What’s the Difference and Which Is Better?
There are a variety of SSD brands in the market so that lots of people are tangled in choosing which one. Among them, Intel 660p vs 970 EVO are heatedly discussed. Are you also confused about their differences? Let’s explore this question together with MiniTool.
When you search for Intel 660p vs 970 EVO SSD on Google, you may find various answers on many forums and communities. There is no doubt that Samsung 970 EVO SSD has excellent data transfer speed, while some people are confused about its real performance and want to choose Intel 660p SSD.
Here’s a true example from Reddit community:
Intel 660p vs 970 EVO which one should I choose? Right now, 660p is around $200 and 970 is $120. But Intel offers 4 times space. I’m aware 970 is generally faster but how noticeable is that difference in real-world use cases? Is it worth it to grab the 660p for that price or should I stick with 970? https://www.reddit.com/r/buildapc/comments/bectih/intel_660p_2tb_vs_samsung_970_evo_plus_500gb/
About Intel 660p SSD
The Intel 660p SSD is one of the most famous products from Intel. This SSD was designed with the Quad-Level Cell NAND flash that stores 4 bits of information per cell. Due to its impressive power efficiency and large capacity, this Intel SSD has attracted a great many people.
—image from Amazon
The Intel 660p SSDs come with the M.2 form factor and PCIe 4.0 NVMe interface. With an affordable price, the Intel 660p SSD is sold at about $0.2 per GB. Its sequential read and write speed can rate up to 1800 MB/s. This SSD also boasts fast random read and write speed (150,000 IOPS/220,000 IOPS).
It uses 256-Bit AES hardware encryption to secure data and provides a 5-year warranty. In addition, the Intel 660p NVMe SSD also supports both the static DRAM and SLC caches. To give you an intuitive understanding, here we summarize its pros and cons as follows:
Pros:
- NVMe M.2 SSD with high capacity
- Impressive power efficiency
- Low price point
- High random read and write speed
- SSD Toolbox
Cons:
- Relatively low write endurance
About Samsung 970 EVO SSD
Samsung 907 EVO Plus is a commonly accepted high-performance NVMe M.
2 SSD. It is one of the fastest M.2 SSDs around the SSDs. This SSD is a perfect choice for those who want to enjoy the experience of high power efficiency, data security, and fast data transferring.
—image from samsung.com
With the sustainable performance, the Samsung 970 EVO Plus boasts 3500MB/s sequential read speed and 3300MB/s sequential write speed. This SSD also provides strong write endurance powered by the latest V-NAND technology.
Moreover, the 970 EVO achieves unparalleled reliability. Its advanced controller and heat spreader create excellent heat dissipation. Its dynamic thermal guard can automatically monitor temperatures，which can help sustain an optimal operating temperature.
Here are the pros and cons of a Samsung 970 EVO:
Pros:
- Fastest sequential read and write speed
- Advanced V-NAND technology provides high power efficiency
- Extremely endurable
- Unparalleled reliability
Cons:
- Fairly expensive
Right now, you may have an overall understanding of the Intel 660p and Samsung 970 EVO.
Both of the 2 SSDs have their own advantages and disadvantages so that lots of people are tangled in choosing one. Intel 660p vs Samsung 970 EVO, which is better? The following part will analyze this question from different aspects.
Intel 660p VS 970 EVO SSD
Is Intel 660p better than 970 EVO? This part mainly focuses on Intel 660p vs Samsung 970 EVO SSD. To help you make an easier choice, here we will compare them from the 5 main aspects. They are disk performance, capacity/cache memory, power consumption, reliability, and cache memory.
# 1. Real Performance
Disk performance should be the first and foremost factor for most people when purchasing an SSD. The 660p vs 970 EVO, which has better performance? As mentioned above, the Intel 660p SSD can rate up to 1800 MB/s sequential read and write speed, while Samsung 970 EVO SSD can rate up to 3500MB/s sequential read speed and 3300MB/s sequential write speed.
