I7 8700t vs i7 8700: Intel Core i7-8700 vs i7-8700T

Intel Core i7-8700T vs Intel Core i7-8700

Summary

Intel Core i7-8700T

100%
Intel Core i7-8700

124%

Relative performance

Intel Core i7-8700T

100%
Intel Core i7-8700

115%

Relative performance

Intel Core i7-8700T

100%
Intel Core i7-8700

133%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-8700T

None

Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-8700

15% higher single threaded performance.

Much higher multi threaded performance (around 33% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.

Around 24% higher average synthetic performance.

Gaming

HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-8700

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

Productivity

HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-8700

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

Features

Intel Core i7-8700T			Intel Core i7-8700
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
HTT
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2. 0

Architecture

	Intel Core i7-8700T		Intel Core i7-8700
Architecture	Intel_Coffelake	vs	Intel_Coffelake
Market	Desktop	vs	Desktop
Memory Support	DDR4	vs	DDR4
Codename	Coffee Lake	vs	Coffee Lake
Release Date	Apr 2018	vs	Jan 2018

Cores

	Intel Core i7-8700T		Intel Core i7-8700
Cores	6	vs	6
Threads	12	vs	12
SMPs	1	vs	1
Integrated Graphics	UHD Graphics 630	vs	Intel UHD 630

Cache

	Intel Core i7-8700T		Intel Core i7-8700
L1 Cache	64 KB (per core)	vs	64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache	256 KB (per core)	vs	256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache	12288 KB (shared)	vs	12288 KB (shared)

Physical

	Intel Core i7-8700T		Intel Core i7-8700
Socket	Intel Socket 1151	vs	Intel Socket 1151
Max Case Temp	72°C	vs	72°C
Package	FC-LGA1151	vs	FC-LGA1151
Die Size	unknown	vs	151mmÂ²
Process	14 nm	vs	14 nm

Performance

	Intel Core i7-8700T		Intel Core i7-8700
Cpu Frequency	2400 MHz	vs	3200 MHz
Turbo Clock	4000 MHz	vs	4600 MHz
Base Clock	100 MHz	vs	100 MHz
Voltage	variable	vs	unknown
TDP	35 W	vs	65 W

Intel Core i7-8700T

4800 points
Intel Core i7-8700

5520 points

Points — higher is better

Intel Core i7-8700T

20736 points
Intel Core i7-8700

27648 points

Points — higher is better

Intel Core i7-8700T (simulated)

171. 91
Intel Core i7-8700 (simulated)

197.7

points — higher is better

Intel Core i7-8700T (simulated)

915.89
Intel Core i7-8700 (simulated)

1221.19

points — higher is better

Intel Core i7-8700T vs Intel Core i5-1240P Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

Intel Core i7-8700T vs Intel Core i5-1240P

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-8700T on one side and the Intel Core i5-1240P on the other side. The first is dedicated to the mini desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,0GHz. The second is used on the notebook segment, it has a total of 12 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor	Intel Core i7-8700T	Intel Core i5-1240P
Market (main)	Mini desktop	Notebook
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Coffee Lake	Alder Lake
Core name	Coffee Lake-S	Alder Lake-P
Family	Core i7-8000	Core i5-1200
Part number(s), S-Spec	CM8068403358413, QP4P, SR3WX	FJ8071504787907, SRLD9
Release date	Q2 2018	Q1 2022
Lithography	14 nm++	Intel 7
Transistors	3. 000.000.000	—
Cores	6	12
Threads	12	16
Base frequency	2,4 GHz	1,7 GHz
Turbo frequency	4,0 GHz	4,4 GHz
Energy cores	—	8 Cores 8 Threads @ 1,2 / 3,3 GHz
High performance cores	—	4 Cores 8 Threads @ 1,7 / 4,4 GHz
Cache memory	12 MB	12 MB
Max memory capacity	128 GB	64 GB
Memory types	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-5200
Max # of memory channels	2	2
Max PCIe lanes	16	20
TDP	35 W	28 W
GPU integrated graphics	Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake)	Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
GPU execution units	23	80
GPU shading units	184	640
GPU base clock	350 MHz	300 MHz
GPU boost clock	1200 MHz	1300 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point	423,2 GFLOPS	1. 664 GFLOPS
Socket	LGA1151	BGA1744
Compatible motherboard	Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard	—
Maximum temperature	100°C	100°C
AI accelerator	—	Gaussian & Neural Accelerator, Deep Learning Boost
Crypto engine	AES New Instructions, Secure Key	AES New Instructions, Secure Key
Security	Software Guard Extensions, Memory Protection Extensions, OS Guard, Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard	OS Guard, Boot Guard, Execute Disable Bit, Mode-based Execute Control, Control-Flow Enforcement Technology
Max display resolution	4096 x 2304@60Hz	4096 x 2304@60Hz (HDMI), 7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP), 4096 x 2304@120Hz (eDP)
CPU-Z single thread	422	547
CPU-Z multi thread	3. 013	5.028
Cinebench R15 single thread	176	222
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	1.133	1.543
Cinebench R20 single thread	387	576
Cinebench R20 multi-thread	2.860	2.985
PassMark single thread	2.371	3.648
PassMark CPU Mark	10.717	21.635
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	4.721	7.137
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	19. 333	34.466
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core	1.074	1.580
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core	4.878	6.743
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	552 pts / W	1.231 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Core i5-1240P has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-1240P is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i5-1240P is less. The Intel Core i5-1240P was started more recently.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-1240P	547 5. 028
Intel Core i7-8700T	422 3.013

In single core, the difference is 30%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 67%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-1240P	222 1.543
Intel Core i7-8700T	176 1. 133

In single core, the difference is 26%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 36%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-1240P	576 2.985
Intel Core i7-8700T	387 2. 860

In single core, the difference is 49%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i5-1240P	3.648 21.635
Intel Core i7-8700T	2.371 10. 717

In single core, the difference is 54%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 102%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i5-1240P	7.137 34.466
Intel Core i7-8700T	4.721 19. 333

In single core, the difference is 51%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 78%.

On Linux 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i5-1240P	7.159 34.128
Intel Core i7-8700T	3.996 17.333

In single core, the difference is 79%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 97%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Core i5-1240P	1.580 6.743
Intel Core i7-8700T	1.074 4.878

In single core, the difference is 47%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 38%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Core i5-1240P	1.729 7.856
Intel Core i7-8700T	1.046 4.790

In single core, the difference is 65%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 64%.

On Android:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Core i5-1240P	1.414 7.933
Intel Core i7-8700T	1.090 4.478

In single core, the difference is 30%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 77%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems.