Intel Core i7-4790K vs Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3: What is the difference?
51points
Intel Core i7-4790K
32points
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
vs
64 facts in comparison
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Why is Intel Core i7-4790K better than Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3?
- 21.21% faster CPU speed?
4 x 4GHzvs4 x 3.3GHz - 0.7GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.4GHzvs3.7GHz - Has integrated graphics?
- Has an unlocked multiplier?
- Has F16C?
- Has FMA3?
Why is Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 better than Intel Core i7-4790K?
- 8W lower TDP?
80Wvs88W - Supports ECC memory?
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
vs
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
vs
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
vs
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
vs
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
vs
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
vs
Intel Xeon E3-1235
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i5-6600K
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
vs
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i5+8400
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
vs
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2660
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
vs
Intel Xeon E3-1290
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Core i7-4790K
2 User reviews
Intel Core i7-4790K
9. 5/10
2 User reviews
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
0 User reviews
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
9.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
9.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
9.5/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Energy efficiency
10.0/10
2 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.CPU speed
4 x 4GHz
4 x 3.3GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.4GHz
3.7GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
✖Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.
25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
2MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1600MHz
1600MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
25.6GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
✔Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
423.2seconds
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.
Blender (classroom) result
1320.7seconds
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
✔Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
✔Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
✔Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
✖Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
✔Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
✖Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i7-4790K vs Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-4790K and Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Core i7-4790K
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-4790K
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 19% higher clock speed: 4.
40 GHz vs 3.70 GHz - Around 18% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2464 vs 2086
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 8059 vs 6794
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 1070 vs 865
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 3995 vs 3280
- Around 20% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score: 4416 vs 3667
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.95 vs 4.829
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 100.106 vs 83.748
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.695 vs 0.585
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.814 vs 2.375
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.147 vs 5.897
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Maximum frequency | 4. 40 GHz vs 3.70 GHz |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2464 vs 2086 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 8059 vs 6794 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 1070 vs 865 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 3995 vs 3280 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 4416 vs 3667 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.95 vs 4.829 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.106 vs 83.748 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
0.695 vs 0.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.814 vs 2.375 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.147 vs 5.897 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 88 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 88 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-4790K
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-4790K | Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2464 | 2086 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 8059 | 6794 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 1070 | 865 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 3995 | 3280 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 4416 | 3667 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
5.95 | 4.829 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.106 | 83.748 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.695 | 0.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.814 | 2.375 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.147 | 5.897 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1279 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
2489 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3454 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1279 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2489 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3454 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i7-4790K | Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Devil’s Canyon | Haswell |
| Launch date | 1 June 2013 | June 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $339 | $264 |
| Place in performance rating | 1008 | 1463 |
| Price now | $306. 99 |
$261.66 |
| Processor Number | i7-4790K | E3-1230 v3 |
| Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | Intel® Xeon® Processor E3 v3 Family |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.73 | 10.50 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Server |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 4. 00 GHz |
3.30 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 177 mm | 160 mm |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 74. 04°C |
|
| Maximum frequency | 4.40 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 8 |
| Transistor count | 1400 Million | 1400 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| Number of QPI Links | 0 | |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25. 6 GB/s |
25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR3 and DDR3L 1333/1600 at 1.5V |
| ECC memory support | ||
| Device ID | 0x412 | |
| Execution Units | 20 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 25 GHz |
|
| Graphics max frequency | 1.25 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 2 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | None |
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
| Max resolution over eDP | [email protected] | |
Max resolution over HDMI 1. 4 |
[email protected] | |
| Max resolution over VGA | [email protected] | |
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1150 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 88 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013D | PCG 2013D |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3. 0 |
3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | 1×16, 2×8, 1×8/2×4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Intel Core i7-4790K vs.
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Intel Core i7-4790K
The Intel Core i7-4790K operates with 4 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.40 GHz base 4.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 88 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1150 CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Devils Canyon S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2014
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
The Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 operates with 4 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 3.70 GHz base 3.70 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 80 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1150 CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Haswell S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d.
