I9 8950hk vs i7 8700k: Intel Core i7-8700K vs i9-8950HK

Intel Core i9 8950HK vs i7 8700K: performance comparison

Intel Core i9 8950HK

Intel Core i7 8700K

We compared two 6-core CPUs: the 2.9 GHz Intel Core i9 8950HK (laptop) against the 3.7 GHz i7 8700K (desktop). On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review
Differences
Performance
Specs
Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Core i9 8950HK

Core i7 8700K

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Core i9 8950HK

Core i7 8700K

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Core i9 8950HK

Core i7 8700K

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Core i9 8950HK

Core i7 8700K

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 8700K and 8950HK

Advantages of Intel Core i9 8950HK

Consumes up to 53% less energy than the Core i7 8700K – 45 vs 95 Watt
Newer — released 6-months later
2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 8 GHz vs 4.7 GHz)

Advantages of Intel Core i7 8700K

Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666 RAM
16% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1242 vs 1071 points

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Core i9 8950HK

1197

Core i7 8700K
+2%

1219

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Core i9 8950HK

7008

Core i7 8700K
+27%

8881

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Core i9 8950HK

2507

Core i7 8700K
+11%

2781

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Core i9 8950HK

10854

Core i7 8700K
+28%

13898

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Core i9 8950HK

1077

Core i7 8700K
+16%

1251

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Core i9 8950HK

5312

Core i7 8700K
+26%

6690

▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 8950HK and i7 8700K

General

Vendor	Intel	Intel
Released	April 3, 2018	October 5, 2017
Type	Laptop	Desktop
instruction set	x86-64	x86-64
Codename	Coffee Lake	Coffee Lake
Model number	i9-8950HK	i7-8700K
Socket	BGA-1440	LGA-1151
Integrated GPU	UHD Graphics 630	UHD Graphics 630

Performance

Cores	6	6
Threads	12	12
Base Frequency	2. 9 GHz	3.7 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency	4.8 GHz	4.7 GHz
Bus frequency	—	100 MHz
Multiplier	37x	37x
Bus Bandwidth	8 GT/s	8 GT/s
L1 Cache	64K (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
L3 Cache	12MB (shared)	12MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier	Yes	Yes

Fabrication process	14 nm	14 nm
TDP	45 W	95 W
Max. temperature	100°C	100°C

Integrated Graphics	Intel UHD Graphics 630	Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU Base Clock	350 MHz	350 MHz
GPU Boost Clock	1200 MHz	1200 MHz
Shading Units	192	192
TMUs	24	24
ROPs	3	3
Execution Units	24	24
TGP	15 W	15 W
Max. Resolution	4096×2304 — 60 Hz	4096×2304 — 60 Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Core i9 8950HK

0.38 TFLOPS

Core i7 8700K

0.38 TFLOPS

Memory support

Memory types	DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133	DDR4-2666
Memory Size	64 GB	128 GB
Max. Memory Channels	2	2
Max. Memory Bandwidth	41.8 GB/s	41.6 GB/s
ECC Support	No	No

Official site	Intel Core i9 8950HK official page	Intel Core i7 8700K official page
PCI Express Version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express Lanes	16	16
Extended instructions	SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2	SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Core i9 8950HK

0 (0%)

Core i7 8700K

1 (100%)

Total votes: 1

ompetitors

1.
Intel Core i7 8700K or AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

2.
Intel Core i7 8700K or i9 12900K

3.
Intel Core i7 8700K or i7 12700K

4.
Intel Core i7 8700K or i5 12600K

5.
Intel Core i7 8700K or i5 12400F

Intel Core i7-8700K vs Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i7-8700K vs Intel Core i9-8950HK

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-8700K on one side and the Intel Core i9-8950HK on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,7GHz. The second is used on the big gaming laptop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,8 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor	Intel Core i7-8700K	Intel Core i9-8950HK
Market (main)	Desktop	Big gaming laptop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Coffee Lake	Coffee Lake
Core name	Coffee Lake-S	Coffee Lake-H
Family	Core i7-8000	Core i9-8000
Part number(s), S-Spec	BX80684I78700K, BXC80684I78700K, CM8068403358220, SR3QR, QNMK	CL8068403805708, SRCKN
Release date	Q4 2017	Q2 2018
Lithography	14 nm++	14 nm++
Transistors	3. 000.000.000	—
Cores	6	6
Threads	12	12
Base frequency	3,7 GHz	2,9 GHz
Turbo frequency	4,7 GHz	4,8 GHz
Bus speed	8 GT/s	8 GT/s
Cache memory	12 MB	12 MB
Max memory capacity	128 GB	64 GB
Memory types	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133
Max # of memory channels	2	2
Max memory bandwidth	41,6 GB/s	41,8 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes	16	16
TDP	95 W	45 W
Suggested PSU	600W ATX Power Supply	—
GPU integrated graphics	Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake)	Intel UHD Graphics 630 Mobile (Coffee Lake)
GPU execution units	23	24
GPU shading units	184	192
GPU base clock	350 MHz	350 MHz
GPU boost clock	1200 MHz	1200 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point	423,2 GFLOPS	384 GFLOPS
Socket	LGA1151	BGA1440
Compatible motherboard	Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard	—
Maximum temperature	100°C	100°C
Crypto engine	AES New Instructions, Secure Key	—
Security	Software Guard Extensions, Memory Protection Extensions, OS Guard, Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard	—
Max display resolution	4096 x 2304@60Hz	—
CPU-Z single thread	475	509
CPU-Z multi thread	3. 693	3.526
Cinebench R15 single thread	194	204
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	1.402	1.083
Cinebench R20 single thread	500	440
Cinebench R20 multi-thread	3.618	2.650
PassMark single thread	2.775	2.474
PassMark CPU Mark	13.883	10.821
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	6.100	5.185
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	24. 045	21.702
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core	1.320	1.148
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core	6.646	5.242
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	453,8 GFLOPS	398,9 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	253 pts / W	482 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i9-8950HK is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i9-8950HK is less. The Intel Core i9-8950HK was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-8700K	475 3. 693
Intel Core i9-8950HK	509 3.526

In single core, the difference is -7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 5%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-8700K	194 1.402
Intel Core i9-8950HK	204 1. 083

In single core, the difference is -5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 29%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-8700K	500 3.618
Intel Core i9-8950HK	440 2. 650

In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 37%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i7-8700K	2.775 13.883
Intel Core i9-8950HK	2.474 10. 821

In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 28%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700K	6.100 24.045
Intel Core i9-8950HK	5.185 21.702

In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 11%.

