Quadro p620 vs 1660ti: Quadro P620 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti [in 18 benchmarks]

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City

We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1660-ti-vs-quadro-p620%23memory-specs

Popular graphics cards comparisons

GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs

GeForce RTX
3060

GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs

GeForce RTX
3060

GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs

GeForce RTX
3070

GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs

Radeon RX
580

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs

GeForce GTX
1650

GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs

GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards

GeForce RTX
4090

GeForce GTX
1660 Super

GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

GeForce RTX
3060

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

GeForce RTX
3070

Popular CPU comparisons

Ryzen 5
5600X

vs

Core i5
12400F

Ryzen 5
3600

vs

Core i5
10400F

Core i5
10400F

vs

Core i3
12100F

Ryzen 5
3600

vs

Ryzen 5
5600X

Ryzen 5
5600X

vs

Ryzen 5
5600G

Ryzen 5
3600

vs

Core i3
12100F

Popular CPUs

Ryzen 5
5500U

Ryzen 5
5600X

Core i5
12400F

Core i3
1115G4

Core i3
12100F

EPYC
7h22

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City

We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1660-ti-vs-quadro-p620%23benchmarks

Popular graphics cards comparisons

GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs

GeForce RTX
3060

GeForce RTX
2060 Super

vs

GeForce RTX
3060

GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs

GeForce RTX
3070

GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

vs

Radeon RX
580

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs

GeForce GTX
1650

GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs

GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards

GeForce RTX
4090

GeForce GTX
1660 Super

GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

GeForce RTX
3060

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

GeForce RTX
3070

Popular CPU comparisons

Ryzen 5
5600X

vs

Core i5
12400F

Ryzen 5
3600

vs

Core i5
10400F

Core i5
10400F

vs

Core i3
12100F

Ryzen 5
3600

vs

Ryzen 5
5600X

Ryzen 5
5600X

vs

Ryzen 5
5600G

Ryzen 5
3600

vs

Core i3
12100F

Popular CPUs

Ryzen 5
5500U

Ryzen 5
5600X

Core i5
12400F

Core i3
1115G4

Core i3
12100F

EPYC
7h22

NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (mobile) comparison, which is better?

Home / Navidia QUADRO P620 VS NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1660 TI (Mobile)

NVIDIA QUADRO P620

78%

Devicelist

VS

NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1660 TI (mobile)

9000 9000 960 TI) DeviceList Score

We compared the specifications of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and compiled a list of benefits and comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2023.

NVIDIA Quadro P620 Benefits

Value for money

97.2% 36.8% (60.9%) better than vs 60.4%

Benefits NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Comparison Winner

Number of shader processors

1536 1024 (200%) better than vs 512

Core frequency

1455 MHz At 278 MHz (23.6%) better than vs 1177 MHz

Boost frequency

1590 MHz At 236 MHz (17.4%) better than vs 1354 MHz

Process

12 nm -2 nm (-14. 3%) better than vs 14 nm

Maximum memory size

6 GB 4 GB (200%) better than vs 2 GB

Memory bus width

192 bit 64 bit (50%) better than vs 128 bit

Memory frequency

12000 MHz At 6992 MHz (139.6%) better than vs 5008 MHz

Memory bandwidth

288 207.87 (259.4%) better than vs 80.13

General information
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
97.2% 36.8% (60.9%) better than	60.4%
Architecture
Pascal	Turing
Codename
GP107	TU116
Type
Mobile workstation	For laptops
Release price
n/a	229 $
Number of shaders
512	1536 1024 (200%) better than
Core clock
1177MHz	1455 MHz At 278 MHz (23.6%) better than
Boost frequency
1354 MHz	1590 MHz At 236 MHz (17. 4%) better than
Number of transistors
3.300 million	6.600 million
Process
14 nm	12 nm -2 nm (-14.3%) better than
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Power Demand (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
40W	no data
Additional power connectors
no	no data
Multi Monitor
+	no data
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.
+	no data
Video connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
DirectX
12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Floating point performance
1.490 gflops	no data

benchmark

Memory
Memory Type
GDR5	GDDR6
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, use high resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.
2GB	6 GB 4 GB (200%) better than
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games.
128 bit	192 bit 64 bit (50%) better than
Shared memory
—	—
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.
5008 MHz	12000 MHz At 6992 MHz (139.6%) better than
Memory bandwidth The greater the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective RAM the PC can use.
80.13	288 207.87 (259.4%) better than

