal 12GB TCC | Windows | 12 | 3.5 | 10.54 |
Quadro P6000 24GB TCC | Windows | 12 | 3.5 | 11.31 |
GTX TITANX Pascal 12GB | Windows | 12 | 3.5 | 11.59 |
Quadro P6000 24GB | Windows | 12 | 3.5 | 12.30 |
Quadro M6000 12GB | Linux | 12 | 3.5 | 14.23 |
GTX TITANX 12GB | MacOS | 12 | 3.5 | 14.25 |
Quadro M6000 24GB TCC | Windows | 12 | 3.5 | 14.33 |
GTX TITANX 12GB | Windows | 12 | 3.5 | 15.40 |
Quadro M6000 24GB | Windows | 12 | 3.5 | 15.42 |
GTX 1070 8GB | Windows | 12 | 3.5 | 17.11 |
GTX 980 4GB | Windows | 12 | 3. 5 | 23.21 |
GTX 970 4GB | MacOS | 12 | 3.5 | 27.22 |
4x GTX 1080Ti 11GB | Windows | 12 | 3.6 | 03.07 |
RTX 2070 8GB | Windows | 6 | 3.6 | 11.35 |
RTX 2060 6GB | Windows | 8 | 3.6 | 15.04 |
GTX 1060 6GB | Windows | 8 | 3.6 | 23.11 |
GTX 1660Ti 6GB | Windows | 8 | 3.6 | 24.53 |
RTX 2060 Super 8GB | Windows | 16 | 3.6 | 12.17 |
RTX 2070 Super 8GB | Windows | 16 | 3.6 | 11.17 |
RTX 2080 Super 8GB | Windows | 16 | 3.6 | 10.15 |
4x RTX 2080Ti 11GB | Windows | 16 | 3.8 | 02.28 |
2x RTX 2080Ti 11GB | Windows | 16 | 3.8 | 04.28 |
GTX 1070 8GB | Linux | 12 | 3. 8 | 15.05 |
GTX TITAN X 12 GB | Linux | 12 | 3.78 | 14.07 |
2x GTX 1070 8GB | Linux | 12 | 3.79 | 07.39 |
2x GTX 1070 8GB | Windows | 8 | 4.0 | 08.06 |
2x GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | MacOS | 8 | 4.00 | 06.30 |
4x GTX TITANX 12GB | Linux | 12 | 4.1 | 03.36 |
4x GTX TITAN X 12 GB | Windows | 16 | 4.3 | 04.28 |
2x GTX 980Ti 6GB | Windows | 20 | 4.3 | 07.35 |
GPU | OS | CPU Threads | CPU GHz | Time |
Some interesting findings are, that Different OS’s have an impact on rendering performance.
Linux, for example, seems to be doing somewhat better than Windows. These benchmarks are also great in analyzing what CPU is best for GPU Rendering in Redshift and how low the Clock Speed can go before major performance impact is inevitable.
Multi-GPU Scaling works quite well in Redshift, though with those 1-2 minute Results the benchmark probably is just too short to make good use of all that power.
You might find Benchmarking scores run on more recent Redshift Versions on the Redshift Forums, so head on over if you have an account and talk with all of the great Users.
If you are thinking about getting a new GPU Rendering Computer altogether, be sure to check out this article on what hardware to get for the best GPU Rendering Workstation.
I’ve also written an in-depth article on building your own Renderfarm, which might very well be something you should be doing for faster Redshift Rendering.
If new hardware is not in your budget right now, check out our Guide on how to Render Faster, which could cut your rendertimes in half with just some minor time investment on your end.
Missing any GPU Benchmark Results or having trouble with one of your builds? Let me know in the comments.
CGDirector is Reader-supported. When you buy through our links, we may earn an affiliate commission.
rtx 3050 ti vs rtx 1660 ti
AlleShoppingVideosBilderMapsNewsBücher
Suchoptionen
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop
versus.com › Home › Grafikkarte Vergleich
Warum ist Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop besser als Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti? · 40W niedrigere TDP (Thermal Design Power) · 2100million mehr Transistoren.
