Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 vs Intel Core i7-4770
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 vs Intel Core i7-4770
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 on one side and the Intel Core i7-4770 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,7GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 | Intel Core i7-4770 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Penryn | Haswell | ||||||
| Core name | Yorkfield-6M | Haswell-DT | ||||||
| Family | Core 2 Quad 9000 | Core i7-4000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | BX80580Q9400, BXC80580Q9400, AT80580PJ0676M, SLB6B |
BX80646I74770, BXC80646I74770, CM8064601464303, SR149 |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2008 | Q2 2013 | ||||||
| Lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 456. 000.000 |
1.400.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,7 GHz | 3,4 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | — | 3,9 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 6 MB | 8 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR2-2800 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 95 W | 84 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 20 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 160 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 1200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 352 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA1150 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 775 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 71. 4°C |
72.7°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 221 | 396 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 837 | 2.056 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 127 | 152 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 375 | 734 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 589 | 762 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 2.340 | 3.349 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.129 | 2.163 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 2. 034 |
7.025 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
1.774 | 4.232 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
4.866 | 13.720 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
54,7 GFLOPS | 197,9 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
51 pts / W | 163 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-4770 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i7-4770 is less. The Intel Core i7-4770 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-4770 |
396 2.  056 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
221 837 |
In single core, the difference is 79%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 146%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-4770 |
152 734 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
127 375 |
In single core, the difference is 20%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 96%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-4770 |
762 3.349 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
589 2.340 |
In single core, the difference is 29%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 43%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-4770 |
2.163 7.025 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
1.  1292.034 |
In single core, the difference is 92%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 245%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-4770 |
4.232 13.720 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
1.  7744.866 |
In single core, the difference is 139%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 182%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-4770 |
4.297 12.394 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
1.834 4.806 |
In single core, the difference is 134%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 158%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-4770 |
2.700 6.907 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
1.212 1.902 |
In single core, the difference is 123%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 263%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-4770 |
4.423 14.635 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
1.863 5.199 |
In single core, the difference is 137%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 181%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing.
This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 AMD equivalentIntel Core i7-4770 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i7-4770HQIntel Core i7-4770KIntel Core i7-4770SIntel Core i7-4771
Core 2 Quad Q9400 vs Core i7-1165G7
Availability
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 / 2.66 GHz Processor (U36011) Category: Processors
Buy on Amazon
$38.03
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1165G7 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1165G7 is 4406 days newer than Core 2 Quad Q9400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1165G7
- Performs up to 42% better in League of Legends than Core 2 Quad Q9400 — 1087 vs 764 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 — 28 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 — 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 doesn’t have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core 2 Quad Q9400
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2008
FPS
764
70%
Value, $/FPS
$0.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$38.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 / 2.66 GHz Processor (U36011) Category: Processors
Buy for $38.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Core i7-1165G7
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
FPS
1087
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core 2 Quad Q9400
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2008
Core i7-1165G7
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
186
FPS
273
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
326
FPS
476
FPS
VALORANT
764
FPS
1087
FPS
League of Legends
202
FPS
293
FPS
Fortnite
198
FPS
298
FPS
Apex Legends
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core 2 Quad Q9400
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2008
Single-Core
376
28%
Multi-Core
1189
27%
Core i7-1165G7
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Single-Core
1357
100%
Multi-Core
4412
100%
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
vs |
Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2008 | Release Date |
Sep 2nd, 2020 |
| Core 2 Quad | Collection | Core i7 |
| Yorkfield | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 775 | Socket | Intel BGA 1449 |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads |
8 |
2. 7 GHz |
Base Clock Speed |
2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP |
28 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size |
10 nm |
| 8.0x | Multiplier |
28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core 2 Quad Q9400 or Core i7-1165G7
League of Legends, 1080p, High
ASUS ZenBook 15.6” FHD Touchscreen Display Laptop
433
FPS
$
2.31
/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Core i7-1165G7
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$999.99
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
ASUS ZenBook 15.
6” FHD Touchscreen Display Laptop
433
FPS
$
2.63
/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Core i7-1165G7
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,139.99
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Razer Blade Stealth 13 Ultrabook Gaming Laptop
388
FPS
$
6.19
/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Core i7-1165G7
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$2,399.99
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Intel NUC 11 Enthusiast Kit NUC11PHKi7 Mini Desktop PC
593
FPS
$
1. 78
/FPS
GeForce RTX 2060
Core i7-1165G7
6 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,053.86
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Core 2 Quad Q9400
$38.03
Celeron G3900
Core i7-1165G7
N/A Stock
Celeron G3900
Core 2 Quad Q9400
$38.03
Core 2 Quad Q9300
Core i7-1165G7
N/A Stock
Core 2 Quad Q9300
Core 2 Quad Q9400
$38.03
Phenom X4 9600
$39.95
Core i7-1165G7
N/A Stock
Phenom X4 9600
$39.95
Core 2 Quad Q9400
$38.03
Athlon II X2 220
$29.86
Core i7-1165G7
N/A Stock
Athlon II X2 220
$29.86
Core 2 Quad Q9400
$38.03
Pentium E6500
Comparison of Intel Core i7-2670QM and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-2670QM and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score.
nine0003
Intel Core i7-2670QM
versus
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-2670QM
- Newer processor, release date difference 3 year(s) 3 month(s) Approx. frequency: 3.10 GHz vs 2.67 GHz
- Approximately 40% higher maximum core temperature: 100 °C vs 71.4°C
- A newer process of manufacturing the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- 2.
