Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 vs Intel Core i7-1165G7 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 vs Intel Core i7-1165G7
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Intel Core i7-1165G7 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Ultrabook | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Penryn | Willow Cove | ||||||
| Core name | Yorkfield | Tiger Lake-UP3 | ||||||
| Family | Core 2 Quad 9000 | Core i7-1100 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
BX80569Q9650, |
FH8069004530104, |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2008 | Q3 2020 | ||||||
| Lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm SuperFin | ||||||
| Transistors | 820. 000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,0 GHz | 1,2 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | — | 4,7 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores |
4 Cores 4 Threads @ 3,0 GHz |
4 Cores 8 Threads @ 1,2 / 4,7 GHz |
||||||
| Cache memory | 12 MB | 12 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR3-1333 |
DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 |
||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 95 W | 28 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | — | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 96 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 768 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 1300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 1. 690 GFLOPS |
||||||
| Socket | LGA775 | BGA1449 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 775 Motherboard | — | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 71.4°C | 100°C | ||||||
| AI accelerator |
— |
Gaussian & Neural Accelerator, |
||||||
| Crypto engine |
— |
AES New Instructions |
||||||
| Security |
Trusted Execution Technology, |
OS Guard, |
||||||
| Max display resolution |
— |
4096 x 2304@60Hz (HDMI), |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 257 | 428 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 940 | 2. 357 |
||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 86 | 215 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 337 | 814 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 180 | 568 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 717 | 2.042 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 450 | 1.502 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 1.744 | 4.723 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.281 | 2.205 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 2.368 | 10. 493 |
||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 4 single core |
2.162 | 6.367 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
6.263 | 20.188 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
436 | 1.421 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
1.361 | 4.598 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
73,64 GFLOPS | 316,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
66 pts / W | 721 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-1165G7 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i7-1165G7 is less. The Intel Core i7-1165G7 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
428 2.357 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 |
257 940 |
In single core, the difference is 67%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 151%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
215 814 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 |
86 337 |
In single core, the difference is 150%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 142%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
568 2.042 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 |
180 717 |
In single core, the difference is 216%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 185%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
1.502 4.723 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 |
450 1.744 |
In single core, the difference is 234%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 171%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
2.205 10.493 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 |
1.281 2.368 |
In single core, the difference is 72%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 343%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
6.367 20.188 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 |
2.162 6.263 |
In single core, the difference is 194%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 222%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
6.  87719.876 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 |
2.677 7.789 |
In single core, the difference is 157%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 155%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
1.  4214.598 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 |
436 1.361 |
In single core, the difference is 226%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 238%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
1.420 4.422 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 |
471 1.427 |
In single core, the difference is 201%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 210%.
On macOS:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
889 3.791 |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 |
498 1.  481 |
In single core, the difference is 79%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 156%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Equivalence:
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 AMD equivalentIntel Core i7-1165G7 AMD equivalent
CPU Specs, Prices, and FPS in Games
Refine results to filter 679 processors by performance, release date, price, and value. Click on a CPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.
Calculation Parameters
Graphics Card
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Graphics Preset
Extreme
Upscaling
Native
Sort By
Popularity
Filters
Performance Rating
Value Rating
CPU Type
Desktop
25
Mobile
0
Server
0
Found 679 CPUs.
Popularity
Processor
Performance
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Apr 20th, 2022
Performance Rating
Ryzen 5 5600X
Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
Ryzen 7 5800X
Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
Ryzen 7 5700G
Apr 13th, 2021
Performance Rating
Core i7-12700K
Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
Ryzen 5 5600G
Apr 13th, 2021
Performance Rating
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Performance Rating
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Performance Rating
Ryzen 5 5600
Apr 20th, 2022
Performance Rating
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
Ryzen 5 5500
Apr 4th, 2022
Performance Rating
Ryzen 7 5700X
Apr 4th, 2022
Performance Rating
Ryzen 7 7700X
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
Core i5-12600K
Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
Core i5-13600K
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
Ryzen 5 7600
Jan 14th, 2023
Performance Rating
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
Ryzen 9 7950X
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
Core i7-12700KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Performance Rating
Ryzen 5 3600
Jul 7th, 2019
Performance Rating
Core i5-13600KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Performance Rating
- Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- .
