i5-8600K vs i7-8700 — Rainbow Six Siege with GTX 980 Ti Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 980 Ti with
Intel Core i5-8600K @ 3.60GHz
Rainbow Six Siege
GTX 980 Ti with
Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.20GHz
i5-8600K
i7-8700
Multi-Thread Performance
12811 Pts
15150 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2520 Pts
2628 Pts
Rainbow Six Siege
i5-8600K vs i7-8700 in Rainbow Six Siege using GTX 980 Ti — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i5-8600K
i7-8700
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
166.8 FPS |
| 1080p |
165.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
105.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
104.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
48. |
| 2160p |
48.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
82.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
82.0 FPS |
High Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
241.5 FPS |
| 1080p |
239.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
164.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
163.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
85.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
85.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
133.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
133.3 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
316.2 FPS |
| 1080p |
314.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
223.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
222. |
| 2160p |
122.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
121.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
185.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
184.5 FPS |
8 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
465.5 FPS |
| 1080p |
463.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
341.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
341.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
195.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
195.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
287.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
287.1 FPS |
i5-8600K
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
i7-8700
- The i7-8700 has higher Level 3 Cache.
This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads. - The i7-8700 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- The i7-8700 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
- The i7-8700 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Compare i5-8600K vs i7-8700 specifications
i5-8600K vs i7-8700 Architecture
| i5-8600K | i7-8700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Generation | Core i5 (Coffee Lake) |
Core i7 (Coffee Lake) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | SR3QU | SR3QS |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Oct 2017 | Jan 2018 |
i5-8600K vs i7-8700 Cache
| i5-8600K | i7-8700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 9MB (shared) | 12MB (shared) |
i5-8600K vs i7-8700 Cores
| i5-8600K | i7-8700 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 6 | 6 |
| # of Threads | 6 | 12 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i5-8600K vs i7-8700 Features
| i5-8600K | i7-8700 | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.  2AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
i5-8600K vs i7-8700 Notes
| i5-8600K | i7-8700 |
|---|
i5-8600K vs i7-8700 Performance
| i5-8600K | i7-8700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | 36.0x | 32.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |
| TDP | 95 W | 65 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.3 GHz | up to 4.6 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | variable |
i5-8600K vs i7-8700 Physical
| i5-8600K | i7-8700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | FC-LGA1151 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | unknown | unknown |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share Your Comments 94
Compare i5-8600K vs i7-8700 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Total War: Attila
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Civilization: Beyond Earth
2014
Dragon Age: Inquisition
2014
Far Cry 4
2014
GRID Autosport
2014
Shadow of Mordor
2014
The Talos Principle
2014
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Core i5-8600K vs Core i7-8700 CPU Comparison
Compare Intel 8th Generation Core i5 6 core CPU vs Intel 8th Generation Core i7 6 core processor, specs and benchmark score.
Which is the better CPU for gaming?
CPU Comparison
Quickly search and compare processors
Price
The cheapest price from our partner retailers
$ 275
$ 43.49
slightly less expensive
Overall Score
A combined score of all workloads
60 %
20%
slightly better overall score
Gaming Score
The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU
82 %
3%
slightly better gaming score
Multitasking Score
Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores
53 %
29%
slightly better multitasking score
Heavy Workload Score
Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores
51 %
27%
slightly better heavy workload score
Want to compare your processor against the Core i5-8600K and the Core i7-8700? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.