The product was launched on Q2/2013
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Compare Detail
| 4.00 GHz | Frequency | 3.30 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4.40 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.70 GHz |
| 4.20 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.70 GHz |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| Yes | Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
|
Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
GPU | no iGPU |
| 1.25 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 22 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| 1.25 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 11.1 | DirectX Version | |
| 3 | Max. displays | |
| Memory | DDR3-1600 | |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No | ECC | Yes |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
8. 00 MB |
L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | |
| 22 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| LGA 1150 | Socket | LGA 1150 |
| 88 W | TDP | 80 W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q2/2014 | Release date | Q2/2013 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms.
The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.
5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D.
The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
| Intel Core i7-4790K | Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 | |
| 88 W | Max TDP | 80 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
Intel Core i7-4790K vs Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3: What is the difference?
51 BALLLA
Intel Core i7-4790K
32 BALLLA
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3
64 Facts compared to
Intel i7-4790K
9000 Is the i7-4790K better than the Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3?
- 21.
21% higher CPU speed?
4 x 4GHz vs 4 x 3.3GHz - 0.7GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.4GHz vs 3.7GHz - Does it have integrated graphics?
- Has an unlocked multiplier?
- Has F16C?
- Has FMA3?
Why is Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 better than Intel Core i7-4790K?
- 8W below TDP?
80W vs 88W - Supports memory recovery code?
What are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Core i5-4690k
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3
VS
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V3
Intel Core i7-4790k
Intel Core I7-4770K
V3
VS
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V5
Intel Core i7-4790K
VS
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3
VS
INTEL XEON E3-124000 Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
AMD RYZEN 5 5600X
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3
VS
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V3
Intel Core i7-4790k
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
9000 3,0003 9000 INTEL XEN
VS
Intel Xeon E3-1280 V3
Intel Core i7-4790k
VS
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3
VS
Intel E3-123-1235 9000 9000 9000 -4790K
vs
Intel Core i5-6600k
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3
VS
Intel Xeon E5-1650 V4
Intel Core i7-4790k
Intel Core i5+8400
Intel Xeon
VS
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2
Intel Core i7-4790k
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3
VS
9000 -4790K
vs
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3
VS
Intel Xeon E3-1290
Complexation prices
Users Reviews
9.
5 /10
2 reviews of users
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3
0 Reviews of Users
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3
0.0 /10
0 Reviews of Users 9Ol000 Productivity
9.5 /10
2 Votes
Reviews is not
Reliability
/10
2 VOTES
Reviews yet not
Energy efficiency
10.0 /10
2 Votes
Reviews are not yet
Productivity
1. Skurvity of the central processor
4 x 4GHZ
4 x 3.3ghz 9000 how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, given all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.
speed turbo clock
4.4GHz
3.7GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has unlocked multiplier
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
✖Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
2MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1600MHz
1600MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
25.6GB/s
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7. Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
✔Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
A newer version of eMMC — Embedded Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
This benchmark measures processor performance using multithreading.
2nd PassMark result (single)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
423.2seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
1320.7seconds
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene.
More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
This means that the processor is more efficient, resulting in more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
✔Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
✔Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
✔Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
✖Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔Intel Core i7-4790K
✔Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i7-4790K
✖Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology (DRM).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-4790K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 vs. Intel Core i7-4790K
Cpu Benchmark with 9 tests0019
| Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |
| 3.70GHz | Frequency | 4.00 GHz |
| 4.00 GHz | Turbo (1 core) | 4.40 GHz |
| 3.90GHz | Turbo (all cores) | 4.20 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| yes | Hyperthreading ? | yes |
| No | Overclocking? | yes |
| normal | Basic architecture | normal |
| no iGPU | GPU | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
| DirectX Version | 11. 1 |
|
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| DDR4-2133 | memory size | |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max. memory size | ||
| yes | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
| 8.00MB | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| LGA 1151 | Socket | LGA 1150 |
| 80W | TDP | 88W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q4/2015 | Issue date | Q2/2014 |
| show more details | show more details |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result.