On Linux 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700K	6.115 27.677
Intel Core i9-8950HK	5.700 21.346

In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 30%.

On Android 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700K	5.646 21.101
Intel Core i9-8950HK	4.179 15.998

In single core, the difference is 35%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 32%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700K	6. 084 28.485
Intel Core i9-8950HK	5.369 23.086

In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 23%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Core i7-8700K	1. 320 6.646
Intel Core i9-8950HK	1.148 5.242

In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 27%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Core i7-8700K	1.314 5.720
Intel Core i9-8950HK	1.163 5.377

In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 6%.

On Android:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Core i7-8700K	1.095 4.330
Intel Core i9-8950HK	1. 150 3.851

In single core, the difference is -5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 12%.

On macOS:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS
Intel Core i7-8700K	1.080 6.572
Intel Core i9-8950HK	1.026 5.112

In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 29%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Equivalence:

Intel Core i7-8700K AMD equivalentIntel Core i9-8950HK AMD equivalent

Intel Core i9-8950HK vs Intel Core i7-8700K

Comparative analysis of Intel Core i9-8950HK and Intel Core i7-8700K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Buy on Amazon

Intel Core i7-8700K

Buy on Amazon

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i9-8950HK

CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 2% higher clock speed: 4.80 GHz vs 4.70 GHz
Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
2. 1x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 95 Watt

Launch date	3 March 2018 vs 5 January 2017
Maximum frequency	4.80 GHz vs 4.70 GHz
L1 cache	384 KB vs 256 KB
L2 cache	1.5 MB vs 1 MB
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 95 Watt

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-8700K

2x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 64 GB
Around 11% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2756 vs 2485
Around 28% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 13804 vs 10763
Around 14% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 1276 vs 1117
Around 29% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 6678 vs 5166
Around 35% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score: 7702 vs 5686
Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.279 vs 7.809
Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 88.131 vs 65.701
Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.084 vs 0.914
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 4.763 vs 3.409
Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.047 vs 8.455
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2083 vs 1687
5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 4305 vs 812
4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 7198 vs 1678
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2083 vs 1687
5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 4305 vs 812
4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 7198 vs 1678

Maximum memory size	128 GB vs 64 GB
PassMark — Single thread mark	2756 vs 2485
PassMark — CPU mark	13804 vs 10763
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	1276 vs 1117
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	6678 vs 5166
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	7702 vs 5686
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	9.279 vs 7.809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	88.131 vs 65.701
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.084 vs 0.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	4.763 vs 3.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	12.047 vs 8.455
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2083 vs 1687
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	4305 vs 812
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames)	7198 vs 1678
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2083 vs 1687
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	4305 vs 812
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	7198 vs 1678

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Core i9-8950HK
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-8700K

PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.

5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

65.701

88.131

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.

5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

12.047

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

GFXBench 4.

0 — Manhattan (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

GFXBench 4.

0 — Manhattan (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

Name	Intel Core i9-8950HK	Intel Core i7-8700K
PassMark — Single thread mark	2485	2756
PassMark — CPU mark	10763	13804
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	1117	1276
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	5166	6678
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	5686	7702
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	7.809	9.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	65.701	88.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.914	1.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	3.409	4.763
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	8.455	12.047
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1687	2083
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	812	4305
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	1678	7198
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1687	2083
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	812	4305
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	1678	7198

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Core i9-8950HK	Intel Core i7-8700K
Architecture codename	Coffee Lake	Coffee Lake
Launch date	3 March 2018	5 January 2017
Launch price (MSRP)	$583	$420
Place in performance rating	1203	496
Price now	$583	$358. 99
Processor Number	i9-8950HK	i7-8700K
Series	8th Generation Intel® Core™ i9 Processors	8th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors
Status	Launched	Launched
Value for money (0-100)	7.32	13.10
Vertical segment	Mobile	Desktop
64 bit support
Base frequency	2. 90 GHz	3.70 GHz
Bus Speed	8 GT/s DMI	8 GT/s DMI3
Die size	149 mm
L1 cache	384 KB	256 KB
L2 cache	1.5 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	12 MB	12288 KB
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C	72 °C
Maximum core temperature	100°C	100°C
Maximum frequency	4. 80 GHz	4.70 GHz
Number of cores	6	6
Number of threads	12	12
Unlocked
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	41.8 GB/s	41.6 GB/s
Maximum memory size	64 GB	128 GB
Supported memory types	DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133	DDR4-2666
Device ID	0x3E9B	0x3E92
Graphics base frequency	350 MHz	350 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency	1. 20 GHz	1.20 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Clear Video technology
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Max video memory	64 GB	64 GB
Processor graphics	Intel® UHD Graphics 630	Intel® UHD Graphics 630
DisplayPort
DVI
eDP
HDMI
Number of displays supported	3	3
4K resolution support
Max resolution over DisplayPort	[email protected]	[email protected]
Max resolution over eDP	[email protected]	[email protected]
Max resolution over HDMI 1. 4	[email protected]	[email protected]
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Package Size	42mm x 28mm	37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported	FCBGA1440	FCLGA1151
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	95 Watt
Thermal Solution		PCG 2015D (130W)
Max number of PCIe lanes	16	16
PCI Express revision	3. 0	3.0
PCIe configurations	Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4	Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
Scalability		1S Only
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX)
Intel® OS Guard
Intel® Secure Key technology
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Secure Boot
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Idle States
Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Intel 64
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® My WiFi technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost
Intel® TSX-NI
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Speed Shift technology
Thermal Monitoring
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Intel Core i9-8950HK vs.

