Hd 7770 vs r7 260x: Radeon R7 260X vs HD 7770 [in 2 benchmarks]

AMD Radeon R7 260X vs Asus HD 7770: What is the difference?

34points

AMD Radeon R7 260X

34points

Asus HD 7770

vs

54 facts in comparison

AMD Radeon R7 260X

Asus HD 7770

Why is AMD Radeon R7 260X better than Asus HD 7770?

  • 100MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    1100MHzvs1000MHz
  • 0.69 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    1.97 TFLOPSvs1.28 TFLOPS
  • 1.6 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    17.6 GPixel/svs16 GPixel/s
  • 500MHz faster memory clock speed?
    1625MHzvs1125MHz
  • 2000MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    6500MHzvs4500MHz
  • 2x more VRAM?
    2GBvs1GB
  • 21.6 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    61.6 GTexels/svs40 GTexels/s
  • 32GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    104GB/svs72GB/s

Why is Asus HD 7770 better than AMD Radeon R7 260X?

  • 35W lower TDP?
    80Wvs115W
  • Has Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP)?
  • 3 more displays supported?
    6vs3

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

Gigabyte Radeon RX 550

Asus HD 7770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

AMD Radeon R7 360

Asus HD 7770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Asus HD 7770

vs

AMD Radeon RX 550

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

AMD Radeon R5

Asus HD 7770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

AMD Radeon Vega 8

Asus HD 7770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

AMD Radeon R9 270X

Asus HD 7770

vs

AMD Radeon HD 6670

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Asus HD 7770

vs

Asus GeForce GTX 650

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

MSI Radeon RX 580

Asus HD 7770

vs

AMD Radeon R7 370

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

Zotac GeForce GTX 660

Asus HD 7770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

AMD Radeon RX 460

Asus HD 7770

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 950 Gaming

Price comparison

User reviews

Performance

1. GPU clock speed

1100MHz

1000MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon R7 260X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Asus HD 7770)

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3.pixel rate

17.6 GPixel/s

16 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

1.97 TFLOPS

1.28 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

61.6 GTexels/s

40 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1625MHz

1125MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

6500MHz

4500MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2. maximum memory bandwidth

104GB/s

72GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

128bit

128bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Radeon R7 260X

✖Asus HD 7770

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔AMD Radeon R7 260X

✔Asus HD 7770

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon R7 260X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Asus HD 7770)

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon R7 260X

✖Asus HD 7770

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔AMD Radeon R7 260X

✔Asus HD 7770

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon R7 260X

✖Asus HD 7770

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon R7 260X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Asus HD 7770)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon R7 260X

✔Asus HD 7770

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Asus HD 7770)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

HDMI 1.4

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Asus HD 7770)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5. DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition & HD 7750 Review

Article Type: 

Article

Teaser Icon: 

System Specs

I have updated my resting rig, and moved from an Intel Core i7-920 to an i7-2600k. As before, everything runs at stock clock speeds. I have also increased RAM from 12GB to 16GB. All cards were tested with the Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition release drivers.

  • Windows 7
  • ASUS P8Z68-V Pro/Gen3
  • Intel i7 2600k at 4×3.4GHz
  • 16GB G.Skill DDR3 1.25v low-voltage RAM
  • 2x Samsung 320GB T-Series HDD (one for the OS and games; one for swap file and FRAPS)
  • LG Super Multi Blu (HD-DVD/Blu-Ray Player)
  • Onboard audio
  • Corsair HX1000
  • My Open PC Dragon Case
  • Logitch K340 Keyboard & Performance MX Mouse
  • Ergotech Heavy Duty Triple Desk Stand — WSGF Edition
  • 3x Dell U2211H IPS 16:9 1920×1080 Displays
Hardware Tested

I only have AMD hardware tested for comparison in this review. This is not for lack of wanting to test NVIDIA hardware in Surround, but NVIDIA has not yet decided to support the WSGF with hardware for review and benchmarking. Considering that the WSGF is a hobby that just supports itself, I cannot justify spending the money needed to test NVIDIA cards.

Most of my time is spent working on the site (or other projects), and much of my «play time» is spent benchmarking. Cards would basically only be used for testing, and I cannot reconcile purchasing cards that would only be used for testing. It’s simply not a good ROI.

Resolutions Tested

I tested both 1600×900 and 1920×1080 in widescreen, as well as 4800×900 and 5760×1080 in 3×1-L Eyefinity. I only tested Eyefinity on the Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition. The Radeon HD 7750 comes with a mismatched set of ports, and is really not designed for Eyefinity (IMHO).

Games Tested

I have overhauled my suite of games. I replaced some older titles with their sequels, and I’ve simply dropped some titles either due to age or the time needed to benchmark. Additionally, I’ve dropped the DX9 and DX10 tests from the Heaven demo.

  • Aliens vs. Predators
  • DiRT 3
  • H.A.W.X. 2
  • Heaven v2.5 DX11
  • Mafia II
  • Metro 2033
  • Total War: Shogun 2

As always, all games are tested at max settings (unless otherwise noted), with 4xAA and 16xAF enabled.

Article Type: 

Article

Teaser Icon: 

Still demanding DX11 benchmark that we’ve used for a while here on the WSGF. Though it’s closing in on two years old, the AvP stand-alone benchmark tool is still a good test of DX11 hardware. It isn’t very demanding from a CPU perspective, so it gives a good test of the GPU itself.

