Intel Core i5-4570 vs Intel Core i7-3770: What is the difference?
39points
Intel Core i5-4570
42points
Intel Core i7-3770
vs
64 facts in comparison
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-3770
Why is Intel Core i5-4570 better than Intel Core i7-3770?
- 200million more transistors?
1400 millionvs1200 million - 4 more GPU execution units?
20vs16 - 0.1 newer version of OpenCL?
1.2vs1.1 - Has FMA3?
Why is Intel Core i7-3770 better than Intel Core i5-4570?
- 6.25% faster CPU speed?
4 x 3.4GHzvs4 x 3.2GHz - 4 more CPU threads?
8vs4 - 32.28°C higher maximum operating temperature?
105°Cvs72.72°C - 300MHz faster GPU clock speed?
650MHzvs350MHz - 32.2% higher PassMark result?
9460vs7156 - 0.
3GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.9GHzvs3.6GHz - 7W lower TDP?
77Wvs84W - 2MB bigger L3 cache?
8MBvs6MB
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
vs
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
vs
Intel Core i7-11800H
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
vs
Intel Core i5-10300H
Intel Core i3-1115G4
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Core i5-4570
0 User reviews
Intel Core i5-4570
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Intel Core i7-3770
3 User reviews
Intel Core i7-3770
9.
0/10
3 User reviews
Features
Value for money
No reviews yet
8.7/10
3 votes
Gaming
No reviews yet
9.0/10
3 votes
Performance
No reviews yet
10.0/10
3 votes
Reliability
No reviews yet
10.0/10
3 votes
Energy efficiency
No reviews yet
9.0/10
3 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
4 x 3.2GHz
4 x 3.4GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.
turbo clock speed
3.6GHz
3.9GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Core i5-4570
✖Intel Core i7-3770
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.
L3 core
1.5MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1600MHz
1600MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
25.6GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖Intel Core i5-4570
✖Intel Core i7-3770
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.
PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.
Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✖Intel Core i5-4570
✔Intel Core i7-3770
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔Intel Core i5-4570
✔Intel Core i7-3770
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔Intel Core i5-4570
✔Intel Core i7-3770
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.
SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔Intel Core i5-4570
✔Intel Core i7-3770
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔Intel Core i5-4570
✔Intel Core i7-3770
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i5-4570
✖Intel Core i7-3770
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-3770)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i7-3770 vs Intel Core i5-4570
Summary
-
Intel Core i7-3770
112%
-
Intel Core i5-4570
100%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i7-3770
100%
-
Intel Core i5-4570
100%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i7-3770
124%
-
Intel Core i5-4570
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-3770 |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 24% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
| Around 12% higher average synthetic performance. |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-4570 |
| None |
Gaming
HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-3770
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-3770
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| Intel Core i7-3770 | Intel Core i5-4570 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
| SSE4.2 | ||||
| AVX | ||||
| EIST | ||||
| Intel 64 | ||||
| XD bit | ||||
| TXT | ||||
| VT-x | ||||
| VT-d | ||||
| Hyper-Threading | ||||
| AES-NI | ||||
| AVX2 | ||||
| TSX | ||||
| CLMUL | ||||
| FMA3 | ||||
Architecture
| Intel Core i7-3770 | Intel Core i5-4570 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Intel_IvyBridge | vs | Intel_Haswell | |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 | |
| Codename | Ivy Bridge | vs | Haswell | |
| Release Date | Apr 2012 | vs | Jun 2013 |
Cores
| Intel Core i7-3770 | Intel Core i5-4570 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | vs | 4 | |
| Threads | 8 | vs | 4 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 | vs | Intel HD 4600 |
Cache
| Intel Core i7-3770 | Intel Core i5-4570 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 8192 KB (shared) | vs | 6144 KB (shared) |
Physical
| Intel Core i7-3770 | Intel Core i5-4570 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | Intel Socket 1155 | vs | Intel Socket 1150 | |
| Max Case Temp | 67°C | vs | 72°C | |
| Package | FC-LGA12C | vs | FC-LGA12C | |
| Die Size | 160mm² | vs | 177mm² | |
| Process | 22 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Performance
| Intel Core i7-3770 | Intel Core i5-4570 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3400 MHz | vs | 3200 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | 3900 MHz | vs | 3600 MHz | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
| Voltage | unknown | vs | unknown | |
| TDP | 77 W | vs | 84 W |
-
Intel Core i7-3770
4017 points
-
Intel Core i5-4570
4032 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-3770
16809 points
-
Intel Core i5-4570
14336 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-3770
12469
-
Intel Core i5-4570
9934
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-3770
3453
-
Intel Core i5-4570
3364
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-3770
13338
-
Intel Core i5-4570
10696
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-3770
3188
-
Intel Core i5-4570
3145
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-3770 (simulated)
139
-
Intel Core i5-4570 (simulated)
146
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i7-3770 (simulated)
647.