.. - 26
- 27
- 28
- Next
Compare Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 vs Intel Core i7-7820EQ
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Intel Core i7-7820EQ |
|---|---|
| Two CPU models from intel | |
| Two CPU models belong to the same Core class | |
| Two processors were released around the same time period | |
| CPUs have similarities in terms of the number of cores: 4 cores | |
| The clock frequency of these processors is the same and equals 3000 MHz | |
| 900 16 Both processors support 64-bit architecture | |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Intel Core i7-7820EQ |
|---|---|
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 belongs to the Core 2 Quad | |
| The core architecture of the Core 2 Quad Q9650 processor is called Yorkfield | The core architecture of the Core i7-7820EQ processor is called Kaby Lake-H |
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 is a desktop processor | Core i7-7820EQ is an embedded processor |
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 runs on LGA775 socket | Intel Core i7-7820EQ runs on BGA1440 socket |
Core 2 Quad Q9650 is significantly inferior in terms of the number of threads, 4 vs. 4 |
|
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 is less technologically advanced, since its process technology is significantly larger and equal to 45 nanometers Quad Q9650 | |
| The Core 2 Quad Q9650 will need more powerful cooling, because its TDP is 95 watts | W |
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 has a maximum temperature threshold of 71.4 °C. Slightly inferior to Core i7-7820EQ | Core i7-7820EQ’s maximum core temperature threshold is noticeably higher and equals 100 degrees. And this is undoubtedly a significant + |
| The L1 cache of the Core 2 Quad Q9650 CPU is significantly smaller compared to the Core i7-7820EQ and equals 128 Kilobytes | The L1 cache of the Core i7-7820EQ CPU is significantly larger compared to the Core 2 Quad Q965 0 and is 256 Kilobytes |
| The L2 cache of the CPU Core 2 Quad Q9650 is much larger compared to the Core i7-7820EQ and is equal to 12288 KB | The L2 cache of the CPU Core i7-7820EQ is much less than for Core 2 Quad Q9650 and equal to 1024 KB |
Comparison of instructions and technologies
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Intel Core i7-7820EQ | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EIST (Enhanced Intel SpeedStep) | Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Energy Saving Technology. | ||
| Stop Grant state | — | Energy saving status. | |
| Extended Stop Grant State | — | Energy Saving Status (Advanced Technology). | |
| Sleep state | — | Sleep state. | |
| Deep Sleep state | — | Deep sleep state. | |
| Deeper Sleep state | — | Deeper sleep state. |
|
| Extended HALT state | — | Extended stop state. | |
| HALT state | — | Stop status. | |
| Thermal Monitoring | — | Temperature monitoring. | |
| Idle States | — | Idle states. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Intel Core i7-7820EQ | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | Multimedia extensions. | ||
| SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | Processor streaming SIMD extension. |
||
| SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 2. | ||
| SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 3. | ||
| SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3) | Additional SIMD Extensions for Streaming 3. | ||
| EM64T (Extended Memory 64-bit Technology) | 64-bit extended memory technology. | ||
| NX (Execute disable bit) | Execution inhibit bit. | ||
| SSE4 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4) | — | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 4. | |
| AES (Intel Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions) | — | Command set extension. |
|
| AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions) | — | Command set extension. | |
| AVX 2.0 (Advanced Vector Extensions 2.0) | — | Command set extension 2.0. | |
| BMI1, BMI2 (Bit manipulation instructions sets) | — | X86 bit control command set. | |
| F16C (16-bit Floating-Point conversion) | — | 16-bit floating point conversion. | |
| FMA3 (Fused Multiply-Add 3) | — | Multiply Add with Round One (FMA3). | |
| SSE4.1 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4.1) | — | Processor Streaming SIMD 4.1 Extension. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Intel Core i7-7820EQ | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXT (Trusted Execution Technology) | Trusted execution technology. |
||
| MPX (Intel Memory Protection Extensions) | — | Memory protection extensions. | |
| SGX (Software Guard Extensions) | — | Intel Software Protection Extensions. | |
| EDB (Execute Disable Bit) | — | Execute trip bit. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Intel Core i7-7820EQ | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| VT-x (Virtualization technology) | Virtualization technology. | ||
| VT-d (Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O) | Directed I/O virtualization technology. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | Intel Core i7-7820EQ | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyper-Threading | Hyperthreading technology. | ||
| TSX (Transactional Synchronization Extensions) | — | Transactional synchronization extensions. | |
| Dynamic FSB frequency switching | — | Dynamic FSB switching. | |
| vPro | — | Intel Technology Suite, vPro is a marketing term. | |
| DBS (Demand Based Switching) | — | Switching on demand. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The main rating is calculated according to the formula, taking into account all indicators, such as — test results of all benchmarks, socket, frequency, year of release, instructions, architecture, number of cores and threads, technology , temperature data, and more. The results of the overall rating showed that the Core i7-7820EQ surpasses its rival Core 2 Quad Q9 in most parameters.650. The Core 2 Quad Q9650 barely scores 3207.2 points compared to its competitor.
PassMark CPU Mark
This is perhaps the most popular benchmark tester in RuNet. Almost all processors presented on our website have been tested in PassMark. The benchmark includes a large set of tools for a comprehensive evaluation of personal computer data, including the central processor. Diagnostics include compression, encryption, extended instruction checking, game physics calculations, floating point calculations, integer calculations, single-threaded and multi-threaded tests.
In particular, it is possible to compare the obtained indicators with other configurations in the database. Performance Test showed a clear advantage of the Core i7-7820EQ processor (7453 points) over the Core 2 Quad Q9650 (2372 points). The Core 2 Quad Q9650 with a score of 2372 clearly loses in this test.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
This benchmark for testing video cards and processors is morally obsolete today. The Single-Core version uses only one core and one thread for rendering. The test is carried out under the control of operating systems Mac OS X, Windows. It is possible to test many processor systems. The method of geometric optics is used — ray tracing. Released by MAXON, and based on the Cinema 4D 3D editor. The main performance testing mode is a photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, working with light, simulating global illumination, spatial light sources, multilevel reflections, and procedural shaders.
Cinebench 10 (32bit) Multi-thread test
Multi Core version is another test method in Cinebench R10, which already uses multi-thread and multi-core test method.
It is important to note that the possible number of threads in this version of the program is limited to sixteen.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-thread test
64-bit version of CINEBENCH R11.5 test, it has the ability to test the processor at 100%, including all threads and cores. It differs from previous versions of the program, 64 threads are used here. Testing the Core i7-7820EQ in the Cinebench benchmark version R11.5 gave 7.79points, this indicates a higher performance of this model. While the Core 2 Quad Q9650 scores 3.12, it is way behind its rival in this test.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Good old multifunctional Cinebench 11.5 from the Maxon team. In checks, the ray tracing process is still used, a highly detailed 3D space is rendered with a large number of crystalline and glass and translucent spheres. In this case, Single-Core tests are performed using one thread and one core. His tests are still relevant. The result of the check is the «frames per second» parameter.
The single-thread test results for the Core i7-7820EQ in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed high performance compared to the competitor, its score was 1.77 points. But the Core 2 Quad Q9 itself650 scoring 0.74 points in this test is far behind it.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Thread Cinebench 15 will load your system to the full, showing what it can do. All CPU cores and threads are used when rendering highly detailed 3D objects. Ideal for new multi-threaded CPUs from AMD and Intel. it is capable of using 256 computation threads. With a score of 708.16, the Core i7-7820EQ unequivocally scores higher in Cinebench 15’s Multi-Core test. While its competitor, the Core 2 Quad Q9The 650 is far behind with a score of 287.09 in the test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench R15 is the most modern tester from the Finnish company Maxon to date. In this version of the Single Core program, one thread is used for rendering.
A complex 3D scene is rendered with a large number of complex objects, light sources and reflections. Using this program, a system check is carried out: both CPU and video cards. For processors, the result of the calculation will be the value of PTS points, and for graphics adapters, the number of frames per second. FPS. The single-threaded test of the Core i7-7820EQ processor in the Cinebench R15 program shows its high performance, the result is 156.39points. Compared to it, its rival Core 2 Quad Q9650 fails this test with a score of 65.92 points.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
This is a 64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 test. It is cross-platform support for different OS and devices that makes Geekbench tests the most common today. In Geekbench 4, the 64-bit multi-core Core i7-7820EQ received a score of 15373, well above the Core 2 Quad Q9650. In this test, the Core 2 Quad Q9The 650 gets a very low score of 7448 compared to the Core i7-7820EQ.
Geekbench 4.
0 (64-bit) Single Thread
Geekbench 4’s latest single thread for testing home PCs and laptops. The program, like its earlier versions, can still be run on operating systems: Linux, Windows, Mac OS. The Single-Core test uses 1 thread. For the first time in this version of the program, mobile devices running Android and iOS are also supported. The Core i7-7820EQ scored higher in the Geekbench 4.0 single-thread test with a score of 4604. But its competitor Core 2 Quad Q9650 things are much worse — 2553 points.
Geekbench 3 (32bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-thread version of Geekbench 3 — can allow you to make a big «reliability» test of your PC and demonstrate the stability of your system.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded benchmark
The multi-platform Geekbench tester is often used to evaluate a Mac system, although it can work on both Windows and Linux. The basic purpose is to check the speed of the CPU. The 32-bit version of the program uses only one processor core and one thread.
Geekbench 2
Old version of Geekbench 2. In our archive you can find up to 200 processor models that have test data in this benchmark. To date, there are more recent options, the fourth and 5v.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In essence, this is a test in practice of system performance by transcoding HD files to H.264 format or the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. An ideal test for multi-core and multi-thread processors. The frame rate processed per second is the result of the check. This test is faster compared to Pass 2, since the rendering is performed at a constant speed. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Core i7-7820EQ model is significantly higher and is 194.12 FPS But the Core 2 Quad Q9650 did a poor job, its speed was 78.59 FPS.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the processing is already done at a non-constant rate.
You need to be aware that a very real task is being performed, and the x264 codec is used in a large number of video programs. The final result is also measured in frames per second. The output is a higher quality video file. For this reason, the results of the checks really assess the effectiveness of the system. When measuring the speed of video file compression by the Core i7-7820EQ processor in mpeg4 format, the result was 42.95 FPS Its rival Core 2 Quad Q9650 showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 17.25 FPS.
3DMark06 CPU
Benchmark program to evaluate the performance of the processor and video system. CPUs are tested in 2 ways: the game AI does pathfinding and another test simulates the game engine using PhysX. This benchmark is often used by fans to overclock the system and overclockers and gamers. Based on DirectX by the Finnish team Futuremark. The Core i7-7820EQ performed significantly faster in the pathfinding and game physics tests, and scores 9839.
05 points. The processor Core 2 Quad Q9650 coped worse with this task with 3919.41 points.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
We can say that almost 2 hundred processors on our Internet resource have 3DMark Physics test data. It represents a test that makes calculations in game physics.
WinRAR 4.0
A familiar file archiver. The tests were carried out under Windows OS. The compression speed in the RAR archive was checked, for this purpose huge volumes of randomly generated files were used. The resulting speed in the process of compression «kilobytes per second» — this is the test indicator. Core i7-7820EQ has a clear advantage in WinRAR data compression and packing speed, the result of file processing was 5444.08 Kb/s. Core 2 Quad Q9 is far behind it650, the speed of which did not exceed 2195.39 Kb / s.
TrueCrypt AES
This is not quite a tester, but the results of its work can give an assessment of the performance of the entire system.
It can fully function in different operating systems Mac OS X, Linux and Windows. Our site shows the results of the encryption speed in Gb / s using the AES algorithm. It so happened that support for this program was stopped on May 28, 2014. It includes the ability to quickly encrypt disk partitions.
Comparison of Intel Core i7-3770T and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-3770T and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames ), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score.
Intel Core i7-3770T
versus
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-3770T
- Newer processor, release date difference 3 year(s) 8 month(s)
- Approximately 23% more clock speed frequency: 3.70 GHz vs 3 GHz
- Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- 2.1 times less power consumption: 45 Watt vs 95 Watt
- About 48% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark: 1900 vs 1285
- 2.3 times more performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark: 5556 vs 2446
- About 70% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 754 vs 444
- 2x more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 2820 vs 1400
- Performance in benchmark e CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 13.1 times bigger: 7.681 vs 0.587 - CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 86% better performance: 0.302 vs 0.162
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) about 57% better performance: 1.849 vs 1.175
| Production date | April 2012 vs August 2008 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.70 GHz vs 3 GHz |
| Process | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1900 vs 1285 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 5556 vs 2446 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 754 vs 444 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2820 vs 1400 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
7.681 vs 0.587 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.302 vs 0.162 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.849 vs 1.175 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
- About 2% more max core temperature: 71.4°C vs 69.8°C
- 6 times larger L2 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3.1 times better performance : 30.945 vs 9.952
- performance in the Benchmark Compubench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (Mhash/S) about 30% more: 4.276 VS 3.286
| The maximum nucleus temperature | 71. 4°C vs 69.8°C |
| Level 2 cache | 6144 KB (per die) vs 256 KB (per core) |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.945 vs 9.952 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.276 vs 3.286 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-3770T
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
|||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-3770T | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1900 | 1285 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 5556 | 2446 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 754 | 444 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2820 | 1400 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
7.681 | 0.587 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.952 | 30.945 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.302 | 0.162 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.849 | 1.175 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.286 | 4.276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 2442 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
2442 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 |
Feature comparison
| Intel Core i7-3770T | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Ivy Bridge | Yorkfield |
| Production date | April 2012 | August 2008 |
| Price at first issue date | $330 | |
| Place in the ranking | 1979 | 2776 |
| Price now | $329. 99 |
$54.49 |
| Processor Number | i7-3770T | Q9650 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 7.32 | 22.69 |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2. 50 GHz |
3.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 1333 MHz FSB |
| Crystal area | 160mm | 214 mm2 |
| Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 6144 KB (per die) |
| Level 3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | |
| Process | 22nm | 45nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 69. 8°C |
71.4°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.70 GHz | 3GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 8 | |
| Number of transistors | 1400 million | 820 million |
| Permissible core voltage | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25. 6 GB/s |
|
| Maximum memory size | 32GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1333/1600 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Device ID | 0x162 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 650MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Maximum GPU clock | 1.15 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Integrated graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 | |
| WiDi support | ||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm |
37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Supported sockets | FCLGA1155 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 2011B | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 & 2×4 | |
| Anti-Theft Technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4.
|