Download CPU Benchmark
Geekbench (multi) score
Multi threaded benchmark
5,784
6%
slightly higher Geekbench (multi) score
Geekbench (single) score
Single threaded benchmark
1,204
4%
slightly higher Geekbench (single) score
3DMark Physics score
Physics simulation benchmark
7,161
24%
slightly higher 3DMark Physics score
Cores
Number of physical processing units
6
Identical
Threads
Number of logical processing units
12
100%
significantly more threads
Clock Speed
Base frequency at which the chip operates
4 GHz
12%
slightly higher clock speed
Turbo Speed
Higher frequency used for heavy workloads
5 GHz
6%
slightly higher turbo speed
TDP
Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU
65 W
46%
significantly lower TDP
PCIe Lanes
Number of physical connections between the CPU and expansion slots
16
Identical
Memory Channels
Lanes for simultaneous memory access
2
Identical
Supported Memory
Maximum amount of RAM supported by this CPU
128 GiB
Identical
128 GiB
L1 Cache
Smallest embedded memory, but the fastest
384 KiB
Identical
384 KiB
L2 Cache
Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache
2 MiB
Identical
L3 Cache
General memory pool for all cores
12 MiB
33%
slightly more L3 cache
Rank
Ranking in the hardwareDB database
328th
of 1,328
242nd
of 1,328
Family
The product line
8th Generation Core i5
8th Generation Core i7
Release date
The official date of release of this chip
November 2017
November 2017
Memory Type
The type of memory used by this chip
DDR4-2666
DDR4-2666
Is Unlocked
Can this CPU can be overclocked
Yes
No
Supports ECC memory
Does this CPU support error correcting memory
No
No
Core i5-8600K vs Core i7-8700 specs and performance
In our benchmarks, the Core i7-8700 beats the Core i5-8600K in overall performance.
Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Core i5-8600K in all gaming tests too.
When comparing these CPUs we notice that they have the same number of cores but the Core i7-8700 has more threads. Our comparison shows that the Core i5-8600K has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Core i7-8700. Despite this, the Core i7-8700 has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Core i7-8700 outputs less heat than Core i5-8600K thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. In terms of cache, both these CPUs have the same amount of L2 cache. The Core i7-8700 also has slightly more L3 cache.
The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. For instance, the Core i5-8600K has the same number of threads as cores.
This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.
Latest posts
How to choose a power supply for your gaming PC: wattage and efficiencyJuly 11, 2022
How to compare GPUs and GPUs: find the best components for gamingJuly 02, 2022
Best PC benchmarking tools 2022: how to performance test your gaming PCJuly 02, 2022
Popular CPU Comparisons
Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen 7 5700G
Core i7-12700 vs Core i7-12700K
Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i7-11700K
Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i9-11900K
Core i5-10500T vs Core i5-10505
Core i7-11800H vs Core i7-12700H
Ryzen 5 5500U vs Core i5-10210U
Core i5-11600K vs Core i7-11700K
Core i5-8600K vs Core i7-12700K
Availability
Intel Core i5-8600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.
3 GHz Unlocked LGA 1151 300 Series 95W
Buy on Amazon
$260
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Availability
Intel Core i7-12700K Desktop Processor 12 (8P+4E) Cores up to 5.0 GHz Unlocked LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W
Buy on Amazon
$398.1
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700K is 1491 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
-
Up to 35% cheaper than Core i7-12700K — $260.0 vs $398.1
-
Up to 13% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i7-12700K — $0.9 vs $1.04 per FPS
-
Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700K — 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Performs up to 33% better in Apex Legends than Core i5-8600K — 383 vs 289 FPS
-
Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K — 20 vs 6 threads
-
Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn’t have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-8600K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
289
75%
Value, $/FPS
$0.
9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-8600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Unlocked LGA 1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Core i7-12700K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
383
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
87%
Price, $
$398.1
65%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-12700K Desktop Processor 12 (8P+4E) Cores up to 5.0 GHz Unlocked LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W
Buy for $398.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-8600K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Core i7-12700K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
1058
FPS
1360
FPS
League of Legends
265
FPS
345
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
462
FPS
599
FPS
VALORANT
242
FPS
315
FPS
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
289
FPS
383
FPS
Apex Legends
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-8600K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1211
64%
Multi-Core
5474
40%
Core i7-12700K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Single-Core
1898
100%
Multi-Core
13767
100%
|
Intel Core i5-8600K |
vs |
Intel Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date |
Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
| 6 | Cores |
12 |
| 6 | Threads |
20 |
3. 6 GHz |
Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed |
5.0 GHz |
|
95 W |
TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size |
10 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics |
UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i5-8600K or Core i7-12700K
Apex Legends, 1080p, High
Skytech Chronos Gaming PC
364 FPS
$6.32/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Core i7-12700K
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$2,299.99
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Dell XPS 8950 Gaming Desktop PC
238 FPS
$7.08/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i7-12700K
32 GB, 2 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,685.86
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Dell XPS 8950 Desktop PC
238 FPS
$6.