The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform test that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have passed CPU-Benchmark testing. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Benchmark formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Popular comparison
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 vs. Intel Core i7-4790K — Specs and Test Cpu Benchmark
4.5 of 47 rating(s)
I7 4770 vs i7 4790 • Web cheat sheet for internet entrepreneurs!
Contents
- 1 Why is the Intel Core i7-4770 better than the Intel Core i7-4790K?
- 2 Why is Intel Core i7-4790K better than Intel Core i7-4770?
- 2.1 What are the most popular comparisons?
- 8.1 Recommended reading
Why is Intel Core i7-4770 better than Intel Core i7-4790K?
- 4W below TDP
Why is Intel Core i7-4790K better than Intel Core i7-4770?
- 17.
65% higher CPU clock speed
4 x 4GHz vs 4 x 3.4GHz - 0.5GHz higher speed turbo clock
What are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-4770k
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i5-
Intel Core i7-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-4777-477EN
Intel Core i7-4790k
Intel Core i7-7700k
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V3
Intel Core I7-47903
I5-4690K 9000C
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i7-4790k
Intel Core i7-9700k
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-47703
I7-47-4790K
I7-47-4790K 3770
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i7-4770k
Intel Core i7-4790k
Intel Core i9-9900k
Intel Core I7-477703
Intel Core I7-47903
Intel Core I7-47904 AM
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i5-7400
General information
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
The heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that the cooling system will have to dissipate. A lower TDP also usually means less power consumption.
Intel Atom E3805
A smaller size indicates a newer chip manufacturing process.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
32-bit operating system can support up to 4 GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4 GB, which improves performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i7-4790K
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Intel Core i7-4930MX
PCI Express (PCIe) is a high speed expansion card standard that is used to connect a computer to its peripherals. Newer versions support higher throughput and provide better performance.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Performance
Intel Xeon Platinum 9282
More L2 flash memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
Intel Xeon Phi 7290F
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
Intel Xeon Phi 7290F
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Intel Core i9-9900
More L1 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
Intel Xeon Phi 7290F
Memory
Can support faster memory that speeds up system performance.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
Intel Xeon E7-8830
Features
Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under light load.
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i7-4790K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i7-4790K
It’s easier to get better quality using virtualization if it’s hardware supported.
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i7-4790K
Many Intel processors use Hyperthreading technology, which means that each processor core can run on two threads at the same time, rather than most processors that run on a single thread for each core. This means you will get better quality in some applications.
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel’s advanced transistor technology for low power consumption and high speed.
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i7-4790K
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
We have already got acquainted with Intel’s solutions, which belong to the lower half of the mass segment of desktop processors, having tested both Pentium and Core i3.
It’s time to move higher, but for now we will not be tied to the possibilities for games — there will be tests with a discrete graphics card this year, but later. Today we will see what the company can offer to a wealthy, but not very concerned about games buyer ?
Test stand configuration
| Processor | Intel Core i3-4170 | Intel Core i5-4690K | Intel Core i7-4770K | Intel Core i7-4785T | Intel Core i7-4790K |
| Kernel name | Haswell | Haswell | Haswell | Haswell | Haswell |
| Production technology | 22 nm | 22 nm | 22 nm | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Core frequency, GHz | 3.7 | 3.5/3.9 | 3.5/3.9 | 2.2/3.2 | 4.0/4.4 |
| Cores/Threads | 2/4 | 4/4 | 4/8 | 4/8 | 4/8 |
| L1 cache (total), I/D, KB | 64/64 | 128/128 | 128/128 | 128/128 | 128/128 |
| L2 cache, KB | 2×256 | 4×256 | 4×256 | 4×256 | 4×256 |
| L3 cache, MiB | 3 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| RAM | 2×DDR3-1600 | 2×DDR3-1600 | 2×DDR3-1600 | 2×DDR3-1600 | 2×DDR3-1600 |
| TDP, W | 53 | 88 | 84 | 35 | 88 |
| Graphics | HDG 4400 | HDG 4600 | HDG 4600 | HDG 4600 | HDG 4600 |
| Quantity EU | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Frequency std/max, MHz | 350/1150 | 350/1200 | 350/1250 | 350/1200 | 350/1250 |
| Price | T-12515768 | T-10887398 | T-10384297 | T-10820116 | T-10820114 |
The minimum today will be the Core i3-4170, which also remains almost the fastest Core i3 in the desktop line (models 4360 and 4370 only slightly outperform it, and we haven’t tested them using the new method yet).
