Gtx 980 vs gtx 1050 ti: Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti vs 980

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 980 Graphics cards Comparison

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 980 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today’s games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards’ performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don’t overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1050 Ti will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 980 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Check Price

GeForce GTX 980

Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	GeForce GTX 980
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	165 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3. 0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pins
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Recommended system power (PSU)		500 Watt
	Check Price	Check Price

• GeForce GTX 980 has 120% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
• Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 980 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
• Both cards are used in Desktops.
• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is build with Pascal architecture, and GeForce GTX 980 — with Maxwell.
• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 980 — by 28 nm process technology.
• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 135 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 980.
• Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 7001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 980.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p	35−40	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	35−40
QHD / 1440p	16−18	30−35
4K / 2160p	10−11	18−20
low / 720p	60−65	80−85
medium / 1080p	40−45	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
high / 1080p	55−60	85−90
ultra / 1080p	45−50	75−80
QHD / 1440p	35−40	60−65
4K / 2160p	18−20	30−35
low / 720p	100−110	140−150
medium / 1080p	60−65	95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Battlefield 5 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 980.
low / 768p	250−260	250−260
medium / 768p	220−230	230−240
ultra / 1080p	180−190	−
QHD / 1440p	110−120	150−160
4K / 2160p	70−75	100−110
high / 768p	210−220	220−230
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
medium / 1080p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
high / 1080p	45−50	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	65−70
QHD / 1440p	27−30	45−50
4K / 2160p	14−16	24−27
low / 720p	80−85	100−110
medium / 1080p	45−50	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Far Cry 5 is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
high / 1080p	60−65	100−110
ultra / 1080p	45−50	80−85
QHD / 1440p	27−30	50−55
4K / 2160p	27−30	21−24
low / 720p	180−190	230−240
medium / 1080p	110−120	150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Fortnite is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
high / 1080p	60−65	95−100
ultra / 1080p	45−50	75−80
QHD / 1440p	30−35	55−60
4K / 2160p	24−27	35−40
low / 720p	100−110	140−150
medium / 1080p	65−70	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Forza Horizon 4 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
low / 768p	140−150	160−170
medium / 768p	120−130	150−160
high / 1080p	70−75	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	55−60
QHD / 1440p	21−24	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
high / 1080p	24−27	40−45
ultra / 1080p	20−22	35−40
QHD / 1440p	16−18	27−30
4K / 2160p	8−9	16−18
low / 720p	65−70	100−110
medium / 1080p	30−35	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
low / 768p	130−140	120−130
medium / 1080p	120−130	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 980.
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	14−16	65−70
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	100−110	130−140
medium / 1080p	18−20	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
high / 1080p	24−27	40−45
ultra / 1080p	16−18	27−30
QHD / 1440p	10−11	21−24
4K / 2160p	7−8	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	100−110
medium / 1080p	35−40	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
low / 768p	130−140	210−220
medium / 768p	85−90	140−150
high / 1080p	45−50	80−85
ultra / 1080p	24−27	45−50
4K / 2160p	16−18	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
low / 768p	90−95	140−150
medium / 768p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	50−55	70−75
high / 768p	60−65	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 980 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	GeForce GTX 980
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Code name	N17P-G1	GM204
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	25 October 2016	19 September 2014
Pipelines	768	2048
Core clock speed	1291 MHz
Boost Clock	1392 MHz	1216 MHz
Transistor count	3,300 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	66. 82	144 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	2,138 gflops	4,981 gflops
Length	145 mm	10.5″ (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	224 GB/s
Shared memory	—	—
G-SYNC support	+	+
VR Ready	+
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1. 2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	+	+
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)	0.3 kh/s	0.54 kh/s
CUDA cores	768	2048
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376″ (11.1 cm)
SLI options		+
Multi monitor support		4 displays
HDMI		+
HDCP		+
Maximum VGA resolution		2048×1536
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	326 Mh/s	579 Mh/s
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		+
H. 264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder		+
Optimus		+
Decred / DCR (Decred)	1.01 Gh/s	1.74 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	12.62 Mh/s	20.28 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)	156.48 Sol/s	312.12 Sol/s
GameStream		+
GeForce ShadowPlay		+
GPU Boost		2.0
GameWorks		+
BatteryBoost		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Similar compares

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro T1000
• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
• GeForce GTX 980 vs Quadro T1000
• GeForce GTX 980 vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
• GeForce GTX 980 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
• GeForce GTX 980 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti: What is the difference?

44points

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

61points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Comparison winner

vs

54 facts in comparison

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Why is MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti?

• 290MHz faster GPU clock speed?
  1290MHzvs1000MHz
• 175W lower TDP?
  75Wvs250W
• 316MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
  1392MHzvs1076MHz
• 14nm smaller semiconductor size?
  14nmvs28nm
• 90mm narrower?
  177mmvs267mm

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti better than MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti?

• 3. 65 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
  5.63 TFLOPSvs1.98 TFLOPS
• 54.7 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
  96 GPixel/svs41.3 GPixel/s
• 114.1 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
  176 GTexels/svs61.9 GTexels/s
• 1.5x more VRAM?
  6GBvs4GB
• 224.4GB/s more memory bandwidth?
  336.5GB/svs112.1GB/s
• 256bit wider memory bus width?
  384bitvs128bit
• 2048 more shading units?
  2816vs768
• 4700million more transistors?
  8000 millionvs3300 million

Which are the most popular comparisons?

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

vs

Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti AMP

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon RX 560

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

vs

Zotac Gaming GeForce GTX 1630

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon Vega 8

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

vs

Manli GeForce GTX 1650

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

vs

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 OC

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 970

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

vs

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

1 User reviews

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

8. 0/10

1 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

0 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

0.0/10

0 User reviews

Features

Value for money

7.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

 

Gaming

8.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

 

Performance

8.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

 

Fan noise

9.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

 

Reliability

9.0/10

1 votes

No reviews yet

 

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1290MHz

1000MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1392MHz

1076MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3.pixel rate

41. 3 GPixel/s

96 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

1.98 TFLOPS

5.63 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

61.9 GTexels/s

176 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1752MHz

1753MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

7008MHz

7012MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

112.1GB/s

336.5GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

128bit

384bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti)

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti)

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

HDMI 2.0

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X vs MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB: What is the difference?