The AvP demo also makes good usage of DX11 effects such as Advanced Shadows and Geometry Tessellation, particularly on the alien create and the alien «pods». There are also some unique lighting effects used, by placing mobile lighting sources in a floor lamp that is battered around by the alien creatures as they clamor down a tight hallway.

The AVP benchmark proved odd for me this go round. Normally, card placement is static between widescreen and Eyefinity (the #2 card in WS will be the #2 card in EF). For some reason the HD 7770 comes in below the HD 6770 (and the rest of the pack) in widescreen. It does best the HD 6770 in Eyefinity, but somehow the HD 6790 beats everything.

From a purely qualitative standpoint, AVP is quite demanding on the HD 7770 and the HD 7750. The HD 7770 GHz Edition will crack 30fps at 1600×900, but falls short at 1080p. The game is simply unplayable at max settings in Eyefinity.

Article Type: 

Article

Teaser Icon: 

Dirt 3 has replaced our previous benchmark of Dirt 2. The Dirt 2 benchmark was the «urban» London circuit, which had several nice examples of water tessellation for the gar to drive through. The Dirt 3 benchmark we use is the Aspen track, which is a long winding snow course.

Rather than water and cloth effects in Drt 2, the Dirt 3 course showcases snow covered trees that flank a snow-covered course with tessellation effects on the snow tracks gouged into the snow. Additionally, there are continuous snow particles kicked up from the cars, and a better chance to see cars flipping and skidding. Overall, a nice and «pretty» update to our Dirt 2 benchmark.

Dirt 3 is known to perform well on a wide range of cards. Both the HD 7770 and 7750 cross 30fps at 1600×900, and the HD 7770 pushes well past 30fps at 1080p. A few tweaks to the graphics settings, and either card could hit 60fps on a single screen. The game hits around 20fps in Eyefinity. 60fps would be out of reach without significant adjustments, but 30fps would be easily achievable while maintaining a high level of visual quality.

Looking at cards from the previous generation, the HD 7770 performs within a couple of frames of the Radeon HD 6850. It ends up being about 15% faster than the Radeon HD 6770 it «replaces», and about 10% faster than the Radeon HD 6790 that was the «top end» of the Radeon HD 6700 family.

Article Type: 

Article

Teaser Icon: 

Sequel to the original HAWX title. This title updates the original by moving from DX10 to DX11, and utilizing tessellation on the mountainous landscape. The original HAWX demo provided a simple camera fly-through of an area populated by detailed cities and waterways. The «action» consisted mostly of ground explosions and some aircraft engagement.

The HAWX 2 demo removes the cities and water, and focuses on very detailed snow-covered mountain range with a large fleet of aircraft firing missiles. The viewpoint of the camera alternates between a third-person view over the top of a jet, as well as a first-person view inside the same craft.

Like Dirt3, HAWX2 is known to be both an attractive game and coded to run well on a variety of hardware. Both cards in the 7700 family push past 60fps on a single screen. The Radeon HD 7700 GHz Edition pushes past 30fps in Eyefinity, even at 3x1080p.

From a widescreen perspective, the Radeon HD 7700 GHz Edition beats the HD 6790 by 10%, and beats the HD 6770 by a full 43%. The Radeon HD 7750 even beats the HD 6770 by 26%. Looking at Eyefinity performance, the Radeon HD 770 GHz Edition beat the HD 6790 by about 5% and the Radeon HD 6770 by 35%.

Article Type: 

Article

Teaser Icon: 

Update to the Heaven v2 demo, that has been an long-standing benchmark for many people. Though it’s largely the same as the v2 demo, it does add a couple of new set pieces — particularly a new airship. This title is more demanding than the previous iteration, and adds a new tessellation options.

The Heaven demo continues to offer options for testing in DX9, DX10 and DX11 code paths. We have narrowed our testing to DX11, and are no longer testing the DX9 and DX10 code paths. The DX9 and DX10 were more CPU dependent and less of a test of the strength or weakness of the GPU. The DX11 truly stresses a GPU.

The Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition pushes past 30fps at 1600×900, and it almost hits the performance level of the Radeon HD 6850. A drop in AA and it would hit 30fps at 1080p. It averages about a 5% performance increase over both the Radeon HD 6790 and the HD 6770. Like all cards in this range, the Radeon HD 7770 turns in a slideshow performance in Eyefinity for the Heaven demo.

Article Type: 

Article

Teaser Icon: 

Demanding benchmark that is included in the Mafia II open-world crime title. The title begins with an exterior gunfight, highlighting cars losing parts and being destroyed. The demo then moves inside a warehouse which highlights a gun battle, with destructible environments (brick columns) and excellent flame effects.

One thing to note is that the demo performs much better on a second run-through. The first run shows noticeable hiccups during the loading of different scenes. Subsequent runs run much smoother, though the overall average isn’t seriously effected.

Mafia II is a fairly demanding title. The Radeon HD 7750 passes 30fps at 1600×900, and comes close at 1080p. The Radeon HD 7770 GHz passes 30fps at max settings in both instances. Mafia II is quite demanding in Eyefinity, and no card in this class hits 30fps at max settings. With enough tweaks 30fps may be attainable, but you would be better served stepping up to a larger card, preferably one with a larger frame buffer.

