Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4010U
Comparing technical specs and benchmarks
VS
Intel Pentium J2900 22 nm — 2.41 GHz DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
Intel Core i3-4010U 22 nm — 1.70 GHz DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
Intel Pentium J2900
Intel Core i3-4010U
Intel Pentium J2900 vs. Intel Core i3-4010U
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In comparison between Intel Pentium J2900 and Intel Core i3-4010U, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.
4 / 4
CPU Cores / Threads
2 / 4
No
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
2.41 GHz
Frequency
1.70 GHz
2.67 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
No turbo
no data
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
No turbo
2. 67 GHz
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
no data
Intel Pentium J2900 vs. Intel Core i3-4010U
CPU generation and family
4
CPU Cores
2
Market price
ca. 195 $
7
Generation
7.5
Intel Pentium J2900 vs. Intel Core i3-4010U
Internal Graphics
Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Pentium J2900 to Intel Core i3-4010U across a built-in video card.
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
GPU name
Intel HD Graphics 4400
0.69 GHz
GPU frequency
0.20 GHz
0.90 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
1.00 GHz
4
Execution units
20
32
Shader
160
2
Max. displays
3
7
Generation
7.5
11.2
Direct X
11.1
22 nm
Technology
22 nm
Q3/2013
Release date
Q2/2013
Intel Pentium J2900 vs.
Intel Core i3-4010U
Hardware codec support
Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.
No
h365 8bit
No
No
h365 10bit
No
Decode / Encode
h364
Decode / Encode
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
Decode / Encode
AVC
Decode / Encode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode
JPEG
Decode
Intel Pentium J2900 vs. Intel Core i3-4010U
Memory & PCIe
Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.
2.0
PCIe version
2.0
4
PCIe lanes
12
DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
Memory type
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
2
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
No
No
AES-NI
Yes
Intel Pentium J2900 vs.
Intel Core i3-4010U
Thermal Management
High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Pentium J2900 and Intel Core i3-4010U have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.
10 W
TDP
15 W
—
TDP up
—
—
TDP down
—
105 °C
Tjunction max.
—
Intel Pentium J2900 vs. Intel Core i3-4010U
Technical details
Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.
2.00 MB
L3-Cache
3.00 MB
Bay Trail
Architecture
Haswell
22 nm
Technology
22 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
BGA 1170
Socket
BGA 1168
Q4/2013
Release date
Q3/2013
Intel Pentium J2900 vs.
Intel Core i3-4010U
Devices using this processor
In completing the comparison between Intel Pentium J2900 and Intel Core i3-4010U, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.
Unknown
Used in
Unknown
Popular comparisons with these processors
| 1. |
AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Core i3-4010U |
|
| 2. |
Intel Celeron 6305 vs. Intel Core i3-4010U |
|
| 3. |
Intel Core i3-4010U vs. AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|
| 4. |
Intel Core i3-4010U vs. Intel Core i7-9700T |
|
5.
|
Intel Core i3-4010U vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
| 6. |
Intel Core i7-4750HQ vs. Intel Core i3-4010U |
|
| 7. |
Intel Core i3-4010U vs. AMD Phenom II X4 840T |
List of comparisons between Intel Pentium J2900 and Intel Core i3-4000
|
|
|
|
|
List of comparisons between Intel Pentium J2900 and Intel Core i3-4000
List of comparisons of technical characteristics between the processor Intel Pentium J2900 and the processors group Intel Core i3-4000, with also the respective performance in the benchmarks. Click on one of the links to access the desired comparison.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Comparisons:
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4370 | 4 | 4 | 2. 41 |
2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3800 | 3800 | 4000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4360 | 4 | 4 | 2.41 | 2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3700 | 3700 | 4000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4340 | 4 | 4 | 2.41 | 2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3600 | 3600 | 4000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4330 | 4 | 4 | 2. 41 |
2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3500 | 3500 | 4000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4170 | 4 | 4 | 2.41 | 2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3700 | 3700 | 3000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4160T | 4 | 4 | 2.41 | 2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3100 | 3100 | 3000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4160 | 4 | 4 | 2. 41 |
2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3600 | 3600 | 3000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4150T | 4 | 4 | 2.41 | 2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3000 | 3000 | 3000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4150 | 4 | 4 | 2.41 | 2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3500 | 3500 | 3000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4130T | 4 | 4 | 2. 41 |
2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2900 | 2900 | 3000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4130 | 4 | 4 | 2.41 | 2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3400 | 3400 | 3000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4100M | 4 | 4 | 2.41 | 2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2500 | 2500 | 3000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4030U | 4 | 4 | 2. 41 |
2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1900 | 1900 | 3000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4020Y | 4 | 4 | 2.41 | 2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1500 | 1500 | 3000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4010U | 4 | 4 | 2.41 | 2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1700 | 1700 | 3000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4005U | 4 | 4 | 2. 41 |
2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1700 | 1700 | 3000 |
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Intel Core i3-4000M | 4 | 4 | 2.41 | 2.66 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2400 | 2400 | 3000 |
Intel Pentium J2900 vs. Intel Core i5-7500
Intel Pentium J2900
The Intel Pentium J2900 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 2.67 GHz base 2.67 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 10 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1170 CPU socket. This version includes 2.
00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 105 °C degrees C. In particular, Bay Trail Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT. The product was launched on Q4/2013
Intel Core i5-7500
The Intel Core i5-7500 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.80 GHz base 3.60 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1151 CPU socket. This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2400 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Kaby Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2017
Intel Pentium J2900
Intel Core i5-7500
Compare Detail
| 2.41 GHz | Frequency | 3. 40 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 2.67 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.80 GHz |
| 2.67 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.60 GHz |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
|
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) |
GPU |
Intel HD Graphics 630 |
| 0.90 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.10 GHz |
| 22 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| 0.90 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.10 GHz |
| 11.2 | DirectX Version | 12 |
| 2 | Max. displays | 3 |
| DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM | Memory | DDR4-2400 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
2. 00 MB |
L3 Cache | 6.00 MB |
| 2.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 4 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| 22 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| BGA 1170 | Socket | LGA 1151 |
| 10 W | TDP | 65 W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q4/2013 | Release date | Q1/2017 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software.