45points

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

48points

MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

Comparison winner

vs

54 facts in comparison

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

Why is MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X better than MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB?

• 224MHz faster GPU clock speed?
  1351MHzvs1127MHz
• 90W lower TDP?
  75Wvs165W
• 252MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
  1468MHzvs1216MHz
• 14nm smaller semiconductor size?
  14nmvs28nm
• Supports 3D?
• Has Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP)?
• 41mm narrower?
  229mmvs270mm
• 9mm shorter?
  131mmvs140mm

Why is MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB better than MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X?

• 2. 83 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
  4.9 TFLOPSvs2.08 TFLOPS
• 40.8 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
  84 GPixel/svs43.2 GPixel/s
• 104.2 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
  169 GTexels/svs64.8 GTexels/s
• 111.9GB/s more memory bandwidth?
  224GB/svs112.1GB/s
• 128bit wider memory bus width?
  256bitvs128bit
• 1280 more shading units?
  2048vs768
• 1900million more transistors?
  5200 millionvs3300 million
• 80 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
  128vs48

Which are the most popular comparisons?

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

vs

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060

MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 980 OC V1

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4GT

MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

vs

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

vs

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 970 Gaming

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

vs

Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

vs

Asus Strix GeForce GTX 980 DirectCU II OC

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

vs

AMD Radeon RX 480

MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

vs

EVGA GTX 1070 Ti Gaming

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

vs

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1650 OC

MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

vs

XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition OC+

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 1060 Gaming X

MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

vs

Palit GeForce GTX 1650 GamingPro GDDR6

MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

vs

Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1060 6GB

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

vs

Asus ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

vs

Asus Strix GeForce GTX 970 DirectCU II

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

vs

EVGA GeForce GTX 1060

Price comparison

Cheap alternatives

User reviews

Performance

1. GPU clock speed

1351MHz

1127MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1468MHz

1216MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3.pixel rate

43.2 GPixel/s

84 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

2.08 TFLOPS

4.9 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

64.8 GTexels/s

169 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1752MHz

1750MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

7008MHz

7012MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2. maximum memory bandwidth

112.1GB/s

224GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

128bit

256bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

✖MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

✔MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5. load GPU temperature

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB)

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

✖MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

✖MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

✖MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

✔MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

HDMI 2.0

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming 4GB)

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 980

1. Home
2. VGA Benchmarks
3. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 980

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  100%

• GeForce GTX 980

  173%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

90 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 980 .

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Supports PhysX

Supports G-Sync

Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)

Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 980

73% higher gaming performance.

Supports PhysX

Supports G-Sync

Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

---

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 980

The GeForce GTX 980 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (62 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration

	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti		GeForce GTX 980
GPU Name	GP107 (GP107-400-A1)	vs	GM204 (GM204-400-A1)
Fab Process	14 nm	vs	28 nm
Die Size	132 mm²	vs	398 mm²
Transistors	3,300 million	vs	5,200 million
Shaders	768	vs	2048
Compute Units	6	vs	16
Core clock	1290 MHz	vs	1127 MHz
ROPs	32	vs	64
TMUs	48	vs	128

Memory Configuration

	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti		GeForce GTX 980
Memory Type	GDDR5	vs	GDDR5
Bus Width	128 bit	vs	256 bit
Memory Speed	1752 MHz 7008 MHz effective	vs	1753 MHz 7012 MHz effective
Memory Size	4096 Mb	vs	4096 Mb

Additional details

	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti		GeForce GTX 980
TDP	75 watts	vs	165 watts
Release Date	25 Oct 2016	vs	19 Sep 2014

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  41. 30 GP/s

• GeForce GTX 980

  72.10 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  61.90 GT/s

• GeForce GTX 980

  144.30 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  112.10 GB/s

• GeForce GTX 980

  224.40 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  1981.40 GFLOPs

• GeForce GTX 980

  4616.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

DX11, Max Detail, 2xMSAA 16xAF

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  81

• GeForce GTX 980

  139

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xAA

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  42

• GeForce GTX 980

  80

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  49

• GeForce GTX 980

  80

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality,DX11, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  34

• GeForce GTX 980

  56

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra, TSSAA 8tx, ASync on, Vsync off, VULKAN, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  77

• GeForce GTX 980

  132

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  42

• GeForce GTX 980

  70

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX 11,Windows 10×64 build 1809

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  44

• GeForce GTX 980

  72

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Very High Settings

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  47

• GeForce GTX 980

  69

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  54

• GeForce GTX 980

  85

FPS (higher is better)

Very high Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  38

• GeForce GTX 980

  59

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  65

• GeForce GTX 980

  88

FPS (higher is better)

DX12, Ultra Quality, MSAA, 16x AF

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  43

• GeForce GTX 980

  62

FPS (higher is better)

Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  33

• GeForce GTX 980

  57

FPS (higher is better)

Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  44

• GeForce GTX 980

  91

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  41

• GeForce GTX 980

  76

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  30

• GeForce GTX 980

  52

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  39

• GeForce GTX 980

  73

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  50

• GeForce GTX 980

  81

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  42

• GeForce GTX 980

  76

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  38

• GeForce GTX 980

  60

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  37

• GeForce GTX 980

  67

FPS (higher is better)

DX12, Max Detail, FXAA, 16:1 AF

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  45

• GeForce GTX 980

  72

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  31

• GeForce GTX 980

  52

FPS (higher is better)

Main Leben! quality preset- Vulkan Windows 10×64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  34

• GeForce GTX 980

  64

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Detail, 2xMSAA 16xAF

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  62

• GeForce GTX 980

  97

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xAA

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  29

• GeForce GTX 980

  52

FPS (higher is better)

High Quality Mode, 8 millon samples, 2xMSAA, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  32

• GeForce GTX 980

  50

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  35

• GeForce GTX 980

  59

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality,DX11, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  31