Intel Core i7-8700K

Intel Core i9-8950HK

The Intel Core i9-8950HK operates with 6 cores and 12 CPU threads. It run at 4.80 GHz base 3.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1440 CPU socket. This version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Coffee Lake H Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2018

Intel Core i7-8700K

The Intel Core i7-8700K operates with 6 cores and 12 CPU threads. It run at 4.70 GHz base 4.30 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 95 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1151-2 CPU socket. This version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Coffee Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q4/2017

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i7-8700K

Compare Detail

2.90 GHz	Frequency	3.70 GHz
6	Cores	6
4.80 GHz	Turbo (1 Core)	4.70 GHz
3.80 GHz	Turbo (All Cores)	4.30 GHz
Yes	Hyperthreading	Yes
Yes	Overclocking	Yes
normal	Core Architecture	normal
Intel UHD Graphics 630	GPU	Intel UHD Graphics 630
1.15 GHz	GPU (Turbo)	1.20 GHz
14 nm	Technology	14 nm
1.15 GHz	GPU (Turbo)	1.20 GHz
12	DirectX Version	12
3	Max. displays	3
DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM	Memory	DDR4-2666
2	Memory channels	2
	Max memory
No	ECC	No
—	L2 Cache	—
12. 00 MB	L3 Cache	12.00 MB
3.0	PCIe version	3.0
16	PCIe lanes	16
14 nm	Technology	14 nm
BGA 1440	Socket	LGA 1151-2
65 W	TDP	95 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d	Virtualization	VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q1/2018	Release date	Q4/2017
Show more data		Show more data

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Intel Core i9-8950HK		Intel Core i7-8700K
65 W	Max TDP	95 W
NA	Power consumption per day (kWh)	NA
NA	Running cost per day	NA
NA	Power consumption per year (kWh)	NA
NA	Running cost per year	NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

Intel Core i9-8950HK Benchmarks — Geekbench Browser

Intel Core i9-9900KS 4. 0 GHz (8 cores)	9103
Intel Core i9-9900KF 3.6 GHz (8 cores)	8562
Intel Core i9-9900K 3.6 GHz (8 cores)	8484
Intel Core i9-9900 3.1 GHz (8 cores)	7593
Intel Xeon E-2288G 3.7 GHz (8 cores)	7237
Intel Core i7-9700K 3.6 GHz (8 cores)	7172
Intel Core i7-9700KF 3.6 GHz (8 cores)	7110
Intel Core i7-8086K 4.0 GHz (6 cores)	7003
Intel Core i7-8700K 3.7 GHz (6 cores)	6482
Intel Core i7-9700F 3.0 GHz (8 cores)	6437
Intel Core i7-9700 3.0 GHz (8 cores)	6351
Intel Xeon E-2136 3. 3 GHz (6 cores)	5911
Intel Xeon E-2146G 3.5 GHz (6 cores)	5837
Intel Core i7-8700 3.2 GHz (6 cores)	5781
Intel Core i7-8700B 3.2 GHz (6 cores)	5705
Intel Core i5-9600KF 3.7 GHz (6 cores)	5618
Intel Core i5-9600K 3.7 GHz (6 cores)	5526
Intel Core i5-8600K 3.6 GHz (6 cores)	5431
Intel Xeon E-2276M 2.8 GHz (6 cores)	5124
Intel Core i7-9700T 2.0 GHz (8 cores)	5099
Intel Core i5-9600 3.1 GHz (6 cores)	4997
Intel Core i7-9850H 2.6 GHz (6 cores)	4883
Intel Core i5-8600 3. 1 GHz (6 cores)	4833
Intel Core i7-9750H 2.6 GHz (6 cores)	4831
Intel Core i9-8950HK 2.9 GHz (6 cores)	4828
Intel Core i7-8700T 2.4 GHz (6 cores)	4762
Intel Core i5-8500B 3.0 GHz (6 cores)	4673
Intel Core i5-9500 3.0 GHz (6 cores)	4592
Intel Core i5-8500 3.0 GHz (6 cores)	4580
Intel Core i5-9400F 2.9 GHz (6 cores)	4556
Intel Xeon E-2176M 2.7 GHz (6 cores)	4504
Intel Core i5-8400 2.8 GHz (6 cores)	4495
Intel Core i5-9400 2.9 GHz (6 cores)	4494
Intel Core i7-8750H 2. 2 GHz (6 cores)	4438
Intel Core i7-8850H 2.6 GHz (6 cores)	4372
Intel Core i3-9350KF 4.0 GHz (4 cores)	4064
Intel Core i5-9500T 2.2 GHz (6 cores)	4026
Intel Core i7-8559U 2.7 GHz (4 cores)	3989
Intel Core i7-8569U 2.8 GHz (4 cores)	3979
Intel Core i3-8350K 4.0 GHz (4 cores)	3856
Intel Core i5-8500T 2.1 GHz (6 cores)	3841
Intel Core i5-8400T 1.7 GHz (6 cores)	3734
Intel Core i5-8259U 2.3 GHz (4 cores)	3702
Intel Core i5-8279U 2.4 GHz (4 cores)	3590
Intel Core i5-8257U 1. 4 GHz (4 cores)	3576
Intel Core i5-9300HF 2.4 GHz (4 cores)	3476
Intel Core i7-8557U 1.7 GHz (4 cores)	3455
Intel Core i5-8400H 2.5 GHz (4 cores)	3404
Intel Core i5-9300H 2.4 GHz (4 cores)	3299
Intel Core i3-9100 3.6 GHz (4 cores)	3282
Intel Core i5-8300H 2.3 GHz (4 cores)	3263
Intel Core i3-9100F 3.6 GHz (4 cores)	3248
Intel Core i3-8100 3.6 GHz (4 cores)	3027
Intel Core i3-8300 3.7 GHz (4 cores)	3023
Intel Core i3-9100T 3.1 GHz (4 cores)	2832
Intel Core i3-8100T 3. 1 GHz (4 cores)	2672
Intel Pentium Gold G5400 3.7 GHz (2 cores)	2067
Intel Core i3-8109U 3.0 GHz (2 cores)	2029
Intel Pentium Gold G5500 3.8 GHz (2 cores)	1941
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz (2 cores)	1336

Intel Core i7-9750H vs Intel Core i9-8950HK: What is the difference?

