Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/pentium-n3700-vs-celeron-n3060%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
Radeon RX
580
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
EPYC
7h22
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/pentium-n3700-vs-celeron-n3060%23technologies
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
Radeon RX
580
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
EPYC
7h22
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Intel Pentium N3700 vs Celeron N3060:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Pentium N3700
Intel Celeron N3060
Which is better: 4-core Intel Pentium N3700 at 1. 6 GHz or Celeron N3060 with 2 cores at 1.6 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 14nm laptop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Pentium N3700
11
Celeron N3060
11
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nuclei 9 are involved0003
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium N3700
- Has 2 more physical cores
Reasons to choose Intel Celeron N3060
- Appeared 10 months later than rival
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Passmark CPU (single core)
Pentium N3700
+2%
634
Celeron N3060
624
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Pentium N3700
+89%
1241
Celeron N3060
655
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Pentium N3700
+7%
228
Celeron N3060
213
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Pentium N3700
+101%
785
Celeron N3060
390
Add your Cinebench R23 results
Specifications
List of full specifications of Intel Pentium N3700 and Celeron N3060
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Release date | March 30, 2015 | January 10, 2016 |
| Type | For laptop | For laptop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Model number | N3700 | N3060 |
| Integrated graphics | HD Graphics | HD Graphics 400 |
Processor
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| threads | 4 | 2 |
| Frequency | 1. 6 GHz |
1.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Level 1 cache | 96KB (per core) | 48KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 2MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | — | 2MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Socket | BGA-1170 | BGA-1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6W | 6W |
| Critical temperature | 90°C | 90°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 400 |
| Boost GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 600 MHz |
Memory support
| Memory type | DDR3L-1600 | DDR3L-1600 |
Max. size |
8 GB | 8 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | No |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Pentium N3700 | Site Intel Celeron N3060 |
| PCI Express version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 4 | 4 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Pentium N3700
7 (77.8%)
Celeron N3060
2 (22.2%)
voted in total:
90,000 comparison Intel Celeron N3060 and Intel Pentium N3700
Comparative analysis of the Intel Celeron N3060 and Intel Pentium N3700 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Graphics API Support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
9times greater: 69.165 vs 11.663
107 vs 1.706 | Max frequency | 2.48 GHz vs 2.40 GHz |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.598 vs 2.632 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 69.165 vs 11.663 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.449 vs 0.127 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
4.417 vs 0.51 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.107 vs 1.706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 1431 vs 1298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 2267 vs 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1431 vs 1298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 2267 vs 2070 |
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium N3700
- 2 more cores, the ability to run more applications simultaneously: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- PassMark — Single thread mark performance about 2% higher: 634 vs 623
- PassMark performance — CPU mark about 89% more: 1239 vs 655
- GFXBench 4.
0 performance — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) about 14% more: 569 vs 498 - GFXBench 4.0 performance — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) about 14% more: 569vs 498
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 634 vs 623 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1239 vs 655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 569 vs 498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 569 vs 498 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N3060
CPU 2: Intel Pentium N3700
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
| Name | Intel Celeron N3060 | Intel Pentium N3700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 623 | 634 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 655 | 1239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.598 | 2.632 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
69.165 | 11.663 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.449 | 0.127 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.417 | 0.51 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.107 | 1.706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 498 | 569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 1431 | 1298 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
2267 | 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 498 | 569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1431 | 1298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 2267 | 2070 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 212 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 686 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Celeron N3060 | Intel Pentium N3700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Braswell | Braswell |
| Issue date | April 1, 2015 | April 1, 2015 |
| Price at first issue date | $107 | $161 |
| Place in the ranking | 1969 | 2405 |
| Processor Number | N3060 | N3700 |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor N Series |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Applicability | Mobile | Mobile |
| Price now | $444. 78 |
|
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 1.22 | |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
| Level 2 cache | 2MB | 2MB |
| Process | 14nm | 14nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 90°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.48 GHz | 2. 40 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | 8GB | 8GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Number of execution units | 12 | 16 |
| Graphics base frequency | 320 MHz | 400MHz |
| Maximum GPU clock | 600MHz | 700MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Video memory size | 8GB | 8GB |
| Integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 400 | Intel HD Graphics |
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 | 3 |
| WiDi support | ||
| DirectX | 11. 1 |
Yes |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | Yes |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 25mm x 27mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4W | 4W |
| Supported sockets | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 4 | 4 |
| Maximum number of SATA 6 Gb/s ports | 2 | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | 5 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.
|