• GeForce GTX 980

  43

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra, TSSAA 8tx, ASync on, Vsync off, VULKAN, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  51

• GeForce GTX 980

  83

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  28

• GeForce GTX 980

  47

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX 11,Windows 10×64 build 1809

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  30

• GeForce GTX 980

  53

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Very High Settings

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  31

• GeForce GTX 980

  49

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  35

• GeForce GTX 980

  55

FPS (higher is better)

Very high Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  29

• GeForce GTX 980

  44

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  43

• GeForce GTX 980

  61

FPS (higher is better)

DX12, Ultra Quality, MSAA, 16x AF

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  29

• GeForce GTX 980

  45

FPS (higher is better)

Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  19

• GeForce GTX 980

  34

FPS (higher is better)

Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  30

• GeForce GTX 980

  57

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Details, Pure Hair On, FXAA/HBAO+ enabled, 16x AF, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  30

• GeForce GTX 980

  56

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  19

• GeForce GTX 980

  34

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  29

• GeForce GTX 980

  53

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  32

• GeForce GTX 980

  54

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  30

• GeForce GTX 980

  54

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  29

• GeForce GTX 980

  48

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  27

• GeForce GTX 980

  48

FPS (higher is better)

DX12, Max Detail, FXAA, 16:1 AF

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  31

• GeForce GTX 980

  50

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  21

• GeForce GTX 980

  35

FPS (higher is better)

Main Leben! quality preset- Vulkan Windows 10×64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  26

• GeForce GTX 980

  35

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality,DX11, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  19

• GeForce GTX 980

  30

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  14

• GeForce GTX 980

  25

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX 11,Windows 10×64 build 1809

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  15

• GeForce GTX 980

  28

FPS (higher is better)

Very high Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  15

• GeForce GTX 980

  25

FPS (higher is better)

Very high quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  8

• GeForce GTX 980

  15

FPS (higher is better)

Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  8

• GeForce GTX 980

  28

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  10

• GeForce GTX 980

  17

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  17

• GeForce GTX 980

  32

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  16

• GeForce GTX 980

  28

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  17

• GeForce GTX 980

  31

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  11

• GeForce GTX 980

  28

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, Windows 10 x64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  10

• GeForce GTX 980

  19

FPS (higher is better)

Main Leben! quality preset- Vulkan Windows 10×64

• GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

  13

• GeForce GTX 980

  23

FPS (higher is better)

	VS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti		GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

	VS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti		GeForce GTX 1050

	VS
GeForce GTX 980		GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

	VS
GeForce GTX 980		Radeon RX 580

	VS
Radeon RX 5500		GeForce GTX 1660

	VS
GeForce GTX 1660		Radeon R9 Nano

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

log 13. 10:23:41

#0 checking url part for id 5986 +0s … 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6279 +0s … 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Sep 2022 17:26:57 +0200 +0s … 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.048s … 0.049s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 003s … 0.052s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.052s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.052s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.052s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.052s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.052s

#11 composed specs +0s … 0.052s

#12 did output specs +0s … 0.052s

#13 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.052s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.03s … 0.082s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.082s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s … 0.086s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 5986 +0s … 0.086s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.087s

#19 got single benchmarks 5986 +0.014s … 0.1s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s . .. 0.103s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.103s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.103s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.103s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.103s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.103s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.103s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.105s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.105s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.105s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.105s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.105s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.105s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.105s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0. 105s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.105s

#36 getting avg benchmarks for device 6279 +0s … 0.105s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.105s

#38 got single benchmarks 6279 +0.008s … 0.113s

#39 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s … 0.113s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.114s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.114s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.115s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.115s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.116s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.116s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.116s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.116s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.117s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0. 117s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.117s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.117s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.118s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.118s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.118s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.118s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.118s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.118s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.118s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.118s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.119s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.119s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.119s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.119s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.119s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.119s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.119s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.119s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.119s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.12s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.12s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.12s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.121s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.121s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.121s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.121s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.121s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.121s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.121s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.122s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.122s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.122s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.122s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.122s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.122s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.122s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.123s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.123s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.124s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.124s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.125s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.125s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.126s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.126s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.127s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.128s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.128s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.128s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.129s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.129s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.13s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.13s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.131s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.131s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.132s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.132s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.132s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.133s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.133s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.134s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s … 0.134s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.135s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s … 0.135s

#113 min, max, avg, median took s +0s . .. 0.135s

#114 before gaming benchmark output +0s … 0.135s

#115 Got 872 rows for game benchmarks. +0.027s … 0.163s

#116 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s … 0.163s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0. 163s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.163s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.163s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.164s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#173 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#174 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#176 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#177 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#178 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#183 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.164s

#184 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#186 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#187 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#189 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#190 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#191 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#193 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#194 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#195 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#196 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#197 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.164s

#198 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#199 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#200 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#201 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#202 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#203 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#204 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#205 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#206 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#207 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#208 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#209 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#210 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#211 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.164s

#212 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#213 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#214 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#215 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#216 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#217 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#218 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#219 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#220 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#221 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#222 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#223 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#224 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#225 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.165s

#226 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#227 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#228 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#229 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#230 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#231 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#232 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#233 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#234 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#235 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#236 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#237 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#238 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#239 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.165s

#240 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#241 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#242 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#243 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#244 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#245 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#246 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#247 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#248 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#249 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#250 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#251 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#252 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#253 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.165s

#254 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#255 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#256 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#257 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#258 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#259 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#260 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#261 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#262 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#263 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#264 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#265 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#266 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#267 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.165s

#268 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#269 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#270 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#271 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#272 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#273 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#274 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#275 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#276 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#277 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#278 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#279 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#280 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#281 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.165s

#282 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#283 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#284 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#285 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#286 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#287 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#288 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#289 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#290 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#291 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#292 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#293 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#294 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#295 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.166s

#296 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#297 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#298 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#299 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#300 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#301 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#302 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#303 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#304 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#305 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#306 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#307 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#308 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#309 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.166s

#310 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#311 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#312 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#313 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#314 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#315 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#316 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#317 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#318 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#319 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#320 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#321 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#322 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#323 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.166s