59points

Intel Core i7-9750H

60points

Intel Core i9-8950HK

64 facts in comparison

Intel Core i7-9750H

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Why is Intel Core i7-9750H better than Intel Core i9-8950HK?

64GB larger maximum memory amount?
128GBvs64GB
110.92seconds faster Blender (classroom) result?
1076. 37secondsvs1187.29seconds

Why is Intel Core i9-8950HK better than Intel Core i7-9750H?

11.54% faster CPU speed?
6 x 2.9GHzvs6 x 2.6GHz
0.3GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.8GHzvs4.5GHz
3 higher clock multiplier?
29vs26

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Intel Core i7-9750H

Intel Core i5-11400H

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Apple M1

Intel Core i7-9750H

Intel Core i5-1135G7

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i3-12100F

Intel Core i7-9750H

Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i7-12800H

Intel Core i7-9750H

Apple M1

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i5-1135G7

Intel Core i7-9750H

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i7-8850H

Intel Core i7-9750H

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

Intel Core i9-8950HK

AMD Ryzen 7 2800H

Intel Core i7-9750H

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Celeron N4000

Intel Core i7-9750H

Intel Core i7-1165G7

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i3-5010U

Intel Core i7-9750H

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i9-9880H

Intel Core i7-9750H

Intel Core i5-11300H

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Intel Core i7-9750H

3 User reviews

Intel Core i7-9750H

8. 0/10

3 User reviews

Intel Core i9-8950HK

0 User reviews

Intel Core i9-8950HK

0.0/10

0 User reviews

Features

Value for money

6.7/10

3 votes

No reviews yet

Gaming

9.3/10

3 votes

No reviews yet

Performance

8.3/10

3 votes

No reviews yet

Reliability

7.7/10

3 votes

No reviews yet

Energy efficiency

5.7/10

3 votes

No reviews yet

Performance

1.CPU speed

6 x 2.6GHz

6 x 2.9GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2. CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

4.5GHz

4.8GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✖Intel Core i7-9750H

✖Intel Core i9-8950HK

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

0. 25MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2666MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

41.8GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖Intel Core i7-9750H

✖Intel Core i9-8950HK

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-9750H)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-8950HK)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-9750H)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-8950HK)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-8950HK)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-8950HK)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

334.84seconds

347.62seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

1076.37seconds

1187.29seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-8950HK)

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔Intel Core i7-9750H

✔Intel Core i9-8950HK

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔Intel Core i7-9750H

✔Intel Core i9-8950HK

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔Intel Core i7-9750H

✔Intel Core i9-8950HK

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4. SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔Intel Core i7-9750H

✔Intel Core i9-8950HK

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-9750H)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-8950HK)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔Intel Core i7-9750H

✔Intel Core i9-8950HK

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i7-9750H

✖Intel Core i9-8950HK

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-9750H)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-8950HK)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Core i9 8950HK vs i7 8700K:

performance comparison

Intel Core i9 8950HK

Intel Core i7 8700K

Which is better: laptop Intel Core i9 8950HK at 2.9 GHz or desktop i7 8700K at 3.7 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 6-core processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

Overview
Differences
Performance
Features
Comments

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single -flow performance

Rating in tests using one nucleus

Core i9 8950HK

Core i7 8700k

Multi -flow performance

Tests in benchmarks where all nucleus

Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core I98950HK

Core i7 8700k

Energy Equality

Energy Effects Chip

Core I9 8950HK

Core I7 8700k

CIRETICARY

RIGH 8950HK

Core i7 8700K

Key differences

What are the main differences between 8700K and 8950HK

Reasons to choose Intel Core i9 8950HK

53% lower than Core i7 8700K peak power consumption — 45 vs 95 Watts
Appeared 6 months later than rival
4. 7 GHz)

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 8700K

Supports up to 128GB DDR4-2666
16% faster in single core Geekbench v5 — 1242 and 1071 points

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single core)

Core i9 8950HK

1197

Core i7 8700K
+2%

1219

Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

Core i9 8950HK

7008

Core i7 8700K
+27%

8881

Passmark CPU (single core)

Core i9 8950HK

2507

Core i7 8700K
+11%

2781

Passmark CPU (multi-core)

Core i9 8950HK

10854

Core i7 8700K
+28%

13898

Geekbench 5 (single core)

Core i9 8950HK

1077

Core i7 8700K
+16%

1251

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Core i9 8950HK

5312

Core i7 8700K
+26%

6690

▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

Specifications

List of full specifications of Intel Core i9 8950HK and i7 8700K

General information

Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Release date	April 3, 2018	October 5, 2017
Type	For laptop	Desktop
Instruction set architecture	x86-64	x86-64
Codename	Coffee Lake	Coffee Lake
Model number	i9-8950HK	i7-8700K
Socket	BGA-1440	LGA-1151
Integrated graphics	UHD Graphics 630	UHD Graphics 630

Performance

Cores	6	6
Number of threads	12	12
Frequency	2. 9 GHz	3.7 GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost	4.8 GHz	4.7 GHz
Bus frequency	—	100 MHz
Multiplier	37x	37x
Tire speed	8 GT/s	8 GT/s
Level 1 cache	64KB (per core)	64KB (per core)
Level 2 cache	256KB (per core)	256KB (per core)
Level 3 cache	12MB (shared)	12MB (shared)
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	Yes

