HD Graphics 405 [in 6 benchmarks]
HD Graphics 405
Buy
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x1
- Core clock speed 320
- Max video memory System Shared
- Memory type System Shared
- Memory clock speed System Shared
- Maximum resolution
Summary
Intel started HD Graphics 405 sales 1 April 2016. This is Gen. 8 architecture notebook card based on 14 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use.
Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 3.0 x1 interface. Power consumption is at 6 Watt.
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at
1.26%
of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
HD
Graphics 405
vs
GeForce RTX
4090
General info
Of HD Graphics 405’s architecture, market segment and release date.
| Place in performance rating | 936 | |
| Value for money | 0.63 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 (2015−2016) | |
| GPU code name | Braswell | |
| Market segment | Laptop | |
| Release date | 1 April 2016 (6 years ago) | |
| Current price | $254 | of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Value for money
To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Technical specs
HD Graphics 405’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed.
These parameters indirectly speak of HD Graphics 405’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | of 18432 (AD102) |
| Core clock speed | 320 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
| Boost clock speed | 700 MHz | of 2903 (Radeon Pro W6600) |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti) |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 6 Watt | of 900 (Tesla S2050) |
| Texture fill rate | 11.20 | of 939.8 (h200 SXM5) |
| Floating-point performance | 213.1 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on HD Graphics 405’s compatibility with other computer components.
Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it’s notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on HD Graphics 405: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | System Shared | |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) |
| Shared memory | + |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on HD Graphics 405.
As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
APIs supported by HD Graphics 405, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance of HD Graphics 405. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
HD Graphics 405
1.26
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280×1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet.
It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
HD Graphics 405
2081
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280×720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
HD Graphics 405
473
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280×720.
Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
HD Graphics 405
2113
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Benchmark coverage: 14%
HD Graphics 405
238
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920×1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
HD Graphics 405
255
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance.
It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280×720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
HD Graphics 405
23763
Game benchmarks
Let’s see how good HD Graphics 405 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 15 |
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 |
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | |
| Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 1−2 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | |
| Hitman 3 | 1−2 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1−2 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 |
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | |
| Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 1−2 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | |
| Hitman 3 | 1−2 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2 | |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1−2 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 |
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | |
| Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 1−2 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2 | |
| Hitman 3 | 1−2 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2 | |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1−2 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 |
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | |
| Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 1−2 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2 | |
| Hitman 3 | 1−2 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2 | |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1−2 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 |
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | |
| Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 1−2 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 |
Relative perfomance
Overall HD Graphics 405 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook video cards.
NVIDIA GeForce 710M
101.59
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
100.79
AMD Radeon HD 7570M
100
Intel HD Graphics 405
100
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
99.21
AMD Radeon HD 8410G
97.62
AMD Radeon R5 M240
96.83
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Radeon R7
M260
Compare
GeForce
710M
Compare
UHD
Graphics 605
Compare
Radeon HD
8410G
Compare
Radeon R5
M240
Compare
GeForce GT
720M
Compare
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with HD Graphics 405 according to our statistics.
Pentium
N3710
57.1%
Pentium
J3710
21.3%
Pentium
N3700
2.1%
Celeron
N3060
1.7%
Atom x7
Z8750
1.7%
Atom x7
Z8700
0.9%
Celeron
N3350
0.6%
Celeron
N2840
0.
4%
Pentium
N4200
0.4%
Pentium
N3540
0.3%
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about HD Graphics 405, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Intel HD Graphics 405 review: GPU specs, performance benchmarks
Buy on Amazon
HD Graphics 405 videocard released by Intel; release date: 1 April 2015. The videocard is designed for laptop-computers and based on Generation 8.0 microarchitecture codenamed Braswell GT1.
Core clock speed — 400 MHz.
Boost clock speed — 700 MHz. Texture fill rate — 13.32 GTexel / s. Pipelines — 16. Floating-point performance — 213.1 gflops. Manufacturing process technology — 14 nm. Transistors count — 189 million. Power consumption (TDP) — 6 Watt.