The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.
5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
| Intel Pentium J2900 | Intel Core i5-7500 | |
| 10 W | Max TDP | 65 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
Comparison of Intel Pentium J2900 and Intel Core i3-4100U
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium J2900 and Intel Core i3-4100U processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Graphics API Support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization, Image Quality in the chart.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames /s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Pentium J2900
versus
Intel Core i3-4100U
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium J2900
- Newer processor, 4 month(s) difference in release dates at the same time:
- more ability to run 2 more cores 2
- About 48% more clock speed: 2.66 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- About 5% more maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- L1 cache is about 75% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L2 cache is 4 times (s) larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Approximately 50% less power consumption : 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
| Release Date | November 1, 2013 vs June 4, 2013 | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 | |
| Maximum frequency | 2. 66 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
|
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C | |
| Level 1 cache | 224 KB vs 128 KB | |
| Level 2 cache | 2 MB vs 512 KB | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Pentium J2900
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-4100U
| Name | Intel Pentium J2900 | Intel Core i3-4100U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 732 | |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1238 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
0.41 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 42.287 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.547 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.03 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 1247 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 1247 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Pentium J2900 | Intel Core i3-4100U | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Bay Trail | Haswell |
| Production date | November 1, 2013 | June 4, 2013 |
| Price at first issue date | $94 | |
| Place in the ranking | 2424 | not rated |
| Processor Number | J2900 | i3-4100U |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor J Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
| Applicability | Desktop | Mobile |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2. 41 GHz |
1.80 GHz |
| Level 1 cache | 224KB | 128KB |
| Level 2 cache | 2MB | 512KB |
| Process | 22nm | 22nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.66 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Crystal area | 118mm | |
| Level 3 cache | 3072KB | |
| Number of transistors | 1400 million | |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21. 3 GB/s |
25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 8GB | 16GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
| Graphics base frequency | 688MHz | 200MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 896MHz | 1.00 GHz |
| Maximum GPU clock | 896MHz | 1GHz |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 |
| Device ID | 0x416 | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | ||
| Video memory size | 2 GB | |
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 2 | 3 |
| WiDi support | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| DirectX | 11. 2 |
11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm X 27mm | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm |
| Supported sockets | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1168 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 4 | 12 |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | 4 |
| PCI Express revision | 2. 0 |
2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | X4, X2, X1 | 4×1, 2×4 |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | 4 |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Embedded IDE | ||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Maximum number of SATA 6 Gb/s ports | 4 | |
| Support PCI | ||
| UART | ||
| Anti-Theft Technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage Technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
| General Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
|
| Intel® Active Management Technology (AMT) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® ME Firmware Version | 9.5 | |
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Matrix Storage | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| Maximum resolution via DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4 |
[email protected] | |
| Maximum resolution via VGA | N/A |
Compare Intel Pentium J2900 and Intel Core i3-2120T
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium J2900 and Intel Core i3-2120T processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Graphics API Support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames /s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.
0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s).
Intel Pentium J2900
versus
Intel Core i3-2120T
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium J2900
- Newer processor, release date difference 2 year(s) 2 month(s)
- Approximately 2% more clock speed: 2.66 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- Approximately 62% more maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 65.0°C
- A newer manufacturing process for the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with less power consumption: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- L1 cache is about 75% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L2 cache in 4 times more means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- 3.
5 times less power consumption: 10 Watt vs 35 Watt - Performance in the CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) benchmark by about 41% more: 42.287 vs 29.917
9019 more, ability to run more cores applications simultaneously: 4 vs 2
| Release date | November 1, 2013 vs September 2011 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.66 GHz vs 2.6 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 65.0°C |
| Process | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
| Level 1 cache | 224 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 2 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 35 Watt |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
42.287 vs 29.917 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1144 vs 732 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1486 vs 1238 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.611 vs 0.41 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Pentium J2900
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-2120T
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium J2900 | Intel Core i3-2120T |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 732 | 1144 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1238 | 1486 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
0.41 | 1.611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 42.287 | 29.917 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.547 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.03 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 1247 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 1247 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 466 | |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1038 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
0.213 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Pentium J2900 | Intel Core i3-2120T | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Bay Trail | Sandy Bridge |
| Production date | November 1, 2013 | September 2011 |
| Price at first issue date | $94 | $50 |
| Place in the ranking | 2424 | 2200 |
| Processor Number | J2900 | i3-2120T |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor J Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $113 | |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 8. 24 |
|
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.41 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Level 1 cache | 224KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 2MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| Process | 22nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 65.0°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.66 GHz | 2. 6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Crystal area | 131mm | |
| Level 3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | |
| Number of transistors | 504 million | |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21. 3 GB/s |
21 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 8GB | 32GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | DDR3 1066/1333 |
| Graphics base frequency | 688MHz | 650MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 896MHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Maximum GPU clock | 896 MHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 2000 |
| Device ID | 0x102 | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | ||
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 2 | 2 |
| WiDi support | ||
| DirectX | 11. 2 |
|
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm X 27mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Supported sockets | FCBGA1170 | FCLGA1155 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 4 | 16 |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2. 0 |
2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | X4, X2, X1 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | |
| Anti-Theft Technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage Technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
| Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
|
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Compare Intel Core i3 3240T and Intel Pentium J2900
Intel Core i3 3240T
2.