I5 8600k bench: Intel Core i5-8600K Benchmarks — Geekbench Browser

Introduction

October eight of 2018, Intel presented the ninth generation of processors. The i5-9600k processor came to our review. Let’s get acquainted with its characteristics and compare it with its predecessor. What is this processor capable of? What temperatures in the load will it have in stock and overclocking? Will there be a performance difference between the previous generation i5-8600k processor and the new i5-9600k?

Test stand

— Corsair TX650M power supply, 650 WATT

— ASUS Prime Z370 -A

Maternal Poem — Ninth generation processor Intel i5-9600k

— The processor cooling system Thermalright Machi

— 16 gigabytes of RAM G.Skill Ripjaws V, two sticks, 3600 megahertz.

— Samsung 970 EVO 500GB NVME SSD

— ASUS GTX1080Ti STRIX 9 series graphics card0003

Testing

First, let’s get acquainted with the characteristics of the new processor using the CPU-Z utility and compare it with its direct competitor of the previous generation.

CPU-Z

The new processor received higher frequencies than its predecessor. The base frequency has increased by 100 megahertz (from 3600 to 3700 megahertz). With the active Turbo boost mode, the frequency increased by 300 MHz with a load on one core (from 4300 to 4600 MHz), and by 200 MHz the frequency with a load on all cores (from 4100 to 4300 MHz). The revision of the processor has changed. According to the first data, it is clear that the user will receive a more productive processor out of the box.

Let’s check the difference in performance between processors. In the nominal mode of operation, we will conduct a processor performance test built into the CPU-Z program.

The new i5-9600k processor showed 7.6% better performance in single core calculations (CPU Single Thread), and 6% better performance in calculations on all six cores (CPU Multi Thread). The difference in performance is clearly visible due to the higher processor frequencies.

In the Cinebench R15 test package, the i5-9600k takes the lead with 1066 points, outperforming its predecessor by 5. 6% due to higher frequencies.

PassMark PerformanceTest

The PassMark PerformanceTest test package allows you to conduct a comprehensive performance test of your computer and its individual components.

Part of the features of this package was used, namely, the processor testing section. It includes nine tests that reflect the processing power of the processor under different loads. As a result of the i5-9 test600k scored 14373 points. The i5-8600k processor tested under the same conditions showed a value of 13765 points, losing 4.4% to the new product in the complex result.

Summing up the intermediate result, it became clear that in the nominal mode the i5-9600k processor is faster than the i5-8600k processor, from 4 to 6%, due to the increased frequencies.

World of Tanks enCore

In our test, the World of Tanks enCore processor, in conjunction with the GTX 1080Ti graphics card, was able to provide excellent performance, providing an average of 227 frames per second, with rare drawdowns up to 100 frames per second.

Looking ahead, it should be noted that overclocking the i5-9600k processor to 5000 MHz on all cores significantly improved performance in this test.

After overclocking the i5-9600k processor to 5000 MHz, the average frames per second (FPS) increased by 4.8% (from 226 to 237). The minimum FPS indicators were confidently kept at the level of 120 frames, which gave a 20% increase. Overclocking the processor had a positive effect on the overall stability of the displayed frames per second.

For comparison, let’s look at the results in World of Tanks enCore, obtained on the 8600k processor overclocked to 5000 MHz to create the most equal comparison conditions.

You can clearly see the similar performance of the i5-9600k and i5-8600k running at the same frequency of 5000 megahertz. Both processors perform well, delivering solid 120fps or more with stable gaming.

CPU consumption

CPU consumption was monitored by software using AIDA64 and HWiINFO64 programs, which read readings from sensors located in computer components. In order to evaluate the accuracy of software monitoring readings, the consumption of the i5-9600k processor was measured using the ELECALL EM2015C current clamp on the CPU 12v processor power line. The processor functioned in the nominal mode of operation with the active Turbo Boost function. The actual consumption of the processor will differ from the consumption calculated by the current strength (fixed by clamps) and the voltage at the processor power connector to a lower side. The processor power line wattage value includes the energy that is released as heat on the motherboard’s power subsystem. The efficiency of modern VRM reaches values ​​​​of 90%. Taking into account the measurement error of current clamps, the readings of program monitoring can be 10-15% less.

The difference between the readings obtained from the results of measurements and the readings of software monitoring did not go beyond the expected error, therefore, the software power monitoring method displays values ​​close to real values.

In the nominal mode, in the AIDA64 FPU test stability test, the i5-9600k processor demonstrates moderate temperatures with a maximum temperature of the hottest core of 62 degrees.

What temperatures will be recorded when it is overclocked?

Overclocking

The i5-9600k processor has an unlocked multiplier and is positioned by Intel as a solution that can be overclocked by increasing the multiplier in the motherboard settings. The ASUS PRIME Z370-A board based on the Z370 system logic has flexible settings for overclocking the processor and RAM.

The CPU under test was overclocked by i5-9600k to 5000 MHz. The processor core voltage was set to 1.29volts, with an offset correction parameter of +0.02. The Load Line Calibration parameter was set to level 5. To prevent the board from increasing the voltage further, the values ​​of the IA AC Load Line and IA DC Load Line parameters were set to 0.01. The final value of the voltage on the cores did not rise above 1. 28 volts. This mode of operation was absolutely stable for real applications, but the LinX test had to reduce the frequency to 4600 MHz.

At a frequency of 5000 MHz for all six cores, in the AIDA64 FPU Test stability test, the temperature of the hottest core of the i5-9 processor600k has risen 15 degrees (from 62 to 77) degrees compared to the temperatures in the nominal mode of operation.

The i5-9600k showed decent results. The temperatures remained within acceptable limits. Before critical temperatures, there was a margin of 23 degrees.

During testing, an attempt was made to analyze the properties of the thermal interface under the cover of the i5-9600k processor in comparison with the properties of the thermal interface under the cover of the predecessor i5-8600k. The i5-8600k processor was overclocked to 5000 MHz with the overclocking settings that were applied to the i5-9600k to get as close as possible to the power consumption of the processors. During the comparison, the cooling fan rotated at a constant speed of 1200 rpm.

Overclocked to 5000 megahertz, the i5-8600k processor showed temperatures far from critical with a margin of 22 degrees. According to the AIDA64 stress test monitoring, the power consumption of both processors was in the region of 120 watts. The i5-9600k had a monitoring reading of 122 watts, while the i5-8600k had a monitoring reading of 116 watts.

The AIDA64 FPU test showed close temperature readings. The differences were 2-3 degrees.

To successfully pass the LinX version 0.80 test, we had to reduce the frequency of both processors. When executing AVX instructions, the frequency dropped to 4600 megahertz. This was achieved by setting the AVX multiplier to minus 4.

Both the i5-9600k processor and the i5-8600k processor exceeded the temperature value of 9 during the hottest core temperature test.0 degrees, showing a similar result. The readings of the power consumed by the processors, according to software monitoring, crossed the mark of 160 watts.

Under the conditions of the tests, the temperatures of the cores of the i5-9600k and i5-8600k processors turned out to be extremely close. Therefore, we can conclude that the thermally conductive material under the cover of both processors is similar in properties.

Now let’s compare the performance of i5-8600k and i5-9600k processors at 5000 MHz.

The table shows that the i5-8600k i5-9 processors600k at equal core frequencies have similar performance.

The performance gain of the i5-9600k processor in the tests carried out after overclocking

Overclocking the processor to 5000 MHz made it possible to increase the frequency declared by the manufacturer with a load on all cores by 16%. Let’s see how much the performance has increased in the test packages.

The performance of the i5-9600k processor has increased almost in proportion to the increase in the frequency of its cores, due to the ability of modern programs to process data in several threads.

Conclusion

An attempt to compare the properties of the thermal interface under the cover of the i5-9600k and i5-8600k processor showed the following. With close power consumption and the same operating modes of the cooling system fan, the temperatures of the cores of the i5-9600k processor and the i5-8600k processor differed by 3-5 degrees. This suggests that the properties of the thermal interface under the processor covers are similar. According to the results of the testing, it turns out that the solder under the cover of the i5-9 processor600k probably not.

Buying the i5-9600k processor, the user receives increased frequencies in the nominal operating mode compared to its predecessor. This gives an increase in performance of the i5-9600k compared to the i5-8600k by 4-6%. Processor i5-9600k conquered the frequency of 5000 megahertz, while maintaining the stability of the tests. Temperatures in the AIDA64 FPU test at a processor frequency of 5000 MHz reached 77 degrees on the hottest core. This suggests that in everyday use of the processor, temperatures will be significantly lower than in a specialized test designed to create a heavy load on the processor. Overclocking made it possible to improve the processor frequency by 16%, which gave a proportional increase in its computing performance in programs that can work in six or more threads. The i5-8600k processor was also able to conquer the frequency of 5000 megahertz. At the same operating frequencies, i5-9 processorsThe 600k and i5-8600k delivered almost identical performance results in our tests. With the most similar values ​​of power consumption in the load, the temperatures of the processor cores differed by 3-5 degrees. Based on this, the purchase of i5-9600k can be recommended in case of the same price as its predecessor. And also to those buyers who want to get a novelty of the ninth generation.

Testing the Intel Core i5-9400F processor in twenty games — Test

Version 1.0.68.26495. DirectX 11.

Field of view on vehicles — 95. Motion blur — 50%. Depth of field effects — enabled. Chromatic aberration — enabled. Image grain is on. Vignetting is on. Optical distortion — enabled. Resolution is 100%. Frame rate limit — 200. Rendering of subsequent frames — enabled. GPU Memory Limit — Enabled. Texture quality is ultra high. Texture filtering is ultra high. Lighting quality is ultra high. The quality of the effects is ultra high. The post-processing quality is ultra high. Mesh quality is ultra high. The quality of the relief is ultra high. The quality of the grass is ultra high. Smoothing — TAA high. Global Shading — HBAO.

1920×1080 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti)

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

Acceleration

Please enable JavaScript to see graphs
Minimum and average FPS

Contents

This review will examine the performance of the new Intel processor representing the Coffee Lake Refresh family — Core i5-9400F.

Advertising

The following models became his rivals:

Core i5-9600K; Core i5-8600K; Core i5-8600; Core i5-8400; Core i3-8350K; Core i5-7600K;
Ryzen 7 2700X; Ryzen 7 2700; Ryzen 5 2600X; Ryzen 7 1800X; Ryzen 7 1700X.

Recall that you can learn about the work of test benches, methods and processing of results from a detailed story about testing components in games.

Advertising

05, MSI Afterburner 4.

Overclockers. en

09/06/2018 14:24:37

2018-09-06 14:24:37

Sources:

Https://overclockers. ru/lab/show/96399/testirovanie-processor-intel-core-i5-9400f-v-dvadcati-igrah

Core i5-9400 processor in 3 benchmarks » /> » /> .keyword { color: red; }

Intel core i5 9400 game test

Intel started Intel Core i5-9400 sales on October 19, 2018 with a suggested price of $182. This is a Coffee Lake architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 6 cores and 6 threads and is manufactured in 14 nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 4100 MHz, the multiplier is locked.

In terms of compatibility, this is a processor for the FCLGA1151 socket with a TDP of 65W and a maximum temperature of 72°C. It supports DDR4-2666 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

From the leader, which is the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.

General information

Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Core i5-9400, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.

To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

Features

Core i5-9400 quantitative parameters: number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock status. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.