Energy consumption

Process technology	14 nanometers	14 nanometers
Power consumption (TDP)	45 W	95W
Critical temperature	100°C	100°C

Integrated graphics	Intel UHD Graphics 630	Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU frequency	350 MHz	350 MHz
Boost GPU frequency	1200 MHz	1200 MHz
Shader blocks	192	192
TMUs	24	24
ROPs	3	3
Computer units	24	24
TGP	15W	15W
Max. resolution	4096×2304 — 60Hz	4096×2304 — 60Hz

Igpu Flops

Core i9 8950HK

0.38 Teraflops

Core i7 8700K

0.38 Teraflops

Memory Support

0182	DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133	DDR4-2666
Max. size	64 GB	128 GB
Number of channels	2	2
Max. bandwidth	41.8 GB/s	41.6 GB/s
ECC support	No	No

Other

Official site	Site Intel Core i9 8950HK	Site Intel Core i7 8700K
PCI Express Version	3.0	3.0
Max. PCI Express lanes	16	16
Extended instructions	SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2	SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Poll

What processor do you think is the best?

Core i9 8950HK

0 (0%)

Core i7 8700K

1 (100%)

Total votes: 1

Competitors

1.
Intel Core i7 8700K vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

2.
Intel Core i7 8700K vs i

3.
Intel Core i7 8700K vs i7 12700K

4.
Intel Core i7 8700K vs i5 12600K

5.
Intel Core i7 8700K vs i5 12400F

What will you choose: Intel Core i7 8700K or i9 8950HK?

Name

Message

Intel Core i9-8950HK vs Intel Core i7-8700K — VsRank

Benefits
General information
Specifications
RAM Integrated video core Advanced technologies
Cinebench benchmarks Geekbench benchmarks Other tests

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i9-8950HK lost!

Number of points: 10159

Intel Core i7-8700K

Intel Core i7-8700K won!

Points: 11707

9058
50 W less power consumption
+800 MHz CPU clock advantage
+500 KB L2 cache advantage
+64 GB RAM advantage
Supports multithreading

Information about the series and architecture of the Intel Core i9-8950HK and Intel Core i7-8700K, as well as the release date of the processors.

Core i9

Core i7 (Desktop)

Coffee Lake

Coffee Lake-S

Intel Core

-87-8700k0589 2018-04-02

2017-10-05

3.0

Main technical specifications of Intel Core i9-8950HK and Intel Core0K i7-870 processors.

Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (64)

Leader — AMD Epyc 7702 (128)

2900MHz

3700MHz

Leader — Intel Core i7-10810U 4900 MHz

4800 MHz

4700 MHz

Leader — Intel Core i9-10980HK (5300)

1.5MB

2MB

Leader — AMD Epyc 7702P (32)

12MB

Leader — AMD Epyc 7742
256 MB

45W

95W

Leader — AMD Epyc 7h22 (280)

14 nm

Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (7)

Information about the type and support of the maximum amount of RAM, as well as the maximum frequency and number of channels.

64GB

128GB

Leader — AMD Epyc 7282 (4000)

2666 MHz

Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS (4266)

Leader — AMD Epyc 7351P (8)

DDR4

Integrated GPU specifications. Support for 4K, clock speed, as well as the amount of video core memory.

UHD Graphics 630

300 MHz

350 MHz

Leader — Intel Core i7-8706G (931)

1.15GHz

1.2GHz

Leader — AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 2 MHz

64GB

Leader — Intel Xeon E-2176G (128)

4096×2304@30Hz

4096×2304@24Hz

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i7-8700K

12_1

4. 4

4.5

Processor support for modern technologies such as multi-threading, Turbo mode, AES encryption algorithm, and x86 AVX command set extension.

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i7-8700K

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i7-8700K

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i7-8700K

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i7-8700K

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i7-8700K

The Cinebench benchmark is a well-known and free test of computer performance (processor and video card). The program was developed on the basis of MAXON Cinema 4D — a professional application for creating 3D animation.

2651.5

No data

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (8857)

442.5

No data

Leader — AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (514)

1191. 5

1359

Leader — Intel Core i7-6700K (8800)

195

192

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (216)

13.22

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (41)

2.24

2.2

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (2)

36591

39096

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (61667)

7149

7328

Leader — Intel Core i5-8500 (8606)

Geekbench is a synthetic computer performance test. The program performs a series of test tasks that simulate real scenarios that a computer encounters in everyday work.

24399.5

25045

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (55569)

5665.5

5783

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (6308)

No data

23208.5

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (35932)

No data

5754

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (6313)

23881

No data

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (80967)

4567

No data

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (4875)

A range of different benchmarks, including 3DMark06 CPU, SuperPI, Octane and many other benchmarks.

11055

11701

Leader — AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (106435)

8.41

8.02

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (7)

466.44

442.8

Leader — Intel Core i9-10980XE (410)

8.08

4.16

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (2)

245.42

118.9

Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (38)

6420. 5

7120

Leader — Intel Core i7-6950X (8450)

224.91

232

Leader — Intel Core i9-9900KS (279)

77.92

87.2

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (167)

8.84

10.8

Leader — Intel Core i9-10980XE (27)

7.2

Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (20)

1.2

1. 4

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (3)

0.74

0.79

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (2)

410.84

332.75

Leader — AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (111)

5080

No data

Leader — Intel Core i5-1035G1 (9643)

3034

No data

Leader — Intel Core i9-9980XE (

)

224.91

232

Leader — Intel Core i7-7740X (50)

40726

47063. 5

Leader — Intel Core i7-7740X (48268)

115

No data

Leader — Intel Core i9-9880H (134)

Intel Core i9-8950HK vs. Intel Core i7-8700K

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i9-8950HK runs with 6 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 4.80 GHz base 3.80 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W . BGA 1440 CPU socket This version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Coffee Lake H architecture has been advanced over 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q1/2018