13/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i7-12700K
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,459
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Acer Predator Orion 7000 PO7-640-UR11 Gaming Desktop PC
364 FPS
$6.87/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Core i7-12700K
32 GB, 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$2,499
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
MSI Aegis RS (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC
364 FPS
$6.86/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Core i7-12700K
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$2,498.82
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
MSI Aegis RS (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC
341 FPS
$6.36/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Core i7-12700K
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$2,168.97
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Acer Predator Orion 7000 PO7-640-UR11 Tower, Intel i7-12700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, 32GB DDR5, 1TB SSD, 2TB HDD | Intel Wi-Fi 6E with Acer Predator XB283K KVbmiipruzx 28″ UHD 144Hz IPS Monitor PC
364 FPS
$8.
86/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Core i7-12700K
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$3,223.85
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
MSI Aegis RS (Tower) Gaming Desktop PC
314 FPS
$6.47/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Core i7-12700K
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$2,031.99
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Skytech Chronos Gaming PC
364 FPS
$6.87/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Core i7-12700K
32 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$2,499.99
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
2022 MSI Aegis RS 12TE-257US (i7-12700K, 32GB RAM, 2TB NVMe SSD + 2TB HDD, RTX 3080 10GB, Windows 11) Gaming Desktop PC
364 FPS
$7.41/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Core i7-12700K
32 GB, 2 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$2,699
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons.
Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Core i9-12900K
$538.89
Core i7-12700K
$398.1
Core i7-8700K
Core i7-12700K
$398.1
Core i7-12700K
$398.1
Core i5-12600K
$277.99
Core i7-12700K
$398.1
Core i9-11900K
$348.75
Core i7-12700K
$398.1
Core i9-10900K
Core i7-9700K
Core i7-12700K
$398.1
Core i7-10700K
$265.97
Core i7-12700K
$398.1
Core i5-9600K
$318.49
Core i7-12700K
$398.1
Core i7-12700K
$398.1
Core i7-4790K
N/A Stock
Intel Core i7-8700 vs. Intel Core i5-8600K
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i7-8700 runs with 6 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 4.60 GHz base 4.30 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W . CPU socket LGA 1151-2 This version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.
0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. In particular, the Coffee Lake S architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q4/2017
Intel Core i5-8600K
Intel Core i5-8600K runs with 6 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 4.30 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 95 W .The processor connects to LGA 1151- CPU socket 2 This version includes 9.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Coffee Lake S architecture has been advanced over 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q4/2017
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i5-8600K
30GHz Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 630
00MB Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS.
GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.
5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula.
As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
| Intel Core i7-8700 | Intel Core i5-8600K | |
| 65 W | Max TDP | 95W |
| N.A. | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Operating cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Operating cost per year | NA |
Popular comparison0001
GTX 1080 with
Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.
20GHz
Final Fantasy XV
GTX 1080 with
Intel Core i5-8600 @ 3.10GHz
i7-8700
i5-8600
Multi-Thread Performance
15150 Pts
12552 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2628 Pts
2517 Pts
Final Fantasy XV
i7-8700 vs i5-8600 Final Fantasy XV using GTX 1080 — processor performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K
i7-8700
i5-8600
Ultra quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
92.6 FPS |
| 1080p |
91.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
64.6 FPS |
| 1440p |
64.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
35.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
35. |
| w1440p |
53.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
53.4 FPS |
5 FPS High quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
147.7 FPS |
| 1080p |
146.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
108.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
108.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
65.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
65.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
92.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
92.5 FPS |
Medium quality
| Approval | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
202.8 FPS |
| 1080p |
201. |
| 1440p |
153.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
152.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
95.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
94.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
132.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
131.6 FPS |
6 FPS Low quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
312.9 FPS |
| 1080p |
311.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
241.6 FPS |
| 1440p |
240.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
154.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
154.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
210.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
209. |
9 FPS i7-8700
- The i7-8700 has a higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
- The i7-8700 has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
- The i7-8700 has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
i5-8600
Compare i7-8700 vs i5-8600 specifications
i7-8700 vs i5-8600
| i7-8700 | i5-8600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Generation | Core i7 (Coffee Lake) |
Core i5 (Coffee Lake) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | SR3QS | SR3X0 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Jan 2018 | Feb 2018 |
i7-8700 vs i5-8600 Cache
| i7-8700 | i5-8600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 12MB (shared) | 9MB (shared) |
i7-8700 vs i5-8600 Cores
| i7-8700 | i5-8600 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 6 | 6 |
| # of Threads | 12 | 6 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-8700 vs i5-8600 Features
| i7-8700 | i5-8600 | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.  2AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
i7-8700 vs i5-8600 Performance
| i7-8700 | i5-8600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Multiplier | 32.0x | 31.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |
| TDP | 65W | 65W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.6 GHz | up to 4.3 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | variable |
i7-8700 vs i5-8600 Physical
| i7-8700 | i5-8600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | FC-LGA1151 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | unknown | unknown |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share your comments 95
Compare i7-8700 vs i5-8600 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need for Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
F1 2018
2018
Far Cry 5
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Shadow of War
2017
Total War: Warhammer II
2017
Wolfenstein II
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i7-8086K or Intel Core i5-8600K
- Home
- >
- On average, gaming performance is 3% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 3%.
