Is Intel i3 better than Celeron?
Intel Core i3 vs Intel Celeron
Updated: Jan 20, 2023 1:23 pm
Share this article…
Intel i3
Intel Core i3-13100
Celeron
Intel Celeron G5905
Intel i3 vs. Celeron – which is better?
Final thoughts
The core i3 and Celeron are two processor series we commonly hear about from Intel. Both of these series are generally considered at the lower end of the performance and price spectrum.
They’re usually featured in laptops, and it’s rare to find a modern-day prebuilt PC that features either.
Still, due to the affordability of both i3 and Celeron processors, those looking to build a PC without breaking the bank often gravitate toward them. If you’re in a similar situation, you may be wondering which of the two is better.
Intel i3
The Intel Core i3 series features Intel’s lowest-end processors within the “core” CPU series. Core i3 processors these days have four cores and eight threads, meaning they’re quad-core processors with hyperthreading enabled. They feature max clock speeds upwards of 4GHz, which isn’t too shabby, even by modern-day standards.
The older i3 processors (8th gen and below, to be more specific), used to have 2 cores and far lower clock speeds, often barely above 3GHz. But they’ve long been discontinued, and you won’t find them in markets anymore.
The Intel core i3-13100 is the latest i3 processor. Since it’s the newest generation, it also has the best specs for an i3 and is probably your best option within the said series.
Intel Core i3-13100
Brand
Intel
CPU Model
Core i3
Cores (Threads)
4 (8)
CPU Speed
4.5 GHz
CPU Socket
LGA 1151
- Cores: 4
- Threads: 8
- Base clock: 3.4GHz
- Boost clock: 4.5Ghz
- TDP: 60 watts
Celeron
Celeron processors don’t belong to Intel’s core series, but they have much of the same architecture.
It’s just that they differ massively in performance.
Celeron processors typically feature two cores – without hyperthreading. Yup, that’s pretty bad.
They also have much lower clock speeds; most of them sit at a 1GHz clock. That’s about as low as it gets.
As I’m sure you can tell, Celeron processors were really only intended to be used in laptops and notebooks for browsing and light applications. You can’t game or do anything CPU-intensive on most of them.
A select few Celeron processors do come equipped with higher clock speeds, though, such as the G5905. Here are its specs:
Intel Celeron G5905
Brand
Intel
CPU Model
Celeron_M
CPU Speed
3.5 GHz
CPU Socket
Socket LGA-1200
- Cores: 2
- Threads: 2
- Core clock: 3.5GHz
- TDP: 58 watts
Intel i3 vs. Celeron – which is better?
The stats speak for themselves: i3 processors outperform Celeron processors by a considerable margin in most, if not all, performance-determining specs: Core count, thread count, clock speed, and even power efficiency.
Yes, Celeron CPUs do consume less power, but they also offer bare-bones performance. Core i3 processors consume somewhat more power but are highly power-efficient because of their comparatively high performance.
In most cases, the i3 will be the better option – by a long shot. Celeron processors only have a use case in laptops and notebooks designed for browsing, reading, and learning, where battery life is the single-largest concern. You won’t be able to game on a Celeron processor, unfortunately.
Core i3 processors – even though they pale in comparison to their i5, i7, and i9 cousins – can still let you game on 60FPS.
Final thoughts
Intel i3 and Celeron series CPUs both consist of Intel’s budget offerings. However, between the two, the i3 series is the clear winner in performance and value.
Celeron only comes out on top when power consumption is the only important metric. While core i3 processors have better power efficiency, Celeron CPUs consume less power overall.