Memory bus width — 64 / 128 Bit.
Benchmarks
| Geekbench OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 1751 |
Games performance
1.
Hearthstone (2020)
2. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
3. League of Legends (2019)
4. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
5. Rocket League (2017)
6. Resident Evil 7 (2017)
7. Titanfall 2 (2016)
8. Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
9. Civilization VI (2016)
10. Mirror’s Edge Catalyst (2016)
11. Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
12. Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
13. Anno 2205 (2015)
14. World of Warships (2015)
15. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
16.
Dirt Rally (2015)
17. Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)
18. Alien: Isolation (2014)
19. Sims 4 (2014)
20. Thief (2014)
21. Battlefield 4 (2013)
22. BioShock Infinite (2013)
23. Tomb Raider (2013)
24. Diablo III (2012)
25. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
26. Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
Hearthstone (2020)
| Low, 1920×1080 | 17.80 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 18.00 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 9.91 |
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
| Low, 1024×768 | 42.60 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 32. 00 |
| High, 1366×768 | 20.40 |
League of Legends (2019)
| Low, 1280×720 | 23.60 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 18.00 |
| High, 1920×1080 | 13.90 |
Team Fortress 2 (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 19.60 |
Rocket League (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 18.70 |
Resident Evil 7 (2017)
| Low, 1280×720 | 13.50 |
| Medium, 1920×1080 | 11.00 |
Titanfall 2 (2016)
| Low, 1280×720 | 14.40 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 10.50 |
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
| Low, 1280×720 | 24.45 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 21.30 |
Civilization VI (2016)
| Low, 1024×768 | 12. 20 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 5.20 |
Mirror’s Edge Catalyst (2016)
| Low, 1280×720 | 10.50 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 6.10 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
| Low, 1024×768 | 7.10 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 4.20 |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
| Low, 1024×768 | 15.30 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 8.90 |
Anno 2205 (2015)
| Low, 1024×768 | 10.80 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 6.90 |
World of Warships (2015)
| Low, 1366×768 | 18.40 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 16.20 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
| Low, 1280×720 | 28.65 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 18.25 |
Dirt Rally (2015)
| Low, 1024×768 | 41. 50 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 12.50 |
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | 12.10 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 7.60 |
Alien: Isolation (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | 18.90 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 13.60 |
Sims 4 (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | 77.50 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 19.60 |
Thief (2014)
| Low, 1024×768 | 6.00 |
Battlefield 4 (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 16.50 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 12.50 |
| High, 1366×768 | 8.30 |
BioShock Infinite (2013)
| Low, 1280×720 | 19.95 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 11.40 |
| High, 1366×768 | 9. 60 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
| Low, 1024×768 | 27.80 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 12.80 |
| High, 1366×768 | 9.50 |
Diablo III (2012)
| Low, 1024×768 | 32.00 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 19.10 |
| High, 1366×768 | 14.40 |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
| Low, 1280×720 | 21.80 |
| Medium, 1366×768 | 10.40 |
| High, 1366×768 | 6.50 |
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
| Low, 1024×768 | 35.40 |
| High, 1366×768 | 14.70 |
Processors with Intel HD Graphics 405
| CPU | Type | Codename | Release date | Cores count | Max frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Pentium N3710 | Mobile | Braswell | 1 April 2016 | 4 | 2. 56 GHz |
| Intel Atom x7-Z8750 | Mobile | Cherry Trail | 1 April 2016 | 4 | 2.56 GHz |
Specifications (specs)
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | Braswell GT1 |
| Launch date | 1 April 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1551 |
| Type | Laptop |
| Boost clock speed | 700 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 213. 1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 13.32 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million |
|
|
|
| Display Connectors | No outputs |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4. 4 |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit |
Overview Intel HD Graphics 405
The Intel HD 405 is an integrated graphics chip built into the low-performance dual-core processors of the Braswell generation. Differs in very low productivity and very modest parameters.