And since it is the fastest in its sub-line, it makes sense to test also the fastest Core i5 and i7 — 4690K and 4790K. The previous flagship of the line, namely the Core i7-4770K, will also come in handy for us — it runs at the same clock speeds as the i5-4690K, so a direct comparison of these models is very revealing. And one more processor — Core i7-4785T is also the fastest, but in its class. The fact is that the heat pack of this model is only 35 W, which is even better than many mobile processors. Naturally, this is not given for nothing, so it works at clock frequencies around 3 GHz, or even lower, but otherwise it is a full-fledged Core i7, and not all Pentium and Core i3. The truth is how this will affect — without tests it is not known. That’s what we’re going to do now.
As for other test conditions, they were equal, but not the same: all processors were tested exclusively using integrated graphics, and the frequency of RAM was the maximum supported by the specifications.
But its volume (8 GB) and system drive (Toshiba THNSNh356GMCT, 256 GB) were the same for all subjects.
Test methodology
To evaluate performance, we used our performance measurement methodology using iXBT Application Benchmark 2015 and iXBT Game Benchmark 2015. We normalized all test results in the first benchmark against the results of the reference system, which this year will be the same for laptops , and for all other computers, which is designed to make it easier for readers to compare and choose:
| Processor | Intel Core i5-3317U |
| Chipset | Intel HM77 Express |
| Memory | 4 GB DDR3-1600 (dual channel) |
| Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
| Accumulator | SSD 128 GB Crucial M4-CT128M4SSD1 |
| Operating system | Windows 8 (64-bit) |
| Intel graphics driver version | 9. 18.10.3186 |
iXBT Application Benchmark 2015
Result. Funny. Well, firstly, the Core i7-4785T turned out to be equal to the i5-4690K — even clock speeds did not help the latter. However, they should not be neglected either — the i7-4770K running on the same i5-4690K outperformed the i5-4690K by 22%, however, as we can see, sometimes the frequency can be exchanged for a “cramped case” without losing performance. And regarding both older Core i7s, you can see that they are about twice as fast as the Core i3-4170, which is not surprising: in terms of the processor component, i3 is just half the i7 about ?
However, it is not always possible to load all the cores and threads with work — especially when there are already eight of the latter (ie, as in desktop Core i7 or older representatives of the AMD FX line). Therefore, here the difference between 4770K and 4690K is reduced to 10% — Hyper-Threading is still not useless, but not as useful as in the previous group.
Here are the «real» cores — as before they are useful: both in the first and in the second group of programs, the 4690K bypassed the i3-4370 by about one and a half times. And the 4785T in such conditions can only compete with the Core i3. However, it is still the fastest, but not so much that it is considered fundamental.
As we said last time, desktop Core i3 are the best processors for working with graphics when money matters the older Core i7 is now one and a half times faster, and this is a lot. But the older one is with its frequencies above 4 GHz. And the 4785T proves convincingly that multithreading alone in many programs is still not enough to get good results.
Especially when it comes to such «reserves of legacy code» — all that older Cores can oppose to younger ones is a slightly higher clock frequency. That’s when they can — something happens. And when they can’t, it’s all very sad.