Compatibility

Parameters that determine the compatibility of Core i5-9400 with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.

Technology and additional instructions

This lists the technologies supported by the Core i5-9400 and additional instruction sets. This information is needed if the processor is required to support specific technologies.

Extended instructions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI	+
AVX	+
VPro	—
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2. 0
Hyper-Threading Technology	—
TSX	—
Idle States	+
Thermal Monitoring	+
SIPP	—

Safety technology

Technologies built into the Core i5-9400 that enhance system security, such as hack protection.

Virtualization technologies

Lists technologies supported by the Core i5-9400 that speed up virtual machines.

RAM support

Types, maximum size and number of channels of RAM supported by the Core i5-9400. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.

Embedded Video Specifications

General parameters of the graphics card integrated in the Core i5-9400.

Video core	Intel UHD Graphics 630
Video memory size	64 GB
Quick Sync Video	+
Clear Video	+
Clear Video HD	+
Maximum GPU clock	1. 05 GHz
InTru 3D	+

Integrated video —

interfaces

Interfaces and connections supported by the integrated graphics card in the Core i5-9400.

Integrated video — image quality

The resolution available for the integrated video card in the Core i5-9400, including through various interfaces.

Embedded video — API

support

APIs supported by the Core i5-9400 integrated graphics card, including their versions.

DirectX	12
OpenGL	4. 5

Peripherals

Core i5-9400 supported peripherals and how to connect them.

Benchmark tests

These are the results of Core i5-9400 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The total score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.

Overall performance in tests

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Passmark GeekBench 5 Single-Core GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

Benchmark coverage: 66%

Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark consisting of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

The resolution available for the integrated video card in the Core i5-9400, including through various interfaces.

APIs supported by the Core i5-9400 integrated graphics card, including their versions.

PCI Express Revision 3.

Technical. city ​​

06/18/2018 8:47:42

2018-06-18 08:47:42

Sources:

Https://technical. city/ru/cpu/Core-i5-9400

Specifications Intel Core i5-9400 Coffee Lake Refresh, price, test, competitors » /> » /> .keyword { color: red; }

Intel core i5 9400 game test

Core i5-9 processor400, the price of a new one on amazon and ebay is 220 USD. It is marked by the manufacturer as: BX80684I59400.

Number of cores — 6, produced according to the 14 nm process technology, Coffee Lake Refresh architecture.

Core i5-9400 base frequency — 2.9 GHz. The maximum frequency in Intel Turbo Boost mode reaches 4.1 GHz. Please note that the Intel Core i5-9400 cooler must cool processors with a TDP of at least 65W at stock frequencies. When overclocked, the requirements increase.

With the built-in Intel UHD Graphics 630, the computer can work without a discrete graphics card, since the monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard.

Price in Russia

Want to buy a Core i5-9400 cheaply? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.

Family

Tests Intel Core i5-9400

Speed ​​in games

Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.

The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games fully use no more than 4 cores.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed ​​in office use

Performance in everyday work, such as browsers and office programs.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed ​​in heavy applications

Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.

The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, certain periods of work may be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

Speed ​​of numerical operations

Simple household tasks

Demanding games and challenges

Extreme Load

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

Price in Russia

Want to buy a Core i5-9400 cheaply? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.

Speed ​​in games

Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.

The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games fully use no more than 4 cores.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed ​​in office use

Performance in everyday work, such as browsers and office programs.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed ​​in heavy applications

Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.

The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, certain periods of work may be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

Speed ​​in heavy applications.