Intel Core i7-8700K

Intel Core i7-8700K runs with 6 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 4. 70 GHz base 4.30 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 95 W .The processor connects to LGA 1151- CPU socket 2 This version includes 12.00 MB L3 cache per die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Coffee Lake S architecture has been advanced over 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q4/2017

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i7-8700K

Frequency 3.70 GHz 6 Cores 6 4.80GHz Turbo (1 core) 4.70 GHz 3.80GHz Turbo (all cores) 4.30 GHz Yes Hyper Threading Yes Yes Acceleration Yes normal Basic architecture normal

Intel UHD Graphics 630

GPU

Intel UHD Graphics 630

1. 15GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.20 GHz 14nm Technology 14nm 1.15GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.20 GHz 12 DirectX Version 12 3 Max. displays 3 DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM memory capacity DDR4-2666 2 Memory channels 2 Maximum memory No. ECC No. — L2 Cache — 12.00MB L3 Cache 12.00MB 3.0 PCIe version 3.0 16 PCIe lanes 16 14nm Technology 14nm BGA 1440 Connector LGA 1151-2 65 W TDP 95W VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Q1/2018 Release date Q4/2017

Show more details

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform test that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Intel Core i9-8950HK		Intel Core i7-8700K
65 W	Max TDP	95W
NA	Power consumption per day (kWh)	NA
NA	Operating cost per day	NA
NA	Power consumption per year (kWh)	NA
NA	Operating cost per year	NA

Popular comparison

Comments-8950HK

Core i7-8700 vs Core i9-8950HK — Th200

Contents

Introduction
Features
Tests
Key differences
Conclusion
Comments

Processor

Introduction

We compared two processors: Intel Core i7-8700 vs. Intel Core i9-8950HK. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.

Intel Core i7-8700 is a Core i7 (Coffee Lake) generation desktop processor released Jan 1st, 2018. It has 6 cores and 12 threads. Operates at a frequency of 3200 MHz and consumes up to 65 watts.

Intel Core i9-8950HK is a Core i9 (Coffee Lake-H) generation mobile processor released on Apr 2nd, 2018. It has 6 cores and 12 threads. Operates at a frequency of 2900 MHz and consumes up to 95 watts.

Characteristics

Generation

Core i7 (Coffee Lake)

Core i9 (Coffee Lake-H)

Date of exit

Jan 1st, 2018

APR 2ND, 2018

Tue

Frequency

3200 MHz

2900 MHz

Turbbo Frequency

4600 MHz

4700 MHz

Nuclei

Flowers

cache L1

64K (Per Core)

CASH L2

256K (Per Core)

built -in

n/ n/ n/ n/ n/ a A

UHD 630

Memory Support

DDR4-2666 MHZ Dual-channel

DDR4

ECC memory

PCI-Express

GEN 3, 16 LANES

AES-NI, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, Boost 2. 0, CLMUL, EIST, F16C, FMA3, HTT, Intel 64, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.2, SSSE3, TSX, TXT, VT- d, VT-x, XD bit

AES-NI, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, Boost 2.0, CLMUL, EIST, F16C, FMA3, HTT, Intel 64, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.2, SSSE3, TSX, TXT, VT- d, VT-x, XD bit

Benchmarks

3DMark Physics

3DMark is a benchmarking tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.

Intel Core i7-8700
+27%

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Blender bmw27

Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.

Intel Core i7-8700
+30%

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Geekbench 5 Multi-thread

GeekBench is a cross-platform benchmarking utility that runs a series of benchmarks that simulate real-life tasks. There are two versions of the program. This is a multi-threaded version, i.e. all cores are used, making it suitable for evaluating server performance.

Intel Core i7-8700
+22%

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Geekbench 5 Single-thread

GeekBench is a cross-platform benchmarking utility that runs a series of benchmarks that simulate real-life tasks. There are two versions of the program. This is a single threaded version. Most applications (MS Word, web browsers, games) rarely use more than one thread at a time, making it suitable for performance evaluation in everyday tasks.

Intel Core i7-8700
+9%

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Key differences

Why is Intel Core i7-8700 better than Intel Core i9-8950HK?

Consumes 32% less power — 65W vs 95W

Has 11% higher frequency — 3200MHz vs 2900MHz

Why is Intel Core i9-8950HK better than Intel Core i7-8700?

Newer — 3 months later release

Has a 3% higher Turbo Boost frequency — 4700 MHz vs. 4600 MHz

Conclusion

The Core i7-8700 delivers 12% better performance, uses up to 32% less energy and has 300 MHz higher frequency. According to our research, the Core i7-8700 3990X is more powerful than the Core i9-8950HK. Even though the Core i7-8700 is the winner in this comparison, it’s worth paying attention to the Core i7-8700 vs. Core i7-8700K comparison. The Core i7-8700K is the same generation processor but more powerful. 9Ol0000003

Mobile single threaded performance

Mobile multithreaded performance

Intel Core i7-8700K vs Intel Core i9-9900K: What is the difference?

59 BALLLA

Intel Core i7-8700k

67 Ballla

Intel Core i9-9900k

64 Facts compared to

Intel i7-8700K

INTEL CORE I9-9002 Is 8700K better than Intel Core i9-9900K?