#324 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#325 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#326 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#327 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#328 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#329 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#330 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#331 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#332 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#333 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#334 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#335 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#336 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#337 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.166s

#338 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#339 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#340 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#341 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#342 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#343 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#344 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#345 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#346 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#347 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#348 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#349 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#350 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#351 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.167s

#352 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#353 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#354 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#355 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#356 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#357 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#358 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#359 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#360 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#361 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#362 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#363 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#364 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#365 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.167s

#366 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#367 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#368 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#369 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#370 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#371 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#372 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#373 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#374 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#375 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#376 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#377 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#378 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#379 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.167s

#380 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#381 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#382 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#383 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#384 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#385 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#386 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#387 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#388 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#389 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#390 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#391 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#392 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#393 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.167s

#394 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#395 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#396 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#397 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#398 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#399 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#400 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#401 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#402 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#403 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#404 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#405 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#406 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#407 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.167s

#408 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#409 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#410 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#411 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#412 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#413 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#414 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#415 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#416 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#417 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#418 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#419 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#420 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#421 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.168s

#422 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#423 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#424 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#425 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#426 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#427 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#428 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#429 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#430 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#431 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#432 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#433 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#434 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#435 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.168s

#436 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#437 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#438 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#439 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#440 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#441 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#442 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#443 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#444 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#445 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#446 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#447 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#448 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#449 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.168s

#450 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#451 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#452 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#453 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#454 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#455 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#456 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#457 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#458 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#459 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#460 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#461 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#462 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#463 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.168s

#464 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#465 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#466 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#467 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#468 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#469 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#470 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#471 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#472 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#473 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#474 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#475 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#476 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#477 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.168s

#478 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#479 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#480 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#481 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#482 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#483 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#484 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#485 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#486 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#487 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#488 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#489 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#490 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#491 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.168s

#492 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#493 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#494 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#495 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#496 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#497 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#498 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#499 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#500 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#501 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#502 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#503 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#504 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#505 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.169s

#506 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#507 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#508 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#509 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#510 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#511 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#512 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#513 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#514 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#515 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#516 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#517 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#518 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#519 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.169s

#520 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#521 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#522 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#523 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#524 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#525 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#526 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#527 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#528 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#529 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#530 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#531 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#532 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#533 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.169s

#534 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#535 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#536 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#537 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#538 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#539 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#540 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#541 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#542 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#543 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#544 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#545 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#546 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#547 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.169s

#548 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#549 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#550 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#551 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#552 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#553 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#554 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#555 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#556 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#557 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#558 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#559 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#560 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#561 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.169s

#562 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#563 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#564 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#565 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#566 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#567 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#568 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#569 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#570 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.169s

#571 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#572 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#573 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#574 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#575 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.17s

#576 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#577 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#578 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#579 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#580 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#581 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#582 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#583 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#584 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#585 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#586 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#587 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#588 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#589 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#590 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.17s

#591 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#592 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#593 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#594 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#595 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#596 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#597 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#598 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#599 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#600 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#601 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#602 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#603 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#604 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#605 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.17s

#606 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#607 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#608 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#609 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#610 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#611 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#612 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#613 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#614 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#615 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#616 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#617 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#618 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#619 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#620 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.17s

#621 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#622 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#623 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#624 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#625 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#626 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#627 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#628 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#629 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#630 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#631 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#632 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#633 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#634 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#635 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.17s

#636 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#637 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#638 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#639 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#640 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#641 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#642 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#643 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#644 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#645 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#646 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.17s

#647 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#648 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#649 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0. 171s

#650 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#651 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#652 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#653 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#654 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#655 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#656 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#657 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#658 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#659 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#660 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#661 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#662 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#663 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.171s

#664 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#665 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#666 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#667 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#668 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#669 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#670 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#671 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#672 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#673 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#674 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#675 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#676 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#677 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.171s

#678 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#679 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#680 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#681 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#682 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#683 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#684 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#685 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#686 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#687 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#688 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#689 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#690 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#691 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.171s

#692 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#693 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#694 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#695 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#696 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#697 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.171s

#698 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#699 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#700 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#701 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#702 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#703 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#704 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#705 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.172s

#706 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#707 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#708 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#709 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#710 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#711 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#712 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#713 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#714 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#715 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#716 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#717 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#718 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#719 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.172s

#720 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#721 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#722 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#723 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#724 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#725 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#726 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#727 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#728 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#729 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#730 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#731 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#732 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#733 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.172s

#734 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#735 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#736 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#737 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#738 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.172s

#739 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#740 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#741 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#742 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#743 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#744 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#745 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#746 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#747 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.173s

#748 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#749 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#750 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#751 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#752 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#753 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#754 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#755 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#756 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#757 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#758 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#759 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#760 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#761 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.173s

#762 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#763 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#764 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#765 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#766 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#767 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#768 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#769 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#770 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#771 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#772 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#773 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#774 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#775 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.173s

#776 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#777 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#778 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#779 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#780 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#781 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#782 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#783 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#784 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#785 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#786 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#787 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#788 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#789 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.173s

#790 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#791 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#792 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#793 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#794 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#795 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#796 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#797 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#798 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#799 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#800 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#801 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#802 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#803 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.173s

#804 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#805 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#806 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#807 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#808 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#809 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.173s

#810 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#811 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#812 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#813 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#814 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#815 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#816 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#817 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.174s

#818 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#819 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#820 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#821 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#822 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#823 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#824 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#825 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#826 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#827 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#828 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#829 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#830 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#831 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.174s

#832 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#833 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#834 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#835 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#836 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#837 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#838 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#839 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#840 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#841 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#842 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#843 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#844 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#845 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.174s

#846 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#847 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#848 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#849 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#850 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#851 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#852 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#853 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#854 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#855 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#856 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#857 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#858 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#859 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.174s

#860 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#861 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#862 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#863 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#864 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#865 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#866 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.174s

#867 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#868 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#869 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#870 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#871 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.175s

#872 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s … 0.18s

#873 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 042s … 0.223s

#874 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s … 0.228s

#875 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s … 0.232s

#876 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.232s

#877 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.232s

#878 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.232s

#879 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.232s

#880 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.233s

#881 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.233s

#882 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.233s

#883 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.233s

#884 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.233s

#885 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.234s

#886 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.234s

#887 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.234s

#888 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.234s

#889 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.234s

#890 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.234s

#891 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.234s

#892 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.234s

#893 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.234s

#894 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.235s

#895 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.235s

#896 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.235s

#897 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.235s

#898 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.235s

#899 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.236s

#900 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.236s

#901 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.236s

#902 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.236s

#903 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.236s

#904 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.236s

#905 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.236s

#906 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.236s

#907 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.236s

#908 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.237s

#909 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.237s

#910 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.237s

#911 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.237s

#912 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.237s

#913 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.237s

#914 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.237s

#915 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.238s

#916 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.238s

#917 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.238s

#918 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.238s

#919 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.238s

#920 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.239s

#921 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.239s

#922 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.239s

#923 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.239s

#924 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.239s

#925 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.24s

#926 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.24s

#927 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.24s

#928 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.24s

#929 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.24s

#930 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.24s

#931 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.24s

#932 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.24s

#933 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.24s

#934 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.242s

#935 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.242s

#936 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.242s

#937 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.242s

#938 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.243s

#939 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.243s

#940 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.243s

#941 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.243s

#942 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.243s

#943 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.243s

#944 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.243s

#945 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.243s

#946 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.245s

#947 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.245s

#948 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.245s

#949 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.245s

#950 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.246s

#951 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.246s

#952 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.246s

#953 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.246s

#954 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.247s

#955 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.247s

#956 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.247s

#957 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.247s

#958 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.248s

#959 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.248s

#960 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.248s

#961 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.248s

#962 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s … 0.254s

#963 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s … 0.258s

#964 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.26s

#965 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.263s

#966 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.263s

#967 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s … 0.267s

#968 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.268s

#969 benchmarks composed for output. +0s … 0.268s

#970 calculated avg scores. +0s … 0.268s

#971 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 002s … 0.269s

#972 return log +0.002s … 0.272s

NVidia GTX 980 vs NVidia GTX 970 graphics card comparison

The GM204 GPU (which lies behind both the 980 and the 970) is the culmination of a process that started many months ago, with the GTX 750 Ti. As an overall package, we didn’t really rate the 750 Ti. While it generated a very impressive amount of speed given its low power output, in terms of realworld performance it offered customers very little they couldn’t get from existing products at a similar price point. We could, though, see where the company was going with the GM204. (See all
graphics cards and components reviews.)

With its ultra-efficient design, the GM204 clearly had room to expand and create very powerful gaming equipment for a modest power outlay. And the 980 and 970 are the spectacular proof. So let’s start by taking a closer look at what the new GPUs offer.

NVidia GTX 980 vs NVidia GTX 970 comparison: Smaller is Better – Or is It?

Like the older Kepler range, the Maxwell GPUs are constructed using a 0. 28nm manufacturing process. We would generally expect this process to have shrunk in size by now, as the number typically falls every two years, producing smaller and more efficient designs that generate less heat, and which can be pushed to higher power levels.

Unfortunately, the two-year cycle has been held up this time round, which is partly why nVidia has worked so hard on streamlining the way the technology itself works. It’s rather like a town that has consistently expanded in size every two years for over a decade. If the town temporarily runs out of expansion space, the planners have to work instead on making the town itself work better, redirecting traffic more efficiently, and allowing the flow to continue unimpeded.

The key to this reorganisation is the enhanced SMM (Streaming Multiprocessor Maxwell). The older Kepler GPUs already made use of the cleverly tweaked SMX (Streaming Multiprocessor neXt generation), but SMMs take this to a whole new level. Each individual SMM is much smaller, meaning that instructions can be handled with greater efficiency. Inevitably, though, this means that single SMMs are armed with fewer weapons than their SMX counterparts.

So whereas a standard SMX, for instance, contains 192 shader cores, the humble SMM contains just 128. There’s a knock-on effect on texture units too, with each SMM offering a mere eight of these, against the 16 of the SMX.

The first Maxwell-equipped product we looked at, the 750 Ti, came with five SMMs enabled. These allowed it to offer 640 shader cores and 40 texture units. In contrast, the 970 and 980 are considerably beefed up, with 13 and 16 SMMs switched on respectively. So that gives the 970 1664 shader cores, and 104 texture units, while the 980 has 2048 shader cores, and 128 texture units. The 980, as you would expect, has more of both, although the differences are not massive, given the price jump.

It’s also notable that both chips pale next to the figures boasted by, for example, the GTX 780 Ti. The latter’s 15 bumper-packed SMXes ultimately add up to far bigger numbers, with a rather massive complement of 2880 shader cores and 240 texture units – the 780 Ti costs a similar price to the 970, but has 73% more shader cores and 130% more texture units overall.

Luckily, Maxwell is about far more than simple firepower. Compared to SMXes, SMMs will have to share far fewer resources with one another. And while it’s no surprise to find both the 970 and 980 armed with 4GB of GDDR5 RAM as default – their predecessors often went up to no more than 3GB – the L1 and L2 caches have been considerably bolstered.

The shared memory now stands at 96KB for every SMM, and the Kepler’s 512KB L2 cache has been quadrupled in size to a 2MB version in the 970 and 980. These ultra-fast forms of memory can now be used more efficiently and more consistently by Maxwell, so there should be fewer blockages and faster flow as a result. Again, the 980 has a small advantage here, although the 970 is hardly crippled in contrast. See all
PC Components and Upgrades reviews.

NVidia GTX 980 vs NVidia GTX 970 comparison: Memory Bandwidth

You might expect the 980 and 970 to offer strong memory bandwidth. Unfortunately, the 384bit memory bus offered by the earlier GTX 780 Ti has been reduced to a 256bit version in the case of both the 980 and 970. However, Maxwell does have one slick trick up its pipline – the Third Generation Delta Color Compression.

