AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-3770K Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-3770K
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 on one side and the Intel Core i7-3770K on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,9GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-3770K | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen+ | Ivy Bridge | ||||||
| Core name | Pinnacle Ridge | Ivy Bridge | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 5 2000 | Core i7-3000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
YD2600BBM6IAF |
BX80637I73770K, |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2018 | Q2 2012 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm | 22 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 4. 800.000.000 |
1.400.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 6 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 12 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,4 GHz | 3,5 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,9 GHz | 3,9 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores |
— |
4 Cores 8 Threads @ 3,5 / 3,9 GHz |
||||||
| Cache memory | 16 MB | 8 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-2933 |
DDR3 1333/1600 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 43,71 GB/s | 25,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 77 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 16 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 128 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 650 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 1150 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 268,8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | AM4, PGA-1331 | LGA1155 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1155 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 95°C | 105°C | ||||||
| Drystone MIPS | — | 106. 913 DMIPS |
||||||
| Crypto engine |
— |
AES New Instructions, |
||||||
| Security |
— |
Execute Disable Bit, |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 438 | 352 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 3.542 | 1.842 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 161 | 137 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.384 | 672 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.022 | 717 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 8. 126 |
3.281 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.243 | 2.070 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 13.215 | 6.427 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.441 | 4.228 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
20.954 | 14.385 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
267,1 GFLOPS | 153,48 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
322 pts / W | 187 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has more cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
438 3.542 |
| Intel Core i7-3770K |
352 1.842 |
In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 92%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
161 1.  384 |
| Intel Core i7-3770K |
137 672 |
In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 106%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
1.022 8.  126 |
| Intel Core i7-3770K |
717 3.281 |
In single core, the difference is 43%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 148%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
2.  24313.215 |
| Intel Core i7-3770K |
2.070 6.427 |
In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 106%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
4.441 20.  954 |
| Intel Core i7-3770K |
4.228 14.385 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 46%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
4.570 20.707 |
| Intel Core i7-3770K |
4.569 15.678 |
In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 32%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
4.213 19.017 |
| Intel Core i7-3770K |
4.  04013.835 |
In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 37%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-3770K AMD equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel Core i7-3770Intel Core i7-3770SIntel Core i7-3770T
Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i7-3770K
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters.
We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2181 days newer than Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 7% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i7-3770K — 245 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K — 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K — 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn’t have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
245
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
230
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.
97
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3770K Prozessor der dritten Generation (3,5GHz, L3-Cache, Sockel LGA 1155, 77W TDP)
Buy for €101.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
245
FPS
230
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
984
FPS
928
FPS
League of Legends
427
FPS
402
FPS
VALORANT
266
FPS
249
FPS
Apex Legends
265
FPS
248
FPS
Fortnite
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
963
100%
Multi-Core
5235
100%
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
852
87%
Multi-Core
3338
43%
|
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
vs |
Intel Core i7-3770K |
|---|---|---|
|
Apr 19th, 2018 |
Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
|
6 |
Cores | 4 |
|
12 |
Threads | 8 |
3.
|