WePC is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more
Intel Celeron N3060 vs. Intel Core i3-7300 Specs & Speed
| Product | Celeron N3060 | Core i3-7300 |
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Street Price (Approx) | Search low Celeron N3060 price (Amazon) | ~ $145 Search low Core i3-7300 price (Amazon) |
| # CPU Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Frequency (GHz) | 1.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Cache (MB) | 4 | |
| TDP (Watts) | 6 W | 51 W |
| Product Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Status | Released | Released |
| Announced On | 2016-01-01 | 2017-01-01 |
| Technicals | Celeron N3060 | Core i3-7300 |
| Dimensions (2D) | 25×25 mm | 37. 5×37.5 mm |
| Conflict Free? | 1 | 1 |
| # CPU Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads/Core | 2 | 4 |
| Frequency (GHz) | 1.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency (GHz) | na GHz | |
| Cache (MB) | 4 | |
| Cache L2 (MB) | 2 | |
| Instructions Width (bits) | 64 | 64 |
| Instructions Extensions | SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 | |
| Lithography Process (nm) | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP (Watts) | 6 W | 51 W |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
| # Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max CPU Temp. | 90 | |
| Max CPU / Package | 1 | 1 |
| GPU | Intel® HD Graphics 630 | |
| PCI-E Version | 2 | 3 |
| PCI-E Configurations | 1×4/2×2/1×2 + 2×1/4×1 | |
| PCI-E Max Lanes # | 4 | 16 |
| Compatible Sockets | FCLGA1151 | |
| Intel Turbo Boost Version |
| Intel V-Pro | No | No |
| Intel Hyper-Thread | No | Yes |
| Intel Virtualization (VTX) | Yes | Yes |
| Intel Directed I/O (VTD) | No | Yes |
Intel Ext. Page Tables (EPT) |
Yes | Yes |
| Intel TSX Sync. Extensions | Yes | |
| Intel 64 | Yes | Yes |
| Idle States | Yes | Yes |
| Enhanced Speedstep | Yes | |
| Thermal MonitoringTech. | Yes | Yes |
| Intel ID Protect | Yes | Yes |
| Intel SIPP | No | No |
| Intel SMB Advantage | No | |
| Smart Response Technology | No | |
| Intel AES New Instructions | Yes | Yes |
| Intel Secure Key | Yes | Yes |
| Intel SGX | Yes | |
| Intel MPX | Yes | |
| Intel OS Guard | No | Yes |
| Trusted Execution | No | |
| Execution Disable | Yes | Yes |
Intel Celeron N3060 vs.
Intel Core i3-7300 Specs & Speed Benchmarks
Intel Celeron N3060 vs. Intel Core i3-7300 Specs & Speed Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 Multi
Higher is better
Geekbench 4 Single
Higher is better
Geekbench 4 Multi / Price (Market)
Higher is better
Intel Core i3 1005G1 vs Celeron N4020:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i3 1005G1
Intel Celeron N4020
Which is better: Intel Core i3 1005G1 at 1.2 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 3.4) or Celeron N4020 at 1.1 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 0.0)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 2-core laptop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i3 1005g1
48
Celeron N4020
22
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nuclei 9 are involved0003
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3 1005G1
- Supports up to 64 GB DDR4-3200
- 2.
2 times faster in Geekbench v5 single core test — 1028 and 468 points - Newer PCI Express standard — 3.0
- Newer PCI Express standard — 3.0
- 14 nanometers
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i3 1005G1
+142%
1100
Celeron N4020
454
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i3 1005G1
+216%
2450
Celeron N4020
775
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i3 1005G1
+91%
2212
Celeron N4020
1156
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i3 1005G1
+220%
4994
Celeron N4020
1559
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i3 1005G1
+119%
1019
Celeron N4020
466
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i3 1005G1
+159%
2204
Celeron N4020
852
Add your Cinebench R23 results
Specifications
List of full specifications of Intel Core i3 1005G1 and Celeron N4020
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Release date | August 1, 2019 | November 4, 2019 |
| Type | For laptop | For laptop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Ice Lake | — |
| Model number | i3-1005G1 | N4020 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics G1 | UHD Graphics 600 |
Processor
| cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Frequency | 1. 2 GHz |
1.1 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 3.4 GHz | — |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Multiplier | 12x | — |
| Tire speed | 4 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 96KB (per core) | 32KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 512KB (per core) | 4MB (shared) |
| Level 3 cache | 4MB (shared) | — |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| Process | 10 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Socket | BGA-1526 | BGA-1090 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15W | 6W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 105°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics G1 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| GPU frequency | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Shader blocks | 256 | 96 |
| TMUs | 32 | 12 |
| ROPs | 4 | 2 |
| Computer units | — | 12 |
| TGP | 15 W | 5W |
Max. resolution |
5120×3200 — 60Hz | 3840×2160 — 30Hz |
Igpu Flops
Core i3 1005g1
N/D
Celeron N4020
0.14 Teraflops
Memory Support
| Memory type | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 | DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400 | |
| Max. size | 64 GB | 8 GB | |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 | |
| ECC support | No | No |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i3 1005G1 | Site Intel Celeron N4020 |
| PCI Express version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | — | 6 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2, AVX-512 | SSE4.2 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i3 1005G1
160 (63.