41.74% cheaper?
339. 97 € vs 583.53 €

29.73% higher CPU speed?
8 x 3.6GHz vs 6 x 3.7GHz
4 more CPU threads?
16 vs 12
0.5MB more L2 cache?
2MB vs 1.5MB
16.15% higher PassMark score?
18898 vs 16270
0.3GHz higher turbo clock speed?
5GHz vs 4.7GHz
4MB more L3 cache?
16MB vs 12MB
128KB more L1 cache?
512KB vs 384KB
9.46% higher PassMark score (single)?
2986 vs 2728

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Intel Core i7-8700K

Intel Core i5-12400

Intel Core i9-9900k

Apple M1 Pro (10-Core)

Intel Core i7-8700k

AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

Intel Core i99900k

VS 9000. 9 3900x

Intel Core i7-8700k

AMD Ryzen 5 5500u

Intel Core i9-9900k

Intel Core I9-9900

Intel Core I7-8700K 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS -9700K

Intel Core i9-900k

Intel Core i5-12600K

Intel Core i7-8700K

AMD Ryzen 5 5600g

Intel Core I9-9900K

I7-97003

Intel Core. 0002 Intel Core I7-0002 I7-0002 Intel Core I7-0002 I7-0002 I7-0002 I7-0002 I7-0002 I7-0002 I7-0002 I7-0002 I7-0002 I7-0002 -8700K

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i9-9900k

AMD Ryzen 7 5800x

Intel Core i7-8700k

Intel Core Core Core Core Core CORE CORE CORE CORE CORE I5-9600C 9900K

Intel Core i7-10700K

Intel Core i7-8700k

AMD Ryzen 7 3700x

Intel Core i9-9900k

AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

I7-000 I7-000 I7-000 I7-000 INTEL CORE I7- vs

Apple M1 Max

Intel Core i9-9900k

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i7-8700K

Apple M1

.000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9 5900x

Comparison of prices

cheaper

Users reviews

General rating

Intel Core i7-8700k

1 Reviews of users

I7-8700K 9000 9000 1 10,000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 Core i9-9900K

4 User reviews

Intel Core i9-9900K

8. 8 /10

4 User reviews

Features

Value for money

10.0 /10

1 Votes

8.5 /10

4 Votes

Games

10.0 /10

1 Votes

/10 9000.000

10.0 /10

1 votes

9.5 /10

4 Votes

Reliability

10.0 /10

1 VOTES

9.0 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /100002 4 Votes

Energy efficiency

10.0 /10

1 Votes

8.8 /10

4 Votes

Productivity

1. Operation of the central processor

6 x 3.7GHZ

9000

The speed of the central processor shows how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, taking into account all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

4.7GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Has unlocked multiplier

✔Intel Core i7-8700K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

2MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2666MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

42.7GB/s

41.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4 memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.Maximum memory

Maximum memory (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7. Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖Intel Core i7-8700K

✖Intel Core i9-9900K

Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9. bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

164.2seconds

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

544seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1.uses multithreading

✔Intel Core i7-8700K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔Intel Core i7-8700K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔Intel Core i7-8700K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔Intel Core i7-8700K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6 bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔Intel Core i7-8700K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i7-8700K

✖Intel Core i9-9900K

The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

«Mutants» or «glue» processors for socket 1151: list, characteristics, features

9Ol000

5 Where to buy

6 Related links

“Mutants” or “gluing” processors appeared massively in the summer of 2020. Initially, such models were intended to work in laptops, but were redone by the hardworking Chinese for the desktop socket 1151 v1 \ v2.

These «reworks» are not new. Previously, there were already quite interesting Crystal Well processors converted for socket 1150. This time, mobile BGA1440 CPUs based on the Skylake, Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake and even Comet Lake architectures became the donor.

The installation of such models in the LGA1151 was made possible thanks to a special adapter board and a plate that replaces the socket frame. The process of installing «mutants» is more complicated than that of conventional desktop processors (this will be discussed below), but this did not stop the popularity of «gluings». Which is not surprising, because in terms of price / performance ratio, some models can be many times superior to their desktop counterparts.

UPD : in the fall of 2021, «mutants» with a distribution cover and a new substrate began to appear. The main advantages over previous versions are: easier installation in a socket (not much different from installing a regular desktop processor) and significantly improved memory handling at higher frequencies (maybe not on all CPU models).

Characteristics of famous models Some of the information is obtained from the owners, some is taken from open sources and does not claim to be 100% accurate.

If you have any add-ons or information about models not included in this list, please let us know.

QPH7 / QHR7 $35 — $45 — \ — Sky Lake, 14 nm Q0 4 \ 8 1600 MHz 2600 MHz 8 mb 35 W Locked. Maximum multiplier for all cores: 24. On Z170 boards, bus overclocking is available. HD Graphics 530 ~3.3 — 3.5 GHz QHPW $35 — $45 — \ i7-6700

— \ i7-6700

0182

Q0 4 \ 8 2200 MHz 3000 MHz 8 mb 45 W Maximum multiplier for all cores: 28. On Z170 boards, bus overclocking is available. HD Graphics 530 ~3.6 — 4.0 QL3X $50 — $70 Core I7 7820hk \ Core I7 7700K Kaby Lake, 14 nm 0 4 \ 8 2400 MHz 3500 MHz UHD Graphics 630 ? QTJ2 $80 — $100 Core i7 10750H \ Core i5 10400 Comet Lake, 14 nm R0 6 \ 12 2400 MHz 4300 MHz 12 mb 45 W Locked. Max All Core Multiplier: 40 UHD Graphics 630 4.0 GHz QTJ1 $120 — $140

9 UHD Graphics 630 3.9 SRCX2 Core i7-8700B $110 — $140 Core i7-8700 Coffee Lake, 14 nm U0 6 \ 12 3200 MHz 4600 MHz 12 mb 65 W Blocked. Max All Core Multiplier: 42 UHD Graphics 630 4.2GHz SRF6X 0182 SRFCP Core i7-9750H $130 — $160 — Coffee Lake, 14 nm R0 6 \ 12 2600 MHz 4500 MHz 12 mb 45 W Blocked. Maximum multiplier for all nuclei: 40 UHD Graphics 630 4.0 GHC SR32K XEON E3 1505M V6

$ 60 — $ 70 —

—

0182

UHD Graphics P630 4. 2 SRFCK Xeon E-2276M $90 — $110 — Coffee Lake, 14 nm R0 6 \ 12 2800 MHz 4700 MHz 12 mb 45 W Blocked. Max All Core Multiplier: 41 UHD Graphics P630 4.1 GHz SRCKQ Xeon-E 2186M $85 — $110 45 W Locked. Maximum multiplier for all cores: 41 UHD Graphics 630 4.1 GHz

Compatibility with motherboards

Compatibility table with motherboards

on all types of 100, 200 and 300 series chipsets. Owners of motherboards from MSI are much less fortunate, only processors based on Sky Lake and Kaby Lake architectures can work on them.