Audition somehow scales, and it gets better with each version, but in practice this is noticeable only in the case of older Core i5 and i7.
The 4785T is only slightly faster than the 4170, so we can assume that it has nothing to do in a «regular» case. And in a very small one, it may turn out to be a good solution, provided, of course, that the buyer does not find it possible to save money by buying one of the younger models of the “T” family: remember that the 4170T lagged behind the 4170 here by only 16%, which is not is fundamental ?
But if you can load all the cores, then, of course, there is nothing to catch even the Core i5, not to mention the Core i3: and the i5-4690K is still 10% behind the i7-4785T, i.e. the 35W limit isn’t too bad for a quad-core Haswell. On the other hand, it is clear that you only need to “clamp” like this if you really need it: in fact, the price of this processor is somewhere at the level of the Core i7-4770 (without indexes), and the performance in this case differs by 20%. Yes, and the Core i5-4690K is slower by 10%, but at the same time cheaper by one and a half times. In general, everything is good in moderation.
In classic desktops, you can also use processors with TDP> 65 W (yes, even 150 W), in more compact computers, S and T should already be used: 65/45/35 W. The same 4785T, in principle, can already be packed in a liter case or less, i.e. to make something «NUC-shaped», but, nevertheless, very powerful. There would be demand ?
Archivers are still holding back the single-threaded process of unpacking data (and you have to do this much more often than packing them), so the performance of the test subjects against the background of the Core i3-4170 does not cause much reverence.
An easily explainable picture — in fact, the processors on the first three lines have approximately the same frequency when loading one or two cores, the 4785T has the lowest frequency among others (even in boost mode), and the 4790K has the highest.
In file operations, the only obvious outsider is 4785T again. And again, apparently, because of the clock frequency — «lazier» it exits idle mode.
Finally, we come to such a picture. The performance of modern processors depends on the price in a non-linear way, so paying twice as much for a Core i7 instead of a Core i3, you will get on average only one and a half times better performance. However, this is not so little, so if the financial aspect is not of decisive importance (especially since the difference becomes much smaller against the background of the cost of the entire computer), there is a point in acquiring a Core i5 or i7. But not everyone — i7-4785T is essentially a «thing in itself», loosely connected with the main line. But if you need something small, the buyer has no other way. However, the good news is that you can get the performance level of «regular» i3 and i5 in this case. Let it be expensive enough.
Gaming applications
For obvious reasons, for computer systems of this level, we limit ourselves to the minimum quality mode, not only in «full» resolution, but also with its reduction to 1366×768.
Despite the fact that the integrated graphics of desktop processors of the A10 line is the best on the market, even it is not yet able to satisfy the demanding gamer in terms of picture quality. This is especially true for Intel processors, where graphics are even weaker in most models. But if you voluntarily agree to the «minimal wages», you can save a lot. We already know this well from previous tests, but today we’ll just see how our updated gaming set works on these processors.
Formally, the graphics core in all processors is the same — HDG 4600. In fact, the difference between Core i3 and older models is visible even in this game, which is not related to processor-dependent ones. But the difference is quantitative, not qualitative — for HD there is enough for everyone, for FHD no one.
As has been said more than once, single-threaded performance matters, and it is close for four out of five processors. However, at the minimum, all five are enough for FHD, so there is nothing more to find out here.
Another CPU-intensive game, but optimized for multiple threads. However, «several» and in her case is far from eight, so that all our subjects are approximately equal. Is the Core i3-4170 a little behind the others, but it is already enough for FHD resolution, and it is difficult to demand more from games on integrated graphics.
A quad-core processor would be better for the Metro games as well. They are also very demanding on the graphics adapter, but in general, as we can see, on the Core i5 / i7 there is a clear transition from quantity to quality — you can already play at least at a reduced resolution. However, if you have even an inexpensive video card, a Pentium is also suitable, and in FHD, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves, revealing the topic of one of the following materials ?