Benchmarkdb. en

11/21/2018 1:45:03 AM

2018-11-21 01:45:03

Sources:

Https://benchmarkdb. ru/cpu/intel/core_i5-9400/

Intel Core i5 9 Express Test0001

Since the second generation of Intel Core i, desktop processors have received a fixed number of cores and threads. So the flagship i7 included 4 cores / 8 threads, i5 — 4 cores / 4 threads and i3 — 2 cores / 4 threads. With the announcement of the 8th generation Intel Core processors, the number of cores has increased by two for each representative of the line and now i7 is based on 6 cores / 12 threads, i5 — 6 cores / 6 threads, i3 — 4 cores / 4 threads, which should lead to a significant increase in performance for the same money. An early engineering sample of the Intel Core i5 — 8600K came to our test, and the time for testing it was very limited, so we decided to write this review in the format of an express test. We will conduct a more detailed and detailed acquaintance with Coffee Lake in the near future with serial samples.

Features and comparison with Intel Core i7 — 7700K

Let’s start with a visual comparison. At first glance, if you do not pay attention to the marking, the processors cannot be distinguished. Intel Core i5 — 8600K received identical dimensions, the same size and shape of the cover, a similar arrangement of keys and contact pads. And the only thing that gives out a beginner is a greater number of electrical elements in the center of the pad. Despite this, the new processors have not received compatibility with old motherboards based on 100/200 series chipsets, and old processors are not compatible with new motherboards based on chipsets 300 — series. The reason for this is a different pinout, the pin distribution diagram is shown below.

Testing in benchmarks

Despite the fact that benchmarks do not always demonstrate the real performance of the system, and this is most often due to ideal conditions for performing certain tasks, we decided to traditionally devote little time to them. However, some benchmarks show performance in real workloads and these results are included in testing production applications. One of the most revealing benchmarks that makes optimal use of all the cores of the CineBench R15 processor, the benchmark renders a 3D scene and evaluates both multi-threaded and single-threaded performance.Built-in benchmark in CPU — Z after updating the program to version 1.79has become more accurate, and also demonstrates both multi-threaded and single-threaded performance.

Having already carried out two extremely simple benchmarks, you can see that the new i5 — 8600K processor outperforms the i7-7700K quite a bit and this is a very good sign. How are things in real work tasks?

Testing in real work tasks

There are not so many benchmarks that show performance in real conditions, and we will start with them. I want to note that the time format in seconds is used for rendering. Corona Benchmark 1.3 demonstrates the performance during rendering of a 3D scene, a distinctive feature of the benchmark is that it is built on Corona Render. The performance during video encoding is demonstrated by the X265 Benchmark, from the name it becomes clear that the H.265 codec is used. Next, we check the performance exclusively with working applications. Final rendering of an 11-minute video in Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2017 without additional plug-ins in H.264 and H.265. In Adobe After Effects CC 2017, we rendered a short Underwater scene in original resolution, but with the number of frames increased to 60 fps. For testing WinRAR was used for file archiving speed, but we do not trust the built-in benchmark and tested the performance when archiving a folder with 3.5 gigabytes of files ranging in size from 2 KB to 580 MB. Testing in work tasks also demonstrates the advantage of Intel Core i5 — 8600K over i7-7700K.

Testing in games

At the time of testing, the most powerful video card was AMD Radeon RX470 4GB. For this reason, in order to increase dependence on the processor, we were forced to reduce the resolution to 720p and set the graphics to medium instability with anti-aliasing disabled. The frame rate was fixed by the FRAP program for two minutes in the most similar scenes in the company. AMD software version at the time of testing is 17.7.2. More detailed in-game testing will follow with production samples of Coffee Lake soon.

Temperature conditions

Under the heat-dissipating cover of the processor, there is still a plastic thermal interface, which means that the processor functions without any problems in the specified operating mode. As for overclocking, our sample Intel Core i5 — 8600K was easily overclocked to 5.2 GHz, but AVX instructions could only execute at a frequency of 4.8 with a minimum non-constant throttling value of 1-2%. It is worth noting that the top-end air cooler Noctua NH — D15 acted as cooling, and you can achieve better results with a good LSS.

Impressions of Intel Core i5 — 8600K

Of course, new processors require more detailed testing, but we can already say that the eighth generation of Intel Core is what we have been waiting for.