Article Type: 

Article

Teaser Icon: 

Demanding benchmark that is included in the popular FPS, Metro 2033. The demo is a camera fly through in a subway tunnel. There are large amounts of gunfire, cloth and lighting effects. The demo has a number of noticeable slowdowns from heavy flame, fog and motion blur effects. We run the game on the DX11 code path.

One a single GPU we see a number of dips, similar to Far Cry 2. When running in CrossFire multi-GPU, I do see noticeable micro-stuttering.

Metro 2033 needs a lot of horsepower, and it needs a large frame buffer. Neither card hits 30fps in a single screen. The Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition does just beat the Radeon HD 6790, and surpasses the Radeon HD 6770 by more than 20%. The game is a slide show in this family of cards, in Eyefinity.

Article Type: 

Article

Teaser Icon: 

Benchmark that is included in Total War: Shogun 2. This is the one instance we are not running at full «max» settings with 4xAA/16xAF. The benchmark simply will not run at these settings in Eyefinity on any 1GB card. To enable a consistent benchmark across all cards I’ve used these settings: «Very High» preset, 2xAA, and all the DX11 options turned on.

The Shogun 2 benchmark has a unique feature in that it will not let you overrun the frame buffer. If it finds your graphics card doesn’t have enough VRAM, then it simply fails to run and makes suggestions on what settings you can reduce. Running the game at these settings at 1080p, the benchmark tool reports back that you’ve over spent the graphics card VRAM by 1MB. So, at «close to» maximum visual fidelity, this is our first benchmark that needs 2GB for 1080p gameplay. We have plenty of games that require 2GB to play Eyefinity at 1080p, but this is the first time we’ve seen a 2GB requirement for single screen.

The title showcases a number of scenes — both broad views of large scale battles (with large numbers of units), and highlighting the detail in marching columns of soldiers.

Both cards in the 7700 family pass 30fps at 1600×900, but settings need to be adjusted to even play/benchmark the game at 1080p.

Video Cards & GPUs AMD Radeon GPU Content Archive Listing — Page 4

Video Cards & GPUs Content

Listing of our AMD Radeon GPU content from our Video Cards & GPUs category. You can also search by year.

Refine Content by Year

AMD Radeon R9 270X 2GB Reference Video Card Review

Following the testing of the new Radeon R7 260X 2GB, we move into the higher-end R9 270X 2GB. This review also introduces Battlefield 4 testing. | Oct 11, 2013 9:23 AM CDT

AMD Radeon R7 260X 2GB Reference Video Card Review

AMD launch a new series of video cards today. The first we look at is the Radeon R7 260X 2GB — let’s dive in and see how it does in our gaming tests. | Oct 7, 2013 11:12 PM CDT

Sapphire Radeon HD 7730 1GB GDDR5 Video Card Review

AMD’s Radeon HD 7730 is a video card model we haven’t heard a lot about. Today we find out if there’s a reason for that. | Aug 20, 2013 5:01 PM CDT

MSI Radeon HD 7790 1GB OC Overclocked Video Card Review

We check out another retail AMD Radeon HD 7790 1GB video card. This time it’s from the folks at MSI and we overclock it. | May 22, 2013 12:01 AM CDT

Sapphire Radeon HD 7790 2GB OC Edition Video Card Review

Sapphire doubles the memory on the Radeon HD 7790 to 2GB and we find out if it makes any difference in our gaming tests. | May 13, 2013 11:14 AM CDT

AMD Radeon HD 7990 6GB and HD 7970 GHz Edition Video Cards in CrossFireX

We throw a Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition in with the new HD 7990 6GB dual-GPU video card and look at CrossFireX gaming performance. | Apr 29, 2013 1:28 AM CDT

AMD Radeon HD 7990 6GB Dual GPU Video Card Overclocked

We’ve tested the new AMD Radeon HD 7990 dual GPU beast with its out of the box performance, and now we see what happens when we overclock it. | Apr 24, 2013 5:16 PM CDT

AMD Radeon HD 7990 6GB Dual GPU Video Card Review

We’ve been hearing about this model for months. Today we finally get to see the Radeon HD 7990 from AMD, and what it can do. | Apr 23, 2013 11:01 PM CDT

ASUS Radeon HD 7790 DirectCU II OC Overclocked Video Card Review

It’s been a long time since we’ve seen a video card from ASUS, but today we check out the new HD 7790 DirectCU II OC, and see how it performs. | Apr 9, 2013 5:31 PM CDT

Sapphire Radeon HD 7750 1GB Low Profile Video Card Review

We have a quick look at a low profile version of the Radeon HD 7750 from Sapphire, which is suited to smaller systems such as those using Mini-ITX motherboards and cases. | Mar 28, 2013 6:31 PM CDT

GIGABYTE Radeon HD 7790 1GB OC Overclocked Video Card Review

With a new GPU model from AMD we’re got some different versions of the new Radeon HD 7790 and today we look at one from GIGABYTE and overclock it. | Mar 25, 2013 11:56 PM CDT

Sapphire Radeon HD 7790 1GB Dual-X OC Video Card Review

AMD has released a new model and we see just what the Radeon HD 7790 is about with the Dual-X OC model from Sapphire. | Mar 22, 2013 2:45 AM CDT

HIS Radeon HD 7770 iCooler 1GB Overclocked Video Card Review

We take a look at what HIS is doing with the mid-range AMD Radeon HD 7770 and take the time to overclock it to see what it can do. | Mar 20, 2013 1:41 AM CDT

HIS Radeon HD 7850 iPower IceQ Turbo 4GB Video Card Review

HIS double the memory on the HD 7850 and release a 4GB version of the popular model. | Mar 12, 2013 12:20 AM CDT

Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 XT (Tahiti LE) 2GB with Boost Overclocked Video Card Review

We take a look at our second Tahiti LE based AMD Radeon HD 7870 video card and overclock it this time as well to see what’s on offer. | Jan 23, 2013 12:01 AM CST

PowerColor Radeon HD 7950 3GB PCS Overclocked Video Card Review

We take a look at the PCS wielding Radeon HD 7950 video card from PowerColor and see what it can do when overclocked. | Jan 22, 2013 2:34 AM CST

HIS Radeon HD 7970 3GB IceQ X2 Overclocked Video Card Review

We overclock the HIS Radeon HD 7970 3GB IceQ X2 video card with its new «iPower» improved power setup and see how it performs under our benchmark tests. | Jan 16, 2013 4:24 AM CST

HIS Radeon HD 7750 1GB IceQ X Turbo Video Card Review

We check out a good looking Radeon HD 7750 video card from HIS. But is looks all that it has going for it? | Jan 9, 2013 1:19 PM CST

HIS Radeon HD 7970 6GB IceQ X2 (Dual GPU) Video Card Review

HIS brings a dual GPU Radeon HD 7970 video card to the market and we find out if it’s something you want. Is there really any question about it, though? | Jan 3, 2013 7:59 AM CST

PowerColor PCS+ Radeon HD 7870 (Tahiti LE) 2GB Myst Video Card Review

We check out the new Tahiti LE based HD 7870 from PowerColor and give you the low down. | Jan 1, 2013 9:39 PM CST

HIS Radeon HD 7950 3GB IceQ X2 Overclocked Video Card Review

We have a look at the new IceQ X2 version of the Radeon HD 7950 3GB from HIS and see how it overclocks today. | Dec 25, 2012 4:54 PM CST

HIS Radeon HD 7850 2GB IceQ Turbo Video Card Review

HIS sent over some new video cards and the first one we look at is the Radeon HD 7850 IceQ 2GB. | Dec 20, 2012 6:19 PM CST

PowerColor DEVIL13 Radeon HD 7990 6GB Video Card Overclocked

Just recently we checked out the self-made dual GPU HD 7990 from PowerColor. Now we overclock the beast to see what it can do. | Oct 24, 2012 9:01 AM CDT

PowerColor DEVIL13 Radeon HD 7990 6GB Video Card Review

We check out the beast that is the DEVIL 13 HD 7990 6GB from PowerColor. Let’s see what it’s capable of. | Oct 23, 2012 10:28 AM CDT

Sapphire Radeon HD 7770 Flex Edition 1GB Video Card Review

The latest addition to the Flex Edition series from Sapphire comes in the form of the Radeon HD 7770. Let’s check it out. | Sep 28, 2012 10:49 PM CDT

Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 3GB Vapor-X OC with Boost Video Card Review

AMD continue to battle new NVIDIA GEFORCE models with new variations of its Radeon video cards. Today we check out the new Radeon HD 7950 Boost from Sapphire. | Aug 22, 2012 3:38 PM CDT

Sapphire Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Vapor-X 3GB Overclocked Video Card Review

Sapphire expands the Vapor-X series by bringing the new GHz Edition based HD 7970 into the scene. | Aug 14, 2012 12:15 PM CDT

Sapphire Radeon HD 7770 Vapor-X OC Edition 1GB Video Card Review

We have a look at the recent AMD Radeon HD 7770 incarnation from Sapphire which comes under the Vapor-X Tag. | Aug 8, 2012 12:04 AM CDT

Sapphire Radeon HD 7850 2GB OC Edition Video Card Review

We check out the pre-overclocked HD 7850 2GB from Sapphire and see how it performs today. | Aug 6, 2012 2:27 PM CDT

HIS Radeon HD 7970 X Turbo 3GB Overclocked Video Card Review

HIS bring a beasty new GHz Edition Radeon HD 7970 to the table with the new HD 7970 X IceQ X2 Turbo. | Jul 30, 2012 12:49 AM CDT

HIS Radeon HD 7850 2GB Video Card Overclocked Review

We overclock the HIS HD 7850 and see how much performance we can get out of the model. | Jul 24, 2012 9:42 PM CDT

HIS Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition 2GB Video Card Overclocked Review

We overclock the HIS Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition and see how much performance we can get out of it. | Jul 18, 2012 11:23 PM CDT

Sapphire Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition TOXIC 6GB Video Card Overclocked

We get our first taste of overclocking the new 7970 GHz Edition in retail form with the new 6GB TOXIC monster from Sapphire. | Jul 14, 2012 9:08 AM CDT

Sapphire Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition TOXIC 6GB Video Card Review

Sapphire finally brings TOXIC back. We check out the new AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition TOXIC that carries a massive 6GB of onboard memory. | Jul 13, 2012 8:24 AM CDT

Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 2GB Flex Edition Video Card Review

Having just looked at the HD 7950 Flex Edition recently, we look at the cheaper HD 7870 version today and see if it’s worth considering. | Jul 11, 2012 9:18 AM CDT

Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 3GB Flex Edition Video Card Review

The latest addition to the Flex Edition series from Sapphire comes in the form of the AMD Radeon HD 7950. Let’s check it out. | Jun 29, 2012 2:30 AM CDT

AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 3GB Video Card Overclocked

We’ve already seen the new GHz Edition Radeon HD 7970 at stock speeds. Now let’s see how it goes when it comes to overclocking. | Jun 25, 2012 1:59 AM CDT

AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition 3GB Video Card Review

AMD try to steal the lime light back from NVIDIA with the new Radeon HD 7970 GHz edition. We see if they can do it! | Jun 21, 2012 11:00 PM CDT

XFX Radeon HD 7850 Black Edition 2GB Video Card Review

Part of the much loved Black Edition series from XFX, we see what has been done with the AMD Radeon HD 7850 GPU. | Jun 15, 2012 10:07 AM CDT

Zalman Radeon HD 7950-Z VF3000 2GB Video Card Review

We look at our very first Zalman based video card and see if the company has a chance in this competitive market. | Jun 12, 2012 10:39 PM CDT

MSI Radeon HD 7850 2GB Power Edition Overclocked Video Card Review

MSI expand the Power Edition series with the release of the Radeon HD 7850. We overclock it a lot and see what the model is capable of doing. | May 24, 2012 10:23 AM CDT

MSI Radeon HD 7870 HAWK 2GB Overclocked Video Card Review

MSI expand the popular HAWK series with the introduction of the popular AMD Radeon HD 7870 to the performance based series of video cards. | May 4, 2012 6:46 AM CDT

VisionTek Radeon HD 7950 3GB Video Card Overclocked Review

With the recent AMD price drops, we check out the VisionTek Radeon HD 7950 and overclock it with the latest Catalyst drivers. | Apr 27, 2012 1:17 AM CDT

PowerColor PCS+ Radeon HD 7970 3GB VORTEX II Overclocked Video Card Review

We check out the brand new PCS+ HD 7970 3GB VORTEX II video card from PowerColor and overclock it to see how it goes. | Apr 25, 2012 8:48 AM CDT

Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 2GB OC Edition Video Card Review

We check out Sapphire’s OC Edition variant of the new HD 7870 and see what it does for us today. Let’s check it out! | Apr 22, 2012 11:53 PM CDT

MSI Radeon HD 7870 2GB TwinFrozr Overclocked Video Card Review

We check out the Twin Frozr based HD 7870 from MSI and see how it overclocks and performs today. | Apr 20, 2012 3:15 AM CDT

MSI Radeon HD 7770 Power Edition 1GB Overclocked Video Card Review

MSI’s first Radeon 7000 series Power Edition video card arrives in the form of the HD 7770, a model that’s been hit and miss. | Apr 19, 2012 3:50 AM CDT

XFX Radeon HD 7870 Black Edition 2GB Video Card Review

We check out the new Black Edition HD 7870 from XFX and see if the new series continues to impress. | Apr 2, 2012 1:07 AM CDT

MSI Radeon HD 7970 Lightning 3GB Video Card Overclocked Review

AMD’s Radeon HD 7970 gets the Lightning treatment from MSI and we take the time to overclock this bad boy to see what it can do. | Mar 29, 2012 10:16 AM CDT

HIS Radeon HD 7870 IceQ Turbo Overclocked Video Card Review

We look at the brand new HD 7870 IceQ Turbo from HIS and see how the latest generation IceQ cooler goes when overclocked. | Mar 26, 2012 11:34 PM CDT

  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Next

Newsletter Subscription

Latest News

  • NVIDIA Omniverse contest winner brings simulated bots to life
  • Boston Dynamics, other companies say robots should not be weaponized
  • Honda takes the wraps off the Prologue, company’s first electric SUV
  • John Wick, Matrix star Keanu Reeves wants to direct BRZRKR for Netflix
  • Restaurants use robots to eliminate repetitive tasks, fill worker gaps

View More News

Latest Reviews

  • MSI MAG Coreliquid 240R V2 White CPU Liquid Cooler Review
  • Cooler Master MasterLiquid PL360 FLUX CPU Liquid Cooler Review
  • AMD Ryzen 9 7950X «Zen 4» CPU Review
  • AMD Ryzen 7 7700X «Zen 4» CPU Review
  • Star Trek: The Motion Picture — Director’s Edition 4K Blu-ray Review

View More Reviews

Latest Articles

  • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Unboxed: FE, ASUS ROG Strix, MSI SUPRIM LIQUID
  • Storage Showdown — Intel Alder Lake vs. AMD Zen 4
  • AMD Ryzen 7000 series «Zen 4» CPUs: Everything You Need To Know
  • Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered Benchmarked: 8K with DLSS 2.4 + FSR 2.0
  • Phison I/O+ Technology Preview — DirectStorage Gaming Companion

View More Articles

Partner Content

  • HP Holiday Buyer’s Guide and Black Friday Deals
  • Supermicro SuperO C9Z590-CGW Motherboard Detailed
  • Supermicro SuperO Intel Z490 10th Gen Motherboard Overclocking Guide
  • ASRock’s 5Gbit Journey and the Z270 SuperCarrier
  • GIGABYTE AMD X570 Aorus Motherboard VRM Guide

Advertise With UsAMD Radeon R7 260X

vs Asus HD 7770: What is the difference?

34 BALLLA

AMD Radeon R7 260x

34 Ballla

ASUS HD 7770

VS

54 facts compared to

AMD Radeon R7

  • GPU frequency 100MHz higher?
    1100MHz vs 1000MHz
  • 0.69 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
    1. 97 TFLOPS vs 1.28 TFLOPS
  • 1.6 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    17.6 GPixel/s vs 16 GPixel/s
  • 500MHz faster memory speed?
    1625MHz vs 1125MHz
  • 2000MHz higher effective clock speed?
    6500MHz vs 4500MHz
  • 2x more VRAM?
    2GB vs 1GB
  • 21.6 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? 9more memory bandwidth?
    104GB/s vs 72GB/s

Why is Asus HD 7770 better than AMD Radeon R7 260X?

  • 35W below TDP?
    80W vs 115W
  • Has DPFP?
  • Supports 3 more displays?
    6 vs 3

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

Gigabyte Radeon RX 550

Asus HD 7770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

AMD Radeon R7 360

Asus HD 7770

vs

Nvidia GEFORCE GTX 550 Ti

AMD Radeon R7 260x

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 TI

ASUS HD 7770

VS

AMD Radeon RX 550

AMD Radeon R7 260X 9000 VS 9000 VS0003

AMD Radeon R5

Asus HD 7770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

AMD Radeon Vega 8

Asus HD 7770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti

AMD Radeon R7 260x

VS

AMD Radeon R9 270x

ASUS HD 7770

AMD Radeon HD 6670

AMD Radeon R7 260X

VS

NVIDIA GEFR0003

Asus HD 7770

vs

Asus GeForce GTX 650

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

MSI Radeon RX 580

Asus HD 7770

vs

AMD Radeon R7 370

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

Zotac GeForce GTX 660

Asus HD 7770

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

AMD Radeon R7 260X

vs

AMD Radeon RX 460

Asus HD 7770

VS

MSI GEFORCE GTX 950 Gaming

Comparison of prices

Users Reviews

performance

1. TECTION FECTION GP

1100MHz

1000MHz

GPU (GPU) has a higher bore.

2.turbo GPU

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon R7 260X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus HD 7770)

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel rate

17.6 GPixel/s

16 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4.flops

1.97 TFLOPS

1.28 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

61.6 GTexels/s

40 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1625MHz

1125MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7.shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

6500MHz

4500MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2.max memory bandwidth

104GB/s

72GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4. memory bus width

128bit

128bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5. GDDR memory versions

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

6. Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖AMD Radeon R7 260X

✖Asus HD 7770

Memory troubleshooting code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

2nd version of OpenGL

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔AMD Radeon R7 260X

✔Asus HD 7770

The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5. GPU temperature at boot

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon R7 260X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus HD 7770)

Lower boot temperature — this means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon R7 260X

✖Asus HD 7770

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔AMD Radeon R7 260X

✔Asus HD 7770

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8.DLSS Supported

✖AMD Radeon R7 260X

✖Asus HD 7770

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon R7 260X)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus HD 7770)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1.has HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon R7 260X

✔Asus HD 7770

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

2.HDMI connectors

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus HD 7770)

More HDMI connections allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

HDMI 3.Version

HDMI 1.4

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus HD 7770)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

Price Match

Cancel

Which graphics cards are better?

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

Decent GPU for an extremely low price used, good to add to an older Core 2 era PC or similar. [ Nov ’18 Riog1me

]

MORE DETAILS

Still Got it after all this time. Play soo many games on high over the years. Gettin’ slow now though. [ Sep ’17 NickM33

]

MORE DETAILS
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [ GPUPro

]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed ​​measures performance for typical consumers.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

General Information

A higher transistor count usually indicates a newer, more powerful processor.

Nvidia Quadro GV100

The heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that the cooling system will have to dissipate. A lower TDP also usually means less power consumption.

A smaller size indicates a newer chip creation process.

AMD Radeon RX 570

PCI Express (PCIe) is a high speed expansion card standard that is used to connect a computer to its peripherals. Newer versions support higher throughput and provide better performance.

AMD Radeon R7 250X Review | AMD Radeon HD 7770 turns into R7 250X

⇡#Performance test results

diagrams.

  • 3DMark (2013)

  • Unigine Valley Bench
  • Total War: SHOGUN 2 — Fall of the Samurai
  • Sniper Elite V2 Benchmark
  • Sleeping Dogs
  • Hitman: Absolution
  • Crysis 3
  • Tomb Raider (2013)

9000

  • BioShock Infinite
    • Metro: Last Light
    • GRID 2
    • Company of Heroes 2
    • Batman: Arkham Origins
    • Battlefield 4
    • Thief

    At the end of the testing, we give the final table with test results.

    Newegg regular price $130 $90 Radeon HD 7770: $110; Radeon R7 250X: $99 $132 $130

    $100 in US online retailer — great price compared to starting price foreign online stores, since the price dropped to $100, and at the moment it is at $110. Of course, it’s a sin not to take advantage of such a discount if the cost is 9The 0022 Radeon R7 250X will drop to $100, but that’s not something enthusiasts would be very interested in.
    To be honest, if we didn’t consider the Radeon HD 7770

    the most important model on the mass market of modern video cards, we would probably just release a small note about the old card with a new name and get back to our business. However, in our opinion, the
    Radeon HD 7770
    (and now
    Radeon R7 250X ) is the most profitable budget model, because at $110 it is the cheapest option to run games with a resolution of 1920×1080 pixels at low or medium detail level.

