Intel pentium g860 vs i3: Intel Core i3-3220 vs Pentium G860

Intel Pentium G860 vs Intel Core i3-3220

Summary

  • Intel Pentium G860

    100%

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    138%

Relative performance

  • Intel Pentium G860

    100%

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    120%

Relative performance

  • Intel Pentium G860

    100%

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    147%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Intel Pentium G860
None
Reasons to consider Intel Core i3-3220
Much higher single threaded performance (around 20% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 47% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
Around 38% higher average synthetic performance.

Gaming

HWBench recommends Intel Core i3-3220

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.


Productivity

HWBench recommends Intel Core i3-3220

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

Features
Intel Pentium G860 Intel Core i3-3220
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
AES-NI
Hyper-Threading
TXT

Architecture
Intel Pentium G860 Intel Core i3-3220
Architecture Intel_SandyBridge vs Intel_IvyBridge
Market Desktop vs Desktop
Memory Support DDR3 vs DDR3
Codename Sandy Bridge vs Ivy Bridge
Release Date Sep 2011 vs Sep 2012

Cores
Intel Pentium G860 Intel Core i3-3220
Cores 2 vs 2
Threads 2 vs 4
SMPs 1 vs 1
Integrated Graphics Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) vs Intel HD 2500

Cache
Intel Pentium G860 Intel Core i3-3220
L1 Cache 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache 256 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache 3072 KB (shared) vs 3072 KB (shared)

Physical
Intel Pentium G860 Intel Core i3-3220
Socket Intel Socket 1155 vs Intel Socket 1155
Max Case Temp unknown vs 65°C
Package FC-LGA10 vs FC-LGA12C
Die Size 131mm² vs 94mm²
Process 32 nm vs 22 nm

Performance
Intel Pentium G860 Intel Core i3-3220
Cpu Frequency 3000 MHz vs 3300 MHz
Turbo Clock none vs none
Base Clock 100 MHz vs 100 MHz
Voltage unknown vs unknown
TDP 65 W vs 55 W
  • Intel Pentium G860

    3000 points

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    3399 points

Points — higher is better

  • Intel Pentium G860

    6000 points

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    8157 points

Points — higher is better

  • Intel Pentium G860

    3065

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    4019

points — higher is better

  • Intel Pentium G860

    3964

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    4626

points — higher is better

  • Intel Pentium G860

    7695

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    10193

points — higher is better

  • Intel Pentium G860

    1. 2

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    1.38

points — higher is better

  • Intel Pentium G860

    2.34

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    3.31

points — higher is better

  • Intel Pentium G860

    13.1

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    11.6

seconds — lower is better

  • Intel Pentium G860

    23.6

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    14.66

seconds — lower is better

  • Intel Pentium G860

    1655

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    2695

MB/s — higher is better

  • Intel Pentium G860

    70.31

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    98.55

FPS — higher is better

  • Intel Pentium G860

    12.69

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    18.82

FPS — higher is better

  • Intel Pentium G860

    0.23

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    0.32

GB/s

  • Intel Pentium G860

    0. 18

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    0.29

GB/s

  • Intel Pentium G860

    0.1

  • Intel Core i3-3220

    0.17

GB/s

  • Intel Pentium G860 (simulated)

    98.92

  • Intel Core i3-3220 (simulated)

    117.62

points — higher is better

  • Intel Pentium G860 (simulated)

    213.64

  • Intel Core i3-3220 (simulated)

    314.44

points — higher is better

Intel Pentium G860 vs Intel Core i3-550


Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium G860 and Intel Core i3-550 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s).

Intel Pentium G860

Buy on Amazon


vs

Intel Core i3-550

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium G860

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 95% higher maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16.38 GB
  • Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 73 Watt
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1384 vs 1341
  • Around 10% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 524 vs 478
  • Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.683 vs 0. 529
  • Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.163 vs 0.156








Launch date 15 September 2011 vs May 2010
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 16.38 GB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 73 Watt
PassMark — Single thread mark 1384 vs 1341
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 524 vs 478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.683 vs 0.529
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0. 163 vs 0.156

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-550

  • 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
  • Around 7% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz
  • Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 72.6°C vs 69.1°C
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 1595 vs 1434
  • Around 12% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1061 vs 947
  • Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 31.203 vs 21.937
  • Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.358 vs 2.336










Number of threads 4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 3. 2 GHz vs 3 GHz
Maximum core temperature 72.6°C vs 69.1°C
L2 cache 256 KB (per core) vs 256 KB
L3 cache 4096 KB (shared) vs 3072 KB
PassMark — CPU mark 1595 vs 1434
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 1061 vs 947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 31.203 vs 21.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2.358 vs 2.336

Compare benchmarks


CPU 1: Intel Pentium G860
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-550









PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2

21.937

31.203

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2












Name Intel Pentium G860 Intel Core i3-550
PassMark — Single thread mark 1384 1341
PassMark — CPU mark 1434 1595
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 524 478
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 947 1061
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.683 0.529
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 21.937 31.203
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.163 0.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2.336 2.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

0.842

Compare specifications (specs)
















































Intel Pentium G860 Intel Core i3-550
Architecture codename Sandy Bridge Clarkdale
Launch date 15 September 2011 May 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $75 $101
Place in performance rating 2255 2343
Price now $29. 99 $179.95
Processor Number G860 i3-550
Series Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Value for money (0-100) 26.93 4.63
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
64 bit support
Base frequency 3. 00 GHz 3.20 GHz
Bus Speed 5 GT/s DMI 2.5 GT/s DMI
Die size 131 mm 81 mm2
L1 cache 128 KB 64 KB (per core)
L2 cache 256 KB 256 KB (per core)
L3 cache 3072 KB 4096 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 32 nm
Maximum core temperature 69. 1°C 72.6°C
Maximum frequency 3 GHz 3.2 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Number of threads 2 4
Transistor count 504 Million 382 million
VID voltage range

0.6500V-1.4000V
Max memory channels 2 2
Maximum memory bandwidth 21 GB/s 21 GB/s
Maximum memory size 32 GB 16. 38 GB
Supported memory types DDR3 1066/1333 DDR3 1066/1333
Graphics base frequency 850 MHz 733 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency 1.10 GHz
Graphics max frequency 1.1 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics Intel HD Graphics Intel HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 2
Wireless Display (WiDi) support
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 37. 5mm x 37.5mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported FCLGA1155 FCLGA1156
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 73 Watt
PCI Express revision 2.0 2.0
Max number of PCIe lanes

16
PCIe configurations

1×16, 2×8
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Idle States
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE4.

2024 © All rights reserved