I7 870 vs e5450: Intel Core i7 870 vs Xeon E5450

Intel Core i7 870 vs Xeon E5450

UserBenchmark: Intel Core i7 870 vs Xeon E5450

  • CPU
  • GPU
  • SSD
  • HDD
  • RAM
  • USB

VS

YouTube*NEW*

About

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 40,883 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

10,608 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 59% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 41% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)

Poor: 41%

Great: 59%

SPEED RANK: 726th / 1368

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

30,275 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 74% Base clock 3. 55 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 57% Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)

Poor: 57%

Great: 74%

SPEED RANK: 411th / 1368

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 51%

Yacht

Effective Speed

Effective CPU Speed
51.5 % 67.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+32%
Memory

Avg. Memory Latency
72 Pts 89.3 Pts Lower memory latency.
+24%
1-Core

Avg. Single Core Speed
47.2 Pts 78.9 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+67%
2-Core

Avg. Dual Core Speed
94.2 Pts 148 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+57%
4-Core

Avg. Quad Core Speed
181 Pts 254 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+40%
8-Core

Avg. Octa Core Speed
183 Pts 352 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+92%
Memory

OC Memory Latency
81. 1 Pts 95 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+17%
1-Core

OC Single Core Speed
57.7 Pts 89.6 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+55%
2-Core

OC Dual Core Speed
116 Pts 172 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+48%
4-Core

OC Quad Core Speed
229 Pts 315 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+38%
8-Core

OC Octa Core Speed
229 Pts 399 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+74%

Market Share

Based on 56,351,308 CPUs tested.

See market share leaders

Market Share

Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.08 % Hugely higher market share.
+700%
Value

Value For Money
56.7 % 80.4 % Much better value.
+42%
User Rating

UBM User Rating
54 % +2% 53 %
Price

Price (score)
$195 $149 Cheaper.
+24%
Age

Newest
103+ Months +3% 106+ Months
64-Core

OC Multi Core Speed
230 Pts 399 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+73%
64-Core

Avg. Multi Core Speed
184 Pts 356 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+93%
Launch Date

Launch Date
Q4’07 Q3’09
Cache

Cache
12 MB L2 8 MB SmartCache
VID Voltage Range

VID Voltage Range
0.850V-1.3500V 0.6500V-1.4000V
Recommended Price

Recommended Customer Price
$969.00 $305. 00
Bus Speed

Bus Speed
1333 MHz FSB 2.5 GT/s DMI
Processing Die Size

Processing Die Size
214 mm2 296 mm2
# of Processing Die Transistors

# of Processing Die Transistors
820 million 774 million
Thermal Monitoring Technologies

Thermal Monitoring Technologies
Yes No
Turbo Boost Tech

Intel® Turbo Boost Technology ‡
No 1.0
Hyper-Threading Tech

Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology ‡
No Yes
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) ‡
No Yes
Demand Based Switching

Intel® Demand Based Switching
Yes No
Trusted Execution Tech

Intel® Trusted Execution Technology ‡
No Yes
More specs » More specs »

ADVERTISEMENT

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works
  • — Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark. com.
  • — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • — See speed test results from other users.
  • — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

  •   

    Intel Core i5-13600K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12400F

  •   

    Intel Core i7-12700K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12600K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12400

  •   

    Intel Core i9-13900K

  •   

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

  •   

    Intel Core i3-12100F

  •   

    AMD Ryzen 5 3600

  •   

    Intel Core i7-11700K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-11400F

  •   

    Intel Core i5-9600K

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback

Dual Intel Xeon E5450 vs Intel Core i7-870








Dual Intel Xeon E5450 vs Intel Core i7-870

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Dual Intel Xeon E5450 on one side and the Intel Core i7-870 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the server sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,0GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor

Dual Intel Xeon E5450

Intel Core i7-870
Market (main)

Server

Desktop
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Penryn

Nehalem
Core name

Harpertown

Lynnfield
Family

Xeon E5400

Core i7-800
Part number(s), S-Spec

BX80574E5450A,

BX80574E5450P,

AT80574KJ080N,

EU80574KJ080N,

Q5YQ, QFUF,

SLANQ, SLBBM

BX80605I7870,

BXC80605I7870,

BV80605001905AI,

Q3AJ, SLBJG

Release date

Q4 2007

Q3 2009
Lithography

45 nm

45 nm
Transistors

1. 640.000.000

774.000.000
Cores

8

4
Threads

8

8
Base frequency

3,0 GHz

2,9 GHz
Turbo frequency

3,6 GHz
Bus speed

2,66 GT/s

2,5 GT/s
Cache memory

24 MB

8 MB
Max memory capacity

16 GB

16 GB
Memory types

DDR2 SDRAM, DDR3 SDRAM

DDR3 1066/1333
Max # of memory channels

6

2
Max PCIe lanes

56

16
TDP

160 W

95 W
Suggested PSU

700W ATX Power Supply

600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics

None

None
Socket

LGA771

LGA1156
Compatible motherboard

Socket LGA 771 Motherboard 

Socket LGA 1156 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature

67°C

72. 7°C
CPU-Z single thread

278

322
CPU-Z multi thread

2.280

1.782
Cinebench R15 single thread

102

95
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

676

509
Cinebench R20 single thread

236

210
Cinebench R20 multi-thread

1.412

1.019
PassMark single thread

1.266

1.387
PassMark CPU Mark

4.674

3. 036
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core

1.963

2.983
(Linux 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

10.256

9.139
(Linux)
Geekbench 5 single core

453

572
(Linux)
Geekbench 5 multi-core

2.362

2.188
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

126,9 GFLOPS

66,72 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

64 pts / W

96 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-870 is bigger, that the PDT of Dual Intel Xeon E5450 is lower. The Intel Core i7-870 was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual Intel Xeon E5450

278

2.280
Intel Core i7-870

322

1.782

In single core, the difference is -14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 28%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual Intel Xeon E5450

102

676
Intel Core i7-870

95

509

In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 33%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Dual Intel Xeon E5450

236

1.412
Intel Core i7-870

210

1.019

In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 39%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Dual Intel Xeon E5450

1.266

4.674
Intel Core i7-870

1.387

3.036

In single core, the difference is -9%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 54%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Dual Intel Xeon E5450

1.824

8.904
Intel Core i7-870

2.585

8.548

In single core, the difference is -29%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 4%.

On Linux 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Dual Intel Xeon E5450

1. 963

10.256
Intel Core i7-870

2.983

9.139

In single core, the difference is -34%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 12%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
Dual Intel Xeon E5450

1.827

9.220
Intel Core i7-870

2.685

8.616

In single core, the difference is -32%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 7%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Dual Intel Xeon E5450

428

2.456
Intel Core i7-870

557

2.064

In single core, the difference is -23%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 19%.

On Linux:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Dual Intel Xeon E5450

453

2.362
Intel Core i7-870

572

2.188

In single core, the difference is -21%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 8%.

On macOS:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS
Intel Core i7-870

580

2.092
Dual Intel Xeon E5450

437

1.977

In single core, the difference is 33%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 6%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems.