Intel Core i5 8400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600 : Which one is better?
Home
Comparison
Intel Core i5 8400 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
VS
Intel Core i5 8400
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i5 8400 with 6 cores 2.8GHz and AMD Ryzen 5 3600 with 6 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Key Differences
Intel Core i5 8400’s Advantages
Integrated graphics card
AMD Ryzen 5 3600’s Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (DDR4-3200 vs DDR4-2666)
Larger memory bandwidth (51.2GB/s vs 41.6GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (4. 0 vs 3.0)
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 2.8GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (32MB vs 9MB)
Benchmark
Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i5 8400
1021
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
+27%
1297
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i5 8400
5804
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
+63%
9477
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Core i5 8400
2387
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
+7%
2565
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Core i5 8400
9214
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
+91%
17685
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Core i5 8400
1032
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
+20%
1240
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i5 8400
4611
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
+53%
7078
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i5 8400
1298
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
+26%
1640
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i5 8400
4677
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
+51%
7084
Intel Core i5 8400
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
General Parameters
Oct 2017
Release Date
Jul 2019
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Coffee Lake
Core Architecture
Matisse
i5-8400
Processor Number
-
LGA-1151
Socket
AM4
UHD Graphics 630
Integrated Graphics
No
Package
-
Transistor Count
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
LGA-1151
Socket
AM4
65 W
Power Consumption
65 W
100
Peak Operating Temperature
95
CPU Performance
6
Performance Cores
6
6
Performance Core Threads
12
2.
8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
6
Total Core Count
6
6
Total Thread Count
12
100MHz
Bus Frequency
100MHz
28x
Multiplier
36x
64K per core
L1 Cache
64K per core
256K per core
L2 Cache
512K per core
9MB shared
L3 Cache
32MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
128GB
Max Memory Size
128GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
41.
6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Graphics Card Parameters
True
Integrated Graphics
-
350 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
1050 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
192
Shader Units
-
24
Texture Units
-
3
Raster Operation Units
-
24
Execution Units
-
15 W
Power Consumption
-
4096×2304 — 60 Hz
Max Resolution
-
0.
38 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
Miscellaneous
Intel Core i5 8400
Official Website
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
3.0
PCIe Version
4.0
16
PCIe Lanes
16
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2
Extended Instruction Set
-
Related CPU Comparisons
1
Intel Core i7 8700 vs
Intel Core i5 8400
2
Intel Core i5 8400 vs
Intel Core i5 12400
3
Intel Core i5 8400T vs
Intel Core i5 8400
4
Intel Core i5 8400 vs
Intel Core i5 13500
5
Intel Core i5 8400 vs
Intel Core i5 13400F
6
Intel Core i5 8400 vs
Intel Core i7 7700
7
Intel Core i5 8400 vs
Intel Core i5 9500
8
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
9
Intel Core i5 8400 vs
Intel Core i5 10400
10
Intel Core i5 8400 vs
Intel Core i3 9100F
© 2023 — TopCPU.
net
Contact Us
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X vs Intel Core i5-8400
Summary
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
159%
-
Intel Core i5-8400
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
132%
-
Intel Core i5-8400
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
186%
-
Intel Core i5-8400
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
| Much higher single threaded performance (around 32% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
| Much higher multi threaded performance (around 86% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
| Around 59% higher average synthetic performance. |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-8400 |
Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | Intel Core i5-8400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
| SSE4A | ||||
| SSE4.1 | ||||
| SSE4.2 | ||||
| AES | ||||
| AVX | ||||
| AVX2 | ||||
| BMI1 | ||||
| BMI2 | ||||
| SHA | ||||
| F16C | ||||
| FMA3 | ||||
| AMD64 | ||||
| EVP | ||||
| AMD-V | ||||
| SMAP | ||||
| SMEP | ||||
| SMT | ||||
| Precision Boost 2 | ||||
| XFR 2 | ||||
| EIST | ||||
| Intel 64 | ||||
| XD bit | ||||
| VT-x | ||||
| VT-d | ||||
| AES-NI | ||||
| TSX | ||||
| TXT | ||||
| CLMUL | ||||
Boost 2. 0 |
||||
Architecture
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | Intel Core i5-8400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | AMD Zen 2 | vs | Intel_Coffelake | |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR4 | |
| Codename | Zen 2 | vs | Coffee Lake | |
| Release Date | Mar 2019 | vs | Jan 2018 |
Cores
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | Intel Core i5-8400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | vs | 6 | |
| Threads | 12 | vs | 6 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | No | vs | Intel UHD 630 |
Cache
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | Intel Core i5-8400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 16MB (shared) | vs | 9216 KB (shared) |
Physical
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | Intel Core i5-8400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | Intel Socket 1151 | |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | 72°C | |
| Package | vs | FC-LGA1151 | ||
| Die Size | unknown | vs | 151mm² | |
| Process | 7 nm | vs | 14 nm |
Performance
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | Intel Core i5-8400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 4000 MHz | vs | 2800 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | 4800 MHz | vs | 4000 MHz | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
| Voltage | variable | vs | unknown | |
| TDP | 95 W | vs | 65 W |
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
5376 points
-
Intel Core i5-8400
4800 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
32793 points
-
Intel Core i5-8400
20160 points
Points — higher is better
points — higher is better
points — higher is better
Page not found
Page not found
We did not find such a page on our site: /ru/cpu/core-i5-8400-protiv-ryzen-5-3600%23built-in-video
Popular video card comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8GB
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular video cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular
processor comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular processors
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 or Intel Core i5-8400
- 65 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i5-8400
family
- Ryzen 5 3600X
Compare - Ryzen 7 3700X
Compare - Ryzen 7 3800X
Compare - Ryzen 9 3900X
Compare
Family
- Core i3-8100
Compare - Core i3-8300
Compare
Game Speed
Ryzen 5 3600
67 (+11%)
Core i5-8400 9 0005
60.3
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests .
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Ryzen 5 3600
70.2 (+13%)
Core i5-8400
62.4
programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Ryzen 5 3600
48.4 (+28%)
Core i5-8400
37.7
loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Price
The data comes from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
|
Ryzen 5 3600 62.5 (+7%) Core i5-8400 58. |
3
Demanding games and tasks |
|
Ryzen 5 3600 53.2 (+35%) Core i5-8400 39.5 |
Extreme |
|
Ryzen 5 3600 18.4 (+88%) Core i5-8400 9.8 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings.
Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R20 Single Core
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
472 (+15%)
Intel Core i5-8400
411
Cinebench R20 Multi Core
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
3570 (+56%)
Intel Core i5-8400
2291
Cinebench R15 Single Core
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
197 (+21%)
Intel Core i5-84 00
163
Cinebench R15 Multi Core
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
1578 (+71%)
Intel Core i5-8400
925
Geekbench 5 Single Core
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
1183 (+12%) 9000 5
Intel Core i5-8400
1053
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
6821 (+48%)
Intel Core i5-8400
4608
Blender 2.81 bmw27
9000 2 AMD Ryzen 5 3600
235.7
Intel Core i5-8400
400.
9 (+70%)
Passmark
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
17796 (+92%)
Intel Core i5-8400
9262
CPU-Z 17 Single Core 3600
488 (+8%)
Intel Core i5-8400
450
Features
Basic
| Socket Installed in motherboards with a suitable socket. Note that a socket is not guaranteed to be compatible. The manufacturer may not add support to the BIOS. | AM4 | LGA 1151 |
| Manufacturer Firm | AMD | Intel |
| Presentation datePresentation in mass media, official information. | 2019-07-07 | 2017-10-05 |
| Code name of the Microarchitecture family. | Matisse | Coffee Lake |
GenerationCode name for the microarchitecture generation. |
Ryzen 5 (Zen 2 (Matisse)) |
Core i5 (Coffee Lake) |
Performance
| Cores The total number of physical cores. | 6 | 6 |
| ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 12 | 6 |
| Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS you can try to disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). |
Missing |
| Base frequencyThe guaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in the case of the corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 3.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Turbo Frequency The maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under low-threaded loads, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU, but do not load all threads. |
4.2 GHz | 4 GHz |
| BCLK System bus frequency. Some motherboards allow you to achieve a good performance boost by slightly raising the bus frequency. Often this has a bad effect on the stability of the system. | 100 | 100 |
| CPU multiplier. The final CPU frequency is determined by the simple formula BCLK * CPU multiplier. Modern processors instantly change the multiplier of each of the cores, taking into account the type of load, temperature, consumption and settings in the BIOS. | 36 | 28 |
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. |
65 W | 65 W |
| tCaseMax Permissible IHS (heat spreading plate, «cover») temperature. | 95 °C | 72 °C |
Cache and RAM
| L1 Cache First level cache. Modern processors use a multi-level cache. The first is the fastest, but the smallest. In the case of an L1 access and a miss, the L2 cache is searched for the next stage. | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache Second level cache. Holds more data, but is slower. | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
L3 Cache L3 cache. AMD created the Ryzen 7 5800X3D with a record-breaking L3 volume, which reduced the requirements for memory frequency and significantly increased the number of frames in many games. |
32MB (shared) | 9MB (shared) |
| Supported type of RAM The type of RAM determines its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channel |
DDR4-2666 MHz Dual-channel |
Video core
| Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | N/A | N/A |
PCI
PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. |
Gen 4 | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |
Detailed information
| ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Matisse | Coffee Lake |
| Chip manufacturer A company that manufactures chips in its own factory. | TSMC | Intel |
| Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. For Ryzen with a chiplet layout, the CCD process is implied. | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket type | µOPGA-1331 | FC-LGA1151 |
| Spec Code | 100-000000031 | SLAPL |
Which is better
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- On average, gaming performance is 11% better.
