Nvidia quadro m1200 vs gtx 1050 ti: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro M1200 Graphics cards Comparison

13 октября, 2022

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro M1200 Graphics cards Comparison

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Quadro M1200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today’s games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards’ performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don’t overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1050 Ti will be the best choice, for others Quadro M1200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Check Price

Quadro M1200

Check Price

Quadro M1200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M1200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1200 here:

Quadro M1200 Laptops

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Quadro M1200
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 45 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
 

Check Price

Check Price
  • GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro M1200.
  • GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Quadro M1200 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
  • GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1200 — in Mobile workstations.
  • GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro M1200 — with Maxwell.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 300 MHz higher, than Quadro M1200.
  • GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro M1200 — by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 2008 MHz higher, than Quadro M1200.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 35−40 18−20
ultra / 1080p 21−24 10−12
QHD / 1440p 16−18 5−6
4K / 2160p 10−11 4−5
low / 720p 60−65 35−40
medium / 1080p 40−45 21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro M1200.
high / 1080p 55−60 27−30
ultra / 1080p 45−50 24−27
QHD / 1440p 35−40 9−10
4K / 2160p 18−20 6−7
low / 720p 100−110 60−65
medium / 1080p 60−65 30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro M1200.
low / 768p 50−55 50−55
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Quadro M1200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p 250−260 220−230
medium / 768p 220−230 190−200
ultra / 1080p 180−190 110−120
QHD / 1440p 110−120 75−80
4K / 2160p 70−75 40−45
high / 768p 210−220 160−170
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than Quadro M1200.
low / 768p 60−65 60−65
ultra / 1080p − 45−50
medium / 1080p 55−60 55−60
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Quadro M1200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p 120−130 110−120
medium / 768p 110−120 100−110
ultra / 1080p 100−110 75−80
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Quadro M1200.
high / 1080p 45−50 21−24
ultra / 1080p 40−45 20−22
QHD / 1440p 27−30 18−20
4K / 2160p 14−16 7−8
low / 720p 80−85 45−50
medium / 1080p 45−50 24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Quadro M1200.
high / 1080p 60−65 30−33
ultra / 1080p 45−50 21−24
QHD / 1440p 27−30 14−16
4K / 2160p 27−30 −
low / 720p 180−190 110−120
medium / 1080p 110−120 65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Fortnite is 74% more, than Quadro M1200.
high / 1080p 60−65 30−35
ultra / 1080p 45−50 24−27
QHD / 1440p 30−35 12−14
4K / 2160p 24−27 12−14
low / 720p 100−110 60−65
medium / 1080p 65−70 35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 86% more, than Quadro M1200.
low / 768p 140−150 95−100
medium / 768p 120−130 85−90
high / 1080p 70−75 35−40
ultra / 1080p 30−35 14−16
QHD / 1440p 21−24 5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Quadro M1200.
high / 1080p 24−27 10−12
ultra / 1080p 20−22 9−10
QHD / 1440p 16−18 −
4K / 2160p 8−9 2−3
low / 720p 65−70 35−40
medium / 1080p 30−35 16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Quadro M1200.
low / 768p 130−140 110−120
medium / 1080p 120−130 110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro M1200.
ultra / 1080p 14−16 14−16
low / 720p 100−110 65−70
medium / 1080p 18−20 18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro M1200.
high / 1080p 24−27 14−16
ultra / 1080p 16−18 9−10
QHD / 1440p 10−11 0−1
4K / 2160p 7−8 −
low / 720p 65−70 35−40
medium / 1080p 35−40 18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Quadro M1200.
low / 768p 130−140 65−70
medium / 768p 85−90 40−45
high / 1080p 45−50 21−24
ultra / 1080p 24−27 12−14
4K / 2160p 16−18 7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Quadro M1200.
low / 768p 90−95 90−95
medium / 768p 60−65 60−65
ultra / 1080p 50−55 40−45
high / 768p 60−65 55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro M1200.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Quadro M1200
Architecture Pascal Maxwell
Code name N17P-G1 N17P-Q1
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Release date 25 October 2016 13 January 2017
Pipelines 768 640
Core clock speed 1291 MHz 991 MHz
Boost Clock 1392 MHz 1150 MHz
Transistor count 3,300 million 1870 Million
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 66. 82
Floating-point performance 2,138 gflops
Length 145 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 112 GB/s 80 GB/s
Shared memory — —
G-SYNC support +
VR Ready +
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12
Shader Model 6.4 5.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.2
Vulkan 1. 2.131
CUDA +
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.3 kh/s
CUDA cores 768
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 326 Mh/s
Laptop size large
Optimus +
Decred / DCR (Decred) 1.01 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 12.62 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 156.48 Sol/s
Display Port 1.2
Mosaic +
nView Display Management +
3D Stereo +
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro T1000
  • GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
  • Quadro M1200 vs Quadro T1000
  • Quadro M1200 vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon HD 7970M
  • GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GRID M6 8Q
  • Quadro M1200 vs Radeon HD 7970M
  • Quadro M1200 vs GRID M6 8Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile


Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Buy on Amazon


vs

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

  • Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1093 MHz
  • Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 77. 76 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
  • Around 78% better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
  • Around 78% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 5919 vs 3320
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 323 vs 314
  • 2x better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 21864 vs 10874
  • Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 52.821
  • Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 793.297
  • Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 3.631
  • Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 163.204
  • Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 4941
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 2645
  • Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 4941
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 2645


















Core clock speed 1493 MHz vs 1093 MHz
Texture fill rate 77.76 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 640
Floating-point performance 2,488 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
PassMark — G3D Mark 5919 vs 3320
PassMark — G2D Mark 323 vs 314
Geekbench — OpenCL 21864 vs 10874
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.758 vs 52.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 843.503 vs 793.297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071 vs 3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168 vs 163.204
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496 vs 4941
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3687 vs 2645
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496 vs 4941
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3687 vs 2645

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.966 vs 24.676
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3336
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3336





Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 48.966 vs 24.676
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3336
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks


GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile















PassMark — G3D Mark

GPU 1
GPU 2


PassMark — G2D Mark

GPU 1
GPU 2


Geekbench — OpenCL

GPU 1
GPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

75.758

52.821

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

843.503

793.297

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

24.676

48.966

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

301.168

163.204

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2

















Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
PassMark — G3D Mark 5919 3320
PassMark — G2D Mark 323 314
Geekbench — OpenCL 21864 10874
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.758 52.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 843.503 793.297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071 3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.676 48.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168 163.204
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496 4941
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3687 2645
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3336 3359
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496 4941
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3687 2645
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3336 3359
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 2340

Compare specifications (specs)























NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
Architecture Pascal Maxwell
Code name GP106B GM107
Launch date 1 February 2017 11 January 2017
Place in performance rating 433 638
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Boost clock speed 1620 MHz
Core clock speed 1493 MHz 1093 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,488 gflops 1,399 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 640
Texture fill rate 77. 76 GTexel / s 43.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 4,400 million 1,870 million
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
G-SYNC support
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size large
DirectX 12. 0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 112.1 GB / s 80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

GPU Comparison Specs & Benchmark

VS

General info

The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA Quadro M1200  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

343

Place in performance rating

215

no data

Value for money (0-100)

42.81

Maxwell

Architecture

Pascal

N17P-Q1

Code name

GP107

Mobile workstation

Type

Desktop

13 January 2017 (4 years ago)

Release date

25 October 2016 (5 years ago)

no data

Launch price (MSRP)

$139

$1372

Price now

$350 (2.5x MSRP)

2.89

Value for money

20.60

N17P-Q1

GPU code name

N17P-G1

Mobile workstation

Market segment

Desktop

Technical specs

Which GPU is better between NVIDIA Quadro M1200  vs  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.

640

Pipelines

768

991 MHz

Core clock speed

1290 MHz

1150 MHz

Boost Clock

1392 MHz

1870 Million

Transistor count

3,300 million

28 nm

Manufacturing process technology

16 nm

45 Watt

Power consumption (TDP)

75 Watt

43.72

Texture fill rate

66.82

no data

Floating-point performance

2,138 gflops

no data

Maximum GPU temperature

97 °C

no data

CUDA cores

768

640

Pipelines / CUDA cores

768

1150 MHz

Boost clock speed

1392 MHz

1870 Million

Number of transistors

3,300 million

45 Watt

Thermal design power (TDP)

75 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA Quadro M1200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.

MXM-A (3.0)

Interface

PCIe 3. 0 x16

no data

Length

145 mm

None

Supplementary power connectors

None

large

Laptop size

no data

Memory

Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro M1200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

GDDR5

Memory type

GDDR5

4 GB

Maximum RAM amount

4 GB

128 Bit

Memory bus width

128 Bit

5000 MHz

Memory clock speed

7 GB/s

80 GB/s

Memory bandwidth

112 GB/s

—

Shared memory

—

Video outputs and ports

Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What’s the difference between NVIDIA Quadro M1200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

No outputs

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

no data

G-SYNC support

+

1. 2

Display Port

no data

no data

HDMI

+

Technologies

Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.

no data

VR Ready

+

no data

Multi Monitor

+

no data

3D Vision

+

5.0

CUDA

+

no data

Multi-Projection

+

+

Optimus

no data

+

3D Vision Pro

no data

+

3D Stereo

no data

+

Mosaic

no data

+

nView Display Management

no data

+

nView

no data

no data

Ansel

+

API support

The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA Quadro M1200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests. 

12

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4. 5

OpenGL

4.6

1.1.126

Vulkan

1.2.131

5.0

Shader Model

6.4

1.2

OpenCL

1.2

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti performance benchmarks comparison

Popular comparisons containing this graphics cards

1. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 550
2. AMD Radeon RX 590 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
4. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 570
5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 560
7. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
8. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
9. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
10. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
11. NVIDIA T600 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
12. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
13. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 580
14. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. Radeon RX 6500 XT
15. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti comparison which is better?

General information

Price-quality ratio

The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.

n/a 59.7%

Architecture

Maxwell Pascal

Codename

N17P-Q1 GP107

Type

Mobile workstation Desktop

Release price

n/a 139 $

Number of shaders

640 768

128 (20%) better than

Core clock

991MHz 1291 MHz

300 MHz (30. 3%) better than

Boost frequency

1150 MHz 1392 MHz

At 242 MHz (21%) better than

Number of transistors

1870 million 3.300 million

Process

28 nm 14 nm

-14 nm (-50%) better than

Interface

n/a PCIe 3.0 x16

Power Demand (TDP)

Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation,
the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.

45W

-30 W (-40%) better than

75 W

Length

n/a 145 mm

Additional power connectors

n/a no

G-SYNC Ready

NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts.

Multi Monitor

n/a +

3D Vision

n/a +

VR Ready

Technology from NVIDIA that gives manufacturers access to Multi res Shading, Context Priority, and GPU Direct virtual reality technologies.

n/a +

Vulkan

NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs).
It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.

n/a +

CUDA

The CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for
parallel computing. For example, for the development and design of neural networks.

Multi-Projection

NVIDIA’s Multi-Projection technology improves graphics card performance when building virtual worlds. Images for the left and right eyes are calculated simultaneously.

n/a +

Maximum temperature

n/a 97 °C

Ansel

Decred / DCR (Decred)

n/a 1.01 Gh/s

Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)

n/a 1 Sol/s

Number of CUDA cores

A large number of CUDA cores improve performance in graphics computing,
especially affect anti-aliasing and lighting in games, the speed of training neural networks.

n/a 768

Video connectors

n/a 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

DirectX

12 12 (12_1)

Floating point performance

n/a 2. 138 gflops

Display Port

1.2 n/a

Optimus

+ n/a

3D Vision Pro

+ n/a

3D Stereo

+ no data

Mosaic

+ n/a

nView Display Management

+ n/a

nView

+ n/a

Shader model

5.0 n/a

Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)

n/a 12.62 Mh/s
Memory

Memory type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Maximum memory

Large amount of video memory allows you to run demanding games with a lot of textures,
use high resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.

4 GB 4 GB

Memory bus width

The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games.

128bit 128 bit

Shared memory

— —

Memory frequency

A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.

5000 MHz 7008 MHz

On 2008 MHz (40.2%) better than

Memory bandwidth

The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use.

80 112

32 (40%) better than

Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (mobile) which is better?

Home / Video card / NVIDIA Quadro M1200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (mobile)

45 W

-30 W (-40%) better than

vs

75 W

Memory frequency

5000 MHz

At 4993 MHz (71328. 6%) better than

vs

7 MHz

Benefits NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Comparison winner

Number of shaders

768

128 (20%) better than

vs

640

Core frequency

1493 MHz

502 MHz (50.7%) better than

vs

991 MHz

Boost frequency

1620 MHz

At 470 MHz (40.9%) better than

vs

1150 MHz

Process

14 nm

-14 nm (-50%) better than

vs

28 nm

Memory bandwidth

112

32 (40%) better than

vs

80

General information

Price-quality ratio

The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.

n/a 99.8%

Architecture

Maxwell Pascal

Codename

N17P-Q1 GP107

Type

Mobile workstation For laptops

Number of shaders

640 768

128 (20%) better than

Core clock

991MHz 1493 MHz

At 502 MHz (50.7%) better than

Boost frequency

1150 MHz 1620 MHz

At 470 MHz (40.9%) better than

Number of transistors

1870 million 3. 300 million

Process

28 nm 14 nm

-14 nm (-50%) better than

Interface

n/a PCIe 3.0 x16

Power Demand (TDP)

Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation,
the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.