RTX 3050 Ti vs GTX 1660 Ti Benchmarks für … — GPUCheck
www.gpucheck.com › intel-core-i9-10900k-vs-intel-core-i7-8700k-3-70ghz
Unser Urteil: Ein Upgrade von GTX 1660 Ti auf RTX 3050 Ti ist nicht zu empfehlen, da es weniger als 30% der Leistungsverbesserung ist.
Ähnliche Fragen
Was ist besser GTX 1660 oder RTX 3050?
Ist eine RTX 3050 TI gut?
Was ist besser 1660 Super oder 3060 TI?
Ist eine 1660 TI gut?
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) vs RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
gpu. userbenchmark.com › Compare › Nvidia-RTX-…
Based on 103703 user benchmarks for the Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) and the RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money …
1650-Ti · Compare · 3060
GTX 1660 Ti (mobil) vs RTX 3050 Ti Mobile [in 5 Benchmarks]
technical.city › video › GeForce-GTX-1660-Ti-mobile-vs-GeForce-RTX-3…
Wir vergleichen im Detail GTX 1660 Ti (mobil) mit RTX 3050 Ti Mobile: Spezifikationen, Computerspiele, Benchmarks.
Speicher · Benchmarks · Spiele · Stimmen Sie ab
RTX 3050 Ti vs GTX 1660 Ti — MUST See Before Buying … — YouTube
www.youtube.com › watch
02.08.2021 · Find the best gaming laptop deals at my site https://gaminglaptop.dealsThis comparison is a …
Dauer: 10:23
Gepostet: 02.08.2021
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU — NotebookCheck
www.notebookcheck.net › GeForce-GTX-1660-Ti-Mobile-vs-GeForce-RT…
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU — Benchmarks, Tests and Comparisons.
Notebook Size: medium sized
Power Consumption: 80 Watt
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU — Notebookcheck.com
www.notebookcheck.com › GeForce-GTX-1660-Ti-Mobile-vs-GeForce-R…
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) — Benchmarks, Tests and Comparisons.
[Vergleich] NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti (75W) vs … — LaptopMedia
laptopmedia.com › comparisons › comparison-nvidia-geforce-rtx-3050-ti-…
20.09.2021 · [Vergleich] NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti (75W) vs. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti – Die GTX 1660 Ti ist ein starker Gegner · Specs-Tabelle · GPU-Benchmarks.
Nvidia RTX 3050 vs Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti: How do they compare?
www.trustedreviews.com › Versus
26.01.2022 · When it comes down to it, the new Nvidia RTX 3050 offers comparable 1080p performance to the Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti at a similarly tempting price.
GTX 1660 Ti (6gb) vs RTX 3050 Ti (4gb). I’m confused … — Reddit
www.reddit.com › GamingLaptops › comments › gt…
The 3050ti is slightly faster than the 1660ti but the advantage of the 1660ti is that it has more vram. This means it’ll do better with higher …
Ähnliche Suchanfragen
GTX 1660 Ti vs RTX 3050 Laptop
RTX 3050 Ti vs GTX 1660 Ti
RTX 3050 Ti vs GTX 1660 Super
RTX 3050 Ti vs RTX 2060 Laptop
GTX 1650 Ti vs RTX 3050 Ti
RTX 3050 Ti vs RTX 3060
GTX 1660 Ti vs RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs GTX 1660
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super: What is the difference?
smartphonesvideo cardswireless headphonesprocessors
50 points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
60 points
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
€ 899
€ 390
€ 899
Comparison winner
€ 390
vs
54 facts in comparison
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super?
- 128bit wider memory bus?
384bit vs 256bit - 256 more stream processors?
2816 vs 2560 - 16 more texture units (TMUs)?
176 vs 160 - 32 more ROPs?
96 vs 64 - 1 more DisplayPort outputs?
3 vs 2 - 3. 2dB lower idle noise?
37.8dB vs 41dB
- GPU frequency 605MHz higher?
1605MHz vs 1000MHz - 3.43 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
9.06 TFLOPS vs 5.63 TFLOPS - 17.3 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
113.3 GPixel/s vs 96 GPixel/s - 35W below TDP?
215W vs 250W - 2GB more VRAM?