So, there is no doubt that Samsung 970 EVO has faster data speed than the Intel 660p.
As the example mentioned above, however, some people are still confused about their performance in real-world use.
Do you want to know the real disk performance of the 2 SSD? With the help of MiniTool Partition Wizard, you can get a disk benchmark with ease. It is a professional disk management tool trusted by millions of users around the world.
You can use it to migrate OS to SSD, convert MBR to GPT, and resize partition, etc. This powerful software has helped users compare many storage devices’ speed such as Micro SD card U1 vs U3, SanDisk Extreme vs Extreme Pro, mSATA vs M.2, and so forth.
Click on the button below to download this program and follow the on-screen prompts to install it on your computer.
Free Download
Now, let’s see how to measure your SSD performance with MiniTool Partition Wizard.
Step 1. Launch this program to enter its main interface, and then click on the Disk Benchmark feature on the top toolbar.
Step 2. Select the drive letter of your SSD from the drop-down menu, and then you can further specify the test parameters like Transfer Size, Transfer Length, and Test Mode. After you have set these parameters, click on the Start button.
Step 3. This program will test your SSD performance at once. After several seconds, you will see the real data speed including sequential/random read and write speed.
# 2. Capacity
For those who want to have a large capacity but with less money, perhaps the Intel 660p SSD is more suitable. If you choose the Intel 660p SSDs, there are 3 storage capacities available including 512GB, 1TB, and 2TB. If you want to purchase the Samsung 970 EVO SSDs, capacities including 250GB, 512GB, 1TB, and 2TB are available for you.
According to a survey, the Intel 660p is less expensive than the 970 EVO per GB.
You can pay about $112 for 1TB Intel 660p SSD, while you need to pay $180 for 1TB 970 EVO. That’s why many people are confused about whether it’s worth sticking with 970 EVO.
# 3. Cache Memory
Cache memory is a type of chip-based computer component. As a temporary storage area between RAM and CPU, it enables the data to be retrieved from the RAM more efficiently. Cache memory can be used to speed up and synchronize with high-speed CPU. It also saves frequently requested data and instructions.
For 1TB storage capacity, the Samsung 970 EVO SSD provides 1GB cache memory, while the cache memory of the Intel 660p is not applicable. If the cache memory is also important for you, then the 970 EVO is a good choice.
# 4. Power Consumption
Power consumption is a very important aspect to consider for Intel 660p vs 970 EVO gaming. Some SSDs will consume several watts of power at idle, while an efficient SSD just consume mill watts. Different brands of SSD and storage capacities have an impact on power consumption.
According to a survey from tom’s hardware, the 1TB Intel 660p SSD is one of the most efficient SSDs. It only consumes 2.31 watts of power when transferring a 50GB file, while Samsung 970 EVO consumes more power.
Here you can refer to this form created by tom’s hardware. The lower watts of power the SSD consumes, the more efficient the SSD is.
# 5. Reliability
In addition to the above information, it is necessary to compare the reliability between Samsung 970 EVO vs 660p. Both of the two SSDs are designed with 256-Bit AES Hardware Encryption, but they differ from the aspects of endurance (Total Bytes Written) and MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures).
Compared with the Intel 660p SSD, Samsung 970 EVO SSD boasts better-written endurance and lower MTBF. The Intel 660p provides 200TBW endurance, while 970 EVO provides 600TBW. The MTBF of Intel 660p is 1.6 million hours, while the 970 EVO is 1.5 million hours.
All the detailed comparison on Intel 660p vs Samsung 970 EVO has been told to you.
Is Intel 660p better than 970 EVO? In fact, the answer depends on your specific needs. If you want a cost-effective and less power consumption SSD, then the Intel 660p is a good choice. If you want to have the fast speed for your gaming laptop, then Samsung 970 EVO is very suitable.