94 -
Intel Core i5-4570 (simulated)
519.31
points — higher is better
i7-3770 vs i5-4570 — Call of Duty Modern Warfare with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i5-4570 @ 3.20GHz
i7-3770
i5-4570
Multi-Thread Performance
9293 Pts
7121 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2068 Pts
2055 Pts
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
i7-3770 vs i5-4570 in Call of Duty Modern Warfare using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i7-3770
i5-4570
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
90.0 FPS |
| 1080p |
87. |
| 1440p |
64.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
63.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
38.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
37.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
55.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
53.9 FPS |
7 FPSHigh Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
144.2 FPS |
| 1080p |
141.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
109.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
106.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
70.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
68.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
95.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
93.3 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
198. |
| 1080p |
194.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
153.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
150.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
101.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
99.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
135.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
132.6 FPS |
4 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
306.7 FPS |
| 1080p |
301.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
242.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
237.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
164.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
161.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
215.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
211.3 FPS |
i7-3770
i5-4570
Compare i7-3770 vs i5-4570 specifications
Share Your Comments 91
Compare i7-3770 vs i5-4570 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i5-4570 vs Intel Core i7-3770: What is the difference?
39 BALLLA
Intel Core i5-4570
42 Ballla
Intel Core i7-3770
64 Facts compared to
Intel I5-4570
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 Is 4570 better than Intel Core i7-3770?
- 200million more transistors?
1400 million vs 1200 million - 4 more GPU execution units?
20 vs 16 - 0.
1 newer version of OpenCL?
1.2 vs 1.1 - Has FMA3?
Why is Intel Core i7-3770 better than Intel Core i5-4570?
- 6.25% faster CPU speed?
4 x 3.4GHz vs 4 x 3.2GHz - 4 more CPU threads?
8 vs 4 - 32.28°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
105°C vs 72.72°C - GPU clock 300MHz higher?
650MHz vs 350MHz - 32.2% higher PassMark score?
9460 vs 7156 - 0.3GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.9GHz vs 3.6GHz - 7W below TDP?
77W vs 84W - 2MB more L3 cache?
8MB vs 6MB
What are the most popular comparisons?
AMD RYZEN 5 5500U
VS
Intel Core i5-1135g7
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
VS
Intel Core I3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
VS 9000 NETEL NETL AMD RYZEN 5 3500U
VS
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
VS
Intel Core i5-10210u
AMD Ryzen 7 5800h
VS
9
Intel Core i7-11800h
AMD RYZEN 5 3500U
VS
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 5 4600h
VS
9000 Intel Core i5-1135g7
AMD Ryzen 5 5500u
VS
Intel Core i3-1115g4
Costs
Reviews Users
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i5-4570
0.
0 /10
0 Reviews of Users
Intel Core i7-3770
3 Users
Intel Core i7-3770
/10 9000 9 9000 9
Functions
The price ratio
reviews is not
8.7 /10
3 Votes
reviews yet there are no
9.0 /10
3 Votes
performance
reviews not yet
10.0
3 Votes
Reliability
9000
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 3 votes
Energy efficiency
No reviews yet
9.0 /10
3 votes
CPU performance
speed 1.
4 x 3.2GHz
4 x 3.4GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
3.6GHz
3.9GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✖Intel Core i5-4570
✖Intel Core i7-3770
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
1.5MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1600MHz
1600MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
25.6GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7. Supports Memory Error Code
✖Intel Core i5-4570
✖Intel Core i7-3770
Memory Error Code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
(Intel Core i7-3770)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4570)
This means that the processor is more efficient, resulting in more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✖Intel Core i5-4570
✔Intel Core i7-3770
physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔Intel Core i5-4570
✔Intel Core i7-3770
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔Intel Core i5-4570
✔Intel Core i7-3770
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔Intel Core i5-4570
✔Intel Core i7-3770
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔Intel Core i5-4570
✔Intel Core i7-3770
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i5-4570
✖Intel Core i7-3770
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-3770)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Core i5-4570 vs. Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i5-4570 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 3.60 GHz base 3.40 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 84 W . LGA 1150 CPU socket This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 for RAM support, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Haswell S Architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q3/2013
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i7-3770 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 3.90 GHz base 3.90 GHz all cores while the TDP is set to 77 W .