1 times lower power consumption: 45 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Approximately 16% increase in PassMark — Single thread mark performance: 1323 vs 1138
- Approximately 79% increase in PassMark — CPU mark performance: 3731 vs 2084
- Approximately 44% improvement in Geekbench 4 — Single Core performance: 541 vs 376
- Approximately 66% improvement in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance: 1915 vs 1151
- 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) benchmark: 3.114 vs 0.574
- Approximately 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 48.344 vs 26.509
- 2.7 times more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) benchmark: 0.364 vs 0.136
- 14.9 times more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark ) more: 1.403 vs 0.094
| Production date | November 2, 2011 vs August 2008 |
| Maximum frequency | 3. |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 71.4°C |
| Process | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1323 vs 1138 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 3731 vs 2084 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 541 vs 376 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1915 vs 1151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3. |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 48.344 vs 26.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.364 vs 0.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.403 vs 0.094 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
- L2 cache is 6 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in the CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining benchmark (mHash/s) is about 23% higher: 4.189 vs 3.414
| Level 2 cache | 6144 KB vs 1024 KB |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-2670QM
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1. |
|
nine0050 | ||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
nine0050 | ||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1. |
| CPU 1 |
| CPU 2 |
| CPU 1 |
| CPU 2 |
| Name | Intel Core i7-2670QM | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1323 | |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 3731 | 2084 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 541 | 376 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1915 | |
| CompuBench 1. |
3.114 | 0.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 48.344 | 26.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.364 | 0.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.403 | 0.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.414 | 4.189 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Core i7-2670QM | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Yorkfield | |
| Production date | November 2, 2011 | August 2008 |
| Price at first issue date | $175 | |
| Place in the ranking | 2782 | |
| Price now | $259 | $33. |
| Processor Number | i7-2670QM | Q9400 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 6.69 | 28.99 |
| Application | Mobile | Desktop |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2. |
2.66 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 1333 MHz FSB |
| Crystal area | 216mm | 164 mm2 |
| Level 1 cache | 256KB | 256KB |
| Level 2 cache | 1024KB | 6144KB |
| Level 3 cache | 6144KB | |
| Process | 32nm | 45nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 71. |
| Maximum frequency | 3.10 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 8 | |
| Number of transistors | 995 Million | 456 million |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| Permissible core voltage | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21. |
|
| Maximum memory size | 32GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Device ID | 0x116 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 650MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
| Maximum GPU clock | 1.1 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video Technology HD | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Integrated graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 | |
| CRT | nine0053 | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 2 | |
| SDVO | ||
| WiDi support | ||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors in | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37. |
37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Supported sockets | FCPGA988 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 16 | nine0053 |
| Revision PCI Express | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 2×4 | |
| Anti-Theft Technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel® AVX | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Parity FSB | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Comparison of Intel Core i7-860 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-860 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
nine0003
Intel Core i7-860
versus
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-860
- Newer processor, approx. frequency: 3.46 GHz vs 2.67 GHz
- About 2% more maximum core temperature: 72.7°C vs 71.4°C
- PassMark — Single thread mark performance about 17% more: 1326 vs 1138
- Approximately 41% increase in PassMark — CPU mark performance: 2945 vs 2084
- Approx.
35% increase in Geekbench 4 — Single Core performance: 507 vs 376
- Approx. 64% more: 1890 vs 1151
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) about 65% more: 0.949 vs 0.574
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 88% more: 49.877 vs 26.509
- 2.3x more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) benchmark: 0.312 vs 0.136
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark at 15.8 time(s) greater: 1.485 vs 0.094
| Release date | September 2009 vs August 2008 |
| Maximum frequency | |
| Maximum core temperature | 72.7°C vs 71.4°C |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1326 vs 1138 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 2945 vs 2084 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 507 vs 376 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1890 vs 1151 |
| CompuBench 1. |
0.949 vs 0.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 49.877 vs 26.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.312 vs 0.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.485 vs 0.094 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
- L2 cache is 6 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining benchmark performance (mHash/s) is about 1% higher: 4.189 vs 4.161
| Level 2 cache | 6144 KB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| CompuBench 1. |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-860
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
nine0050 | ||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | nine0046 | |||
| CPU 1 | ||||
| CPU 2 |
| CPU 1 |
| CPU 2 |
nine0050
| CPU 1 |
| CPU 2 |
| CPU 1 |
| CPU 2 |
| 49.877 |
| 26.509 |
| CPU 1 |
| CPU 2 |
| CPU 1 |
| CPU 2 |
| CPU 1 |
| CPU 2 |
nine0050
| Name | Intel Core i7-860 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1326 | 1138 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 2084 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 507 | 376 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1890 | 1151 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1. |
0.949 | 0.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 49.877 | 26.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.312 | 0.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.485 | 0.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.189 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Core i7-860 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Lynnfield | Yorkfield |
| Issue date | September 2009 | August 2008 |
| Price at first issue date | $229 | |
| Place in the ranking | 2375 | 2782 |
| Price now | $289. |
$33.98 |
| Processor Number | i7-860 | Q9400 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 5.09 | 28.99 |
| Applicability | Desktop | |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2. |
2.66 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s DMI | |
| Crystal area | 296 mm2 | 164 mm2 |
| Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256KB |
| Level 2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 6144KB |
| Level 3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | |
| Process | 45nm | 45nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.46 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | ||
| Number of transistors | 774 million | 456 million |
| Permissible core voltage | 0.6500V-1.4000V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37. |
37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Supported sockets | LGA1156 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1×16, 2×8 | |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. |