This is not the first time Hitman has been identical to Metro.
Well, for Thief, no integrated graphics solutions are yet suitable at all.
But Tomb Raider is able to “adapt” well to different hardware, so here again we are seeing a transition from Core i3 to Core i5, but in FHD.
What can not be said about these two games. The first simply does not lend itself to integrated Intel graphics, and the second can be played on Core i3 (but only in HD), and a more expensive processor does not fundamentally change anything.
In general, nothing unexpected, except that with the formal identity of the GPU in all the tested processors, the older models in terms of games are able to do what the younger ones are not capable of. On the other hand, the absolute performance indicators are such that. If you are interested in games, you should not limit yourself to integrated video. It is better to save on the processor than on the video card. In any case, this is true for four out of five processors. But the Core i7-4785T is a special case: as it has already been said more than once, it needs to work in harsh conditions (it is better to put a model with a “regular” heat pack in a regular PC), where it is hardly possible to use a discrete video card.
So here the fact that in games it is not inferior to other top models is very pleasing.
Total
We haven’t learned anything fundamentally new today, since all these processors have been tested in one form or another before. In the Intel range, the Core i5 is slightly faster on average than the Core i3, but falls behind the Core i7. Considering the existence of Celeron and Pentium (including processors with low power consumption), the junior and senior models of desktop families differ by about an order of magnitude: the Pentium J2900 is about six times slower than the Core i7-4790K, but now it belongs to desktop processors and the slower Celeron J1800, which at one time lagged behind the J29 in our tests according to the previous version of the methodology00 a little more than one and a half times. And above there are also processors for LGA2011 with up to six or eight cores, which are even faster than representatives of the LGA1150 mass platform. In a word, everything is fine: from the point of view of the processor component, each buyer can find something suitable for himself both in terms of performance and price (the latter, by the way, also differs by 25 or 8 times even within the LGA1150, which quite noticeable).
The only thing that still leaves much to be desired is the performance of the integrated graphics core, which even in older models does not allow you to fully play games. Something works, of course, but only at low resolutions and low image quality. So in some areas of application, one processor cannot be limited so far — you will have to purchase a discrete video card.
Only one processor, Core i7-4785T, turned out to be essentially new for us today. A very specific solution, which has an even lower TDP than most laptop quad-core processors, but its performance is adequate. However, any complaints can be made against it only when compared with the «regular» desktop models of the same family — as we saw today, on average it turns out to be approximately equal to the younger Core i5 models, and sometimes it overtakes the older ones. This allows you to create compact, but powerful enough computers based on the LGA1150, which increases the versatility of the platform. But, of course, these platforms will not be gaming — the graphics capabilities of the Core i7-4785T are as modest as those of «regular» models, and more or less decent gaming video cards make much more serious demands on the cooling system than any processors.
It is still impossible to do without a discreet in a gaming computer for any money. According to the previous version of the methodology, we did not test such systems, according to the new one, we will. But a little later ?
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-4790 and Intel Core i7-4770 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphic interfaces, Image quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization. Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.
0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps).
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-4790
- Newer processor, release date difference 10 month(s)
- Approximately 3% higher clock speed: 4.00 GHz vs 3.90 GHz
- Performance in PassMark — Single thread mark about 2% higher: 2282 vs 2227
- Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 2% higher: 9989 vs 9781
- Approximately 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 4268 vs 4144
- About 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 13596 vs 13227
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 4% better: 89.166 vs 86.045
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — V >
| Features | |
| Issue date | 1 April 2014 vs June 2013 |
| Maximum frequency | 4. 00 GHz vs 3.90 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2282 vs 2227 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 9989 vs 9781 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 4268 vs 4144 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 13596 vs 13227 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.25 vs 5.229 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 89.166 vs 86.045 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.65 vs 0.647 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.585 vs 2.542 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.435 vs 6.277 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-4770
- Performance in GFXBench 4.