This concept has been seen in AMD products before, but is relatively new to the mainstream nVidia products, and uses compression to allow the memory bus to process more data without causing a bottleneck. The end-result is that the new cards’ 256bit memory interface proves not to be the bar to high-performance that you’d think it to be. (See also:
NVidia GTX 970 vs NVidia GTX 780 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 290X comparison.)

The main idea behind Maxwell is that it does rather more with considerably less. As such, it doesn’t perhaps fare well in terms of raw figures. That’s particularly so when we look at memory bandwidth calculations. The standard GTX 980 and GTX 970 both come with memory clocks of 1.75GHz (effectively 7GHz when you take into account the quadrupling properties of the RAM). Those 7GHz speeds place them on a par with the 780 Ti. However, the 256bit memory buses of the 980 and 970 push them back on paper, leaving them both with memory bandwidth figures of 224GB/sec.

In comparison, the 780 Ti comes with a gargantuan bandwidth figure of 336GB/sec. Of course, as we’ve already noted, the 980 and 970 use special compression to optimise the memory bandwidth, and those effects won’t be reflected in the raw figures. So we’ll have to reserve judgement for now. It’s interesting, though, that nVidia have made so little attempt to differentiate the 980 and 970 here, with both having essentially identical bandwith figures.

NVidia GTX 980 vs NVidia GTX 970 comparison: Clock Speeds and Textures

One of the beauties of Maxwell’s smaller and more efficient Streaming Multiprocessors is that they can be pushed to higher clock speeds. Using Boost, the standard GTX 980 and 970 can reach core clock speeds of 1216MHz and 1178MHz respectively. This is clearly much higher than the GTX 780 Ti’s 928MHz. Once more, though, the 980 is only marginally superior to the 970.

And that extra firepower doesn’t help everywhere, with the older 780 Ti arguably proving the better card at handling textures, by dint of having greater quantities of texture units. The 980 has a relatively healthy 128 of these, and the 970 falls some way behind with 104. The 970’s figure, in particular, is poor when you compare it to the older 780 Ti’s 240 texture units.

However, neither new Maxwell chip fares brilliantly here. Unsurprisingly, the 980’s texture fill rate of 155.6GT/sec rather destroys the 970’s 122.5GT/sec, but both lag some way behind the 780 Ti’s astonishing figure of 222.7GT/sec. Again, the raw results probably don’t do justice to Maxwell’s heavily fine-tuned architecture. But we’ll have to wait and see whether these chips can overhaul the on-paper advantage of the previous generation.

NVidia GTX 980 vs NVidia GTX 970 comparison: Low in Power but High in Choice

But before we dive into the realworld results, why would nVidia want to turn out technology that, on paper at least, seems so inferior to the flagships of the previous generation? Well, Maxwell does have one very obvious advantage. And that comes from the power output. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) figure gives us an indication of how much power a system is likely to have to cope with, when using this card. The lower the better. The GTX 970 comes with an incredbly modest TDP of 145 watts. As a point of comparison, even the mid-range GTX 760 came with a TDP of 170 watts, so the GTX 970 is extremely low on power consumption for a product that can produce this level of performance.

Perhaps even more astonishing, though, is the 980, which comes with a TDP of 165 watts – still lower than that aforementioned GTX 760. This is an incredible achievement, and is put very much into perspective by the corresponding figures for the GTX 780 Ti and Radeon R9 290X, which measure 250 and 300 watts respectively!  In practise, we found that the Maxwell cards weren’t quite as modest on power as this might suggest. But under load, the R9 290X was generating around 72 watts more than the 980, which was itself around 17 watts higher than the 970.

NVidia GTX 980 vs NVidia GTX 970 comparison: Benchmark Tests

All the hardware advantages in the world won’t help you, though, if the realworld performance isn’t there. How do these cards really operate? To find out, we’ve pitted them against one another across four different games, taking in default settings, and three separate resolutions. For the sake of comparison, we’ve set them against the figures of the Kepler-equipped 780 Ti.

NVidia GTX 980 vs NVidia GTX 970 comparison: Crysis 3

As you might expect, the 980 is the superior card, commanding a lead of 15fps over the 970 at 1900×1200. The gap has fallen to 9.5fps by the time we reach a resolution of 3840×2160, although as a percentage of the frame rate, this is actually a bigger lead for the 980. The 780 Ti is a little faster than the 970, but still 9.4fps down on the 980 at the lowest resolution, and 6.3fps behind at the highest level.

NVidia GTX 980 vs NVidia GTX 970 comparison: Bioshock Infinite Rage

Again, the 980 is very much in charge at 1920×1080, leading the 970 by 15.4fps. However, the lead is a mere 6.1fps at 3840×2160. The 780 Ti is even closer by this point, finishing just 4. 3fps behind the 980, and 1.8fps ahead of the 970. However, at the lowest resolution, it trails the 980 by 11.8fps, and leads the 970 by as many as 3.6fps.

NVidia GTX 980 vs NVidia GTX 970 comparison: Battlefield 4

The 980 retains a double-digit lead over the 970 all the way through, although the gap remains almost identical throughout, tallying 10.4fps at the lowest 1900×1200 resolution, but rising merely to 10.5fps at 3840×2160. Again, though, viewed as a percentage, this is a significantly increased lead, given that the frame rates have almost halved at this point. The 780 Ti trails the 980 by 7.9fps at 1900×1200, and by 6.4fps at 3840×2160. It has a smaller though decisive lead over the 970, finishing 2.5fps ahead at 1900×1200, and 4.1fps at 3840×2160.

NVidia GTX 980 vs NVidia GTX 970 comparison: Thief

In our final set, the 980 achieves a lead of 11.5fps over the 970 at 1920×1080, and this falls to 6.5fps at 3840×2160. The 780 Ti has a smaller 1.4fps lead over the 970 at 1920×1080, and this increases to a still fairly minor 2. 4fps at 3840×2160. However, even the mighty 980 isn’t very far ahead, recording a lead over the 780 Ti at the lowest resolution of 9.1fps, and seeing this fall to 4.1fps at 3840×2160. This is a fairly difficult set of tests, and the overall figures are so low that there isn’t that much variation between the three cards.