Specifications Intel HD 405
The characteristics of this video card can only be called deplorable. Only 16 unified processors are responsible for the operation of the graphics adapter, the chip’s operating frequency reaches a very modest value of 700MHz. The actual frequency of operation may differ far from the best.
The amount of video card memory directly depends on the amount of RAM installed on the motherboard, as well as the settings made in the BIOS. And given that the HD 405 is installed in weak processors on stripped-down motherboards, a large amount of RAM is unlikely to be allocated.
Usually the frequency of the RAM directly affects the speed of the integrated video card, but in this case it is not. It makes no sense to install expensive RAM strips, they will practically not give an increase in speed. The only thing worth worrying about is the dual-channel mode of the RAM. In this case, the bus width will be 128 bits (in single-channel mode, the bus operates at 64 bits).
While the HD 405 has support for DirectX 11.2, OpenGL 4.4, OpenCL 2.0 and Intel Quick Sync, it’s all shattered by the poor performance of the graphics card, which is unable to unleash the potential of these APIs.
Overclocking for Intel HD 405 is not available, you can’t even dream about it. Even raising the frequency of the RAM will not give practically anything, and you will not be allowed to overclock the frequency of the graphics chip itself.
What is the Intel HD 405 suitable for?
For office PCs that don’t require too much graphics performance, the Intel HD 405 is ideal.
The performance of the video card is more than enough for office applications or Internet surfing, and its low power consumption and heat dissipation will save on the power supply.
The graphics chip is not suitable for watching movies. It will cope quite well with HD or FullHD resolution, the video sequence will not slow down, there should not be frame skipping either. But with the increasingly popular 4K resolution, the situation is much worse. The specification for the video card indicates support for decoding video in this resolution, but the performance of the HD 405 is not enough for this, which will cause movies to slow down or completely freeze.
Owners of this integrated graphics chip will not be able to play new games. You’ll be lucky if you can find at least a few modern projects, which games will run on Intel HD 405. Support for DirectX 11 and the latest OpenGL version of the latest version will not help here, the video card has too weak technical characteristics.
Older games are a little better, at least they will be able to run without noticeable brakes. But here problems may arise with the fact that some games categorically refuse to work on old integrated video cards.
In professional applications, the Intel HD 405 is a complete mess. Such tasks are affected not only by the low performance of the graphics chip, but also by the terrible characteristics of the processors into which the HD 405 is installed. The graphics card software is easy to install and does not require any special skills from users. The user just needs to download the installation package, run it and perform all the steps specified in the program.
Updating the driver package should also not cause problems, it can be done using the Intel settings. If the update through the Intel settings is not available for some reason, you can go to the official website and manually download the latest driver for Windows.
There are two drivers under Linux, both of which are not of good quality.
A free driver developed by third-party users does not need to be installed or updated by yourself, but it is not able to fully reveal an already weak video card.
Proprietary driver needs to be installed by yourself and only works on some distributions. Such a driver works better than its free counterpart, but installing or updating it may cause some problems in the operating system.
Comparison with discrete adapters
When compared with discrete graphics cards, the Intel HD 405 will not be in a winning situation. Any modern video card will be more powerful than this integrated solution.
HD Graphics 405 [in 6 benchmarks]
HD Graphics 405
- PCIe 3.0 x1 interface
- Core frequency 320
- Video memory size System Shared
- Memory type System Shared
- System Shared Memory Frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
Intel started HD Graphics 405 sales 1 April 2016.
This is Gen. 8 and 14 nm manufacturing process, primarily designed for office use.
In terms of compatibility, this is a PCIe 3.0 x1 card. Power consumption — 6 W.
It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of
1.26%
from the leader, which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
HD
Graphics 405
vs
GeForce RTX
4090
General information
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the HD Graphics 405, as well as when sales started and cost at the time.
| Performance rating |
| Number of Stream Processors | 16 | out of 18432 (AD102) |
Compatibility and dimensions
Information on HD Graphics 405 compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For laptop video cards, this is the estimated size of the laptop, the bus and the connection connector, if the video card is connected through the connector, and not soldered on the motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
RAM
Parameters of the memory installed on HD Graphics 405 — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.
| Memory type | System memory used | |
| Maximum memory |
Video outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on HD Graphics 405.