Core i7-8086K
81.9 (+3.1%)
Core i5-8600K
79.4
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core i7-8086K
81.1 (+3.1%)
Core i5-8600K
78.6
Performance in day-to-day activities such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i7-8086K
55.
4 (+11.4%)
Core i5-8600K
49.1
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
|
Core i7-8086K 78.9 (+4.4%) Core i5-8600K 75.4 |
Demanding games and tasks |
|
Core i7-8086K 59. Core i5-8600K 54 |
9 (+9.8%)
Extreme |
|
Core i7-8086K 19.2 (+31.8%) Core i5-8600K 13.1 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16.
Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i7-8086K
1321 (+4.5%)
Intel Core i5-8600K
1261
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-8086K
10209 (+33.1 %)
Intel Core i5-8600K
6832
Cinebench R15 Single Core
Intel Core i7-8086K
219 (+16.4%)
Intel Core i5-8600K
183
Cinebench R15 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-8086K
1448 (+28.2%)
Intel Core i5-8600k
1040
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Core i7-8086k
1335 (+6.3%)
Intel Core I5-8600K
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-8086K
7031 (+19.9%)
Intel Core i5-8600K
5631
Blender 2.81 bmw27
Intel Core i7-8086K
224.4
Intel Core i5 -8600K
374.8 (+40.1%)
Geekbench 3 Single Core
Intel Core i7-8086K
5410 (+15.7%)
Intel Core i5-8600K
4561
Geekbench 3 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-8086K
27451 (+24.
8 %)
Intel Core i5-8600k
20638
Cinebench R11.5
Intel Core i7-8086K
2.61 (+13%)
Intel i5-8600k
7 2.27 9000 27 9000 27 9000 27 9000 27 9000 27 9000 27 9000 27 9000 27 9000 27 9000 27 9000 27 9000 27 9000 27 9000 27 9000 27
Intel Core i7-8086K
15.96 (+30. )
Passmark
Intel Core i7-8086k
14721 (+31.1%)
Intel Core i5-8600K
10149
Characteristics of the Data data still not filled, therefore, there may not be enough information in the tables. functions.
Basic
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Core™ i7-8086K Processor (12M Cache, up to 5.00 GHz) | Intel® Core™ i5-8600K Processor (9M Cache, up to 4. 30 GHz) |
| ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Date of IssueMonth and year of the processor’s availability. | 10-2020 | 10-2020 |
| Model Official name. | i7-8086K | i5-8600K |
| Cores The number of physical cores. | 6 | 6 |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. |
12 | 6 |
| Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). | Missing |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. |
4GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Turbo frequency The maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. | 5 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 12 MB | 9 MB |
| Instructions | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. |
Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | SSE4.1/4.2, AVX2 |
| Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | No | No |
| Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| Number of QPI links | ||
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. |
95 W | 95 W |
| Cooling system specifications | PCG 2015D (130W) | PCG 2015C (130W) |
Video core
| Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 |
| GPU base clockFrequency of 2D and idle operation. | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. |
1200 MHz | 1150MHz |
| Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | ||
| Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. | 3 | 3 |
RAM
| Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Supported type of RAM The type of RAM determines its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. |
2 | 2 |
| RAM bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
| ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. | No data | No data |
PCI
| PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | 3 | 3 |
| PCI configuration options | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
| Number of PCI lanes | 16 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Data security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. |
No data | No data |
| Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
| Dimensions | No data | No data |
| Supported sockets | No data | No data |
| Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |