Nuc haswell: Intel D54250WYKH Haswell NUC Kit with 2.5″ Drive Slot Mini-Review

107 Comments

IntroductionHardware and Setup ImpressionsPerformance MetricsNetworking Performance and Streaming AspectsThe NUC as an HTPCMiscellaneous Factors and Concluding Remarks

The Intel NUC category has been an interesting product line to analyze, as it provides us with insights into where the traditional casual / home use desktop market might end up. Officially falling under Ultra-Compact Form Factor PCs (UCFF), units in this category take miniaturization to the extreme by even making 2.5″ drives unnecessary. Last year, we reviewed Intel’s first NUC. Fast forward to the present, and we have the Haswell-based NUC already in the market. How does Haswell improve upon the original NUC? Before going into that, a little bit of history is in order.

The ultra-compact form factor (UCFF) for PCs was originally championed by VIA Technologies with their nano-ITX (12cm x 12cm) and pico-ITX (10cm x 7.2cm) boards. Zotac was one of the first to design a custom UCFF motherboard (sized between nano-ITX and pico-ITX) for the ZBOX nano XS AD11 based on AMD Brazos. The motherboard was approximately 10cm x 10cm. Intel made this motherboard size a ‘standard’ with the introduction of the Intel NUC boards in May 2012. The first generation Intel NUCs were both launched with Core i3 17W TDP CPUs. While one model had a GbE port, the other traded it for a Thunderbolt port.

The Haswell NUCs come in two varieties too, but Intel has opted for a more conventional configuration this time around (particularly due to the slow uptake in Thunderbolt adoption in the target market). The following table provides a quick look at the specification of the two Haswell NUCs, with our review configuration highlighted. The WYB suffix refers to the board alone, while the WYK suffix refers to the kit with the chassis. The WYKH increases the dimensions of the chassis to support a 2.5″ HDD / SSD in addition to the mSATA drive.

Intel’s Haswell NUC Kits Comparison
	D34010WYK	D54250WYK
CPU	Intel Core i3-4010U	Intel Core i5-4250U
Chipset	Integrated PCH	Integrated PCH
RAM	2 x DDR3 SO-DIMM slots	2 x DDR3 SO-DIMM slots
Display Outputs	1x mini-HDMI 1. 4a, 1x mini-DP 1.2	1x mini-HDMI 1.4a, 1x mini-DP 1.2
USB	4 x USB 3.0	4 x USB 3.0
Gigabit Ethernet	Y	Y
mini PCIe (half-height)	1	1
mini PCIe (full-height, mSATA support)	1	1
Power Supply	External 19V DC	External 19V DC
Suggested Pricing	$285 — $295	$363 — $373

The layout of the board is specified in the diagram below. The integration of the PCH into the processor is one of the advantages of the Haswell NUC compared to the Ivy Bridge NUCs (which used a QS77-Express chipset).

For such a small motherboard, the unit does pack quite a punch. The choice of the WLAN card as well as the mSATA disk is left to the system builder. This is in contrast to the Gigabyte BRIX, where consumers are advised not to remove the supplied WLAN card. The extra degree of freedom will definitely be appreciated in some circles. The default chassis provided by Intel employs active cooling and has a height of only 1.4 inches. This rules out the possibility of cramming in a 2.5″ drive into the enclosure of the WYK, even though the motherboard provides SATA ports. The WYKH models alter the chassis dimensions to take advantage of the on-board port.

In the remainder of the review, we will look into our choice of components for completing the NUC build, some notes on the motherboard design, performance metrics / benchmarks, HTPC aspects and round up the review with some coverage of miscellaneous aspects such as power consumption and thermal performance.

Hardware and Setup Impressions
IntroductionHardware and Setup ImpressionsPerformance MetricsNetworking Performance and Streaming AspectsThe NUC as an HTPCMiscellaneous Factors and Concluding Remarks

PRINT THIS ARTICLE

Haswell comes to NUC — Silent PC Review

The Intel NUC D54250WYK incorporates a dualcore, hyperthreaded mobile Haswell processor running Intel HD Graphics 5000 in the palm-size chassis introduced last year, now with more I/O and an infrared remote sensor. Do Haswell’s advantages translate well to this tiny desktop PC?

Intel’s tiny NUC computer line has expanded to five kits since its release
a year ago. Recently, we examined a Logic
Supply LGX ML300 fanless system based on a NUC D53427RKE board. Our
only disappointment was that this board is not one of the new Haswell CPU boards
that incorporates a SATA port and power connector. This would have been ideal
for the ML300 chassis, which has room for a 2.5″ drive, unlike
the standard Intel NUC cases.

I asked Intel about sending one of the D54250WYB or D34010WYB boards (with
SATA port). Intel responded by sending over a D54250WYK
kit instead. This was more than expected, and I hoped to transplant the D54250WYB
board into the ML300, but then it turned out that the back panel cutout on the
ML300 review sample is incompatible with the WYB boards, and the appropriate
cutouts will not be ready for a few more weeks. Hmmm… What to do? Obvious
answer: A review of the kit.

The box was clearly marked “pre-production engineering sample” so there’s no guarantee the retail product will be identical, but it should be pretty close. The small box contained the NUC, AC/DC power adapter, VESA adapter for mounting on the back of a monitor, a sheet of basics info regarding compatible RAM, SSD, etc, and a folded up sheet that unfolds into a large illustrated setup poster — though this somehow managed not to get into the photo. This NUC case is a touch “slimmer” than our original DC3217BY sample, measuring 5mm shorter (37mm vs 42mm including the feet). The one piece that makes up the vertical panels is nicely finished aluminum, rather than the plastic of the original. It features a front panel headphone/mic jack, IR remote sensor, and happily, dual USB 3.0 ports. Our original NUC didn’t have USB 3.0 ports at all, though a single Thunderbolt back port might have been a consolation for some. The back panel has the DC power input jack, mini-DisplayPort, mini-HDMI, a gigabit ethernet port, and two more USB 3.0 ports. The bigger slots above are exhaust vents for the fan.

As with our first NUC DC3217BY sample, Intel offers the D54250WYB board in
package as a barebones kit with case, CPU-embedded motherboard and PSU. An AC
cord is not provided in all packages, presumably because of the hassles of matching
the AC plug for all the various places in the world where this product will
be sold. The AC interface is a 3-plug C6 or “cloverleaf” connector.

Some things to point out:

• The i5-4250U
  processor is a dual core with hyperthreading, 3 MB cache, 15W TDP and
  “tray cost” of $337. It happens to be the processor featured on
  this year’s MacBook Air, both 11″ and 13″ models.
• HD Graphics 5000 is Intel’s best integrated GPU, a couple steps up from
  last year’s 4000.
• For display output, it has mini-DMI and mini-DisplayPort. Unlike last year’s
  DC3217BY the mini-DP port does not support Thunderbolt.
• Only 1.35V SODIMM DDR3 RAM is supported. A whole morning was spent troubleshooting
  no-boot with half a dozen 1.5V RAM sticks before this fact was run home. The
  earlier DC3217BY NUC supports both 1.5V and 1.35V RAM.
• Yay for 4 USB 3. 0 ports!

• Gigabit ethernet is welcome, and you can add wireless if you like.
• mSATA SSDs now go all the way to 480GB, but for a price of course.
• The SATA port is 6.0 Gb/s, supported by the PCH. Note that the SATA power
  port does not supply 12V, so only 2.5″ drives are supported. This is
  moot if you’re staying with the stock Intel chassis, which has no room for
  any extra drives. Only in a larger custom case (like the Logic Supply ML300)
  is the SATA port usable.
• The $370~420 for this kit buys you a motherboard, CPU, case and power supply.
  You need to add RAM and an mSATA SSD — the system will run ~$500 before
  OS, keyboard, mouse or monitor.

SYSTEM ASSEMBLY

Only two components needed to be mounted:

• Kingston
  mSATA 120GB SSD SMS200S3/120G
• 4GB
  x2 of Kingston Value SODIMM 1600 MHz 1.35V DDR3

Windows 7 Ultimate was installed from a USB 3.0 key in well under half an hour.

No photos of the other side of the board are shown because the cooling system
is exactly the same as in the previous NUC sample. (See
this page for details.) It uses a notebook style blower fan and heatsink
with an airflow shroud.

TEST METHODOLOGY

Software and Measurement/Analysis Tools:

• CPU-Z
  to monitor CPU frequency and voltage.
• CPUBurn
  CPU stress software.
• Prime95
  CPU stress software.
• FurMark
  GPU stress software.
• Cyberlink
  PowerDVD 10 to play MOV files and Blu-ray discs.
• TMPGEnc
  Xpress to encode video.
• CrystalDiskMark
  to test storage devices.
• Real Temp
  to CPU temperatures.
• SpeedFan
  to monitor system temperatures and fan speeds.
• AIDA64
  Extreme by FinalWire to monitor system temperatures and fan speeds.
• Icy
  Dock MB981US32-1S eSATA/USB 3.0 dock to test storage subsystems.
• Kingston
  HyperX 3K 120GB solid state drive to test storage subsystems.
• Extech
  380803 Power Analyzer Datalogger, used to measure the power consumption
  of the system
• Infrared Thermometer to measure external temperatures.
• PC-based spectrum analyzer
  — SpectraPlus with ACO Pacific mic and M-Audio digital
  audio interfaces.
• Anechoic chamber
  with ambient level of 11 dBA or lower.

Testing Procedures

If available, the latest BIOS is installed prior to testing.
Our NUC was updated to BIOS WY0022.BIO dated 11/21/2013.

Certain Windows 7 services/features like Indexing, Superfetch,
System Restore, and Windows Defender are disabled to prevent them from causing
spikes in CPU/HDD usage. We also make note if energy saving features like
Cool’n’Quiet/SpeedStep or S3 suspend-to-RAM do not function properly.

Our tests determine the overall AC power consumption, noise
level, and heat output of the product at various states. To stress the CPU,
we use either Prime95 (large FFTs setting) or CPUBurn depending on which
produces higher system power consumption. To stress the GPU, we use FurMark,
an OpenGL benchmarking and stability testing utility. Video encoding and
HD video playback isalso tested for usability, power, noise and thermal
conditions.

TEST RESULTS

BIOS Fan Control Simplified

The NUC features the Intel Visual BIOS, a modern UEFI/BIOS with mouse control.
Most of the options enthusiasts expect for CPU clock and voltage adjustments
are missing, and the fan control section has been simplified considerably compared
to our original NUC. There’s a choice between AUTO and MANUAL fan control. If
manual is chosen, a single slide control for speed goes from 0 to 100%. Don’t
set it to 0% because the fan will stop altogether and the system will overheat
pretty quickly. We tried. Our system came on AUTO with the fan set at 18% minimum,
100% maximum, and that’s the way it was left. Maximum speed is over 6000 RPM
(around 32 d[email protected]), and 18% made the fan just about inaudible at 1800 RPM,
11 [email protected].

Thermals & Noise

The original Intel NUC had “the distinction of being the quietest fan-cooled
mini-computer we’ve come across.” The NUC D54250WYK, with the same cooling
system, sounds exactly the same. In normal use, you can’t hear the fan until
your ear is inches from the unit. Our highly sensitive acoustic test system
barely registered any rise in the ambient sound level in the anechoic chamber
when the NUC was idling or playing HD video, at 0.6m from the unit.

The CPU ran somewhat hot with the fan at the 18% AUTO setting, but it was no
cause for concern. The casing got fairly hot in some spots, but never too hot
to touch. With the graphics card torture test of Furmark, CPU temperatures jumped
above 82°C, when the system would go into throttling, forcing the clock
speed to drop as low as 800 MHz, then getting into a periodic cyling between
higher clock speed (up to 2.3 GHz Turbo in multi-core load) and throttling over
a 2 minute period. Furmark’s stress on the system is so high that adding Prime95
to the load does nothing to total power draw; the system simply doesn’t have
spare clock cycles to add.

With the torture test loads, Prime95 and Furmark, the fan noise jumped in both
volume and pitch. At full tilt, it emits a hissy and whiny noise. But with normal
loads, including a long sequence of video encoding, the noise always remained
very low.

Mounted on the back of a monitor, the SPL did not drop by more than a decibel,
but the overall perception of higher frequency noise dropped so that the subjective
impression was of a softer overall sound. This is a benefit only when the system
is being pushed hard enough so that the fan RPM exceeds ~3,000 RPM; below that
speed, the fan is quiet just resting under the monitor.

COMPARISONS

Energy Efficiency

The Intel NUC D54250WYK reaches all new lows in idle, and video playback. The
AC idle power is 3W lower than any previous tested system, and H.264 playback
power draw is 4W lower. The numbers don’t seem like much until you consider
that they are single digits: 6W, 8W, and 9W respectively for the three states.
They represent power reductions from previous bests of 33%, 25% and 31% respectively.

Energy efficiency drops a bit with more intensive applications but still remains
among the best ever. The vast power difference between minimum and maximum load
is impressive, 6W to 40W, reflecting both the energy savings functions as well
as the performance enhancement functions in the Intel processor.