The processor connects to an LGA 1155 CPU socket This the version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 for RAM support, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Ivy Bridge S Architecture is advanced over 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q2/2012
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 4000
10GHz Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark.
A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Estimated energy use
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Estimated energy use
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
| Intel Core i5-4570 | Intel Core i7-3770 | |
| 84W | Max TDP | 77W |
| N.A. | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Operating cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Operating cost per year | NA |
Comparison of Intel Core i5-4460 and Intel Core i7-3770
Comparative analysis of the Intel Core i5-4460 and Intel Core i7-3770 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphic interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability , Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps).
Intel Core i5-4460
versus
Intel Core i7-3770
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-4460
- Newer processor, release date difference 2 year(s) 2 month(s) 9002brand — GBench1 performance in T-Rex (Frames) about 15% more: 3312 vs 2876
- Performance in GFXBench 4.
0 benchmark — T-Rex (Fps) about 15% more: 3312 vs 2876
| Issue date | 1 June 2014 vs April 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3312 vs 2876 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3312 vs 2876 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-3770
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- About 15% more clock speed: 3.90 GHz vs 3.40 GHz
- About 44% more max core temperature: 105°C vs 72.72°C 33% more means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- About 9% less power consumption: 77 Watt vs 84 Watt
- PassMark — Single thread mark performance about 9% more: 2073 vs 1903
- Approximately 32% improvement in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark: 6398 vs 4845
- Approximately 22% improvement in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 3074 vs 2529
- 34% more: 3662 vs 2725
- Performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) about 33% more: 4.603 vs 3.471 - Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 11% more: 80.961 vs 72.642
- About 45% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.585 vs 0.404
- About 12% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) : 2.179 vs 1.943
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 8% higher: 6.05 vs 5.623
| Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.90 GHz vs 3.40 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 72.72°C |
| Level 3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) vs 6 MB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 77 Watt vs 84 Watt |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2073 vs 1903 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 6398 vs 4845 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 798 vs 795 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 3074 vs 2529 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3662 vs 2725 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
4.603 vs 3.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 80.961 vs 72.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.585 vs 0.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.179 vs 1.943 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.05 vs 5.623 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-4460
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-3770
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-4460 | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1903 | 2073 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 4845 | 6398 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 795 | 798 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2529 | 3074 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 2725 | 3662 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
3.471 | 4.603 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 72.642 | 80.961 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.404 | 0.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.943 | 2.179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.623 | 6.05 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1128 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
2353 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3312 | 2876 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1128 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2353 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3312 | 2876 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Core i5-4460 | Intel Core i7-3770 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Haswell | Ivy Bridge |
| Issue date | June 1, 2014 | April 2012 |
| Price at first issue date | $182 | $324 |
| Place in the rating | 1295 | 1373 |
| Price now | $184. 79 |
$159.99 |
| Processor Number | i5-4460 | i7-3770 |
| Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 10.69 | 17.10 |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3. 20 GHz |
3.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Crystal area | 177 mm | 160mm |
| Level 1 cache | 256KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 1MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 6MB | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 72. 72°C |
105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.40 GHz | 3.90 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 8 |
| Number of transistors | 1400 Million | 1400 million |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25. 6 GB/s |
25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32GB | 32GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR3 1333/1600 |
| Device ID | 0x412 | 0x162 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Maximum GPU clock | 1.1 GHz | 1. 15 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Video memory size | 2GB | |
| Integrated graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 |
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| WiDi support | ||
| Maximum resolution via DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
| Maximum resolution via eDP | [email protected] | |
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4 |
[email protected] | |
| Maximum resolution via VGA | [email protected] | |
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors per configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Supported sockets | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1155 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 77 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013D | 2011D |
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 16 | |
| Revision PCI Express | Up to 3. 0 |
3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
| Anti-Theft Technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4.
|