How to Upgrade to Intel 660p/970 EVO Without Reinstalling OS
SSDs are often used to upgrade the hard disk on your laptop. No matter you choose the Intel 660p or Samsung 970 EVO, you need to replace the previous hard disk with the new SSD. How to upgrade to SSD without reinstalling OS?
For that, you can use MiniTool Partition Wizard to migrate OS safely. Here is a complete guide for you:
Tip: Since MiniTool Partition Wizard Free Edition doesn’t support the Migrate OS to SSD/HD Wizard feature, you need to get its advanced editions. You can use its Pro Ultimate edition or other advanced editions.
Step 1. Launch this program to enter its main interface, and then select Migrate OS to SSD/HD Wizard from the left pane.
Step 2. In the pop-up window, select Option B to copy the system required partitions only and click on Next to go on.
Step 3. Select the SSD that you connect to the computer and click on Next.
Note: This operation will delete all the data on the drive. So, please backup all important data on the target drive in advance. Click on Yes to confirm this operation.
Step 4. Select a copy option based on your needs and click on Next to continue.
Step 5. Click on the Finish and Apply buttons to execute this system migration.
Now, your Operating System is migrated to the SSD successfully.
This post mainly focuses on Intel 660p vs Samsung 970 EVO. If you are also trying to make a wise choice between the Intel 660p and 970 EVO, this post is what you need.
Click to Tweet
What’s Your Opinion
This post compares the 2 SSDs from the aspects of disk performance, capacity, cache memory, power consumption, and reliability. Right now, you should know how to make a wise choice between Samsung 970 EVO vs 660p.
If you have any questions about this software, please send us an e-mail via [email protected]. We also appreciate any ideas in the comment area
Intel 660p VS 970 EVO FAQ
What the difference between Samsung 970 EVO and Intel 660p?
The biggest difference between the 2 SSDs is that their data speed. Compared with Intel 660p SSD, Samsung 970 EVO has faster read and write speed. Besides, they differ from the aspects of cache memory, power consumption, and reliability.
Which is better 970 EVO or EVO Plus?
The differences between 970 EVO vs EVO Plus mainly focus on their Form Factor, capacity, disk performance, work environment, and price. The 970 EVO plus has faster data speed than 970 EVO but with less money.
What are the best NVMe SSDs for gaming 2020?
If you want to improve your laptop performance, you can consider choosing the several NVMe SSDs below:
- Samsung 970 EVO series
- Sabrent Rocket Q SSD
- Corsair Force MP600
- WD Black SN750
- Addlink S70 512GB
Is the Intel 660p worth it?
The Intel 660p is a cost-effective SSD that has a good performance, This SSD is designed with the fast PCIe 4.0 interface and M.2 form factor. Its data speed can rate up to 1.8GB/s. Besides, it offers surprise power efficiency.
Intel SSD 670p Review: Snappy, Budget-Friendly NVMe Storage
Intel is releasing a new family of solid state drives today, targeting mainstream users and everyday computing tasks.
The new Intel SSD 670p series leverages the company’s latest 144-layer QLC 3D NAND flash memory technology, with an improved dynamic SLC caching algo and updated PCIe Gen 3 controller.
Unlike some of the more recent ultra-high-end PCIe Gen 4 SSDs to be released recently, complete with insanely high sequential transfer speeds north of 7GB/s, the Intel SSD 670p eschews the blazing sequentials in favor of optimized performance for random transfers at low queue depths that are more common in every day computing task and contribute to better overall system responsiveness. That’s not to say the Intel SSD 670p is a slow SSD, though – it still offers peak transfers north of 3GB/s.
Here’s a breakdown of the drive’s main features and specifications and we’ll move on to some benchmarks in a just a bit…
|
s NVMe Solid State DrivesFind Intel SSD 670p Solid State Drives @ Amazon
The Intel SSD 670p will initially be offered in three capacities, 512GB, 1TB, and 2TB. We have the highest-capacity 2TB model represented here represented in the pictures below and tested a little later on.
All of the drives in the Intel SSD 670p series use to the same M.2 (2280) 80mm, single-sided «gumstick» form factor. The drives offer sequential read speeds of up to 3.5GB/s with writes of up to 2.7GB/s, with 20K and 54K random read and write IOPs (at QD1), respectively. That kind of performance is much better than anything hanging off a SATA interface can muster, but it is not in the same league as more expensive NVMe PCIe-based drives, like Samsung’s 970 EVO / 980 PRO or the ADATA XPG GAMMIX S70 we evaluated recently.
As mentioned earlier, all of the drives in the 670p family leverage Intel’s latest 144-layer QLC 3D NAND flash memory, which is more economical to produce than previous-gen TLC or MLC NAND. Paired to the NAND is a small DRAM cache, and a native NVMe PCI Express controller built by Silicon Motion (SMI) – the SMI 2262, to be exact.
If you inspect the pics here, you’ll notice there’s virtually nothing happening on the back of the drive, and the front is home to the controller, the QLC NAND, and DRAM cache. The native NVMe-controller has a x4 PCIe Gen 3.0 interface (max bandwidth of 4GB/s – this isn’t a PCIe Gen 4 drive) and the drives support all of the features you’d expect from a modern SSD, like TRIM, garbage collection, S.M.A.R.T., etc.
Like many drives that use TLC NAND, Intel configures a portion of the NAND on these drives to act as an SLC cache for faster write throughput. Depending on the unused capacity of the drive, however, the ultimate size of the SLC cache will dynamically adjust up or down.
Though there is a base level that remains constant, the overall amount of SLC available to accelerate writes changes based on the total and unused capacity of the drive. The slide below outlines where it falls on all three models.
Should the SLC cache be exhausted, write performance will degrade, however, doing so requires relatively large sequential writes. If you’re not copying or writing large amounts of fresh data, the size of the SLC cache is plenty for day-to-day consumer workloads.
Intel warranties the SSD 670p series drives for 5 years, which is on par with other NVMe PCIe solid state drives, and endurance is rated for 185 TBW per 512GB of capacity, which is an 85% improvement over the older 660p series. It is somewhat lower versus come competing drives though, but endurance should still be plenty for most consumers.
In terms of the packaging and bundle, everything included with the 2TB Intel SSD 670p is pictured above.
The drive comes in a simple box with cardboard reinforcement and a plastic shield, and that’s it. Support for the 670p series is already enabled in Intel’s MAS GUI tool, which is available as a free download from Intel’s site.
Intel SSD 670p 2TB Benchmarks
Under each test condition, the SSDs tested here were installed as secondary volumes in our testbed, with a separate drive used for the OS and benchmark installations. Our testbed’s motherboard was updated with the latest BIOS available at the time of publication. The SSDs were secure erased prior to testing (when applicable), and left blank without partitions for some tests, while others required them to be partitioned and formatted, as is the case with the ATTO, PCMark, and CrystalDiskMark tests. Windows firewall, automatic updates, and screen savers were all disabled before testing and Windows 10 Quiet Hours / Focus Assist was enabled.
In all test runs, we rebooted the system, ensured all temp and prefetch data was purged, waited several minutes for drive activity to settle and for the system to reach an idle state before invoking a test.
Also note, we have completely revamped our test bed, so the numbers shown in this evaluation aren’t comparable to previous articles. All of the drives here have also been updated to their latest firmware and where applicable.
|
|
As we’ve noted in previous SSD articles, though IOMeter is clearly a well-respected industry standard benchmark, the fact of the matter is, though our results with IOMeter scale, it is debatable as to whether or not certain access patterns actually provide a valid example of real-world performance.
The access patterns we tested may not reflect your particular workload, for example. That said, we do think IOMeter is a reliable gauge for relative throughput, latency, and bandwidth with a given storage solution. In addition, there are certain highly-strenuous workloads you can place on a drive with IOMeter, that you can’t with most other storage benchmark tools.
In the following tables, we’re showing two sets of access patterns; a custom Workstation pattern, with an 8K transfer size, consisting of 80% reads (20% writes) and 80% random (20% sequential) access and a 4K access pattern with a 4K transfer size, comprised of 67% reads (33% writes) and 100% random access. Queue depths from 1 to 32 were tested…
Although the Intel SSD 670p is optimized for random transfers at low queue depths, the read / write mix and access patters we used has the drive performing below all of the others we tested, save for the entry-level WD Blue SN500.
Actual transfer speeds with the access patters we used mirror the number of IOPs offered by the drives, so the charts don’t look any different. As you can see, none of the drives offer more than few hundred MB/s at QD1; they don’t really get to stretch their legs until QD8.
The latency characteristics of the 2TB Intel SSD 670 are better then the WD Blue SN500, but trail the other drives — at least according to IOMeter.
|
Next we used SiSoft SANDRA, the the System ANalyzer, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant for some quick tests.
Here, we used the File System Test and provide the results from our comparison SSDs. Read and write performance metrics, along with the overall drive score, are detailed below.
The Intel SSD 670p offered much better reads and has a better overall drive score than the Intel SSD 760p and WD Blue SN500. It’s actually in the same neighborhood as the excellent Samsung SSD 970 Pro, save for its peak read performance.
|
ATTO is another «quick and dirty» type of disk benchmark that measures transfer speeds across a specific volume length. It measures raw transfer rates for both reads and writes and graphs them out in an easily interpreted chart. We chose .5KB through 64MB transfer sizes and a queue depth of 6 over a total max volume length of 256MB.
ATTO’s workloads are sequential in nature and measure raw bandwidth, rather than I/O response time, access latency, etc.
In ATTO’s read and write bandwidth tests, the new Intel SSD 670p lands right about in the middle of the pack, on-par with or slightly better than the Samsung SSD 970 Pro. Reads peaked in the 3GB/s range with writes hovering around 2.7GB/s, at least with the larger transfer sizes. With 4K transfers all of the drives are tightly grouped.
IO performance according to ATTO also has the Intel SSD 670p performing right about in the middle of the pack. Overall, IOs are roughly in-line with the mainstream, PCIe Gen 4 ADATA XPG GAMMIX S50 Lite.
|
Next up we ran the Compression Benchmark built-into AS SSD, an SSD specific benchmark being developed by Alex Intelligent Software.
This test is interesting because it uses a mix of compressible and non-compressible data and outputs both Read and Write throughput of the drive. We only graphed a small fraction of the data (1% compressible, 50% compressible, and 100% compressible), but the trend is representative of the benchmark’s complete results.
The compressibility of the data being transferred across the drives has minimal impact on performance and, as you would expect based on its specifications, the Intel SSD 670p once again lands right about in the middle of the pack, slightly ahead of the Samsung SSD 970 Pro overall.
Overview of SSD drives Samsung 970 Evo 250, 500 GB and 1 TB
The line of Samsung 970 solid state drives is currently the most productive in the Korean brand’s model range. Modifications Pro and Evo are intended for installation in workstations and personal computers of enthusiasts. Compact drives (they use V-NAND 3-bit MLC memory) in the M.
2 (2280) form factor transmit information over the PCIe Gen 3.0 x4 (NVMe 1.3) interface, heart of each device is a Samsung Phoenix controller.
The Samsung 970 Evo lineup features some of the best M.2 (2280) drives in the class.
A domestic user who is not alien to modern computer technologies knows that in our latitudes the best are SSD drives from two companies: Intel and Samsung.
Actually, a user choosing a high-speed M.2 format drive will, in 90% of cases, stop at a product from one of these brands, which is quite justified, because both manufacturers have proven that their developments are the most advanced, and the final solutions are highly efficient and reliable .
There are four devices in the Samsung 970 Evo line, they differ only in size (although the linear speeds of the older models are slightly higher than those of the initial ones). We have three modifications at our disposal: 250, 500 GB and 1 TB.
We will talk about them today.
Specifications
Externally, devices marked MZ-V7E250BW (250 GB), MZ-V7E500BW (500 GB) and MZ-V7E1T0BW (1 TB) are no different. Each drive is a miniature module with an M.2 connector that fits into the appropriate slot on the motherboard.
There are still tales circulating the net about compatibility issues with PCIe Gen 3.0 x4 (NVMe 1.3) drives with existing motherboards. If you already have a device on a relatively new chipset, fresh Intel 4-8 generation processor, as well as the Windows 10 operating system, there is nothing to worry about.
Immediately after installing the Samsung 970 Evo in the profile slot, the BIOS will detect the device and allow you to install the operating system on the available area without any problems.
| MZ-V7E250BW | MZ-V7E500BW | MZ-V7E1T0BW | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 250GB | 500GB | 1TB |
| Form factor | M. 2 (2280) |
M.2 (2280) | M.2 (2280) |
| Controller | Samsung Phoenix | Samsung Phoenix | Samsung Phoenix |
| Interface | PCIe Gen 3.0 x4, NVMe 1.3 | PCIe Gen 3.0 x4, NVMe 1.3 | PCIe Gen 3.0 x4, NVMe 1.3 |
| Memory type | Samsung V-NAND 3-bit MLC | Samsung V-NAND 3-bit MLC | Samsung V-NAND 3-bit MLC |
| Sequential Read/Write | 3400/1500 MB/s | 3400/2300 MB/s | 3400/2500 MB/s |
| Random Read/Write | 200000/350000 IOPS | 370000/450000 IOPS | 500000/480000 IOPS |
| Power consumption | 9 W | 10 W | 10 W |
| MTBF | 1.5 million hours | 1.5 million hours | 1.5 million hours |
| TBW | 150 | 300 | 600 |
| TRIM support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| S. |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
| WWN support | No | No | No |
| Dimensions | 80x22x2 mm | 80x22x2 mm | 80x22x2 mm |
| Weight | 8 g | 8 g | 8 g |
It is important to note that the TBW (reflects the degree of reliability of the SSD during the warranty period) is different for each Samsung 970 Evo model, however, all drives from this line are covered by a 5-year warranty.
Before analyzing the performance of each of the reviewed drives, let us remind you that the declared linear read/write speeds for the entire Samsung 970 Evo model range are approximately the same: 3500/2500 MB/s (this is the absolute maximum). In practice, it is difficult to fix such indicators even in pure form, but first things first.
Test bench:
Processor — Intel Core i9-7960X
Motherboard — ASUS Prime X299-A
RAM — Kingston HyperX Fury DDR4-2666 8 GB
Operating system — Windows 10 64-bit
Performance and test results
In fact, any digital inconsistencies (actual versus claimed speeds) can spoil the impression of a new product. We hasten to reassure you. Already after the first launch of a PC with a Samsung 970 Evo disk installed inside, you will appreciate the qualitative changes in the system.
Owners of hard drives and SSDs connected via SATA III will notice a particularly high speed difference. It’s really a brand new format.
The OS installs in minutes, Windows starts in less than 10 seconds (including autoloading profile programs), applications and games load extremely quickly. This is how a modern system should work, and this is only possible with NVMe drives.
Already after the first start of the PC with the Samsung 970 Evo disk installed inside, you will appreciate the qualitative changes in the system operation.
Therefore, if you are far from linear read / write indicators and others numbers , with which are so fond of measuring regulars of forums and computer enthusiasts, you should not bother yourself with unnecessary data. Simply install the Samsung 970 Evo into your system and enjoy top-notch performance.
However, digital ground for reflection for those who really need it, we still provide. Take a look at the test results.
The real figures are far from the declared ones. And significantly (and this was to be expected). We filled each of the reviewed drives with information of different caliber (25-50% of the available area).
Regardless of the size, all three modifications of the Samsung 970 Evo (250, 500 GB or 1 TB) demonstrate approximately equal speeds (both sequential and random).
Of course, 3500 MB/s reading is out of the question, the real figure does not exceed 2200 MB/s. Linear recording is also far from the declared 2500 MB / s (in fact, only 400-500 MB / s). But, again, these are just numbers, which are already quite high.
Samsung 970 Evo 250 GB
Samsung 970 Evo 500 GB
Samsung 970 Evo 1TB
The Samsung 970 Evo has a competitor called the Intel SSD 760p. The effective indicators of the two models are very close, so it is not clear which of these drives is better (surprisingly, even the cost of two opposing solutions in domestic retail is the same).
Samsung Magician
A special application called Samsung Magician has been created for Samsung 970 Evo drives, you can download it from the official website.
This is a multifunctional program that monitors the health of a disk, allows you to test it (the software, of course, demonstrates top read / write speeds), optimize it and correctly reserve the available space.
In principle solid state Samsung 970 Evo works fine even without this utility, its installation does not affect the performance of devices.
Conclusion
Every Samsung product 9The 70 Evo is the same accelerator that craves for in almost any system of the average or advanced user. About 7-10 years ago, the most popular and least expensive method of speeding up a PC (essentially an upgrade) was to increase the amount of RAM.
Nowadays, there is a more effective alternative — installing an NVMe SSD. Believe me, the qualitative changes from such a step will be the most noticeable.
And let the real speed performance of Samsung 970 Evo do not fully correspond to the declared ones. This fact does not significantly affect the overall performance of the computer (after all, these are just abstract numbers).
The Samsung 970 Evo lineup features some of the best M.2 (2280) drives in the class, they are not cheap products, but trust me, they are worth it. Recommended.
Keywords: Samsung
Samsung has revised the prices of the new 970 Pro and 970 Evo NVMe drives, making them even more affordable
The day before the sales of the brand new Samsung 970 Pro and 970 Evo NVMe drives, the South Korean manufacturer decided to revise the initially set recommended prices, increasing the attractiveness of their devices in the eyes of a potential buyer.
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe drives dropped the most, losing 25% of their original price. At the same time, in the case of the 970 Evo line, the discount is less significant and varies between 5-13%. The table below can be compared at a price of 970 Pro and 970 Evo with predecessors and popular offers of competitors, including in terms of changing the cost per gigabyte.
| 240-256 GB | 400-512GB | 960-1024GB | 2 TB | |
| Samsung 970 Pro |
— |
$249.99 (49¢/GB) |
$499.99 (49¢/GB) |
— |
| Samsung 970 Evo |
$109.99 (44¢/GB) |
$199.99 (40¢/GB) |
$399.99 (40¢/GB) |
$799.99 (40¢/GB) |
| Samsung 960 Pro |
— |
$319.25 (62¢/GB) |
$604.65 (59¢/GB) |
$1249. (61¢/GB) |
| Samsung 960 Evo |
$117.99 (47¢/GB) |
$219.55 (44¢/GB) |
$432.35 (43¢/GB) |
— |
| WD Black 3D NAND |
$119.99 (48¢/GB) |
$234.24 (47¢/GB) |
$449.99 (45¢/GB) |
— |
| Intel SSD 760p |
$116.25 (45¢/GB) |
$215.45 (42¢/GB) |
$399.99 (39¢/GB) |
$1730.01 (84¢/GB) |
| Plextor M9Pe |
$119.99 (47¢/GB) |
$209.19 (41¢/GB) |
— |
— |
| HP EX920 |
$109.99 (43¢/GB) |
$199.99 (39¢/GB) |
$349. |