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro P620

Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro P620 according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

versus

NVIDIA Quadro P620

Benefits

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

• Newer graphics card, approx. 1500 MHz vs 1266 MHz
• 31% more core clock in Boost mode: 1770 MHz vs 1354 MHz
• 0556
• 2. 4 times faster memory frequency: 12000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 3.6 times faster performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 12917 vs 3593
• About 45% faster performance in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark greater: 823 vs 569
• 5.5 times greater performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 68807 vs 12475
• 4.6 times greater performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) benchmark: 202.702 vs 43.877
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) benchmark: 2572.509 vs 773.248
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) benchmark ) greater: 16.493 vs 3.082
• 2.7 times greater performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark: 144.404 vs 53.425
• performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) benchmark 5 time(s) more: 927.813 vs 184.343
• 4.7 times greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) benchmark: 16952 vs 3575
• 4. 7 times greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) benchmark: 16952 vs 3575

Issue date	22 February 2019 vs 1 February 2018
Core frequency	1500 MHz vs 1266 MHz
Boost core clock	1770 MHz vs 1354 MHz
Process	12 nm vs 14 nm
Memory frequency	12000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
PassMark — G3D Mark	12917 vs 3593
PassMark — G2D Mark	823 vs 569
Geekbench — OpenCL	68807 vs 12475
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	202.702 vs 43.877
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2572.509 vs 773.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	16.493 vs 3.082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	144.404 vs 53.425
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	927.813 vs 184.343
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	16952 vs 3575
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	16 Performance in GFXBench 4. 0 benchmark — T-Rex (Fps) about 98% more: 6631 vs 3355 Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt vs 120 Watt GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3881 vs 3718 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 6631 vs 3355 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3881 vs 3718 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 6631 vs 3355 Benchmark comparison GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P620 PassMark — G3D Mark GPU 1 GPU 2 PassMark — G2D Mark GPU 1 GPU 2 Geekbench — OpenCL GPU 1 GPU 2 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) GPU 1 GPU 2 202.702 43.877 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) GPU 1 GPU 2 2572.509 773.248 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) GPU 1 GPU 2 16. 493 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) GPU 1 GPU 2 144.404 53.425 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) GPU 1 GPU 2 927.813 184.343 GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) GPU 1 GPU 2 Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA Quadro P620 PassMark — G3D Mark 12917 3593 PassMark — G2D Mark 823 569 Geekbench — OpenCL 68807 12475 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 202.702 43.877 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2572.509 773.248 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.493 3.082 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 144.404 53.425 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 927.813 184.343 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16952 3575 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3718 3881 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3355 6631 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16952 3575 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3718 3881 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3355 6631 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 6276 Performance comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA Quadro P620 Architecture Turing Pascal Codename TU116 GP107 Issue date 22 February 2019 February 1, 2018 Price at first issue date $279 Place in the ranking 139 501 Price now $279. 99 $176.99 Type Desktop Workstation Price/performance ratio (0-100) 67.32 25.53 Boost core clock 1770MHz 1354 MHz Core frequency 1500 MHz 1266 MHz Process 12nm 14nm Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 40 Watt Number of transistors 6,600 million 3,300 million Floating point performance 1. 490 gflops Number of shaders 512 Texturing speed 46.56 GTexel/s Video connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 4x mini-DisplayPort Number of DisplayPort 1 DisplayPort support HDMI Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3. 0 x16 Length 229 mm 145mm Additional power connectors 1x 8-pin None DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1) OpenGL 4.6 4.6 Memory frequency 12000 MHz 5012 MHz Maximum memory size 2GB Memory bandwidth 64.