NVIDIA Nvidia Tesla 6GB GDDR5 PCI Express x16 Video Graphics Card
(No reviews yet)
Write a Review
NVIDIA
Part No: M2090 — NVIDIA Nvidia Tesla 6GB GDDR5 PCI Express x16 Video Graphics Card
Rating
Required
Select Rating1 star (worst)2 stars3 stars (average)4 stars5 stars (best)
Name
Email
Required
Review Subject
Required
Comments
Required
- Brand:
-
NVIDIA
- Part Number #
- M2090
- Availability:
- In Stock
$1,042. 80
$869.00
— You save $173.80
Get bulk pricing
-
Description -
Read Before Ordering
Description
NVIDIA Nvidia Tesla 6GB GDDR5 PCI Express x16 Video Graphics Card Mfr P/N M2090
View AllClose
- Related Products
- Customers Also Viewed
Related Products
Customers Also Viewed
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps and NVIDIA Tesla M2090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
Buy on Amazon
vs
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 36.4 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 1280 vs 512
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 1,331.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.
1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt - 2.4x more memory clock speed: 9028 MHz vs 3700 MHz
| Launch date | 20 April 2017 vs 25 July 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s vs 36.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops vs 1,331.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 9028 MHz vs 3700 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2090
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 11728 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
33.87 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2. 0 |
| Code name | GP106 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 20 April 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 822 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 1,331. 2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s | 36.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 3,000 million |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Interface | PCIe 3.
|