NVidia GTX 980 vs NVidia GTX 970 comparison: Verdict

So do you go for a 980 or a 970? Well, the 980 is the best single-GPU solution out there (watch out for more high-end comparisons), and will provide you with as much power as you need from one card. In terms of benchmarks, the 970 seems rather disappointing. However, it’s worth bearing in mind that the 970 could cost you £150 or more less. For typical gamers, the 970 will more than suffice, and is a better alternative to the Radeon R9 290X. Don’t discount the 780 Ti, as this is faster than the 970, and can be bought for only a small amount extra. However, assuming that one becomes unavailable, the 970 is the best mid-price option.

For more hardened players with plenty of money, the 980 is the one to really set their sights on, and will give them the best single-GPU card on the market.

NVidia GTX 980 vs NVidia GTX 970 comparison: Available Cards

GTX 980

£430 – Inno3D GeForce GTX 980 Herculez X3 Ultra – 4GB, Core Clock 1,152MHz (1,253MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7010MHz, 2yr Warranty
£430 – GALAX GeForce GTX 980 SOC Gamer – 4GB, Core Clock 1,127MHz (1,216MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7010MHz, 2yr Warranty
£440 – MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming Edition 4096MB – 4GB, Core Clock 1,216MHz (1,317MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7010MHz, 3yr Warranty
£450 – Palit GeForce GTX 980 JetStream – 4GB, Core Clock 1,127MHz (1,216MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7010MHz, 2yr Warranty
£456 – Gigabyte GeForce GTX 980 Reference Design – 4GB, Core Clock 1,127MHz (1,216MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7010MHz, 3yr Warranty
£480 – Zotac GeForce GTX 980 AMP Omega Edition – 4GB, Core Clock 1,202MHz (1,304MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7046MHz, 5yr Warranty
£500 – Asus GeForce GTX 980 DirectCU II OC Strx – 4GB, Core Clock 1,178MHz (1,279MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7010MHz, 3yr Warranty
£500 – EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Superlock ACX 2. 0 – 4GB, Core Clock 1,266MHz (1,367MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7010MHz, 3yr Warranty

Verdict – Of the cheaper cards, the MSI seems to be the best choice. Only £10 off the bottom tag, it nonetheless has a Boost of 1317MHz, giving it a very significant advantage over the 1216MHz of the standard cards. For ultimate power, the EVGA version goes right up to 1367MHz, although the MSI is better value.

GTX 970

£276 – GALAX GeForce GTX 970 EX OC – 4GB, Core Clock 1,126MHz (1,266MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7010MHz, 2yr Warranty
£276 – Inno3D GeForce GTX 970 OC – 4GB, Core Clock 1,088MHz (1,228MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7010MHz, 2yr Warranty
£290 – Palit GeForce GTX 970 JetStream – 4GB, Core Clock 1,152MHz (1,304MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7010MHz, 2yr Warranty
£294 – MSI GeForce GTX 970 Gaming Edition – 4GB, Core Clock 1,140MHz (1,279MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7010MHz, 3yr Warranty
£308 – Zotac GeForce GTX 970 AMP Omega Edition – 4GB, Core Clock 1,102MHz (1,241MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7046MHz, 5yr Warranty
£308 – EVGA GeForce GTX 970 SC ACX 2. 0 – 4GB, Core Clock 1,165MHz (1,317MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7010MHz, 3yr Warranty
£312 – Asus GeForce GTX 970 DirectCU II OC Strix – 4GB, Core Clock 1,114MHz (1,253MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7010MHz, 3yr Warranty
£320 – Gigabyte GeForce GTX 970 G1 Gaming – 4GB, Core Clock 1,178MHz (1,329MHz Boost), Memory Clock DDR Effective 7010MHz, 3yr Warranty

Verdict – With this card, the key is very much getting value, and the £290 Palit offers plenty of power (a 1304MHz Boost clock) for its modest price. You can get an extra 25MHz from the £320 Gigabyte, but there’s no need to pay more than £290-£294 for the impressive Palit and MSI versions. See all
graphics card reviews.

Specs

NVidia GTX 980 vs NVidia GTX 970: Specs

• nVidia GeForce GTX 980: 4GB
• GM204 (Maxwell)
• 5.2 billion
• 28nm
• 1126MHz (Boost to 1216MHz)
• 1.75GHz (7GHz)
• 256bit
• 224GB/sec
• 16 SMMs enabled
• 2048
• 128
• 64
• 1/32 FP32
• 155. 6GT/sec
• 165 watts. nVidia GeForce GTX 970: 4GB
• 1050MHz (Boost to 1178MHz)
• 13 SMMs enabled
• 1664
• 104
• 122.5GT/sec
• 145 watts

0024 4.6 TFLOPS vs 1.98 TFLOPS

30.8 GPixel/s higher pixel rate? higher number of textured pixels? more memory bandwidth?
224GB/s vs 112.1GB/s

128bit wider memory bus?
256bit vs 128bit

1280 more stream processors?
2048 vs 768

1900million more transistors?
5200 million vs 3300 million

80 more texture units (TMUs)?
128 vs 48

• GPU frequency 164MHz higher?
  1290MHz vs 1126MHz
• 90W below TDP?
  75W vs 165W
• 176MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
  1392MHz vs 1216MHz
• 20°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
  61°C vs 81°C
• Is 14nm smaller?
  14nm vs 28nm
• Has DPFP?
• 3°C lower GPU idle temperature?
  29°C vs 32°C
• 100mm narrower?
  166mm vs 266mm

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

vs

XFX HD 6950 XXX 1GB

Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

vs

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti GAMING X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 3050 Laptop

Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

FX0003

Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 670

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

vs

Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

80

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070

Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

vs

PNY GeForce GTX 1660 Super Single Fan

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

vs

Nvidia Tesla C2050

Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

vs

AMD Radeon RX 550

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 970

Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX 9003

vs

0004 Palit GeForce GTX 1650 Stormx OC

Comers of prices

cheaper

users reviews

Productivity

1. TECH FRISTICATION GP

1126MHz

1290MHZ

GPU graphic processor (GPU) has a higher frequency.