45W

-30 W (-40%) better than

75 W

G-SYNC Ready

NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts.

Multi Monitor

n/a +

3D Vision

n/a +

Vulkan

NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs).
It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.

n/a +

CUDA

The CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for
parallel computing. For example, for the development and design of neural networks.

Multi-Projection

NVIDIA’s Multi-Projection technology improves graphics card performance when building virtual worlds. Images for the left and right eyes are calculated simultaneously.

n/a +

Maximum temperature

n/a 97 °C

Ansel

Number of CUDA cores

A large number of CUDA cores improve performance in graphics computing,
especially affect anti-aliasing and lighting in games, the speed of training neural networks.

n/a 768

Video connectors

n/a No outputs

DirectX

12 12 (12_1)

DisplayPort

1.2 n/a

Optimus

+ n/a

3D Vision Pro

+ n/a

3D Stereo

+ n/a

Mosaic

+ no data

nView Display Management

+ n/a

nView

+ n/a

shader model

5. 0 n/a
Benchmarks
Memory

Memory type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Maximum memory

Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures,
use high resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.

4 GB 4 GB

Memory bus width

The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games.

128bit 128 bit

Shared memory

— —

Memory frequency

A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.

5000 MHz

At 4993 MHz (71328.6%) better than

7 MHz

Memory bandwidth

The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use.

80 112

32 (40%) better than

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

  • 78% faster floating point performance: 2.488 gflops vs 1.399 gflops
  • Newer graphics card manufacturing process allows for more powerful graphics card but lower power consumption: 16 nm vs 28 nm
  • 40% faster memory clock: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
  • Performance in PassMark — G3D Mark about 78% faster: 5919 vs 3320
  • Performance in PassMark — G2D Mark about 3% faster: 323 vs 314
  • About 43% better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 21864 vs 10874
  • About 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75. 758 vs 52.821
  • Benchmark performance 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 6% more: 843.503 vs 793.297
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 40% more: 5.071 vs 3.631
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 85% more: 301.168 vs 163.204
  • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) about 72% more: 8496 vs 4941
  • About 39% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark: 3687 vs 2645
  • About 72% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) benchmark: 8496 vs 4941
  • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) about 39% higher: 3687 vs 2645
    • Core Clock 1493 MHz vs 1093 MHz
    Texturing speed 77.76 GTexel/s vs 43.72 GTexel/s
    Number of shaders 768 vs 640
    Floating point performance 2. 488 gflops vs 1.399 gflops
    Process 16 nm vs 28 nm
    Memory frequency 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
    PassMark — G3D Mark 5919 vs 3320
    PassMark — G2D Mark 323 vs 314
    Geekbench — OpenCL 21864 vs 10874
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.758 vs 52.821
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 843.503 vs 793.297
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071 vs 3.631
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168 vs 163.204
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496 vs 4941
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3687 vs 2645
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496 vs 4941
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3687 vs 2645

    Reasons to choose NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

    • About 67% less power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
    • About 98% more performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark: 48.646 vs. 646
    • GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) about 1% faster performance: 3359vs 3336
    • About 1% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3336
    Power Consumption (TDP) 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 48.966 vs 24.676
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3336
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3336

    Benchmark comparison

    GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
    GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

    PassMark — G3D Mark
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    PassMark — G2D Mark
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    Geekbench — OpenCL
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    75.758
    52.821
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    843.503
    793.297
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    24.676
    48.966
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    301.168
    163.204
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
    PassMark — G3D Mark 5919 3320
    PassMark — G2D Mark 323 314
    Geekbench — OpenCL 21864 10874
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75. 758 52.821
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 843.503 793.297
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071 3.631
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.676 48.966
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168 163.204
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496 4941
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3687 2645
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3336 3359
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496 4941
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3687 2645
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3336 3359
    3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 2340

    Feature comparison

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
    Architecture Pascal Maxwell
    Codename GP106B GM107
    Production date February 1, 2017 11 January 2017
    Place in the ranking 433 638
    Type Laptop Mobile workstation
    Boost core clock 1620 MHz
    Core frequency 1493 MHz 1093 MHz
    Floating point performance 2. 488 gflops 1.399 gflops
    Process 16 nm 28nm
    Number of shaders 768 640
    Texturing speed 77.76 GTexel/s 43.72 GTexel/s
    Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 45 Watt
    Number of transistors 4,400 million 1,870 million
    Video connectors No outputs No outputs
    G-SYNC support
    Interface PCIe 3.

    2024 © All rights reserved