Intel Core i7 10700 vs i5 10600K: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 10700
Intel Core i5 10600K
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 2.9 GHz Intel Core i7 10700 with 8-cores against the 4.1 GHz i5 10600K with 6-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i7 10700
67
Core i5 10600K
70
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i7 10700
46
Core i5 10600K
45
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i7 10700
55
Core i5 10600K
51
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i7 10700
55
Core i5 10600K
55
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 10600K and 10700
Advantages of Intel Core i7 10700
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than the Core i5 10600K – 65 vs 125 Watt
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size
- Around 4.
2 GB/s (10%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Advantages of Intel Core i5 10600K
- Unlocked multiplier
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i7 10700
1228
Core i5 10600K
+13%
1385
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 10700
8529
Core i5 10600K
+23%
10465
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i7 10700
2900
Core i5 10600K
+1%
2929
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i7 10700
+16%
16771
Core i5 10600K
14472
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i7 10700
1248
Core i5 10600K
+3%
1290
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 10700
+9%
7800
Core i5 10600K
7180
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 10700 and i5 10600K
General
| Vendor | Intel | Intel |
| Released | May 1, 2020 | May 1, 2020 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Comet Lake | Comet Lake |
| Model number | i7-10700 | i5-10600K |
| Socket | LGA-1200 | LGA-1200 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 630 |
Performance
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base Frequency | 2. 9 GHz |
4.1 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.8 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 29x | 41x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 16MB (shared) | 12MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | Yes |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP | 65 W | 125 W |
| Max. temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| GPU Base Clock | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Shading Units | 192 | 192 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| ROPs | 3 | 3 |
| Execution Units | 24 | 24 |
| TGP | 15 W | 15 W |
Max. Resolution |
4096×2304 — 60 Hz | 4096×2304 — 60 Hz |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 10700
0.38 TFLOPS
Core i5 10600K
0.38 TFLOPS
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| Official site | Intel Core i7 10700 official page | Intel Core i5 10600K official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i7 10700
129 (70.
9%)
Core i5 10600K
53 (29.1%)
Total votes: 182
ompetitors
1.
Core i7 10700 vs M1 Max
2.
Core i7 10700 vs Core i5 12600K
3.
Core i7 10700 vs Core i5 12400F
4.
Core i7 10700 vs Core i3 12100
5.
Core i7 10700 vs Core i7 10700F
6.
Core i5 10600K vs Core i5 12400
Intel Core i5-10600K vs Intel Core i7-10700: What is the difference?
64points
Intel Core i5-10600K
56points
Intel Core i7-10700
i5-10600KF
i7-10700F
vs
64 facts in comparison
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i7-10700
Why is Intel Core i5-10600K better than Intel Core i7-10700?
- 6.03% faster CPU speed?
6 x 4.1GHzvs8 x 2.9GHz - Has an unlocked multiplier?
- 12 higher clock multiplier?
41vs29 - 24.
37% cheaper?
275.74 €vs364.61 €
Why is Intel Core i7-10700 better than Intel Core i5-10600K?
- 267MHz higher ram speed?
2933MHzvs2666MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
16vs12 - 0.5MB bigger L2 cache?
2MBvs1.5MB - 20.32% higher PassMark result?
17485vs14532 - 60W lower TDP?
65Wvs125W - 4MB bigger L3 cache?
16MBvs12MB - 128KB bigger L1 cache?
512KBvs384KB - 4.2GB/s more memory bandwidth?
45.8GB/svs41.6GB/s
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i5-10600K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i5-10600K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Intel Core i5-10600K
vs
Intel Core i5-11600K
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i5-10600K
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
Intel Core i7-11700
Intel Core i5-10600K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
Intel Core i5-12500
Intel Core i5-10600K
vs
Intel Core i7-10700K
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
Intel Core i7-10700K
Intel Core i5-10600K
vs
Intel Core i5-1240P
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
Intel Core i5-11400
Intel Core i5-10600K
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
Intel Core i7-10700T
Intel Core i5-10600K
vs
Intel Core i5-11400
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
Price comparison
Cheap alternatives
User reviews
Performance
1.
CPU speed
6 x 4.1GHz
8 x 2.9GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.8GHz
4.8GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔Intel Core i5-10600K
✖Intel Core i7-10700
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.
L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
2MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2666MHz
2933MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
41.6GB/s
45.8GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.
DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖Intel Core i5-10600K
✖Intel Core i7-10700
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10600K)
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10600K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance.
(Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
234.5seconds
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
763.5seconds
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
(Intel Core i7-10700)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i5-10600K
✔Intel Core i7-10700
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔Intel Core i5-10600K
✔Intel Core i7-10700
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔Intel Core i5-10600K
✔Intel Core i7-10700
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔Intel Core i5-10600K
✔Intel Core i7-10700
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10600K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔Intel Core i5-10600K
✔Intel Core i7-10700
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i5-10600K
✖Intel Core i7-10700
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10600K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel i5-10600K vs. i7-10700K | Digital Trends
The i5-10600K and i7-10700K are Intel’s most recent midrange processors, targeting high-end gaming rigs and professional workers who don’t have the budget or need for something like the i9-10900K. There are some clear differences between the two chips, though both earned a recommendation in our best Intel processor roundup. The question is, which one should you buy?
Contents
- Pricing and availability
- Specs and performance
- i5 or i7?
Although the more expensive i7-10700K is the better option in certain situations, the i5-10600K is a surprisingly capable CPU.
Especially if you’re willing to overclock your processor, it can match the performance of the 10700K when used for gaming. For other uses, such as audio and video editing, however, the i7 still reigns supreme.
Pricing and availability
Intel
The i5-10600K and i7-10700K released alongside the rest of Intel’s Comet Lake processors on April 20, 2020. The “K” models — not the “KF” models, which have nonfunctional onboard graphics — released at an MSRP of $262 for the i5 and $374 for the i7. Those are the same prices Intel offered with its last-gen Coffee Lake Refresh chips, the i5-9600K and i7-9700K.
In late 2020, you can still find both processors at most retailers, and that shouldn’t change anytime soon. Intel is expected to unveil its 11th-gen desktop chips sometime in 2021. Details remain slim, but Intel promises much improved instructions per clock (IPC), but a maximum of eight cores only.
Until then, both processors will likely be readily available. They’re currently priced around their MSRP, with the i5 at $280, and the i7, $380.
On the second-hand market, you can save between $50 and $100. We found multiple listings for 10700Ks for between $280 and $350, though most sit around the $320 mark. We couldn’t find nearly as many secondhand 10600Ks, however. If you’re lucky, you can snag one pre-owned for around $220.
Specs and performance
Comparing the 10600K and 10700K on paper, there aren’t many surprises. Both use the same 14nm process node that Intel has been refreshing for the past six years, and only differ slightly in terms of specs. The i5 comes with six cores and 12 threads, while the i7 bumps the core count to eight with 16 threads. The i7 also comes with 4MB more of Intel’s Smart Cache, and has a higher boost clock out of the box.
| Intel Core i5 10600K | Intel Core i7 10700K | |
| Process node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Cache | 12MB Intel Smart Cache | 16MB Intel Smart Cache |
| Base clock speed | 4. 1GHz |
3.8GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.8GHz | 5.1GHz |
| Graphics | UHD 630 | UHD 630 |
| TDP | 125W | 125W |
“Out of the box” is important because you can push both processors above 5GHz with adequate cooling. At stock, we can see some clear differences in performance with GeekBench results. The 10700K earned a single-core score of 1,334 and a multi-core score of 9,319, while the 10600K earned a single-core score of 1,306 and a multi-core score of 7,026. Although both results are “valid” according to GeekBench, you should always take user-generated benchmarks with some skepticism. It’s not that they’re incorrect, but rather that it’s impossible to account for cooling and other components when comparing one user’s results to another.
Single-core performance is equal, or at the very least, well within the margin of error.
Multi-core performance tells a different story, however, with the more expensive i7 soaring above the i5 by around 2,000 points. There are more cores on the 10700K, and they can boost higher out of the box. For high-end gaming and photo/video editing applications, the 10700K is a clear winner.
Guru3D’s CPU-Z benchmark backs up the GeekBench results with a synthetic workload. The i7 and i5 are evenly matched in single-core performance — 571 and 551, respectively — and distant in multi-core performance (5,747 and 4,055, respectively).
In real-world testing, the 10700K beats the 10600K in heavily threaded applications, too. Ashes of the Singularity, for example, takes advantage of all the cores and threads of the 10700K. At 1080p with the Crazy preset, the 10700K reaches an average framerate of 55.6 FPS while the 10600K reaches 50.2 FPS, according to third-party benchmarks. That’s not the case in all games, however. In Final Fantasy XV, the 10600K actually beat the 10700K 175 FPS to 173.
9 FPS.
In games that rely heavily on the CPU — such as Grand Theft Auto V, Hitman 2, and Civilization VI — the i7 is a clear favorite. However, most games are GPU bound, not CPU bound. As we can see in Final Fantasy XV, the 10600K easily matches the more expensive 10700K, and you’ll likely see similar results in games that stress the GPU more than the CPU. If gaming is what you’re interested in, save yourself the extra $100 and put it toward a good graphics card.
If you are a dab hand at overclocking, the 10600K has been known to nip at the heels of the much more expensive 10900K with the right cooling.