Performance

This Intel NUC, along with its other recent NUC brethren (Logic Supply ML300),
outperforms all previously reviewed mini-computers by substantial margins in
every category. While a bit shy of the performance of a Sandybridge i3-2100,
it trades blows equally with an AMD FM2 A8-5600K. It clearly offers the kind
of performance expected of a modern desktop system.

Intel HD Graphics 5000

As the graphics engine is essentially the same as the HD Graphics 5000 in desktop
chips, we refer you to the GPU benchmarks in our Intel
Core i7-4770K Haswell Processor review. Its 3D performance is definitely
improved over the HD Graphics 4000 in the original NUC, perhaps by as much as
25% depending on the game or application. This GPU is good enough for online
gaming, but it can’t replace a discrete GPU for most modern gaming titles except
at lower resolution and detail settings. Video playback is perfectly smooth
on 1080p content including H.264 MKV/MOV and Flash (YouTube HD).

Storage Subsystem Performance

To test storage subsystems CrystalDiskMark was employed on the 1000 MB setting
with 0x00 fill test data, and a Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB solid state drive (compressible
data produces the best possible speeds out SandForce drives). The drive was
connected using an Icy Dock external dock which supports eSATA and USB 3.0 (limited
to 3 Gbps and 5 Gbps respectively). This drive was also used to test the internal
SATA data and power ports.

The performance of the Kingston 120 mSATA drive (left screen) in the NUC D54250WYK
was very speedy. USB 3.0 performance (right screen) was surprisingly modest,
notable enough that several other USB 3.0 SSDs and drives were tried, all with
similar results. In contrast, on recent motherboards, sequential reads/writes
with 1M and 512K data approach 200 MB/s, nearly double that of the NUC.

The SATA port had to be tested with the cover off, as there is no way to shoehorn
a 2.5″ drive into the NUC.

Neither the SATA or the mSATA port is likely to be a bottleneck for any type
of data transfer in or out of the system. The reality is that there are only
two methods of transferring data in/out: LAN and USB 3.0. Gigabit ethernet is
limited to 125 MB/s theoretical max, and the NUC’s USB 3. 0 peformance is slightly
lower than that.

For your interest, we did run some quick tests with the gigabit ethernet port
and found performance to be fairly typical: Bursts close to saturating the LAN
capacity, typically maintaining 70~90 MB/s average in either direction.

FINAL THOUGHTS

The NUC evolution continues, with the Haswell i5-4250 in this D54250WYK providing
incremental savings in power and similar boosts in performance over last year’s
Ivy Bridge i3-3217U in the NUC DC3217BY. An idle power level of just 6W and
typical use power barely into two digits is very impressive in one sense; in
another sense, it’s what you find in current Ultrabooks using similar components.
As with such laptops, in normal use, the acoustics of this NUC remain unobtrusive
enough to be trivial. If the NUC represents the future of mainstream desktop
computing (other than gaming), then the line between desktop and mobile computing
is so blurred as to be nonexistent.

The generous inclusion of four USB 3.0 in the D54250WYK is welcome, albeit
with some misgivings about the surprisingly anemic performance. Admittedly,
this will not impact real transfers with a single USB drive. This model, with
both mini HDMI and mini DisplayPort connections, offers multi-monitor support,
and up to 4K on a single monitor with either video port. All this plus the gigabit
LAN to access a high capacity file/media streaming server makes this NUC a near-ideal
Media PC. Thunderbolt is not supported through the DP port as it was in the
DC3217BY, but the multiple USB 3.0 ports are probably more practical alternative
for most users.

Pricing remains a bit high compared to a similarly equipped mini-ITX system,
but we’ve always paid more for miniaturization. As many of you know, Intel partner
Gigabyte’s
BRIX line is directly competitive with and very similar to the NUC, but
at time of writing, pricing
of equivalent models is really no different and perhaps even a bit higher.
One expects a few more players will come into this market, and the tendency
will be for competition to put downward pressure on price. Interestingly, the
similarly featured NUC
D34010WYK kit, with i3-4010U and Intel HD Graphics 4400, typically sells
for $300, which seems like a considerably better deal.

The Intel NUC has obviously carved out a spot for itself in the tech consumer
marketplace. The D54250WYK iteration is solid but screams for a bigger case
to take advantage of that SATA 6 G/s port. You can easily guess that I’m awaiting
a new ML300 chassis from Logic
Supply to transplant the innards of this NUC into, along with a high capacity
2.5″ drive, perhaps one of the new 1
TB 2.5″ WD Reds. Then we’ll see whether my trusty old AMD 785G mATX
HTPC setup survives the comparison.

Our thanks to Intel
for the NUC sample.

Intel NUC D54250WYK wins the SPCR’s Editor’s Choice Award

* * *

Articles of Related Interest
Logic Supply LGX ML300 Fanless
NUC
Logic
Supply LGX AG150 Fanless Mini PC
Sapphire
Edge HD3: AMD E-450 Mini PC
Intel Next Unit of Computing Kit
DC3217BY

* * *

Discuss
this article in the SPCR forums.

Silent PC Review is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn More

Vici on the map, USA. Current time, nearest cities

Wichi on the map, USA. Current time, nearest cities

Show country capitals

Distance

City

Wichi on the map, USA

38.11143

N/A

population

Exact time — 14:54

Other Locations

Verdon Opdike Haswell Sawyerville Coffeyville Leland Clifford Morrowville Morland Brian Head Blue Mound Liscombe Crockett Mills Stoneville Laona New Virginia Kelford Airport Ruth Blossberg Edson

Contents

• Location
• Coordinates
• Local time
• Sunrise and sunset
• Surrounding cities
• Distance to the capital

Where is Wichy located

The exact location is Wichy, Maris County, Missouri, United States of America, marked with a red marker on the map.

Coordinates

Wichi, United States coordinates in decimal format: latitude — 38.1114322, longitude — -91.7604389. When converted to degrees, minutes, seconds, Wichi has the following coordinates: 38°6′41.16 north latitude and -91°45′37.58 east longitude.

Local time

The time zone for this Wichi location is UTC -5 America/Chicago. The exact time is Wednesday, July 7, 2023, 01:54.

Sunrise and sunset

Wichi, sunrise and sunset data for the date — Wednesday 07/05/2023.

Voskhod	Sunset	Day (duration)
05:53 +1 minute	20:30 -0 minutes	14 hours 36 minutes. -1 minute

You can control the scale of the map using the auxiliary tools to find out exactly where Wichi is located. When you change the scale of the map, the width of the ruler (in kilometers and miles) also changes.

Nearest cities

Largest cities nearby:

• St. Louis — 146 km
• Springfield — 168 km
• Independence — 252 km
• Kansas City — 265 km
• North Kansas City — 267 km
• Overland Park — 268 km
• Vancouver — 277 km
• Peoria — 339 km
• Topeka — 353 km
• Memphis — 362 km
• Evansville — 365 km
• Little Rock — 375 km
• Des Moines — 415 km
• Clarksville — 428 km
• Tulsa — 435 km
• Joliet — 485 km
• Wichita — 490 km
• Aurora — 493 km
• Nashville — 494 km

Distance to neighboring capitals:

• Ottawa (Canada) — 1557 km
• Mexico City (Mexico) — 2196 km
• Belmopan (Belize) — 2338 km
• Guatemala (Guatemala) — 2616 km

90 032 Nuuk (Greenland) — 3905 km

Distance to the capital

The distance to the capital (Washington) is approximately 1283 km.

2023

2Markers
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contacts
Distance map

Loading time 0. 0189 s.