5%)
Celeron N4020
92 (36.5%)
Total votes: 252
Competitors
1.
Pentium Gold 7505 and Core i3 1005G1
2.
Pentium Silver N5030 and Core i3 1005G1
3.
Core i5 1135G7 and Celeron N4020
4.
Pentium Silver N6000 and Celeron N4020
5.
Pentium Silver N5030 and Celeron N4020
6.
Celeron N4500 and Celeron N4020
Compare other CPUs (480+)
Comparison of Intel Celeron N4500 and Intel Core i3-10110U
Comparative analysis of the Intel Celeron N4500 and Intel Core i3-10110U processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability, Technology , Virtualization.
Processor performance analysis by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan ( Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Celeron N4500
versus
100012 more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 10 nm vs 14 nm
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
| Process | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-10110U
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Approximately 46% more clock speed: 4.
10 GHz vs 2.80 GHz - 4x more max memory: 64 GB vs 16 GB
- PassMark benchmark performance — Single thread mark about 62% more: 2233 vs 1375
- PassMark performance — CPU mark about 98% more: 3965 vs 2004
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.10 GHz vs 2.80 GHz |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 16 GB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2233 vs 1375 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 3965 vs 2004 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N4500
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-10110U
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
| Name | Intel Celeron N4500 | Intel Core i3-10110U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1375 | 2233 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 2004 | 3965 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
1577 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1577 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3000 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3000 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 9350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 9350 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Celeron N4500 | Intel Core i3-10110U | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Jasper Lake | Comet Lake |
| Production date | Q1’21 | 21 Aug 2019 |
| Place in the ranking | 1585 | 290 |
| Processor Number | N4500 | i3-10110U |
| Series | Intel Celeron Processor N Series | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Applicability | Mobile | Laptop |
| Price at first issue date | $281 | |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1. 10 GHz |
2.10 GHz |
| Level 3 cache | 4MB | 4MB |
| Process | 10nm | 14nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 100 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.80 GHz | 4.10 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | |
| Level 1 cache | 128KB | |
| Level 2 cache | 512KB | |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | 16GB | 64GB |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 LPDDR4x | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 |
| ECC support | ||
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41. |
|
| Device ID | 0x4E55 | 0x9B41 |
| Number of execution units | 16 | 23 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 300MHz |
| Maximum GPU clock | 750MHz | 1.00 GHz |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technology | ||
| Video memory size | 32GB | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 | 3 |
| DVI | ||
| 4K support | ||
| Maximum resolution via DisplayPort | [email protected] | [email protected] |
| Maximum resolution via eDP | [email protected] | [email protected] |
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4 |
[email protected] | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Maximum number of processors per configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 35mm x 24mm | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.8W | |
| Supported sockets | FCBGA1338 | FCBGA1528 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-down | 10 Watt | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 800MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 25 Watt | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 2. |
|
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Integrated Wireless | Intel Wireless-AX MAC | |
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 8 | 16 |
| Maximum number of SATA 6 Gb/s ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 14 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.2 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3. 0 |
|
| PCIe configurations | 1×4, 2×2, 1×2+2×1 and 4×1 | |
| Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Mode-based Execute Control (MBE) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| General Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel SSE4.
|