The multi-core performance advantage of the 10700K shows up more when it comes to productivity apps. Video editing applications like Premiere both like a lot of cores, so video editors will get more out of the 10700K. If you do 3D modeling or CAD work, the 10700K is a must (you might even consider upgrading to the 10900K).
i5 or i7?
Historically, Intel has unlocked i5 and i7 processors of any particular generation battle for the limelight, and that’s no different with Comet Lake.
The i3s are usually slow enough to be focused entirely on low-power systems, and the i9-10900K, although very impressive, is expensive. For Comet Lake, the 10600K and 10700K are both excellent processors at competitive prices, but the one you should pick up depends on what you want to do.
If you’re building a PC exclusively for gaming, the 10600K is the better option, even if the 10700K performs better in certain titles. However, you can close that gap if you’re willing to do some manual overclocking. The 10600K can easily hit 5GHz, and although it may not match the performance of the 10700K in all games with an overclock, it will get close.
The 10700K will show a performance improvement in certain applications, namely photo and video editing suites and 3D modeling software. Simply put, the 10700K has more cores and threads, so in applications that can take advantage of those cores, you’ll see higher performance.
Editors’ Recommendations
-
Intel Innovation 2022: 13th-gen chips, slidable displays, and everything else
-
Intel Core i9-13900K vs.
Core i9-12900K: Will it be worth the upgrade?
-
Intel 13th-gen Raptor Lake arrives just in time to hit back at AMD
-
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X vs. Intel Core i9-12900K: Two flagships face off
-
The best Intel processors for 2022
Intel Core i5-10600K vs Intel Core i7-10700: What is the difference?
64 Ballla
Intel Core i5-10600k
56 Ballla
Intel Core i7-10700
I5-10600KF
I7-10700F 9000 i7-10700
Why is Intel Core i5-10600K better than Intel Core i7-10700?
- 6.03% higher CPU speed?
6 x 4.1GHz vs 8 x 2.9GHz - Has it unlocked?
- 12 hour multiplier higher?
41 vs 29 - 24.37% cheaper?
275.74 € vs 364.61 €
- 267MHz higher RAM speed?
2933MHz vs 2666MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
16 vs 12 - 0.
5MB more L2 cache?
2MB vs 1.5MB - 20.32% higher PassMark score?
17485 vs 14532 - 60W below TDP?
65W vs 125W - 4MB more L3 cache?
16MB vs 12MB - 128KB more L1 cache?
512KB vs 384KB - 4.2GB/s more memory bandwidth?
45.8GB/s vs 41.6GB/s
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Core i5-10600k
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
Intel Core i7-10700
AMD Ryzen 5 5600g
VS 9000 RYS 9000 AMD AMD AMD AMD Intel Core i7-10700
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Intel Core i5-10600K
vs
Intel Core i5-11600K
Intel Core i7-10700003
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
Intel Core i5-10600k
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800x
Intel Core i7-10700
VS
AMD RYZEN 5 5600G
Intel Core i7-10700
VS
Intel Core i5-12500
Intel Core i5-10600k
Intel Core I7-10700K
vs
Intel Core i7-10700K
Intel Core i5-10600k
VS
Intel Core i5-1240p
Intel Core i7-10700
INTE vs
AMD RYZEN 7 5700G
Intel Core i7-10700
VS
Intel Core i7-10700t
Intel Core i5-10600k
-11400
ANTL vs
AMD RYZEN 7 5800X
Intel Core i7-10700
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
Completion of prices
cheaper
performance
1.
Oschas
8 x 2.9GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.8GHz
4.8GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has unlocked multiplier
✔Intel Core i5-10600K
✖Intel Core i7-10700
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
2MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2666MHz
2933MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
41.6GB/s
45.8GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.
DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7. Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖Intel Core i5-10600K
✖Intel Core i7-10700
Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-10600K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-10600K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor.
(Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Result Cinebench R20 (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
234.5seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)
Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
763.
5seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i5-10600K
✔Intel Core i7-10700
physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔Intel Core i5-10600K
✔Intel Core i7-10700
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔Intel Core i5-10600K
✔Intel Core i7-10700
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔Intel Core i5-10600K
✔Intel Core i7-10700
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-10600K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔Intel Core i5-10600K
✔Intel Core i7-10700
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i5-10600K
✖Intel Core i7-10700
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-10600K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Core i7 10700 vs i5 10600K:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 10700
Intel Core i5 10600K
Which is better: 8-core Intel Core i7 10700 at 2.9 GHz or i5 10600K with 6 cores at 4.1 GHz? To find out, read our comparison test of these 14nm desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one kernel
Core i7 10700
67
Core i5 10600k
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nucleus
Core I7 10000 9000 46
Core i5 10600K
45
Energy efficiency
Efficiency of energy consumption chip
Core i7 10700
55
Core i5 10600k
51 9000
Key differences
What are the main differences between 10600K and 10700
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 10700
- 48% lower than Core i5 10600K peak power consumption — 65 vs 125 Watts
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Has 4 MB more L3 cache
- 4.