Select country

Australia

Austria

Azerbaijan

Aland Islands

Albania

Algeria

American Samoa

Angola

Anguilla

Andorra

Antarctica

Antigua and Barbuda

Antilles 9 0003

Argentina

Armenia

Aruba

Afghanistan

Bahamas

Bangladesh

Barbados

Bahrain

Belarus

Belize

Belgium

Benin

Bermuda

Bulgaria

Bolivia

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Botswana

Brazil

British Indian Ocean Territory

British Virgin Islands

Brunei 900 03

Bouvet

Burkina Faso

Burundi

Bhutan

Vanuatu

Vatican City

UK

Hungary

Venezuela

US Virgin Islands

Minor Outlying Islands US

East Timor

Vietnam

Gabon

Haiti

Guyana

Gambia

Ghana

Guadeloupe

Guatemala 900 03

Guinea

Guinea-Bissau

Germany

Guernsey

Gibraltar

Honduras

Hong Kong

Grenada

Greenland

Greece

Georgia

Guam

Denmark

Democratic Republic of Congo

Jersey

Djibouti

Dominica

Dominican Republic

European Union

Egypt

Zambia

Western Sahara

Zimbabwe

Israel

India

Indonesia

Jordan

Iraq

Iran

Ireland

Iceland

Spain

Italy

Yemen

Cape Verde

Kazakhstan

Cayman Islands

Cambodia

Cameroon

Canada

Qatar

Kenya

Cyprus

Kiribati

China

900 05 Cocos Islands

Colombia

Comoros

Congo

Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

Costa Rica

Ivory Coast

Cuba

Kuwait

Kyrgyzstan

Laos

Latvia

Lesotho

Liberia

Lebanon

Libya

Lithuania

Liechtenstein

Luxembourg

Mauritius

Mauritania

Madagascar

Mayotte

Macau

Macedonia

Malawi

Malaysia

Mali

Maldives

Malta 900 03

Morocco

Martinique

Marshall Islands

Mexico

Micronesia

Mozambique

Moldova

Monaco

Mongolia

Montserrat

Myanmar

Namibia

Nauru

Nepal

Niger

Nigeria

Netherlands

Nicaragua

Niue

New Zealand

New Caledonia

Norway

Norfolk

United Arab Emirates

Oman

Isle of Man

Saint Helena

Cook Islands

Pakistan

Palau

Palestine

Panama

Papua New Guinea

Paraguay

Peru

Pitcairn

Poland

Portugal

Puerto Rico

Republic of Korea

Reunion

Russia

Rwanda

Romania

El Salvador

Samoa

San Marino

Sao Tome and Principe

Saudi Arabia

Swaziland

Svalbard and Jan Mayen

Saint Lucia

Northern Mariana Islands

Seychelles

Saint Martin

Saint Pierre and Miquelon

Sep egal

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Serbia

Singapore

Syria

Slovakia

Slovenia

Solomon Islands

Somalia

Sudan

Suriname 900 03

USA

Sierra Leone

Tajikistan

Thailand

Taiwan

Tanzania

Togo

Tokelau

Tonga

Trinidad and Tobago 90 003

Tuvalu

Tunisia

Turkmenistan

Turks and Keikos

Turkey

Uganda

Uzbekistan

Ukraine

Wallis and Futuna

Uruguay

Faroe Islands

Fiji

Philippines

Finland

Falkland Islands

France

French Polynesia

French Guinea

Croatia

Central African Republic

Chad

9000 5 Montenegro

Czech Republic

Chile

Switzerland

Sweden

Sri Lanka

Ecuador

Equatorial Guinea

Eritrea

Estonia

Ethiopia

South Africa

Jamaica

Japan

Select language

Azərbaycan

Shqiptar

English

العربية

Հայերեն

9000 5 Afrikaans

Euskal

Belarusian

বাঙালি

မြန်မာ

Bulgarian

Bosanski

Cymraeg

Magyar

Tiếng Việt

galego

Ελληνικά

Ქართული

03

Zulu

עברית

Igbo

ייִדיש

Indonesia

Irish

Icelandic

9000 5 Español

Italiano

Yorùbá

Kazakh

ಕನ್ನಡ

Català

中國（繁體）

中国（简体）

한국의

Kreyòl

ខ្មែរ

ລາວ

Latin

Latvi jas

Lietuvos

Macedonian

Malagasy

Melayu

മലയാളം

Maltese

Maori

मराठी

Mongol Ulsyn

Deutsch 900 03

नेपाली

Nederlands

Norsk

ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਦੇ

فارسی

Polski

Português

Român

Russian

Sebuansky

Srpski

Sesotho

සිංහල

Slovenčina

Slovenščina

Soomaaliya

9 0005 Kiswahili

Sunda

Tagalog

Tojikiston

ไทย

தமிழ்

తెలుగు

900 05 Türk

O’zbekiston

हिन्दी

Hmong

Hrvatski

Chewa

Čeština

Svenska

Esperanto

Eesti

Jawa

日本人

Not Found (#404)

Not Found (#404)

Whoops.

..something went wrong!

Sorry, we did not find the page you are looking for

Tours

Hotels

Railway tickets

Route

Countries and cities

Egypt

Türkiye

UAE

From

Date there

date back

From

Countries

Cities

Yachting

Expeditions

Dog sled tours

Snowmobile tours

Quad tours

Hiking tours

Alloys

Bike tours

Climbing

Ski tours

Diving and snorkeling

Jeep tours

Surfing and SUP tours

Combined tours

Horse tours

Cruises

Excursion tours

Ski trips

Helicopter tours

Fishing tours

Fitness and yoga tours

Canyoning

Railway tours

Are you looking for one of the sections below?

Tours

Hotels

Railway Tickets

Routes

Attractions

We have made a selection of interesting articles for you!

Leave a review

12345

Thank you very much 🙂

Your feedback is very important to us and will be posted on the service as soon as possible.