Exception: Sky Lake QPH7/QHR7 mutants will only work on boards with 100 series chipsets.

It should be borne in mind that the «300 series» refers to only 3 chipsets — Z370, B365 and h410C, at least work is not guaranteed on boards with the B360, h410, h470, Q370 and Z390 chipsets.

However, compatibility alone is not enough. In order for the system to work with converted mobile CPUs, you will have to flash the modified BIOS. Owners of boards from Gigabyte and MSI are more fortunate, you can flash boards from these manufacturers from a flash drive. But for flashing boards from Asus, Biostar and other manufacturers, you cannot do without a programmer.

There are several ways to get a bios mod for your motherboard:

Many sellers offer to assemble a bios mod for a specific board when you buy a processor from them
You can assemble the BIOS yourself according to the instructions
Finally, you can ask the community for help. Mod bios already exist for most popular board models.

Nuances and features

Features of «glues» indicated by the seller on aliexpress

Both serial and engineering versions of processors are being redesigned. The first wave of mutants was represented exclusively by engineers. The cost of the final models, as a rule, is higher.
There are both models without distribution cover and models with a custom cover. The process of installing a stone in a socket for such models can be quite different.
Engineer processors with an unlocked multiplier can be overclocked on any supported boards, regardless of the chipset. This feature is available primarily because these stones were intended for laptops and do not have built-in restrictions that Intel is introducing into desktop models. For some boards, overclocking may be available through bios, for others, using the Intel XTU utility or ThrottleStop. It is also worth remembering that overclocking on boards that were not originally designed for such loads is not a good idea.
Almost all models have a working video core, which can also be overclocked.
Most models have a fairly modest stock TDP of 35-45W, but in reality it can be much higher, especially for models with an unlocked multiplier. For example, a well-overclocked QQLS can easily consume up to 250-300W under heavy loads and will require appropriate cooling.
All splices are characterized by memory overclocking problems. In some cases, it is possible to force the memory to operate at a frequency of ~ 3000+ MHz, but as a rule, the limit will be 2400-2600 MHz. It is believed that memory on Micron chips is running worse than Samsung or Hynix. It is also known that Coffee Lake models tend to take a slightly higher RAM frequency than Kaby Lake or Sky Lake. You can further improve performance by adjusting the timings. UPD: Apparently, the processors on the new version of the substrate work with memory much better than the earlier versions. Read reviews of specific models carefully before buying!
There are models in which the ram frequency is limited by the memory controller (for example, for existing Xeon mutants it is 2666 MHz).
Due to the nature of the design, special care must be taken when installing the processor in the socket and then installing the cooling.
For models without a cover, it is desirable to choose a cooling system with a smooth copper or nickel-plated surface that completely covers the crystal. The best mounting method is spring-loaded screws. For a good overclocking of 6 and 8 nuclear models, you should take care of high-quality thermal paste, many enthusiasts use liquid metal for high frequencies.

Correct socket installation (for models without distribution cover)

First of all, make sure that the modified BIOS is flashed successfully. It is also advisable to perform a “bios reset” by pressing the corresponding button or closing the corresponding jumper on the board.
We insert the processor into the socket, press it with your finger so that it “sits” into the socket, we control it visually so that there are no distortions.
We put a new processor frame on top, we catch the moment when the frame pins enter the substrate hole.
We screw in the supplied 3 screws so that they screw in exactly to the free length, but do NOT yet press the frame to the board.
Tighten each screw exactly one and a half turns.
Apply thermal paste and install the cooler carefully. It is not necessary to fix it yet, now we just have to check if the system will start.
Includes board with 1 memory module. The first start usually takes about 1 minute (maximum up to 2 minutes), during which the board itself will reboot several times — this is normal, just wait. If the board has LEDs or a postcode indicator, great, this will add information content.
If the board did not start after 2-3 power-up cycles, we tighten each screw of the socket frame exactly a quarter of a turn. As a rule, everything comes out either the first time or the second time.
After a successful start, you can install the rest of the memory modules, then check that the board sees all the installed RAM and pci-e devices. «Glues» are sensitive to pressure and the slightest distortion can lead to the dumping of memory channels or pci-e lines.
If everything went well, move on to the cooling fixture.

I9 8950hk vs i7 8700k: Intel Core i7-8700K vs i9-8950HK

Intel Core i9 8950HK vs i7 8700K: performance comparison

Review

Key Differences

Benchmarks

Specifications

General

Performance

Memory support

Cast your vote

ompetitors

Intel Core i7-8700K vs Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i7-8700K vs Intel Core i9-8950HK

Specifications:

Performances :

Equivalence:

See also:

Intel Core i9-8950HK vs Intel Core i7-8700K

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i9-8950HK

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-8700K

Compare benchmarks

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Core i9-8950HK vs.

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i7-8700K

Compare Detail

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Popular Comparision

Comments

Intel Core i9-8950HK Benchmarks — Geekbench Browser

Intel Core i7-9750H vs Intel Core i9-8950HK: What is the difference?

Why is Intel Core i7-9750H better than Intel Core i9-8950HK?

Why is Intel Core i9-8950HK better than Intel Core i7-9750H?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Features

Performance

Memory

Benchmarks

Features

Price comparison

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Core i9 8950HK vs i7 8700K:

Overview

Key differences

Benchmark tests

Specifications

General information

Performance

Energy consumption

Memory Support

Other

Poll

Competitors

Intel Core i9-8950HK vs Intel Core i7-8700K — VsRank

Intel Core i9-8950HK vs. Intel Core i7-8700K

Intel Core i9-8950HK

Intel Core i7-8700K

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)