8GB vs 6GB - 6988MHz higher effective clock speed?
14000MHz vs 7012MHz - 107.2 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
9more memory bandwidth?
448GB/s vs 336.5GB/s
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
vs
02 Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
XFX Speedster MERC 308 Radeon RX 6650 XT Black
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
9 0002 Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming OC
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 6650XT Ultra
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Price Match
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Buy Used:
€9. 99
Product | Store | Price | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EVGA GeForce GTX 980 TI ACX 2.0 + Grafik…EVGA GeForce GTX 980 TI ACX 2.0 + Grafikkarte | €899 902 28 | |||
€876 | ||||
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 24GB OC…ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 24GB OC Edition Gaming Grafikkarte (DLSS 3, PCIe 4.0, 24GB GDDR6X, HDMI 2.1a, DisplayPort 1.4a, TUF-RTX4090-O24G-GAMING) | €936 |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Buy used:
€220
Product | Shop | Price | |
---|---|---|---|
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12GB. ..Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12GB V2 LHR 227 ASUS Dual Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 12GB E…ASUS Dual Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 12GB EVO OC Edition Gaming Grafikkarte (GDDR6 Speicher, PCIe 3.0, 2X HDMI 2.0b, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a, DUAL-RTX2060-O12G-EVO) | €335 | ||
VGA Zotac NVIDIA GeForce RTX3060 Twin Ed…VGA Zotac NVIDIA GeForce RTX3060 Twin Edge OC 12GB (GDDR6,HDMI 2.1,3xDP 1.4a, ) | €318 | ||
MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X TRIO…MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X TRIO 8GB | €280 | ||
902 28 | MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X TRIO…MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X TRIO 9ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2070 Super AMP …ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2070 Super AMP | €210 | |
MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X TRIO. ..MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X TRIO | €235 |
User Reviews
Overall Rating
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti 90 003
0 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
0. 0 /10
0 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
3 User reviews
N vidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
9.0 /10
3 User Reviews Games
No reviews yet 9
Performance
No reviews yet
9036 9 9.0 /10
3 votes
Quiet operation
No reviews yet
9.7 /10
3 votes
Reliability
No reviews yet
9.3 /10
3 votes
900 46 Performance
GPU clock speed
1000MHz
1605MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
turbo GPU
1076MHz
1770MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
pixel rate
96 GPixel/s
113.3 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
FLOPS
5.63 TFLOPS
9. 06 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.
texture size
176 GTexels/s
283.2 GTexels/s
Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
GPU memory speed
1753MHz
1750MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
Shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
texture units (TMUs)
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
ROPs
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
effective memory speed
7012MHz
14000MHz
The effective memory clock is calculated from the size and data transfer rate of the memory. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
maximum memory bandwidth
336.5GB/s
448GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
versions of GDDR memory
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.
memory bus width
384bit
256bit
A wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Memory troubleshooting code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Features
DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti)
Some applications use OpenCL to use the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphics computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
Supports multi-monitor technology
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
GPU boot temperature
Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
supports ray tracing
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
Supports 3D
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
supports DLSS
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.
AMD SAM / Intel Resizable BAR
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super)
AMD Smart Access Memory (SAM) and Intel Resizable BAR are two technologies that allow the CPU to have faster access to the graphics card, which can improve performance. This requires a compatible motherboard, graphics card, and processor.
Ports
has HDMI output
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.
HDMI connectors
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti)
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices such as game consoles and TVs at the same time.
HDMI version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti)
HDMI 2.0
New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.
DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
USB-C ports
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super)
With more USB-C ports, you can connect more devices/peripherals.
DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using mini DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Buy used:
€9.99
Product | Shop | Price | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVGA GeForce GTX 980 TI ACX 2. 0 + Grafik…EVGA GeForce GTX 980 TI ACX 2.0 + Grafikkarte | € Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC (…Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC (12GB GDDR6X/PCI Express 4.0/2640MHz/21000MHz), Schwarz | 902 28 | €876 | ||
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 24GB OC…ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 24GB OC Edition Gaming Grafikkarte (DLSS 3, PCIe 4.0, 24GB GDDR6X, HDMI 2.1a, DisplayPort 1.4a, TUF-RTX4090-O24 G- MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming X Trio 12…MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Gaming X Trio 12G Grafikkarte — NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti, 12 GB GDDR6X Speicher | €936 |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Buy used:
€220
Product | Shop | Price | |
---|---|---|---|
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12GB…Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12GB V2 LHR Grafikkarte, ASUS Dual Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 12GB E. ..ASUS Dual Nvidia GeForce RTX 206 0 12GB EVO OC Edition Gaming Grafikkarte (GDDR6 Speicher, PCIe 3.0 , 2X HDMI 2.0b, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a, DUAL-RTX2060-O12G-EVO) | €335 | ||
VGA Zotac NVIDIA GeForce RTX3060 Twin Ed…VGA Zotac NVIDIA GeForce RTX3060 Twin Edge OC 12GB (GDDR6,HDMI 2.1,3xDP 1.4a, ) | €318 | ||
MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X TRIO…MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X TRIO 8GB | €280 | ||
902 28 | MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X TRIO…MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X TRIO 9ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2070 Super AMP …ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2070 Super AMP | €210 | |
MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X TRIO. ..MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X TRIO | €235 |
Comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Video card performance analysis by benchmarks: 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, PassMark — G2D Mark, PassMark — G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) , GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
versus
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Benefits
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Newer graphics card, release date difference 3 year(s) 7 month(s) 9 0055
- Core frequency about 22% more: 1215 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Boost core clock 34% more: 1440 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process for the video card allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2. 2 times less power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2000 times more memory frequency: 14000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- About 31% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score benchmark: 754 3 vs 5780
- GFXBench 4.0 performance — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) about 78% more: 18604 vs 10471
- GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) about 78% more: 18604 vs 10 471
- 2.4 times greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark: 8898 vs 3695
- 2.4 times greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 8898 vs 3695 900 55
- Capacity in 2.4 times greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 8029 vs 3338
- 2.4 times greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) benchmark: 8029 vs 3338
Issue date | 29 January 2019 vs 2 June 2015 |
Core frequency | 1215 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost core clock | 1440 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
Process | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory frequency | 14000 MHz vs 7. 0 GB/s |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 7543 vs 5780 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 vs 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 vs 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 vs 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 vs 3338 |
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- 22% more shader processors: 2816 vs 2304
- Approximately 43% improvement in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 859 vs 601
- Approx. shader processors
2816 vs 2304 PassMark — G2D Mark 859 vs 601 PassMark — G3D Mark 13865 vs 12354 Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score GPU 1 GPU 2 PassMark — G2D Mark GPU 1 GPU 2 PassMark — G3D Mark GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) GPU 1 GPU 2 Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 7543 5780 PassMark — G2D Mark 601 859 PassMark — G3D Mark 12354 13865 GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 18604 10471 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 18604 10471 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 8898 3695 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 8898 3695 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 8029 3338 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 8029 3338 Geekbench — OpenCL 32511 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 145.843 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1722.98 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 11.661 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 37.16 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 787.997 Performance comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti Architecture Turing Maxwell 2. 0 Codename TU106 GM200 Issue date 29 January 2019 June 2, 2015 Place in the ranking 110 266 Price now $489.99 $679.99 Type Laptop Desktop Price/performance ratio (0-100) 49.06 23.43 Price at first issue date $649 Boost core clock 1440 MHz 1075MHz Core frequency 1215MHz 1000 MHz Process 12nm 28nm Number of shaders 2304 2816 Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 250 Watt Number of transistors 10,800 million 8,000 million Number of CUDA conveyors 2816 Floating point performance 6. 060 gflops Texturing speed 176 billion / sec Video connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 Audio input for HDMI Internal G-SYNC support HDCP Maximum resolution VGA 2048×1536 Multi-monitor support Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Tire PCI Express 3.0 Height 4.376″ (11.1 cm) Length 10.5″ (26.7cm) Recommended power supply 600 Watt SLI support 4x Additional power connectors 6-pin + 8-pin DirectX 12.0 12.