    ⇡#Gainward GeForce GTX 650 1 GB

    With a length of only 155 mm and a thickness of 38 mm, this compact graphics card will fit in the smallest case, so fans of HTPC systems will surely like it. Most of the front side of the Gainward GeForce GTX 650 is covered by a cooling system with a black plastic frame and a bright red fan impeller.

    The reverse side of the video card does not stand out with anything remarkable. Among the outputs are mini-HDMI, DVI and D-Sub, that is, quite standard equipment for video cards of this class.

    There are no connectors for creating SLI on the video card, but you can find one six-pin connector for connecting additional power, installed in the usual place.

    Remove the cooling system and look at the circuit board.

    A simple power system is built according to the 2 + 1 scheme, where two phases fall on the graphics processor and one more on the video memory.

    Apparently, a microcircuit marked 08 FJ 508 is used here as a controller, information about which we could not find.

    The graphics processor has a protective frame around the perimeter of the substrate, which protects the crystal from chipping. The last one was released in Taiwan on the 20th week of 2013 and belongs to the A1 version. Its area is 221 mm2.

    Gainward GeForce GTX 650 GPU clock in 3D mode is 1058-1059MHz, which is in line with NVIDIA specifications. You could see all the rest of its very modest characteristics in the table above. The ASIC quality of our Gainward GeForce GTX 650 was 74.7%.

    The video card is equipped with one gigabyte of GDDR5 video memory manufactured by Elpida (W2032BBBG-60-F).

    The theoretical effective frequency of such microcircuits is 6000 MHz, but on the Gainward GeForce GTX 650 the memory runs at 5000 MHz, allowing us to hope for good overclocking. However, according to personal experience, we don’t have much hope for Elpida microcircuits, but we’ll see anyway … The theoretical bandwidth of this memory with a bus width of 128 bits is 80 GB / s.

    This is what the Gainward GeForce GTX 650 specs look like as interpreted by the GPU-Z utility.

    The video card is cooled by a small aluminum radiator with a thin 10 mm fan with eleven blades.

    As you can see, there is nothing special to describe here. There are no radiators on the power elements, and they are not needed on such a video card, in our opinion. There is also no fan speed monitoring, but it is still regulated automatically by the video card — by changing the supply voltage depending on the temperature of the GPU.

    To test the temperature regime of video cards, we used five cycles of the test of the very resource-intensive game Aliens vs. Predator (2010) at maximum graphics quality at a resolution of 2560×1440 pixels with 16x anisotropic filtering, but without activating MSAA anti-aliasing.

    MSI Afterburner version 3.0.0 beta 19 and GPU-Z utility version 0.7.7 were used to monitor temperatures and all other parameters. All tests were carried out in a closed case of the system unit, the configuration of which you can see in the next section of the article, at an average room temperature of about 25 degrees Celsius. 9degrees Celsius.

    Despite the simplicity of the video card and its cooling system, we still tried to overclock it, and, as it turned out, not in vain. Without the slightest loss of stability and the appearance of image defects, we managed to raise the frequency of the graphics processor by 235 MHz, and increase the effective frequency of the video memory by 1800 MHz at once!

    The final frequencies of the video card were 1294/6800 MHz or +22/36%. Impressive, isn’t it? Top video cards rarely boast such excellent overclocking potential.

    After overclocking the video card, the temperature of its GPU in automatic fan speed control mode was 60 degrees Celsius, which is also quite low for such frequencies.

    Let’s supplement the Gainward GeForce GTX 650 review with a link to its BIOS and move on to the next participant in today’s test.

    Benefits

    Reasons to choose AMD Radeon R7 360

    • Newer graphics card, release date difference 2 year(s) 9month(s)
    • About 40% less power consumption: 100 Watt vs 140 Watt
    • 175x more memory frequency: 1050 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
    • PassMark — G2D Mark performance by about 3% more: 469 vs 457
    • About 67% more performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 17437 vs 10469
    • About 25% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.068 vs 30.505
    • 0021 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) approximately 16% faster: 819.203 vs 705.293
    • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) approximately 10% faster: 3.386 vs 3.085
    • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) about 65% better performance: 58.285 vs 35.416
    • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 3 times better performance: 188.858 vs 62.69
    • About 34% more performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4798 vs 3581
    • About 9% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 4012 vs 3690
    • GFXBench benchmark 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) about 34% more: 4798 vs 3581
    • GFXBench 4.0 performance — Manhattan (Fps) about 9% more: 4012 vs 3690
    • 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score benchmark approx. 6% more: 1406 vs 1323 9 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 38.068 vs 30.505 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 819.203 vs 705.293 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s) 3.386 vs 3.085 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 58.285 vs 35.416 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 188.858 vs 62.69 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4798 vs 3581 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 4012 vs 3690 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen ( Fps) 4798 vs 3581 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 4012 vs 3690 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 1406 vs 1323

      Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

      • 3% more Boost core clock: 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz
      • 56% more texturing speed: 78.4 billion / sec vs 50.4 GTexel / s
      • Number of shader processors by 25 % more: 960 vs 768
      • 23% more floating point performance: 1.981 gflops vs 1.613 gflops
      • About 29% more performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 3977 vs 3078
      • Rex (Frames) by about 99% more: 6694 vs 3356
      • performance in the GFXBENCH Benchmark 4.0-T-REX (FPS) is about 99% more: 6694 VS 3356
      • MHZ VS 1000 MHZ
        Characteristics
        Textory speed 78. 4 Billion / SEC VS 50.4 GTEXEL / S
        The number of shaders are bay0003

        AMD Radeon R7 360

        versus

        AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

        Benefits

        Reasons to choose AMD Radeon R7 360

        • Newer video card, release date difference 3 year(s) 4 month(s)
        • : 50.4 GTexel / s vs 40 GTexel / s

        • 20% more shader processors: 768 vs 640
        • 26% more floating point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 1,280 gflops
        • Approximately 25% less power consumption: 100 Watt vs 125 Watt
        • Maximum memory size is 2 times larger: 2 GB vs 1 GB
        • Approximately 7% improvement in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 504 vs 472
        • Approx. ) about 7% more: 36.089vs 33.836
        • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) approximately 62% faster: 818.625 vs 506.712
        • CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) approximately 11% faster : 3.352 vs 3.01
        • About 17% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.23 vs 49.787
        • About 23% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) : 188.534 vs 153.657
        • About 29% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) benchmark: 4799 vs 3707
        • About 29% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) benchmark: 4799 vs 3707
        • 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score about 97% higher: 1402 vs 711
        Release date 18 June 2015 vs 15 February 2012
        Texturing speed 50.4 GTexel/s vs 40 GTexel/s
        Number of shaders 768 vs 640
        Floating point performance 1. 613 gflops vs 1.280 gflops
        Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt vs 125 Watt
        Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
        PassMark — G3D Mark 3045 vs 2187
        PassMark — G2D Mark 504 vs 472
        Geekbench — OpenCL 17603 vs 14263
        CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 36.089 vs 33.836
        CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 818.625 vs 506.712
        CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.352 vs 3.01
        CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 58.23 vs 49.787
        CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 188.534 vs 153.657
        GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4799 vs 3707
        GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4799 vs 3707
        3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 1402 vs 711

        Reasons to choose AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

        • 7% more memory frequency: 1125 MHz vs 1050 MHz
        • GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) performance about 9% more: 4527 9027 4527 4.4 times more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 14630 vs 3356
        • About 9% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 4524 vs 4147
        • performance in GFXBench benchmark 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 4.4 times bigger: 14630 vs 3356
        Memory frequency 1125 MHz vs 1050 MHz
        GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 4524 vs 4147
        GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 14630 vs 3356
        GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 4524 vs 4147
        GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 14630 vs 3356

        Benchmark comparison

        GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
        GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition

        PassMark — G3D Mark
        GPU 1
        GPU 2
        PassMark — G2D Mark
        GPU 1
        GPU 2
        Geekbench — OpenCL
        GPU 1
        GPU 2
        CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
        GPU 1
        GPU 2
        36.089
        33.836
        CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
        GPU 1
        GPU 2
        818.625
        506.712
        CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)
        GPU 1
        GPU 2
        CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)
        GPU 1
        GPU 2
        49.787
        CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
        GPU 1
        GPU 2
        188.534
        153.657
        GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
        GPU 1
        GPU 2
        GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)
        GPU 1
        GPU 2
        GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
        GPU 1
        GPU 2
        GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
        GPU 1
        GPU 2
        GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)
        GPU 1
        GPU 2
        GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps)
        GPU 1
        GPU 2
        3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score
        GPU 1
        GPU 2
        Name AMD Radeon R7 360 AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
        PassMark — G3D Mark 3045 2187
        PassMark — G2D Mark 504 472
        Geekbench — OpenCL 17603 14263
        CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 36.089 33.836
        CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 818.625 506.712
        CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.352 3.01
        CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 58.23 49.787
        CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 188.534 153.657
        GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4799 3707
        GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 4147 4524
        GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3356 14630
        GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4799 3707
        GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 4147 4524
        GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3356 14630
        3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 1402 711

        Feature comparison

        AMD Radeon R7 360 AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
        Architecture GCN 2. 0 GCN 1.0
        Codename Tobago Cape Verde
        Design AMD Radeon R7 300 Series AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series
        Issue date 18 June 2015 15 February 2012
        Price at first issue date $109 $159
        Place in the rating 522 476
        Price now $146.65
        Type Desktop Desktop
        Price/performance ratio (0-100) 29. 24
        Boost 9 core clock0619

        1000MHz 1000MHz
        Floating point performance 1.613 gflops 1.280 gflops
        Process 28nm 28nm
        Number of shaders 768 640
        Stream Processors 768 640
        Texturing speed 50.4 GTexel/s 40 GTexel/s
        Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 125 Watt
        Number of transistors 2,080 million 1,500 million
        Video connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
        DisplayPort support
        Dual-link DVI support
        Eyefinity
        HDMI
        Number of Eyefinity Displays 6
        VGA
        CrossFire without bridge
        Tire PCIe 3. 0 PCIe 2.1 x16
        Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
        Length 165mm 210 mm
        Additional power connectors 1 x 6-pin 1x 6-pin
        DirectX 12 11
        Mantle
        OpenCL 2.0
        OpenGL 4.5 4.

        2024 © All rights reserved