2 GB/s (10%) more maximum memory bandwidth
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 10600K
- Unlocked multiplier
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 10700
1228
Core i5 10600K
+13%
1385
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 10700
8529
Core i5 10600K
+23%
10465
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 10700
2900
Core i5 10600K
+1%
2929
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 10700
+16%
16771
Core i5 10600K
14472
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 10700
1248
Core i5 10600K
+3%
1290
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 10700
+9%
7800
Core i5 10600K
7180
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full specifications of Intel Core i7 10700 and i5 10600K
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Release date | May 1, 2020 | May 1, 2020 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Comet Lake | Comet Lake |
| Model number | i7-10700 | i5-10600K |
| Socket | LGA-1200 | LGA-1200 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 630 |
Capacity
| Number of cores | 8 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 16 | 12 |
| Frequency | 2. 9 GHz |
4.1 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.8 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 29x | 41x |
| Bus speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 256KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 16MB (shared) | 12MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Power consumption
| Process | 14 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| GPU frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Shader blocks | 192 | 192 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| ROPs | 3 | 3 |
| Computer units | 24 | 24 |
| TGP | 15 W | 15 W |
Max. resolution |
4096×2304 — 60Hz | 4096×2304 — 60Hz |
Igpu Flops
Core i7 10700
0.38 Teraflops
Core I5 10600K
0.38 Teraflops
Memory Support
9000
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i7 10700 | Site Intel Core i5 10600K |
| PCI Express version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 10700
129 (70.
9%)
Core i5 10600K
53 (29.1%)
Total votes: 182
Competitors
1.
Core i7 10700 and M1 Max
2.
Core i7 10700 and Core i5 12600K
3.
Core i7 10700 and Core i5 12400F
4.
Core i7 10700 and Core i3 12100
5.
Core i7 10700 and Core i7 10700F
6.
Core i5 10600K and Core i5 12400
What will you choose: Intel Core i5 10600K or i7 10700?
Name
Message
Comparison of Intel Core i5-10600K and Intel Core i7-10700
Comparative analysis of the Intel Core i5-10600K and Intel Core i7-10700 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability , Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-10700
- 2 more cores, ability to run more applications simultaneously: 8 vs 6
- 4 more threads: 16 vs 12
- About 33% more L1 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L2 cache is about 33% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L3 cache is about 33% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- About 92% less power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
- About 16% more performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark: 16806 vs 14509
- About 28% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score benchmark: 10238 vs 8029
| Number of cores | 8 vs 6 |
| Number of threads | 16 vs 12 |
| Level 1 cache | 512 KB vs 384 KB |
| Level 2 cache | 2 MB vs 1536 KB |
| Level 3 cache | 16MB vs 12MB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 16806 vs 14509 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 10238 vs 8029 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-10600K
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-10700
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-10600K | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2935 | 2920 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 14509 | 16806 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 8029 | 10238 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
2034 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2034 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 6970 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 6970 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 11748 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 11748 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Core i5-10600K | Intel Core i7-10700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Comet Lake | Comet Lake |
| Issue date | 30 Apr 2020 | 27 May 2020 |
| Price at the date of the first issue | $262 — $263 | $323 |
| Place in the rating | 238 | 29 |
| Processor Number | i5-10600K | i7-10700 |
| Series | 10th Generation Intel Core i5 Processors | 10th Generation Intel Core i7 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 4. 10 GHz |
2.90 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| Level 1 cache | 384KB | 512KB |
| Level 2 cache | 1536KB | 2MB |
| Level 3 cache | 12MB | 16MB |
| Process | 14nm | 14nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4. 80 GHz |
4.80 GHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 12 | 16 |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 128GB | 128GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2933 |
| Device ID | 0x9BC5 | 0x9BC5 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 20 GHz |
1.20 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video Technology HD | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Video memory size | 64GB | 64GB |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 | 3 |
| 4K support | ||
| Maximum resolution via DisplayPort | [email protected] | [email protected] |
| Maximum resolution via eDP | [email protected] | [email protected] |
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4 |
[email protected] | [email protected] |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Configurable TDP-down | 95 Watt | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 3.80 GHz | |
| Maximum number of processors in | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37. 5mm |
| Supported sockets | FCLGA1200 | LGA 1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015D | PCG 2015C |
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel SSE4.
|