As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
| Video connectors | No outputs |
API support
APIs supported by HD Graphics 405, including their versions.
Benchmark tests
These are the results of HD Graphics 405 rendering performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest video card at the moment.
Overall benchmark performance
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
HD Graphics 405
1.26
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark.
It loads the graphics card with two scenes, one of which shows a girl running away from some kind of military base located in a sea cave, and the other of a space fleet attacking defenseless planet. Support for 3DMark Vantage was discontinued in April 2017 and it is now recommended to use the Time Spy benchmark instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
HD Graphics 405
2081
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is Futuremark’s legacy DirectX 11 benchmark. He used four tests based on two scenes: one is several submarines exploring a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All tests make extensive use of volumetric lighting and tessellation and, despite being run at 1280×720, are relatively heavy. Support for 3DMark 11 ended in January 2020 and is now being replaced by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
HD Graphics 405
473
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is a legacy benchmark that uses DirectX 11 feature level 10, used to test home PCs and low-end laptops.
It displays several scenes of some strange teleportation device launching spaceships into the unknown at a fixed resolution of 1280×720. As with the Ice Storm benchmark, it was deprecated in January 2020 and 3DMark Night Raid is now recommended instead.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
HD Graphics 405
2113
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Benchmark coverage: 14%
HD Graphics 405
238
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests showing a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature that appears to be made of lava. Using resolution 1920×1080, Fire Strike shows quite realistic graphics and is quite demanding on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
HD Graphics 405
255
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of the 3DMark package.
Ice Storm has been used to measure the performance of entry-level laptops and Windows-based tablets. It uses DirectX 11 feature level 9to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280×720 resolution. Support for Ice Storm ended in January 2020, now the developers recommend using Night Raid instead.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
HD Graphics 405
23763
Game tests
FPS in popular games on HD Graphics 405, as well as compliance with system requirements. Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests.
High Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1-2 |
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1-2 | |
| Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 1-2 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 1-2 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1-2 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1-2 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 1-2 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1-2 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1-2 | |
| Hitman 3 | 1-2 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1-2 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1-2 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1-2 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1-2 |
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1-2 | |
| Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 1-2 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 1-2 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1-2 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1-2 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 1-2 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1-2 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1-2 | |
| Hitman 3 | 1-2 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1-2 | |
| Metro Exodus | 1-2 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1-2 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1-2 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1-2 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1-2 |
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1-2 | |
| Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 1-2 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 1-2 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1-2 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 1-2 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1-2 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1-2 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1-2 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1-2 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1-2 | |
| Hitman 3 | 1-2 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1-2 | |
| Metro Exodus | 1-2 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1-2 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1-2 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1-2 |
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1-2 | |
| Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 1-2 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 1-2 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1-2 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 1-2 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1-2 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1-2 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1-2 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1-2 | |
| Hitman 3 | 1-2 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1-2 | |
| Metro Exodus | 1-2 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1-2 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1-2 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1-2 |
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1-2 | |
| Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | 1-2 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 1-2 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1-2 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 1-2 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1-2 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1-2 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1-2 |
Relative capacity
Overall performance of HD Graphics 405 compared to its nearest competitor in notebook graphics cards.
NVIDIA GeForce 710M
101.59
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
100.79
AMD Radeon HD 7570M
100
Intel HD Graphics 405
100
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
99.21
AMD Radeon HD 8410G
97.62
AMD Radeon R5 M240
96.83
Other video cards
Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
GeForce
710M
Compare
Radeon R7
M260
Compare
UHD
Graphics 605
Compare
Radeon R5
M240
Compare
GeForce GT
720M
Compare
Radeon HD
8610G
Compare
Recommended Processors
According to our statistics, these processors are most often used with HD Graphics 405.