2.turbo GPU

1216MHz

1392MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel rate

72.1 GPixel/s

41.3 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4.flops

4.6 TFLOPS

1.98 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

144 GTexels/s

61.9 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1753MHz

1752MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7. shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

7012MHz

7008MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the size and data transfer rate of the memory. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2. max memory bandwidth

224GB/s

112.1GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

128bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5. GDDR memory versions

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

6. Supports memory debug code

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

✖Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

2nd version of OpenGL

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

✔Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5.GPU Temperature at Boot

Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

✖Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

✔Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

✖Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1.has HDMI output

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 980

✔Palit GeForce GTX 1050 Ti StormX

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to an attached display.

2.HDMI connectors

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980)

More HDMI connections allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

3rd HDMI version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 980)

HDMI 2.0

New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

Price match

Cancel

Which graphics cards are better?

Radeon RX 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Radeon RX 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q — Th200

Contents

1. Introduction
2. Features
3. Tests
4. Key differences
5. Conclusion
6. Comments

Video card

Video card

Introduction

We compared two graphics cards: AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.

The AMD Radeon RX 5300M is a Mobility Radeon (Navi) generation RDNA 1.0 graphics card released on Nov 13th, 2019. It comes with 3GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1750MHz and consumes up to 85W.

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is a Pascal architecture GeForce 10 Mobile generation graphics card released Jan 3rd, 2018. It comes with 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at 1752MHz and consumes up to 75W.

Features

Graphics Card

Name

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1050 TI Max-Q

Release

9000.03

JAN 3RD, 2018

PCIE 3.0 X16

Graphics Processor

Crystal size

158 MM²

132 MM²

Cabbage 9000. 9000 GB/S

112.1 GB/S

TheReratIn PERFORTIRAL0136

Pixels filling speed

46. 24 GPIXEL/S

41.31 GPIXEL/S

Filling the textures

127.2 GTEXEL/S

61.97 GTEXEL/S

FP16 (HALF) PERFORMANCE 8.13 TFORMA

30.98 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP32 (float) performance

4.069 TFLOPS

1.983 TFLOPS

FP64 (double) performance

254.3 GFLOPS (1:16)

61.97 GFLOPS (1:32)

Clock Speeds

Graphics Features

DirectX

12 (12_1)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

4.6

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

Cuda

6.1

Vulkan

1.2

1.2

Board Design

Heating

85W

75W

Power Connectors

None

None

Tests

9000 RP

RP is a test created by Th200. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.

AMD Radeon RX 5300M
+48%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Blender bmw27

Blender is the most popular program for creating 3D content. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Key Differences

Why is AMD Radeon RX 5300M better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q?

Newer — 1 year later release

Has 48% better performance

More modern manufacturing process — 7 nm vs 14 nm

More advanced memory type — GDDR6 vs GDDR5

Has 50% more bandwidth — 168.0 GB/s vs 112.1 GB/s

Has 12% faster pixel fill rate — 46.24 GPixel/s vs 41.31 GPixel/s

Has 106% higher texture fill rate — 127.2 GTexel/s vs 61.97 GTexel/s

Has 640 more texture units +40

Has 640 more shading units AMD Radeon RX 5300M?

Uses 12% less power — 75W vs 85W

Has 1GB more memory

Has a slightly larger memory bus

Conclusion

Which is better Radeon RX 5300M or GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q?

The Radeon RX 5300M delivers 48% better performance, consumes up to 14% more energy and holds 1 GB less memory. Radeon RX 5300M 3990X is more powerful than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q according to our research.

What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to Radeon RX 5300M?

The Radeon RX 470 Mobile is AMD’s closest competitor to the Radeon RX 5300M. It is 1% more powerful, uses the same amount of energy, and holds 5 GB less memory.

What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to Radeon RX 5300M?

The GeForce GTX 980M is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the Radeon RX 5300M. It is 15% more powerful, and holds 5 GB less memory.

How does Radeon RX 5300M perform compared to GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and other graphics cards?

Relative performance

Total performance

Mobile performance

Named system requirements role-playing action Steelrising

Simple Jack

September 5

News

The gamer will have to fight the army of automatons (robots) of King Louis XVIII.

To run the game, you need a PC with the following settings.

• Operating system: Windows 10.
• CPU: Intel Core i7-3770 or AMD Ryzen 5 1400.
• RAM: 8 GB.
• Graphics adapter: GeForce RTX 2060 with 6 GB VRAM.
• Free space on HDD/SSD: 67 GB.
• DirectX 12.

For a comfortable game you need a more powerful computer.

• Operating system: Windows 10.
• CPU: Intel Core i7-8700 or AMD Ryzen 5 3600X.
• RAM: 16 GB.
• Graphics adapter: GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER or GeForce RTX 3060 Ti with 8GB VRAM.
• Free space on HDD/SSD: 67 GB.
• DirectX 12.

Steelrising will be released on September 8, 2022. The game is being developed by Spiders, known for Greedfall, Of Orcs and Men and The Technomancer.

Source

September 7,
|
Consoles

Media: Microsoft started to refund money for pre-order S. T.A.L.K.E.R. 2

today at 09:52
|
Industry

The development of Assassin’s Creed Red in the Japanese setting is under threat, the team refuses to work because of the manager

September 9

DC Comics revealed the real name of the Joker

yesterday at 19:55
|
PC

A new mod for Fallout 4 completely overhauls the mechanics of the game, making it deeper, more logical and more enjoyable

September 7,
|
PC

Mundfish updated Atomic Heart 9 system requirements0003

yesterday at 16:19
|
Trailers

A small gameplay video of the strategic action game Aliens: Dark Descent

8 September
|
Movies and series

The Boys showrunner advised toxic viewers to eat a bag of reproductive organs

yesterday at 18:49
|
Industry

Ubisoft wants to make more focused games rather than having «one game do it all»

September 11

Assassin’s Creed Mirage was rated Mature Only for violence, gore and sexuality in the Xbox Store

September 6
|
Updates

Graphic Improvements, New Content and Mod Tool: Cyberpunk 2077 Patch 1.